首页 > 最新文献

JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques最新文献

英文 中文
Intramedullary Screw Fixation for Simple Olecranon Fractures. 单纯性鹰嘴骨折髓内螺钉固定。
IF 1 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-04-21 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00077
Tyler Thorne, Makoa Mau, Willie Dong, Leonard Lisitano, Zarek DaSilva, David L Rothberg, Thomas F Higgins, Justin M Haller, Lucas S Marchand

Background: Olecranon fractures are common injuries that often require surgical fixation to maintain elbow function. Nonoperative management of these injuries may be indicated in the elderly, as a recent randomized controlled trial found that 81% (9) of 11 operatively managed olecranon fractures in the elderly had complications1. While traditional techniques such as tension-band wiring and plate fixation produced satisfactory functional outcomes, they are associated with high rates of complications2. Intramedullary screw fixation has gained popularity as an alternative technique for transverse olecranon fractures. The goal of this procedure is to reduce complication rates associated with olecranon open reduction and internal fixation while maintaining optimal functional outcomes.

Description: The patient is positioned in the lateral decubitus position with the arm placed over a padded Mayo stand. A direct posterior incision is made to the olecranon. Following irrigation and hematoma evacuation, the fracture is reduced. Pointed reduction clamps are used to reduce the fracture and hold a provisional reduction. A 2 to 2.5-cm longitudinal incision is made over the footprint of the triceps insertion. Next, a 3.5-mm drill is passed from the olecranon tip to the proximal ulnar diaphysis. The proximal ulna is then opened with a 4.5-mm drill, and a 6.5-mm calibrated tap is used to sound the ulna. Then a 6.5-mm, solid, partially threaded screw with a washer is placed across the fracture. Reduction aids are removed, and the surgical site is closed. The arm is splinted for 2 weeks to allow for soft-tissue healing, after which immediate full, active range of motion is allowed.

Alternatives: Alternatives include nonoperative treatment such as immobilization with a posterior long-arm splint, operative treatment with tension-band wiring, and operative treatment with plate and screw fixation.

Rationale: Because of the high rates of stiffness, contracture, and joint involvement associated with nonoperative treatment of olecranon fractures, operative treatment of these injuries is often recommended3. The most common types of surgical fixation include tension-band wiring or a plate-and-screw construct. Both techniques successfully lead to fracture healing and satisfactory functional outcomes; however, the main drawback of these procedures is their high rate of complications2. A prior study reported complications in 19 (63%) of 30 patients with tension-band wiring and in 12 (38%) of 32 patients with plate-and-screw constructs. Symptomatic hardware, skin breakdown, and subsequent infection made up most of these complications2. In contrast, intramedullary screw fixation utilizes low-profile hardware that is seated within the osseous cortex. This reduces soft-tissue irritation in a region that contains low proportions of subcuta

背景:鹰嘴骨折是常见的损伤,通常需要手术固定来维持肘关节功能。这些损伤的非手术治疗可能适用于老年人,因为最近的一项随机对照试验发现,在11例手术治疗的老年人鹰嘴骨折中,81%(9)有并发症。虽然传统技术如张力带钢丝和钢板固定产生了令人满意的功能结果,但它们与高并发症率相关2。髓内螺钉固定作为横尺骨鹰嘴骨折的一种替代技术已经得到了广泛的应用。该手术的目的是减少鹰嘴切开复位和内固定相关的并发症发生率,同时保持最佳的功能结果。描述:患者侧卧位,手臂置于有衬垫的Mayo支架上。直接在鹰嘴后方切开。冲洗和血肿清除后,骨折复位。尖头复位钳用于复位骨折并保持临时复位。在肱三头肌止点处做一个2 - 2.5 cm的纵向切口。接下来,从鹰嘴尖端穿过3.5毫米的钻头至尺骨干近端。然后用4.5毫米的钻头打开近端尺骨,并用6.5毫米校准的水龙头对尺骨发出声音。然后在骨折处放置一个6.5毫米的实心部分螺纹螺钉,并带垫圈。移除复位辅助工具,关闭手术部位。用夹板固定手臂2周以使软组织愈合,之后立即允许充分的活动范围。备选方案:备选方案包括非手术治疗,如后路长臂夹板固定,张力带钢丝手术治疗,以及钢板螺钉固定手术治疗。理由:由于非手术治疗鹰嘴骨折会导致僵硬、挛缩和关节受累的高发,因此通常推荐手术治疗。最常见的手术固定类型包括张力带钢丝或钢板-螺钉结构。这两种技术都成功地导致骨折愈合和令人满意的功能结果;然而,这些手术的主要缺点是并发症的高发生率。先前的一项研究报告了30例张力带钢丝患者中19例(63%)和32例钢板-螺钉结构患者中12例(38%)的并发症。症状性硬体、皮肤破裂和随后的感染构成了这些并发症的大部分。相比之下,髓内螺钉固定采用位于骨皮质内的低轮廓硬体。这减少了含有低比例皮下组织的区域对软组织的刺激。然而,对于粉碎性骨折或鹰嘴骨折伴肘关节不稳的患者,单用髓内螺钉固定是禁忌的。目前所描述的技术主要用于单纯性、横向鹰嘴骨折或鹰嘴截骨术的修复。预期结果:接受髓内螺钉固定治疗鹰嘴骨折的患者有良好的效果。尽管研究髓内螺钉使用的文献很少,但目前的报道表明,绝大多数患者的骨折愈合进展良好。与传统技术相比,患者在很大程度上实现了全活动范围、良好的功能预后和低失败率4-8。值得注意的是,接受髓内螺钉固定的患者并发症发生率明显较低,再手术率为18%(199例患者中有35例)。在控制混杂因素的情况下,髓内螺钉固定与钢板-螺钉固定相比,将二次手术的几率降低了54%。总的来说,不同结构的再手术率如下:髓内螺钉固定,18%(199例中的35例);张力带,24% (31 / 128);板型结构,13%(29 / 229)。重要提示:采用后路入路时,应沿肘部外侧弯曲切口,以防止尺神经损伤和倚肘时瘢痕刺激。不正确的入钉点或螺钉轨迹会导致螺钉过早与尺皮质接触,从而导致骨折间隙和/或皮质穿孔。当髓内螺钉通过时,尖复位夹和辅助固定有助于维持骨折复位。适当的术后护理和早期活动范围是手术成功的关键。缩略语:CT =计算机断层扫描。
{"title":"Intramedullary Screw Fixation for Simple Olecranon Fractures.","authors":"Tyler Thorne, Makoa Mau, Willie Dong, Leonard Lisitano, Zarek DaSilva, David L Rothberg, Thomas F Higgins, Justin M Haller, Lucas S Marchand","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Olecranon fractures are common injuries that often require surgical fixation to maintain elbow function. Nonoperative management of these injuries may be indicated in the elderly, as a recent randomized controlled trial found that 81% (9) of 11 operatively managed olecranon fractures in the elderly had complications<sup>1</sup>. While traditional techniques such as tension-band wiring and plate fixation produced satisfactory functional outcomes, they are associated with high rates of complications<sup>2</sup>. Intramedullary screw fixation has gained popularity as an alternative technique for transverse olecranon fractures. The goal of this procedure is to reduce complication rates associated with olecranon open reduction and internal fixation while maintaining optimal functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>The patient is positioned in the lateral decubitus position with the arm placed over a padded Mayo stand. A direct posterior incision is made to the olecranon. Following irrigation and hematoma evacuation, the fracture is reduced. Pointed reduction clamps are used to reduce the fracture and hold a provisional reduction. A 2 to 2.5-cm longitudinal incision is made over the footprint of the triceps insertion. Next, a 3.5-mm drill is passed from the olecranon tip to the proximal ulnar diaphysis. The proximal ulna is then opened with a 4.5-mm drill, and a 6.5-mm calibrated tap is used to sound the ulna. Then a 6.5-mm, solid, partially threaded screw with a washer is placed across the fracture. Reduction aids are removed, and the surgical site is closed. The arm is splinted for 2 weeks to allow for soft-tissue healing, after which immediate full, active range of motion is allowed.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Alternatives include nonoperative treatment such as immobilization with a posterior long-arm splint, operative treatment with tension-band wiring, and operative treatment with plate and screw fixation.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Because of the high rates of stiffness, contracture, and joint involvement associated with nonoperative treatment of olecranon fractures, operative treatment of these injuries is often recommended<sup>3</sup>. The most common types of surgical fixation include tension-band wiring or a plate-and-screw construct. Both techniques successfully lead to fracture healing and satisfactory functional outcomes; however, the main drawback of these procedures is their high rate of complications<sup>2</sup>. A prior study reported complications in 19 (63%) of 30 patients with tension-band wiring and in 12 (38%) of 32 patients with plate-and-screw constructs. Symptomatic hardware, skin breakdown, and subsequent infection made up most of these complications<sup>2</sup>. In contrast, intramedullary screw fixation utilizes low-profile hardware that is seated within the osseous cortex. This reduces soft-tissue irritation in a region that contains low proportions of subcuta","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12011570/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143988895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Soft-Tissue Contouring and Nerve Management During Lower-Limb Osseointegration Surgery. 下肢骨整合手术中的软组织轮廓和神经管理。
IF 1 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-04-21 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00074
Anna M Vaeth, Grant G Black, Nicholas A Vernice, Lucy Wei, Clara G Choate, Albert Y Truong, Jason S Hoellwarth, Taylor J Reif, S Robert Rozbruch, David M Otterburn

Background: Osseointegration provides a direct prosthesis interface for lower-limb amputees, many of whom are poor candidates for traditional socket-suspended prostheses. These skeletally anchored implants eliminate the skin-prosthesis interface, reducing complications such as soft-tissue breakdown, ulceration, and pain1. Soft-tissue contouring and management of peripheral nerves are essential aspects of osseointegrated implantation surgery for both transfemoral and transtibial amputees. These techniques protect the bone-implant interface, prevent skin-implant friction, and reduce neuroma formation, thus mitigating complications and maximizing patient satisfaction2,3.

Description: In the present video article, we describe a technique for soft-tissue contouring during single-stage limb osseointegration that involves mobilizing the anterior and posterior musculature to cover the bone-implant interface without excess4. Peripheral nerves (i.e., the sciatic and femoral nerves for transfemoral osseointegration and the common peroneal, sural, and posterior tibial nerves for transtibial osseointegration) are identified, and targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is performed on each nerve. A regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) may also be utilized if there is a large size discrepancy during nerve coaptation. We excise redundant soft tissue, performing medial thigh lifts as needed, and resect subscarpal fat to create a posterior skin flap that is advanced over the implant. Finally, a skin aperture is created in the skin flap, through which the implant can attach to the prosthesis. Appropriate tension on the skin aperture is needed to allow for drainage and to avoid necrosis while preventing bacterial ingress into the surgical site.

Alternatives: Alternatives to osseointegration include maximizing the functionality and comfort of a socket prosthesis, either by refitting the prosthesis or by revising the soft tissue of the residual limb. However, both of these strategies have been shown to lead to lower health-related quality of life and are not cost-effective techniques when compared with osseointegration5,6.

Rationale: Lower-limb osseointegration is particularly beneficial for patients who have the desire to walk and are unable to tolerate traditional socket prostheses because of issues related to poor fit, pain, high metabolic demand, and/or skin breakdown7. Osseointegration has been shown to increase quality of life and reduce health-care costs in these patients. The efficacy and outcomes of osseointegration are not impacted by amputation etiology or history of vascular disease, making it a sound option for patients of all backgrounds.

Expected outcomes: Single-institution studies and systematic reviews have shown that lower-limb osseointegration is safe and effective, often result

背景:骨整合为下肢截肢者提供了一种直接的假肢接口,许多下肢截肢者不适合传统的支架悬浮式假肢。这些骨骼固定的植入物消除了皮肤与假体的接触面,减少了软组织破裂、溃疡和疼痛等并发症。软组织轮廓和周围神经的管理是经股骨和经胫骨截肢者骨整合植入手术的重要方面。这些技术保护骨-种植体界面,防止皮肤-种植体摩擦,减少神经瘤的形成,从而减轻并发症并最大限度地提高患者满意度2,3。描述:在这篇视频文章中,我们描述了一种在单阶段肢体骨整合过程中进行软组织轮廓的技术,该技术涉及到调动前后肌肉组织以不过量地覆盖骨-种植体界面。识别周围神经(即用于经股骨融合的坐骨神经和股神经以及用于经胫骨骨融合的腓总神经、腓肠神经和胫后神经),并对每条神经进行靶向肌肉再神经支配(TMR)。再生周围神经界面(RPNI)也可用于在神经融合过程中存在较大的尺寸差异。我们切除多余的软组织,根据需要进行大腿内侧的提抬,并切除scarpal下脂肪,在植入物上方形成一个后皮瓣。最后,在皮瓣上形成一个皮肤孔,通过这个孔,植入物可以附着在假体上。需要在皮肤孔上施加适当的张力,以便引流,避免坏死,同时防止细菌进入手术部位。替代方案:骨整合的替代方案包括通过重新组装假体或修改残肢的软组织来最大限度地提高假体的功能和舒适度。然而,与骨整合相比,这两种策略都被证明会导致较低的健康相关生活质量,并且不是经济有效的技术5,6。基本原理:下肢骨整合对那些有行走欲望,但由于不适合、疼痛、高代谢需求和/或皮肤破损等问题而无法忍受传统的骨臼假体的患者特别有益。骨整合已被证明可以提高这些患者的生活质量并降低医疗保健费用。骨整合的疗效和结果不受截肢病因或血管疾病史的影响,使其成为所有背景的患者的良好选择。预期结果:单机构研究和系统综述表明,下肢骨整合是安全有效的,通常会改善活动能力和生活质量8,9。在软组织预后方面,我们证明了较低的感染率(28%)和手术翻修率(10%),尽管这些并发症仍然对该患者队列构成挑战10。感染的发生率在术后最初几周和几个月特别高,因为皮肤孔开始愈合并密封植入物周围。我们也报道了术后神经瘤的低发生率(7%)。尽管TMR和RPNI的使用尚未在骨整合特异性队列中进行正式研究,但这些技术对下肢截肢者的残肢痛和幻肢痛具有强烈的积极作用11,12。重要提示:理想情况下,在后皮瓣末端和皮肤开口之间应至少留有4厘米的空间,以尽量减少皮肤坏死的风险。用绗缝缝合后皮瓣可以增强轮廓并减少死亡空间。RPNI可以与TMR一起用于周围神经管理,特别是当供体神经和受体神经大小不匹配时。术后皮肤缝隙并发症可通过局部抗生素(治疗感染)、硝酸银(治疗肉芽肿)、脂肪移植和/或类固醇注射(治疗疼痛)来解决。周围神经管理面临的挑战包括TMR或RPNI无法阻止神经瘤的生长,导致幻肢痛和/或残肢痛。缩写词:TMR =靶向肌肉再生神经rpni =再生周围神经界面aka =膝上截肢bka =膝下截肢jp =杰克逊-普拉特引流iv =静脉注射。
{"title":"Soft-Tissue Contouring and Nerve Management During Lower-Limb Osseointegration Surgery.","authors":"Anna M Vaeth, Grant G Black, Nicholas A Vernice, Lucy Wei, Clara G Choate, Albert Y Truong, Jason S Hoellwarth, Taylor J Reif, S Robert Rozbruch, David M Otterburn","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00074","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osseointegration provides a direct prosthesis interface for lower-limb amputees, many of whom are poor candidates for traditional socket-suspended prostheses. These skeletally anchored implants eliminate the skin-prosthesis interface, reducing complications such as soft-tissue breakdown, ulceration, and pain<sup>1</sup>. Soft-tissue contouring and management of peripheral nerves are essential aspects of osseointegrated implantation surgery for both transfemoral and transtibial amputees. These techniques protect the bone-implant interface, prevent skin-implant friction, and reduce neuroma formation, thus mitigating complications and maximizing patient satisfaction<sup>2,3</sup>.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>In the present video article, we describe a technique for soft-tissue contouring during single-stage limb osseointegration that involves mobilizing the anterior and posterior musculature to cover the bone-implant interface without excess<sup>4</sup>. Peripheral nerves (i.e., the sciatic and femoral nerves for transfemoral osseointegration and the common peroneal, sural, and posterior tibial nerves for transtibial osseointegration) are identified, and targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is performed on each nerve. A regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) may also be utilized if there is a large size discrepancy during nerve coaptation. We excise redundant soft tissue, performing medial thigh lifts as needed, and resect subscarpal fat to create a posterior skin flap that is advanced over the implant. Finally, a skin aperture is created in the skin flap, through which the implant can attach to the prosthesis. Appropriate tension on the skin aperture is needed to allow for drainage and to avoid necrosis while preventing bacterial ingress into the surgical site.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Alternatives to osseointegration include maximizing the functionality and comfort of a socket prosthesis, either by refitting the prosthesis or by revising the soft tissue of the residual limb. However, both of these strategies have been shown to lead to lower health-related quality of life and are not cost-effective techniques when compared with osseointegration<sup>5,6</sup>.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Lower-limb osseointegration is particularly beneficial for patients who have the desire to walk and are unable to tolerate traditional socket prostheses because of issues related to poor fit, pain, high metabolic demand, and/or skin breakdown<sup>7</sup>. Osseointegration has been shown to increase quality of life and reduce health-care costs in these patients. The efficacy and outcomes of osseointegration are not impacted by amputation etiology or history of vascular disease, making it a sound option for patients of all backgrounds.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>Single-institution studies and systematic reviews have shown that lower-limb osseointegration is safe and effective, often result","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12011565/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144023115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hyperselective Neurectomy for Spastic Flexion-Pronation Deformity of the Forearm and Wrist Using Local Anesthesia without a Tourniquet. 局部麻醉下不带止血带的超选择性神经切除术治疗前臂和手腕痉挛性屈伸畸形。
IF 1.6 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-03-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00018
J Terrence Jose Jerome
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spasticity in the upper limb following stroke or traumatic brain injury substantially impairs function and quality of life by affecting the flexor and adductor muscles. Spasticity commonly presents with deformities such as shoulder adduction and internal rotation, elbow flexion, forearm pronation, wrist flexion, finger flexion, and thumb adduction-commonly referred to as "thumb-in-palm" deformity. As the spasticity is incurable, surgical interventions aim to improve function and aesthetics, and facilitate daily care. Procedures such as tendon transfers and fractional lengthening can be limited by persistent spasticity, which may mask the underlying pathology, leading to misjudgments during surgery. Hyperselective neurectomy (HSN) is a surgical technique targeting specific motor nerve branches to reduce spasticity while preserving voluntary function. Traditionally performed with the patient under general anesthesia, HSN presents challenges, as the relaxed muscles may obscure the degree of spasticity. Performing HSN with the patient receiving local anesthesia and without the use of a tourniquet offers real-time evaluation of muscle function, enabling precise surgical adjustments and minimizing unnecessary nerve resection. Additionally, HSN provides flexibility to incorporate tendon transfers or fractional lengthening intraoperatively, as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>With the patient under local anesthesia, a longitudinal incision exposes the median and ulnar nerves from the elbow to the forearm. The median nerve branches innervate the pronator teres, flexor carpi radialis (FCR), flexor digitorum profundus (FDP), and flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), while the anterior interosseous nerve innervates the flexor pollicis longus. The ulnar nerve innervates the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) and FDP, with branches arising near the medial epicondyle. Selective neurectomy targets two-thirds to three-quarters of the nerve fascicles responsible for spastic movements, preserving sufficient fascicles for voluntary control. For example, patients with flexion-pronation deformities and weak wrist dorsiflexion may benefit from neurectomy of the pronator teres and wrist flexor branches. No cauterization is applied proximal to the nerve stumps in order to avoid further complications. The surgeon can also consider tendon transfers, such as transferring the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) to the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) in order to enhance wrist dorsiflexion. After partial neurectomy of the flexor pollicis longus, the patient can demonstrate thumb extension intraoperatively. The use of local rather than general anesthesia allows continuous feedback from the awake patient, ensuring accurate spasticity reduction and helping to assess the need for further interventions. Intraoperative neurostimulation aids in accurately identifying motor branches and avoiding sensory nerves. This method enables fine-tuning of
背景:中风或外伤性脑损伤后上肢痉挛会影响屈肌和内收肌,从而严重损害功能和生活质量。痉挛通常表现为肩部内收和内旋、肘关节屈曲、前臂旋前、手腕屈曲、手指屈曲和拇指内收——通常被称为“拇指在掌”畸形。由于痉挛是无法治愈的,手术干预的目的是改善功能和美观,并方便日常护理。肌腱转移和分式延长等手术可因持续痉挛而受到限制,这可能掩盖了潜在的病理,导致手术时的错误判断。超选择性神经切除术(HSN)是一种针对特定运动神经分支的手术技术,以减少痉挛,同时保持自主功能。传统上,患者在全身麻醉下进行HSN,但HSN存在挑战,因为放松的肌肉可能会模糊痉挛的程度。在患者接受局部麻醉且不使用止血带的情况下进行HSN可以实时评估肌肉功能,实现精确的手术调整并最大限度地减少不必要的神经切除。此外,HSN为术中适当地合并肌腱转移或部分延长提供了灵活性。描述:患者在局部麻醉下,通过纵向切口暴露肘部至前臂的正中神经和尺神经。正中神经分支支配旋前圆肌、桡腕屈肌(FCR)、趾深屈肌(FDP)和趾浅屈肌(FDS),而前骨间神经支配拇长屈肌。尺神经支配尺腕屈肌(FCU)和FDP,分支在内侧上髁附近产生。选择性神经切除术的目标是负责痉挛运动的三分之二到四分之三的神经束,保留足够的神经束用于自主控制。例如,屈曲-旋前畸形和弱腕背屈的患者可能受益于旋前圆肌和腕屈肌分支的神经切除术。为了避免进一步的并发症,在神经残端不进行烧灼。外科医生也可以考虑肌腱转移,如将尺侧腕伸肌(ECU)转移到桡侧腕短伸肌(ECRB),以增强腕背屈。拇长屈肌部分神经切除后,患者术中可表现拇指伸展。使用局部麻醉而不是全身麻醉,可以从清醒的患者那里得到持续的反馈,确保准确的痉挛减轻,并有助于评估进一步干预的需要。术中神经刺激有助于准确识别运动分支,避免感觉神经。这种方法可以微调神经切除术,以达到最佳效果,而不会过度切除可能损害肌肉力量的神经。替代疗法:痉挛的替代疗法包括物理疗法、口服药物、肉毒杆菌毒素注射和鞘内巴氯芬泵。然而,这些选择可能效果有限,有副作用,或者需要更多的研究。理由:选择性神经切除术比其他治疗方法有几个优点。(1)有针对性的方法。与全身性药物或全身性神经阻滞不同,HSN专门针对引起痉挛的神经,而不影响其他肌肉。(2)持久的效果。而药物和肉毒杆菌毒素提供暂时的缓解,HSN提供更持久的痉挛缓解。(3)功能改进。该程序增强了特定的动作,如手腕背屈和拇指伸展。它也允许术中需要的肌腱转移,以解决持续性畸形。HSN通常不是一线治疗,但在非手术治疗失败时考虑。HSN特别适用于局灶性痉挛患者,这些患者保留了一些自主控制能力,并且具有足够的被动活动范围。该手术也可与单节段多节段手术联合进行更全面的上肢重建。预期结果:接受HSN的患者可以预期痉挛显著减少,运动功能范围改善1。在一项包括18例涉及旋前圆的HSN手术的前瞻性试验中,Leclercq等人2,3报道了在最近的随访中前臂静止位置和痉挛参数的显著改善。在腕屈肌(包括FCR、FCU和旋前圆肌)上进行类似的手术,在不影响屈肌力量的情况下,显示出适度的手腕伸展改善。Hysong et al.1报道,House的得分从2.2提高到3。 平均4例,93%的患者达到手术目标,无术后并发症或永久性力量丧失报告。虽然结果可能因患者个体因素而异,但HSN在功能和痉挛控制方面提供了持久的改善,有助于提高患者满意度。额外的肌腱转移可以进一步改善预后。重要提示:HSN的理想候选者表现为局灶性痉挛,对非手术治疗无反应,手腕和手指屈肌功能正常,伸肌无力。局部麻醉不带止血带,可以实时刺激神经,精确识别目标分支,使患者能够积极参与神经切除术前后的术中评估。曲线切口确保充分暴露和识别单个神经分支。仅针对引起痉挛的运动肌束,同时保留感觉分支以维持功能。肌腱转移,如ECU到ECRB,增强手腕背屈。术后康复是预防并发症和最大限度地提高功能的关键。解剖变异会使神经识别复杂化。过度的肌束切除可能导致意想不到的肌肉无力。切除不充分可能不能充分减轻痉挛。潜在的并发症包括感染、血肿、神经损伤和慢性疼痛。缩略语:PT =旋前肌hsn =超选择性神经切除术ecu =尺侧腕伸肌ecrb =短桡侧腕伸肌fcr =桡侧腕屈肌fdp =指深屈肌fds =指浅屈肌fdp =拇长屈肌epl =拇长伸肌edm =指小伸肌ecrl =桡侧腕长伸肌walant =全觉局部麻醉无止血带fcu =尺侧腕屈肌。
{"title":"Hyperselective Neurectomy for Spastic Flexion-Pronation Deformity of the Forearm and Wrist Using Local Anesthesia without a Tourniquet.","authors":"J Terrence Jose Jerome","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00018","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00018","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Spasticity in the upper limb following stroke or traumatic brain injury substantially impairs function and quality of life by affecting the flexor and adductor muscles. Spasticity commonly presents with deformities such as shoulder adduction and internal rotation, elbow flexion, forearm pronation, wrist flexion, finger flexion, and thumb adduction-commonly referred to as \"thumb-in-palm\" deformity. As the spasticity is incurable, surgical interventions aim to improve function and aesthetics, and facilitate daily care. Procedures such as tendon transfers and fractional lengthening can be limited by persistent spasticity, which may mask the underlying pathology, leading to misjudgments during surgery. Hyperselective neurectomy (HSN) is a surgical technique targeting specific motor nerve branches to reduce spasticity while preserving voluntary function. Traditionally performed with the patient under general anesthesia, HSN presents challenges, as the relaxed muscles may obscure the degree of spasticity. Performing HSN with the patient receiving local anesthesia and without the use of a tourniquet offers real-time evaluation of muscle function, enabling precise surgical adjustments and minimizing unnecessary nerve resection. Additionally, HSN provides flexibility to incorporate tendon transfers or fractional lengthening intraoperatively, as appropriate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Description: &lt;/strong&gt;With the patient under local anesthesia, a longitudinal incision exposes the median and ulnar nerves from the elbow to the forearm. The median nerve branches innervate the pronator teres, flexor carpi radialis (FCR), flexor digitorum profundus (FDP), and flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), while the anterior interosseous nerve innervates the flexor pollicis longus. The ulnar nerve innervates the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) and FDP, with branches arising near the medial epicondyle. Selective neurectomy targets two-thirds to three-quarters of the nerve fascicles responsible for spastic movements, preserving sufficient fascicles for voluntary control. For example, patients with flexion-pronation deformities and weak wrist dorsiflexion may benefit from neurectomy of the pronator teres and wrist flexor branches. No cauterization is applied proximal to the nerve stumps in order to avoid further complications. The surgeon can also consider tendon transfers, such as transferring the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) to the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) in order to enhance wrist dorsiflexion. After partial neurectomy of the flexor pollicis longus, the patient can demonstrate thumb extension intraoperatively. The use of local rather than general anesthesia allows continuous feedback from the awake patient, ensuring accurate spasticity reduction and helping to assess the need for further interventions. Intraoperative neurostimulation aids in accurately identifying motor branches and avoiding sensory nerves. This method enables fine-tuning of ","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445412/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145114171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty Through the Posterior Approach. 后路机器人辅助全髋关节置换术。
IF 1 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00010
Maria T Schwabe, Joseph T Gibian, Kimberly A Bartosiak, Ilya Bendich, Andrew M Schneider
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) through the posterior approach is indicated in cases of symptomatic hip arthritis. The goal of the procedure is to relieve pain and restore function while minimizing postoperative complications such as dislocation. Dislocation often occurs despite traditionally well placed components<sup>1,2</sup>. The hip-spine relationship can be a causative factor in postoperative instability, particularly in patients with altered spinopelvic kinematics as a result of spinal fusions or degenerative spine disease, in whom component placement based on anatomic landmarks may lead to functional malpositioning<sup>3,4</sup>. Therefore, we present our technique for robotic-assisted THA through the posterior approach, which incorporates patient-specific spinopelvic kinematic data to maximize impingement-free range of motion and minimize the risk of dislocation.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans are obtained in order to generate a 3D model of the patient's unique hip anatomy. Lateral lumbar radiographs with the patient in the sitting and standing positions are also obtained preoperatively. The sacral slope is measured in each position, imported into the robotic software, and utilized to aid in positioning the components for optimal leg length, offset, and stability of the hip replacement based on the patient's unique spino-kinematic profile. The procedure begins with 3 partially threaded pins being driven into the ipsilateral iliac crest about 2 cm posterior to the anterior superior iliac spine. The robotic pelvic array is fastened to the pins. A standard posterior approach to the hip is utilized. Skin and subcutaneous tissues are dissected down to the iliotibial band and gluteus maximus fascia. The fascia is longitudinally incised, and a small metallic pin is malleted into the distal aspect of the greater trochanter. Initial leg length and offset values are captured. The short external rotators and posterior hip capsule are elevated. The hip is dislocated, and a neck resection is made at a level determined preoperatively with use of the robotic software. The acetabulum is exposed, and osseous registration is carried out to establish a relationship between the 3D model built with use of the robotic software and the patient's anatomy in vivo. The acetabulum is single-reamed, and the final cup is impacted in the desired position. The proximal femur is broached with increasingly sized broaches until rotational and axial stability has been achieved. A trial femoral neck and head are attached to the final broach, and the hip is reduced. Posterior and anterior hip stability are assessed, and leg length and offset are rechecked via the robotic system. Once the surgeon is satisfied, the hip is dislocated, the broach is removed, and the final femoral stem and head are manually implanted. The hip is then reduced for the final time. Closure is performed acc
背景:机器人辅助全髋关节置换术(THA)通过后路是指在病例的症状性髋关节关节炎。手术的目的是减轻疼痛和恢复功能,同时尽量减少术后并发症,如脱位。尽管传统上放置良好的部件,但错位经常发生1,2。髋-脊柱关系可能是术后不稳定的一个致病因素,特别是在脊柱融合或退行性脊柱疾病导致脊柱骨盆运动学改变的患者中,基于解剖标志的组件放置可能导致功能错位3,4。因此,我们提出了通过后路机器人辅助THA的技术,该技术结合了患者特定的脊柱骨盆运动学数据,以最大限度地提高无碰撞的运动范围并最大限度地降低脱位的风险。术前计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描是为了生成患者独特的髋关节解剖的3D模型。术前还应获得患者坐位和站位的侧位腰椎x线片。在每个位置测量骶骨斜率,将其导入机器人软件,并根据患者独特的脊柱-运动学剖面来帮助定位组件,以获得最佳的腿长、偏移量和髋关节置换术的稳定性。手术开始时,在髂前上棘后约2厘米处,将3个部分螺纹的钉入同侧髂骨。机器人骨盆阵列被固定在针上。采用标准的髋关节后路入路。皮肤和皮下组织向下解剖至髂胫束和臀大肌筋膜。将筋膜纵向切开,并将一个小金属钉锤入大转子远端。捕获初始腿长和偏移值。抬高短外旋体和髋后囊。髋关节脱位,在术前使用机器人软件确定的水平处进行颈部切除术。暴露髋臼,进行骨配准,以建立使用机器人软件建立的3D模型与患者体内解剖结构之间的关系。髋臼是单孔的,最后的髋臼杯被压在期望的位置。用越来越大的拉刀拉入股骨近端,直到达到旋转和轴向稳定。将试验股骨颈和股骨头连接到最后的拉针上,并复位髋关节。评估髋关节后侧和前侧稳定性,并通过机器人系统重新检查腿长和偏移量。一旦外科医生满意,髋关节脱位,拔出拉针,人工植入最后的股骨干和股骨头。然后最后一次复位髋关节。闭合是根据外科医生的喜好进行的。其他选择:手术选择包括THA,使用手动内固定或通过其他髋关节入路导航,包括直接前入路、前外侧入路和直接外侧入路5-7。非手术治疗包括物理治疗、使用非甾体类抗炎止痛药和关节内皮质类固醇注射。理由:机器人辅助THA对于需要精确和特定的部件定位以优化髋关节稳定性的脊柱骨盆运动异常的患者特别有利。在这些患者中,手动放置相对于解剖标志的组件可能导致功能错位并最终脱位。此外,对于由于体型较大或腹肌较大、髋臼固定物残留、或髋臼严重磨损或发育不良而预期髋臼暴露或准备困难的病例,也可受益于该技术9。预期结果:通过后路接受机器人辅助THA的患者除了并发症和翻修率低外,还应期待良好的临床结果12。与人工技术相比,机器人辅助THA已被证明可以降低脱位的风险10,11。在Bendich等人的一项研究中,机器人辅助THA队列与人工THA队列相比,脱位再手术的优势比为0.3。重要提示:为了术中获得准确的腿长和偏移测量,稳定的阵列销是至关重要的。当通过机器人软件定位髋臼时,目标是最大限度地扩展捕获点,以确保杯子放置的准确性。对于身材高大或髋关节特别僵硬的患者,其股前回缩困难,应将铰刀从机械臂上断开,用手将其放入髋臼,然后再将其与机械臂重新连接。 取出髋臼前牵开器,将扩孔方向设置为倾斜50°,前倾10°。最后杯子的位置保持在期望的方向上。请记住,机器人辅助设备只是一种手术工具,其输出的质量取决于其输入的质量。如果担心假体放置错误,应进行术中x线片检查。缩略语:THA =全髋关节置换术;ct =计算机断层扫描;dvt =深静脉血栓形成;it =髂胫。
{"title":"Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty Through the Posterior Approach.","authors":"Maria T Schwabe, Joseph T Gibian, Kimberly A Bartosiak, Ilya Bendich, Andrew M Schneider","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00010","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00010","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) through the posterior approach is indicated in cases of symptomatic hip arthritis. The goal of the procedure is to relieve pain and restore function while minimizing postoperative complications such as dislocation. Dislocation often occurs despite traditionally well placed components&lt;sup&gt;1,2&lt;/sup&gt;. The hip-spine relationship can be a causative factor in postoperative instability, particularly in patients with altered spinopelvic kinematics as a result of spinal fusions or degenerative spine disease, in whom component placement based on anatomic landmarks may lead to functional malpositioning&lt;sup&gt;3,4&lt;/sup&gt;. Therefore, we present our technique for robotic-assisted THA through the posterior approach, which incorporates patient-specific spinopelvic kinematic data to maximize impingement-free range of motion and minimize the risk of dislocation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Description: &lt;/strong&gt;Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans are obtained in order to generate a 3D model of the patient's unique hip anatomy. Lateral lumbar radiographs with the patient in the sitting and standing positions are also obtained preoperatively. The sacral slope is measured in each position, imported into the robotic software, and utilized to aid in positioning the components for optimal leg length, offset, and stability of the hip replacement based on the patient's unique spino-kinematic profile. The procedure begins with 3 partially threaded pins being driven into the ipsilateral iliac crest about 2 cm posterior to the anterior superior iliac spine. The robotic pelvic array is fastened to the pins. A standard posterior approach to the hip is utilized. Skin and subcutaneous tissues are dissected down to the iliotibial band and gluteus maximus fascia. The fascia is longitudinally incised, and a small metallic pin is malleted into the distal aspect of the greater trochanter. Initial leg length and offset values are captured. The short external rotators and posterior hip capsule are elevated. The hip is dislocated, and a neck resection is made at a level determined preoperatively with use of the robotic software. The acetabulum is exposed, and osseous registration is carried out to establish a relationship between the 3D model built with use of the robotic software and the patient's anatomy in vivo. The acetabulum is single-reamed, and the final cup is impacted in the desired position. The proximal femur is broached with increasingly sized broaches until rotational and axial stability has been achieved. A trial femoral neck and head are attached to the final broach, and the hip is reduced. Posterior and anterior hip stability are assessed, and leg length and offset are rechecked via the robotic system. Once the surgeon is satisfied, the hip is dislocated, the broach is removed, and the final femoral stem and head are manually implanted. The hip is then reduced for the final time. Closure is performed acc","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11918557/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143658988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Arthroscopically Assisted Lower Trapezius Transfer Using Peroneus Longus Autograft for Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears. 关节镜下应用自体腓骨长肌移植治疗不可修复的后上肩袖撕裂下斜方肌转移。
IF 1 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00047
Silvampatti Ramasamy Sundararajan, Rajagopalakrishnan Ramakanth, Bandlapally Sreenivasa Guptha Sujith, Terence Dsouza, Karthikeyan Pratheeban, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran

Background: Massive retracted rotator cuff tears are disabling in physically active patients. In patients with persistent pain in whom nonoperative treatment has failed, multiple surgical treatment options are available. Lower trapezius tendon transfer is a promising surgical procedure that can decrease pain, improve external rotation strength, and recreate more normal glenohumeral kinematics. In the present video article, we describe the surgical technique for successful arthroscopic ("scopy")-assisted lower trapezius transfer (SALTT) with use of an easily accessible peroneus longus autograft.

Description: The patient is positioned in a beach-chair position with the ipsilateral half of the posterior shoulder girdle included in the draping for surgical access. Joint was viewed through the standard posterior and posterolateral portals, while anterolateral and anterosuperior portals were utilized as the working portals. Subacromial and superior capsular adhesions are released, and a partial cuff repair is performed. A 3 to 4-cm vertical incision is made along the scapular spine. The superior and inferior borders of the lower trapezius are delineated and completely detached from where they insert at the scapular spine. A 3-cm vertical incision is made at the posterior border of the lateral malleolus. The fascia is incised. The peroneus longus is identified and detached with the foot in maximum dorsiflexion and eversion and is harvested with use of a closed tendon stripper. Whip stiches are placed at 1 end of the autograft. With use of a large grasping clamp, starting from the anterolateral portal and aiming toward the medial scapular incision, the autograft is shuttled and the stitched end of the autograft is fixed to the humeral head with a knotless anchor. With the shoulder in maximum external rotation and 0° of abduction, tenodesis of the autograft is performed to the lower trapezius tendon with a Pulvertaft technique. The shoulder is then immobilized in 40° to 60° of external rotation in a custom brace for 6 to 8 weeks. Passive and gradual active-assisted shoulder exercises should begin at 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively.

Alternatives: Surgical alternatives for irreparable tears include partial rotator cuff repair with biceps superior capsular reconstruction, superior capsular reconstruction with fascia lata graft, subacromial balloon spacer, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Tendon transfers are preferred in younger patients.

Rationale: The lower trapezius has adequate tension, a similar line of pull as the infraspinatus, and enough tension to replace the function of the infraspinatus1. Biomechanical studies have shown that the maximum external rotation moment arm generated with use of a lower trapezius transfer with the arm at the side is superior to that with either latissimus dorsi or teres major transfer2, and lower trapezius transfe

背景:在体力活动的患者中,大量的肩袖撕裂是致残的。对于非手术治疗失败的持续性疼痛患者,有多种手术治疗选择。下斜方肌腱转移是一种很有前途的手术方法,可以减轻疼痛,提高外旋强度,并重建更正常的盂肱运动。在这篇视频文章中,我们描述了关节镜(“镜下”)辅助下斜方肌转移(SALTT)的手术技术,并使用了容易接近的腓骨长肌自体移植物。描述:患者采用沙滩椅位,后肩带的同侧一半包括在手术切口内。通过标准的后门静脉和后外侧门静脉观察关节,使用前外侧和前上门静脉作为工作门静脉。解除肩峰下和上囊粘连,进行部分袖带修复。沿肩胛骨做一个3 - 4厘米的垂直切口。下斜方肌的上下边界已经画出来并完全脱离肩胛骨处。在外踝后缘处做一个3厘米的垂直切口。切开筋膜。腓骨长肌在足部最大背屈和外翻时被识别并分离,并使用封闭肌腱剥离器切除。鞭状缝线放置在自体移植物的一端。使用大钳钳,从门静脉前外侧开始,瞄准肩胛骨内侧切口,穿梭自体移植物,用无结锚钉将缝合后的自体移植物端固定在肱骨头。当肩关节处于最大的外旋和0°外展时,采用粉塔夫脱技术将自体移植物肌腱固定到下斜方肌腱。然后使用定制支架将肩部固定在40°至60°的外旋范围内6至8周。被动和渐进式主动辅助肩部锻炼应在术后6 - 8周开始。替代方案:不可修复撕裂的手术方案包括部分肩袖修复二头肌上囊重建术、上囊重建术及阔筋膜移植物、肩峰下球囊垫片和逆行肩关节置换术。年轻患者首选肌腱转移。理由:下斜方肌有足够的张力,与冈下肌有相似的牵拉线,并且有足够的张力取代冈下肌的功能1。生物力学研究表明,使用侧侧下斜方肌转移所产生的最大外旋力矩臂优于背阔肌或大圆肌转移2,并且下斜方肌转移在技术上比其他肌腱转移技术更简单。预期结果:目前描述的手术的预期结果包括疼痛和功能的显著改善。Elhassan等人3报道了33例平均年龄53岁(31 - 66岁)的患者采用同种异体移植进行下斜方肌腱移植的结果。在平均47个月的随访中,32例患者在疼痛、SSV和DASH评分方面有显著改善。一名患者因感染需要清创,后来接受了肩关节融合术。在另一项研究中,Elhassan等报道了41例接受关节镜辅助下斜方肌转移的患者。其中,37例(90%)患者在VAS疼痛量表、SSV和DASH评分上有显著改善。另外两例术前有袖带关节病的患者因持续疼痛接受了反向肩关节置换术。其余2例患者分别在术后5个月和8个月发生外伤性破裂。Valenti和Werthel5对14例平均年龄为62岁(范围50 - 70岁)的患者进行了关节镜辅助下斜方肌移植物移植。平均随访24个月(12至36个月),臂侧外展时外旋增加24°,臂外展90°时外旋增加40°。移植后的lag sign和hornblower sign均为阴性。两名患者出现血肿,第三名患者因感染接受了翻修。重要提示:正确的病例选择是获得最佳结果的必要条件。确保肩胛骨有足够的释放,以避免困难的下斜方肌腱收获和次优的下斜方肌腱偏移。利用缝合锚钉的组合来克服由于骨质不良而导致的大结节移植物固定不足的问题。在冈下筋膜下开一个适当的窗,并使用特殊的长弯曲钳,以避免难于通过腓骨移植物。 在固定前进行多次旋转,以避免下斜方肌附着前移植物张力不足和移植物偏移。首字母缩写:SSV =肩部主观价值evas =视觉模拟量表edash =手臂、肩膀和手的残疾sst =简单肩部TestERMA =外旋力矩armADL =日常生活活动mri =磁共振成像peek =聚醚醚酮plt =腓骨长肌腱
{"title":"Arthroscopically Assisted Lower Trapezius Transfer Using Peroneus Longus Autograft for Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears.","authors":"Silvampatti Ramasamy Sundararajan, Rajagopalakrishnan Ramakanth, Bandlapally Sreenivasa Guptha Sujith, Terence Dsouza, Karthikeyan Pratheeban, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00047","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Massive retracted rotator cuff tears are disabling in physically active patients. In patients with persistent pain in whom nonoperative treatment has failed, multiple surgical treatment options are available. Lower trapezius tendon transfer is a promising surgical procedure that can decrease pain, improve external rotation strength, and recreate more normal glenohumeral kinematics. In the present video article, we describe the surgical technique for successful arthroscopic (\"scopy\")-assisted lower trapezius transfer (SALTT) with use of an easily accessible peroneus longus autograft.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>The patient is positioned in a beach-chair position with the ipsilateral half of the posterior shoulder girdle included in the draping for surgical access. Joint was viewed through the standard posterior and posterolateral portals, while anterolateral and anterosuperior portals were utilized as the working portals. Subacromial and superior capsular adhesions are released, and a partial cuff repair is performed. A 3 to 4-cm vertical incision is made along the scapular spine. The superior and inferior borders of the lower trapezius are delineated and completely detached from where they insert at the scapular spine. A 3-cm vertical incision is made at the posterior border of the lateral malleolus. The fascia is incised. The peroneus longus is identified and detached with the foot in maximum dorsiflexion and eversion and is harvested with use of a closed tendon stripper. Whip stiches are placed at 1 end of the autograft. With use of a large grasping clamp, starting from the anterolateral portal and aiming toward the medial scapular incision, the autograft is shuttled and the stitched end of the autograft is fixed to the humeral head with a knotless anchor. With the shoulder in maximum external rotation and 0° of abduction, tenodesis of the autograft is performed to the lower trapezius tendon with a Pulvertaft technique. The shoulder is then immobilized in 40° to 60° of external rotation in a custom brace for 6 to 8 weeks. Passive and gradual active-assisted shoulder exercises should begin at 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Surgical alternatives for irreparable tears include partial rotator cuff repair with biceps superior capsular reconstruction, superior capsular reconstruction with fascia lata graft, subacromial balloon spacer, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Tendon transfers are preferred in younger patients.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>The lower trapezius has adequate tension, a similar line of pull as the infraspinatus, and enough tension to replace the function of the infraspinatus<sup>1</sup>. Biomechanical studies have shown that the maximum external rotation moment arm generated with use of a lower trapezius transfer with the arm at the side is superior to that with either latissimus dorsi or teres major transfer<sup>2</sup>, and lower trapezius transfe","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11918559/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143658823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Erratum: Press-Fit Bone-Anchored Prosthesis for Individuals with Transtibial Amputation. 勘误:用于胫骨截肢患者的压合骨锚定假体。
IF 1 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-03-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.ER.23.00006
Jan Paul M Frölke, Robin Atallah, Ruud Leijendekkers

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00006.].

[此处更正文章 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00006.]。
{"title":"Erratum: Press-Fit Bone-Anchored Prosthesis for Individuals with Transtibial Amputation.","authors":"Jan Paul M Frölke, Robin Atallah, Ruud Leijendekkers","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.ER.23.00006","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.ER.23.00006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00006.].</p>","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893086/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143598076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Erratum: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery for Mitigation of Neuroma and Postamputation Pain. 勘误:再生周围神经界面(RPNI)手术减轻神经瘤和截肢后疼痛。
IF 1 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-03-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.ER.23.00009
Christine S W Best, Paul S Cederna, Theodore A Kung

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00009.].

[更正文章DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00009.]。
{"title":"Erratum: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery for Mitigation of Neuroma and Postamputation Pain.","authors":"Christine S W Best, Paul S Cederna, Theodore A Kung","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.ER.23.00009","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.ER.23.00009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00009.].</p>","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893085/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143598077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Press-Fit Bone-Anchored Prosthesis for Patients with Short Transfemoral Amputation. 加压式骨锚定假体在短段经股截肢患者中的应用。
IF 1 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-02-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00007
Jan Paul Frölke, Robin Atallah, Ruud Leijendekkers
<p><strong>Background: </strong>This video article describes the use of a bone-anchored prosthesis in patients with high above-the-knee amputations resulting in short residual limbs, most typically from trauma, cancer, infections, or dysvascular disease. The use of a socket prosthesis is usually unsuccessful in patients with a high transfemoral amputation because such prostheses have an unstable connection and often require additional waist belts for better attachment to the short residual limb. In most cases, a bone-anchored prosthesis results in substantial improvements in wear time, mobility, and quality of life in these patients. These patients may also be excellent candidates for early osseointegration implant surgery, given the knowledge that socket prostheses are rarely successful.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>This procedure is preferably performed in a single stage. After the surgical procedure, most patients stay 1 or 2 nights in the hospital, depending on the magnitude of the surgery (e.g., bilateral implantation of an osseointegration implant) and their comorbidities. Procedure steps include (1) preoperative implant planning, (2) patient positioning and setup, (3) soft-tissue correction (optional) and exposure of residual bone, (4) revision osteotomy with guided shortening, (5) preparation of the medullary canal and perpendicular cutoff plane, (6) marking of the lag screw with a custom-made aiming device and dummy prosthesis, (7) insertion of the intramedullary component with optional bone augmentation, (8) insertion of the lag screw, (9) soft-tissue contouring and closure, and (10) stoma creation and dual cone assembly.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Simultaneous major leg amputation and implantation of an osseointegration prosthesis is not advocated as treatment. First, a rehabilitation program with a socket-suspended prosthesis should be trialed before a patient can apply for a bone-anchored prosthesis. After rehabilitation, satisfaction with a socket prosthesis may be adequate, making a bone-anchored prosthesis unnecessary; however, patients with very short residual limbs and/or irregular soft-tissue conditions may be candidates for early implantation of a bone-anchored prosthesis. Contraindications for osseointegration implant surgery are severe diabetes (with complications), severe bone deformity, immature bone, bone diseases (chronic infection or metastasis), current chemotherapy, severe vascular diseases, pain without a clear cause, body mass index of >30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and smoking.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>About half of patients with a major lower-limb amputation who use an artificial leg are able to function acceptably well with use of a socket-suspended prosthesis; however, in cases with a high transfemoral amputation level, severe limitations may be expected, resulting in reduced prosthesis use, mobility, and quality of life. In these cases, energy transfer from limb to prosthesis is poor because of
背景:这篇视频文章描述了骨锚定假体在膝上高位截肢导致残肢短的患者中的应用,这些患者通常是由于创伤、癌症、感染或血管异常疾病。在高位经股截肢患者中,使用窝形假体通常是不成功的,因为这种假体连接不稳定,通常需要额外的腰带来更好地附着在短的残肢上。在大多数情况下,骨锚定假体可以显著改善这些患者的佩戴时间、活动能力和生活质量。这些患者也可能是早期骨整合种植手术的优秀候选人,因为我们知道,窝骨假体很少成功。说明:该过程最好在单阶段进行。手术后,根据手术的大小(例如,双侧骨整合种植体的植入)及其合并症,大多数患者在医院住1或2个晚上。操作步骤包括(1)术前种植体计划,(2)患者定位和设置,(3)软组织矫正(可选)和残余骨暴露,(4)引导缩短的翻修截骨术,(5)准备髓管和垂直截骨面,(6)使用定制瞄准装置和假体标记拉力螺钉,(7)可选骨增强器插入髓内组件,(8)插入拉力螺钉,(9)软组织轮廓和闭合,(10)造口和双锥装配。替代方法:不提倡同时截肢并植入骨整合假体作为治疗方法。首先,在病人可以申请骨锚固定假体之前,应该先试验使用套孔悬浮假体的康复计划。康复后,对套孔假体的满意度可能足够,无需骨锚定假体;然而,残肢非常短和/或软组织状况不规则的患者可能是早期植入骨锚定假体的候选者。严重糖尿病(伴并发症)、严重骨畸形、骨不成熟、骨疾病(慢性感染或转移)、正在化疗、严重血管疾病、不明原因疼痛、体重指数> ~ 30kg /m2、吸烟等为骨整合种植体手术禁忌症。基本原理:大约一半的下肢截肢患者使用人工腿后,使用支架悬置假体功能良好;然而,在经股截肢高度的病例中,可能会出现严重的限制,导致假体的使用、活动能力和生活质量降低。在这些情况下,由于所谓的假关节是软组织界面,从肢体到假体的能量传递很差,并且普遍存在严重的机械错位。这些问题会导致与皮肤刺激和眼窝不合适相关的并发症,导致整体满意度和对活动的信心下降。骨整合植入物在残肢和假肢之间建立了直接的骨骼连接,其中能量传递是最佳的,机械对齐从根本上得到改善。预期结果:我们进行了一项为期1年的前瞻性研究。共有16例经股骨截肢后残肢短的患者接受了gamma型骨整合种植体,并在股骨颈处附加拉力螺钉固定。大多数患者为男性,创伤性截肢,并进行了两期手术。分别使用经股骨截肢者问卷(QTFA)假体使用评分和总体评分来测量假体佩戴时间和患者健康相关生活质量。从基线到1年随访,两项指标均有显著改善。整体评分不适用于不使用假体的患者。对于基线时未使用假体的8例患者(即队列的50%),则使用全局评分的第三个问题(G3 Q3)代替。这个问题问的是:“作为一个截肢者,你会如何总结你的总体情况?”通过这个问题测量,这些患者从基线到1年随访期间的生活质量也有了实质性的改善。该手术后可能发生的不良事件包括软组织和/或骨骼感染、假体周围骨折、植入物断裂、无菌性松动和软组织冗余。在我们的研究中,只发生了软组织感染。所有浅表软组织感染均经口服抗生素治疗成功。1例深部软组织感染患者需要手术进行脓肿引流。一名患者需要额外的手术来纠正软组织的冗余。 双锥接头断裂两次;两例均在门诊成功治疗。我们的结论是这种治疗的短期效果是可以接受的。目前正在收集中期后续结果。重要提示:术前种植计划应在手术指导下使用定制的种植体设计,目的是在单一阶段完成手术。使用牵引台可能是有益的,可自由切除软组织冗余。采用水冷式动力锯切。利用透视引导钻孔。使用x线照相标记可以帮助精确定位螺钉。如果髓内组件插入过程中阻力很小,则使用骨形态发生蛋白-2 (BMP-2);使用拉力螺钉来增加稳定性。不要关闭种植体上方的筋膜。只有在有骨重建的情况下才需要进行2阶段的手术,每10到12周进行一次。根据你的机构随访计划进行定期的术后评估。缩略语:BAP =骨锚定假体isoi =骨整合植入物tofi - y =定制压合钛骨锚定股骨植入物(BADAL X;FL =股骨长度thofi - c =标准压合钛骨锚定种植体(BADAL-X;CT =计算机断层扫描dca =双锥体适配器克氏针。
{"title":"Press-Fit Bone-Anchored Prosthesis for Patients with Short Transfemoral Amputation.","authors":"Jan Paul Frölke, Robin Atallah, Ruud Leijendekkers","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00007","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00007","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;This video article describes the use of a bone-anchored prosthesis in patients with high above-the-knee amputations resulting in short residual limbs, most typically from trauma, cancer, infections, or dysvascular disease. The use of a socket prosthesis is usually unsuccessful in patients with a high transfemoral amputation because such prostheses have an unstable connection and often require additional waist belts for better attachment to the short residual limb. In most cases, a bone-anchored prosthesis results in substantial improvements in wear time, mobility, and quality of life in these patients. These patients may also be excellent candidates for early osseointegration implant surgery, given the knowledge that socket prostheses are rarely successful.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Description: &lt;/strong&gt;This procedure is preferably performed in a single stage. After the surgical procedure, most patients stay 1 or 2 nights in the hospital, depending on the magnitude of the surgery (e.g., bilateral implantation of an osseointegration implant) and their comorbidities. Procedure steps include (1) preoperative implant planning, (2) patient positioning and setup, (3) soft-tissue correction (optional) and exposure of residual bone, (4) revision osteotomy with guided shortening, (5) preparation of the medullary canal and perpendicular cutoff plane, (6) marking of the lag screw with a custom-made aiming device and dummy prosthesis, (7) insertion of the intramedullary component with optional bone augmentation, (8) insertion of the lag screw, (9) soft-tissue contouring and closure, and (10) stoma creation and dual cone assembly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Alternatives: &lt;/strong&gt;Simultaneous major leg amputation and implantation of an osseointegration prosthesis is not advocated as treatment. First, a rehabilitation program with a socket-suspended prosthesis should be trialed before a patient can apply for a bone-anchored prosthesis. After rehabilitation, satisfaction with a socket prosthesis may be adequate, making a bone-anchored prosthesis unnecessary; however, patients with very short residual limbs and/or irregular soft-tissue conditions may be candidates for early implantation of a bone-anchored prosthesis. Contraindications for osseointegration implant surgery are severe diabetes (with complications), severe bone deformity, immature bone, bone diseases (chronic infection or metastasis), current chemotherapy, severe vascular diseases, pain without a clear cause, body mass index of &gt;30 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, and smoking.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rationale: &lt;/strong&gt;About half of patients with a major lower-limb amputation who use an artificial leg are able to function acceptably well with use of a socket-suspended prosthesis; however, in cases with a high transfemoral amputation level, severe limitations may be expected, resulting in reduced prosthesis use, mobility, and quality of life. In these cases, energy transfer from limb to prosthesis is poor because of","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11841842/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143484389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prone Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Disc Disease. 俯卧腰肌转位腰椎椎间融合术治疗退行性椎间盘病。
IF 1 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00090
Daniel K Park, Philip Zakko, Matthew S Easthardt, Philip K Louie
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prone transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion (PTP) is a newer technique to treat various spinal disc pathologies. PTP is a variation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) that is performed with the patient prone rather than in the lateral decubitus position. This approach offers similar benefits of lateral spinal surgery, which include less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and quicker recovery compared with traditional open spine surgery. PTP offers additional benefits over traditional lateral positioning, with a more familiar patient position for spine surgeons, the ability to perform simultaneous posterior decompression and fusion without repositioning, and improved sagittal alignment.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>PTP is performed with the patient under general anesthesia and with use of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and electromyography (EMG) neuromonitoring. The patient is positioned prone with the aid of specialized patient positioners. Once the patient is positioned and draped, the disc space of interest is marked with use of fluoroscopic guidance. An incision is made, and blunt dissection is performed through the external oblique, internal oblique, and transversalis muscles. The psoas muscle is palpated, and dilators are placed at the target disc level under fluoroscopic guidance, with care taken to protect the peritoneum and lumbar plexus. Specialized retractors are then positioned. Anulotomy and disc removal, disc space preparation, trialing, and final interbody placement are performed. The procedure ends with obtaining hemostasis and closure of the incision.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Before surgery is performed, nonoperative treatment should be attempted, including the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physical therapy, and spinal injections. Surgical alternatives include posterior lumbar laminectomy with or without fusion, as well as other procedures in the anterior column, such as LLIF, anterior lumbar interbody fusion, oblique lumbar interbody fusion, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, and posterior lumbar interbody fusion. These alternatives must be considered, especially when working at the L4-S1 disc spaces, because of potential limitations to lateral surgery, such as in cases of high-riding iliac crests, a rising psoas, and previous abdominal surgery.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Lateral spinal surgery evolved as a means to approach the anterior column of the spine in order to treat various spine disorders, such as degenerative disc disease, tumors, infection, and spinal deformity. With the PTP procedure, the patient is in the prone rather than the lateral decubitus position, which allows the psoas muscle to retract more posteriorly because it is under tension, pulling the lumbar plexus away from the target point of the procedure. In addition, the prone position results in improved sagittal alignment compared with the lateral position. With respect
背景:俯卧经腰肌腰椎体间融合术(PTP)是一种治疗各种椎间盘病变的新技术。PTP是侧位腰椎椎体间融合术(LLIF)的一种变异,在患者俯卧位而不是侧卧位时进行。与传统的开放式脊柱手术相比,这种方法具有与侧侧脊柱手术相似的优点,包括出血量少,住院时间短,恢复速度快。与传统的侧位相比,PTP有更多的好处,脊柱外科医生更熟悉患者的体位,能够同时进行后路减压和融合,而无需重新定位,并改善矢状面对齐。描述:PTP在全身麻醉下进行,并使用体感诱发电位(SSEP)和肌电图(EMG)神经监测。在专门的病人定位器的帮助下,病人俯卧。一旦患者被定位和覆盖,利用透视引导标记感兴趣的椎间盘间隙。做一个切口,通过外斜肌、内斜肌和横肌进行钝性剥离。触诊腰肌,在透视引导下将扩张器置于目标椎间盘水平,小心保护腹膜和腰丛。然后定位专门的牵开器。进行环切和椎间盘取出,椎间盘间隙准备,试验和最后的椎间放置。手术以止血和缝合切口结束。替代方案:在进行手术前,应尝试非手术治疗,包括使用非甾体类抗炎药、物理治疗和脊柱注射。手术选择包括后路腰椎椎板切除术伴或不伴融合术,以及其他前柱手术,如LLIF、前路腰椎椎间融合术、斜路腰椎椎间融合术、经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术和后路腰椎椎间融合术。必须考虑这些替代方案,特别是在L4-S1椎间盘间隙进行手术时,因为侧位手术可能存在局限性,例如高位髂嵴、腰肌上升和既往腹部手术。理由:侧位脊柱手术作为一种接近脊柱前柱的手段而发展起来,以治疗各种脊柱疾病,如退行性椎间盘疾病、肿瘤、感染和脊柱畸形。采用PTP手术时,患者为俯卧位,而不是侧卧位,这使得腰肌处于张力下,可以更向后缩回,将腰丛从手术的目标点拉开。此外,与侧卧位相比,俯卧位可改善矢状位对齐。关于矢状面对齐,PTP手术允许更适当的平衡,从而改善临床结果。在PTP过程中,腹膜也远离手术区,为远离肠和输尿管提供了更安全的通道。由于这些原因,与侧卧位患者进行侧卧手术相比,PTP可能会改善结果,同时也可以最大限度地降低肠道和膀胱损伤和神经失用的风险。此外,PTP消除了重新定位或分阶段过程的需要。例如,患者俯卧位可有效地进行后椎板切除术和融合术,可能与PTP手术同时进行,而侧位入路则需要重新定位和重新覆盖。预期结果:与传统的后路脊柱手术相比,PTP有几个优点。这些措施包括缩短住院时间、减少失血和更快恢复活动能力。特别是与侧卧位患者的外侧入路相比,PTP可能导致更好的节段性前凸和脊柱-骨盆排列。迄今为止,侧卧和俯卧转腰肌入路的总体结果相似。重要提示:一定要调整桌子到腰高,肘部保持90°弯曲,同时要定位椎间盘空间。当通过牵开器进行椎间盘工作时,要么抬高床,要么坐在椅子上,以确保椎间盘空间与眼睛水平,这样你就不会扭伤脖子。解剖时应采用手指解剖术,避免使用电灼术,以免造成神经失用,导致斜肌松弛,引起假性疝。为减少腹膜损伤的风险,可采用双切口技术:将手指置于后侧辅助切口(中线切口或经皮螺钉切口),初步触诊横突尖端。
{"title":"Prone Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Disc Disease.","authors":"Daniel K Park, Philip Zakko, Matthew S Easthardt, Philip K Louie","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00090","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00090","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Prone transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion (PTP) is a newer technique to treat various spinal disc pathologies. PTP is a variation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) that is performed with the patient prone rather than in the lateral decubitus position. This approach offers similar benefits of lateral spinal surgery, which include less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and quicker recovery compared with traditional open spine surgery. PTP offers additional benefits over traditional lateral positioning, with a more familiar patient position for spine surgeons, the ability to perform simultaneous posterior decompression and fusion without repositioning, and improved sagittal alignment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Description: &lt;/strong&gt;PTP is performed with the patient under general anesthesia and with use of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and electromyography (EMG) neuromonitoring. The patient is positioned prone with the aid of specialized patient positioners. Once the patient is positioned and draped, the disc space of interest is marked with use of fluoroscopic guidance. An incision is made, and blunt dissection is performed through the external oblique, internal oblique, and transversalis muscles. The psoas muscle is palpated, and dilators are placed at the target disc level under fluoroscopic guidance, with care taken to protect the peritoneum and lumbar plexus. Specialized retractors are then positioned. Anulotomy and disc removal, disc space preparation, trialing, and final interbody placement are performed. The procedure ends with obtaining hemostasis and closure of the incision.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Alternatives: &lt;/strong&gt;Before surgery is performed, nonoperative treatment should be attempted, including the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physical therapy, and spinal injections. Surgical alternatives include posterior lumbar laminectomy with or without fusion, as well as other procedures in the anterior column, such as LLIF, anterior lumbar interbody fusion, oblique lumbar interbody fusion, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, and posterior lumbar interbody fusion. These alternatives must be considered, especially when working at the L4-S1 disc spaces, because of potential limitations to lateral surgery, such as in cases of high-riding iliac crests, a rising psoas, and previous abdominal surgery.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rationale: &lt;/strong&gt;Lateral spinal surgery evolved as a means to approach the anterior column of the spine in order to treat various spine disorders, such as degenerative disc disease, tumors, infection, and spinal deformity. With the PTP procedure, the patient is in the prone rather than the lateral decubitus position, which allows the psoas muscle to retract more posteriorly because it is under tension, pulling the lumbar plexus away from the target point of the procedure. In addition, the prone position results in improved sagittal alignment compared with the lateral position. With respect ","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11741209/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143013756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Surgical Technique Guide for Percutaneous Screw Fixation for Metastatic Pelvic Lesions. 骨盆转移性病变经皮螺钉内固定手术技术指南。
IF 1 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00034
Jayson Lian, Rui Yang, Noel O Akioyamen, Jichuan Wang, David H Ge, Milan K Sen, Bang Hoang, David S Geller

Background: The pelvis is one of the most common areas for metastatic bone disease. We recently described the use of a minimally invasive percutaneous screw fixation of metastatic non-periacetabular pelvic lesions, with excellent results.

Description: The procedure can be completed in a standard operating theater without the need for special instruments. In our video we describe the appropriate intraoperative patient positioning, surgical equipment, surgical approach, and obtainment of the necessary fluoroscopic views for placement of various pelvic percutaneous screws.

Alternatives: Alternative treatments include surgical procedures such as curettage, cement packing, and modified Harrington total hip arthroplasty through extensive open approaches. Additionally, as an alternative to standard fluoroscopy, intraoperative navigation and an O-arm could be utilized for the placement of screws. In our experience, intraoperative navigation has been helpful for confirmation of final screw placement and length. Overreliance on intraoperative navigation in the setting of poor bone quality and an abandonment of tactile feedback and the various tips described in this video article can lead to inadvertent extraosseous screw placement and injury. Furthermore, as navigation involves only a virtually computed image, we have found it challenging to utilize in complex, curved bones, such as the superior pubic ramus.

Rationale: Percutaneous screw fixation is safe and effective for the treatment of metastatic non-periacetabular pelvic lesions. Given the simplicity of the technique and instrumentation, and the tolerance of concomitant treatments, this approach is worthy of broader consideration.

Expected outcomes: In our recent study, 22 consecutive patients with painful non-periacetabular pelvic metastatic cancer underwent percutaneous screw fixation. There were no surgical complications. Postoperatively, there was significant improvement in visual analog scale pain scores and functional Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores, as compared with baseline3.

Important tips: Despite the simplicity of the intraoperative set-up and instrumentation, the procedure is technically demanding. Obtaining the correct fluoroscopic views and troubleshooting intraoperative hurdles can be challenging.

Acronyms and abbreviations: CT = computed tomographyASIS = anterior superior iliac spineGT = greater trochanterAP = anteroposteriorAIIS = anterior inferior iliac spineSI = sacroiliacTSTI = transsacral-transiliacVAS = visual analog scaleECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology GroupDVT = deep vein thrombosis.

背景:骨盆是转移性骨疾病最常见的部位之一。我们最近报道了使用微创经皮螺钉固定转移性非髋臼周围盆腔病变,取得了良好的效果。说明:该手术可在标准手术室完成,不需要特殊设备。在我们的视频中,我们描述了适当的术中患者体位,手术设备,手术入路,以及获得放置各种骨盆经皮螺钉所需的透视视图。替代方法:其他治疗方法包括外科手术,如刮除术、水泥填充物和经广泛开放入路的改良哈林顿全髋关节置换术。此外,作为标准透视的替代方案,术中导航和o型臂可用于放置螺钉。根据我们的经验,术中导航有助于确定最终螺钉的位置和长度。在骨质量差的情况下,过度依赖术中导航,放弃触觉反馈和本视频文章中描述的各种提示,可能导致无意中置入骨外螺钉和损伤。此外,由于导航只涉及虚拟计算机图像,我们发现在复杂,弯曲的骨骼中使用它具有挑战性,例如耻骨上支。理由:经皮螺钉内固定治疗转移性非髋臼周围盆腔病变安全有效。考虑到技术和仪器的简单性,以及伴随治疗的耐受性,这种方法值得更广泛的考虑。预期结果:在我们最近的研究中,连续22例疼痛的非髋臼周围盆腔转移癌患者接受了经皮螺钉固定。无手术并发症。术后,视觉模拟量表疼痛评分和功能性东方肿瘤合作组评分与基线相比有显著改善3。重要提示:尽管术中设置和器械简单,但该手术在技术上要求很高。获得正确的透视视图和排除术中障碍可能具有挑战性。缩略语:CT =计算机断层扫描;asis =髂前上棘;t =大粗隆;ap =髂前下棘;esi =骶髂肌;sti =经骶-经髂肌;ecog =东部肿瘤合作组织;dvt =深静脉血栓形成。
{"title":"A Surgical Technique Guide for Percutaneous Screw Fixation for Metastatic Pelvic Lesions.","authors":"Jayson Lian, Rui Yang, Noel O Akioyamen, Jichuan Wang, David H Ge, Milan K Sen, Bang Hoang, David S Geller","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00034","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pelvis is one of the most common areas for metastatic bone disease. We recently described the use of a minimally invasive percutaneous screw fixation of metastatic non-periacetabular pelvic lesions, with excellent results.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>The procedure can be completed in a standard operating theater without the need for special instruments. In our video we describe the appropriate intraoperative patient positioning, surgical equipment, surgical approach, and obtainment of the necessary fluoroscopic views for placement of various pelvic percutaneous screws.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Alternative treatments include surgical procedures such as curettage, cement packing, and modified Harrington total hip arthroplasty through extensive open approaches. Additionally, as an alternative to standard fluoroscopy, intraoperative navigation and an O-arm could be utilized for the placement of screws. In our experience, intraoperative navigation has been helpful for confirmation of final screw placement and length. Overreliance on intraoperative navigation in the setting of poor bone quality and an abandonment of tactile feedback and the various tips described in this video article can lead to inadvertent extraosseous screw placement and injury. Furthermore, as navigation involves only a virtually computed image, we have found it challenging to utilize in complex, curved bones, such as the superior pubic ramus.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Percutaneous screw fixation is safe and effective for the treatment of metastatic non-periacetabular pelvic lesions. Given the simplicity of the technique and instrumentation, and the tolerance of concomitant treatments, this approach is worthy of broader consideration.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>In our recent study, 22 consecutive patients with painful non-periacetabular pelvic metastatic cancer underwent percutaneous screw fixation. There were no surgical complications. Postoperatively, there was significant improvement in visual analog scale pain scores and functional Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores, as compared with baseline<sup>3</sup>.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>Despite the simplicity of the intraoperative set-up and instrumentation, the procedure is technically demanding. Obtaining the correct fluoroscopic views and troubleshooting intraoperative hurdles can be challenging.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>CT = computed tomographyASIS = anterior superior iliac spineGT = greater trochanterAP = anteroposteriorAIIS = anterior inferior iliac spineSI = sacroiliacTSTI = transsacral-transiliacVAS = visual analog scaleECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology GroupDVT = deep vein thrombosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11692961/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1