首页 > 最新文献

JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques最新文献

英文 中文
Endoscopic Flexor Hallucis Longus Tendon Transfer for the Treatment of Chronic Achilles Tendon Defects. 内窥镜下拇长屈肌腱转移治疗慢性跟腱缺损。
IF 1 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00075
Andrew Rust, Logan Roebke, Kevin D Martin
<p><strong>Background: </strong>An all-inside endoscopic flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon transfer is indicated for the treatment of chronic, full-thickness Achilles tendon defects. The aim of this procedure is to restore function of the gastrocnemius-soleus complex while avoiding the wound complications associated with open procedures.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>This procedure can be performed through 2 endoscopic portals, a posteromedial portal (the working portal) and a posterolateral portal (the visualization portal). The FHL tendon is identified, and the joint capsule is debrided to identify the subtalar joint. A shaver is utilized to circumferentially debride the FHL at the level of the subtalar joint, allowing for full visualization of the tendon. Care is taken to avoid the posteromedial neurovascular bundle by keeping the shaver against the tendon. An endoscopic suture-passing device is utilized to pierce the FHL tendon and shuttle a nonabsorbable suture through the tendon; this step is done 2 times. The tendon is then cut at its distal-most aspect (adjacent to the subtalar joint) with an endoscopic cutter. The tendon is then brought through the posteromedial portal and prepared for transosseous passage with nonabsorbable suture. Next, the anterior insertion of the Achilles tendon is endoscopically identified and debrided. With use of needle endoscopy-targeted pin placement, a Beath pin is placed at the anterior footprint of the Achilles via the posteromedial portal. The pin is advanced dorsal to plantar and out the bottom of the foot and is confirmed on fluoroscopy. With use of an appropriately sized reamer, the Beath pin is loaded with the 2 grasping sutures and shuttled plantarly. The needle endoscope is then placed in the posterolateral portal to visualize the FHL tendon, advancing into the tunnel with the foot held in 15° of plantar flexion. An appropriately sized interference screw is then placed in the tunnel, using direct endoscopic visualization to confirm placement and depth of the screw.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Chronic Achilles tendon ruptures with symptomatic weakness often necessitate operative treatment; however, high-risk patients may be better managed nonoperatively with an ankle-foot orthosis. These patients often demonstrate improved gait and function with this orthosis<sup>1</sup>. The choice of operative technique for the treatment of chronic Achilles tendon defects is primarily based on tendon gap length; options include end-to-end repair, fascial advancement, and turn-down procedures with or without transferring the FHL, peroneus brevis, or flexor digitorum longus tendons. These techniques require substantial incisions and violation of the posterior compartments and Achilles paratenon, creating substantial postoperative scarring.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Chronic Achilles tendon ruptures with defects or gaps leave the patient with weakness and biomechanical loss of the gastrocnemius-s
背景:全内窥镜下拇长屈肌(FHL)肌腱转移用于治疗慢性,全层跟腱缺损。该手术的目的是恢复腓肠肌-比目鱼复合体的功能,同时避免与开放手术相关的伤口并发症。描述:该手术可通过2个内镜门静脉进行,一个后内侧门静脉(工作门静脉)和一个后外侧门静脉(可视化门静脉)。确定FHL肌腱,并清除关节囊以确定距下关节。使用剃须刀在距下关节水平向周向清除FHL,使肌腱完全可见。注意要避免后内侧神经血管束,保持剃须刀对肌腱。内窥镜缝合通过装置用于刺穿FHL肌腱并将不可吸收的缝合线穿过肌腱;这个步骤做了2次。然后用内窥镜切割器在肌腱的最远端(距下关节附近)切开。然后将肌腱穿过后内侧门静脉,用不可吸收的缝线为跨骨通道做准备。接下来,内窥镜检查跟腱的前止点并清除。使用内窥镜定位针放置,通过后内侧门静脉将Beath针放置在跟腱的前足迹上。引脚位于足底背部和脚底外,并在透视检查中得到证实。使用适当尺寸的铰刀,Beath针装载2条抓握缝合线并在跖部穿梭。然后将针内窥镜置于门静脉后外侧,观察FHL肌腱,脚保持足底屈曲15°,进入隧道。然后将合适尺寸的干涉螺钉放置在隧道中,使用直接内镜可视化来确定螺钉的位置和深度。备选方案:慢性跟腱断裂伴症状性虚弱通常需要手术治疗;然而,高风险患者可以通过踝足矫形器非手术治疗。使用矫形器后,这些患者通常表现出步态和功能的改善。慢性跟腱缺损手术技术的选择主要基于腱间隙长度;选择包括端到端修复,筋膜推进,以及有或没有转移FHL、腓骨短肌或指长屈肌肌腱的降压手术。这些技术需要大量的切口和侵犯后腔室和跟腱旁腱,造成大量的术后疤痕。理由:慢性跟腱断裂伴缺损或间隙使患者出现腓肠肌-比目鱼肌复合体无力和生物力学丧失。间隙长度决定筋膜推进类型的金标准算法需要长切口和违反后室和副腱。这些重建手术可以恢复腓肠肌-比目鱼肌复合体的张力,但也会导致滑动减少和大量疤痕和增厚。这些切口也容易出现伤口并发症、腓肠神经损伤和疼痛性疤痕。与标准入路相比,全内窥镜FHL肌腱转移有几个优点。全内入路防止侵犯隔室和跟腱,避免疼痛疤痕和肥厚组织改变。使用FHL肌腱移植是有利的,因为它是一个相转移,最大限度地控制神经肌肉。拇长屈肌的解剖位置也创造了最佳的力矢量,从而实现最佳的步态推进。FHL也有一个强健的肌肉腹部,可以随着时间的推移而肥大和加强。作为加速康复的一部分,内镜下入路允许立即负重,这有助于减少肌肉萎缩、深静脉血栓形成和伤口并发症,并有助于早日重返工作岗位3。预期结果:与开放治疗相比,该手术提供了良好的临床结果,并发症发生率降低。在一项对22例慢性跟腱断裂伴大腱间隙的患者进行内窥镜FHL肌腱转移的研究中,美国骨科足踝协会的平均评分从术前的55分提高到最后随访时的91分。该队列中的所有患者都恢复了日常活动。在另一项研究中,共有42例慢性跟腱断裂患者接受了内镜(18例)或开放治疗(24例)。与开放治疗组相比,内镜组患者表现出更好的功能结局和更低的并发症发生率。 接受内窥镜手术的患者术后美国骨科足踝协会评分也显著增加,并发症发生率较低。开放治疗组中有1例患者出现伤口裂开。内镜组无创面愈合并发症。重要提示:使用低流量直接观察内窥镜。使用内窥镜缝合器以避免医源性损伤。在通过肌腱之前,目测骨隧道,以确认骨隧道壁是完整的。当进行肌腱切开术时,足底弯曲踝关节和大脚趾,以便有足够的肌腱长度进行转移。如果存在低水平的FHL肌腹,则可以将其恢复到胫骨距关节的水平。我们发现在距下关节水平切割FHL是转移的最佳选择。距下关节肌腱的不充分的可视化可以阻止肌腱切开术远端转移。避免软组织桥接的方法是尽量减少对后内侧门静脉的利用,并通过环形抓钳沿缝合线向下确认没有软组织桥接。未能同时使用内窥镜和透视可导致隧道放置不充分。缩略语:FHL =幻觉屈肌长hpi =病史spmh =既往病史saids =非甾体类抗炎药spt =物理治疗ysh =社会史type =体格检查mri =磁共振成像cam =控制踝关节运动ofas =美国矫形足踝学会
{"title":"Endoscopic Flexor Hallucis Longus Tendon Transfer for the Treatment of Chronic Achilles Tendon Defects.","authors":"Andrew Rust, Logan Roebke, Kevin D Martin","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00075","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;An all-inside endoscopic flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon transfer is indicated for the treatment of chronic, full-thickness Achilles tendon defects. The aim of this procedure is to restore function of the gastrocnemius-soleus complex while avoiding the wound complications associated with open procedures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Description: &lt;/strong&gt;This procedure can be performed through 2 endoscopic portals, a posteromedial portal (the working portal) and a posterolateral portal (the visualization portal). The FHL tendon is identified, and the joint capsule is debrided to identify the subtalar joint. A shaver is utilized to circumferentially debride the FHL at the level of the subtalar joint, allowing for full visualization of the tendon. Care is taken to avoid the posteromedial neurovascular bundle by keeping the shaver against the tendon. An endoscopic suture-passing device is utilized to pierce the FHL tendon and shuttle a nonabsorbable suture through the tendon; this step is done 2 times. The tendon is then cut at its distal-most aspect (adjacent to the subtalar joint) with an endoscopic cutter. The tendon is then brought through the posteromedial portal and prepared for transosseous passage with nonabsorbable suture. Next, the anterior insertion of the Achilles tendon is endoscopically identified and debrided. With use of needle endoscopy-targeted pin placement, a Beath pin is placed at the anterior footprint of the Achilles via the posteromedial portal. The pin is advanced dorsal to plantar and out the bottom of the foot and is confirmed on fluoroscopy. With use of an appropriately sized reamer, the Beath pin is loaded with the 2 grasping sutures and shuttled plantarly. The needle endoscope is then placed in the posterolateral portal to visualize the FHL tendon, advancing into the tunnel with the foot held in 15° of plantar flexion. An appropriately sized interference screw is then placed in the tunnel, using direct endoscopic visualization to confirm placement and depth of the screw.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Alternatives: &lt;/strong&gt;Chronic Achilles tendon ruptures with symptomatic weakness often necessitate operative treatment; however, high-risk patients may be better managed nonoperatively with an ankle-foot orthosis. These patients often demonstrate improved gait and function with this orthosis&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;. The choice of operative technique for the treatment of chronic Achilles tendon defects is primarily based on tendon gap length; options include end-to-end repair, fascial advancement, and turn-down procedures with or without transferring the FHL, peroneus brevis, or flexor digitorum longus tendons. These techniques require substantial incisions and violation of the posterior compartments and Achilles paratenon, creating substantial postoperative scarring.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rationale: &lt;/strong&gt;Chronic Achilles tendon ruptures with defects or gaps leave the patient with weakness and biomechanical loss of the gastrocnemius-s","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11692965/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Debridement Technique for Single-Stage Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty. 单期翻修肩关节置换术的清创技术。
IF 1 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00093
Logan Kolakowski, Monica Stadecker, Justin Givens, Christian Schmidt, Mark Mighell, Kaitlyn Christmas, Mark Frankle
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of revision shoulder arthroplasty continues to rise, and infection is a common indication for revision surgery. Treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in the shoulder remains a controversial topic, with the literature reporting varying methodologies, including the use of debridement and implant retention, single-stage and 2-stage surgeries, antibiotic spacers, and resection arthroplasty<sup>20</sup>. Single-stage revision has been shown to have a low rate of recurrent infection, making it more favorable because it precludes the morbidity of a 2-stage operation. The present video article describes a meticulous debridement technique as it applies to revision shoulder arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>The previous deltopectoral incision should be utilized, with extension 1 to 1.5 cm proximally and distally, removing any draining sinuses. First, develop subcutaneous flaps above the muscle layer to better establish normal tissue planes. A large medial subcutaneous flap will allow for identification of the superior border of the pectoralis major. The pectoralis can be traced laterally to its humeral insertion, which is often in confluence with the deltoid insertion. Hohmann retractors can be placed sequentially, working distal to proximal, under the deltoid in order to recreate the subdeltoid space. Next, reestablish the subpectoral space by releasing any scar tissue tethering the pectoralis muscle and conjoined tendon. Dislocate the prosthesis and remove modular components. Restore the subcoracoid space by dissecting between the subscapularis and the conjoined tendon, allowing for axillary nerve identification. Complete a full capsular excision circumferentially around the glenoid, taking care to protect the axillary nerve as it passes from the subcoracoid space under the inferior glenoid to the deltoid muscle. The decision to remove well-fixed components should be made by the surgeon. Any exposed osseous surfaces should undergo debridement to reduce bacterial burden. Reimplantation should focus on obtaining stable bone-implant interfaces to minimize any micromotion that may increase risk of reinfection. Our preference is to irrigate with 9 L of normal saline solution, Irrisept (Irrimax), and Bactisure Wound Lavage (Zimmer Biomet). Multiple cultures should be taken and followed carefully postoperatively to allow tailoring of the antibiotic regimen with infectious disease specialists.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Two-stage revision is the most common alternative treatment for shoulder PJI and consists of removal of components, debridement, and delayed component reimplantation; however, it requires at least 1 return to the operating room for definitive treatment.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Serum laboratory studies and joint aspiration are not reliable predictors of shoulder PJI because of the high rate of <i>Cutibacterium acnes</i> infections<sup>21,22</sup>. The inc
背景:翻修肩关节置换术的发生率持续上升,感染是翻修手术的常见指征。肩关节假体周围感染(PJI)的治疗仍然是一个有争议的话题,文献报道了不同的方法,包括使用清创和假体保留、单期和两期手术、抗生素间隔剂和关节置换术切除20。单期翻修已被证明具有较低的复发感染率,使其更有利,因为它排除了两期手术的发病率。本视频文章介绍了一种适用于翻修肩关节置换术的细致清创技术。描述:应利用先前的三角胸肌切口,近端和远端延伸1至1.5 cm,去除任何引流窦。首先,在肌肉层上方发展皮下皮瓣,以更好地建立正常的组织平面。一个大的内侧皮下皮瓣可以识别胸大肌的上缘。胸肌可向外侧延伸至肱止点,常与三角肌止点汇合。Hohmann牵开器可以在三角肌下依次放置,从远端到近端工作,以重建三角肌下空间。接下来,通过释放束缚胸肌和连体肌腱的疤痕组织来重建胸下空间。使假体脱臼并移除模块化部件。通过解剖肩胛下肌和连体肌腱之间来恢复喙下间隙,以便识别腋窝神经。在肩胛盂周围完成一个完整的包膜切除,注意保护腋窝神经因为它从肩胛盂下的喙下间隙到三角肌。移除固定良好的部件应由外科医生决定。任何暴露的骨表面应进行清创以减少细菌负担。再植应侧重于获得稳定的骨-种植体界面,以尽量减少任何可能增加再感染风险的微运动。我们的首选是用9l生理盐水溶液,Irrisept (Irrimax)和Bactisure Wound Lavage (Zimmer Biomet)进行冲洗。术后应进行多次培养并仔细随访,以便与传染病专家一起调整抗生素治疗方案。替代方案:两阶段翻修是肩关节PJI最常见的替代治疗方案,包括取出假体、清创和延迟假体重植;然而,它需要至少1次返回手术室进行最终治疗。理由:由于痤疮表皮杆菌感染率高,血清实验室研究和关节抽吸不是肩部PJI的可靠预测指标21,22。在看似无菌的手术中,意外阳性培养的发生率从11%到52.2%不等[8,23,24]。由于PJI肩关节置换术中意外阳性培养率高,低毒力生物更普遍,因此所有翻修肩关节置换术均应谨慎处理,并进行彻底清创。预期结果:PJI的国际共识会议指南于2018年制定,理论上感染概率评分较高的患者复发率较高19,21。通过细致的清创,一期翻修肩关节置换术后需要再次手术的复发感染率仅为5%,这是所有感染概率评分的平均值19。重要提示:确保有一个适当的切口,以便识别三角肌在锁骨上的起点和肱骨上的插入。胸大肌的上缘可以在外侧追溯到肱骨以正确地识别三角胸肌间隔。当你能够在表面上识别深三角纤维,后方的肩袖肌腱和肱骨时,三角下剥离就完成了。肱骨外展和内旋可改善暴露。肩胛下肌在前方,下肩胛间隙的脂肪组织在下方,肩袖肌腱(或三角下间隙,如果没有袖)在后方和上方,肩胛周围的囊切除是完成的。缩略语:PJI =假体周围关节感染。acnes =痤疮表皮杆菌upc =意外阳性培养is评分=感染概率评分air =清创、抗生素和植入物保留ct =计算机断层扫描wbc =白细胞crp = c反应蛋白esr =红细胞沉降率echg =葡萄糖酸氯己定ac =肩锁骨argt =大结节ysghl =肱骨上韧带。
{"title":"Debridement Technique for Single-Stage Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty.","authors":"Logan Kolakowski, Monica Stadecker, Justin Givens, Christian Schmidt, Mark Mighell, Kaitlyn Christmas, Mark Frankle","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00093","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00093","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;The incidence of revision shoulder arthroplasty continues to rise, and infection is a common indication for revision surgery. Treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in the shoulder remains a controversial topic, with the literature reporting varying methodologies, including the use of debridement and implant retention, single-stage and 2-stage surgeries, antibiotic spacers, and resection arthroplasty&lt;sup&gt;20&lt;/sup&gt;. Single-stage revision has been shown to have a low rate of recurrent infection, making it more favorable because it precludes the morbidity of a 2-stage operation. The present video article describes a meticulous debridement technique as it applies to revision shoulder arthroplasty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Description: &lt;/strong&gt;The previous deltopectoral incision should be utilized, with extension 1 to 1.5 cm proximally and distally, removing any draining sinuses. First, develop subcutaneous flaps above the muscle layer to better establish normal tissue planes. A large medial subcutaneous flap will allow for identification of the superior border of the pectoralis major. The pectoralis can be traced laterally to its humeral insertion, which is often in confluence with the deltoid insertion. Hohmann retractors can be placed sequentially, working distal to proximal, under the deltoid in order to recreate the subdeltoid space. Next, reestablish the subpectoral space by releasing any scar tissue tethering the pectoralis muscle and conjoined tendon. Dislocate the prosthesis and remove modular components. Restore the subcoracoid space by dissecting between the subscapularis and the conjoined tendon, allowing for axillary nerve identification. Complete a full capsular excision circumferentially around the glenoid, taking care to protect the axillary nerve as it passes from the subcoracoid space under the inferior glenoid to the deltoid muscle. The decision to remove well-fixed components should be made by the surgeon. Any exposed osseous surfaces should undergo debridement to reduce bacterial burden. Reimplantation should focus on obtaining stable bone-implant interfaces to minimize any micromotion that may increase risk of reinfection. Our preference is to irrigate with 9 L of normal saline solution, Irrisept (Irrimax), and Bactisure Wound Lavage (Zimmer Biomet). Multiple cultures should be taken and followed carefully postoperatively to allow tailoring of the antibiotic regimen with infectious disease specialists.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Alternatives: &lt;/strong&gt;Two-stage revision is the most common alternative treatment for shoulder PJI and consists of removal of components, debridement, and delayed component reimplantation; however, it requires at least 1 return to the operating room for definitive treatment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rationale: &lt;/strong&gt;Serum laboratory studies and joint aspiration are not reliable predictors of shoulder PJI because of the high rate of &lt;i&gt;Cutibacterium acnes&lt;/i&gt; infections&lt;sup&gt;21,22&lt;/sup&gt;. The inc","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11692968/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic-Assisted Conversion of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty to Total Knee Arthroplasty. 机器人辅助单腔膝关节置换术到全膝关节置换术的转化。
IF 1 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-24 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00004
Nicolas S Piuzzi, Nickelas Huffman, Alex Lancaster, Matthew E Deren
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) procedures have become much more common in the United States in recent years, with >40,000 UKAs performed annually<sup>1</sup>. However, it is estimated that 10% to 40% of UKAs fail and thus require conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA)<sup>2-5</sup>. In the field of total joint arthroplasty, robotic-assisted surgeries have demonstrated advantages such as better accuracy and precision of implant positioning and improved restoration of a neutral mechanical axis<sup>6-9</sup>. These advantages may be useful in UKA to TKA conversion surgeries, as the use of robotic assistance may result in improved bone preservation.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>Robotic-assisted TKA is performed with the patient in the supine position, under spinal anesthesia, and with use of a tourniquet. A limited incision is made approximately 1 cm medial to a standard midline incision, through the previous UKA incision. A medial parapatellar arthrotomy and partial synovectomy are performed. Array pins are placed in a standard fashion: intra-incisional in the femoral diaphysis and extra-incisional in the distal tibial diaphysis. Femoral and tibial bone registration is performed, along with functional knee balancing to adjust implant positioning. The robotic arm-assisted system is then utilized to achieve the planned bone resections. After completing all bone cuts, trial components are inserted. Trial reduction is then performed, and knee extension, stability, and range of motion are assessed. The final implant is cemented into place. We utilize a cruciate-retaining TKA implant. No augments are required.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>An alternative treatment option is manual UKA to TKA conversion.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Robotic-assisted conversion of UKA to TKA is especially useful for patients requiring bone preservation. For example, 1 case series found that the use of robotic-assisted conversion of UKA to TKA resulted in a decreased use of augments and a smaller average polyethylene insert thickness compared with manual conversion. Furthermore, mechanical bone loss may occur secondary to implant loosening. Thus, in patients with aseptic loosening, robotic-assisted conversion of UKA to TKA may be useful<sup>10</sup>.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>Results of robotic-assisted conversion of UKA to TKA have thus far been excellent. In a study of 4 patients undergoing robotic-assisted conversion of UKA to TKA, all patients experienced uneventful recoveries without any need for subsequent re-revision<sup>10</sup>. In a case report of a robotic-assisted conversion of UKA to TKA, the patient was pain-free at both 6 months and 1 year postoperatively, with a range of motion of 0° to 120° at 6 months and 0° to 130° at 1 year, and excellent component alignment on radiographs at 1 year<sup>11</sup>. In another case report, the patient had full range of motion and a normal, pain
背景:近年来,单腔膝关节置换术(UKA)手术在美国变得越来越普遍,每年进行的UKA手术数量达到40万例1。然而,据估计,10%至40%的uka失败,因此需要转换为全膝关节置换术(TKA)2-5。在全关节置换术领域,机器人辅助手术已显示出其优势,如更好的植入物定位的准确性和精度以及改善中性机械轴的恢复-9。这些优点可能在UKA到TKA转换手术中有用,因为机器人辅助的使用可能会改善骨保存。描述:机器人辅助TKA是在病人仰卧位,脊柱麻醉下,使用止血带进行的。通过先前的UKA切口,在标准中线切口内侧约1cm处做一个有限切口。行内侧髌旁关节切开术和部分滑膜切除术。阵列针以标准方式放置:切开内置入股骨干,切开外置入胫骨远端骨干。进行股骨和胫骨配位,同时进行功能性膝关节平衡以调整植入物的位置。然后利用机械臂辅助系统来实现计划的骨切除。完成所有骨切割后,插入试验部件。然后进行试复位,评估膝关节伸展、稳定性和活动范围。最后的植入物被粘合到位。我们使用保留十字架的TKA植入物。不需要增加。备选方案:另一种处理方案是手动UKA到TKA的转换。原理:机器人辅助的UKA到TKA的转换对需要骨保存的患者特别有用。例如,1个案例系列发现,与人工转换相比,使用机器人辅助的UKA到TKA转换导致增加剂的使用减少,平均聚乙烯插入物厚度更小。此外,机械性骨丢失可能继发于种植体松动。因此,对于无菌性松动的患者,机器人辅助的UKA到TKA的转换可能是有用的10。预期结果:到目前为止,机器人辅助的UKA到TKA的转换结果非常好。在一项研究中,4名患者接受了机器人辅助的UKA到TKA的转换,所有患者都经历了平静的恢复,没有任何后续的重新修正10。在一个机器人辅助的UKA向TKA转换的病例报告中,患者在术后6个月和1年无疼痛,6个月时运动范围为0°至120°,1年时运动范围为0°至130°,1年的x线片上部件对齐良好11。在另一个病例报告中,患者术后1年活动范围全,步态正常,无痛。当比较人工和机器人辅助的手术时,1项研究发现,在28例被评估的患者中,术后活动范围和并发症没有差异13。重要提示:在植入物移除和骨切除之前,确保准确的软组织平衡。通过执行初始切割,然后将切除深度移动5或10毫米,可以很容易地切割增材。然后只在需要增加的隔室中进行切割。增强切割通常以循序渐进的方式进行,以避免在其他隔室过度切除,以保存原生骨。在这些病例中,使用具有更强约束和干骺端固定的翻修植入物是很重要的,因为在任何翻修手术中,意外事件可能导致需要选择其他植入物。缩略语:UKA =单室膝关节置换术ra =机器人辅助膝关节置换术dtka =全膝关节置换术rom =活动范围ct =计算机断层扫描ypcl =后交叉韧带dvt =深静脉血栓栓塞术vte =静脉血栓栓塞
{"title":"Robotic-Assisted Conversion of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty to Total Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Nicolas S Piuzzi, Nickelas Huffman, Alex Lancaster, Matthew E Deren","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00004","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00004","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) procedures have become much more common in the United States in recent years, with &gt;40,000 UKAs performed annually&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;. However, it is estimated that 10% to 40% of UKAs fail and thus require conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA)&lt;sup&gt;2-5&lt;/sup&gt;. In the field of total joint arthroplasty, robotic-assisted surgeries have demonstrated advantages such as better accuracy and precision of implant positioning and improved restoration of a neutral mechanical axis&lt;sup&gt;6-9&lt;/sup&gt;. These advantages may be useful in UKA to TKA conversion surgeries, as the use of robotic assistance may result in improved bone preservation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Description: &lt;/strong&gt;Robotic-assisted TKA is performed with the patient in the supine position, under spinal anesthesia, and with use of a tourniquet. A limited incision is made approximately 1 cm medial to a standard midline incision, through the previous UKA incision. A medial parapatellar arthrotomy and partial synovectomy are performed. Array pins are placed in a standard fashion: intra-incisional in the femoral diaphysis and extra-incisional in the distal tibial diaphysis. Femoral and tibial bone registration is performed, along with functional knee balancing to adjust implant positioning. The robotic arm-assisted system is then utilized to achieve the planned bone resections. After completing all bone cuts, trial components are inserted. Trial reduction is then performed, and knee extension, stability, and range of motion are assessed. The final implant is cemented into place. We utilize a cruciate-retaining TKA implant. No augments are required.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Alternatives: &lt;/strong&gt;An alternative treatment option is manual UKA to TKA conversion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rationale: &lt;/strong&gt;Robotic-assisted conversion of UKA to TKA is especially useful for patients requiring bone preservation. For example, 1 case series found that the use of robotic-assisted conversion of UKA to TKA resulted in a decreased use of augments and a smaller average polyethylene insert thickness compared with manual conversion. Furthermore, mechanical bone loss may occur secondary to implant loosening. Thus, in patients with aseptic loosening, robotic-assisted conversion of UKA to TKA may be useful&lt;sup&gt;10&lt;/sup&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Expected outcomes: &lt;/strong&gt;Results of robotic-assisted conversion of UKA to TKA have thus far been excellent. In a study of 4 patients undergoing robotic-assisted conversion of UKA to TKA, all patients experienced uneventful recoveries without any need for subsequent re-revision&lt;sup&gt;10&lt;/sup&gt;. In a case report of a robotic-assisted conversion of UKA to TKA, the patient was pain-free at both 6 months and 1 year postoperatively, with a range of motion of 0° to 120° at 6 months and 0° to 130° at 1 year, and excellent component alignment on radiographs at 1 year&lt;sup&gt;11&lt;/sup&gt;. In another case report, the patient had full range of motion and a normal, pain","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661718/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142886186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Repair of Acute Grade-3 Combined Posterolateral Corner Avulsion Injuries Using a Transosseous Krackow Suture Pull-Through Technique. 经骨Krackow缝合穿过技术修复急性3级合并后外侧角撕脱伤。
IF 1 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-24 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00065
Nancy Park, Hugh Medvecky, Jay Moran, Michael J Medvecky

Background: For complete disruption of the posterolateral corner (PLC) structures, operative treatment is most commonly advocated, as nonoperative treatment has higher rates of persistent lateral laxity and posttraumatic arthritis1-5. Some studies have shown that acute direct repair results in revision rates upwards of 37% to 40% compared with 6% to 9% for initial reconstruction3,6. In a recent study assessing the outcomes of acute repair of PLC avulsion injuries with 2 to 7 years of follow-up, patients with adequate tissue were shown to have a much lower failure rate than previously documented7. In the present video article, we demonstrate a transosseous Krackow pull-through technique for repair of acute avulsion-type PLC multiligamentous knee injuries with no midsubstance injury.

Description: An incision is made along the lateral aspect of the knee from the epicondyle to the fibular shaft. The soft-tissue avulsion injury is identified and tagged with suture. Locking Krackow sutures are placed into the injured structures without separating the soft-tissue sleeve avulsion. With fibular avulsions, fibular and tibial transosseous tunnels are drilled with 2 Beath pins through the fibular head and tibia, exiting through the anteromedial tibial cortex. Lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and anterior biceps sutures are passed through the anterior tunnel, and popliteofibular ligament (PFL) and posterior biceps sutures are passed through the posterior tunnel. A small incision is made over the anteromedial tibial cortex in order to tie the sutures over the same metallic button. In fibular head avulsion fractures, high-strength suture placed through the fibular neck can provide additional compression. For proximal PLC injuries, the iliotibial band is incised at the lateral epicondyle, and the proximal attachment sites of the LCL and popliteus are localized. Krackow locking sutures are placed within the LCL and popliteus tendon. Transosseous tunnels are drilled with Beath pins through the native attachment sites of the LCL and popliteus on the lateral condyle and are directed anteriorly to avoid convergence with a potential anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral tunnel. Sutures are pulled through the femoral attachment sites and tied over the same metallic button.

Alternatives: For acute PLC injuries, nonoperative treatment is not endorsed for the majority of cases. Surgical options include direct repair, repair with augmentation, or reconstruction.

Rationale: The transosseous Krackow pull-through technique allows for an enhanced and secure soft-tissue repair while avoiding suture anchor pull-out from the metaphyseal fibular head bone, which can also be compromised by cortical avulsion fractures. This procedure avoids the cost of an allograft and the donor-site morbidity of an autograft that are associated with a reconstruction. For pat

背景:对于后外侧角(PLC)结构的完全破坏,手术治疗是最常被提倡的,因为非手术治疗具有更高的持续性外侧松弛和创伤后关节炎的发生率1-5。一些研究表明,急性直接修复的修复率高达37%至40%,而初始重建的修复率为6%至9% 3,6。在最近的一项研究中,对PLC撕脱伤的急性修复进行了2 - 7年的随访,结果显示,组织充足的患者的失败率远低于之前的文献7。在这篇视频文章中,我们展示了一种经骨Krackow拉通技术用于修复无中间物质损伤的急性撕脱型PLC多韧带膝关节损伤。描述:沿膝关节外侧从上髁至腓骨干处切开。软组织撕脱伤被识别并用缝线标记。将锁定Krackow缝合线置入受伤结构中,而不分离软组织套筒撕脱。在腓骨撕脱时,用2个Beath销穿过腓骨头和胫骨钻出腓骨和胫骨经骨隧道,穿过胫骨前内侧皮质。外侧副韧带(LCL)和前二头肌缝合线穿过前隧道,腘腓韧带(PFL)和后二头肌缝合线穿过后隧道。在胫骨前内侧皮质上做一个小切口,以便将缝合线绑在同一金属钮扣上。在腓骨头撕脱性骨折中,通过腓骨颈放置高强度缝线可以提供额外的压迫。对于PLC近端损伤,在外侧上髁处切开髂胫束,并定位LCL和腘肌的近端附着部位。Krackow锁定缝合线置于LCL和腘肌肌腱内。经骨隧道用Beath销钉穿过LCL和腘肌在外侧髁上的固有附着点,并指向前方,以避免与潜在的前交叉韧带(ACL)股隧道汇合。将缝合线穿过股骨附着点,绑在同一金属按钮上。替代方案:对于急性PLC损伤,大多数情况下不支持非手术治疗。手术选择包括直接修复、增强修复或重建。原理:经骨Krackow牵引技术可以增强和安全的软组织修复,同时避免从干骺端腓骨头骨拔出缝线锚,这也可能因皮质撕脱骨折而受到损害。这种方法避免了同种异体移植物的成本和自体移植物与重建相关的供体部位发病率。对于中间物质撕裂、慢性损伤和/或组织质量不足的患者,重建或增强更为合适。根据Moran等人的研究,该技术可以导致与初始重建相似的故障率(10.7%),且故障率远低于其他PLC修复技术8。本技术具有相对更可靠的固定方法,因为缝线固定在致密的胫骨皮质骨上,避免了单纯腓骨固定可能出现的缝线锚点移位8。当腓骨脆弱或骨折时,这是有利的。多重锁定Krackow缝合线可进一步防止缝线拔出。预期结果:平均随访2年(范围3至90个月),Moran等人报告的故障率为10.7%,显著低于2016年PLC修复系统综述中报告的38%的故障率8,9。在临床检查中,手术使侧室开口明显减小,从术前的9mm减少到术后的0mm 8。重要提示:对于PLC远端损伤,进行腓神经松解术以识别腓神经并减压。仔细评估撕脱部分近端的软组织,以确定是否存在任何中间物质撕裂。缩写词:PLC =后外侧角lcl =外侧副韧带pfl =腘腓韧带acl =前交叉韧带all =前外侧韧带mri =磁共振成像am =前内侧pcl =后交叉韧带fu =随访=患者报告的结果测量dwb =触地负重。
{"title":"Repair of Acute Grade-3 Combined Posterolateral Corner Avulsion Injuries Using a Transosseous Krackow Suture Pull-Through Technique.","authors":"Nancy Park, Hugh Medvecky, Jay Moran, Michael J Medvecky","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00065","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00065","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For complete disruption of the posterolateral corner (PLC) structures, operative treatment is most commonly advocated, as nonoperative treatment has higher rates of persistent lateral laxity and posttraumatic arthritis<sup>1-5</sup>. Some studies have shown that acute direct repair results in revision rates upwards of 37% to 40% compared with 6% to 9% for initial reconstruction<sup>3,6</sup>. In a recent study assessing the outcomes of acute repair of PLC avulsion injuries with 2 to 7 years of follow-up, patients with adequate tissue were shown to have a much lower failure rate than previously documented<sup>7</sup>. In the present video article, we demonstrate a transosseous Krackow pull-through technique for repair of acute avulsion-type PLC multiligamentous knee injuries with no midsubstance injury.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>An incision is made along the lateral aspect of the knee from the epicondyle to the fibular shaft. The soft-tissue avulsion injury is identified and tagged with suture. Locking Krackow sutures are placed into the injured structures without separating the soft-tissue sleeve avulsion. With fibular avulsions, fibular and tibial transosseous tunnels are drilled with 2 Beath pins through the fibular head and tibia, exiting through the anteromedial tibial cortex. Lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and anterior biceps sutures are passed through the anterior tunnel, and popliteofibular ligament (PFL) and posterior biceps sutures are passed through the posterior tunnel. A small incision is made over the anteromedial tibial cortex in order to tie the sutures over the same metallic button. In fibular head avulsion fractures, high-strength suture placed through the fibular neck can provide additional compression. For proximal PLC injuries, the iliotibial band is incised at the lateral epicondyle, and the proximal attachment sites of the LCL and popliteus are localized. Krackow locking sutures are placed within the LCL and popliteus tendon. Transosseous tunnels are drilled with Beath pins through the native attachment sites of the LCL and popliteus on the lateral condyle and are directed anteriorly to avoid convergence with a potential anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral tunnel. Sutures are pulled through the femoral attachment sites and tied over the same metallic button.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>For acute PLC injuries, nonoperative treatment is not endorsed for the majority of cases. Surgical options include direct repair, repair with augmentation, or reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>The transosseous Krackow pull-through technique allows for an enhanced and secure soft-tissue repair while avoiding suture anchor pull-out from the metaphyseal fibular head bone, which can also be compromised by cortical avulsion fractures. This procedure avoids the cost of an allograft and the donor-site morbidity of an autograft that are associated with a reconstruction. For pat","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661711/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142886185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Temporary Circular External Fixation for Spanning the Traumatized Ankle Joint. 跨越创伤踝关节的临时环形外固定。
IF 1 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-11 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00069
Nando Ferreira, Niel Bruwer, Adriaan Jansen van Rensburg, Ernest Muserere, Shao-Ting Jerry Tsang
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Temporary ankle-spanning circular fixation aims to provide osseous stability while (1) allowing access to and recovery of the traumatized soft-tissue envelope and (2) facilitating safe, comfortable, and clinically relevant cross-sectional imaging for surgical planning. It is most commonly utilized in a "span-scan-plan" treatment strategy in cases of peri-articular fractures around the ankle<sup>2</sup>. Conventional monolateral fixators are prone to morbidity at the half-pin sites in the foot and variation in construct stability. Temporary ankle-spanning circular external fixation of the traumatized ankle joint can mitigate these issues.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>A circular external fixator construct is assembled beginning with a single tibial ring that is fixed to the tibia by half-pins that are spread on either side of the ring and forming a "virtual ring block." A foot ring is attached via 2 crossed tensioned fine wires in the calcaneum and a single midfoot fine wire in order to prevent an equinus deformity. The tibial virtual ring block and the foot ring are interconnected by 3 polyaxial "rapid-adjust struts" that are evenly distributed around the limb. The fracture is then reduced, and the polyaxial rapid-adjust struts are locked<sup>1</sup>.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Numerous constructs have been proposed to optimally immobilize the ankle joint while also allowing limb elevation and access to the ankle for soft-tissue care<sup>3-6</sup>. A commonly utilized construct is the monolateral "bar-and-clamp" spanning external fixator, which relies on half-pin fixation in the foot that may induce bone lysis, result in pin-site infections, and prevent weight-bearing. Calcaneal half-pins are particularly troublesome and can lead to adjacent lysis, instability, and potential loss of initial reduction as a result of the cancellous bone quality.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>The principal objective of temporary joint-spanning external fixation is to realign the traumatized joint and to maintain this reduction until definitive surgery while facilitating soft-tissue treatment and surgical planning<sup>7-11</sup>. This strategy forms the first step in the "span-scan-plan" approach to pilon fractures described by Sirkin et al.<sup>2</sup>. Multiple subsequent studies have confirmed the superiority of external fixation over splinting for initial soft-tissue care following distal tibial and ankle trauma<sup>12,13</sup>.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>Temporary circular external fixation has been shown to outperform monolateral fixation in terms of both the adequacy of the initial reduction and the maintenance of this reduction<sup>1</sup>. Harrison et al. demonstrated that temporary circular fixation of the traumatized ankle yielded 100% good or excellent initial reduction compared with 91% for monolateral fixation. This initial reduction was also better maintained by circular fixator constru
背景:临时跨越踝关节的环形固定旨在提供骨稳定性,同时(1)允许进入和恢复创伤的软组织包膜,(2)促进安全、舒适和临床相关的手术计划横断面成像。在踝关节周围骨折的病例中,它最常用于“跨扫描计划”治疗策略。传统的单侧固定器容易在足部半针位置发病,并且结构稳定性发生变化。创伤踝关节的临时跨踝环形外固定可以缓解这些问题。描述:一个圆形的外固定架结构由一个胫骨环开始组装,该胫骨环通过分布在环两侧的半销固定在胫骨上,形成一个“虚拟环块”。脚环通过跟骨中的2根交叉张力细线和一根足中部细线连接,以防止马蹄畸形。胫骨虚拟环块和足环通过均匀分布在肢体周围的3个多轴“快速调节支柱”相互连接。然后将裂缝复位,并锁定多轴快速调节支柱1。备选方案:已经提出了许多结构来最佳地固定踝关节,同时也允许肢体抬高和进入踝关节进行软组织护理3-6。一种常用的结构是单侧“棒夹”跨式外固定架,它依赖于足部半针固定,可能导致骨溶解,导致针位感染,并妨碍负重。跟骨半钉特别麻烦,由于松质骨质量的原因,可能导致相邻的松解、不稳定和潜在的初始复位损失。理由:临时跨关节外固定的主要目的是重新调整受伤的关节,并保持这种复位直到最终手术,同时促进软组织治疗和手术计划7-11。该策略是Sirkin等人描述的“跨扫描计划”方法的第一步2。随后的多项研究证实,在胫骨远端和踝关节创伤后的初始软组织护理中,外固定架优于夹板12,13。预期结果:在初始复位的充分性和复位的维持方面,临时圆形外固定已被证明优于单侧内固定1。Harrison等人证明,创伤踝关节的临时圆形固定可获得100%良好或极好的初始复位,而单侧固定的初始复位率为91%。与单侧固定架相比,圆形固定架结构也能更好地维持这种初始复位(96%对78%)。重要提示:环的位置和方向应考虑到损伤区域,矫形手术的通道,以及可调节支柱的最大长度。正交框架的应用为胫骨关节骨折和/或脱位的稳定提供了最佳的生物力学环境,以促进软组织护理。在手术室中应注意确保近端和远端环与各自的骨段正交安装。避免跟骨内横置细丝,防止框内移位;考虑使用张紧的橄榄丝,以进一步防止翻译。将足中线穿过跖骨底部或沿楔形骨放置以最大限度地固定。注意避免踝关节或前脚呈马蹄形。首字母缩写:CEF =圆形外固定器pad =旋前内收per =旋前外旋sad =旋后内收ser =旋后外旋
{"title":"Temporary Circular External Fixation for Spanning the Traumatized Ankle Joint.","authors":"Nando Ferreira, Niel Bruwer, Adriaan Jansen van Rensburg, Ernest Muserere, Shao-Ting Jerry Tsang","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00069","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00069","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Temporary ankle-spanning circular fixation aims to provide osseous stability while (1) allowing access to and recovery of the traumatized soft-tissue envelope and (2) facilitating safe, comfortable, and clinically relevant cross-sectional imaging for surgical planning. It is most commonly utilized in a \"span-scan-plan\" treatment strategy in cases of peri-articular fractures around the ankle&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;. Conventional monolateral fixators are prone to morbidity at the half-pin sites in the foot and variation in construct stability. Temporary ankle-spanning circular external fixation of the traumatized ankle joint can mitigate these issues.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Description: &lt;/strong&gt;A circular external fixator construct is assembled beginning with a single tibial ring that is fixed to the tibia by half-pins that are spread on either side of the ring and forming a \"virtual ring block.\" A foot ring is attached via 2 crossed tensioned fine wires in the calcaneum and a single midfoot fine wire in order to prevent an equinus deformity. The tibial virtual ring block and the foot ring are interconnected by 3 polyaxial \"rapid-adjust struts\" that are evenly distributed around the limb. The fracture is then reduced, and the polyaxial rapid-adjust struts are locked&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Alternatives: &lt;/strong&gt;Numerous constructs have been proposed to optimally immobilize the ankle joint while also allowing limb elevation and access to the ankle for soft-tissue care&lt;sup&gt;3-6&lt;/sup&gt;. A commonly utilized construct is the monolateral \"bar-and-clamp\" spanning external fixator, which relies on half-pin fixation in the foot that may induce bone lysis, result in pin-site infections, and prevent weight-bearing. Calcaneal half-pins are particularly troublesome and can lead to adjacent lysis, instability, and potential loss of initial reduction as a result of the cancellous bone quality.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rationale: &lt;/strong&gt;The principal objective of temporary joint-spanning external fixation is to realign the traumatized joint and to maintain this reduction until definitive surgery while facilitating soft-tissue treatment and surgical planning&lt;sup&gt;7-11&lt;/sup&gt;. This strategy forms the first step in the \"span-scan-plan\" approach to pilon fractures described by Sirkin et al.&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;. Multiple subsequent studies have confirmed the superiority of external fixation over splinting for initial soft-tissue care following distal tibial and ankle trauma&lt;sup&gt;12,13&lt;/sup&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Expected outcomes: &lt;/strong&gt;Temporary circular external fixation has been shown to outperform monolateral fixation in terms of both the adequacy of the initial reduction and the maintenance of this reduction&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;. Harrison et al. demonstrated that temporary circular fixation of the traumatized ankle yielded 100% good or excellent initial reduction compared with 91% for monolateral fixation. This initial reduction was also better maintained by circular fixator constru","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11623823/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142814388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic-Assisted Decompression, Decortication, and Instrumentation for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. 微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中机器人辅助减压、去皮和内固定。
IF 1 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-06 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00080
Franziska C S Altorfer, Fedan Avrumova, Darren R Lebl
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic-assisted spine surgery has been reported to improve the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement and to reduce blood loss, hospital length of stay, and early postoperative pain<sup>1</sup>. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) is a procedure that is well suited to be improved by recent innovations in robotic-assisted spine surgery. Heretofore, the capability of robotic navigation and software in spine surgery has been limited to assistance with pedicle screw insertion. Surgical decompression and decortication of osseous anatomy in preparation for biological fusion had historically been outside the scope of robotic-assisted spine surgery. In 2009, early attempts to perform surgical decompressions in a porcine model utilizing the da Vinci Surgical Robot for laminotomy and laminectomy were limited by the available technology<sup>2</sup>. Recent advances in software and instrumentation allow registration, surgical planning, and robotic-assisted surgery on the posterior elements of the spine. A human cadaveric study assessed the accuracy of robotic-assisted bone laminectomy, revealing precision in the cutting plane<sup>3</sup>. Robotic-assisted facet decortication, decompression, interbody cage implantation, and pedicle screw fixation add automation and accuracy to MI-TLIF.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>A surgical robotic system comprises an operating room table-mounted surgical arm with 6 degrees of freedom that is physically connected to the patient's osseous anatomy with either a percutaneous Steinmann pin to the pelvis or a spinous process clamp. The Mazor X Stealth Edition Spine Robotic System (Version 5.1; Medtronic) is utilized, and a preoperative plan is created with use of software for screw placement, facet decortication, and decompression. The workstation is equipped with interface software designed to streamline the surgical process according to preoperative planning, intraoperative image acquisition, registration, and real-time control over robotic motion. The combination of these parameters enables the precise execution of preplanned facet joint decortication, osseous decompression, and screw trajectories. Consequently, this technique grants the surgeon guidance for the drilling and insertion of screws, as well as guidance for robotic resection of bone with a bone-removal drill.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>The exploration of robotically guided facet joint decortication and decompression in MI-TLIF presents an innovative alternative to the existing surgical approaches, which involve manual bone removal and can be less precise. Other robotic systems commonly utilized in spine surgery include the ROSA (Zimmer Biomet), the ExcelsiusGPS (Globus Medical), and the Cirq (Brainlab)<sup>4</sup>.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>The present video article provides a comprehensive guide for executing robotic-assisted MI-TLIF, including robotic facet decortica
背景:据报道,机器人辅助脊柱手术可提高椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性和安全性,减少失血量、住院时间和术后早期疼痛1。微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(mi - tliff)是一种非常适合通过机器人辅助脊柱手术的最新创新来改进的手术。迄今为止,机器人导航和软件在脊柱外科手术中的能力仅限于协助椎弓根螺钉置入。为生物融合做准备的骨解剖减压和去皮手术历来不在机器人辅助脊柱手术的范围之内。2009年,利用达芬奇手术机器人对猪模型进行椎板切开术和椎板切除术的早期尝试受到现有技术的限制2。软件和仪器的最新进展允许对脊柱后部进行登记、手术计划和机器人辅助手术。一项人体尸体研究评估了机器人辅助椎板切除术的准确性,揭示了切割平面的准确性。机器人辅助的关节突去皮、减压、椎间笼植入和椎弓根螺钉固定增加了MI-TLIF的自动化和准确性。描述:一种手术机器人系统包括一个手术台上安装的具有6个自由度的手术臂,该手术臂通过经皮Steinmann针插入骨盆或棘突夹与患者的骨骼解剖结构物理连接。Mazor X隐形版脊柱机器人系统(版本5.1;使用美敦力(Medtronic),并使用软件制定术前计划,进行螺钉置入、关节突去皮和减压。该工作站配备了接口软件,旨在根据术前计划、术中图像采集、配准和机器人运动的实时控制来简化手术过程。这些参数的组合可以精确地执行预先计划的小关节脱屑、骨减压和螺钉轨迹。因此,该技术可以指导外科医生钻孔和插入螺钉,也可以指导机器人用去骨钻切除骨头。替代方案:在MI-TLIF中探索机器人引导的小关节去骨和减压为现有的手术方法提供了一种创新的替代方案,这些方法涉及人工剔骨并且可能不太精确。脊柱外科中常用的其他机器人系统包括ROSA (Zimmer Biomet)、ExcelsiusGPS (Globus Medical)和Cirq (Brainlab)。理由:本视频文章提供了执行机器人辅助MI-TLIF的综合指南,包括机器人小关节面去皮和骨减压。先进的机器人技术的引入,既能减压骨,又能提供植入物指导,这代表了机器人辅助脊柱手术的一大进步。机器人辅助的融合面去皮、手术减压、椎间笼置入和椎弓根螺钉置入的软件规划允许微创和更精确的MI-TLIF。预期结果:预期结果包括腰部和腿部疼痛减轻,功能状态改善,脊柱融合术成功。x线检查结果显示椎间孔高度恢复,骨融合牢固。此外,通过扩大脊柱融合手术中的机器人功能,可以提高手术精度,降低入路相关的发病率,并从手动骨移除转向精确的机械化技术。机器人辅助小关节脱屑减压技术的引入是脊柱外科的一个重要里程碑,它提高了患者护理水平,促进了技术进步。重要提示:虽然机器人系统最初主要用于胸椎或腰椎椎弓根螺钉置入,但最近机器人技术和软件的进步已经允许对后路元件进行登记。这一进步扩大了机器人系统在脊柱减压和小关节面去皮质的应用,增强了融合过程。在该手术过程中,保持解剖精度和防止需要重新定位是关键考虑因素。建议遵循一致的手术流程:小关节突去皮、减压、模块螺钉置入、椎间盘切除术、置入椎体间保持器、置入复位卡、插入椎棒和固定螺钉锁定。在MI-TLIF中纳入机器人辅助并不能免除一系列挑战。 这些问题包括安装过程的可靠性、注册失败的发生、后勤复杂性、时间限制以及与机器人骨骼和小关节减压新能力相关的独特学习曲线。缩略语:MI-TLIF=微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术or =手术室psis =髂后上棘ect =计算机断层扫描ap =正位。
{"title":"Robotic-Assisted Decompression, Decortication, and Instrumentation for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.","authors":"Franziska C S Altorfer, Fedan Avrumova, Darren R Lebl","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00080","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00080","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Robotic-assisted spine surgery has been reported to improve the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement and to reduce blood loss, hospital length of stay, and early postoperative pain&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) is a procedure that is well suited to be improved by recent innovations in robotic-assisted spine surgery. Heretofore, the capability of robotic navigation and software in spine surgery has been limited to assistance with pedicle screw insertion. Surgical decompression and decortication of osseous anatomy in preparation for biological fusion had historically been outside the scope of robotic-assisted spine surgery. In 2009, early attempts to perform surgical decompressions in a porcine model utilizing the da Vinci Surgical Robot for laminotomy and laminectomy were limited by the available technology&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;. Recent advances in software and instrumentation allow registration, surgical planning, and robotic-assisted surgery on the posterior elements of the spine. A human cadaveric study assessed the accuracy of robotic-assisted bone laminectomy, revealing precision in the cutting plane&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;. Robotic-assisted facet decortication, decompression, interbody cage implantation, and pedicle screw fixation add automation and accuracy to MI-TLIF.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Description: &lt;/strong&gt;A surgical robotic system comprises an operating room table-mounted surgical arm with 6 degrees of freedom that is physically connected to the patient's osseous anatomy with either a percutaneous Steinmann pin to the pelvis or a spinous process clamp. The Mazor X Stealth Edition Spine Robotic System (Version 5.1; Medtronic) is utilized, and a preoperative plan is created with use of software for screw placement, facet decortication, and decompression. The workstation is equipped with interface software designed to streamline the surgical process according to preoperative planning, intraoperative image acquisition, registration, and real-time control over robotic motion. The combination of these parameters enables the precise execution of preplanned facet joint decortication, osseous decompression, and screw trajectories. Consequently, this technique grants the surgeon guidance for the drilling and insertion of screws, as well as guidance for robotic resection of bone with a bone-removal drill.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Alternatives: &lt;/strong&gt;The exploration of robotically guided facet joint decortication and decompression in MI-TLIF presents an innovative alternative to the existing surgical approaches, which involve manual bone removal and can be less precise. Other robotic systems commonly utilized in spine surgery include the ROSA (Zimmer Biomet), the ExcelsiusGPS (Globus Medical), and the Cirq (Brainlab)&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rationale: &lt;/strong&gt;The present video article provides a comprehensive guide for executing robotic-assisted MI-TLIF, including robotic facet decortica","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617349/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142802747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Far Posterior Approach for Rib Fracture Fixation: Surgical Technique and Tips. 远后路入路治疗肋骨骨折:手术技术和技巧。
IF 1 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-06 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00094
Taylor J Manes, Daniel T DeGenova, Benjamin C Taylor, Jignesh N Patel
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present video article describes the far posterior or paraspinal approach to posterior rib fractures. This approach is utilized to optimize visualization intraoperatively in cases of far-posterior rib fractures. This technique is also muscle-sparing, and muscle-sparing posterolateral, axillary, and anterior approaches have been shown to return up to 95% of periscapular strength by 6 months postoperatively<sup>1</sup>.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>Like most fractures, the skin incision depends on the fracture position. The vertical incision is made either just medial to a line equidistant between the palpable spinous processes and medial scapular border or directly centered over the fracture line in this region. The incision and superficial dissection must be extended cranially and caudally, approximately 1 or 2 rib levels past the planned levels of instrumentation, in order to allow muscle elevation and soft-tissue retraction. Superficial dissection reveals the trapezius muscle, with its fibers coursing from inferomedial to superolateral caudal to the scapular spine, and generally coursing transversely above this level. The trapezius is split in line with its fibers (or elevated proximally at the caudal-most surface), and the underlying layer will depend on the location of the incision. The rhomboid minor muscle overlies ribs 1 and 2, the rhomboid major muscle overlies ribs 3 to 7, and the latissimus dorsi overlies the remaining rib levels. To avoid muscle transection, the underlying muscle is also split in line with its fibers. Next, the thoracolumbar fascia is encountered and sharply incised, revealing the erector spinae muscles, which comprise the spinalis thoracis, longissimus thoracis, and iliocostalis thoracis muscles. These muscles and their tendons must be sharply elevated from lateral to midline; electrocautery is useful for this because there is a robust blood supply in this region. Medially, while retracting the paraspinal musculature, visualization with this approach can extend to the head and neck of the rib, and even to the spine. Following deep dissection, the fractures are now visualized. During fracture reduction, it is critical to assess reduction of both the costovertebral joint and the costotransverse joint. With fractures closer to the spine, it is recommended to have at least 2 cm between the rib head and tubercle in order to allow 2 plate holes to be positioned on the neck of the rib; if comminution exists and plating onto the transverse process is needed, several screws are required here for stability as well. For appropriate stability if plating onto the spine is not required, a minimum of 3 locking screws on each side of the fracture are recommended. Contouring of the plates to match the curvature of the rib and to allow for proper apposition may be required with posterior rib fractures. Screws must be placed perpendicular to the rib surface. Following operative stabilization of
背景:本视频文章描述了远后路或棘旁入路治疗后肋骨骨折。这种方法用于优化术中远后肋骨骨折的可视化。该技术也是肌肉保留技术,并且在术后6个月,后外侧、腋窝和前路的肌肉保留可恢复高达95%的肩胛骨周围力量1。描述:像大多数骨折一样,皮肤切口取决于骨折位置。垂直切口在可触及棘突和肩胛骨内侧边界等距离的中间或直接在该区域的骨折线的中心。切口和浅表剥离必须在颅侧和尾侧延伸,大约超过计划内固定水平1或2个肋骨水平,以便允许肌肉提升和软组织内收。浅层解剖显示斜方肌,其纤维从内侧到上外侧到肩胛骨尾侧,通常在此水平以上横向走行。斜方肌与其纤维沿直线分开(或在最尾端近端升高),其下层取决于切口的位置。小菱形肌覆盖在第1和第2肋骨上,大菱形肌覆盖在第3到第7肋骨上,背阔肌覆盖在其余肋骨上。为了避免肌肉横断,下面的肌肉也按照其纤维分开。接下来,与胸腰筋膜接触并切开,显露出竖脊肌,它包括胸棘肌、胸最长肌和髂肋肌。这些肌肉和它们的肌腱必须从外侧急剧上升到中线;电灼术在这方面很有用,因为这一区域有充足的血液供应。在内侧,当收缩棘旁肌肉组织时,这种入路的显像可以延伸到肋骨的头部和颈部,甚至脊柱。深度剥离后,可见骨折。在骨折复位过程中,评估肋椎关节和肋横关节的复位情况是至关重要的。如果骨折离脊柱更近,建议肋骨头与结节之间至少有2厘米的距离,以便在肋骨颈部放置2个钢板孔;如果存在粉碎并且需要在横向过程上电镀,这里也需要几个螺钉以保持稳定性。如果不需要将钢板固定在脊柱上,为了保持适当的稳定性,建议骨折的每侧至少安装3枚锁定螺钉。后肋骨骨折可能需要钢板的轮廓与肋骨的曲率相匹配,并允许适当的相对位置。螺钉必须垂直于肋面放置。手术稳定肋骨骨折后,进行分层闭合,并应用软敷料。替代方案:非手术替代方案包括非阿片类药物和阿片类药物以及用于控制疼痛的皮质类固醇注射。支持性机械通气和物理治疗呼吸练习也可根据需要实施。手术选择包括利用传统的锁定钢板和螺钉进行切开复位和内固定。理由:由于周围软组织的支持,肋骨骨折在没有移位的情况下通常采用非手术治疗2,3。根据胸壁损伤学会指南,肋骨骨折手术固定的禁忌症包括需要持续复苏的患者;涉及第1、2、11或12肋骨的肋骨骨折属于相对禁忌症;重型颅脑外伤;以及急性心肌梗塞。患者年龄4岁。在某些情况下,包括有严重移位、持续呼吸窘迫、疼痛或骨折不愈合的患者,采用切开复位和内固定进行稳定可能是合适的5-7。对于连枷胸损伤的病例,通常需要手术治疗。文献中指出,连枷胸伤的发生率约为每10万人中有150例,死亡率高达33%8,9。肋骨骨折的手术治疗已被证明与重大创伤患者住院时间的缩短和死亡率的降低有关。预期结果:该手术的预期结果包括并发症发生率低,住院和重症监护病房住院时间缩短,机械通气时间缩短10,11。然而,与任何手术一样,也存在风险,包括医源性肺损伤,包括长螺钉或主动脉或下腔静脉损伤,以及侵略性操作移位的骨折碎片,特别是身体左侧。在切开复位时,也有损伤神经血管束的风险。田中等人。 与非手术组(90%)相比,手术组术后肺炎发生率显著降低(22%)12。Schuette等人的研究表明,手术组术后肺炎发生率为23%,1年死亡率为0%,在重症监护病房平均住院6.2天,平均总住院时间为17.3天,平均总呼吸机使用时间为4天10。Prins等人报道,手术患者的肺炎发病率(24%)明显低于非手术患者(47.3%;P = 0.033),而且30天死亡率显著降低(0%对17.7%;P = 0.018)。该手术采用了保留肌肉的技术,在使用后外侧、腋窝和前路入路的文献中已经证明了成功的结果,与未受伤的肩部相比,术后6个月可恢复高达95%的肩胛骨周围力量1。在远后路入路中使用肌肉保留技术是一个需要进一步研究的课题,以便将结果与先前使用其他入路所显示的成功结果进行比较。重要提示:同侧肢体可以准备入野,以便术中操作,以实现肩胛胸运动和改善肩胛下通路。对于肋椎骨折脱位,垂直切口位于可触及棘突和肩胛骨内侧边界之间等距离的中间线。侧卧位可用于同时进入更外侧延伸的骨折,并保证后外侧入路;然而,这种入路通常难以进入脊柱附近的骨折部位。这种肌肉保留技术被推荐用于优化术后肩胛骨周围力量,正如之前在其他入路中所证明的那样。切口和浅表剥离必须在颅侧和尾侧延伸大约1或2个肋骨水平,超过计划的内固定水平,以便允许肌肉提升和软组织内收。为避免手术剥离时的肌肉横断,将下层肌肉与其纤维按直线切开。在深度解剖时,很难描绘出下面的肌肉,因为这些肌肉的纤维并不与斜方肌在一条直线上,有些肌肉,如大菱形肌,几乎垂直于斜方肌。在抬高竖脊肌和肌腱时,电刺激是有用的,因为该区域有充足的血液供应。竖脊肌复合体相对紧密并粘附于肋骨下方,这可能使其难以获得充分的可视化;因此,必须将至少3根肋骨水平升高,才能进入肋骨进行复位和内固定。虽然内旋畸形在该区域更为常见,但骨折的任何外移位都可能导致可用于进入的肌肉损伤。在骨折复位过程中,评估肋椎关节和肋横关节的复位情况是至关重要的。必须特别注意植入物的轮廓,因为目前没有任何商业上可用于该区域的预轮廓植入物,并且目前任何可用的植入物在脊柱上的电镀仍然是一种超说明书使用。对于更具挑战性的断裂模式,建议使用直角电钻和螺丝刀。一般来说,如前所述,如果需要,切口可以提供远至内侧至横突的通路。然而,如果这种方法不能很好地观察到肋骨骨折脱位的后肋或脊柱,可以在脊柱外科医生的配合下使用脊柱中线切口。对于靠近脊柱的骨折,建议在肋骨头部和结节之间至少有2厘米的距离,以便在肋骨颈部放置2个钢板孔。如果存在粉碎并且需要在横向过程上电镀,则需要几个螺钉以保持稳定性。当测量要放置在横突的螺钉长度时,可以利用术前CT扫描。缩略语:CT =计算机断层扫描cwis =胸壁损伤学会ivc =下腔静脉
{"title":"Far Posterior Approach for Rib Fracture Fixation: Surgical Technique and Tips.","authors":"Taylor J Manes, Daniel T DeGenova, Benjamin C Taylor, Jignesh N Patel","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00094","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00094","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;The present video article describes the far posterior or paraspinal approach to posterior rib fractures. This approach is utilized to optimize visualization intraoperatively in cases of far-posterior rib fractures. This technique is also muscle-sparing, and muscle-sparing posterolateral, axillary, and anterior approaches have been shown to return up to 95% of periscapular strength by 6 months postoperatively&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Description: &lt;/strong&gt;Like most fractures, the skin incision depends on the fracture position. The vertical incision is made either just medial to a line equidistant between the palpable spinous processes and medial scapular border or directly centered over the fracture line in this region. The incision and superficial dissection must be extended cranially and caudally, approximately 1 or 2 rib levels past the planned levels of instrumentation, in order to allow muscle elevation and soft-tissue retraction. Superficial dissection reveals the trapezius muscle, with its fibers coursing from inferomedial to superolateral caudal to the scapular spine, and generally coursing transversely above this level. The trapezius is split in line with its fibers (or elevated proximally at the caudal-most surface), and the underlying layer will depend on the location of the incision. The rhomboid minor muscle overlies ribs 1 and 2, the rhomboid major muscle overlies ribs 3 to 7, and the latissimus dorsi overlies the remaining rib levels. To avoid muscle transection, the underlying muscle is also split in line with its fibers. Next, the thoracolumbar fascia is encountered and sharply incised, revealing the erector spinae muscles, which comprise the spinalis thoracis, longissimus thoracis, and iliocostalis thoracis muscles. These muscles and their tendons must be sharply elevated from lateral to midline; electrocautery is useful for this because there is a robust blood supply in this region. Medially, while retracting the paraspinal musculature, visualization with this approach can extend to the head and neck of the rib, and even to the spine. Following deep dissection, the fractures are now visualized. During fracture reduction, it is critical to assess reduction of both the costovertebral joint and the costotransverse joint. With fractures closer to the spine, it is recommended to have at least 2 cm between the rib head and tubercle in order to allow 2 plate holes to be positioned on the neck of the rib; if comminution exists and plating onto the transverse process is needed, several screws are required here for stability as well. For appropriate stability if plating onto the spine is not required, a minimum of 3 locking screws on each side of the fracture are recommended. Contouring of the plates to match the curvature of the rib and to allow for proper apposition may be required with posterior rib fractures. Screws must be placed perpendicular to the rib surface. Following operative stabilization of ","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617350/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142802746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Acetabular Labrum Using an Autograft Hip Capsule. 关节镜下应用自体髋关节囊重建髋臼唇。
IF 1 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-06 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00068
Bilal S Siddiq, Stephen M Gillinov, Nathan J Cherian, Scott D Martin

Background: Whereas uncomplicated labral tears with preserved fibers can be effectively treated with use of labral repair techniques, complex tears and hypoplastic labra require labral reconstruction1-3. Standard reconstruction techniques feature grafted tissue that is added to existing, deficient tissue or that is utilized to replace a hypoplastic labrum entirely4-9. However, such approaches utilizing allografts or remote autografts are limited because they often necessitate extensive debridement of the existing labrum to prepare a site for graft implantation, an approach that can damage and devascularize the chondrolabral junction10-14. The presently described technique, arthroscopic capsular autograft labral reconstruction, is suitable for simple tears as well as hypoplastic, degenerative, and complex tears, and negates the challenges of utilizing allografts or remote autografts by supplementing the labrum. In addition, this technique avoids substantial resection, thus preserving the chondrolabral junction15-22.

Description: Following induction of anesthesia and appropriate patient positioning, puncture capsulotomy is performed to enter the hip joint26. In the presence of a sufficiently intact labrum, 3 to 5 mm of capsule is elevated to augment the labrum and preserve the blood supply. In the presence of a severely deficient or hypoplastic labrum, the capsule is elevated 5 to 10 mm to reconstruct the labrum. Following capsular augmentation and potential acetabuloplasty, 2.3-mm bioabsorbable composite anchors are utilized to secure the elevated capsular tissue and the remaining labral tissue to the acetabular rim. Loop suture or a vertical mattress suture technique is then utilized to complete the repair. A Weston knot and several half-hitches are placed while dynamically tensioning along the capsular aspect of the repair in order to secure the labral reconstruction to the acetabular rim with concurrent release of traction. Anchors are placed roughly 1 cm apart to prevent strangulation of the capsular vessels29.

Alternatives: Labral reconstruction options include autografts or allografts7. Potential allografts include the semitendinosus, tibialis anterior, iliotibial band, tensor fasciae latae, and peroneus brevis8-14. Remote autograft sites include the gracilis and quadriceps tendons16,17. These options are limited by increased donor site morbidity and operative time to obtain the grafts. Local autograft sites include the ligamentum teres, indirect head of the rectus femoris, iliotibial band, and hip capsule15,18-23,25.

Rationale: Relative to autografts, the allografts most commonly utilized in labral reconstruction feature a heightened risk of disease transmission, increased cost, and a potentially lengthened time to graft incorporation15. Among the local autograft sites, the uti

背景:使用唇瓣修复技术可以有效地治疗具有保留纤维的简单的唇瓣撕裂,而复杂的撕裂和发育不全的唇瓣则需要唇瓣重建1-3。标准重建技术的特点是将移植组织添加到现有的缺陷组织中,或用于完全替代发育不全的阴唇4-9。然而,这种采用同种异体移植物或远程自体移植物的方法是有限的,因为它们通常需要对现有的唇瓣进行广泛的清创,以准备移植物植入的位置,这种方法可能会损害和破坏软骨关节连接处10-14。目前所描述的关节镜下自体关节囊移植唇瓣重建技术,适用于单纯性撕裂以及发育不全、退行性和复杂的撕裂,并且通过补充唇瓣消除了利用同种异体移植物或远程自体移植物的挑战。此外,该技术避免了大量切除,从而保留了关节关节15-22。描述:在诱导麻醉和适当的患者体位后,进行穿刺囊切开进入髋关节26。在唇部足够完整的情况下,抬高3 - 5mm的囊以增强唇部并保持血液供应。如果存在严重缺陷或发育不全的阴唇,则将囊抬高5 - 10mm以重建阴唇。在囊体增大和潜在的髋臼成形术后,使用2.3毫米生物可吸收复合锚将升高的囊体组织和剩余的唇部组织固定在髋臼边缘。然后利用环状缝合或垂直床垫缝合技术来完成修复。在沿着修复体的囊面动态拉伸时放置Weston结和几个半结,以确保唇部重建与髋臼缘的安全,同时释放牵引力。锚大约间隔1厘米放置,以防止荚膜血管绞窄29。替代方法:下唇重建包括自体移植物或同种异体移植物7。潜在的同种异体移植物包括半腱肌、胫骨前肌、髂胫束、阔筋膜张肌和腓骨短肌8-14。远程自体移植物部位包括股薄肌和股四头肌肌腱16,17。这些选择受到供体部位发病率增加和获得移植物的手术时间的限制。局部自体移植物部位包括圆韧带、股直肌间接头、髂胫束和髋关节囊15,18-23,25。理由:与自体移植物相比,最常用于唇部重建的同种异体移植物具有更高的疾病传播风险、更高的成本和可能延长的移植物整合时间15。在局部自体移植物中,圆韧带移植物的应用受到限制,因为它的采集需要开放的方法21,22。自体股直肌移植物重建吸口密封的能力缺乏经验支持19,20。髂胫束除了需要额外的切口外,在收获部位有已知的软组织并发症10,18。自体髋关节囊移植不受这些限制25。目前描述的技术改进了现有的远程和局部自体移植物采集技术,通过使用具有完整血液供应的移植物来支持唇部并加强其密封。鉴于可以进行不同程度的囊膜增强,该技术可以以某种形式用于所有程度的髋臼唇修复。预期结果:在术后3、6、12和24个月,无法通过简单修复治疗的复杂唇裂患者,通过髋关节囊囊增强的唇瓣重建在功能结局上比基线有显著改善。此外,在术后24个月,76.3%、65.5%和60.8%的患者国际髋关节预后工具-33 (iHOT-33)评分分别超过了最小临床重要差异、患者可接受症状状态和实际临床获益的阈值30。重要提示:对于较大的凸轮病变,在术前计划期间进行3D计算机断层扫描。门静脉前外侧应在透视下放置,并使用关节内液体扩张技术,以尽量减少医源性损伤关节唇和/或关节软骨的风险。囊组织的数量被提升是由唇部损伤的程度决定的。当提升囊组织时,需要小心翼翼地保护囊和唇的血液供应。最后的缝合固定是在没有牵引的情况下进行的,这确保了圆内修复和恢复唇唇吸引密封。间歇性牵引可将神经麻痹的风险降至最低。 无需牵引进行准备和悬垂、骨髓抽吸、缝线固定或股骨颈成形术。最小牵引应用于囊膜抬高、髋臼成形术、锚钉放置和缝线张紧。我们的方法采用了穿刺囊切开术,在之前对163例患者的研究中显示,该方法无常见关节成形术并发症的风险,如微不稳定和囊膜折叠的翻修26,31。在唇状骨和软骨关节严重缺失的翻修病例中,可能需要使用远端自体移植物或同种异体移植物重建唇状骨。请注意,这个过程有一个陡峭的学习曲线,需要细致的技术。首字母缩写:FAI =股髋臼撞击tb =髂胫束tfl =阔筋膜张量elt =韧带松弛hot -33 =国际髋关节预后工具-33 mcid =最小临床重要差异epass =患者可接受症状状态cb =显著临床获益ct =计算机断层扫描ap =正位mri =磁共振成像asis =髂前上棘bmac =骨髓抽取集中vt =深静脉血栓形成
{"title":"Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Acetabular Labrum Using an Autograft Hip Capsule.","authors":"Bilal S Siddiq, Stephen M Gillinov, Nathan J Cherian, Scott D Martin","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00068","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00068","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whereas uncomplicated labral tears with preserved fibers can be effectively treated with use of labral repair techniques, complex tears and hypoplastic labra require labral reconstruction<sup>1-3</sup>. Standard reconstruction techniques feature grafted tissue that is added to existing, deficient tissue or that is utilized to replace a hypoplastic labrum entirely<sup>4-9</sup>. However, such approaches utilizing allografts or remote autografts are limited because they often necessitate extensive debridement of the existing labrum to prepare a site for graft implantation, an approach that can damage and devascularize the chondrolabral junction<sup>10-14</sup>. The presently described technique, arthroscopic capsular autograft labral reconstruction, is suitable for simple tears as well as hypoplastic, degenerative, and complex tears, and negates the challenges of utilizing allografts or remote autografts by supplementing the labrum. In addition, this technique avoids substantial resection, thus preserving the chondrolabral junction<sup>15-22</sup>.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>Following induction of anesthesia and appropriate patient positioning, puncture capsulotomy is performed to enter the hip joint<sup>26</sup>. In the presence of a sufficiently intact labrum, 3 to 5 mm of capsule is elevated to augment the labrum and preserve the blood supply. In the presence of a severely deficient or hypoplastic labrum, the capsule is elevated 5 to 10 mm to reconstruct the labrum. Following capsular augmentation and potential acetabuloplasty, 2.3-mm bioabsorbable composite anchors are utilized to secure the elevated capsular tissue and the remaining labral tissue to the acetabular rim. Loop suture or a vertical mattress suture technique is then utilized to complete the repair. A Weston knot and several half-hitches are placed while dynamically tensioning along the capsular aspect of the repair in order to secure the labral reconstruction to the acetabular rim with concurrent release of traction. Anchors are placed roughly 1 cm apart to prevent strangulation of the capsular vessels<sup>29</sup>.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Labral reconstruction options include autografts or allografts7. Potential allografts include the semitendinosus, tibialis anterior, iliotibial band, tensor fasciae latae, and peroneus brevis8-14. Remote autograft sites include the gracilis and quadriceps tendons16,17. These options are limited by increased donor site morbidity and operative time to obtain the grafts. Local autograft sites include the ligamentum teres, indirect head of the rectus femoris, iliotibial band, and hip capsule15,18-23,25.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Relative to autografts, the allografts most commonly utilized in labral reconstruction feature a heightened risk of disease transmission, increased cost, and a potentially lengthened time to graft incorporation<sup>15</sup>. Among the local autograft sites, the uti","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617351/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142802745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Percutaneous Screw Fixation of Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures. 第五跖骨近端骨折的经皮螺钉固定术
IF 1 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-15 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00078
Cuyler P Dewar, Gabe N O'Hara, Logan J Roebke, John McKeon, Kevin D Martin

Metatarsal fractures are one of the most common injuries of the foot, accounting for approximately 5% to 6% of all fractures confronted in the outpatient setting1. Approximately 45% to 70% of these fractures involve the fifth metatarsal, which have been described using a 3 zonal approach in 1993 by Lawrence and Botte2. Zone 2 fractures are difficult to manage given their retrograde vascular supply, leading to higher rates of nonunion1,3. Jones fractures (zone 2) are primarily treated surgically, with the 2 main methods being intramedullary screw fixation and plate fixation3. Surgical management leads to higher rates of union when compared with nonoperative modalities. Presented here is a technique for zone 2 intra-articular Jones fractures with minimal to moderate displacement via open reduction and internal fixation. This technique is not recommended for comminuted fractures or those with proximal split fractures. Starting with the foot lateral, this technique requires meticulous marking of the anatomical landmarks of the distal fibula as well as the fifth metatarsal to establish the precise starting point for the guidewire. Using a mini c-arm, a high and inside positioning should be confirmed prior to advancing the guidewire from proximal to distal while remaining positioned in the center of the medullary canal. Capitalizing on the variable pitch of a 5.0-mm headless compression screw, the Jones fracture is compressed to ensure primary bone healing. The incision is then closed, and a soft wrap is utilized followed by 2 weeks of non-weight-bearing and progressive protective weight-bearing until a complete recovery is achieved.

Background: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for the operative treatment of zone-2 intra-articular Jones fractures with minimal to moderate displacement is recommended because of the high rate of nonunion associated with nonoperative treatment. The blood supply to this region is minimal because of its retrograde flow, leading to high rates of nonunion with nonoperative treatment. The presently described technique offers reduction and fixation of a zone-2 fracture, as well as improved functional outcomes and nonunion rates. This approach is minimally invasive, as it is performed percutaneously, leading to a decrease in soft-tissue damage, infection rates, and operative time.

Description: The zone-2 fifth metatarsal ORIF technique begins with the use of a marking pen to outline the distal fibula and the head of the fifth metatarsal for proper orientation. Fluoroscopy is utilized to identify the landmarks so that a guidewire can be placed into the proximal dorsal aspect of the fifth metatarsal. Placement is confirmed on multiple radiographic images. The guidewire is then slowly inserted down the medullary canal of the fifth metatarsal, with placement verified on multiple fluoroscopic images. Once placement is confirmed,

跖骨骨折是足部最常见的损伤之一,约占门诊患者骨折总数的5%至6%1。这些骨折中约有 45% 至 70% 涉及第五跖骨,1993 年 Lawrence 和 Botte 采用三区法对其进行了描述2。第 2 区骨折因其逆行血管供应而难以处理,导致骨折不愈合率较高1,3。琼斯骨折(第2区)主要采用手术治疗,两种主要方法是髓内螺钉固定和钢板固定3。与非手术治疗方式相比,手术治疗的愈合率更高。这里介绍的是一种通过切开复位和内固定治疗轻度至中度移位的第2区关节内琼斯骨折的技术。对于粉碎性骨折或近端劈裂性骨折,不建议采用此技术。该技术从足部外侧开始,需要仔细标记腓骨远端和第五跖骨的解剖标志,以确定导丝的精确起点。使用微型 C 臂,在将导丝从近端推进到远端之前,应先确认高位和内侧定位,同时保持在髓管的中心位置。利用 5.0 毫米无头加压螺钉的可变螺距,对琼斯骨折进行加压,以确保原发性骨愈合。然后缝合切口,使用软包裹,2 周内不负重,逐渐保护性负重,直至完全康复:背景:由于非手术治疗的不愈合率较高,因此建议采用开放复位内固定术(ORIF)对具有轻度至中度移位的 2 区关节内琼斯骨折进行手术治疗。由于逆行血流,该区域的血液供应极少,导致非手术治疗的不愈合率很高。目前所描述的技术可对 2 区骨折进行复位和固定,并改善功能性结果和非愈合率。这种方法是微创的,因为它是经皮进行的,从而减少了软组织损伤、感染率和手术时间:2区第五跖骨ORIF技术首先使用记号笔勾勒出腓骨远端和第五跖骨头的轮廓,以便正确定位。利用透视来确定地标,以便将导丝放入第五跖骨的近端背侧。通过多张放射图像确认放置位置。然后将导丝沿着第五跖骨髓管缓慢插入,并在多张透视图像上确认位置。确认位置后,通过射线测量估算螺钉尺寸。钝性切开并向下剖开,切口向内侧偏高,以保护硬神经和腓肠肌肌腱插入。然后使用套管螺钉系统钻孔。从生物力学角度来看,最好使用全芯螺钉,根据椎管直径的不同,螺钉直径在 4.5 毫米到 5.5 毫米之间。在视频中的示例手术中,插入了一枚 5 毫米的全芯螺钉,直到透视下观察到骨折明显缩小,并在多次放射影像检查中得到确认。对置入位置满意后,移除导丝,冲洗置入部位并用 3-0 尼龙线缝合。然后在切口周围注射基于重量的短效和长效局麻药(罗哌卡因和利多卡因),作为术后多模式止痛疗法的一部分。然后清洗并擦干切口区域。然后敷上 Xeroform、4×4s、陆军战斗敷料和软包裹,再穿上术后靴:手术效果不佳的患者包括患有神经性足病、局部感染、严重血管功能不全以及合并症导致手术危险的患者。这类患者可以接受非手术治疗,包括在石膏中进行 4 到 6 周的非负重治疗,直到通过影像学检查确认骨结合。一旦骨结合得到确认,患者还需穿靴子负重 4 到 6 周。一项荟萃分析发现,非手术治疗导致的不愈合率在15%至30%之间,明显高于手术治疗(0%至11%)6。大多数 2 区第五跖骨骨折病例都采用手术治疗,髓内螺钉或钢板固定是主要技术。髓内螺钉固定是本视频中介绍的技术,由于采用经皮方法,因此具有减少软组织损伤、感染和手术时间的优势。
{"title":"Percutaneous Screw Fixation of Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures.","authors":"Cuyler P Dewar, Gabe N O'Hara, Logan J Roebke, John McKeon, Kevin D Martin","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00078","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00078","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Metatarsal fractures are one of the most common injuries of the foot, accounting for approximately 5% to 6% of all fractures confronted in the outpatient setting<sup>1</sup>. Approximately 45% to 70% of these fractures involve the fifth metatarsal, which have been described using a 3 zonal approach in 1993 by Lawrence and Botte<sup>2</sup>. Zone 2 fractures are difficult to manage given their retrograde vascular supply, leading to higher rates of nonunion<sup>1,3</sup>. Jones fractures (zone 2) are primarily treated surgically, with the 2 main methods being intramedullary screw fixation and plate fixation<sup>3</sup>. Surgical management leads to higher rates of union when compared with nonoperative modalities. Presented here is a technique for zone 2 intra-articular Jones fractures with minimal to moderate displacement via open reduction and internal fixation. This technique is not recommended for comminuted fractures or those with proximal split fractures. Starting with the foot lateral, this technique requires meticulous marking of the anatomical landmarks of the distal fibula as well as the fifth metatarsal to establish the precise starting point for the guidewire. Using a mini c-arm, a high and inside positioning should be confirmed prior to advancing the guidewire from proximal to distal while remaining positioned in the center of the medullary canal. Capitalizing on the variable pitch of a 5.0-mm headless compression screw, the Jones fracture is compressed to ensure primary bone healing. The incision is then closed, and a soft wrap is utilized followed by 2 weeks of non-weight-bearing and progressive protective weight-bearing until a complete recovery is achieved.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for the operative treatment of zone-2 intra-articular Jones fractures with minimal to moderate displacement is recommended because of the high rate of nonunion associated with nonoperative treatment. The blood supply to this region is minimal because of its retrograde flow, leading to high rates of nonunion with nonoperative treatment. The presently described technique offers reduction and fixation of a zone-2 fracture, as well as improved functional outcomes and nonunion rates. This approach is minimally invasive, as it is performed percutaneously, leading to a decrease in soft-tissue damage, infection rates, and operative time.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>The zone-2 fifth metatarsal ORIF technique begins with the use of a marking pen to outline the distal fibula and the head of the fifth metatarsal for proper orientation. Fluoroscopy is utilized to identify the landmarks so that a guidewire can be placed into the proximal dorsal aspect of the fifth metatarsal. Placement is confirmed on multiple radiographic images. The guidewire is then slowly inserted down the medullary canal of the fifth metatarsal, with placement verified on multiple fluoroscopic images. Once placement is confirmed, ","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567698/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142649258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Closed Intramedullary Pinning of Displaced Radial Neck Fracture (Metaizeau Technique). 桡骨颈移位骨折的闭合髓内针固定(Metaizeau 技术)。
IF 1 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-13 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00076
Scott H Kozin, Francisco Soldado
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radial neck fractures account for 1% of all pediatric fractures and 5% to 10% of pediatric elbow fractures. The mechanism of injury is typically a fall with the elbow in hyperextension and the forearm in supination. A valgus force compresses the radial head against the capitellum, causing a radial neck fracture. Displaced radial neck fractures are difficult to treat and account for a disproportionate number of bad outcomes, including malunion, nonunion, and osteonecrosis. The preferred treatment is closed reduction and fixation, as open reduction is associated with an inordinately high rate of osteonecrosis. Closed intramedullary pinning is an effective technique to achieve and maintain reduction. The procedure relies on an intact periosteum and requires attention to detail. The present video article will demonstrate the technique of closed intramedullary pinning (the Metaizeau technique). Metaizeau et al. previously described their technique of closed reduction and intramedullary pinning of radial neck fractures. A Kirschner wire is inserted retrograde from the distal radius into the posterolateral radial neck with the forearm pronated to avoid injury to the posterior interosseous nerve. Reduction is achieved by rotating the wire 180°. This technique relies on intact periosteum, with care taken to preserve the tenuous blood supply of the radial head and to achieve adequate reduction.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>General anesthesia is administered, and the patient is positioned supine with use of an arm table or with an image intensifier utilized as an arm table. A tourniquet is applied to the operative limb. Fluoroscopy is utilized to identify the distal radius physis. A radial approach is performed to access the distal radius, proximal to the growth plate, with care taken to protect the sensory nerves. The cortex of the radial metaphysis is opened with use of a drill bit or a bone awl to allow space for the internal fixation device. Opening in a proximal direction and into the medullary canal facilitates intramedullary passage. A Steinmann pin (1.2 to 2.5 mm), Ilizarov wire (2.0 mm), or elastic nail can be utilized for as an intramedullary device. Place the pre-bent Steinmann pin/Ilizarov wire/elastic nail into the metaphysis and advance it in a proximal direction toward the radial neck fracture. The tip of the intramedullary device is directed into the displaced radial neck fracture, engaging the radial epiphysis. The pin/wire/elastic nail is rotated 180° to reduce the fracture, and reduction is confirmed on radiographs. Once reduction and fixation are confirmed, the pin/wire/elastic nail is cut and the skin is closed over it with use of absorbable sutures. A long arm cast is applied for 4 to 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Alternatives include cast immobilization for cases of displaced fractures with <20° of angulation, closed reduction by placing the elbow in varus with direct pressure on
背景:桡骨颈骨折占所有小儿骨折的1%,占小儿肘部骨折的5%至10%。受伤机制通常是在肘部过伸、前臂上举的情况下摔倒。外翻力将桡骨头压迫在髌骨上,造成桡骨颈骨折。移位性桡骨颈骨折很难治疗,造成的不良后果也很严重,包括骨折愈合不良、骨折不愈合和骨坏死。首选的治疗方法是闭合复位和固定,因为开放复位与过高的骨坏死发生率有关。闭合性髓内钉固定是实现和维持复位的有效技术。该手术依赖于完整的骨膜,需要注意细节。本视频文章将演示闭合性髓内钉技术(Metaizeau 技术)。Metaizeau 等人曾介绍过他们的桡骨颈骨折闭合复位和髓内钉技术。在前臂外展的情况下,从桡骨远端逆行将 Kirschner 钢丝插入桡骨颈后外侧,以避免损伤后骨间神经。通过将钢丝旋转 180° 实现缩窄。该技术依赖于完整的骨膜,并注意保护桡骨头的微弱血供,以实现充分的缩小:对患者进行全身麻醉,让患者仰卧,使用臂桌或将图像增强器用作臂桌。对手术肢体施加止血带。利用透视检查确定桡骨远端骨膜。采用桡骨切口进入桡骨远端,接近生长板,同时注意保护感觉神经。使用钻头或骨锥打开桡骨干骺端的皮质,为内固定装置留出空间。向近端方向打开并进入髓质管有利于髓内通过。可使用 Steinmann 针(1.2 至 2.5 毫米)、Ilizarov 线(2.0 毫米)或弹性钉作为髓内装置。将预先弯曲的 Steinmann 针/Ilizarov 钢丝/弹性钉放入干骺端,并向桡骨颈骨折近端方向推进。将髓内装置的尖端插入移位的桡骨颈骨折处,与桡骨干骺端接合。将髓内针/钢丝/弹性钉旋转 180°,使骨折复位,并在 X 光片上确认复位情况。一旦确认骨折复位和固定,就剪断针/线/弹力钉,使用可吸收缝线缝合皮肤。长臂石膏固定 4 到 6 周:替代方案:对于有移位骨折的病例,可采用石膏固定:逆行髓内复位固定术可实现骨折复位、提供稳定性并避免切开复位:在一项评估使用 Metaizeau 技术治疗移位桡骨颈骨折后肘关节功能的研究中,Ghonim 等人报告称,根据梅奥肘关节功能评分,22.2% 的患者疗效极佳,77.8% 的患者疗效良好。影像学结果与之相似。与其他类似研究的结果相比,该结果略差,这可能是因为纳入的桡骨颈骨折的严重程度不同。Klitscher 等人评估了 28 例采用 Metaizeau 技术治疗的桡骨颈骨折病例。根据梅奥肘关节表现评分,23 例(82%)取得了极佳效果,5 例(18%)取得了良好效果。平均得分为 97 分,报告有 3 例畸形。Metaizeau 等人报告了他们的技术在 42 例桡骨颈骨折中的应用,其中 31 例骨折的成角在 30° 至 80° 之间(第 1 组),16 例骨折的成角大于 80°(第 2 组)。Yallapragada 和 Maripuri 对 21 名平均年龄为 8 岁的患者使用 Metaizeau 技术进行了评估。拔甲后 6 周,19 名患者(90.5%)效果极佳或良好,2 名患者(9.5%)效果一般。Zimmerman 等人对 151 名接受手术治疗的桡骨颈骨折患儿进行了回顾性分析。在131名得到充分随访的患者中,31%的效果不佳。疗效不佳与年龄大于 10 岁、骨折严重程度增加以及接受切开复位术的患者有关。作者总结说,应尽可能在切开复位前尝试创伤较小的复位方法:重要提示:避开桡骨远端生长板。使用T型手柄固定钢丝。有必要使用透视来帮助放置钢丝,并确认充分的复位和骨折固定。
{"title":"Closed Intramedullary Pinning of Displaced Radial Neck Fracture (Metaizeau Technique).","authors":"Scott H Kozin, Francisco Soldado","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00076","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00076","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Radial neck fractures account for 1% of all pediatric fractures and 5% to 10% of pediatric elbow fractures. The mechanism of injury is typically a fall with the elbow in hyperextension and the forearm in supination. A valgus force compresses the radial head against the capitellum, causing a radial neck fracture. Displaced radial neck fractures are difficult to treat and account for a disproportionate number of bad outcomes, including malunion, nonunion, and osteonecrosis. The preferred treatment is closed reduction and fixation, as open reduction is associated with an inordinately high rate of osteonecrosis. Closed intramedullary pinning is an effective technique to achieve and maintain reduction. The procedure relies on an intact periosteum and requires attention to detail. The present video article will demonstrate the technique of closed intramedullary pinning (the Metaizeau technique). Metaizeau et al. previously described their technique of closed reduction and intramedullary pinning of radial neck fractures. A Kirschner wire is inserted retrograde from the distal radius into the posterolateral radial neck with the forearm pronated to avoid injury to the posterior interosseous nerve. Reduction is achieved by rotating the wire 180°. This technique relies on intact periosteum, with care taken to preserve the tenuous blood supply of the radial head and to achieve adequate reduction.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Description: &lt;/strong&gt;General anesthesia is administered, and the patient is positioned supine with use of an arm table or with an image intensifier utilized as an arm table. A tourniquet is applied to the operative limb. Fluoroscopy is utilized to identify the distal radius physis. A radial approach is performed to access the distal radius, proximal to the growth plate, with care taken to protect the sensory nerves. The cortex of the radial metaphysis is opened with use of a drill bit or a bone awl to allow space for the internal fixation device. Opening in a proximal direction and into the medullary canal facilitates intramedullary passage. A Steinmann pin (1.2 to 2.5 mm), Ilizarov wire (2.0 mm), or elastic nail can be utilized for as an intramedullary device. Place the pre-bent Steinmann pin/Ilizarov wire/elastic nail into the metaphysis and advance it in a proximal direction toward the radial neck fracture. The tip of the intramedullary device is directed into the displaced radial neck fracture, engaging the radial epiphysis. The pin/wire/elastic nail is rotated 180° to reduce the fracture, and reduction is confirmed on radiographs. Once reduction and fixation are confirmed, the pin/wire/elastic nail is cut and the skin is closed over it with use of absorbable sutures. A long arm cast is applied for 4 to 6 weeks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Alternatives: &lt;/strong&gt;Alternatives include cast immobilization for cases of displaced fractures with &lt;20° of angulation, closed reduction by placing the elbow in varus with direct pressure on ","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554352/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142630257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1