Pub Date : 2022-01-21DOI: 10.1080/00665983.2021.2013604
J. Haslam
within the series of all known surviving barns (mostly in the south east of England but including one in Yorkshire). In this way, the technological advances of the Wheat over the Barley Barn can be better appreciated, although Stenning maintains that developments demonstrate a ‘marked similarity of approach’, the main differences relating to size rather than detail. Even so, and most interestingly, the fifteen barns discussed do suggest two traditions at play. The ‘distinctive multiple triangulation of the trusses’ at the Barley Barn appears to relate more to a north European methodology, while others (such as the Great Coxwell Barn, Oxfordshire) seem to be more closely related to the mainstream French carpentry style. The Wheat Barn fuses some elements of both traditions. The fact that most of the barns were the work of monastic orders that were part of active European networks and, also, given that these barns were probably the product of ‘standard, workshop, laybrother practice’ (craftsmen brothers were a feature of Templar organization) will largely explain this application of continental practice to local situations (quotes from pp. 105–6). Other essays, little altered, have weathered the test of time. Oliver Rackham notes that, although the Barley and Wheat Barns represent an occupancy of woodland comparable to half and one-third of a cathedral respectively, they are made up of relatively small timbers, probably produced on locally managed coppiced woodlands together with some large hedgerow trees. Ian Tyers’s important note on tree-ring dating, which underlines the difficulties of working in a county of largely fast-grown trees, has been updated by John Walker and is reviewed at some length by Tyers in the completely new chapter on the seventeenth-century Granary (which incorporates re-used medieval timber), where some of Rackham’s earlier conclusions are refined. Other buildings are covered afresh while the brick and tile chronology by Pat Ryan and David Andrew still provides (as was noticed in a review of the first edition) ‘a model of how to set about such a typology’. Overall, the wealth of detailed analysis and new graphics makes this an important source for the understanding of thirteenth-century timber construction and site development over a longer period. It is also commendable in terms of accessibility, coming in at a price that in real terms is less than was charged when the original book was published in 1994.
{"title":"Excavations at Oxford castle 1999-2009","authors":"J. Haslam","doi":"10.1080/00665983.2021.2013604","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.2021.2013604","url":null,"abstract":"within the series of all known surviving barns (mostly in the south east of England but including one in Yorkshire). In this way, the technological advances of the Wheat over the Barley Barn can be better appreciated, although Stenning maintains that developments demonstrate a ‘marked similarity of approach’, the main differences relating to size rather than detail. Even so, and most interestingly, the fifteen barns discussed do suggest two traditions at play. The ‘distinctive multiple triangulation of the trusses’ at the Barley Barn appears to relate more to a north European methodology, while others (such as the Great Coxwell Barn, Oxfordshire) seem to be more closely related to the mainstream French carpentry style. The Wheat Barn fuses some elements of both traditions. The fact that most of the barns were the work of monastic orders that were part of active European networks and, also, given that these barns were probably the product of ‘standard, workshop, laybrother practice’ (craftsmen brothers were a feature of Templar organization) will largely explain this application of continental practice to local situations (quotes from pp. 105–6). Other essays, little altered, have weathered the test of time. Oliver Rackham notes that, although the Barley and Wheat Barns represent an occupancy of woodland comparable to half and one-third of a cathedral respectively, they are made up of relatively small timbers, probably produced on locally managed coppiced woodlands together with some large hedgerow trees. Ian Tyers’s important note on tree-ring dating, which underlines the difficulties of working in a county of largely fast-grown trees, has been updated by John Walker and is reviewed at some length by Tyers in the completely new chapter on the seventeenth-century Granary (which incorporates re-used medieval timber), where some of Rackham’s earlier conclusions are refined. Other buildings are covered afresh while the brick and tile chronology by Pat Ryan and David Andrew still provides (as was noticed in a review of the first edition) ‘a model of how to set about such a typology’. Overall, the wealth of detailed analysis and new graphics makes this an important source for the understanding of thirteenth-century timber construction and site development over a longer period. It is also commendable in terms of accessibility, coming in at a price that in real terms is less than was charged when the original book was published in 1994.","PeriodicalId":44491,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88799729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-11DOI: 10.1080/00665983.2021.2013611
Gavin Speed
Published in Archaeological Journal (Vol. 179, No. 2, 2022)
发表于《考古学报》（第 179 卷，第 2 期，2022 年）
{"title":"Roman and medieval Exeter and their hinterlands from, Isca to Excester, edited by Stephen Rippon and Neil Holbrook, Oxford, Oxbow Books (Exeter: a place in time 1/Exeter Archaeological Report 7), 2021, xxii and 394 pp., Illus. 166, £35.00 (Hardback), ISBN 978-1789256154. Studies in the Roman and Medieval Archaeology of Exeter, edited by Stephen Rippon and Neil Holbrook, Oxford, Oxbow Books (Exeter: a place in time 2/Exeter Archaeological Report 8), 2021, xxiv and 638 pp., Illus. 377, £35.00 (Hardback), ISBN 978-1789256192","authors":"Gavin Speed","doi":"10.1080/00665983.2021.2013611","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.2021.2013611","url":null,"abstract":"Published in Archaeological Journal (Vol. 179, No. 2, 2022)","PeriodicalId":44491,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138547617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-05DOI: 10.1080/00665983.2021.1990500
Sophia Adams
number of completely excavated examples. Ray and Thomas describe different buildings at Dorstone Hill which in turn develop into different forms of long mounds. They interpret this as evidence of different lineages coming together to create different versions of the shift from house to mound. Kenny, in her contribution, provides a specific example of direct connection between the evolving architecture of Trefignath chambered tomb and the house at Parc Cybi. House and tomb were connected in ongoing relationship as they both shared an alignment related to spring sunrise. By contrast, Smyth describes a different example of connections between an earlier house and a long mound at Ballyglass. Here there was no common alignment and it is likely that the ultimate form of the court tomb was related to the needs of the living rather than being a house for the dead. Healy uses her final discussion chapter to make the point that the variety of ways that the earlier chapters find to evaluate the differences and connections between houses and tombs may be the result of underlying principles of communal labour, communal gatherings and indeed common technologies. More broadly, connections of form or practice between tombs and houses can be seen to be meaningful but were rarely formulaic. The strength of this volume lies in the way that these local, contingent histories are brought out so that the kind of principles to which Healy refers can be appreciated.
{"title":"La parure en métal de l’âge du Bronze moyen atlantique. (XVe – XIVe siècles avant notre ère)","authors":"Sophia Adams","doi":"10.1080/00665983.2021.1990500","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.2021.1990500","url":null,"abstract":"number of completely excavated examples. Ray and Thomas describe different buildings at Dorstone Hill which in turn develop into different forms of long mounds. They interpret this as evidence of different lineages coming together to create different versions of the shift from house to mound. Kenny, in her contribution, provides a specific example of direct connection between the evolving architecture of Trefignath chambered tomb and the house at Parc Cybi. House and tomb were connected in ongoing relationship as they both shared an alignment related to spring sunrise. By contrast, Smyth describes a different example of connections between an earlier house and a long mound at Ballyglass. Here there was no common alignment and it is likely that the ultimate form of the court tomb was related to the needs of the living rather than being a house for the dead. Healy uses her final discussion chapter to make the point that the variety of ways that the earlier chapters find to evaluate the differences and connections between houses and tombs may be the result of underlying principles of communal labour, communal gatherings and indeed common technologies. More broadly, connections of form or practice between tombs and houses can be seen to be meaningful but were rarely formulaic. The strength of this volume lies in the way that these local, contingent histories are brought out so that the kind of principles to which Healy refers can be appreciated.","PeriodicalId":44491,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72397863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1080/00665983.2022.2090675
Craig Cessford, Benjamin Neil
The Austin friars in Cambridge was an important religious institution between the late thirteenth and mid-sixteenth centuries. Excavations have revealed well-dated and contextualised burials associated with the friary, as well as a range of material culture. The burials have been subject to a wide range of analyses including osteology, palaeopathology, stable isotopes, ancient DNA and geometric morphometrics. Significantly the distinction between clothed and shrouded burials allows members of the Augustinian order and the laity to be identified. This represents the best-understood published group of burials from an Austin friars in the British Isles and emphasises the importance of nuanced interpretation, as burial at friaries was a structured and multi-local phenomenon. These burials and other material can be interpreted in terms of both mendicant ideals and anti-fraternal criticisms.
{"title":"The people of the Cambridge Austin friars.","authors":"Craig Cessford, Benjamin Neil","doi":"10.1080/00665983.2022.2090675","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.2022.2090675","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Austin friars in Cambridge was an important religious institution between the late thirteenth and mid-sixteenth centuries. Excavations have revealed well-dated and contextualised burials associated with the friary, as well as a range of material culture. The burials have been subject to a wide range of analyses including osteology, palaeopathology, stable isotopes, ancient DNA and geometric morphometrics. Significantly the distinction between clothed and shrouded burials allows members of the Augustinian order and the laity to be identified. This represents the best-understood published group of burials from an Austin friars in the British Isles and emphasises the importance of nuanced interpretation, as burial at friaries was a structured and multi-local phenomenon. These burials and other material can be interpreted in terms of both mendicant ideals and anti-fraternal criticisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":44491,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9580237/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10071350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-15DOI: 10.1080/00665983.2021.2013601
Angela Boyle
narrative of the site’s evolution and its significance in the wider context of Worcestershire’s archaeology. Although well written, it would benefit from a map depicting the location of the postulated Iron Age enclosure. The author suggests that Ditch 1 represents the northern extent of a large enclosure, which is referred to as being evident from aerial photographs. Overall the book achieves the aim of publishing the results of the excavation in an engaging and informative way.
{"title":"Lost lives, new voices: unlocking the stories of the Scottish soldiers at the Battle of Dunbar 1650","authors":"Angela Boyle","doi":"10.1080/00665983.2021.2013601","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.2021.2013601","url":null,"abstract":"narrative of the site’s evolution and its significance in the wider context of Worcestershire’s archaeology. Although well written, it would benefit from a map depicting the location of the postulated Iron Age enclosure. The author suggests that Ditch 1 represents the northern extent of a large enclosure, which is referred to as being evident from aerial photographs. Overall the book achieves the aim of publishing the results of the excavation in an engaging and informative way.","PeriodicalId":44491,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87455698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-10DOI: 10.1080/00665983.2021.2015132
Cai Mason
Gloucester Cathedral is a remarkable building. Built as a Benedictine abbey between AD 1089 and the early twelfth century, it is one of England’s finest examples of Romanesque architecture, which retains most of its original layout, and although partially concealed, much of its original fabric. Heighway served as the cathedral’s archaeological consultant for almost 30 years, during which time numerous architectural surveys and small-scale archaeological excavations were undertaken in and around the cathedral. This book draws together the results of these disparate records, with the aims of producing a detailed reconstruction the Norman abbey’s original appearance, and to highlight just how much of its original fabric survives. The book is divided into seven chapters. The first four describe the surviving Romanesque fabric in different areas of the building. Subsequent chapters explore the use of painted colour decoration, traces of which survive in the choir; and detail the surviving Romanesque carvings. The penultimate chapter explores that wider context of the abbey and the relationships between its architecture and those of analogous churches, both locally and in the wider Norman cultural sphere. The book is heavily illustrated with colour and monochrome photographs of extant structural elements, and detailed line drawn elevations and plans of the reconstructed abbey. Where there is debate or ambiguity as to the form of certain elements (e.g. the form of western entrance and presence of Westwork towers, pp. 64–72, or the size and positions of the clerestory windows of the choir, pp. 22–23), the arguments for various interpretations are clearly presented. The book could have benefited from a full elevation of the east/west axis of the abbey in its entirety, however this omission is counterbalanced by the inclusion of R. Bryant’s perspective reconstruction (Fig. 128, p. 106), which provides an excellent overall impression of the abbey as it may have originally appeared. The book is accessible and clearly designed to appeal to a wide audience, however some of the architectural terminology can be quite technical, and a glossary of these terms would help the lay reader. These minor quibbles aside, Heighway and Bryant’s book succeeds admirably in its aims of creating the fullest possible reconstruction of this incredible building and encouraging an appreciation of the surviving remains. This book serves as a model for what can be achieved when hard-won, though often very inaccessible, architectural and archaeological surveys of the nation’s great churches are synthesized and analysed, though few who undertake this task will be as blessed with the wealth of surviving Romanesque fabric that presents itself at Gloucester Cathedral.
{"title":"The Romanesque Abbey of St Peter at Gloucester","authors":"Cai Mason","doi":"10.1080/00665983.2021.2015132","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.2021.2015132","url":null,"abstract":"Gloucester Cathedral is a remarkable building. Built as a Benedictine abbey between AD 1089 and the early twelfth century, it is one of England’s finest examples of Romanesque architecture, which retains most of its original layout, and although partially concealed, much of its original fabric. Heighway served as the cathedral’s archaeological consultant for almost 30 years, during which time numerous architectural surveys and small-scale archaeological excavations were undertaken in and around the cathedral. This book draws together the results of these disparate records, with the aims of producing a detailed reconstruction the Norman abbey’s original appearance, and to highlight just how much of its original fabric survives. The book is divided into seven chapters. The first four describe the surviving Romanesque fabric in different areas of the building. Subsequent chapters explore the use of painted colour decoration, traces of which survive in the choir; and detail the surviving Romanesque carvings. The penultimate chapter explores that wider context of the abbey and the relationships between its architecture and those of analogous churches, both locally and in the wider Norman cultural sphere. The book is heavily illustrated with colour and monochrome photographs of extant structural elements, and detailed line drawn elevations and plans of the reconstructed abbey. Where there is debate or ambiguity as to the form of certain elements (e.g. the form of western entrance and presence of Westwork towers, pp. 64–72, or the size and positions of the clerestory windows of the choir, pp. 22–23), the arguments for various interpretations are clearly presented. The book could have benefited from a full elevation of the east/west axis of the abbey in its entirety, however this omission is counterbalanced by the inclusion of R. Bryant’s perspective reconstruction (Fig. 128, p. 106), which provides an excellent overall impression of the abbey as it may have originally appeared. The book is accessible and clearly designed to appeal to a wide audience, however some of the architectural terminology can be quite technical, and a glossary of these terms would help the lay reader. These minor quibbles aside, Heighway and Bryant’s book succeeds admirably in its aims of creating the fullest possible reconstruction of this incredible building and encouraging an appreciation of the surviving remains. This book serves as a model for what can be achieved when hard-won, though often very inaccessible, architectural and archaeological surveys of the nation’s great churches are synthesized and analysed, though few who undertake this task will be as blessed with the wealth of surviving Romanesque fabric that presents itself at Gloucester Cathedral.","PeriodicalId":44491,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79336095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-10DOI: 10.1080/00665983.2021.2013602
P. Davenport
fifth century, the site became the focus of rubbish disposal from the nearby settlement. The next sections in the book are specialist reports on the material culture of Roman date ranging from assemblages of pottery, glass, ceramic building materials, and worked stone, to human bone and animal remains. The examination of all material encountered in the excavation is very thorough, and it includes a brief report on a small amount of prehistoric and post-Roman pottery, as well as an overview of chipped stone lithics from the Mesolithic to later Bronze Age periods. Returning to the evidence for Roman burials along the road, I would like to flag up the particularly interesting cremation burial. This is a bustum burial of the early third century AD, in which the body was burned on a structure directly above a rectangular pit, with the cremated human remains and pyre material falling into it. This type of Roman cremation burial is relatively rare in Britain, and the third century is very late for this type of rite. The osteological analysis demonstrated that this was a mature adult, but the sex of the individual could not be determined from the surviving bone. Cool, however, argues persuasively in Chapter 7 that the dress accessories burnt with the body indicate that the deceased was a Roman soldier, clothed in military dress with a tunic, a belt with metal fittings, a cloak fastened with a brooch, and hobnailed shoes. The man probably was connected with the fort at Malton on the opposite riverbank, revealing that soldiers were not always interred in cemeteries immediately surrounding a fort. This is a very rare case of a soldier cremated in full military dress and with his equipment, making this particular find one of international significance. The finds, contexts, and structures are meticulously presented and illustrated throughout. The volume will be of value to anyone interested in exploring Roman military and civilian settlements, connectivity in the landscape during the Roman period, and the burial practices and rites of people living here in Yorkshire, especially in the third century AD.
{"title":"The Roman Baths at Wallsend","authors":"P. Davenport","doi":"10.1080/00665983.2021.2013602","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.2021.2013602","url":null,"abstract":"fifth century, the site became the focus of rubbish disposal from the nearby settlement. The next sections in the book are specialist reports on the material culture of Roman date ranging from assemblages of pottery, glass, ceramic building materials, and worked stone, to human bone and animal remains. The examination of all material encountered in the excavation is very thorough, and it includes a brief report on a small amount of prehistoric and post-Roman pottery, as well as an overview of chipped stone lithics from the Mesolithic to later Bronze Age periods. Returning to the evidence for Roman burials along the road, I would like to flag up the particularly interesting cremation burial. This is a bustum burial of the early third century AD, in which the body was burned on a structure directly above a rectangular pit, with the cremated human remains and pyre material falling into it. This type of Roman cremation burial is relatively rare in Britain, and the third century is very late for this type of rite. The osteological analysis demonstrated that this was a mature adult, but the sex of the individual could not be determined from the surviving bone. Cool, however, argues persuasively in Chapter 7 that the dress accessories burnt with the body indicate that the deceased was a Roman soldier, clothed in military dress with a tunic, a belt with metal fittings, a cloak fastened with a brooch, and hobnailed shoes. The man probably was connected with the fort at Malton on the opposite riverbank, revealing that soldiers were not always interred in cemeteries immediately surrounding a fort. This is a very rare case of a soldier cremated in full military dress and with his equipment, making this particular find one of international significance. The finds, contexts, and structures are meticulously presented and illustrated throughout. The volume will be of value to anyone interested in exploring Roman military and civilian settlements, connectivity in the landscape during the Roman period, and the burial practices and rites of people living here in Yorkshire, especially in the third century AD.","PeriodicalId":44491,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85476237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-10DOI: 10.1080/00665983.2021.2013610
R. Peterson
{"title":"Houses of the dead?","authors":"R. Peterson","doi":"10.1080/00665983.2021.2013610","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.2021.2013610","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44491,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88718928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-08DOI: 10.1080/00665983.2021.1990574
M. Cherry
{"title":"Cressing temple. A Templar and Hospitaller manor in Essex and its building","authors":"M. Cherry","doi":"10.1080/00665983.2021.1990574","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.2021.1990574","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44491,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82374293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-06DOI: 10.1080/00665983.2021.1990577
John Thomas
of advance the highly detailed, but very readable
提前的非常详细，但非常可读
{"title":"Medieval to modern suburban material culture and sequence at Grand Arcade, Cambridge: archaeological investigations of an Eleventh to Twentieth-Century suburb and town ditch","authors":"John Thomas","doi":"10.1080/00665983.2021.1990577","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.2021.1990577","url":null,"abstract":"of advance the highly detailed, but very readable","PeriodicalId":44491,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78929034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：