European Actuarial Journal最新文献

Currently, there is a lot of research in the field of neural networks for non-life insurance pricing. The usual goal is to improve the predictive power of actuarial pricing and behavioral models via neural networks while building upon the generalized linear model, which is the current industry standard. Our paper contributes to this current journey via novel methods to enhance actuarial non-life models with transformer models for tabular data. We build here upon the foundation laid out by the combined actuarial neural network as well as the localGLMnet and enhance those models via the feature tokenizer transformer. The manuscript demonstrates the performance of the proposed methods on a real-world claim frequency dataset and compares them with several benchmark models such as generalized linear models, feed-forward neural networks, combined actuarial neural networks, LocalGLMnet, and the pure feature tokenizer transformer. The paper shows that the new methods can achieve better results than the benchmark models while preserving the structure of the underlying actuarial models, thereby inheriting and retaining their advantages. The paper also discusses the practical implications and challenges of applying transformer models in actuarial settings.

The paper discusses duration effects on the consistency of mean parameter and dispersion parameter estimators in exponential dispersion families (EDFs) that are the standard models used for non-life insurance pricing. Focus is on the standard generalised linear model assumptions where both the mean and variance, conditional on duration, are linear functions in terms of duration. We derive simple convergence results that highlight consequences when the linear conditional moment assumptions are not satisfied. These results illustrate that: (i) the resulting mean estimators always have a relevant asymptotic interpretation in terms of the duration adjusted actuarially fair premium—a premium that only agrees with the standard actuarial premium using a duration equal to one, given that the expected value is linear in the duration; (ii) deviance based estimators of the dispersion parameter in an EDF should be avoided in favour of Pearson estimators; (iii) unless the linear moment assumptions are satisfied, consistency of dispersion and plug-in variance estimators can not be guaranteed and may result in spurious over-dispersion. The results provide explicit conditions on the underlying data generating process that will lead to spurious over-dispersion that can be used for model checking. This is illustrated based on real insurance data, where it is concluded that the linear moment assumptions are violated, which results in non-negligible spurious over-dispersion.

The profit and loss (P &L) attribution for each business year into different risk factors (e.g., interest rates, credit spreads, foreign exchange rate etc.) is a regulatory requirement, e.g., under Solvency 2. Three different decomposition principles are prevalent: one-at-a-time (OAT), sequential updating (SU) and average sequential updating (ASU) decompositions. In this research, using financial market data from 2003 to 2022, we demonstrate that the OAT decomposition can generate significant unexplained P &L and that the SU decompositions depends significantly on the order or labeling of the risk factors. On the basis of an investment in a foreign stock, we further explain that the SU decomposition is not able to identify all relevant risk factors. This potentially effects the hedging strategy of the portfolio manager. In conclusion, we suggest to use the ASU decomposition in practice.

There has been an increasing interest in fraud detection methods, driven by new regulations and by the financial losses linked to fraud. One of the state-of-the-art methods to fight fraud is network analytics. Network analytics leverages the interactions between different entities to detect complex patterns that are indicative of fraud. However, network analytics has only recently been applied to fraud detection in the actuarial literature. Although it shows much potential, many network methods are not yet applied. This paper extends the literature in two main ways. First, we review and apply multiple methods in the context of insurance fraud and assess their predictive power against each other. Second, we analyse the added value of network features over intrinsic features to detect fraud. We conclude that (1) complex methods do not necessarily outperform basic network features, and that (2) network analytics helps to detect different fraud patterns, compared to models trained on claim-specific features alone.

In this paper we develop a model to find optimal decisions in retirement with respect to the consumption, risky asset allocation, access to annuities, reverse mortgage and the option to scale housing in the presence of a means-tested public pension. To solve the corresponding high-dimensional optimal stochastic control problem, we use the Least-Squares Monte Carlo simulation method. The model is applied in the context of the Australian retirement system. Few retirees in Australia utilise financial products in retirement, such as annuities or reverse mortgages. Since the government-provided means-tested Age Pension in Australia is an indirect annuity stream which is typically higher than the consumption floor, it can be argued that this could be the reason why many Australians do not annuitise. In addition, in Australia where assets allocated to the family home are not included in the means tests of Age Pension, the incentive to over-allocate wealth into housing assets is high. This raises the question whether a retiree is really better off over-allocating into the family home, while accessing home equity later on either via downsizing housing or by taking out a reverse mortgage. Our findings confirm that means-tested pension crowds out voluntary annuitisation in retirement, and that annuitisation is optimal sooner rather than later once retired. We find that it is never optimal to downscale housing when the means-tested pension and a reverse mortgage are available; only when there is no other way to access equity then downsizing is the only option.

We investigate capital allocation based on the higher moment risk measure at a confidence level (qin (0,1)). To reflect the excessive prudence of today’s regulatory frameworks in banking and insurance, we consider the extreme case with (quparrow 1) and study the asymptotic behavior of capital allocation for heavy-tailed and asymptotically independent/dependent risks. Some explicit asymptotic formulas are derived, demonstrating that the capital allocated to a specific line is asymptotically proportional to the Value at Risk of the corresponding individual risk. In addition, some numerical studies are conducted to examine their accuracy.