首页 > 最新文献

FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA最新文献

英文 中文
[Artículo traducido] Administración de broncodilatadores mediante inhalador de dosis medida durante la ventilación mecánica invasiva: una revisión sistemática exploratoria 成人有创机械通气期间使用加压吸入器给予支气管扩张剂:范围综述。
IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2024.08.006
Kathleen Asturian, Mariana Balhego-Rocha, Diogo Pilger

Objective

To identify the administration characteristics and connection methods of bronchodilators by pressurized inhalers to the ventilatory circuit of patients under invasive mechanical ventilation.

Methods

A scope review was conducted following the PRISMA for Scoping Review, using the PubMed, Embase Elsevier, Cochrane Library, and Lilacs databases without language restrictions, up to July 2023. Eligible sources included reviews and consensuses (based on clinical studies), experimental and observational studies involving adult patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit and undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation, regardless of the underlying condition, who used bronchodilator drugs contained in pressurized inhalers. Information regarding inhalation technique, pressurized inhalers connection mode to the circuit, and patient care were collected by two researchers independently, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Studies involving bronchodilators combined with other pharmacological classes in the same device, as well as reviews containing preclinical studies, were excluded.

Results

In total, 23 publications were included, comprising 19 clinical trials and 4 non-randomized experimental studies. Salbutamol (albuterol) was the bronchodilator of study in the majority of the articles (n = 18), and the spacer device was the most commonly used to connect the pressurized inhaler to the circuit (n = 15), followed by an in-line adapter (n = 3) and a direct-acting device without chamber (n = 3). Concerning the pressurized inhaler placement in the circuit, 18 studies positioned it in the inspiratory limb, and 19 studies synchronized the jet actuation with the start of the inspiratory phase. Agitation of the pressurized inhaler before each actuation, waiting time between actuations, airway suction before administration, and semi-recumbent patient positioning were the most commonly described measures across the studies.

Conclusions

This review provided insights into the aspects related to inhalation technique in mechanically ventilated patients, as well as the most prevalent findings and the existing gaps in knowledge regarding bronchodilator administration in this context. The evidence indicates the need for further research on this subject.
目的确定支气管扩张剂通过加压吸入器进入有创机械通气患者通气回路的给药特点和连接方法:方法:按照范围界定审查的 PRISMA 标准,使用 PubMed、Embase Elsevier、Cochrane Library 和 Lilacs 数据库进行范围界定审查,无语言限制,截至 2023 年 7 月。符合条件的资料来源包括综述和共识(基于临床研究)、实验和观察性研究,这些研究涉及入住重症监护病房并接受有创机械通气的成年患者,无论其基础疾病如何,均使用了加压吸入器中的支气管扩张剂药物。有关吸入技术、加压吸入器与回路的连接模式以及患者护理的信息由两名研究人员独立收集,不一致之处由第三名审查员解决。涉及同一装置中支气管扩张剂与其他药理类别结合的研究以及包含临床前研究的综述均被排除在外:结果:共纳入 23 篇文献,包括 19 项临床试验和 4 项非随机实验研究。大多数文章(18 篇)研究的支气管扩张剂是沙丁胺醇(阿布特罗),最常用的是将加压吸入器连接到回路的间隔装置(15 篇),其次是在线适配器(3 篇)和无腔直接作用装置(3 篇)。关于加压吸入器在回路中的位置,18 项研究将其置于吸气肢,19 项研究将喷射启动与吸气阶段的开始同步。每次启动前对加压吸入器的搅拌、启动之间的等待时间、给药前的气道吸引以及半卧位患者体位是所有研究中最常描述的措施:本综述深入探讨了与机械通气患者吸入技术相关的各个方面,以及在这种情况下支气管扩张剂给药方面最普遍的发现和现有的知识差距。有证据表明,有必要就这一主题开展进一步研究。
{"title":"[Artículo traducido] Administración de broncodilatadores mediante inhalador de dosis medida durante la ventilación mecánica invasiva: una revisión sistemática exploratoria","authors":"Kathleen Asturian,&nbsp;Mariana Balhego-Rocha,&nbsp;Diogo Pilger","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.08.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.08.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify the administration characteristics and connection methods of bronchodilators by pressurized inhalers to the ventilatory circuit of patients under invasive mechanical ventilation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A scope review was conducted following the PRISMA for Scoping Review, using the PubMed, Embase Elsevier, Cochrane Library, and Lilacs databases without language restrictions, up to July 2023. Eligible sources included reviews and consensuses (based on clinical studies), experimental and observational studies involving adult patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit and undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation, regardless of the underlying condition, who used bronchodilator drugs contained in pressurized inhalers. Information regarding inhalation technique, pressurized inhalers connection mode to the circuit, and patient care were collected by two researchers independently, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Studies involving bronchodilators combined with other pharmacological classes in the same device, as well as reviews containing preclinical studies, were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 23 publications were included, comprising 19 clinical trials and 4 non-randomized experimental studies. Salbutamol (albuterol) was the bronchodilator of study in the majority of the articles (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->18), and the spacer device was the most commonly used to connect the pressurized inhaler to the circuit (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->15), followed by an in-line adapter (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->3) and a direct-acting device without chamber (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->3). Concerning the pressurized inhaler placement in the circuit, 18 studies positioned it in the inspiratory limb, and 19 studies synchronized the jet actuation with the start of the inspiratory phase. Agitation of the pressurized inhaler before each actuation, waiting time between actuations, airway suction before administration, and semi-recumbent patient positioning were the most commonly described measures across the studies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This review provided insights into the aspects related to inhalation technique in mechanically ventilated patients, as well as the most prevalent findings and the existing gaps in knowledge regarding bronchodilator administration in this context. The evidence indicates the need for further research on this subject.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":"49 1","pages":"Pages T53-T58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Translated article] Prioritisation of 2024–2027 initiatives of the strategic Map for outpatient pharmaceutical care of the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy [西班牙医院药剂师协会门诊药物护理战略地图 2024-2027 年倡议的优先次序。
IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2024.08.003
Ramón Morillo Verdugo , Beatriz Bernardez Ferrán , Aurora Fernández Polo , Luis Margusino Framiñan , José Manuel Martínez Sesmero , Manuel Vélez-Díaz-Pallarés , Esther Vicente-Escrig

Objective

To prioritise the initiatives to be developed for the development of the Strategic Map of Outpatient Care (MAPEX) project to improve the quality of care and pharmaceutical care for patients seen in hospital pharmacy outpatient clinics in the period 2024–2027 in Spain.

Method

The study was carried out in 4 phases between January and December 2023.
For phase 1, a literature review of the evolution of the project was carried out by the coordinating committee with the aim of establishing a basis on which to define a new proposal for initiatives. In addition, an analysis was made of the health trends that will have an impact in the coming years.
In phase 2, a working group of 19 specialists from all the autonomous communities was created, who were called regional ambassadors. They all made a preliminary proposal of initiatives and established revisions for their adjustment and final version both online and in telematic meetings.
In phase 3, a consensus was established based on the Delphi-Rand/UCLA methodology with 2 rounds of online voting to select the initiatives classified as: priority and key or breakthrough.
Between the first and second round of voting, a face-to-face “Consensus Conference” was held, where the results of the first round were presented.
In phase 4, a public presentation was made in scientific forums and through the web.

Results

Ten trends in the health sector were identified. A list of 34 initiatives grouped into 5 lines of work was established. A total of 103 panellists participated in the first round and 76 in the second. Finally, 5 initiatives were established as priority and 29 as key. Among those prioritised were external visibility, adaptations to the CMO methodology, strengthening certification, and improving training.

Conclusions

The initiatives agreed upon as priorities were aimed at improving professional visibility, broadening the methodology of care work, expanding the quality of care, enhancing the training of professionals, and the voice of patients.
目标:为制定门诊病人护理战略地图(MAPEX)项目确定优先举措,以改善 2024-2027 年期间西班牙医院药房门诊病人的护理和药物护理质量:研究在 2023 年 1 月至 12 月期间分 4 个阶段进行。在第 1 阶段,协调委员会对该项目的发展历程进行了文献回顾,目的是为确定新的倡议提案奠定基础。此外,还对未来几年将产生影响的健康趋势进行了分析。在第二阶段,成立了一个由来自所有自治区的 19 名专家组成的工作组,他们被称为地区大使。他们都提出了初步的倡议建议,并在网上和远程会议上对其进行调整和定稿。在第三阶段,根据德尔菲-兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校的方法达成共识,通过两轮在线投 票选出优先、关键或突破性倡议。在第一轮和第二轮投票之间,举行了一次面对面的 "共识会议",会上介绍了第一轮投票的结果。在第四阶段,通过科学论坛和网络进行了公开展示:结果:确定了卫生领域的十大趋势。结果:确定了卫生领域的十大趋势,并将 34 项倡议分为 5 个工作重点。共有 103 名小组成员参加了第一轮讨论,76 人参加了第二轮讨论。最后,确定了 5 项优先举措和 29 项关键举措。其中,外部能见度、调整 CMO 方法、加强认证和改进培训被列为优先事项:结论:商定的优先举措旨在提高专业知名度、拓宽护理工作方法、提高护理质量、加强专业人员培训以及听取患者的意见。
{"title":"[Translated article] Prioritisation of 2024–2027 initiatives of the strategic Map for outpatient pharmaceutical care of the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy","authors":"Ramón Morillo Verdugo ,&nbsp;Beatriz Bernardez Ferrán ,&nbsp;Aurora Fernández Polo ,&nbsp;Luis Margusino Framiñan ,&nbsp;José Manuel Martínez Sesmero ,&nbsp;Manuel Vélez-Díaz-Pallarés ,&nbsp;Esther Vicente-Escrig","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.08.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.08.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To prioritise the initiatives to be developed for the development of the Strategic Map of Outpatient Care (MAPEX) project to improve the quality of care and pharmaceutical care for patients seen in hospital pharmacy outpatient clinics in the period 2024–2027 in Spain.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The study was carried out in 4 phases between January and December 2023.</div><div>For phase 1, a literature review of the evolution of the project was carried out by the coordinating committee with the aim of establishing a basis on which to define a new proposal for initiatives. In addition, an analysis was made of the health trends that will have an impact in the coming years.</div><div>In phase 2, a working group of 19 specialists from all the autonomous communities was created, who were called regional ambassadors. They all made a preliminary proposal of initiatives and established revisions for their adjustment and final version both online and in telematic meetings.</div><div>In phase 3, a consensus was established based on the Delphi-Rand/UCLA methodology with 2 rounds of online voting to select the initiatives classified as: priority and key or breakthrough.</div><div>Between the first and second round of voting, a face-to-face “Consensus Conference” was held, where the results of the first round were presented.</div><div>In phase 4, a public presentation was made in scientific forums and through the web.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ten trends in the health sector were identified. A list of 34 initiatives grouped into 5 lines of work was established. A total of 103 panellists participated in the first round and 76 in the second. Finally, 5 initiatives were established as priority and 29 as key. Among those prioritised were external visibility, adaptations to the CMO methodology, strengthening certification, and improving training.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The initiatives agreed upon as priorities were aimed at improving professional visibility, broadening the methodology of care work, expanding the quality of care, enhancing the training of professionals, and the voice of patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":"49 1","pages":"Pages T3-T10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142373202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conocimiento de la terapia biológica en pacientes con enfermedades inmunomediadas. Estudio BIOINFO 免疫介导疾病患者的生物疗法知识。BIOINFO 研究。
IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2024.04.007
Carlos Seguí-Solanes , Lidia Estrada , Esther Ramírez Herráiz , Silvia Ruiz-García , Tomás Palanques-Pastor , Vicente Merino Bohórquez , Cristina Capilla Montes , Joaquín Borras-Blasco

Objective

To determine the degree of knowledge about biological therapy and biosimilars in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases treated in Outpatient Pharmaceutical Care Units.

Methods

Observational, prospective and multicenter study during the period May 2020-March 2021. A survey (9 questions) was conducted before starting treatment in which the patients' level of knowledge about biological therapy and biosimilars was assessed.

Results

A total of 169 patients were included in the study. The average value for the different questions was 3.3 ± 0.6 out of 5, while the average final result was 29.4 points out of 45. Sixty-four percent of the patients had an acceptable level before starting the medication (>27 points). The multivariate analysis showed a statistically significant correlation (p < 0.05) with a better score at the beginning of treatment in those patients whose prescribing service was Rheumatology.

Conclusions

In general, the level of knowledge prior to biological therapy in patients is acceptable, being higher in dosage and administration technique related-factors and what is related to the dosage and administration technique and where to find information related to the medication; the worst rated were those on biosimilars-related. The factor of being followed by rheumatology, was associated with better knowledge.
目的确定在门诊医药护理病房接受治疗的免疫介导炎症性疾病患者对生物疗法和生物仿制药的了解程度:2020年5月至2021年3月期间的观察性、前瞻性和多中心研究。在开始治疗前进行一项调查(9 个问题),评估患者对生物疗法和生物仿制药的了解程度:结果:共有 169 名患者参与了研究。不同问题的平均值为 3.3 ± 0.6(满分 5 分),最终平均结果为 29.4 分(满分 45 分)。64%的患者在开始服药前的血糖水平为可接受水平(>27 分)。多变量分析表明,两者之间存在统计学意义上的显著相关性(p 结论:总体而言,患者在接受生物治疗前的知识水平是可以接受的,但在剂量和给药技术相关因素、剂量和给药技术相关内容以及在哪里可以找到与药物相关的信息方面的知识水平较高;评分最差的是与生物仿制药相关的知识。由风湿病学专家跟踪服务这一因素与更好的知识有关。
{"title":"Conocimiento de la terapia biológica en pacientes con enfermedades inmunomediadas. Estudio BIOINFO","authors":"Carlos Seguí-Solanes ,&nbsp;Lidia Estrada ,&nbsp;Esther Ramírez Herráiz ,&nbsp;Silvia Ruiz-García ,&nbsp;Tomás Palanques-Pastor ,&nbsp;Vicente Merino Bohórquez ,&nbsp;Cristina Capilla Montes ,&nbsp;Joaquín Borras-Blasco","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.04.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.04.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the degree of knowledge about biological therapy and biosimilars in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases treated in Outpatient Pharmaceutical Care Units.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Observational, prospective and multicenter study during the period May 2020-March 2021. A survey (9 questions) was conducted before starting treatment in which the patients' level of knowledge about biological therapy and biosimilars was assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 169 patients were included in the study. The average value for the different questions was 3.3 ± 0.6 out of 5, while the average final result was 29.4 points out of 45. Sixty-four percent of the patients had an acceptable level before starting the medication (&gt;27 points). The multivariate analysis showed a statistically significant correlation (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) with a better score at the beginning of treatment in those patients whose prescribing service was Rheumatology.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In general, the level of knowledge prior to biological therapy in patients is acceptable, being higher in dosage and administration technique related-factors and what is related to the dosage and administration technique and where to find information related to the medication; the worst rated were those on biosimilars-related. The factor of being followed by rheumatology, was associated with better knowledge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":"49 1","pages":"Pages 32-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141284994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Translated article] The challenge of the generational gap [译文]代沟的挑战。
IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2025.01.001
Eva Negro-Vega , Covadonga Pérez Menéndez-Conde
{"title":"[Translated article] The challenge of the generational gap","authors":"Eva Negro-Vega ,&nbsp;Covadonga Pérez Menéndez-Conde","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.farma.2025.01.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":"49 1","pages":"Pages T1-T2"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143013850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
El reto de la convivencia generacional 代沟的挑战。
IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2024.12.005
Eva Negro-Vega , Covadonga Pérez Menéndez-Conde
{"title":"El reto de la convivencia generacional","authors":"Eva Negro-Vega ,&nbsp;Covadonga Pérez Menéndez-Conde","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.12.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.12.005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":"49 1","pages":"Pages 1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Medidas de resultados comunicados por el paciente para evaluar la dermatitis atópica 用于在临床实践中评估特应性皮炎的患者报告结果指标。
IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2023.11.002
Gabriel Mercadal-Orfila , Carlos Seguí-Solanes , Nuria Rudi-Sola , Maria Eugenia Escriva-Sancho , Rosa Taberner-Ferrer
Atopic dermatitis is a chronic skin condition that affects up to 20% of children and 10% of adults worldwide. Due to the high burden of dermatological signs and symptoms, atopic dermatitis has a significant impact on the quality of life of patients and their families. In the absence of objective measures to accurately assess severity and symptom burden, patient-reported outcome measures are essential to monitor the impact and progression of the disease, as well as the efficacy of treatments. Although there are currently no standardised guidelines for their use in clinical practice, there are some initiatives, such as the Harmonise Outcome Measures for Eczema and Vivir con Dermatitis Atópica, that can provide guidance. As healthcare systems move towards value-based healthcare models, patient-reported measures are becoming increasingly important for incorporating the patient perspective and improving the quality of healthcare services. The use of these measures can help monitor disease activity and guide treatment decisions. This article discusses the impact of atopic dermatitis and describes the patient-reported outcome measures commonly used in atopic dermatitis and the recommendations of the initiatives that have selected a core set of measures to best assess atopic dermatitis in clinical practice. Considering the recommendations of these initiatives and based on our experience in clinical practice, we propose the use of the Dermatology Life Quality Index to assess the impact of the disease on quality of life, the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure to assess symptom severity, and the Numerical Rating Scale or the Visual Analogue Scale to measure itch intensity. To systematize the administration of these measures and to integrate them into hospital information systems and medical records, we emphasise the importance of telemedicine platforms that allow the electronic administration of these instruments.
特应性皮炎是一种慢性皮肤病,全世界有多达 20% 的儿童和 10% 的成年人患有这种疾病。由于特应性皮炎的皮肤症状和体征较多,因此对患者及其家人的生活质量有很大影响。由于缺乏准确评估严重程度和症状负担的客观测量方法,患者报告的结果测量对于监测疾病的影响和进展以及治疗效果至关重要。虽然目前还没有在临床实践中使用这些方法的标准化指南,但一些倡议,如 "湿疹结果衡量标准协调 "和 "湿疹患者的生活",可以提供指导。随着医疗保健系统向以价值为基础的医疗保健模式转变,患者报告的衡量标准在纳入患者观点和提高医疗保健服务质量方面变得越来越重要。使用这些指标有助于监测疾病活动并指导治疗决策。本文讨论了特应性皮炎的影响,介绍了特应性皮炎常用的患者报告结果测量方法,以及为在临床实践中更好地评估特应性皮炎而选择了一套核心测量方法的倡议建议。考虑到这些倡议的建议,并根据我们在临床实践中的经验,我们建议使用皮肤科生活质量指数(Dermatology Life Quality Index)来评估疾病对生活质量的影响,使用以患者为导向的湿疹测量法(Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure)来评估症状的严重程度,使用数字评定量表(Numerical Rating Scale)或视觉模拟量表(Visual Analogue Scale)来测量瘙痒强度。为了使这些测量方法的实施系统化,并将其纳入医院信息系统和医疗记录,我们强调了远程医疗平台的重要性,该平台允许以电子方式实施这些工具。
{"title":"Medidas de resultados comunicados por el paciente para evaluar la dermatitis atópica","authors":"Gabriel Mercadal-Orfila ,&nbsp;Carlos Seguí-Solanes ,&nbsp;Nuria Rudi-Sola ,&nbsp;Maria Eugenia Escriva-Sancho ,&nbsp;Rosa Taberner-Ferrer","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2023.11.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.farma.2023.11.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Atopic dermatitis is a chronic skin condition that affects up to 20% of children and 10% of adults worldwide. Due to the high burden of dermatological signs and symptoms, atopic dermatitis has a significant impact on the quality of life of patients and their families. In the absence of objective measures to accurately assess severity and symptom burden, patient-reported outcome measures are essential to monitor the impact and progression of the disease, as well as the efficacy of treatments. Although there are currently no standardised guidelines for their use in clinical practice, there are some initiatives, such as the Harmonise Outcome Measures for Eczema and <em>Vivir con Dermatitis Atópica</em>, that can provide guidance. As healthcare systems move towards value-based healthcare models, patient-reported measures are becoming increasingly important for incorporating the patient perspective and improving the quality of healthcare services. The use of these measures can help monitor disease activity and guide treatment decisions. This article discusses the impact of atopic dermatitis and describes the patient-reported outcome measures commonly used in atopic dermatitis and the recommendations of the initiatives that have selected a core set of measures to best assess atopic dermatitis in clinical practice. Considering the recommendations of these initiatives and based on our experience in clinical practice, we propose the use of the Dermatology Life Quality Index to assess the impact of the disease on quality of life, the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure to assess symptom severity, and the Numerical Rating Scale or the Visual Analogue Scale to measure itch intensity. To systematize the administration of these measures and to integrate them into hospital information systems and medical records, we emphasise the importance of telemedicine platforms that allow the electronic administration of these instruments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":"49 1","pages":"Pages 37-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141162580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conciliación de la medicación en el paciente hematológico ingresado 住院血液病患者的用药协调。
IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2024.04.004
Alejandro Sanjuán Belda , María Vuelta Arce , Jorge del Estal Jiménez , Laura Canadell Vilarrasa

Objective

The main objective was to analyze unjustified discrepancies during the medication reconciliation process in patients admitted to the Hematology Service of our hospital and the pharmaceutical interventions. As a secondary objective, to detect possible points of the procedure to be perfected with a view to protocolizing the medication reconciliation process in hematological patients that adapts to the conditions of our center.

Methods

Cross-sectional observational pilot study carried out in a reference hospital in hematology for a population of 800,000 inhabitants. Adult inpatients admitted to the Hematology Service between August and October 2022 whose medication had been reconciled were included. The main variables were: number and type of unjustified discrepancy, proposed pharmaceutical intervention, and acceptance rate.

Results

36 conciliation processes were analyzed, 34 admissions and 2 intrahospital transfer. 58.3% of the patients presented at least one unjustified discrepancy. 38 unjustified discrepancies were detected, with an acceptance of pharmaceutical interventions of 97.4%. The most common types of discrepancy were medication omission (56.8%) and drug interaction (24.3%). The most frequent pharmaceutical interventions were reintroducing medication (48.6%) and treatment discontinuation (16.2%). Polypharmacy and chemotherapy multiplied by 4 the probability of presenting drug interactions.

Conclusions

The most common unjustified discrepancies in the medication reconciliation process in hospitalized hematology patients are: Medication omission and drug interactions. The reintroduction of medication and suspension of the prescription are the most frequent accepted pharmaceutical interventions. Polypharmacy is related to an increase in unjustified discrepancies. The factors that promote the appearance of interactions are admissions to receive chemotherapy treatment and polypharmacy. The main point of improvement detected is the need to create a circuit that allows conciliation to be carried out on discharge. Medication reconciliation contribute to improving patient safety by reducing medication errors.
目的主要目的是分析我院血液科住院患者在药物调节过程中出现的不合理差异以及药物干预措施。次要目的是发现有待完善的程序要点,以便根据本中心的条件对血液病患者的用药核对程序进行规范:方法:在一家血液科参考医院进行横断面观察试点研究,该医院的人口为 80 万。研究对象包括 2022 年 8 月至 10 月期间血液科收治的成人住院病人,这些病人的用药均已核对。主要变量包括:不合理差异的数量和类型、建议的药物干预措施以及接受率:结果:分析了36个调解过程,其中34个入院,2个院内转院。58.3%的患者至少出现过一次不合理差异。共发现 38 项不合理差异,接受药物干预的比例为 97.4%。最常见的差异类型是药物遗漏(56.8%)和药物相互作用(24.3%)。最常见的药物干预是重新用药(48.6%)和停止治疗(16.2%)。多药治疗和化疗使出现药物相互作用的概率增加了4倍:结论:在住院血液病患者的药物调节过程中,最常见的不合理差异是药物遗漏和药物相互作用:药物遗漏和药物相互作用。重新用药和暂停处方是最常见的药物干预措施。多重用药与不合理差异的增加有关。促进药物相互作用出现的因素是入院接受化疗和多药治疗。发现的主要改进点是需要建立一个回路,以便在出院时进行调解。通过减少用药错误,用药协调有助于提高患者的安全。
{"title":"Conciliación de la medicación en el paciente hematológico ingresado","authors":"Alejandro Sanjuán Belda ,&nbsp;María Vuelta Arce ,&nbsp;Jorge del Estal Jiménez ,&nbsp;Laura Canadell Vilarrasa","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.04.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.04.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The main objective was to analyze unjustified discrepancies during the medication reconciliation process in patients admitted to the Hematology Service of our hospital and the pharmaceutical interventions. As a secondary objective, to detect possible points of the procedure to be perfected with a view to protocolizing the medication reconciliation process in hematological patients that adapts to the conditions of our center.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional observational pilot study carried out in a reference hospital in hematology for a population of 800,000 inhabitants. Adult inpatients admitted to the Hematology Service between August and October 2022 whose medication had been reconciled were included. The main variables were: number and type of unjustified discrepancy, proposed pharmaceutical intervention, and acceptance rate.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>36 conciliation processes were analyzed, 34 admissions and 2 intrahospital transfer. 58.3% of the patients presented at least one unjustified discrepancy. 38 unjustified discrepancies were detected, with an acceptance of pharmaceutical interventions of 97.4%. The most common types of discrepancy were medication omission (56.8%) and drug interaction (24.3%). The most frequent pharmaceutical interventions were reintroducing medication (48.6%) and treatment discontinuation (16.2%). Polypharmacy and chemotherapy multiplied by 4 the probability of presenting drug interactions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The most common unjustified discrepancies in the medication reconciliation process in hospitalized hematology patients are: Medication omission and drug interactions. The reintroduction of medication and suspension of the prescription are the most frequent accepted pharmaceutical interventions. Polypharmacy is related to an increase in unjustified discrepancies. The factors that promote the appearance of interactions are admissions to receive chemotherapy treatment and polypharmacy. The main point of improvement detected is the need to create a circuit that allows conciliation to be carried out on discharge. Medication reconciliation contribute to improving patient safety by reducing medication errors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":"49 1","pages":"Pages 11-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141162611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Translated article] Medication reconciliation in hospitalized haematological patients [译文]住院血液病患者的用药协调。
IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2024.08.007
Alejandro Sanjuán Belda , María Vuelta Arce , Jorge del Estal Jiménez , Laura Canadell Vilarrasa

Objective

The main objective is to analyse unjustified discrepancies found during the medication reconciliation process in patients admitted to the Haematology Service of our hospital, in addition to the pharmaceutical interventions carried out. As a secondary objective, to detect possible points of the procedure to be perfected with a view to protocolizing the medication reconciliation process in haematological patients that adapts to the conditions of our center.

Methods

Cross-sectional observational pilot study carried out in a reference hospital in haematology for a population of 800 000 inhabitants. Adult inpatients admitted to the Haematology Service between August and October 2022 whose medication had been reconciled were included. The main variables were: number and type of unjustified discrepancy, proposed pharmaceutical intervention, and degree of acceptance.

Results

36 conciliation processes were analysed, 34 admissions and 2 intrahospital transfer. 58.3% of the patients presented some unjustified discrepancy. 38 unjustified discrepancies were detected, with an acceptance of pharmaceutical interventions of 97.4%. The most common types of discrepancy were medication omission (56.8%) and drug interaction (24.3%). The most frequent pharmaceutical interventions were reintroducing medication (48.6%) and suspending treatment (16.2%). Polypharmacy and receiving chemotherapy treatment multiply by 4 the probability of presenting drug interactions.

Conclusions

The most common unjustified discrepancies in the medication reconciliation process in hospitalized haematology patients are: medication omission and drug interactions. The reintroduction of medication and suspension of the prescription are the most frequent accepted pharmaceutical interventions. Polypharmacy is related to an increase in unjustified discrepancies. The factors that promote the appearance of interactions are admissions to receive chemotherapy treatment and polypharmacy. The main point of improvement detected is the need to create a circuit that allows conciliation to be carried out on discharge. Medication reconciliation contribute to improving patient safety by reducing medication errors.
目的主要目的是分析我院血液科住院病人在药物调节过程中发现的不合理差异,以及所采取的药物干预措施。次要目的是发现有待完善的程序要点,以便根据本中心的条件对血液病患者的用药核对程序进行规范:横断面观察试验研究在一家血液科参考医院进行,该医院有 80 万居民。研究对象包括 2022 年 8 月至 10 月期间血液科收治的成人住院病人,这些病人的用药均已核对。主要变量包括:不合理差异的数量和类型、建议的药物干预措施以及接受程度:结果:分析了 36 个调解过程,其中 34 个入院,2 个院内转院。58.3%的患者出现了一些不合理的差异。共发现 38 项不合理差异,97.4% 的患者接受药物干预。最常见的差异类型是药物遗漏(56.8%)和药物相互作用(24.3%)。最常见的药物干预是重新用药(48.6%)和暂停治疗(16.2%)。使用多种药物和接受化疗的患者出现药物相互作用的概率增加了4倍:住院血液科患者在药物调节过程中最常见的不合理差异是:药物遗漏和药物相互作用。重新用药和暂停处方是最常见的药物干预措施。多重用药与不合理差异的增加有关。促进药物相互作用出现的因素是入院接受化疗和多药治疗。发现的主要改进点是需要建立一个回路,以便在出院时进行调解。通过减少用药错误,用药协调有助于提高患者的安全。
{"title":"[Translated article] Medication reconciliation in hospitalized haematological patients","authors":"Alejandro Sanjuán Belda ,&nbsp;María Vuelta Arce ,&nbsp;Jorge del Estal Jiménez ,&nbsp;Laura Canadell Vilarrasa","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.08.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.08.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The main objective is to analyse unjustified discrepancies found during the medication reconciliation process in patients admitted to the Haematology Service of our hospital, in addition to the pharmaceutical interventions carried out. As a secondary objective, to detect possible points of the procedure to be perfected with a view to protocolizing the medication reconciliation process in haematological patients that adapts to the conditions of our center.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional observational pilot study carried out in a reference hospital in haematology for a population of 800 000 inhabitants. Adult inpatients admitted to the Haematology Service between August and October 2022 whose medication had been reconciled were included. The main variables were: number and type of unjustified discrepancy, proposed pharmaceutical intervention, and degree of acceptance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>36 conciliation processes were analysed, 34 admissions and 2 intrahospital transfer. 58.3% of the patients presented some unjustified discrepancy. 38 unjustified discrepancies were detected, with an acceptance of pharmaceutical interventions of 97.4%. The most common types of discrepancy were medication omission (56.8%) and drug interaction (24.3%). The most frequent pharmaceutical interventions were reintroducing medication (48.6%) and suspending treatment (16.2%). Polypharmacy and receiving chemotherapy treatment multiply by 4 the probability of presenting drug interactions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The most common unjustified discrepancies in the medication reconciliation process in hospitalized haematology patients are: medication omission and drug interactions. The reintroduction of medication and suspension of the prescription are the most frequent accepted pharmaceutical interventions. Polypharmacy is related to an increase in unjustified discrepancies. The factors that promote the appearance of interactions are admissions to receive chemotherapy treatment and polypharmacy. The main point of improvement detected is the need to create a circuit that allows conciliation to be carried out on discharge. Medication reconciliation contribute to improving patient safety by reducing medication errors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":"49 1","pages":"Pages T11-T16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Translated article] Analysis of the situation of pharmaceutical care for patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases before and after the COVID-19 pandemic 分析 COVID-19 大流行前后对免疫介导的炎症性疾病患者的药物治疗情况。
IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2024.10.001
Piedad López Sánchez , Tomás Palanques Pastor , Olatz Ibarra Barrueta , Esther Ramírez Herráiz , Míriam Casellas Gibert , Emilio Monte Boquet

Objective

To describe, analyse, and compare the situation of pharmaceutical care consultations for outpatients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases of the Pharmacy Services of Spain at 2 different times.

Method

Longitudinal, multicentre, and unidisciplinary descriptive observational study, carried out by the Immune-mediated Inflammatory Diseases Working Group of the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy through a virtual survey in 2019 and 2021. Variables were collected regarding coordination, resources, biosimilars, unmet needs, and telepharmacy. Numerical results were presented in absolute value and percentage and free-text responses were grouped by topic areas. To compare the results between the 2 collection times, the Chi-Square test was used with a significance level of P < .05.

Results

The level of participation was 70 pharmacists in 2019 and 53 in 2021. The main significant findings obtained were an increase in participation in asthma biologic committees (P = .044) and care coordination in dermatology (P = .003) and digestive system (P = .022). The wide use of biosimilar biological medicines stood out, with a 15% increase in the exchange of the reference biological to the biosimilar. The lack of research in the field and insufficient human resources, among other unmet needs, were revealed. In the outpatient units, the use of the stratification model of the MAPEX project was a minority and an increase in the use of information and communication technologies was promoted. Motivated by the pandemic derived from COVID-19, telepharmacy was established for the first time in 85% of the centres, maintaining the service at 66% at the time of the second survey.

Conclusions

Outpatient units are undergoing constant change to adapt to new times, for which institutional support is needed to invest more resources to promote the development of strategies to reduce unmet needs. We must continue working to achieve a pharmaceutical practice that provides efficiency, safety, quality of life, and access to innovative drugs in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.
目的描述、分析和比较西班牙药房服务部门在两个不同时期为免疫介导的炎症性疾病门诊患者提供药物治疗咨询的情况:西班牙医院药学协会免疫介导的炎症性疾病工作组在 2019 年和 2021 年通过虚拟调查开展了纵向、多中心和单学科描述性观察研究。收集的变量涉及协调、资源、生物仿制药、未满足的需求和远程药学。数字结果以绝对值和百分比表示,自由文本回复按主题领域分组。为了比较两个收集时间的结果,采用了 Chi-Square 检验,显著性水平为 P <.05:2019 年有 70 名药剂师参与,2021 年有 53 名药剂师参与。主要的重大发现是参与哮喘生物制剂委员会(P = .044)以及皮肤科(P = .003)和消化系统(P = .022)护理协调的人数有所增加。生物仿制药的广泛使用尤为突出,从参考生物药到生物仿制药的交换增加了 15%。除其他未满足的需求外,该领域还存在研究不足和人力资源不足的问题。在门诊部,使用 MAPEX 项目的分层模型的人不多,而使用信息和通信技术的人则有所增加。在 COVID-19 大流行的推动下,85% 的中心首次建立了远程药房,在第二次调查时,这项服务的使用率保持在 66%:门诊部正在经历着不断的变革,以适应新的时代,为此需要机构的支持,投入更多的资源来促进战略的发展,以减少未满足的需求。我们必须继续努力,为免疫介导的炎症性疾病患者提供高效、安全、优质的生活和创新药物。
{"title":"[Translated article] Analysis of the situation of pharmaceutical care for patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases before and after the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Piedad López Sánchez ,&nbsp;Tomás Palanques Pastor ,&nbsp;Olatz Ibarra Barrueta ,&nbsp;Esther Ramírez Herráiz ,&nbsp;Míriam Casellas Gibert ,&nbsp;Emilio Monte Boquet","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.10.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe, analyse, and compare the situation of pharmaceutical care consultations for outpatients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases of the Pharmacy Services of Spain at 2 different times.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Longitudinal, multicentre, and unidisciplinary descriptive observational study, carried out by the Immune-mediated Inflammatory Diseases Working Group of the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy through a virtual survey in 2019 and 2021. Variables were collected regarding coordination, resources, biosimilars, unmet needs, and telepharmacy. Numerical results were presented in absolute value and percentage and free-text responses were grouped by topic areas. To compare the results between the 2 collection times, the Chi-Square test was used with a significance level of <em>P</em> &lt; .05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The level of participation was 70 pharmacists in 2019 and 53 in 2021. The main significant findings obtained were an increase in participation in asthma biologic committees (<em>P</em> = .044) and care coordination in dermatology (<em>P</em> = .003) and digestive system (<em>P</em> = .022). The wide use of biosimilar biological medicines stood out, with a 15% increase in the exchange of the reference biological to the biosimilar. The lack of research in the field and insufficient human resources, among other unmet needs, were revealed. In the outpatient units, the use of the stratification model of the MAPEX project was a minority and an increase in the use of information and communication technologies was promoted. Motivated by the pandemic derived from COVID-19, telepharmacy was established for the first time in 85% of the centres, maintaining the service at 66% at the time of the second survey.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Outpatient units are undergoing constant change to adapt to new times, for which institutional support is needed to invest more resources to promote the development of strategies to reduce unmet needs. We must continue working to achieve a pharmaceutical practice that provides efficiency, safety, quality of life, and access to innovative drugs in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":"49 1","pages":"Pages T24-T31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142629968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bronchodilator administration by pressurized inhaler during invasive mechanical ventilation in adults: A scoping review 成人有创机械通气期间使用加压吸入器给予支气管扩张剂:范围综述。
IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2024.03.012
Kathleen Asturian, Mariana Balhego-Rocha, Diogo Pilger

Objective

To identify the administration characteristics and connection methods of bronchodilators by pressurized inhalers to the ventilatory circuit of patients under invasive mechanical ventilation.

Methods

A scope review was conducted following the PRISMA for Scoping Review, using the PubMed, Embase Elsevier, Cochrane Library, and Lilacs databases without language restrictions, up to July 2023. Eligible sources included reviews and consensuses (based on clinical studies), experimental and observational studies involving adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit and undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation, regardless of the underlying condition, who used bronchodilator drugs contained in pressurized inhalers. Information regarding inhalation technique, pressurized inhalers connection mode to the circuit, and patient care were collected by 2 researchers independently, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Studies involving bronchodilators combined with other pharmacological classes in the same device, as well as reviews containing preclinical studies, were excluded.

Results

In total, 23 publications were included, comprising 19 clinical trials and 4 non-randomized experimental studies. Salbutamol (albuterol) was the bronchodilator of study in the majority of the articles (n = 18), and the spacer device was the most commonly used to connect the pressurized inhaler to the circuit (n = 15), followed by an in-line adapter (n = 3), and a direct-acting device without chamber (n = 3). Concerning the pressurized inhaler placement in the circuit, 18 studies positioned it in the inspiratory limb, and 19 studies synchronized the jet actuation with the start of the inspiratory phase. Agitation of the pressurized inhaler before each actuation, waiting time between actuations, airway suction before administration, and semi-recumbent patient positioning were the most commonly described measures across the studies.

Conclusions

This review provided insights into the aspects related to inhalation technique in mechanically ventilated patients, as well as the most prevalent findings and the existing gaps in knowledge regarding bronchodilator administration in this context. The evidence indicates the need for further research on this subject.
目的确定支气管扩张剂通过加压吸入器进入有创机械通气患者通气回路的给药特点和连接方法:方法:按照范围界定审查的 PRISMA 标准,使用 PubMed、Embase Elsevier、Cochrane Library 和 Lilacs 数据库进行范围界定审查,无语言限制,截至 2023 年 7 月。符合条件的资料来源包括综述和共识(基于临床研究)、实验和观察性研究,这些研究涉及入住重症监护病房并接受有创机械通气的成年患者,无论其基础疾病如何,均使用了加压吸入器中的支气管扩张药物。有关吸入技术、加压吸入器与回路的连接模式以及患者护理的信息由两名研究人员独立收集,不一致之处由第三名审查员解决。涉及同一装置中支气管扩张剂与其他药理类别结合的研究以及包含临床前研究的综述均被排除在外:结果:共纳入 23 篇文献,包括 19 项临床试验和 4 项非随机实验研究。大多数文章(18 篇)研究的支气管扩张剂是沙丁胺醇(阿布特罗),最常用的是将加压吸入器连接到回路的间隔装置(15 篇),其次是在线适配器(3 篇)和无腔直接作用装置(3 篇)。关于加压吸入器在回路中的位置,18 项研究将其置于吸气肢,19 项研究将喷射启动与吸气阶段的开始同步。每次启动前对加压吸入器的搅拌、启动之间的等待时间、给药前的气道吸引以及半卧位患者体位是所有研究中最常描述的措施:本综述深入探讨了与机械通气患者吸入技术相关的各个方面,以及在这种情况下支气管扩张剂给药方面最普遍的发现和现有的知识差距。有证据表明,有必要就这一主题开展进一步研究。
{"title":"Bronchodilator administration by pressurized inhaler during invasive mechanical ventilation in adults: A scoping review","authors":"Kathleen Asturian,&nbsp;Mariana Balhego-Rocha,&nbsp;Diogo Pilger","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.03.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.03.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify the administration characteristics and connection methods of bronchodilators by pressurized inhalers to the ventilatory circuit of patients under invasive mechanical ventilation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A scope review was conducted following the PRISMA for Scoping Review, using the PubMed, Embase Elsevier, Cochrane Library, and Lilacs databases without language restrictions, up to July 2023. Eligible sources included reviews and consensuses (based on clinical studies), experimental and observational studies involving adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit and undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation, regardless of the underlying condition, who used bronchodilator drugs contained in pressurized inhalers. Information regarding inhalation technique, pressurized inhalers connection mode to the circuit, and patient care were collected by 2 researchers independently, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Studies involving bronchodilators combined with other pharmacological classes in the same device, as well as reviews containing preclinical studies, were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 23 publications were included, comprising 19 clinical trials and 4 non-randomized experimental studies. Salbutamol (albuterol) was the bronchodilator of study in the majority of the articles (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->18), and the spacer device was the most commonly used to connect the pressurized inhaler to the circuit (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->15), followed by an in-line adapter (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->3), and a direct-acting device without chamber (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->3). Concerning the pressurized inhaler placement in the circuit, 18 studies positioned it in the inspiratory limb, and 19 studies synchronized the jet actuation with the start of the inspiratory phase. Agitation of the pressurized inhaler before each actuation, waiting time between actuations, airway suction before administration, and semi-recumbent patient positioning were the most commonly described measures across the studies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This review provided insights into the aspects related to inhalation technique in mechanically ventilated patients, as well as the most prevalent findings and the existing gaps in knowledge regarding bronchodilator administration in this context. The evidence indicates the need for further research on this subject.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":"49 1","pages":"Pages 53-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141162606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1