Pub Date : 2023-01-01Epub Date: 2023-01-30DOI: 10.1007/s40841-023-00276-5
John O'Neill
For Jean Herbison, learning in her early 20th century childhood world was relatively uncomplicated and predictable. Life was shaped by unambiguous family, faith and settler colonial prescriptions about how children should behave and what they should become. Approaching the centenary of her birth, children today must navigate a very different society of 'unlimited can'; an achievement society that generates a debilitating compulsion to self-improve (Byung Chul-Han). In this Herbison lecture, I offer a personal reflection on the contemporary 'triangle' of education research, policy and practice in Aotearoa New Zealand. Viewed as a culturally and historically specific 'form of life' (Rahel Jaeggi), I ask whether, over the last thirty five years, this triangle may have unwittingly contributed to a collective failure to give adequate recognition to children's learning. Despite our best intentions, have we simply reified students and in doing so alienated them from learning in all its complexities and dimensions (Knud Illeris)? More than mere acknowledgement of 'the other', recognition theory highlights the importance of socially developed qualities such as confidence, respect and esteem (Axel Honneth) to each child's capacity to develop meaningful relationships to or 'resonance' with an ever accelerating and uncontrollable world (Hartmut Rosa) and the people and communities in it. In practical terms, then, what can we draw on that is already immanent in our research, policy and practice triangle to transform children's institutionalised learning?
{"title":"Recognition of Children's Learning in Educational Research, Policy and Practice: Herbison Invited Lecture, NZARE Annual Conference 2022.","authors":"John O'Neill","doi":"10.1007/s40841-023-00276-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40841-023-00276-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For Jean Herbison, learning in her early 20th century childhood world was relatively uncomplicated and predictable. Life was shaped by unambiguous family, faith and settler colonial prescriptions about how children <i>should</i> behave and what they should become. Approaching the centenary of her birth, children today must navigate a very different society of 'unlimited <i>can'</i>; an achievement society that generates a debilitating compulsion to self-improve (Byung Chul-Han). In this Herbison lecture, I offer a personal reflection on the contemporary 'triangle' of education research, policy and practice in Aotearoa New Zealand. Viewed as a culturally and historically specific 'form of life' (Rahel Jaeggi), I ask whether, over the last thirty five years, this triangle may have unwittingly contributed to a collective failure to give adequate recognition to children's learning. Despite our best intentions, have we simply reified students and in doing so alienated them from learning in all its complexities and dimensions (Knud Illeris)? More than mere acknowledgement of 'the other', recognition theory highlights the importance of socially developed qualities such as confidence, respect and esteem (Axel Honneth) to each child's capacity to develop meaningful relationships to or 'resonance' with an ever accelerating and uncontrollable world (Hartmut Rosa) and the people and communities in it. In practical terms, then, what can we draw on that is already immanent in our research, policy and practice triangle to transform children's institutionalised learning?</p>","PeriodicalId":44884,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9885903/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9919193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01Epub Date: 2023-05-06DOI: 10.1007/s40841-023-00285-4
Cherie Chu-Fuluifaga, Martyn Reynolds
Pacific education is an area of priority in Aotearoa New Zealand. It involves the teaching of Pacific students by a workforce that is largely of European origin. Pacific communities value education and have the capability to contribute to the understandings of teachers as they seek to provide the kinds of service that communities want to see. This article reports on a Teaching and Learning Research Initiative (TLRI), Learning From Each Other. Leveraging talanoa as a dialogic research approach, the initiative examines the change value of Pacific voice in enhancing teacher understanding and promoting deliberate action to improve Pacific education. We present findings organised by spaces in which educators enact change using a contextualised revision of Bronfenbrenner's ecological model as a mapping tool. What emerges is a sense of how non-Pacific educators' growing Pacific-informed understandings support Pacific learners in personal, classroom and institutional spaces.
{"title":"Teachers Responding to Pacific Community Voice: Supporting Relationships Through an Ecological Research Initiative.","authors":"Cherie Chu-Fuluifaga, Martyn Reynolds","doi":"10.1007/s40841-023-00285-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40841-023-00285-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pacific education is an area of priority in Aotearoa New Zealand. It involves the teaching of Pacific students by a workforce that is largely of European origin. Pacific communities value education and have the capability to contribute to the understandings of teachers as they seek to provide the kinds of service that communities want to see. This article reports on a Teaching and Learning Research Initiative (TLRI), <i>Learning From Each Other</i>. Leveraging talanoa as a dialogic research approach, the initiative examines the change value of Pacific voice in enhancing teacher understanding and promoting deliberate action to improve Pacific education. We present findings organised by spaces in which educators enact change using a contextualised revision of Bronfenbrenner's ecological model as a mapping tool. What emerges is a sense of how non-Pacific educators' growing Pacific-informed understandings support Pacific learners in personal, classroom and institutional spaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":44884,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10163847/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10284788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01Epub Date: 2023-05-16DOI: 10.1007/s40841-023-00286-3
Nesta Devine, Georgina Tuari Stewart, Daniel Couch
{"title":"And Slowly to School…Reflecting on Recent School Attendance Reports.","authors":"Nesta Devine, Georgina Tuari Stewart, Daniel Couch","doi":"10.1007/s40841-023-00286-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40841-023-00286-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44884,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10187510/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9952365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Western literacy theories and models often reflect Eurocentric notions of literacy and literacy practices. In Aotearoa New Zealand, the prevalence of these conceptualisations is linked to issues of power and result in a narrow and inaccurate framing of Māori tamariki (children). In this article Tiritiria, a Māori philosophical view of knowledge, knowledge generation and knowledge exchange is used alongside Webber and Macfarlane's (2020) Mana Model to challenge this dominant framing of literacy. Using the whakataukī 'Ko te mana o te tamaiti te aro o tātou mahi', translated literally as 'Let the mana of the child guide our work', tamariki Māori are (re)positioned as maurea (treasures) to further support the (re)framing of literacies. In this study we focus on listening to the voices of whānau Māori from Te Tai Tokerau (Northland, New Zealand), including the voices of tūpuna (ancestors). Through a developing understanding of tiritiria and an analysis of data sets from Tai Tokerau a nascent definition of literacies, as multitudinous, practical enactments of tirititia, emerged. Findings indicated that Māori literacy practices (both traditional and contemporary) move beyond subject learning, to incorporate multiple interpersonal, cultural, environmental and textual processes of knowledge transfer which affirm the inherent and inherited mana of tamariki.
西方的扫盲理论和模式往往反映了以欧洲为中心的扫盲观念和扫盲实践。在新西兰奥特罗阿,这些概念的流行与权力问题有关,并导致对Māori tamariki(儿童)的狭隘和不准确的框架。在本文Tiritiria中,Māori关于知识、知识生成和知识交换的哲学观点与韦伯和麦克法兰(2020)的Mana模型一起使用,以挑战这种占主导地位的识字框架。使用whakatauk 'Ko te mana o te tamaiti te aro o tātou mahi',直译为“让儿童的mana指导我们的工作”,tamariki Māori被(重新)定位为maurea(宝藏),以进一步支持(重新)构建识字能力。在这项研究中,我们重点听取了来自新西兰北部泰托克劳岛whānau Māori的声音,包括tūpuna(祖先)的声音。通过对识字的不断发展的理解和对来自大托克劳的数据集的分析,出现了对识字的初步定义,即大量实际的识字颁布。研究结果表明Māori识字实践(传统和现代)超越了学科学习,纳入了多种人际、文化、环境和文本的知识转移过程,这些过程肯定了tamariki的固有和继承的mana。
{"title":"Ko te mana o te tamaiti te aro o tātou mahi: Listening to voices from Tai Tokerau to re-frame literacies.","authors":"Maia Hetaraka, Selena Meiklejohn-Whiu, Melinda Webber, Rebecca Jesson","doi":"10.1007/s40841-023-00290-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40841-023-00290-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Western literacy theories and models often reflect Eurocentric notions of literacy and literacy practices. In Aotearoa New Zealand, the prevalence of these conceptualisations is linked to issues of power and result in a narrow and inaccurate framing of Māori tamariki (children). In this article Tiritiria, a Māori philosophical view of knowledge, knowledge generation and knowledge exchange is used alongside Webber and Macfarlane's (2020) Mana Model to challenge this dominant framing of literacy. Using the whakataukī 'Ko te mana o te tamaiti te aro o tātou mahi', translated literally as 'Let the mana of the child guide our work', tamariki Māori are (re)positioned as maurea (treasures) to further support the (re)framing of literacies. In this study we focus on listening to the voices of whānau Māori from Te Tai Tokerau (Northland, New Zealand), including the voices of tūpuna (ancestors). Through a developing understanding of tiritiria and an analysis of data sets from Tai Tokerau a nascent definition of literacies, as multitudinous, practical enactments of tirititia, emerged. Findings indicated that Māori literacy practices (both traditional and contemporary) move beyond subject learning, to incorporate multiple interpersonal, cultural, environmental and textual processes of knowledge transfer which affirm the inherent and inherited mana of tamariki.</p>","PeriodicalId":44884,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661808/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48774385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Many theories support the idea that children's literacy learning develops as they learn to make meaning through interactions with others. These assertions are premised on the understanding that childhood literacy serves various social purposes and that these literacies are learned through participating in social contexts. In this position paper, we seek to reframe current, widely accepted understandings and definitions of literacy. We draw upon mātauranga Māori (Māori knowledge/wisdom) concepts to illustrate Māori philosophical views about the nature of knowledge production. These concepts clearly delineate the link between knowledge, literacies, and power, a link often actively overlooked by western framing of literacy. We use a Māori whakataukī (proverbial saying) to re-conceptualise current understandings of literacy, positing varied literacies and literacy practices. Within this conceptual framework Māori children are re-positioned as maurea - treasures of the highest order, born of and with mana, an integral part of generations of whakapapa (genealogy), and an essential element in an intricate web linking all things (human and non-human). This paper proposes that children are inherently and inherited-ly literate; they are born literate-inheritors of multiple and cumulative genealogies of multimodal communication and knowledge sharing.
{"title":"Tiritiria: Understanding Māori children as inherently and inherited-ly literate-Towards a conceptual position.","authors":"Maia Hetaraka, Selena Meiklejohn-Whiu, Melinda Webber, Rebecca Jesson","doi":"10.1007/s40841-023-00282-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40841-023-00282-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many theories support the idea that children's literacy learning develops as they learn to make meaning through interactions with others. These assertions are premised on the understanding that childhood literacy serves various social purposes and that these literacies are learned through participating in social contexts. In this position paper, we seek to reframe current, widely accepted understandings and definitions of literacy. We draw upon mātauranga Māori (Māori knowledge/wisdom) concepts to illustrate Māori philosophical views about the nature of knowledge production. These concepts clearly delineate the link between knowledge, literacies, and power, a link often actively overlooked by western framing of literacy. We use a Māori whakataukī (proverbial saying) to re-conceptualise current understandings of literacy, positing varied literacies and literacy practices. Within this conceptual framework Māori children are re-positioned as maurea - treasures of the highest order, born of and with mana, an integral part of generations of whakapapa (genealogy), and an essential element in an intricate web linking all things (human and non-human). This paper proposes that children are inherently and inherited-ly literate; they are born literate-inheritors of multiple and cumulative genealogies of multimodal communication and knowledge sharing.</p>","PeriodicalId":44884,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10259197/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9626552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01Epub Date: 2023-03-27DOI: 10.1007/s40841-023-00280-9
Jo Fletcher, John Everatt, Yogeetha Devi Bala Subramaniam, Ting Ma
In New Zealand, the architectural design of schools and the spaces where children learn are being innovated to allow for more opportunities for teachers and students to work collaboratively. However, there is a dearth of research that has investigated both teachers' and students' perceptions of the learning spaces. Little attention has been paid to Asian students, who may perceive learning quite differently from their English-only speaking counterparts. This article compares the perceptions of teachers with students, highlighting the group from Asian backgrounds in both innovative with traditional learning spaces. Fourteen Year 5 and 6 primary teachers from traditional and innovative learning environments were interviewed. Additionally, a questionnaire was given to 150 Year 5 and 6 students. The study found that although many of the teachers perceived challenges with noise and distraction in innovative learning environments, this was not as evident in the responses from the students, particularly the Asian students.
{"title":"Perceptions About Innovative and Traditional Learning Spaces: Teachers and Students in New Zealand Primary Schools.","authors":"Jo Fletcher, John Everatt, Yogeetha Devi Bala Subramaniam, Ting Ma","doi":"10.1007/s40841-023-00280-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40841-023-00280-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In New Zealand, the architectural design of schools and the spaces where children learn are being innovated to allow for more opportunities for teachers and students to work collaboratively. However, there is a dearth of research that has investigated both teachers' and students' perceptions of the learning spaces. Little attention has been paid to Asian students, who may perceive learning quite differently from their English-only speaking counterparts. This article compares the perceptions of teachers with students, highlighting the group from Asian backgrounds in both innovative with traditional learning spaces. Fourteen Year 5 and 6 primary teachers from traditional and innovative learning environments were interviewed. Additionally, a questionnaire was given to 150 Year 5 and 6 students. The study found that although many of the teachers perceived challenges with noise and distraction in innovative learning environments, this was not as evident in the responses from the students, particularly the Asian students.</p>","PeriodicalId":44884,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042107/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9909726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01Epub Date: 2023-04-06DOI: 10.1007/s40841-023-00283-6
Sarah-Kay Coulter
There is a conflict between the claims of Māori sovereignty and the imposition of State legislation on Māori children. This conflict of interest has been given very little consideration in the public sphere. This research-informed article speculates that despite legislation ensuring that education attendance is fixed as a legal obligation for all Primary and Secondary aged children, there is urgency to address if conceivably this is a deeply flawed assumption as it contradicts notions of tribal sovereignty. Cautiously, this article does not romanticise past positioning of Māori peoples, nor makes claims to indigenous righteousness, rather moves to suggest that State-led education belongs part of positive outcomes for Māori, however there must be negotiation to the terms and expectations for education attendance. This paper is a catalyst for future orientated discussion aiming to broaden what education can move to become in Aotearoa, New Zealand.
{"title":"Can Māori Negotiate School Attendance in State-Led Education in Aotearoa, New Zealand?","authors":"Sarah-Kay Coulter","doi":"10.1007/s40841-023-00283-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40841-023-00283-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a conflict between the claims of Māori sovereignty and the imposition of State legislation on Māori children. This conflict of interest has been given very little consideration in the public sphere. This research-informed article speculates that despite legislation ensuring that education attendance is fixed as a legal obligation for all Primary and Secondary aged children, there is urgency to address if conceivably this is a deeply flawed assumption as it contradicts notions of tribal sovereignty. Cautiously, this article does not romanticise past positioning of Māori peoples, nor makes claims to indigenous righteousness, rather moves to suggest that State-led education belongs part of positive outcomes for Māori, however there must be negotiation to the terms and expectations for education attendance. This paper is a catalyst for future orientated discussion aiming to broaden what education can move to become in Aotearoa, New Zealand.</p>","PeriodicalId":44884,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10079147/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9909722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-06DOI: 10.1007/s40841-022-00271-2
Nina Hood, T. Hughson
{"title":"Literacy Achievement in Aotearoa New Zealand: What is the Evidence?","authors":"Nina Hood, T. Hughson","doi":"10.1007/s40841-022-00271-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-022-00271-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44884,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45497845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}