Transforming AnthropologyVolume 31, Issue 1 p. 71-73 BOOK AND FILM REVIEWS The Problematics of Museum Sovereignty: Questions of Legibility and Representation Sabena Allen, Corresponding Author Sabena Allen [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0003-1199-4496 Department of Anthropology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Sabena Allen, Corresponding Author Sabena Allen [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0003-1199-4496 Department of Anthropology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 29 March 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/traa.12252Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL No abstract is available for this article. Volume31, Issue1April 2023Pages 71-73 RelatedInformation
《转变的人类学》第31卷第1期71-73页书籍和电影评论博物馆主权问题:易读性和代表性问题》,通讯作者:Sabena Allen [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0003-1199-4496芝加哥大学人类学系,芝加哥,IL, 60637[email protected]搜索本文作者Sabena Allen的更多论文,通讯作者Sabena Allen [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0003-1199-4496芝加哥大学人类学系,芝加哥,伊利诺伊州,60637Email: [email protected]搜索本文作者的更多论文首次发表:2023年3月29日https://doi.org/10.1111/traa.12252Read全文taboutpdf ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare给予accessShare全文accessShare全文accessShare请查看我们的使用条款和条件,并勾选下面的复选框共享文章的全文版本。我已经阅读并接受了Wiley在线图书馆使用共享链接的条款和条件,请使用下面的链接与您的朋友和同事分享本文的全文版本。学习更多的知识。本文没有摘要。vol . 31, Issue1April 2023 page 71-73
{"title":"The Problematics of Museum Sovereignty: Questions of Legibility and Representation","authors":"Sabena Allen","doi":"10.1111/traa.12252","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/traa.12252","url":null,"abstract":"Transforming AnthropologyVolume 31, Issue 1 p. 71-73 BOOK AND FILM REVIEWS The Problematics of Museum Sovereignty: Questions of Legibility and Representation Sabena Allen, Corresponding Author Sabena Allen [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0003-1199-4496 Department of Anthropology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Sabena Allen, Corresponding Author Sabena Allen [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0003-1199-4496 Department of Anthropology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 29 March 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/traa.12252Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL No abstract is available for this article. Volume31, Issue1April 2023Pages 71-73 RelatedInformation","PeriodicalId":44069,"journal":{"name":"Transforming Anthropology","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135529177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In 2010, following the granting of Temporary Protected Status by the US government, more than 1,500 Haitians settled in Mount Olive, a small town in eastern North Carolina. Most of them found work in the meat‐processing plants of the region. Plantation owners founded Mount Olive, and enslaved people built it. Discrimination and exploitation of Black people and immigrants was and remains forceful in this region. This article sketches the history of race relations and racial capitalism in Mount Olive to understand how people of Haitian descent experience both anti‐Black racism and prejudices linked to their ethnicity in rural southeastern US. Far from being passive victims of white supremacy, African Americans, and later Haitians, created practices that enabled them to live on their own terms. This article analyzes the similarities between African American practices of autonomy and present‐day Haitians’ strategies to create spaces where they can belong and thrive. The article argues that economic and spatial practices forged after the 1804 revolution by the Haitian peasantry enable people of Haitian descent to build social and economic systems based on reciprocity and solidarity. These counter‐colonial practices allow people in Mount Olive to live autonomously and away from racist institutions and people.
{"title":"Settling in the US Deep South: Race, Ethnicity, and Belonging among Haitian Migrants in a Small North Carolina Town","authors":"Vincent Joos","doi":"10.1111/traa.12245","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/traa.12245","url":null,"abstract":"In 2010, following the granting of Temporary Protected Status by the US government, more than 1,500 Haitians settled in Mount Olive, a small town in eastern North Carolina. Most of them found work in the meat‐processing plants of the region. Plantation owners founded Mount Olive, and enslaved people built it. Discrimination and exploitation of Black people and immigrants was and remains forceful in this region. This article sketches the history of race relations and racial capitalism in Mount Olive to understand how people of Haitian descent experience both anti‐Black racism and prejudices linked to their ethnicity in rural southeastern US. Far from being passive victims of white supremacy, African Americans, and later Haitians, created practices that enabled them to live on their own terms. This article analyzes the similarities between African American practices of autonomy and present‐day Haitians’ strategies to create spaces where they can belong and thrive. The article argues that economic and spatial practices forged after the 1804 revolution by the Haitian peasantry enable people of Haitian descent to build social and economic systems based on reciprocity and solidarity. These counter‐colonial practices allow people in Mount Olive to live autonomously and away from racist institutions and people.","PeriodicalId":44069,"journal":{"name":"Transforming Anthropology","volume":"31 1","pages":"42 - 56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41851956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mainstream imaginaries of success in the United States tend to center white men. This phenomenon, though increasingly criticized, pervades media systems, which have effectively served as major channels to facilitate, disperse, and popularize such ideals globally. Unsurprisingly, then, US mainstream media institutions have not generally favored non‐white and/or non‐men creators. Via code phrases such as best practices and professionalism, racialized and gendered assumptions continue to shape participatory landscapes of media production. Hence, for many Black women enrolled in formal media education and training programs, schooling's disciplinary norms—alongside society's inclination to mark and marginalize Black women as Other—both frustrate and inspire them to develop cunning, culturally mindful approaches that make use of accessible lessons, resources, and networks without abandoning the social issues and objectives that brought them to media in the first place. Framing their flexible methods of resource procurement and repurposing as projects of media fugitivity, this article explores how Black women navigate the overlapping social, technological, and ideological disciplines of institutional subjecthood and cultivate strategies through which to participate in these schooling infrastructures, while at the same time also protecting themselves from them; redistributing gains accrued in them; and selectively challenging hegemonic asks made, norms modeled, and compliances expected in them.
{"title":"“Do You Understand How Racially Motivated This Is?”: Institutional Discipline, Double Standards, and Projects of Media Fugitivity","authors":"Marla Martin","doi":"10.1111/traa.12244","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/traa.12244","url":null,"abstract":"Mainstream imaginaries of success in the United States tend to center white men. This phenomenon, though increasingly criticized, pervades media systems, which have effectively served as major channels to facilitate, disperse, and popularize such ideals globally. Unsurprisingly, then, US mainstream media institutions have not generally favored non‐white and/or non‐men creators. Via code phrases such as best practices and professionalism, racialized and gendered assumptions continue to shape participatory landscapes of media production. Hence, for many Black women enrolled in formal media education and training programs, schooling's disciplinary norms—alongside society's inclination to mark and marginalize Black women as Other—both frustrate and inspire them to develop cunning, culturally mindful approaches that make use of accessible lessons, resources, and networks without abandoning the social issues and objectives that brought them to media in the first place. Framing their flexible methods of resource procurement and repurposing as projects of media fugitivity, this article explores how Black women navigate the overlapping social, technological, and ideological disciplines of institutional subjecthood and cultivate strategies through which to participate in these schooling infrastructures, while at the same time also protecting themselves from them; redistributing gains accrued in them; and selectively challenging hegemonic asks made, norms modeled, and compliances expected in them.","PeriodicalId":44069,"journal":{"name":"Transforming Anthropology","volume":"31 1","pages":"29 - 41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42711419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Funeral Culture:\u0000 AIDS\u0000 , Work, and Cultural Change in an African Kingdom. CaseyGolomski. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2018. xi + 215 pp. (Cloth\u0000 US\u0000 $85; Paper\u0000 US\u0000 $30;\u0000 E‐Book US\u0000 $9.99).","authors":"Nikki Mulder","doi":"10.1111/traa.12249","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/traa.12249","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44069,"journal":{"name":"Transforming Anthropology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45115949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}