JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques最新文献

Background: Metallic lateralized-offset glenoid reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for cuff tear arthropathy combines the use of a metallic augmented baseplate with a metaphyseally oriented short stem design that can be applied at a 135° or 145° neck-shaft angle, leading to additional lateralization on the humeral side. Lateralization of the center of rotation decreases the risk of inferior scapular notching and improves external rotation, deltoid wrapping, residual rotator cuff tensioning, and prosthetic stability^1-4. Metallic increased-offset RSA (MIO-RSA) achieves lateralization and corrects inclination and retroversion while avoiding graft resorption and other complications of bony increased-offset RSA (BIO-RSA)^5-8. Reducing the neck-shaft angle from the classical Grammont design, in combination with glenoid lateralization, improves range of motion^9,10 by reducing inferior impingement during adduction at the expense of earlier superior impingement during abduction^2,11. Lädermann et al.¹² investigated how different combinations of humeral stem and glenosphere designs influence range of motion and muscle elongation. They assessed 30 combinations of humeral components, as compared with the native shoulder, and found that the combination that allows for restoration of >50% of the native range of motion in all directions was a 145° onlay stem with a concentric or lateralized tray in conjunction with a lateralized or inferior eccentric glenosphere. In addition, the use of a flush-lay or a slight-onlay stem design (like the one utilized in the presently described technique) may decrease the risk of secondary scapular spine fracture^13,14. The goal of this prosthetic design is to achieve an excellent combination of motion and stability while reducing complications.

Description: This procedure is performed via a deltopectoral approach with the patient in the beach-chair position under general anesthesia combined with a regional interscalene nerve block. Subscapularis tenotomy and capsular release are performed, the humeral head is dislocated, and any osteophytes are removed. An intramedullary cutting guide is placed for correct humeral resection. The osteotomy of the humeral head is performed in the anatomical neck with an inclination of 135° and a retroversion of 20° to 40°, depending on the anatomical retroversion. The glenoid is prepared as usual. The lateralized, augmented baseplate is assembled with the central screw and the baseplate-wedge-screw complex is placed by inserting the screw into the central screw hole. Four peripheral screws are utilized for definitive fixation. An eccentric glenosphere with inferior overhang is implanted. The humerus is dislocated, and the metaphysis is prepared. Long compactors are utilized for proper stem alignment, and an asymmetric trial insert is positioned before the humerus is reduced. Stability and ra

Background: A number of techniques have been described to enter the capsule and gain access to the hip joint during hip arthroscopy^1,2. Among these, the interportal and T-capsulotomies are the most commonly utilized; however, these approaches transect the iliofemoral ligament, which normally resists anterior subluxation and stabilizes extension³. Thus, these approaches may introduce capsuloligamentous instability^1,4-7 and have been associated with complications such as dislocation, postoperative pain, microinstability, seroma, and heterotopic ossification^5,8-12. Although prior literature has demonstrated durable mid-term results for patients undergoing capsulotomies with capsular closure^6,13, avoidance of iatrogenic injury to the hip capsule altogether is preferable. Thus, the puncture capsulotomy technique we present is minimally invasive, preserves the biomechanics of the hip joint and capsule without disrupting the iliofemoral ligament, and allows for appropriate visualization of the joint through placement of multiple small portals.

Description: Following induction of anesthesia and with the patient supine on a hip traction table, the nonoperative leg is positioned at 45° abduction with support of a well-padded perineal post, and the operative hip is placed into valgus against the post¹⁴. Intra-articular fluid distention with normal saline solution is utilized to achieve approximately 9 mm of inferior migration of the femoral head and decrease risk of iatrogenic nerve injury¹⁵. Then, under fluoroscopic guidance, an anterolateral portal is created 1 cm anterior and 1 cm superior to the greater trochanter at an approximately 15° to 20° angle. Second, via arthroscopic visualization, the anterior portal is created 1 cm distal and 1 cm lateral to the intersection of a vertical line drawn at the anterior superior iliac spine and a horizontal line at the level of the anterolateral portal. Third, equidistant between the anterior and anterolateral portals, the mid-anterior portal is created distally. Finally, at one-third of the distance between the anterior superior iliac spine and the anterolateral portal, the Dienst portal is created. Thus, these 4 portals form a quadrilateral arrangement through which puncture capsulotomy can be performed⁵.

Alternatives: Alternative approaches to the hip capsule include interportal and T-capsulotomies, with or without capsular closure^1,2,4,6,7,16. Although the most frequently utilized, these approaches transect the iliofemoral ligament and thus may introduce capsuloligamentous instability^1,4-7,17.

Rationale: The puncture capsulotomy technique has the advantage of maintaining the integrity of the capsule through the placement of 4 small portals. The technique does not transect the iliofemoral ligament and thus does not

Background: Dual plating of the distal femur is indicated for the treatment of complex intra-articular fractures, supracondylar femoral fractures, low periprosthetic fractures, and nonunions. The aim of this procedure is anatomical alignment of the articular surface, restoration of the articular block, and prevention of varus collapse.

Description: Following preoperative planning, the patient is positioned supine with the knee flexed at 30°. The lateral incision is made first, with a mid-lateral incision that is in line with the femoral shaft. If intra-articular work is needed this incision can be extended by curving anteriorly over the lateral femoral condyle. Next, the iliotibial band is transected in line with its fibers. The vastus lateralis fascia is incised and elevated off the septum, working distal to proximal. Care should be taken to maintain hemostasis when encountering femoral artery perforating vessels. Once there is adequate exposure, several reduction aids can be utilized, including a bump under the knee, Schanz pins, Kirschner wires, and reduction clamps. A lateral precontoured plate is placed submuscularly, and the most proximal holes are filled percutaneously. The medial incision begins distally at the adductor tubercle and is a straight incision made proximally in line with the femoral shaft. The underlying fascia is transected in line with the skin incision, and the vastus medialis is elevated. Care should be taken to avoid the descending geniculate artery, as well as its articular branch and the muscular branch to the vastus medialis. A lateral tibial plateau plate is contoured and placed.

Alternatives: Nonoperative treatment of distal femoral fractures is rare, but relative indications for nonoperative treatment include frailty of the patient, lack of ambulatory status, a non-reconstructible fracture, or a stable fracture. These patients are placed in a long-leg cast followed by a hinged knee brace¹. There are several other surgical fixation options, including lateral plating, retrograde intramedullary nailing, distal femoral replacement, and augmentation of a retrograde nail with a plate.

Rationale: Dual plating has several benefits, depending on the clinical scenario. Biomechanical studies have found that dual plating results in increased stiffness and construct strength^2,3. Additional construct stability can be offered through the use of locking plates, particularly in osteoporotic bone. Taken together, this increased stability and construct strength can allow for earlier weight-bearing, which is particularly important for fractures in the geriatric population. Furthermore, the increased stiffness and construct strength make this procedure a favorable treatment option for nonunion, and it has been shown to result in lower rates of postoperative nonunion compared with lateral plating alone^4-7. Adjunctive

Background: Vancomycin is a prophylactic antibiotic with bactericidal activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus that is commonly used in total joint replacement surgery¹. In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), intraosseous infusions administered following tourniquet inflation have demonstrated improved local vancomycin concentrations with decreased systemic absorption^1-3. This administration method results in no adverse reactions locally, as well as equivalent or lower systemic complications compared with other vancomycin administration methods⁴. Intraosseous infusion of prophylactic surgical antibiotics has been shown to be more effective than intravenous administration, with the potential for reduction in surgical site infections⁵.

Description: After the operative extremity has been prepared and draped in the usual sterile fashion, the limb is elevated and the tourniquet is inflated to 250 mm Hg. Prior to incision, an intraosseous vascular access system (Arrow EZ IO; Teleflex) is inserted with a power driver into the tibial tubercle region. The desired volume of the medication is injected into the tibia. The device is removed and then inserted into the anterior distal femur, centrally, just proximal to the patella. Following this, the desired volume of the medication is injected into the femur. The device is then removed, and the TKA proceeds according to the surgeon's standard technique.

Alternatives: Alternative administration methods for vancomycin include other invasive methods and noninvasive delivery. Intravenous delivery is the most traditional form of medication delivery^1,2. Additional alternatives include noninvasive placement of antibiotic powder into the wound and localized soft-tissue injections of desired medications^1-3.

Rationale: Opting to administer antibiotics and other medications intraosseously (rather than intravenously) has shown improved compliance with the golden-hour rule of preoperative antibiotics (especially for vancomycin)⁴, lower incidences of acute kidney injury or adverse systemic effects⁴, and improved local tissue concentrations of all medications delivered^1-3.

Expected outcomes: Expected outcomes include improved local tissue concentrations with decreased systemic concentrations of vancomycin and with no reported local or systemic adverse reactions, as well as the potential for improved infection prevention^1-5. Literature regarding the use of intraosseous infusion during TKA has been thorough and very well received. A prospective, randomized study by Young et al. evaluated local and systemic concentrations of vancomycin following intraosseous versus intravenous administration. The authors found that low-dose intraosseous vancomycin resulted in tissue concentrations equal t

Background: This video article describes the technique for arthroscopic reduction and fixation of Pipkin type-I fractures.

Description: Surgery is performed with the patient in a supine position, with free lower limbs, on a radiolucent table. Arthroscopic superior and anterolateral portals are made similarly to the portals created to evaluate the peripheral compartment during an outside-in (ballooning) technique.¹ An additional medial portal is subsequently created in order to aid in reduction and screw placement. The medial portal is created in abduction and external rotation of the hip (i.e., the figure-4 position). The adductor tendon is identified, and the portal is then safely positioned posteriorly to its margin, approximately 4 to 5 cm distal to the inguinal fold, avoiding the saphenous vein (usually identified with an ultrasound scan). The fragment is mobilized, debrided, and then reduced with use of a microfracture awl or a large Kirschner wire (used as a joystick). Following reduction, temporary fixation is performed with use of long Kirschner wires under direct visualization and fluoroscopic guidance. If reduction is satisfactory, definitive fixation can be performed with use of 4.5-mm headless screws through the medial portal. All steps of fragment reduction and fixation are performed through the medial portal, with the patient in the figure-4 position. Once the screws are placed, a final dynamic arthroscopic and fluoroscopic check is performed.

Alternatives: In Pipkin type-I fractures, surgery is recommended when the femoral head fragment is large (exceeding 15% to 20% of the femoral head volume) and displaced (by >3 mm). In such cases, if untreated, spontaneous evolution to osteoarthritis may occur. For fragments smaller than 10% to 15% of the femoral head volume, arthroscopic removal is often the best choice². Several approaches (e.g., Smith-Petersen, modified Hueter, Kocher-Langenbeck, and surgical safe dislocation) have been proposed for reduction and fixation, with surgical safe dislocation being the most versatile because of the uniquely complete visualization of the femoral head³.

Rationale: The arthroscopic reduction and fixation technique for a non-comminuted Pipkin type-I fracture holds the intrinsic advantages of being less invasive than open surgery in terms of surgical exposure, and having less blood loss, infection risks, and wound complications. Arthroscopy allows direct visualization of the fragment and its reduction surface, along with removal of articular loose bodies and debridement. The surgical time is influenced by the surgeon's experience, but often is no longer than with an open procedure. In the few studies assessing the use of this technique, the rates of osteonecrosis and heterotopic ossification are lower than with open techniques. It is worth noting that the studies assessing the use o

Background: For patients with transfemoral amputations and difficulty tolerating conventional socket-based prostheses, osseointegrated (OI) implants have enabled increased prosthetic use, improved patient satisfaction, and shown promising functional outcomes^1,2. Although the use of OI implants effectively eliminates the soft-tissue-related challenges that have plagued socket-based prostheses, the presence of a permanent, percutaneous implant imparts a host of new soft-tissue challenges that have yet to be fully defined. In patients undergoing OI surgery who have redundant soft tissue, we perform a thighplasty to globally reduce excess skin and fat, tighten the soft-tissue envelope, and improve the contour of the residual limb.

Description: First, the orthopaedic surgical team prepares the residual femur for implantation of the OI device. After the implant is inserted, the residual hamstrings and quadriceps musculature are closed over the end of the femur, and the subcutaneous tissue and skin are closed in a layered fashion. Although the anatomic location and amount of excess soft tissue are patient-dependent, we perform a standard pinch test to determine the amount of soft tissue that can be safely removed for the thighplasty. Once the proposed area of resection is marked, we proceed with longitudinal, sharp dissection down to the level of the muscular fascia. At this point, we use another pinch test to confirm the amount of soft-tissue resection that will allow for adequate resection without undue tension³. Excess subcutaneous fat and skin are carefully removed along the previously marked incisions, typically overlying the medial compartment of the thigh in the setting of patients with transfemoral amputations. The thighplasty incision is closed in a layered fashion over 1 or 2 Jackson-Pratt drains, depending on the amount of resection.

Alternatives: Depending on the amount of redundant soft tissue, thighplasty may not be necessary at the time of OI surgery; however, in our experience, excess soft tissue surrounding the transcutaneous aperture can predispose the patient to increased shear forces at the aperture, increased drainage, and increased risk of infection⁴.

Rationale: Although superficial infectious complications are most common following OI surgery, the need for soft-tissue refashioning and excision is one of the most common reasons for reoperation^1,5. Our group has been more aggressive than most in our use of a vertical thighplasty procedure to globally reduce soft-tissue motion in the residual limb to avoid reoperation.

Expected outcomes: Although much of the OI literature has focused on infectious complications, recent studies have demonstrated reoperation rates of 18% to 36% for redundant soft tissue following OI surgery^1,5. We believe that thighplasty at the time of O

Background: Transcutaneous osseointegration for amputees (TOFA) has proven to consistently, significantly improve the quality of life and mobility for the vast majority of amputees, as compared with the use of a socket prosthesis^1,2. As with any implant, situations such as infection, aseptic loosening, or implant fracture can occur, which may necessitate hardware removal. Although it may eventually occur, to date no osseointegration implant has ever required removal in the setting of periprosthetic fracture. Since TOFA implants are designed to facilitate robust bone integration, removal can be challenging. Even in cases in which portions of the implant are loose, other areas of the implant may remain strongly integrated and resist removal. Further, there can be cases in which an implant fractures, leaving the residual portion of the implant in place without the interface for an extraction tool. Although the outcomes of revision osseointegration has not been the primary focus of any publication, the fact that revision can be necessary and generally succeeds in restoring similar mobility has been documented^3-5. As with any hardware removal, preserving healthy tissue and avoiding iatrogenic injury are critically important. This article demonstrates several techniques to remove press-fit osseointegration implants that we have found safe and effective.

Description: The procedure is performed with the patient in the supine position and with the affected extremity prepared and draped in a typical sterile fashion. The use of a tourniquet can help reduce blood loss, but it may be safer to not use a tourniquet during the portions of the procedure that create increased or prolonged bone thermal exposure, such as during reaming or drilling. If patients are clinically stable, withholding antibiotics until cultures are obtained may improve diagnostic yield. The implant removal technique should proceed from conservative to aggressive, as necessary: slap hammer, thin wire-assisted slap hammer, and extended osteotomy. Trephine reaming is discouraged because of the need for and difficulty of removing the dual cone interface portion of the implant, along with the extensive damage often caused to the surrounding bone during reaming, which can be avoided with the osteotomy technique.

Alternatives: It is important to emphasize that most infections related to transcutaneous osseointegration do not require implant removal; the use of antibiotics alone or soft-tissue and/or limited bone debridement is sufficient to resolve infection in the majority of cases. If a patient has a non-infectious indication for removal (such as a loose implant) but declines surgery, activity modification with close observation may be reasonable. If a patient has an infectious indication for removal but declines surgery, very close observation must be maintained to avoid potential osteomyelitis. The use of

Background: "Coronal split/overlap repair" patellar tendon shortening (PTS) is a technique that is utilized to treat patella alta and can be combined with distal femoral extension osteotomy (DFEO) for the treatment of crouch gait in skeletally immature patients with cerebral palsy.

Description: The patellar tendon is split in the coronal plane. The ventral patellar tendon flap is released from its patellar attachment and is reflected distally over its tibial attachment, exposing a dorsal flap. Two patellar/tibial no. 5 Ethibond (Ethicon) sutures are passed through 2 crossing patellar tunnels and 2 parallel tibial tunnels. The patella is then pushed distally until its distal pole lies at the level of the tibiofemoral joint. The Ethibond sutures are tied and tensioned to the desired level. The knee should be able to be passively flexed to 90°. The intact redundant dorsal flap of the patellar tendon is imbricated. Lastly, the ventral flap is advanced proximally and sutured to the anterior surface of the patella and to the edges of the dorsal flap without shortening. A hinged knee brace is utilized postoperatively with a range of motion of 0° to 30°, progressing to 90° by 6 weeks. No resistive quadriceps contractions are permitted for the first 3 weeks.

Alternatives: Patellar tendon advancement in skeletally immature patients can be performed by releasing the tibial attachment and the free end is advanced deep to the T-shaped tibial periosteal flap^1-3. Other PTS techniques can be grouped into the categories of (1) patellar tendon imbrication⁴, (2) patellar tendon detaching techniques in which the tendon is detached from the patellar attachment or cut in its midsubstance and shortened^2,5-7, and (3) patellar tendon semi-detaching techniques in which patellar tendon flaps are created and shortened^8,9.

Rationale: The presently described technique is a semi-detaching technique, preserving a good part of the patellar tendon while avoiding complete dehiscence of the extensor mechanism. Moreover, the 2 patellar/tibial sutures would protect the patellar tendon repair and allow early rehabilitation and knee range-of-motion exercises.

Expected outcomes: Satisfactory correction of the patella alta was reported with PTS techniques with or without DFEO to correct concomitant fixed flexion deformity in patients with cerebral palsy. Furthermore, there was reported improvement of total knee range of motion with restoration of adequate knee extension during the stance phase^1,3,8. Reported complications with this technique were mainly superficial infection.

Important tips: Any substantial fixed flexion deformity of the knee (>10°) should be corrected with hamstring lengthening or DFEO prior to PTS.A mid-patellar coronal split is made with use of a no.-15 blade and extended proximall