Pub Date : 2018-04-05eCollection Date: 2018-01-01DOI: 10.1155/2018/5230350
Kevin Y Chang, Wellington K Hsu
As the use of minimally invasive spine (MIS) fusion approaches continues to grow, increased scrutiny is being placed on its outcomes and efficacies against traditional open fusion surgeries. While there are many factors that contribute to the success of achieving spinal arthrodesis, selecting the optimal fusion biologic remains a top priority. With an ever-expanding market of bone graft substitutes, it is important to evaluate each of their use as it pertains to MIS techniques. This review will summarize the important characteristics and properties of various spinal biologics used in minimally invasive lumbar surgeries and compare their fusion rates via a systematic review of published literature.
{"title":"Spinal Biologics in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Surgery.","authors":"Kevin Y Chang, Wellington K Hsu","doi":"10.1155/2018/5230350","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5230350","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the use of minimally invasive spine (MIS) fusion approaches continues to grow, increased scrutiny is being placed on its outcomes and efficacies against traditional open fusion surgeries. While there are many factors that contribute to the success of achieving spinal arthrodesis, selecting the optimal fusion biologic remains a top priority. With an ever-expanding market of bone graft substitutes, it is important to evaluate each of their use as it pertains to MIS techniques. This review will summarize the important characteristics and properties of various spinal biologics used in minimally invasive lumbar surgeries and compare their fusion rates via a systematic review of published literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":"2018 ","pages":"5230350"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2018-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/5230350","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36177995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-04-01eCollection Date: 2018-01-01DOI: 10.1155/2018/4760769
Megan R Hsu, Meraaj S Haleem, Wellington Hsu
3D printing (3DP) technology continues to gain popularity among medical specialties as a useful tool to improve patient care. The field of spine surgery is one discipline that has utilized this; however, information regarding the use of 3DP in minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) is limited. 3D printing is currently being utilized in spine surgery to create biomodels, hardware templates and guides, and implants. Minimally invasive spine surgeons have begun to adopt 3DP technology, specifically with the use of biomodeling to optimize preoperative planning. Factors limiting widespread adoption of 3DP include increased time, cost, and the limited range of diagnoses in which 3DP has thus far been utilized. 3DP technology has become a valuable tool utilized by spine surgeons, and there are limitless directions in which this technology can be applied to minimally invasive spine surgery.
{"title":"3D Printing Applications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.","authors":"Megan R Hsu, Meraaj S Haleem, Wellington Hsu","doi":"10.1155/2018/4760769","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4760769","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>3D printing (3DP) technology continues to gain popularity among medical specialties as a useful tool to improve patient care. The field of spine surgery is one discipline that has utilized this; however, information regarding the use of 3DP in minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) is limited. 3D printing is currently being utilized in spine surgery to create biomodels, hardware templates and guides, and implants. Minimally invasive spine surgeons have begun to adopt 3DP technology, specifically with the use of biomodeling to optimize preoperative planning. Factors limiting widespread adoption of 3DP include increased time, cost, and the limited range of diagnoses in which 3DP has thus far been utilized. 3DP technology has become a valuable tool utilized by spine surgeons, and there are limitless directions in which this technology can be applied to minimally invasive spine surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":"2018 ","pages":"4760769"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/4760769","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36136226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-03-28eCollection Date: 2018-01-01DOI: 10.1155/2018/6130286
Vadim A Byvaltsev, Serik K Akshulakov, Roman A Polkin, Sergey V Ochkal, Ivan A Stepanov, Yerbol T Makhambetov, Talgat T Kerimbayev, Michael Staren, Evgenii Belykh, Mark C Preul
Cerebrovascular diseases are among the most widespread diseases in the world, which largely determine the structure of morbidity and mortality rates. Microvascular anastomosis techniques are important for revascularization surgeries on brachiocephalic and carotid arteries and complex cerebral aneurysms and even during resection of brain tumors that obstruct major cerebral arteries. Training in microvascular surgery became even more difficult with less case exposure and growth of the use of endovascular techniques. In this text we will briefly discuss the history of microvascular surgery, review current literature on simulation models with the emphasis on their merits and shortcomings, and describe the views and opinions on the future of the microvascular training in neurosurgery. In "dry" microsurgical training, various models created from artificial materials that simulate biological tissues are used. The next stage in training more experienced surgeons is to work with nonliving tissue models. Microvascular training using live models is considered to be the most relevant due to presence of the blood flow. Training on laboratory animals has high indicators of face and constructive validity. One of the future directions in the development of microsurgical techniques is the use of robotic systems. Robotic systems may play a role in teaching future generations of microsurgeons. Modern technologies allow access to highly accurate learning environments that are extremely similar to real environment. Additionally, assessment of microsurgical skills should become a fundamental part of the current evaluation of competence within a microneurosurgical training program. Such an assessment tool could be utilized to ensure a constant level of surgical competence within the recertification process. It is important that this evaluation be based on validated models.
{"title":"Microvascular Anastomosis Training in Neurosurgery: A Review.","authors":"Vadim A Byvaltsev, Serik K Akshulakov, Roman A Polkin, Sergey V Ochkal, Ivan A Stepanov, Yerbol T Makhambetov, Talgat T Kerimbayev, Michael Staren, Evgenii Belykh, Mark C Preul","doi":"10.1155/2018/6130286","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2018/6130286","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cerebrovascular diseases are among the most widespread diseases in the world, which largely determine the structure of morbidity and mortality rates. Microvascular anastomosis techniques are important for revascularization surgeries on brachiocephalic and carotid arteries and complex cerebral aneurysms and even during resection of brain tumors that obstruct major cerebral arteries. Training in microvascular surgery became even more difficult with less case exposure and growth of the use of endovascular techniques. In this text we will briefly discuss the history of microvascular surgery, review current literature on simulation models with the emphasis on their merits and shortcomings, and describe the views and opinions on the future of the microvascular training in neurosurgery. In \"dry\" microsurgical training, various models created from artificial materials that simulate biological tissues are used. The next stage in training more experienced surgeons is to work with nonliving tissue models. Microvascular training using live models is considered to be the most relevant due to presence of the blood flow. Training on laboratory animals has high indicators of face and constructive validity. One of the future directions in the development of microsurgical techniques is the use of robotic systems. Robotic systems may play a role in teaching future generations of microsurgeons. Modern technologies allow access to highly accurate learning environments that are extremely similar to real environment. Additionally, assessment of microsurgical skills should become a fundamental part of the current evaluation of competence within a microneurosurgical training program. Such an assessment tool could be utilized to ensure a constant level of surgical competence within the recertification process. It is important that this evaluation be based on validated models.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":"2018 ","pages":"6130286"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2018-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/6130286","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36127277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-01-24eCollection Date: 2018-01-01DOI: 10.1155/2018/4185840
Michael B Cloney, Jack A Goergen, Angela M Bohnen, Zachary A Smith, Tyler Koski, Nader Dahdaleh
Objective: Recently, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been included among the treatment modalities for scoliosis. However, literature comparing MIS to open surgery for scoliosis correction is limited. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes for scoliosis correction patients undergoing MIS versus open approach.
Methods: We retrospectively collected data on demographics, procedure characteristics, and outcomes for 207 consecutive scoliosis correction surgeries at our institution between 2009 and 2015.
Results: MIS patients had lower number of levels fused (p < 0.0001), shorter surgeries (p = 0.0023), and shorter overall lengths of stay (p < 0.0001), were less likely to be admitted to the ICU (p < 0.0001), and had shorter ICU stays (p = 0.0015). On multivariable regression, number of levels fused predicted selection for MIS procedure (p = 0.004), and multiple other variables showed trends toward significance. Age predicted ICU admission and VTE. BMI predicted any VTE, and DVT specifically. Comorbid disease burden predicted readmission, need for transfusion, and ICU admission. Number of levels fused predicted prolonged surgery, need for transfusion, and ICU admission.
Conclusions: Patients undergoing MIS correction had shorter surgeries, shorter lengths of stay, and shorter and fewer ICU stays, but there was a significant selection effect. Accounting for other variables, MIS did not independently predict any of the outcomes.
{"title":"The Role of Minimally Invasive Techniques in Scoliosis Correction Surgery.","authors":"Michael B Cloney, Jack A Goergen, Angela M Bohnen, Zachary A Smith, Tyler Koski, Nader Dahdaleh","doi":"10.1155/2018/4185840","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2018/4185840","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recently, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been included among the treatment modalities for scoliosis. However, literature comparing MIS to open surgery for scoliosis correction is limited. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes for scoliosis correction patients undergoing MIS versus open approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected data on demographics, procedure characteristics, and outcomes for 207 consecutive scoliosis correction surgeries at our institution between 2009 and 2015.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MIS patients had lower number of levels fused (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), shorter surgeries (<i>p</i> = 0.0023), and shorter overall lengths of stay (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), were less likely to be admitted to the ICU (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), and had shorter ICU stays (<i>p</i> = 0.0015). On multivariable regression, number of levels fused predicted selection for MIS procedure (<i>p</i> = 0.004), and multiple other variables showed trends toward significance. Age predicted ICU admission and VTE. BMI predicted any VTE, and DVT specifically. Comorbid disease burden predicted readmission, need for transfusion, and ICU admission. Number of levels fused predicted prolonged surgery, need for transfusion, and ICU admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients undergoing MIS correction had shorter surgeries, shorter lengths of stay, and shorter and fewer ICU stays, but there was a significant selection effect. Accounting for other variables, MIS did not independently predict any of the outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":"2018 ","pages":"4185840"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2018-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829336/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35981715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-01-10eCollection Date: 2018-01-01DOI: 10.1155/2018/4815761
Sriram Garudeswaran, Sohyung Cho, Ikechukwu Ohu, Ali K Panahi
Recent technological progress offers the opportunity to significantly transform conventional open surgical procedures in ways that allow minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to be accomplished by specific operative instruments' entry into the body through key-sized holes rather than large incisions. Although MIS offers an opportunity for less trauma and quicker recovery, thereby reducing length of hospital stay and attendant costs, the complex nature of this procedure makes it difficult to master, not least because of the limited work area and constricted degree of freedom. Accordingly, this research seeks to design a Teach and Playback device that can aid surgical training by key-framing and then reproducing surgical motions. The result is an inexpensive and portable Teach and Playback laparoscopic training device that can record a trainer's surgical motions and then play them back for trainees. Indeed, such a device could provide a training platform for surgical residents generally and would also be susceptible of many other applications for other robot-assisted tasks that might require complex motion training and control.
{"title":"Teach and Playback Training Device for Minimally Invasive Surgery.","authors":"Sriram Garudeswaran, Sohyung Cho, Ikechukwu Ohu, Ali K Panahi","doi":"10.1155/2018/4815761","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4815761","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent technological progress offers the opportunity to significantly transform conventional open surgical procedures in ways that allow minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to be accomplished by specific operative instruments' entry into the body through key-sized holes rather than large incisions. Although MIS offers an opportunity for less trauma and quicker recovery, thereby reducing length of hospital stay and attendant costs, the complex nature of this procedure makes it difficult to master, not least because of the limited work area and constricted degree of freedom. Accordingly, this research seeks to design a Teach and Playback device that can aid surgical training by key-framing and then reproducing surgical motions. The result is an inexpensive and portable Teach and Playback laparoscopic training device that can record a trainer's surgical motions and then play them back for trainees. Indeed, such a device could provide a training platform for surgical residents generally and would also be susceptible of many other applications for other robot-assisted tasks that might require complex motion training and control.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":"2018 ","pages":"4815761"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2018-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/4815761","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35926600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-01-01Epub Date: 2017-12-31DOI: 10.1155/2017/6481856
Rozaliia F Solodova, Vladimir V Galatenko, Eldar R Nakashidze, Sergey G Shapovalyants, Igor L Andreytsev, Mikhail E Sokolov, Vladimir E Podolskii
Background and aims: Small gastric or colorectal tumours can be visually undetectable during laparoscopic surgeries, and available methods still do not provide a 100% localisation rate. Thus, new methods for further improvements in tumour localisation are highly desirable. In this study, we evaluated the usage of the Medical Tactile Endosurgical Complex (MTEC) in gastrointestinal surgery for localisation of tumours. The MTEC provides the possibility of instrumental mechanoreceptoric palpation, which serves as an analogue of conventional manual palpation.
Methods: Ninety-six elective surgeries were performed, including 48 open surgeries, 43 laparoscopies, and 5 robot-assisted surgeries. The 20 mm version of the MTEC tactile mechanoreceptor was used in open surgeries, and the 10 mm version in laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgeries.
Results: The mean time of instrumental mechanoreceptoric palpation was 3 minutes 12 seconds for open surgeries, which constituted the early stage of the learning curve, and 3 minutes 34 seconds for laparoscopic surgeries. No side effects or postoperative complications related to instrumental mechanoreceptoric palpation were observed, and this procedure provided data sufficient for tumour localisation in more than 95% of cases.
Conclusion: Instrumental mechanoreceptoric palpation performed using MTEC is a simple, safe, and reliable method for tumour localisation in gastrointestinal laparoscopic surgery.
{"title":"Instrumental Mechanoreceptoric Palpation in Gastrointestinal Surgery.","authors":"Rozaliia F Solodova, Vladimir V Galatenko, Eldar R Nakashidze, Sergey G Shapovalyants, Igor L Andreytsev, Mikhail E Sokolov, Vladimir E Podolskii","doi":"10.1155/2017/6481856","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6481856","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Small gastric or colorectal tumours can be visually undetectable during laparoscopic surgeries, and available methods still do not provide a 100% localisation rate. Thus, new methods for further improvements in tumour localisation are highly desirable. In this study, we evaluated the usage of the Medical Tactile Endosurgical Complex (MTEC) in gastrointestinal surgery for localisation of tumours. The MTEC provides the possibility of instrumental mechanoreceptoric palpation, which serves as an analogue of conventional manual palpation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-six elective surgeries were performed, including 48 open surgeries, 43 laparoscopies, and 5 robot-assisted surgeries. The 20 mm version of the MTEC tactile mechanoreceptor was used in open surgeries, and the 10 mm version in laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgeries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean time of instrumental mechanoreceptoric palpation was 3 minutes 12 seconds for open surgeries, which constituted the early stage of the learning curve, and 3 minutes 34 seconds for laparoscopic surgeries. No side effects or postoperative complications related to instrumental mechanoreceptoric palpation were observed, and this procedure provided data sufficient for tumour localisation in more than 95% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Instrumental mechanoreceptoric palpation performed using MTEC is a simple, safe, and reliable method for tumour localisation in gastrointestinal laparoscopic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":"2017 ","pages":"6481856"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/6481856","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35849381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-01-01Epub Date: 2017-12-06DOI: 10.1155/2017/6907896
Hans C Rolff, Rikard B Ambrus, Mohammed Belmouhand, Michael P Achiam, Marianne Wegmann, Mette Siemsen, Steen C Kofoed, Lars B Svendsen
Aim: To compare the peri- and postoperative data between a hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy (HMIE) and the conventional Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Methods: Retrospective comparison of perioperative characteristics, postoperative complications, and survival between HMIE and Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Results: 216 patients were included, with 160 procedures performed with the conventional and 56 with the HMIE approach. Lower perioperative blood loss was found in the HMIE group (600 ml versus 200 ml, p < 0.001). Also, a higher median number of lymph nodes were harvested in the HMIE group (median 28) than in the conventional group (median 23) (p = 0.002). The median length of stay was longer in the conventional group compared to the HMIE group (11.5 days versus 10.0 days, p = 0.03). Patients in the HMIE group experienced fewer grade 2 or higher complications than the conventional group (39% versus 57%, p = 0.03). The rate of all pulmonary (51% versus 43%, p = 0.32) and severe pulmonary complications (38% versus 18%, p = 0.23) was not statistically different between the groups.
Conclusions: The HMIE was associated with lower intraoperative blood loss, a higher lymph node harvest, and a shorter hospital stay. However, the inborn limitations with the retrospective design stress a need for prospective randomized studies. Registration number is DRKS00013023.
目的:比较混合微创食管切除术(HMIE)与常规Ivor Lewis食管切除术的围手术期和术后数据。方法:回顾性比较HMIE食管切除术与Ivor Lewis食管切除术的围手术期特点、术后并发症及生存率。结果:纳入216例患者,其中160例采用常规入路,56例采用HMIE入路。HMIE组围手术期出血量较低(600 ml vs 200 ml, p < 0.001)。此外,HMIE组的淋巴结中位数(中位数28)高于常规组(中位数23)(p = 0.002)。与HMIE组相比,常规组的中位住院时间更长(11.5天对10.0天,p = 0.03)。与常规组相比,HMIE组患者出现的2级或以上并发症较少(39%对57%,p = 0.03)。两组间肺部并发症发生率(51%比43%,p = 0.32)和严重肺部并发症发生率(38%比18%,p = 0.23)无统计学差异。结论:HMIE与较低的术中出血量、较高的淋巴结收获和较短的住院时间有关。然而,回顾性设计的先天局限性强调了前瞻性随机研究的必要性。注册号为DRKS00013023。
{"title":"Robot-Assisted Hybrid Esophagectomy Is Associated with a Shorter Length of Stay Compared to Conventional Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Hans C Rolff, Rikard B Ambrus, Mohammed Belmouhand, Michael P Achiam, Marianne Wegmann, Mette Siemsen, Steen C Kofoed, Lars B Svendsen","doi":"10.1155/2017/6907896","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6907896","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the peri- and postoperative data between a hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy (HMIE) and the conventional Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective comparison of perioperative characteristics, postoperative complications, and survival between HMIE and Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>216 patients were included, with 160 procedures performed with the conventional and 56 with the HMIE approach. Lower perioperative blood loss was found in the HMIE group (600 ml versus 200 ml, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Also, a higher median number of lymph nodes were harvested in the HMIE group (median 28) than in the conventional group (median 23) (<i>p</i> = 0.002). The median length of stay was longer in the conventional group compared to the HMIE group (11.5 days versus 10.0 days, <i>p</i> = 0.03). Patients in the HMIE group experienced fewer grade 2 or higher complications than the conventional group (39% versus 57%, <i>p</i> = 0.03). The rate of all pulmonary (51% versus 43%, <i>p</i> = 0.32) and severe pulmonary complications (38% versus 18%, <i>p</i> = 0.23) was not statistically different between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HMIE was associated with lower intraoperative blood loss, a higher lymph node harvest, and a shorter hospital stay. However, the inborn limitations with the retrospective design stress a need for prospective randomized studies. Registration number is DRKS00013023.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":"2017 ","pages":"6907896"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/6907896","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35762441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-01-01Epub Date: 2017-07-06DOI: 10.1155/2017/4367059
David L Warner, Kent C Sasse
Introduction: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a widely utilized and effective surgical procedure for dramatic weight loss in obese patients. Leak at the sleeve staple line is the most serious complication of this procedure, occurring in 1-3% of cases. Techniques to minimize the risk of sleeve gastrectomy leaks have been published although no universally agreed upon set of techniques exists. This report describes a single-surgeon experience with an approach to sleeve leak prevention resulting in a progressive decrease in leak rate over 5 years.
Methods: 1070 consecutive sleeve gastrectomy cases between 2012 and 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Patient characteristics, sleeve leaks, and percent body weight loss at 6 months were reported for each year. Conceptual and technical changes aimed towards leak reduction are presented.
Results: With the implementation of the described techniques of the sleeve gastrectomy, the rate of sleeve leaks fell from 4% in 2012 to 0% in 2015 and 2016 without a significant change in weight loss, as depicted by 6-month change in body weight and percent excess BMI lost.
Conclusion: In this single-surgeon experience, sleeve gastrectomy leak rate has fallen to 0% since the implementation of specific technical modifications in the procedure.
{"title":"Technical Details of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Leading to Lowered Leak Rate: Discussion of 1070 Consecutive Cases.","authors":"David L Warner, Kent C Sasse","doi":"10.1155/2017/4367059","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4367059","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a widely utilized and effective surgical procedure for dramatic weight loss in obese patients. Leak at the sleeve staple line is the most serious complication of this procedure, occurring in 1-3% of cases. Techniques to minimize the risk of sleeve gastrectomy leaks have been published although no universally agreed upon set of techniques exists. This report describes a single-surgeon experience with an approach to sleeve leak prevention resulting in a progressive decrease in leak rate over 5 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1070 consecutive sleeve gastrectomy cases between 2012 and 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Patient characteristics, sleeve leaks, and percent body weight loss at 6 months were reported for each year. Conceptual and technical changes aimed towards leak reduction are presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With the implementation of the described techniques of the sleeve gastrectomy, the rate of sleeve leaks fell from 4% in 2012 to 0% in 2015 and 2016 without a significant change in weight loss, as depicted by 6-month change in body weight and percent excess BMI lost.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this single-surgeon experience, sleeve gastrectomy leak rate has fallen to 0% since the implementation of specific technical modifications in the procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":"2017 ","pages":"4367059"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/4367059","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35370970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-01-01Epub Date: 2017-07-11DOI: 10.1155/2017/9814389
Piera Leon, Fabiola Giudici, Antonio Sciuto, Francesco Corcione
Background: Gallstone disease affects 15-20% of the general population and up to 20% of these patients present common bile duct stones.
Aim: This observational study reports our experience on routine cysticotomy and flushing of the cystic duct in patients with low risk of common duct stones.
Materials and methods: We analyzed 731 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between September 2013 and September 2015.
Results: Patients were preoperatively stratified on the clinical risk; those presenting with low preoperative risk of common bile duct stones were referred to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy and routine cysticotomy with bile duct flushing. Patients presenting thick bile sludge, solid debrides, and/or increased tension of bile outflow underwent unplanned cholangiography. No intraoperative complications or conversion to open technique occurred. Average follow-up time was 22,8 months (range 12 to 37). Rate of retained ductal stones accounted for 0,3%.
Conclusions: Routine cysticotomy and bile flushing in our experience is a valid, simple, and not time consuming manoeuvre that can help decompressing and flushing CBD. Moreover, it is a valid tool for extending selective IOC approach in a focused manner. Further evaluations have to be conducted to evaluate risks and effectiveness of this manoeuvre.
{"title":"Routine Cysticotomy and Flushing of the Cystic Duct in Patients with Low Risk of Common Duct Stones: Can It Be Beneficial?","authors":"Piera Leon, Fabiola Giudici, Antonio Sciuto, Francesco Corcione","doi":"10.1155/2017/9814389","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9814389","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gallstone disease affects 15-20% of the general population and up to 20% of these patients present common bile duct stones.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This observational study reports our experience on routine cysticotomy and flushing of the cystic duct in patients with low risk of common duct stones.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We analyzed 731 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between September 2013 and September 2015.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were preoperatively stratified on the clinical risk; those presenting with low preoperative risk of common bile duct stones were referred to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy and routine cysticotomy with bile duct flushing. Patients presenting thick bile sludge, solid debrides, and/or increased tension of bile outflow underwent unplanned cholangiography. No intraoperative complications or conversion to open technique occurred. Average follow-up time was 22,8 months (range 12 to 37). Rate of retained ductal stones accounted for 0,3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Routine cysticotomy and bile flushing in our experience is a valid, simple, and not time consuming manoeuvre that can help decompressing and flushing CBD. Moreover, it is a valid tool for extending selective IOC approach in a focused manner. Further evaluations have to be conducted to evaluate risks and effectiveness of this manoeuvre.</p>","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":"2017 ","pages":"9814389"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/9814389","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35298149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
TULAA or Transumbilical Laparoscopic Assisted Appendicectomy is a minimally invasive technique described by Pelosi in 1992 for the removal of the inflamed appendix. Its main advantage is the possibility of exploring the peritoneal cavity and performing a simple and safe extracorporeal appendicectomy. Since its first description, different authors reported their experience with such technique. The aim of this review is to summarise the surgical outcomes currently reported in the literature for this minimally invasive surgical approach and compare it with standard open and laparoscopic appendicectomy.
{"title":"TULAA: A Minimally Invasive Appendicectomy Technique for the Paediatric Patient","authors":"G. Perin, M. Scarpa","doi":"10.1155/2016/6132741","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6132741","url":null,"abstract":"TULAA or Transumbilical Laparoscopic Assisted Appendicectomy is a minimally invasive technique described by Pelosi in 1992 for the removal of the inflamed appendix. Its main advantage is the possibility of exploring the peritoneal cavity and performing a simple and safe extracorporeal appendicectomy. Since its first description, different authors reported their experience with such technique. The aim of this review is to summarise the surgical outcomes currently reported in the literature for this minimally invasive surgical approach and compare it with standard open and laparoscopic appendicectomy.","PeriodicalId":45110,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Surgery","volume":"2016 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2016-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2016/6132741","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"64459800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}