首页 > 最新文献

International Journal of Educational Psychology最新文献

英文 中文
Conceptual Change in Science Teaching and Learning: Introducing the Dynamic Model of Conceptual Change 科学教学中的观念转变:引入观念转变的动态模型
IF 1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2018-06-24 DOI: 10.17583/IJEP.2018.3349
L. Nadelson, Benjamin C. Heddy, Suzanne H. Jones, Gita Taasoobshirazi, M. Johnson
Conceptual change can be a challenging process, particularly in science education where many of the concepts are complex, controversial, or counter-intuitive.  Yet, conceptual change is fundamental to science learning, which suggests science educators and science education researchers need models to effectively address and investigate conceptual change.  Consideration of the current research and extant models of conceptual change reflect a need for a holistic, comprehensive, and dynamic model of conceptual change.  In response, we developed the Dynamic Model of Conceptual Change (DMCC), which uses multiple lines of research that explore the variables influencing conceptual change and the dynamic interactions that take place during the conceptual change process in science teaching and learning.  Unique to the DMCC is the potential for iterations, regression, enter and exit points at various stages of the conceptual change process, and the influences of message recognition, message engagement and processing, and the nature of the resulting conceptual change.  The DMCC contains elements from extant models along with previously un-emphasized influential conceptual change variables such as culture, society, attitude, practices, and personal epistemology.  We constructed the DMCC to provide science educators and researchers a more holistic framework for exploring conceptual change in science instruction and learning.
概念的改变可能是一个具有挑战性的过程,尤其是在科学教育中,许多概念是复杂的、有争议的或反直觉的。然而,概念变化是科学学习的基础,这表明科学教育工作者和科学教育研究人员需要模型来有效地解决和研究概念变化。对当前研究和现有概念变化模型的考虑反映了对概念变化的整体、全面和动态模型的需求。作为回应,我们开发了概念变化动态模型(DMCC),该模型使用了多条研究路线,探索影响概念变化的变量以及科学教学中概念变化过程中发生的动态互动。DMCC的独特之处在于概念变更过程各个阶段的迭代、回归、进入和退出点的可能性,以及消息识别、消息参与和处理的影响,以及由此产生的概念变更的性质。DMCC包含了现存模型中的元素,以及以前未强调的有影响力的概念变化变量,如文化、社会、态度、实践和个人认识论。我们构建DMCC是为了为科学教育工作者和研究人员提供一个更全面的框架,以探索科学教学和学习中的概念变化。
{"title":"Conceptual Change in Science Teaching and Learning: Introducing the Dynamic Model of Conceptual Change","authors":"L. Nadelson, Benjamin C. Heddy, Suzanne H. Jones, Gita Taasoobshirazi, M. Johnson","doi":"10.17583/IJEP.2018.3349","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17583/IJEP.2018.3349","url":null,"abstract":"Conceptual change can be a challenging process, particularly in science education where many of the concepts are complex, controversial, or counter-intuitive.  Yet, conceptual change is fundamental to science learning, which suggests science educators and science education researchers need models to effectively address and investigate conceptual change.  Consideration of the current research and extant models of conceptual change reflect a need for a holistic, comprehensive, and dynamic model of conceptual change.  In response, we developed the Dynamic Model of Conceptual Change (DMCC), which uses multiple lines of research that explore the variables influencing conceptual change and the dynamic interactions that take place during the conceptual change process in science teaching and learning.  Unique to the DMCC is the potential for iterations, regression, enter and exit points at various stages of the conceptual change process, and the influences of message recognition, message engagement and processing, and the nature of the resulting conceptual change.  The DMCC contains elements from extant models along with previously un-emphasized influential conceptual change variables such as culture, society, attitude, practices, and personal epistemology.  We constructed the DMCC to provide science educators and researchers a more holistic framework for exploring conceptual change in science instruction and learning.","PeriodicalId":44173,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46032864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59
Personal and Social Resources Interplay Synergistically to Enhance Academic Motivation 个人与社会资源协同作用增强学习动机
IF 1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2018-06-24 DOI: 10.17583/IJEP.2018.3017
Shameem Fatima, H. Sharif, G. Zimet
Guided by self-determination theory, the present study examines independent and interactive roles of self-efficacy and perceived social support in predicting types of academic motivation. Data were collected from 325 university undergraduates in 18-23 years of age (M=21.09, SD=1.34) from the fifth biggest city of South Asia. Results showed the independent and interactive effects of self-efficacy and social support from friends and from a significant other on intrinsic academic motivation after controlling the potential confounding due to demographics. Social support from friends, but not from family and a significant other, independently predicted extrinsic academic motivation. Neither self-efficacy nor social support significantly predicted amotivation.
在自决理论的指导下,本研究考察了自我效能感和感知社会支持在预测学业动机类型中的独立和互动作用。数据来自南亚第五大城市325名18-23岁的大学生(M=21.09,SD=1.34)。结果显示,在控制了人口统计学造成的潜在混淆后,自我效能感和来自朋友和重要他人的社会支持对内在学术动机产生了独立和互动的影响。来自朋友的社会支持,而不是来自家人和重要的另一半,独立预测了外在的学术动机。自我效能感和社会支持都不能显著预测动机。
{"title":"Personal and Social Resources Interplay Synergistically to Enhance Academic Motivation","authors":"Shameem Fatima, H. Sharif, G. Zimet","doi":"10.17583/IJEP.2018.3017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17583/IJEP.2018.3017","url":null,"abstract":"Guided by self-determination theory, the present study examines independent and interactive roles of self-efficacy and perceived social support in predicting types of academic motivation. Data were collected from 325 university undergraduates in 18-23 years of age (M=21.09, SD=1.34) from the fifth biggest city of South Asia. Results showed the independent and interactive effects of self-efficacy and social support from friends and from a significant other on intrinsic academic motivation after controlling the potential confounding due to demographics. Social support from friends, but not from family and a significant other, independently predicted extrinsic academic motivation. Neither self-efficacy nor social support significantly predicted amotivation.","PeriodicalId":44173,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42278264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Examining the Links between Parents’ Relationships with Reading and Shared Reading with their Pre-School Children 父母阅读关系与学龄前儿童共同阅读之间的联系
IF 1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2018-06-24 DOI: 10.17583/IJEP.2018.3480
Rachael Levy, M. Hall, Jennifer Preece
While much is known about the benefits of shared reading activity for children, and the role of the home in cultivating shared reading practices far less is known about the factors that can influence parents’ shared reading practices with their children. Given that many young people leave school with poor relationships with reading, this study explores the links between parents’ own relationships with reading and the shared reading they practice with their own children in the home. Drawing on deep-level interview data, this paper presents data from six parents of pre-school children, who reported that they have had a poor personal relationship with reading. These parents all developed positive shared reading relationships with their children, however the importance of this study lies in understanding the interplay between these reading relationships.  The data strongly suggested that the construct of ‘reading’ was very different from the ways in which reading had previously been defined for these participants. Reading, within a shared reading context, was seen as a very flexible construct which included activities such as talking and telling stories. In some cases, parents’ own relationships with reading seemed to improve. Implications for intervention with other families are discussed.
虽然人们对儿童共享阅读活动的好处以及家庭在培养共享阅读实践中的作用知之甚少,但对影响父母与孩子共享阅读实践的因素知之甚少。鉴于许多年轻人在离开学校时与阅读关系不佳,本研究探讨了父母自己与阅读的关系与他们在家中与孩子共同练习阅读之间的联系。根据深层访谈数据,本文提供了六位学龄前儿童家长的数据,他们报告说自己与阅读的个人关系很差。这些父母都与孩子建立了积极的共同阅读关系,然而这项研究的重要性在于理解这些阅读关系之间的相互作用。数据有力地表明,“阅读”的结构与之前为这些参与者定义阅读的方式非常不同。在共同的阅读环境中,阅读被视为一种非常灵活的结构,包括谈话和讲故事等活动。在某些情况下,父母自己与阅读的关系似乎有所改善。讨论了对其他家庭进行干预的影响。
{"title":"Examining the Links between Parents’ Relationships with Reading and Shared Reading with their Pre-School Children","authors":"Rachael Levy, M. Hall, Jennifer Preece","doi":"10.17583/IJEP.2018.3480","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17583/IJEP.2018.3480","url":null,"abstract":"While much is known about the benefits of shared reading activity for children, and the role of the home in cultivating shared reading practices far less is known about the factors that can influence parents’ shared reading practices with their children. Given that many young people leave school with poor relationships with reading, this study explores the links between parents’ own relationships with reading and the shared reading they practice with their own children in the home. Drawing on deep-level interview data, this paper presents data from six parents of pre-school children, who reported that they have had a poor personal relationship with reading. These parents all developed positive shared reading relationships with their children, however the importance of this study lies in understanding the interplay between these reading relationships.  The data strongly suggested that the construct of ‘reading’ was very different from the ways in which reading had previously been defined for these participants. Reading, within a shared reading context, was seen as a very flexible construct which included activities such as talking and telling stories. In some cases, parents’ own relationships with reading seemed to improve. Implications for intervention with other families are discussed.","PeriodicalId":44173,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48627596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Rethinking Early Literacies. Reading and Rewriting Worlds 对早期文学的反思。阅读和改写世界
IF 1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2018-06-24 DOI: 10.17583/IJEP.2018.3531
Andrea Khalfaoui
{"title":"Rethinking Early Literacies. Reading and Rewriting Worlds","authors":"Andrea Khalfaoui","doi":"10.17583/IJEP.2018.3531","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17583/IJEP.2018.3531","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44173,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41768071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
期刊
International Journal of Educational Psychology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1