首页 > 最新文献

Minimally Invasive Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome Managed with Laparoscopic Duodenojejunostomy. 腹腔镜十二指肠空肠吻合术治疗肠系膜上动脉综合征。
IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-08-03 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4607440
Ahmed Sabry, Ramy Shaalan, Carl Kahlin, Ahmed Elhoofy

Background: Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) syndrome is a rare disorder that may be managed surgically if conservative management fails. Different surgical techniques have been described, division of the ligament of Treitz, gastrojejunostomy, and duodenojejunostomy. The aim of this case series is to show that laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy is a safe and technically feasible management for superior mesenteric artery syndrome.

Methods: In this case series, we retrospectively identified all patients who underwent laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy for SMA syndrome in our tertiary university center between December 2016 and July 2019. Data collected included demographics, presenting symptoms, comorbidities, pre and postoperative body mass index (BMI), operative approach, operative blood loss, operative duration, clinical and radiological results, in hospital/30-day complications, mortality, and postoperative follow-up outcomes.

Results: We identified eleven patients, 10 females and 1 male, with a median age 23 years (range 17-43 years). All patients had refractory symptoms after a minimum of two months of conservative management and subsequently underwent laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy. There were no intraoperative complications and no in-hospital or 30-day postoperative mortality or complications were identified. Follow-up data showed complete resolution in 73% of patients (n = 8) and only one patient with no improvement postoperatively. Results also showed a median BMI increase of 2 kg/m2 (range 1-9 kg/m2) at a median follow-up of 16 months (range 4-48 months).

Conclusion: Laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy is a safe treatment option for SMA syndrome and should be considered when patients do not respond to conservative management.

背景:肠系膜上动脉(SMA)综合征是一种罕见的疾病,如果保守治疗失败,可以手术治疗。不同的手术技术已被描述,韧带的划分,胃空肠吻合术,和十二指肠空肠吻合术。本病例系列的目的是表明腹腔镜十二指肠空肠吻合术是一种安全且技术上可行的治疗肠系膜上动脉综合征的方法。方法:在本病例系列中,我们回顾性分析了2016年12月至2019年7月在我们的第三大学中心接受腹腔镜十二指肠空肠造口术治疗SMA综合征的所有患者。收集的数据包括人口统计学、症状、合并症、术前和术后体重指数(BMI)、手术入路、手术出血量、手术持续时间、临床和放射学结果、住院/30天并发症、死亡率和术后随访结果。结果:我们确定了11例患者,10例女性,1例男性,中位年龄23岁(范围17-43岁)。所有患者在保守治疗至少两个月后出现难治性症状,随后行腹腔镜十二指肠空肠吻合术。无术中并发症,无院内或术后30天死亡率或并发症。随访数据显示73%的患者(n = 8)完全缓解,只有1例患者术后无改善。结果还显示,在中位随访16个月(范围4-48个月)时,BMI中位数增加了2 kg/m2(范围1-9 kg/m2)。结论:腹腔镜十二指肠空肠吻合术是SMA综合征的一种安全的治疗选择,当患者对保守治疗无反应时应予以考虑。
{"title":"Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome Managed with Laparoscopic Duodenojejunostomy.","authors":"Ahmed Sabry,&nbsp;Ramy Shaalan,&nbsp;Carl Kahlin,&nbsp;Ahmed Elhoofy","doi":"10.1155/2022/4607440","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4607440","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) syndrome is a rare disorder that may be managed surgically if conservative management fails. Different surgical techniques have been described, division of the ligament of Treitz, gastrojejunostomy, and duodenojejunostomy. The aim of this case series is to show that laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy is a safe and technically feasible management for superior mesenteric artery syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this case series, we retrospectively identified all patients who underwent laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy for SMA syndrome in our tertiary university center between December 2016 and July 2019. Data collected included demographics, presenting symptoms, comorbidities, pre and postoperative body mass index (BMI), operative approach, operative blood loss, operative duration, clinical and radiological results, in hospital/30-day complications, mortality, and postoperative follow-up outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified eleven patients, 10 females and 1 male, with a median age 23 years (range 17-43 years). All patients had refractory symptoms after a minimum of two months of conservative management and subsequently underwent laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy. There were no intraoperative complications and no in-hospital or 30-day postoperative mortality or complications were identified. Follow-up data showed complete resolution in 73% of patients (<i>n</i> = 8) and only one patient with no improvement postoperatively. Results also showed a median BMI increase of 2 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (range 1-9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) at a median follow-up of 16 months (range 4-48 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy is a safe treatment option for SMA syndrome and should be considered when patients do not respond to conservative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365593/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40697366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
A Study of the Safety and Morbidity Profile of Closed versus Open Technique of Laparoscopic Primary Peritoneal Access Port in Patients Undergoing Routine Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Northeastern India. 在印度东北部一家三级医院进行常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者中,封闭与开放腹腔镜初级腹膜通路技术的安全性和发病率的研究。
IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-12 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1017551
A Baruah, N Topno, S Ghosh, N Naku, R Hajong, D Tongper, D Khongwar, P Baruah, N Chishi, S Sutradhar

Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard operation for gallstone disease. Primary port placement into the abdomen is a blind procedure and is challenging with chances of unforeseen complications. The complication rate has remained the same during the past 25 years. Both closed/Veress and open/Hasson's techniques are commonly employed and have their typical indications for use.

Materials and methods: This prospective study was carried out in the Department of General Surgery, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences (NEIGRIHMS), Shillong, from January 2014 to January 2016, with the aim to compare the safety profile of closed/Veress and open/Hasson's methods of access to the abdomen during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The study had 400 eligible cases undergoing LC who were randomly allotted into 2 groups with 200 cases each: group A: closed/Veress needle method and group B: open/Hasson's method.

Results: Closed/Veress and open/Hasson's method of establishing pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is equally safe in terms of major complications. The closed/Veress method gives faster access to the abdomen as compared to the open method (5.62 ± 2.23 minutes and 7.18 ± 2.52 minutes, respectively, p value <0.0001). The open/Hasson's method is associated with more primary port site complications (9/200 vs. 0/200, p value 0.0036) and troublesome intraoperative gas leaks (39/200 vs. 2/200, p value <0.0001). The open technique for primary peritoneal access port for laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not impart any additional benefits in terms of safety and morbidity profile in patients undergoing LC.

Conclusion: The closed/Veress method of establishing pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is equally safe in terms of major complications and gives quicker access to the abdomen as compared to the open method.

腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)是胆结石疾病的金标准手术。初级端口放置到腹部是一个盲目的过程,具有不可预见的并发症的机会的挑战。在过去的25年中,并发症发生率保持不变。封闭/Veress和开放/Hasson技术都是常用的,并且有其典型的使用适应症。材料与方法:本前瞻性研究于2014年1月至2016年1月在西隆东北英迪拉甘地地区卫生与医学科学研究所(NEIGRIHMS)普外科进行,目的是比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中封闭/Veress和开放/Hasson入腹方法的安全性。本研究有400例符合条件的LC患者,随机分为2组,每组200例:A组:闭式/Veress针法,B组:开式/Hasson法。结果:腹腔镜胆囊切除术中闭合/Veress法与开放/Hasson法建立气腹在主要并发症方面同样安全。与开放式方法相比,封闭式/Veress方法进入腹部的时间更快(分别为5.62±2.23分钟和7.18±2.52分钟,p值p值为0.0036),术中气体泄漏更麻烦(39/200 vs. 2/200, p值)。结论:腹腔镜胆囊切除术中采用封闭式/Veress方法建立气腹在主要并发症方面同样安全,与开放式方法相比,进入腹部的时间更快。
{"title":"A Study of the Safety and Morbidity Profile of Closed versus Open Technique of Laparoscopic Primary Peritoneal Access Port in Patients Undergoing Routine Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Northeastern India.","authors":"A Baruah,&nbsp;N Topno,&nbsp;S Ghosh,&nbsp;N Naku,&nbsp;R Hajong,&nbsp;D Tongper,&nbsp;D Khongwar,&nbsp;P Baruah,&nbsp;N Chishi,&nbsp;S Sutradhar","doi":"10.1155/2022/1017551","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1017551","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard operation for gallstone disease. Primary port placement into the abdomen is a blind procedure and is challenging with chances of unforeseen complications. The complication rate has remained the same during the past 25 years. Both closed/Veress and open/Hasson's techniques are commonly employed and have their typical indications for use.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective study was carried out in the Department of General Surgery, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences (NEIGRIHMS), Shillong, from January 2014 to January 2016, with the aim to compare the safety profile of closed/Veress and open/Hasson's methods of access to the abdomen during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The study had 400 eligible cases undergoing LC who were randomly allotted into 2 groups with 200 cases each: group A: closed/Veress needle method and group B: open/Hasson's method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Closed/Veress and open/Hasson's method of establishing pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is equally safe in terms of major complications. The closed/Veress method gives faster access to the abdomen as compared to the open method (5.62 ± 2.23 minutes and 7.18 ± 2.52 minutes, respectively, <i>p</i> value <0.0001). The open/Hasson's method is associated with more primary port site complications (9/200 vs. 0/200, <i>p</i> value 0.0036) and troublesome intraoperative gas leaks (39/200 vs. 2/200, <i>p</i> value <0.0001). The open technique for primary peritoneal access port for laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not impart any additional benefits in terms of safety and morbidity profile in patients undergoing LC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The closed/Veress method of establishing pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is equally safe in terms of major complications and gives quicker access to the abdomen as compared to the open method.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9296326/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40527962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Post-Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Donor Nephrectomy Ipsilateral Testicular Pain, Does Operative Technique Matter? A Single Center Experience and Review of Literature. 腹腔镜单点供肾切除术后同侧睾丸疼痛,手术技术重要吗?单一中心经验与文献回顾。
IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-03-23 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3292048
Hany M El Hennawy, Abdullah S Al Faifi, Eisa Al Atta, Omar Safar, Saad Thamer, Weam El Nazer, Ahmed I Kamal, Abdelaziz A Abdelaziz, Shaher A Kawasmeh, Naveed Mirza, Mohammad F Zaitoun, Khalid Al-Alsheikh, Osama Shalkamy, Ahmed Mahedy

Aim: To assess incidence and characteristics of post-laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy (LESS DN) testicular pain.

Materials and methods: A prospective comparative study of all male donors post-left LESS DN (group A) vs. postopen nephrectomies (group B) was performed at our center. Patients' demographics, perioperative data, and postoperative consultation reports were reviewed. Testicular pain, swelling, numbness, urinary symptoms, and sexual dysfunction were evaluated. Patients with a history of scrotal pathology or surgical procedure were excluded. Pain and tenderness were scored on a standard 10-point scale.

Results: From September 2017 to December 2020, 85 and 35 male patients of groups A and B met the evaluation criteria. Ipsilateral testicular pain developed in 11 patients (15.3%) and 2 patients (9.5%) in groups A and B, respectively. In most instances, the pain was mild to moderate in severity, started after 6 ± 2.1 and 4 ± 1.1 days postoperatively in groups A and B, respectively. Six patients in group A were evaluated with transscrotal ultrasonography that showed no abnormalities. All patients in both groups responded well to medical treatment.

Conclusions: Post-LESS DN ipsilateral testicular pain is usually mild and self-limited. Preoperative patient education and discussion of the possibility of development of testicular pain and its management should be an integral component of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy informed consent.

目的:探讨腹腔镜单部位供肾切除术(LESS DN)后睾丸疼痛的发生率及特点。材料和方法:在我们的中心对所有男性供体进行左侧LESS DN (A组)和开放式肾切除术(B组)的前瞻性比较研究。回顾了患者的人口统计、围手术期数据和术后咨询报告。评估睾丸疼痛、肿胀、麻木、泌尿系统症状和性功能障碍。排除有阴囊病理史或手术史的患者。疼痛和压痛的评分标准为10分。结果:2017年9月至2020年12月,A组和B组男性患者分别有85例和35例符合评价标准。A组11例(15.3%),B组2例(9.5%)发生同侧睾丸疼痛。A组和B组大多在术后6±2.1天和4±1.1天开始出现轻至中度疼痛。A组6例经阴囊超声检查未见异常。两组患者均对药物治疗反应良好。结论:less DN后同侧睾丸疼痛通常是轻度和自限性的。术前患者教育和讨论睾丸疼痛发展的可能性及其管理应是腹腔镜肾切除术知情同意的一个组成部分。
{"title":"Post-Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Donor Nephrectomy Ipsilateral Testicular Pain, Does Operative Technique Matter? A Single Center Experience and Review of Literature.","authors":"Hany M El Hennawy,&nbsp;Abdullah S Al Faifi,&nbsp;Eisa Al Atta,&nbsp;Omar Safar,&nbsp;Saad Thamer,&nbsp;Weam El Nazer,&nbsp;Ahmed I Kamal,&nbsp;Abdelaziz A Abdelaziz,&nbsp;Shaher A Kawasmeh,&nbsp;Naveed Mirza,&nbsp;Mohammad F Zaitoun,&nbsp;Khalid Al-Alsheikh,&nbsp;Osama Shalkamy,&nbsp;Ahmed Mahedy","doi":"10.1155/2022/3292048","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3292048","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess incidence and characteristics of post-laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy (LESS DN) testicular pain.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective comparative study of all male donors post-left LESS DN (group A) vs. postopen nephrectomies (group B) was performed at our center. Patients' demographics, perioperative data, and postoperative consultation reports were reviewed. Testicular pain, swelling, numbness, urinary symptoms, and sexual dysfunction were evaluated. Patients with a history of scrotal pathology or surgical procedure were excluded. Pain and tenderness were scored on a standard 10-point scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From September 2017 to December 2020, 85 and 35 male patients of groups A and B met the evaluation criteria. Ipsilateral testicular pain developed in 11 patients (15.3%) and 2 patients (9.5%) in groups A and B, respectively. In most instances, the pain was mild to moderate in severity, started after 6 ± 2.1 and 4 ± 1.1 days postoperatively in groups A and B, respectively. Six patients in group A were evaluated with transscrotal ultrasonography that showed no abnormalities. All patients in both groups responded well to medical treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-LESS DN ipsilateral testicular pain is usually mild and self-limited. Preoperative patient education and discussion of the possibility of development of testicular pain and its management should be an integral component of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy informed consent.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9200591/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40041919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Single Incision Cholecystectomies for Acute Cholecystitis: A Single Surgeon Series from the Caribbean 急性胆囊炎单切口胆囊切除术:来自加勒比地区的单一外科医生系列
IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-02-16 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6781544
S. Cawich, S. Mohanty, O. Felix, G. Dapri
Introduction Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is accepted as a safe alternative to conventional multiport laparoscopic (MPL) cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease. Since many surgeons carefully select patients without inflammation, there are limited data on SILS for acute cholecystitis. We report a single surgeon experience with SILS cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis. Materials and Methods After securing ethical approval, we performed an audit of all SILS cholecystectomies for acute cholecystitis by a single surgeon from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2019. The following data were extracted: patient demographics, intraoperative details, surgical techniques, specialized equipment utilized, conversions (additional port placement), morbidity, and mortality. Data were analyzed using SPSS 12.0. Results SILS cholecystectomy was performed in 25 females at a mean age of 35 ± 4.1 (SD) years and a mean BMI of 31.9 ± 3.8 (SD) using a direct fascial puncture technique without access platforms. The operations were completed in 83 ± 29.4 minutes (mean ± SD) with an estimated blood loss of 76.9 ± 105 (mean + SD). Three (12%) patients required additional 5 mm port placement (conversions), but no open operations were performed. The patients were hospitalized for 1.96 ± 0.9 days (mean ± SD). There were 2 complications: postoperative superficial SSI (grade I) and a diaphragmatic laceration (grade III). No bile duct injuries were reported. There were 9 patients with complicated acute cholecystitis, and this sub-group had longer mean operating times (109.2 ± 27.3 minutes) and mean postoperative hospital stay (1.3 ± 0.87 days). Conclusion The SILS technique is a feasible and safe approach to perform cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. We advocate a low threshold to place additional ports to assist with difficult dissections for patient safety.
引言单切口腹腔镜手术(SILS)是治疗良性胆囊疾病的一种安全的替代传统多端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(MPL)的方法。由于许多外科医生仔细选择没有炎症的患者,因此关于急性胆囊炎SILS的数据有限。我们报告了一位外科医生对急性胆囊炎患者进行SILS胆囊切除术的经验。材料和方法在获得伦理批准后,我们对2009年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间由一名外科医生进行的所有急性胆囊炎SILS胆囊切除术进行了审计。提取了以下数据:患者人口统计、术中细节、手术技术、使用的专用设备、转换(额外的端口放置)、发病率和死亡率。使用SPSS 12.0对数据进行分析。结果25例女性行SILS胆囊切除术,平均年龄35岁 ± 4.1(SD)年,平均BMI为31.9 ± 3.8(SD),使用没有进入平台的直接筋膜穿刺技术。手术于83年完成 ± 29.4分钟(平均 ± SD),估计失血量为76.9 ± 105(平均值 + SD)。三名(12%)患者需要额外5名 mm端口放置(转换),但未执行打开操作。患者住院1.96 ± 0.9天(平均值 ± SD)。有2种并发症:术后浅表SSI(I级)和膈撕裂伤(III级)。没有胆管损伤的报告。9例患者并发急性胆囊炎,该亚组平均手术时间较长(109.2 ± 27.3分钟)和术后平均住院时间(1.3 ± 0.87天)。结论SILS技术是一种可行、安全的急性胆囊炎胆囊切除术。为了患者安全,我们提倡设置低阈值的额外端口,以协助进行困难的解剖。
{"title":"Single Incision Cholecystectomies for Acute Cholecystitis: A Single Surgeon Series from the Caribbean","authors":"S. Cawich, S. Mohanty, O. Felix, G. Dapri","doi":"10.1155/2022/6781544","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6781544","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is accepted as a safe alternative to conventional multiport laparoscopic (MPL) cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease. Since many surgeons carefully select patients without inflammation, there are limited data on SILS for acute cholecystitis. We report a single surgeon experience with SILS cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis. Materials and Methods After securing ethical approval, we performed an audit of all SILS cholecystectomies for acute cholecystitis by a single surgeon from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2019. The following data were extracted: patient demographics, intraoperative details, surgical techniques, specialized equipment utilized, conversions (additional port placement), morbidity, and mortality. Data were analyzed using SPSS 12.0. Results SILS cholecystectomy was performed in 25 females at a mean age of 35 ± 4.1 (SD) years and a mean BMI of 31.9 ± 3.8 (SD) using a direct fascial puncture technique without access platforms. The operations were completed in 83 ± 29.4 minutes (mean ± SD) with an estimated blood loss of 76.9 ± 105 (mean + SD). Three (12%) patients required additional 5 mm port placement (conversions), but no open operations were performed. The patients were hospitalized for 1.96 ± 0.9 days (mean ± SD). There were 2 complications: postoperative superficial SSI (grade I) and a diaphragmatic laceration (grade III). No bile duct injuries were reported. There were 9 patients with complicated acute cholecystitis, and this sub-group had longer mean operating times (109.2 ± 27.3 minutes) and mean postoperative hospital stay (1.3 ± 0.87 days). Conclusion The SILS technique is a feasible and safe approach to perform cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. We advocate a low threshold to place additional ports to assist with difficult dissections for patient safety.","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47302222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Application of Design Structure Matrix to Simulate Surgical Procedures and Predict Surgery Duration. 设计结构矩阵在外科手术过程模拟及手术时间预测中的应用。
IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-06 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6340754
Zhaoxuan Li, Derrick Tate, Thomas McGill, John Griswold, Ming-Chien Chyu

Background: The complexities of surgery require an efficient and explicit method to evaluate and standardize surgical procedures. A reliable surgical evaluation tool will be able to serve various purposes such as development of surgery training programs and improvement of surgical skills.

Objectives: (a) To develop a modeling framework based on integration of dexterity analysis and design structure matrix (DSM), to be generally applicable to predict total duration of a surgical procedure, and (b) to validate the model by comparing its results with laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery protocol.

Method: A modeling framework is developed through DSM, a tool used in engineering design, systems engineering and management, to hierarchically decompose and describe relationships among individual surgical activities. Individual decomposed activities are assumed to have uncertain parameters so that a rework probability is introduced. The simulation produces a distribution of the duration of the modeled procedure. A statistical approach is then taken to evaluate surgery duration through integrated numerical parameters. The modeling framework is applied for the first time to analyze a surgery; laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a common surgical procedure, is selected for the analysis.

Results: The present simulation model is validated by comparing its results of predicted surgery duration with the standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy protocols from the Atlas of Minimally Invasive Surgery with 2.5% error and that from the Atlas of Pediatric Laparoscopy and Thoracoscopy with 4% error.

Conclusion: The present model, developed based on dexterity analysis and DSM, demonstrates a validated capability of predicting laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery duration. Future studies will explore its potential applications to other surgery procedures and in improving surgeons' performance and training novices.

背景:外科手术的复杂性需要一种有效和明确的方法来评估和规范外科手术。一个可靠的手术评估工具将能够服务于各种目的,如制定手术培训计划和提高手术技能。目的:(a)建立一个基于灵巧性分析与设计结构矩阵(DSM)相结合的建模框架,使其普遍适用于预测手术总时间;(b)通过将模型结果与腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术方案进行比较,对模型进行验证。方法:通过工程设计、系统工程和管理中常用的工具DSM,建立一个建模框架,对单个手术活动之间的关系进行分层分解和描述。假定单个分解的活动具有不确定的参数,从而引入了返工概率。仿真生成建模过程持续时间的分布。然后采用统计方法通过综合数值参数来评估手术时间。该建模框架首次应用于手术分析;腹腔镜胆囊切除术,一种常见的外科手术,被选择进行分析。结果:通过将模拟模型的手术时间预测结果与《微创外科图集》中的标准腹腔镜胆囊切除术方案(误差为2.5%)和《儿科腹腔镜胸腔镜图集》中的手术时间预测结果(误差为4%)进行比较,验证了该模型的有效性。结论:本模型基于灵巧性分析和DSM开发,证明了预测腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术时间的有效能力。未来的研究将探索其在其他外科手术、提高外科医生的表现和培训新手方面的潜在应用。
{"title":"Application of Design Structure Matrix to Simulate Surgical Procedures and Predict Surgery Duration.","authors":"Zhaoxuan Li,&nbsp;Derrick Tate,&nbsp;Thomas McGill,&nbsp;John Griswold,&nbsp;Ming-Chien Chyu","doi":"10.1155/2021/6340754","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6340754","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The complexities of surgery require an efficient and explicit method to evaluate and standardize surgical procedures. A reliable surgical evaluation tool will be able to serve various purposes such as development of surgery training programs and improvement of surgical skills.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(a) To develop a modeling framework based on integration of dexterity analysis and design structure matrix (DSM), to be generally applicable to predict total duration of a surgical procedure, and (b) to validate the model by comparing its results with laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery protocol.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A modeling framework is developed through DSM, a tool used in engineering design, systems engineering and management, to hierarchically decompose and describe relationships among individual surgical activities. Individual decomposed activities are assumed to have uncertain parameters so that a rework probability is introduced. The simulation produces a distribution of the duration of the modeled procedure. A statistical approach is then taken to evaluate surgery duration through integrated numerical parameters. The modeling framework is applied for the first time to analyze a surgery; laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a common surgical procedure, is selected for the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The present simulation model is validated by comparing its results of predicted surgery duration with the standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy protocols from the <i>Atlas of Minimally Invasive Surgery</i> with 2.5% error and that from the <i>Atlas of Pediatric Laparoscopy and Thoracoscopy</i> with 4% error.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present model, developed based on dexterity analysis and DSM, demonstrates a validated capability of predicting laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery duration. Future studies will explore its potential applications to other surgery procedures and in improving surgeons' performance and training novices.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8668307/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39729397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Limitation of Endoscopic Surgery Using the Full Endoscopic Discectomy System for the Treatment of Destructive Stage Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis: A Case Series. 内窥镜手术使用全内窥镜椎间盘切除术系统治疗破坏期化脓性脊柱炎的局限性:一个病例系列。
IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-11-25 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5582849
Tomoyuki Setoue, Jun-Ichiro Nakamura, Jun Hara

Introduction: Conservative therapy, including appropriate antibiotics and bracing, is usually adequate for most patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis. If conservative treatment fails, surgical intervention is needed. However, major spinal surgery comprising anterior debridement and accompanying bone grafting with or without additional instrumentation is often related to undesired postoperative complications. In recent years, with minimally invasive surgery, the diagnostic and therapeutic value of endoscopic lavage and drainage has been proven. This study reports a case series of patients who required open revision surgery after treatment with endoscopic surgery using the full endoscopic discectomy system (FED), indicating the surgical limitations of endoscopic surgery for pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

Methods: We retrospectively investigated the medical records of 4 patients who underwent open debridement and anterior reconstruction with posterior instrumentation following endoscopic surgery for their advanced lumbar infectious spondylitis. They had been receiving conservative treatment with antibiotics for 12-15 days. They also had various comorbidities, including kidney disease, heart failure, and diabetes. Numerical rating scale pain response, perioperative imaging studies, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were determined, and causative bacteria were identified. Primarily, the bone destruction stage was classified using computed tomography with reference to Griffiths' scheme.

Results: All patients had severe back pain before surgery with no relief of the pain after FED. Increased pain, including radicular pain after FED, was noted in one case. Causative pathogens from biopsy specimens were identified in 3 (75%) of the 4 cases. In preoperative radiological evaluation, all cases were classified as destructive stage in Griffiths' scheme. The CRP levels of all the patients decreased slightly after endoscopic surgery. Relapse of spinal infection after revision surgery was not noted in any patient during the follow-up period.

Conclusion: The surgical treatment of destructive-stage spondylitis with FED alone can increase low back pain due to aggressive debridement.

保守治疗,包括适当的抗生素和支具,对于大多数化脓性脊柱炎患者通常是足够的。如果保守治疗失败,则需要手术干预。然而,大型脊柱手术包括前路清创和伴随植骨,有或没有额外的内固定,通常与不希望的术后并发症有关。近年来,随着微创手术的开展,内镜灌洗引流的诊断和治疗价值得到了证实。本研究报告了一系列病例,患者在使用全内窥镜椎间盘切除术系统(FED)进行内窥镜手术治疗后需要开放翻修手术,这表明内窥镜手术治疗化脓性脊柱炎的手术局限性。方法:我们回顾性分析了4例晚期腰椎感染性脊柱炎患者在内窥镜手术后接受开放清创和前路重建及后路内固定的医疗记录。他们已经接受了12-15天的抗生素保守治疗。他们也有各种合并症,包括肾脏疾病、心力衰竭和糖尿病。测量疼痛反应、围手术期影像学检查和c反应蛋白(CRP)水平,并鉴定致病菌。首先,参考Griffiths方案,使用计算机断层扫描对骨破坏阶段进行分类。结果:所有患者术前均有严重的背部疼痛,术后疼痛未得到缓解。1例患者术后疼痛加重,包括神经根疼痛。4例中有3例(75%)从活检标本中检出致病菌。术前影像学评价均按照Griffiths方案划分为破坏期。所有患者在内镜手术后CRP水平均略有下降。在随访期间,所有患者均未发现翻修手术后脊柱感染复发。结论:手术治疗破坏期脊柱炎时,单纯使用联苯醚可增加因积极清创引起的腰痛。
{"title":"The Limitation of Endoscopic Surgery Using the Full Endoscopic Discectomy System for the Treatment of Destructive Stage Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis: A Case Series.","authors":"Tomoyuki Setoue,&nbsp;Jun-Ichiro Nakamura,&nbsp;Jun Hara","doi":"10.1155/2021/5582849","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5582849","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Conservative therapy, including appropriate antibiotics and bracing, is usually adequate for most patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis. If conservative treatment fails, surgical intervention is needed. However, major spinal surgery comprising anterior debridement and accompanying bone grafting with or without additional instrumentation is often related to undesired postoperative complications. In recent years, with minimally invasive surgery, the diagnostic and therapeutic value of endoscopic lavage and drainage has been proven. This study reports a case series of patients who required open revision surgery after treatment with endoscopic surgery using the full endoscopic discectomy system (FED), indicating the surgical limitations of endoscopic surgery for pyogenic spondylodiscitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively investigated the medical records of 4 patients who underwent open debridement and anterior reconstruction with posterior instrumentation following endoscopic surgery for their advanced lumbar infectious spondylitis. They had been receiving conservative treatment with antibiotics for 12-15 days. They also had various comorbidities, including kidney disease, heart failure, and diabetes. Numerical rating scale pain response, perioperative imaging studies, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were determined, and causative bacteria were identified. Primarily, the bone destruction stage was classified using computed tomography with reference to Griffiths' scheme.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients had severe back pain before surgery with no relief of the pain after FED. Increased pain, including radicular pain after FED, was noted in one case. Causative pathogens from biopsy specimens were identified in 3 (75%) of the 4 cases. In preoperative radiological evaluation, all cases were classified as destructive stage in Griffiths' scheme. The CRP levels of all the patients decreased slightly after endoscopic surgery. Relapse of spinal infection after revision surgery was not noted in any patient during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The surgical treatment of destructive-stage spondylitis with FED alone can increase low back pain due to aggressive debridement.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8639270/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39695821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Quality of YouTube Videos on Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Patient Education. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术YouTube视频质量对患者教育的影响。
IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-09-15 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1155/2021/2462832
Joseph N Hewitt, Joshua G Kovoor, Christopher D Ovenden, Gayatri P Asokan

Background: Surgical patients frequently seek information from digital sources, particularly before common operations such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). YouTube provides a large amount of free educational content; however, it lacks regulation or peer review. To inform patient education, we evaluated the quality of YouTube videos on LC.

Methods: We searched YouTube with the phrase "laparoscopic cholecystectomy." Two authors independently rated quality of the first 50 videos retrieved using the JAMA, Health on the Net (HON), and DISCERN scoring systems. Data collected for each video included total views, time since upload, video length, total comments, and percentage positivity (proportion of likes relative to total likes plus dislikes). Interobserver reliability was assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Association between quality and video characteristics was tested.

Results: Mean video quality scores were poor, scoring 1.9/4 for JAMA, 2.0/5.0 for DISCERN, and 4.9/8.0 for HON. There was good interobserver reliability with an ICC of 0.78, 0.81, and 0.74, respectively. Median number of views was 21,789 (IQR 3000-61,690). Videos were mostly published by private corporations. No video characteristic demonstrated significant association with video quality.

Conclusion: YouTube videos for LC are of low quality and insufficient for patient education. Treating surgeons should advise of the website's limitations and direct patients to trusted sources of information.

背景:外科患者经常从数字来源寻求信息,特别是在常见手术前,如腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)。YouTube提供了大量免费的教育内容;然而,它缺乏监管或同行评审。为了告知患者教育,我们评估了关于LC的YouTube视频的质量。方法:我们在YouTube上搜索“腹腔镜胆囊切除术”。两位作者分别使用JAMA、网上健康(HON)和DISCERN评分系统对检索到的前50个视频进行了质量评级。每个视频收集的数据包括总浏览量、上传后的时间、视频长度、总评论和积极性百分比(喜欢与总喜欢和不喜欢的比例)。使用类内相关系数(ICC)评估观察者间的信度。测试了质量与视频特性之间的关系。结果:平均视频质量评分较差,JAMA评分为1.9/4,DISCERN评分为2.0/5.0,hon评分为4.9/8.0。观察者间信度良好,ICC分别为0.78、0.81和0.74。观看人数中位数为21,789 (IQR 3000-61,690)。录像带大多由私营公司出版。没有视频特征显示与视频质量有显著关联。结论:YouTube视频质量较差,对患者教育不足。治疗外科医生应告知该网站的局限性,并将患者引导至可信赖的信息来源。
{"title":"Quality of YouTube Videos on Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Patient Education.","authors":"Joseph N Hewitt,&nbsp;Joshua G Kovoor,&nbsp;Christopher D Ovenden,&nbsp;Gayatri P Asokan","doi":"10.1155/2021/2462832","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2462832","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical patients frequently seek information from digital sources, particularly before common operations such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). YouTube provides a large amount of free educational content; however, it lacks regulation or peer review. To inform patient education, we evaluated the quality of YouTube videos on LC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched YouTube with the phrase \"laparoscopic cholecystectomy.\" Two authors independently rated quality of the first 50 videos retrieved using the JAMA, Health on the Net (HON), and DISCERN scoring systems. Data collected for each video included total views, time since upload, video length, total comments, and percentage positivity (proportion of likes relative to total likes plus dislikes). Interobserver reliability was assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Association between quality and video characteristics was tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean video quality scores were poor, scoring 1.9/4 for JAMA, 2.0/5.0 for DISCERN, and 4.9/8.0 for HON. There was good interobserver reliability with an ICC of 0.78, 0.81, and 0.74, respectively. Median number of views was 21,789 (IQR 3000-61,690). Videos were mostly published by private corporations. No video characteristic demonstrated significant association with video quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>YouTube videos for LC are of low quality and insufficient for patient education. Treating surgeons should advise of the website's limitations and direct patients to trusted sources of information.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8460373/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39452546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
The "Dark Side" of Pneumoperitoneum and Laparoscopy. 气腹和腹腔镜的“阴暗面”。
IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-05-19 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5564745
Giuseppina Rosaria Umano, Giulia Delehaye, Carmine Noviello, Alfonso Papparella

Laparoscopic surgery has been one of the most common procedures for abdominal surgery at pediatric age during the last few decades as it has several advantages compared to laparotomy, such as shorter hospital stays, less pain, and better cosmetic results. However, it is associated with both local and systemic modifications. Recent evidence demonstrated that carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum might be modulated in terms of pressure, duration, temperature, and humidity to mitigate and modulate these changes. The aim of this study is to review the current knowledge about animal and human models investigating pneumoperitoneum-related biological and histological impairment. In particular, pneumoperitoneum is associated with local and systemic inflammation, acidosis, oxidative stress, mesothelium lining abnormalities, and adhesion development. Animal studies reported that an increase in pressure and time and a decrease in humidity and temperature might enhance the rate of comorbidities. However, to date, few studies were conducted on humans; therefore, this research field should be further investigated to confirm in experimental models and humans how to improve laparoscopic procedures in the spirit of minimally invasive surgeries.

在过去的几十年里,腹腔镜手术一直是儿科腹部手术中最常见的手术之一,因为与剖腹手术相比,腹腔镜手术有几个优点,比如住院时间更短,疼痛更少,美容效果更好。然而,它与局部和系统的变化有关。最近的证据表明,二氧化碳气腹可以在压力、持续时间、温度和湿度方面进行调节,以减轻和调节这些变化。本研究的目的是回顾目前关于研究气腹相关生物学和组织学损伤的动物和人类模型的知识。特别是,气腹与局部和全身炎症、酸中毒、氧化应激、间皮内膜异常和粘连发展有关。动物研究报告说,压力和时间的增加以及湿度和温度的降低可能会增加合并症的发生率。然而,迄今为止,对人类进行的研究很少;因此,这一研究领域有待进一步研究,以实验模型和人体验证如何在微创手术的精神下改进腹腔镜手术。
{"title":"The \"Dark Side\" of Pneumoperitoneum and Laparoscopy.","authors":"Giuseppina Rosaria Umano,&nbsp;Giulia Delehaye,&nbsp;Carmine Noviello,&nbsp;Alfonso Papparella","doi":"10.1155/2021/5564745","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5564745","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Laparoscopic surgery has been one of the most common procedures for abdominal surgery at pediatric age during the last few decades as it has several advantages compared to laparotomy, such as shorter hospital stays, less pain, and better cosmetic results. However, it is associated with both local and systemic modifications. Recent evidence demonstrated that carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum might be modulated in terms of pressure, duration, temperature, and humidity to mitigate and modulate these changes. The aim of this study is to review the current knowledge about animal and human models investigating pneumoperitoneum-related biological and histological impairment. In particular, pneumoperitoneum is associated with local and systemic inflammation, acidosis, oxidative stress, mesothelium lining abnormalities, and adhesion development. Animal studies reported that an increase in pressure and time and a decrease in humidity and temperature might enhance the rate of comorbidities. However, to date, few studies were conducted on humans; therefore, this research field should be further investigated to confirm in experimental models and humans how to improve laparoscopic procedures in the spirit of minimally invasive surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8163537/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39068840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Surgery for Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Is Laparoscopy a New Paradigm? 穿孔性消化性溃疡的手术:腹腔镜手术是一个新的范例吗?
IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-05-12 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8828091
André Pereira, Hugo Santos Sousa, Diana Gonçalves, Eduardo Lima da Costa, André Costa Pinho, Elisabete Barbosa, José Barbosa

Introduction: Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) remains controversial mainly due to its safety and applicability in critically ill patients. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the treatment of PPU.

Methods: Single-institutional, retrospective study of all patients submitted to surgical repair of PPU between 2012 and 2019.

Results: During the study period, 169 patients underwent emergent surgery for PPU. A laparoscopic approach was tried in 60 patients and completely performed in 49 of them (conversion rate 18.3%). The open group was composed of 120 patients (included 11 conversions). Comparing the laparoscopic with the open group, there were significant differences in gender (male/female ratio 7.2/1 versus 2.2/1, respectively; p=0.009) and in the presence of sepsis criteria (12.2% versus 38.3%, respectively; p=0.001), while the Boey score showed no differences between the two groups. The operative time was longer in the laparoscopic group (median 100' versus 80', p=0.01). Laparoscopy was associated with few early postoperative complications (18.4% versus 41.7%, p=0.004), mortality (2.0% versus 14.2%; p=0.02), shorter hospital stay (median 6 versus 7 days, p=0.001), and earlier oral intake (median 3 versus 4 days, p=0.021).

Conclusion: Laparoscopic repair of PPU may be considered the procedure of choice in patients without sepsis criteria if expertise and resources are available. This kind of approach is associated with a shorter length of hospital stay and earlier oral intake. In patients with sepsis criteria, more data are required to access the safety of laparoscopy in the treatment of PPU.

腹腔镜修复穿孔性消化性溃疡(PPU)仍存在争议,主要是由于其在危重患者中的安全性和适用性。本研究的目的是比较腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗PPU的效果。方法:对2012年至2019年接受手术修复PPU的所有患者进行单机构回顾性研究。结果:在研究期间,169例患者因PPU接受了紧急手术。60例患者尝试腹腔镜入路,其中49例完全手术(转换率18.3%)。开放组120例(包括11例转诊)。腹腔镜组与开放组比较,性别差异有统计学意义(男女比例分别为7.2/1和2.2/1;P =0.009)和存在脓毒症标准时(分别为12.2%对38.3%;p=0.001),而Boey评分在两组间无差异。腹腔镜组手术时间更长(中位100' vs 80', p=0.01)。腹腔镜术后早期并发症少(18.4%比41.7%,p=0.004),死亡率低(2.0%比14.2%;P =0.02)、更短的住院时间(中位数为6天对7天,P =0.001)和更早的口服摄入(中位数为3天对4天,P =0.021)。结论:如果有专业知识和资源,腹腔镜下PPU修复可以被认为是没有脓毒症标准的患者的首选手术。这种方法与较短的住院时间和较早的口服摄入有关。对于符合脓毒症标准的患者,需要更多的数据来验证腹腔镜治疗PPU的安全性。
{"title":"Surgery for Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Is Laparoscopy a New Paradigm?","authors":"André Pereira,&nbsp;Hugo Santos Sousa,&nbsp;Diana Gonçalves,&nbsp;Eduardo Lima da Costa,&nbsp;André Costa Pinho,&nbsp;Elisabete Barbosa,&nbsp;José Barbosa","doi":"10.1155/2021/8828091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8828091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) remains controversial mainly due to its safety and applicability in critically ill patients. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the treatment of PPU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-institutional, retrospective study of all patients submitted to surgical repair of PPU between 2012 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 169 patients underwent emergent surgery for PPU. A laparoscopic approach was tried in 60 patients and completely performed in 49 of them (conversion rate 18.3%). The open group was composed of 120 patients (included 11 conversions). Comparing the laparoscopic with the open group, there were significant differences in gender (male/female ratio 7.2/1 versus 2.2/1, respectively; <i>p</i>=0.009) and in the presence of sepsis criteria (12.2% versus 38.3%, respectively; <i>p</i>=0.001), while the Boey score showed no differences between the two groups. The operative time was longer in the laparoscopic group (median 100' versus 80', <i>p</i>=0.01). Laparoscopy was associated with few early postoperative complications (18.4% versus 41.7%, <i>p</i>=0.004), mortality (2.0% versus 14.2%; <i>p</i>=0.02), shorter hospital stay (median 6 versus 7 days, <i>p</i>=0.001), and earlier oral intake (median 3 versus 4 days, <i>p</i>=0.021).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic repair of PPU may be considered the procedure of choice in patients without sepsis criteria if expertise and resources are available. This kind of approach is associated with a shorter length of hospital stay and earlier oral intake. In patients with sepsis criteria, more data are required to access the safety of laparoscopy in the treatment of PPU.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8133844/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38965347","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Longitudinal Gastrectomy for Nonbariatric Indications. 纵向胃切除术治疗非减肥适应症。
IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-05-06 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9962130
Oluwatobi O Onafowokan, Aboubakr Khairat, Mohammad Jamal, Hemant Chatrath, Hugo J R Bonatti

Background: Sleeve gastrectomy is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure. Laparoscopic longitudinal gastrectomy (LLG) may be indicated for other indications. Patients and Methods. Two men and two women aged 67, 72, 77, and 80 years underwent LLG for nonbariatric indications with two having normal weight, one being cachectic, and one severely obese.

Results: LLG was discussed with patients prior to surgery, but decision for LLG was made during surgery after contemplating other surgical options. A wide sleeve over a 42 French bougie was created with the staple line being oversewn with running 3-0 silk. Indications included a bleeding Dieulafoy lesion that failed endoscopic clipping, fundus gland polyposis found during paraesophageal hernia repair, fundus nodules suspected to be leiomyosarcoma metastases revealing splenosis on final pathology, and significant gastric dilatation associated with organoaxial gastric volvulus. Three patients had an uneventful recovery; the severely obese patient temporarily lost weight but died after two years from a stroke. The last patient developed dysphagia due to an alpha-loop in the sleeve, which was managed by endoscopic stenting. The device subsequently migrated and was laparoscopically removed, with a side-side gastrogastrostomy performed to straighten the alpha-loop. The patient tolerated food better and with overnight PEG tube feeds gained weight but continued heavy smoking. He died after one year from COPD exacerbation.

Conclusion: LLG seems to be an appropriate intervention for various gastric pathologies. Training of residents and fellows in the minimally invasive surgical steps of LLG is encouraged.

背景:袖式胃切除术是最常用的减肥手术。腹腔镜纵向胃切除术(LLG)可能适用于其他适应症。患者和方法。年龄分别为67岁、72岁、77岁和80岁的两男两女因非肥胖适应症接受了LLG治疗,其中两名体重正常,一名病毒性,一名严重肥胖。结果:手术前与患者讨论了LLG,但在考虑其他手术选择后,在手术中决定LLG。一个宽袖子在一个42法国布吉被创造与主线被缝制与运行3-0丝绸。适应症包括内镜夹闭失败的出血的十二指肠病变,食管旁疝修补时发现的眼底腺息肉,怀疑为平滑肌肉瘤转移的眼底结节,最终病理显示脾肿大,胃明显扩张伴胃器官轴性扭转。3名患者顺利康复;这位严重肥胖的病人体重暂时减轻,但两年后死于中风。最后一位患者由于袖内的α环而出现吞咽困难,这是通过内窥镜支架置入治疗的。该装置随后移动并在腹腔镜下移除,并进行侧侧胃造口术以拉直α环。患者对食物的耐受性较好,夜间PEG管饲后体重增加,但继续大量吸烟。一年后,他死于慢性阻塞性肺病恶化。结论:LLG似乎是一种适合于各种胃病理的干预措施。鼓励对住院医师和研究员进行LLG微创手术步骤的培训。
{"title":"Longitudinal Gastrectomy for Nonbariatric Indications.","authors":"Oluwatobi O Onafowokan,&nbsp;Aboubakr Khairat,&nbsp;Mohammad Jamal,&nbsp;Hemant Chatrath,&nbsp;Hugo J R Bonatti","doi":"10.1155/2021/9962130","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9962130","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleeve gastrectomy is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure. Laparoscopic longitudinal gastrectomy (LLG) may be indicated for other indications. <i>Patients and Methods</i>. Two men and two women aged 67, 72, 77, and 80 years underwent LLG for nonbariatric indications with two having normal weight, one being cachectic, and one severely obese.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LLG was discussed with patients prior to surgery, but decision for LLG was made during surgery after contemplating other surgical options. A wide sleeve over a 42 French bougie was created with the staple line being oversewn with running 3-0 silk. Indications included a bleeding Dieulafoy lesion that failed endoscopic clipping, fundus gland polyposis found during paraesophageal hernia repair, fundus nodules suspected to be leiomyosarcoma metastases revealing splenosis on final pathology, and significant gastric dilatation associated with organoaxial gastric volvulus. Three patients had an uneventful recovery; the severely obese patient temporarily lost weight but died after two years from a stroke. The last patient developed dysphagia due to an alpha-loop in the sleeve, which was managed by endoscopic stenting. The device subsequently migrated and was laparoscopically removed, with a side-side gastrogastrostomy performed to straighten the alpha-loop. The patient tolerated food better and with overnight PEG tube feeds gained weight but continued heavy smoking. He died after one year from COPD exacerbation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LLG seems to be an appropriate intervention for various gastric pathologies. Training of residents and fellows in the minimally invasive surgical steps of LLG is encouraged.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8124009/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39018616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Minimally Invasive Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1