首页 > 最新文献

Urology Practice最新文献

英文 中文
Development, Implementation, and Impact of an Electronic Medical Record Alert System for Implanted Artificial Urinary Sphincters. 植入式人工尿括约肌电子病历报警系统的开发、实施和影响。
IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000750
Philip Olson, Dylan Buller, Maria Antony, Jennifer Lindelof, Ilene Staff, Tara McLaughlin Proto, Joseph Tortora, Kevin Pinto, Laura Olivo Valentin, Fadi Hammami, Joseph Wagner, Jared Bieniek, Richard Kershen

Introduction: The presence of an artificial urinary sphincter can be overlooked resulting in inadvertent urethral catheterization and cuff erosion. A hard-stop best practice advisory was created in the electronic medical record to alert for the presence of an artificial urinary sphincter. We evaluated its utilization and impact on patient outcomes.

Methods: Our advisory fired for men with an artificial urinary sphincter implanted or in place between August 1, 2016, and September 30, 2023. We calculated exposure years (total time in years of implant duration during each time period), which were used to determine incidence rates of explants, erosions, and erosions preceded by catheterization before and after advisory implementation. Rate ratios (adverse event rate/exposure years) were compared before and after advisory using a test of 2 rates based on Poisson distribution. P values < .05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: Two hundred thirteen unique implants were identified in 194 patients. The advisory fired 2425 times for a median of 36 unique patients per month. Twenty-five explants occurred, with 22 (0.6/exposure years) before advisory and 3 (0.1/exposure years) after advisory (P = .01). Nineteen (0.03/exposure years) of the 25 explants were due to cuff erosion, with 17 of 19 (0.04/exposure years) occurring before advisory and 2 of 19 (0.01/exposure years) occurring after advisory (P = .02). Ten (0.03/exposure years) of the 19 erosions were preceded by inadvertent catheterization without implant deactivation, all of which occurred before advisory. No erosions preceded by inadvertent catheterization occurred after advisory.

Conclusions: Our novel advisory has strong implications for patient safety in men with artificial urinary sphincters.

导读:人工尿道括约肌的存在可能被忽视,导致无意的尿道导尿和袖带糜烂。在电子医疗记录中创建了一个硬停止最佳实践咨询,以警告人工尿道括约肌的存在。我们评估了它的使用情况和对患者预后的影响。方法:我们对2016年8月1日至2023年9月30日期间植入或放置人工尿道括约肌的男性进行了咨询。我们计算了暴露年数(每个时间段内种植体持续时间的总年数),用于确定在咨询实施之前和之后导管置入之前的外植体、糜烂和糜烂的发生率。使用基于泊松分布的2率检验比较咨询前后的比率(不良事件率/暴露年数)。P值< 0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:在194例患者中鉴定出213种独特的种植体。该咨询每月解雇2425次,平均36名独特患者。25例外植体发生,其中咨询前22例(0.6/暴露年),咨询后3例(0.1/暴露年)(P = 0.01)。25个外植体中有19个(0.03/暴露年)是由于袖口糜烂引起的,19个中有17个(0.04/暴露年)发生在咨询之前,19个中有2个(0.01/暴露年)发生在咨询之后(P = 0.02)。在19例侵蚀中,有10例(0.03/暴露年)在未停用种植体的情况下误置导管,所有这些都发生在咨询之前。咨询后未发生因不慎置管引起的糜烂。结论:我们的新建议对男性人工尿道括约肌患者的安全具有重要意义。
{"title":"Development, Implementation, and Impact of an Electronic Medical Record Alert System for Implanted Artificial Urinary Sphincters.","authors":"Philip Olson, Dylan Buller, Maria Antony, Jennifer Lindelof, Ilene Staff, Tara McLaughlin Proto, Joseph Tortora, Kevin Pinto, Laura Olivo Valentin, Fadi Hammami, Joseph Wagner, Jared Bieniek, Richard Kershen","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000750","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000750","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The presence of an artificial urinary sphincter can be overlooked resulting in inadvertent urethral catheterization and cuff erosion. A hard-stop best practice advisory was created in the electronic medical record to alert for the presence of an artificial urinary sphincter. We evaluated its utilization and impact on patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our advisory fired for men with an artificial urinary sphincter implanted or in place between August 1, 2016, and September 30, 2023. We calculated exposure years (total time in years of implant duration during each time period), which were used to determine incidence rates of explants, erosions, and erosions preceded by catheterization before and after advisory implementation. Rate ratios (adverse event rate/exposure years) were compared before and after advisory using a test of 2 rates based on Poisson distribution. <i>P</i> values < .05 were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred thirteen unique implants were identified in 194 patients. The advisory fired 2425 times for a median of 36 unique patients per month. Twenty-five explants occurred, with 22 (0.6/exposure years) before advisory and 3 (0.1/exposure years) after advisory (<i>P</i> = .01). Nineteen (0.03/exposure years) of the 25 explants were due to cuff erosion, with 17 of 19 (0.04/exposure years) occurring before advisory and 2 of 19 (0.01/exposure years) occurring after advisory (<i>P</i> = .02). Ten (0.03/exposure years) of the 19 erosions were preceded by inadvertent catheterization without implant deactivation, all of which occurred before advisory. No erosions preceded by inadvertent catheterization occurred after advisory.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our novel advisory has strong implications for patient safety in men with artificial urinary sphincters.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"101097UPJ0000000000000750"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of ChatGPT as a Reliable Source of Medical Information on Prostate Cancer for Patients: Global Comparative Survey of Medical Oncologists and Urologists. 对 ChatGPT 作为前列腺癌患者可靠医疗信息来源的评估:肿瘤内科医生和泌尿科医生的全球比较调查。
IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000740
Arnulf Stenzl, Andrew J Armstrong, Eamonn Rogers, Dany Habr, Jochen Walz, Martin Gleave, Andrea Sboner, Jennifer Ghith, Lucile Serfass, Kristine W Schuler, Sam Garas, Dheepa Chari, Ken Truman, Cora N Sternberg

Introduction: No consensus exists on performance standards for evaluation of generative artificial intelligence (AI) to generate medical responses. The purpose of this study was the assessment of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) to address medical questions in prostate cancer.

Methods: A global online survey was conducted from April to June 2023 among > 700 medical oncologists or urologists who treat patients with prostate cancer. Participants were unaware this was a survey evaluating AI. In component 1, responses to 9 questions were written independently by medical writers (MWs; from medical websites) and ChatGPT-4.0 (AI generated from publicly available information). Respondents were randomly exposed and blinded to both AI-generated and MW-curated responses; evaluation criteria and overall preference were recorded. Exploratory component 2 evaluated AI-generated responses to 5 complex questions with nuanced answers in the medical literature. Responses were evaluated on a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical significance was denoted by P < .05.

Results: In component 1, respondents (N = 602) consistently preferred the clarity of AI-generated responses over MW-curated responses in 7 of 9 questions (P < .05). Despite favoring AI-generated responses when blinded to questions/answers, respondents considered medical websites a more credible source (52%-67%) than ChatGPT (14%). Respondents in component 2 (N = 98) also considered medical websites more credible than ChatGPT, but rated AI-generated responses highly for all evaluation criteria, despite nuanced answers in the medical literature.

Conclusions: These findings provide insight into how clinicians rate AI-generated and MW-curated responses with evaluation criteria that can be used in future AI validation studies.

目的:在评估生成式人工智能(AI)生成医疗回复的性能标准方面尚未达成共识。本研究的目的是评估聊天生成预训练转换器(ChatGPT)在解决前列腺癌医疗问题方面的性能:2023 年 4 月至 6 月,对超过 700 名治疗前列腺癌患者的肿瘤内科医生或泌尿科医生进行了全球在线调查。参与者并不知道这是一项评估人工智能的调查。在第 1 部分中,9 个问题的回答由医学撰稿人(MW;来自医学网站)和 ChatGPT-4.0(根据公开信息生成的人工智能)独立撰写。受访者随机接触人工智能生成的回答和医学撰稿人撰写的回答,并对两者进行盲测;记录评价标准和总体偏好。探索部分 2 对人工智能生成的回答进行了评估,这些回答涉及医学文献中五个复杂问题的细微差别。回答采用 5 点李克特量表进行评估。统计意义以 P < .05 表示:在第 1 部分中,有 7/9 个问题的受访者(N = 602)始终更喜欢人工智能生成的回答,而不是医学文献整理的回答(P < .05)。尽管在对问题/答案进行盲测时,受访者更倾向于人工智能生成的回答,但他们认为医疗网站(52%-67%)比 ChatGPT(14%)是更可信的来源。第 2 部分的受访者(N = 98)也认为医学网站比 ChatGPT 更可信,但尽管医学文献中的答案有细微差别,受访者对人工智能生成的回复在所有评价标准中的评分都很高:这些发现为临床医生如何根据评价标准对人工智能生成的回复和 MW 整理的回复进行评分提供了见解,可用于未来的人工智能验证研究。
{"title":"Evaluation of ChatGPT as a Reliable Source of Medical Information on Prostate Cancer for Patients: Global Comparative Survey of Medical Oncologists and Urologists.","authors":"Arnulf Stenzl, Andrew J Armstrong, Eamonn Rogers, Dany Habr, Jochen Walz, Martin Gleave, Andrea Sboner, Jennifer Ghith, Lucile Serfass, Kristine W Schuler, Sam Garas, Dheepa Chari, Ken Truman, Cora N Sternberg","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000740","DOIUrl":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000740","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>No consensus exists on performance standards for evaluation of generative artificial intelligence (AI) to generate medical responses. The purpose of this study was the assessment of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) to address medical questions in prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A global online survey was conducted from April to June 2023 among > 700 medical oncologists or urologists who treat patients with prostate cancer. Participants were unaware this was a survey evaluating AI. In component 1, responses to 9 questions were written independently by medical writers (MWs; from medical websites) and ChatGPT-4.0 (AI generated from publicly available information). Respondents were randomly exposed and blinded to both AI-generated and MW-curated responses; evaluation criteria and overall preference were recorded. Exploratory component 2 evaluated AI-generated responses to 5 complex questions with nuanced answers in the medical literature. Responses were evaluated on a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical significance was denoted by <i>P</i> < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In component 1, respondents (N = 602) consistently preferred the clarity of AI-generated responses over MW-curated responses in 7 of 9 questions (<i>P</i> < .05). Despite favoring AI-generated responses when blinded to questions/answers, respondents considered medical websites a more credible source (52%-67%) than ChatGPT (14%). Respondents in component 2 (N = 98) also considered medical websites more credible than ChatGPT, but rated AI-generated responses highly for all evaluation criteria, despite nuanced answers in the medical literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings provide insight into how clinicians rate AI-generated and MW-curated responses with evaluation criteria that can be used in future AI validation studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"101097UPJ0000000000000740"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142606714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial Commentary. 社论评论。
IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000747
Arianna Biasatti, Riccardo Autorino
{"title":"Editorial Commentary.","authors":"Arianna Biasatti, Riccardo Autorino","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000747","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000747","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"101097UPJ0000000000000747"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142606710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter: Iatrogenic Male Infertility: Novel Challenges. 信:先天性男性不育:新的挑战。
IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000748
Peter N Schlegel
{"title":"Letter: Iatrogenic Male Infertility: Novel Challenges.","authors":"Peter N Schlegel","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000748","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000748","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"101097UPJ0000000000000748"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142606718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What is Needed to Support Non-Urban Urology in the United States? Perspectives from Urologists in Rural and Underresourced Areas. 美国非城市地区泌尿外科需要哪些支持?农村和资源不足地区泌尿科医生的观点。
IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000741
Kathleen Kieran, Candace Granberg, Christopher Deibert, Arthur L Burnett, Paul H Chung

Introduction: Twenty percent of Americans live in non-urban areas, and the challenges in providing high-quality health care in rural areas are well described. These challenges are further exacerbated by the fact that rural citizens are often older and sicker than their urban colleagues, as well as by the ongoing workforce shortage in urology. This study aims to describe the current practice experiences of non-metropolitan urologists (NMUs) in the United States.

Methods: Based on the results of the 2022 American Urological Association Census, a secondary questionnaire was developed and distributed electronically to urologists who self-identified in the Census as practicing in non-metropolitan areas. Multiple choice answers were summarized as proportions and free-text answers were collected and grouped by theme.

Results: One hundred and thirteen of 552 (20.5%) urologists responded. Most respondents were male (92.9%), aged >55 years (76.1%), in practice >25 years, and in solo practice (25.5%) or a subspecialty group (20.8%). Stressors for NMUs included recruitment (61.3%), call concerns (59.3%), workforce issues (59.3%), difficulty interacting with tertiary medical centers (45.1%), and lack of resources (40.7%). Nearly half of respondents (48.5%) experience burnout more than once monthly, and 31.9% anticipate continuing their current practice and pace for the next five years. Call burden is the most likely reason to leave practice (40%).

Conclusions: Most urologists practicing in non-metropolitan areas are older, endorse high rates of burnout, and have active plans to leave or decrease practice within five years. Understanding contemporary stressors can inform policies to support current and future NMUs.

导言:20% 的美国人居住在非城市地区,而在农村地区提供高质量医疗保健服务所面临的挑战是众所周知的。与城市居民相比,农村居民通常年龄更大、病得更多,加上泌尿科人才持续短缺,这些挑战进一步加剧。本研究旨在描述美国非大都市泌尿科医生(NMUs)目前的实践经验:根据 2022 年美国泌尿外科协会人口普查的结果,我们编制了一份二次问卷,并以电子方式分发给在人口普查中自我认定为在非大都市地区执业的泌尿科医生。多选答案按比例汇总,自由文本答案按主题收集和分组:在 552 位泌尿科医生中,有 113 位(20.5%)做出了回复。大多数受访者为男性(92.9%),年龄大于 55 岁(76.1%),从业时间大于 25 年,单独执业(25.5%)或为亚专科小组成员(20.8%)。非医疗单位的压力包括招聘(61.3%)、呼叫问题(59.3%)、劳动力问题(59.3%)、与三级医疗中心互动的困难(45.1%)和资源缺乏(40.7%)。近一半的受访者(48.5%)每月都会出现一次以上的职业倦怠,31.9%的受访者预计在未来五年内将继续保持目前的工作状态和节奏。呼叫负担是最有可能离职的原因(40%):结论:大多数在非大都市地区执业的泌尿科医生年龄较大,职业倦怠率较高,并有在五年内离开或减少执业的积极计划。了解当代的压力因素可以为支持当前和未来的非城市地区泌尿科医生的政策提供参考。
{"title":"What is Needed to Support Non-Urban Urology in the United States? Perspectives from Urologists in Rural and Underresourced Areas.","authors":"Kathleen Kieran, Candace Granberg, Christopher Deibert, Arthur L Burnett, Paul H Chung","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000741","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000741","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Twenty percent of Americans live in non-urban areas, and the challenges in providing high-quality health care in rural areas are well described. These challenges are further exacerbated by the fact that rural citizens are often older and sicker than their urban colleagues, as well as by the ongoing workforce shortage in urology. This study aims to describe the current practice experiences of non-metropolitan urologists (NMUs) in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the results of the 2022 American Urological Association Census, a secondary questionnaire was developed and distributed electronically to urologists who self-identified in the Census as practicing in non-metropolitan areas. Multiple choice answers were summarized as proportions and free-text answers were collected and grouped by theme.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and thirteen of 552 (20.5%) urologists responded. Most respondents were male (92.9%), aged >55 years (76.1%), in practice >25 years, and in solo practice (25.5%) or a subspecialty group (20.8%). Stressors for NMUs included recruitment (61.3%), call concerns (59.3%), workforce issues (59.3%), difficulty interacting with tertiary medical centers (45.1%), and lack of resources (40.7%). Nearly half of respondents (48.5%) experience burnout more than once monthly, and 31.9% anticipate continuing their current practice and pace for the next five years. Call burden is the most likely reason to leave practice (40%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most urologists practicing in non-metropolitan areas are older, endorse high rates of burnout, and have active plans to leave or decrease practice within five years. Understanding contemporary stressors can inform policies to support current and future NMUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"101097UPJ0000000000000741"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142569377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring Recent Changes to the New Urology Residency Match. 探索新泌尿科住院医生匹配的最新变化。
IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-28 DOI: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000645
Armando Alvarez-Suarez, Spencer Shain, Juan Sebastian Rodriguez-Alvarez, Carlos Munoz-Lopez, Andre F Miranda, Steven J Hudak, Steven C Campbell, Molly E Dewitt-Foy, Justin Han, Roger K Khouri

Introduction: This study assesses the effects of the recent changes to the urology residency match process.

Methods: We emailed an anonymous, multiple-choice survey to each candidate who applied to any of our 3 urology programs for the 2024 Urology Residency Match.

Results: Of the 433 candidates invited, 146 (33.7%) completed the survey. Of the 133 respondents who matched, 38.3% matched where they did an away subinternship (sub-I), 20.3% matched with their home program, and 91.0% matched with a program where they sent a preference signal (PS); only 8 respondents (6.0%) matched with a program where they did not complete a sub-I or send a PS. Of the 4 candidates who did not take Step 2 before submitting their application, only 1 matched. The 126 applicants who completed 3 or more sub-Is, including the home sub-I, had a higher match rate (95.2%) than the 20 applicants who completed 1 or 2 (65.0%, P < .0005). Disclosing any geographic preferences was associated with a decreased probability of matching (relative risk = 0.89, P < .05).

Conclusions: Taking Step 2 before submitting applications and completing 3 or more sub-Is were both correlated with a higher match rate. Geographic signaling was correlated with a lower match rate. There was little benefit to applying to programs outside of those where the applicant had completed a sub-I or sent a PS. Future candidates should consider these findings early in the application process. These findings should be taken into consideration when making future changes to the application process.

导言:本研究评估了近期泌尿外科住院医师匹配程序变化的影响:我们通过电子邮件向申请参加 2024 年泌尿外科住院医师配对的 3 个泌尿外科项目中的任何一个的每位候选人发送了一份匿名多选题调查:在受邀的 433 名候选人中,有 146 人(33.7%)完成了调查。在 133 位完成匹配的受访者中,38.3% 的受访者完成了客场实习(sub-I),20.3% 的受访者完成了母校项目的匹配,91.0% 的受访者完成了发出偏好信号(PS)的项目匹配;只有 8 位受访者(6.0%)完成了未完成 sub-I 或未发出 PS 的项目匹配。在递交申请前未完成步骤 2 的 4 名申请人中,只有 1 人与之匹配。完成 3 个或 3 个以上子 I(包括家庭子 I)的 126 名申请人的匹配率(95.2%)高于只完成 1 个或 2 个子 I 的 20 名申请人(65.0%,P < .0005)。披露任何地域偏好都会降低匹配概率(相对风险 = 0.89,P < .05):结论:在提交申请前采取步骤 2 和完成 3 个或 3 个以上子项目都与较高的匹配率有关。地域信号与较低的匹配率相关。如果申请者没有完成 Sub-I 或发送 PS,那么申请其他项目的益处不大。未来的候选人应该在申请过程中尽早考虑这些发现。未来对申请流程进行修改时,也应考虑这些发现。
{"title":"Exploring Recent Changes to the New Urology Residency Match.","authors":"Armando Alvarez-Suarez, Spencer Shain, Juan Sebastian Rodriguez-Alvarez, Carlos Munoz-Lopez, Andre F Miranda, Steven J Hudak, Steven C Campbell, Molly E Dewitt-Foy, Justin Han, Roger K Khouri","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000645","DOIUrl":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000645","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study assesses the effects of the recent changes to the urology residency match process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We emailed an anonymous, multiple-choice survey to each candidate who applied to any of our 3 urology programs for the 2024 Urology Residency Match.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 433 candidates invited, 146 (33.7%) completed the survey. Of the 133 respondents who matched, 38.3% matched where they did an away subinternship (sub-I), 20.3% matched with their home program, and 91.0% matched with a program where they sent a preference signal (PS); only 8 respondents (6.0%) matched with a program where they did not complete a sub-I or send a PS. Of the 4 candidates who did not take Step 2 before submitting their application, only 1 matched. The 126 applicants who completed 3 or more sub-Is, including the home sub-I, had a higher match rate (95.2%) than the 20 applicants who completed 1 or 2 (65.0%, <i>P</i> < .0005). Disclosing any geographic preferences was associated with a decreased probability of matching (relative risk = 0.89, <i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Taking Step 2 before submitting applications and completing 3 or more sub-Is were both correlated with a higher match rate. Geographic signaling was correlated with a lower match rate. There was little benefit to applying to programs outside of those where the applicant had completed a sub-I or sent a PS. Future candidates should consider these findings early in the application process. These findings should be taken into consideration when making future changes to the application process.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"999-1005"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142086360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementation and Interim Analysis of a Standardized Renal Trauma Imaging and Urinary Extravasation Management Protocol. 标准化肾创伤成像和尿外渗管理规程的实施和中期分析。
IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000669
Leah Chisholm, George E Koch, Jennifer J Huang, Rohan G Bhalla, Abimbola Ayangbesan, William J Walton, Bradley M Dennis, Oscar Guillamondegui, Niels V Johnsen

Introduction: The AUA recommends delayed-phase imaging (DPI) in renal injuries to evaluate the collecting system. A renal trauma imaging protocol for early conservative management of urinary extravasation (UE) was implemented to improve guideline adherence. We aimed to determine if increased adherence led to changes in outcomes.

Methods: Patients with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma III to V renal injury presenting from January 2018 to September 2022 were identified from an institutional trauma registry. Patients were included if a contrasted CT scan of the abdomen was obtained on admission. Frequency of DPI and patient outcomes were compared before and after protocol implementation.

Results: Of 223 included patients, 131 (58.7%) were pre protocol and 92 (41.3%) were post protocol. Following protocol implementation, the rate of DPI on admission nearly doubled from 32.8% to 58.7% (P < .001). The rate of follow-up cross-sectional imaging increased from 18.3% to 58.7% (P < .001). Although there were no significant differences in rates of immediate or delayed interventions following protocol implementation, the postprotocol immediate intervention rate did decrease to 0%. Readmissions due to symptomatic UE were unchanged after protocol implementation (0.0% vs 0.0%).

Conclusions: Implementation of a multidisciplinary renal trauma early imaging and management protocol improved AUA guideline adherence. With protocol adherence, there was also an elimination of immediate interventions for UE. Despite decreases in early intervention, there was no significant increase in interval interventions or UE-related readmissions. More research is needed to determine the role for routine follow-up imaging in conservative management of high-grade renal trauma.

简介:AUA 建议对肾损伤进行延迟相位成像 (DPI) 以评估集尿系统。为了更好地遵守指南,我们实施了一项肾创伤成像方案,用于早期保守治疗尿液外渗(UE)。我们的目的是确定遵守率的提高是否会导致结果的改变:从机构创伤登记处确定了 2018 年 1 月至 2022 年 9 月期间出现美国创伤外科协会 III 至 V 级肾损伤的患者。如果患者在入院时进行了腹部造影 CT 扫描,则将其纳入研究范围。对方案实施前后的DPI频率和患者预后进行了比较:在纳入的 223 例患者中,131 例(58.7%)为协议实施前患者,92 例(41.3%)为协议实施后患者。方案实施后,入院时的 DPI 率几乎翻了一番,从 32.8% 增加到 58.7%(P < .001)。随访横断面成像率从 18.3% 增加到 58.7%(P < .001)。虽然协议实施后立即干预率和延迟干预率没有明显差异,但协议实施后立即干预率确实降至 0%。协议实施后,无症状尿毒症导致的再入院率保持不变(0.0% vs 0.0%):结论:实施多学科肾创伤早期成像和管理方案提高了AUA指南的依从性。结论:多学科肾创伤早期成像和管理规范的实施提高了AUA指南的遵循率,同时也减少了对UE的即时干预。尽管早期干预有所减少,但间隔干预或与尿毒症相关的再入院率并没有显著增加。要确定常规随访成像在高位肾创伤保守治疗中的作用,还需要更多的研究。
{"title":"Implementation and Interim Analysis of a Standardized Renal Trauma Imaging and Urinary Extravasation Management Protocol.","authors":"Leah Chisholm, George E Koch, Jennifer J Huang, Rohan G Bhalla, Abimbola Ayangbesan, William J Walton, Bradley M Dennis, Oscar Guillamondegui, Niels V Johnsen","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000669","DOIUrl":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000669","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The AUA recommends delayed-phase imaging (DPI) in renal injuries to evaluate the collecting system. A renal trauma imaging protocol for early conservative management of urinary extravasation (UE) was implemented to improve guideline adherence. We aimed to determine if increased adherence led to changes in outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma III to V renal injury presenting from January 2018 to September 2022 were identified from an institutional trauma registry. Patients were included if a contrasted CT scan of the abdomen was obtained on admission. Frequency of DPI and patient outcomes were compared before and after protocol implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 223 included patients, 131 (58.7%) were pre protocol and 92 (41.3%) were post protocol. Following protocol implementation, the rate of DPI on admission nearly doubled from 32.8% to 58.7% (<i>P</i> < .001). The rate of follow-up cross-sectional imaging increased from 18.3% to 58.7% (<i>P</i> < .001). Although there were no significant differences in rates of immediate or delayed interventions following protocol implementation, the postprotocol immediate intervention rate did decrease to 0%. Readmissions due to symptomatic UE were unchanged after protocol implementation (0.0% vs 0.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of a multidisciplinary renal trauma early imaging and management protocol improved AUA guideline adherence. With protocol adherence, there was also an elimination of immediate interventions for UE. Despite decreases in early intervention, there was no significant increase in interval interventions or UE-related readmissions. More research is needed to determine the role for routine follow-up imaging in conservative management of high-grade renal trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"957-963"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142086363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Wesley Adam Mayer, MD. 本月泌尿外科实践评论员。
IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000680
Wesley Adam Mayer
{"title":"Wesley Adam Mayer, MD.","authors":"Wesley Adam Mayer","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000680","DOIUrl":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000680","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"918-919"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142086326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial Commentary. 社论评论。
IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000651
Delaney J Orcutt, Kristen R Scarpato
{"title":"Editorial Commentary.","authors":"Delaney J Orcutt, Kristen R Scarpato","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000651","DOIUrl":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000651","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1004-1005"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142086348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reply by Authors. 作者回复。
IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-17 DOI: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000682
Courtney Yong, Alexander Kim, James E Slaven, Ronald S Boris, Chandru P Sundaram
{"title":"Reply by Authors.","authors":"Courtney Yong, Alexander Kim, James E Slaven, Ronald S Boris, Chandru P Sundaram","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000682","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000682","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":"11 6","pages":"997"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142486209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Urology Practice
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1