Background Although surgical drains are widely used after lower gastrointestinal (GI) procedures, complications may occur. Specifically, sporadic cases of drain migration into a hollow viscus, most commonly regarding active drains and treated with surgical removal, have been reported. Herein, we present a case of a passive drain (penrose) migration into the colon, after segmental sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis, presented with hematochezia. Methods A 37-year-old male patient suffering from colovesical fistula, due to sigmoid diverticulitis, underwent resection of the fistula, the involved sigmoid segment and the bladder opening, followed by primary anastomosis of the colon and primary closure of the bladder. A penrose catheter was positioned near the anastomosis. Results On 8th postoperative day (POD) the patient had three episodes of hematochezia and blood in the drain collection bag, followed by relative improvement. On 15th POD gas was observed on the drain's collection bag and a new episode of hematochezia led him to sigmoidoscopy. The endoscopy revealed the presence of the penrose drain intraluminally, protruding via an ulcer at the level of the anastomosis. The penrose repositioned outside the lumen and metallic clips were used to approximate the defect. The patient was then fully recovered, discharged, and the drain removed on follow-up. Conclusion To our knowledge this is the first report of drain migration presented with hematochezia, after lower GI surgery, avoided reoperation, and resolved with removal of the drain under direct endoscopic vision.
{"title":"Intraluminal Migration of a Penrose Drain Presented with Hematochezia, after Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery.","authors":"Roza Mourelatou, Christos Liatsos, Angeliki Bistaraki, Efstathios Nikou","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1757603","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757603","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Although surgical drains are widely used after lower gastrointestinal (GI) procedures, complications may occur. Specifically, sporadic cases of drain migration into a hollow viscus, most commonly regarding active drains and treated with surgical removal, have been reported. Herein, we present a case of a passive drain (penrose) migration into the colon, after segmental sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis, presented with hematochezia. <b>Methods</b> A 37-year-old male patient suffering from colovesical fistula, due to sigmoid diverticulitis, underwent resection of the fistula, the involved sigmoid segment and the bladder opening, followed by primary anastomosis of the colon and primary closure of the bladder. A penrose catheter was positioned near the anastomosis. <b>Results</b> On 8th postoperative day (POD) the patient had three episodes of hematochezia and blood in the drain collection bag, followed by relative improvement. On 15th POD gas was observed on the drain's collection bag and a new episode of hematochezia led him to sigmoidoscopy. The endoscopy revealed the presence of the penrose drain intraluminally, protruding via an ulcer at the level of the anastomosis. The penrose repositioned outside the lumen and metallic clips were used to approximate the defect. The patient was then fully recovered, discharged, and the drain removed on follow-up. <b>Conclusion</b> To our knowledge this is the first report of drain migration presented with hematochezia, after lower GI surgery, avoided reoperation, and resolved with removal of the drain under direct endoscopic vision.</p>","PeriodicalId":44614,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9550314/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33503108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has presented orthopaedic departments around the world with unprecedented challenges across all aspects of health care service delivery. This study explores the effect of the COVID-19 lockdown on trauma admissions and trauma theater utilization at a London District General Hospital. Methods Data was collected retrospectively from electronic patient records for 4 weeks from the initiation of two lockdown periods beginning March 16, 2020 and December 23, 2020. Results were compared with a comparable time period in 2019. Patient age, date of admission, time of admission, date of operation, length of stay, length of operation, type of operation, and length of anesthesia were analyzed. Results Fewer patients were admitted during the COVID-19 period for trauma (108 in 2019 vs. 65 in March 2020 and 77 in December 2020). In addition, there was a significant shift in patient demographics, with the mean age of patients being 55.6 years in 2019 and 64.1 years in March 2020 and December 2020 ( p = 0.038). The most common mechanism of injury in both years was due to falls; however, the proportion of injuries due to falls fell from 75% in 2019 to 62% March 2020, but not significant change from pre-COVID baseline in December 2020 (77% falls). The duration of anesthesia was significantly longer in March 2020 (136 minutes) compared with in 2019 (83 minutes) ( p < 0.00001). There was no statistically significant difference in operation length for each operation type, but there was an overall increase in median operation length of 13.6% in March 2020 from the previous year. Finally, although overall length of stay was roughly constant, the time between admission and operation was significantly reduced in March 2020 (1.22 vs. 4.74 days, p < 0.0000001). Conclusion Orthopaedic trauma remains an essential service which has always had to overcome the challenges of capacity and resources in busy cities like London. Despite the reduction in trauma volume during the COVID-19 lockdown there have still been significant pressures on the health care system due to new challenges in the face of this new disease. By understanding the effects of the lifestyle restrictions brought about by the lockdown on trauma services as well as the impact of COVID-19 on service delivery measures such as length of surgery and stay, health care managers can plan for service delivery in the future as we attempt to return to nonemergency orthopaedic services and move lockdown restrictions are eased.
{"title":"Effect of COVID-19 on Orthopaedic Trauma Admissions and Operating in a London District General Hospital.","authors":"Ubaid Zahoor, Catherine Malik, Hassan Raja, Sruthi Ramaraju, Kesavan Sri-Ram","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1757883","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757883","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has presented orthopaedic departments around the world with unprecedented challenges across all aspects of health care service delivery. This study explores the effect of the COVID-19 lockdown on trauma admissions and trauma theater utilization at a London District General Hospital. <b>Methods</b> Data was collected retrospectively from electronic patient records for 4 weeks from the initiation of two lockdown periods beginning March 16, 2020 and December 23, 2020. Results were compared with a comparable time period in 2019. Patient age, date of admission, time of admission, date of operation, length of stay, length of operation, type of operation, and length of anesthesia were analyzed. <b>Results</b> Fewer patients were admitted during the COVID-19 period for trauma (108 in 2019 vs. 65 in March 2020 and 77 in December 2020). In addition, there was a significant shift in patient demographics, with the mean age of patients being 55.6 years in 2019 and 64.1 years in March 2020 and December 2020 ( <i>p</i> = 0.038). The most common mechanism of injury in both years was due to falls; however, the proportion of injuries due to falls fell from 75% in 2019 to 62% March 2020, but not significant change from pre-COVID baseline in December 2020 (77% falls). The duration of anesthesia was significantly longer in March 2020 (136 minutes) compared with in 2019 (83 minutes) ( <i>p</i> < 0.00001). There was no statistically significant difference in operation length for each operation type, but there was an overall increase in median operation length of 13.6% in March 2020 from the previous year. Finally, although overall length of stay was roughly constant, the time between admission and operation was significantly reduced in March 2020 (1.22 vs. 4.74 days, <i>p</i> < 0.0000001). <b>Conclusion</b> Orthopaedic trauma remains an essential service which has always had to overcome the challenges of capacity and resources in busy cities like London. Despite the reduction in trauma volume during the COVID-19 lockdown there have still been significant pressures on the health care system due to new challenges in the face of this new disease. By understanding the effects of the lifestyle restrictions brought about by the lockdown on trauma services as well as the impact of COVID-19 on service delivery measures such as length of surgery and stay, health care managers can plan for service delivery in the future as we attempt to return to nonemergency orthopaedic services and move lockdown restrictions are eased.</p>","PeriodicalId":44614,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9550317/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33504025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Arun Nair, Matthew Bence, Jawaad Saleem, Azka Yousaf, Lena Al-Hilfi, Kumar Kunasingam
Background Despite advancements in primary correction of hallux valgus (HV), significant rates of reoperation remain across common techniques, with complications following primary correction up to 50% according to some studies. 1 This study explored different methods of surgery currently used in treating HV recurrence specifically (for which literature on the subject has been limited), evaluating open and adapted minimally invasive surgical (MIS) primary techniques used for revision. Methods In December 2020, literature search for both open and MIS surgical techniques in HV revision was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE library databases. Results and Conclusion Of initial 143 publications, 10 were finally included for data synthesis including 273 patients and 301 feet. Out of 301 feet, 80 (26.6%) underwent revision with MIS techniques (involving distal metatarsal osteotomies). Those undergoing grouped MIS revisions had an average improvement of 38.3 in their American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score, compared to 26.8 in those using open techniques. Revision approaches using grouped MIS techniques showed a postoperative reduction in intermetatarsal angle and HV angle of 5.6 and 18.4 degrees, respectively, compared to 15.5 and 4.4 degrees, respectively, for open techniques. There are, however, limitations in the current literature on MIS techniques in revision HV surgery specifically. MIS techniques grouped did not show worse outcomes or safety concerns compared to open techniques.
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery for Treating Recurrent Hallux Valgus.","authors":"Arun Nair, Matthew Bence, Jawaad Saleem, Azka Yousaf, Lena Al-Hilfi, Kumar Kunasingam","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1759812","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1759812","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Despite advancements in primary correction of hallux valgus (HV), significant rates of reoperation remain across common techniques, with complications following primary correction up to 50% according to some studies. 1 This study explored different methods of surgery currently used in treating HV recurrence specifically (for which literature on the subject has been limited), evaluating open and adapted minimally invasive surgical (MIS) primary techniques used for revision. <b>Methods</b> In December 2020, literature search for both open and MIS surgical techniques in HV revision was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE library databases. <b>Results and Conclusion</b> Of initial 143 publications, 10 were finally included for data synthesis including 273 patients and 301 feet. Out of 301 feet, 80 (26.6%) underwent revision with MIS techniques (involving distal metatarsal osteotomies). Those undergoing grouped MIS revisions had an average improvement of 38.3 in their American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score, compared to 26.8 in those using open techniques. Revision approaches using grouped MIS techniques showed a postoperative reduction in intermetatarsal angle and HV angle of 5.6 and 18.4 degrees, respectively, compared to 15.5 and 4.4 degrees, respectively, for open techniques. There are, however, limitations in the current literature on MIS techniques in revision HV surgery specifically. MIS techniques grouped did not show worse outcomes or safety concerns compared to open techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":44614,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9771687/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10428675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Thomas Gatt, Sharon Zammit, Kurt L Chircop, Denise Gatt, Luke Sultana, Terence Micallef, Adriana Grech, Ivan Esposito
The effect of banning of nonessential services during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to a perceived change in the volume of trauma cases and injury patterns. Literature indicates trends toward less trauma overall, with a decrease in outdoor, sporting, and motor vehicle injuries. However, studies focusing on outpatient orthopaedic trauma are less common. The main aim of this study was to assess the effect of COVID-19 pandemic on differences in inpatient and outpatient injury patterns and mechanisms. Patients requiring orthopaedic inpatient admission to Mater Dei Hospital, Malta, were analyzed between March 15 and June 17 between 2019 and 2021. For outpatients, all newly referred patients seen at the fresh trauma clinic (FTC) on the first 5 clinic days of each month from April to June between 2019 and 2021 were assessed. There were a total of 503, 362, and 603 hospital admissions during the data collection period from 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively. There was a decrease in elbow ( p = 0.015) and pelvis ( p = 0.038) pathology since COVID-19 pandemic. In contrast, there was an increase in shoulder injuries ( p = 0.036) and lacerated wounds ( p = 0.012) in 2021. The most frequent mechanisms of injury for inpatients were low impact falls, and fall from heights greater than 1 m. Machine-related injuries ( p = 0.002), blunt trauma ( p = 0.004), and twisting injuries ( p = 0.029) increased in 2021. In the outpatient setting, there were a total of 367, 232, and 299 new referrals in 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. Injury patterns in this cohort were similar throughout, except for a significant increase in shoulder injuries during 2020 ( p = 0.009). There appears to be some minor variation in injury mechanisms due to lifestyle changes; however, most injury patterns have remained fairly constant. Further research should focus on the use of public awareness campaigns to decrease home-related trauma during enforced periods of lockdown.
{"title":"The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Injury Patterns in Inpatient and Outpatient Orthopaedic Trauma.","authors":"Thomas Gatt, Sharon Zammit, Kurt L Chircop, Denise Gatt, Luke Sultana, Terence Micallef, Adriana Grech, Ivan Esposito","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1757427","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757427","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effect of banning of nonessential services during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to a perceived change in the volume of trauma cases and injury patterns. Literature indicates trends toward less trauma overall, with a decrease in outdoor, sporting, and motor vehicle injuries. However, studies focusing on outpatient orthopaedic trauma are less common. The main aim of this study was to assess the effect of COVID-19 pandemic on differences in inpatient and outpatient injury patterns and mechanisms. Patients requiring orthopaedic inpatient admission to Mater Dei Hospital, Malta, were analyzed between March 15 and June 17 between 2019 and 2021. For outpatients, all newly referred patients seen at the fresh trauma clinic (FTC) on the first 5 clinic days of each month from April to June between 2019 and 2021 were assessed. There were a total of 503, 362, and 603 hospital admissions during the data collection period from 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively. There was a decrease in elbow ( <i>p</i> = 0.015) and pelvis ( <i>p</i> = 0.038) pathology since COVID-19 pandemic. In contrast, there was an increase in shoulder injuries ( <i>p</i> = 0.036) and lacerated wounds ( <i>p</i> = 0.012) in 2021. The most frequent mechanisms of injury for inpatients were low impact falls, and fall from heights greater than 1 m. Machine-related injuries ( <i>p</i> = 0.002), blunt trauma ( <i>p</i> = 0.004), and twisting injuries ( <i>p</i> = 0.029) increased in 2021. In the outpatient setting, there were a total of 367, 232, and 299 new referrals in 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. Injury patterns in this cohort were similar throughout, except for a significant increase in shoulder injuries during 2020 ( <i>p</i> = 0.009). There appears to be some minor variation in injury mechanisms due to lifestyle changes; however, most injury patterns have remained fairly constant. Further research should focus on the use of public awareness campaigns to decrease home-related trauma during enforced periods of lockdown.</p>","PeriodicalId":44614,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9792219/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10509843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-26eCollection Date: 2022-07-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757335
Etienne El-Helou, Linda Chamma, Houssam Bashir Mazraani, Delivrance Sebaaly, Omar Georges Chamma, Jessica Naccour, Marwan M Haddad, Dani Lichaa, Houssam Alam
Extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGISTs) are rare mesenchymal tumors accounting for less than 1% of total gastrointestinal tumors. They tend to be aggressive and have a poor prognosis. Unfortunately, there is a lack of data or controversial data due to its scarcity. Therefore, we report a case of pelvic EGIST misdiagnosed as retroperitoneal sarcoma. We opted for surgical management followed by adjuvant oral chemotherapy with imatinib.
{"title":"Extra-Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (EGIST) in the Pelvis Mimicking Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.","authors":"Etienne El-Helou, Linda Chamma, Houssam Bashir Mazraani, Delivrance Sebaaly, Omar Georges Chamma, Jessica Naccour, Marwan M Haddad, Dani Lichaa, Houssam Alam","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1757335","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757335","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGISTs) are rare mesenchymal tumors accounting for less than 1% of total gastrointestinal tumors. They tend to be aggressive and have a poor prognosis. Unfortunately, there is a lack of data or controversial data due to its scarcity. Therefore, we report a case of pelvic EGIST misdiagnosed as retroperitoneal sarcoma. We opted for surgical management followed by adjuvant oral chemotherapy with imatinib.</p>","PeriodicalId":44614,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9512592/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40381403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-19eCollection Date: 2022-07-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1743516
Mahendra Pratap Singh, Tanweerul Huda
The mucocele of the appendix can be described as an obstructive dilatation of the appendix by an intraluminal accumulation of mucus. A 60-year-old diabetic male patient presented with chief complains of pain in right lower abdomen for the past 2 months which was dull in nature, not associated with fever, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, or any urinary complains. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the abdomen revealed appendiceal lumen distended, filled with fluid collection. There was abrupt narrowing seen at its junction with cecum. Features were suggestive of appendicular mucocele. The patient was taken up for exploratory laparotomy, and a distended turgid appendix, around 4 cm in diameter with dilated cecum, was found. Ileocecal resection was done followed by ileo-ascending colon side-to-side anastomosis using staplers. The histopathological examination report revealed an R0 resection. The patient was followed up for 3 years postoperatively with CECT of the abdomen and a colonoscopy yearly. There was no evidence of any recurrence in the follow-up.
{"title":"Mucocele of the Appendix: A Presentation.","authors":"Mahendra Pratap Singh, Tanweerul Huda","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1743516","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1743516","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The mucocele of the appendix can be described as an obstructive dilatation of the appendix by an intraluminal accumulation of mucus. A 60-year-old diabetic male patient presented with chief complains of pain in right lower abdomen for the past 2 months which was dull in nature, not associated with fever, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, or any urinary complains. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the abdomen revealed appendiceal lumen distended, filled with fluid collection. There was abrupt narrowing seen at its junction with cecum. Features were suggestive of appendicular mucocele. The patient was taken up for exploratory laparotomy, and a distended turgid appendix, around 4 cm in diameter with dilated cecum, was found. Ileocecal resection was done followed by ileo-ascending colon side-to-side anastomosis using staplers. The histopathological examination report revealed an R0 resection. The patient was followed up for 3 years postoperatively with CECT of the abdomen and a colonoscopy yearly. There was no evidence of any recurrence in the follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":44614,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484873/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33467012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-19eCollection Date: 2022-07-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756183
Steffen Sauer, Gitte Karlsen, Lene Miller, Jens Ole Storm
Background Medial plica syndrome is a commonly overlooked cause of anterior knee pain. A consensus on diagnosis and treatment is yet to be found. This study compares the clinical outcome of arthroscopic plica resection with structured physiotherapy for patients with isolated medial plica syndrome in a prospective randomized controlled trial with a 2-year follow-up. Methods Forty-eight patients have been included in this prospective randomized controlled trial presenting medial plica syndrome. Patients were randomly assigned to either arthroscopic plica resection or structured physiotherapy. The primary outcome was the change in the average score of the Lysholm knee scoring scale from baseline to 2-year follow-up. Results Mean baseline Lysholm score for patients assigned to arthroscopic plica resection and physiotherapy was 65.8 and 66.3, respectively. No significant difference was seen between the two groups. Thirty-three patients were assessed at 2 years follow up. The mean Lysholm score was 89.7 for patients assigned to arthroscopic plica resection and 74.6 for patients assigned to structured physiotherapy. A statistically significant difference was seen between the two groups (p = 0.007). Conclusions Arthroscopic plica resection was associated with significantly greater clinical improvement compared with physiotherapy at 2-year follow-up.
{"title":"Medial Plica Syndrome of the Knee: Arthroscopic Plica Resection versus Structured Physiotherapy-A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Steffen Sauer, Gitte Karlsen, Lene Miller, Jens Ole Storm","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1756183","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756183","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Medial plica syndrome is a commonly overlooked cause of anterior knee pain. A consensus on diagnosis and treatment is yet to be found. This study compares the clinical outcome of arthroscopic plica resection with structured physiotherapy for patients with isolated medial plica syndrome in a prospective randomized controlled trial with a 2-year follow-up. <b>Methods</b> Forty-eight patients have been included in this prospective randomized controlled trial presenting medial plica syndrome. Patients were randomly assigned to either arthroscopic plica resection or structured physiotherapy. The primary outcome was the change in the average score of the Lysholm knee scoring scale from baseline to 2-year follow-up. <b>Results</b> Mean baseline Lysholm score for patients assigned to arthroscopic plica resection and physiotherapy was 65.8 and 66.3, respectively. No significant difference was seen between the two groups. Thirty-three patients were assessed at 2 years follow up. The mean Lysholm score was 89.7 for patients assigned to arthroscopic plica resection and 74.6 for patients assigned to structured physiotherapy. A statistically significant difference was seen between the two groups (p = 0.007). <b>Conclusions</b> Arthroscopic plica resection was associated with significantly greater clinical improvement compared with physiotherapy at 2-year follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":44614,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484868/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33467011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-19eCollection Date: 2022-07-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1755621
Cees T Whisonant, Shawhin R K Shahriari, Casey McDonald, Tyler Hough, Amanda C Ederle, Gregory L Borah
Introduction Matching into an orthopaedic surgery residency program presents a challenging accomplishment for applicants to achieve in any given year. Due to the profound changes to the application process caused by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic it was theorized that there would be a change in the number of graduates matching close to their home medical school region, state, and program. Methods Orthopaedic surgery residency program Web sites and social media accounts were accessed to elucidate current resident data, including graduates' medical school, and geographical location of their school. Chi-square analysis was performed to identify trends in current residents matching within their home program, state, and region associated with the 2021 orthopaedic match. These numbers were compared with previous year's successful applicants. Results In 2021, a significant 4.4% ( p =0.02) increase in successful matches within applicants' home states occurred (33.4% vs. 37.8%) and home programs ( p <0.001) when compared with previous years (21.2% vs. 27.4%). However, in 2021, there was no significant change in home region matching ( p =0.56) with 60% of successful matches occurring in home regions. This was statistically consistent with what was observed in previous years (61.4%). Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with restrictions in travel and interview options resulting in a significant increase in the number of orthopaedic applicants who matched into their home program, or at programs in their home state compared with previous years. Although no statistically significant regional change occurred during the 2021 match, it remains the leading predictor of where successful applicants will match. With many unknowns related to the upcoming match cycles it is important for applicants and programs to have a general idea of recent trends and outcomes to best focus their efforts, especially if diversity and minority inclusion are considered in highly competitive specialties like orthopaedic surgery.
在任何一年中,匹配到骨科住院医师项目对申请人来说都是一项具有挑战性的成就。由于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对申请流程造成了深刻的变化,理论上,与他们的家乡医学院地区、州和项目匹配的毕业生数量将会发生变化。方法通过访问骨科住院医师项目网站和社交媒体账户,了解目前住院医师的资料,包括毕业生就读的医学院和所在学校的地理位置。进行卡方分析以确定与2021年骨科匹配相关的当前住院医师在其家庭项目、州和地区的匹配趋势。这些数字与前一年的成功申请者进行了比较。结果:2021年,申请人所在州(33.4% vs. 37.8%)和本地项目(p =0.56)的成功匹配率显著增加4.4% (p =0.02),其中60%的成功匹配发生在申请人所在地区。这与前几年的观察结果(61.4%)在统计学上是一致的。与前几年相比,COVID-19大流行与旅行和面试选择限制有关,导致与家乡项目或家乡项目相匹配的骨科申请人数量显著增加。尽管在2021年的匹配中没有发生统计学上显著的区域变化,但它仍然是成功申请者匹配的主要预测指标。由于与即将到来的匹配周期相关的许多未知因素,对于申请人和项目来说,了解最近的趋势和结果是很重要的,这样才能最好地集中精力,特别是在骨科等竞争激烈的专业中,如果考虑到多样性和少数族裔的纳入,就更重要了。
{"title":"The Impact of COVID-19 on the Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Match.","authors":"Cees T Whisonant, Shawhin R K Shahriari, Casey McDonald, Tyler Hough, Amanda C Ederle, Gregory L Borah","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1755621","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1755621","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b> Matching into an orthopaedic surgery residency program presents a challenging accomplishment for applicants to achieve in any given year. Due to the profound changes to the application process caused by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic it was theorized that there would be a change in the number of graduates matching close to their home medical school region, state, and program. <b>Methods</b> Orthopaedic surgery residency program Web sites and social media accounts were accessed to elucidate current resident data, including graduates' medical school, and geographical location of their school. Chi-square analysis was performed to identify trends in current residents matching within their home program, state, and region associated with the 2021 orthopaedic match. These numbers were compared with previous year's successful applicants. <b>Results</b> In 2021, a significant 4.4% ( <i>p</i> =0.02) increase in successful matches within applicants' home states occurred (33.4% vs. 37.8%) and home programs ( <i>p</i> <0.001) when compared with previous years (21.2% vs. 27.4%). However, in 2021, there was no significant change in home region matching ( <i>p</i> =0.56) with 60% of successful matches occurring in home regions. This was statistically consistent with what was observed in previous years (61.4%). <b>Conclusion</b> The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with restrictions in travel and interview options resulting in a significant increase in the number of orthopaedic applicants who matched into their home program, or at programs in their home state compared with previous years. Although no statistically significant regional change occurred during the 2021 match, it remains the leading predictor of where successful applicants will match. With many unknowns related to the upcoming match cycles it is important for applicants and programs to have a general idea of recent trends and outcomes to best focus their efforts, especially if diversity and minority inclusion are considered in highly competitive specialties like orthopaedic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":44614,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484865/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33467013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-19eCollection Date: 2022-07-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756632
Michael J Ramdass, Joshua Gonzales, Dale Maharaj, Donald Simeon, Shaheeba Barrow
Trinidad and Tobago are islands in the Southern Caribbean with a unique mix of races within the population consisting of East Indian (EI) (37.6%), Afro-Caribbean (AC) (36.3%), mixed (24.2%), and Caucasian, Chinese, Lebanese, Syrian, Amerindian, and Spanish groups accounting for 1.9%. It makes it suitable for a comparison of breast carcinoma receptor expression within a fixed environment. This study included 257 women with an age range of 28 to 93 years (mean = 57.2, standard deviation = 15.0), peak age group of 51 to 60 consisting of 105 EI, 119 AC, and 33 mixed descent. Invasive ductal carcinoma accounted for 88%, invasive lobular 9.7%, and ductal carcinoma in situ 2.3%. The triple-negative rates were 24.8, 33.6, and 30.3% for EI, AC, and mixed races, respectively, with the Pearson's chi-square test revealing statistical significance for the AC versus EI ( p < 0.001); AC versus mixed ( p < 0.001); and EI versus mixed ( p = 0.014) groups. The overall estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), and human epidermal growth receptor (HER) expression negative rates were 52, 64, and 79%, respectively. Chi-square test of the following combinations: ER +/PR +/HER + ; ER +/PR +/HER - ; ER -/PR -/HER + ; ER +/PR -/HER + ; ER +/PR -/HER - ; ER -/PR +/HER + ; ER -/PR +/HER- revealed no statistical differences ( p = 0.689).
特立尼达和多巴哥是南加勒比海的岛屿,人口中有独特的种族混合,包括东印度人(EI)(37.6%),非洲-加勒比人(AC)(36.3%),混合(24.2%),高加索人,中国人,黎巴嫩人,叙利亚人,美洲印第安人和西班牙人,占1.9%。这使得它适合于在固定环境中比较乳腺癌受体的表达。本研究纳入257名女性,年龄范围为28 ~ 93岁(平均57.2岁,标准差15.0),高峰年龄组为51 ~ 60岁,EI患者105例,AC患者119例,混合血统患者33例。浸润性导管癌占88%,浸润性小叶癌占9.7%,导管原位癌占2.3%。EI、AC和混合人种的三阴性率分别为24.8%、33.6%和30.3%,Pearson卡方检验显示AC组与EI组的三阴性率具有统计学意义(p p p = 0.014)。雌激素(ER)、孕激素(PR)和人表皮生长受体(HER)的总表达阴性率分别为52%、64%和79%。ER +/PR +/HER +组合的卡方检验;er +/ pr +/ her -;er -/ pr -/ her +;er +/ pr -/ her +;er +/ pr -/ her -;er -/ pr +/ her +;ER- /PR +/HER-差异无统计学意义(p = 0.689)。
{"title":"Breast Carcinoma Receptor Expression in a Caribbean Population.","authors":"Michael J Ramdass, Joshua Gonzales, Dale Maharaj, Donald Simeon, Shaheeba Barrow","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1756632","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756632","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trinidad and Tobago are islands in the Southern Caribbean with a unique mix of races within the population consisting of East Indian (EI) (37.6%), Afro-Caribbean (AC) (36.3%), mixed (24.2%), and Caucasian, Chinese, Lebanese, Syrian, Amerindian, and Spanish groups accounting for 1.9%. It makes it suitable for a comparison of breast carcinoma receptor expression within a fixed environment. This study included 257 women with an age range of 28 to 93 years (mean = 57.2, standard deviation = 15.0), peak age group of 51 to 60 consisting of 105 EI, 119 AC, and 33 mixed descent. Invasive ductal carcinoma accounted for 88%, invasive lobular 9.7%, and ductal carcinoma in situ 2.3%. The triple-negative rates were 24.8, 33.6, and 30.3% for EI, AC, and mixed races, respectively, with the Pearson's chi-square test revealing statistical significance for the AC versus EI ( <i>p</i> < 0.001); AC versus mixed ( <i>p</i> < 0.001); and EI versus mixed ( <i>p</i> = 0.014) groups. The overall estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), and human epidermal growth receptor (HER) expression negative rates were 52, 64, and 79%, respectively. Chi-square test of the following combinations: ER +/PR +/HER + ; ER +/PR +/HER - ; ER -/PR -/HER + ; ER +/PR -/HER + ; ER +/PR -/HER - ; ER -/PR +/HER + ; ER -/PR +/HER- revealed no statistical differences ( <i>p</i> = 0.689).</p>","PeriodicalId":44614,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484866/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33467010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}