FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA最新文献

The main objective of the activity carried out in an intensive care unit (ICU) and in general, in all hospitalization units, is to provide all the human and material resources to offer the best therapeutic care to admitted patients. Work in multidisciplinary teams, made up of specialists in intensive care medicine as those responsible for the patients, doctors from other specialties, specialized nursing, physiotherapists, nutritionists, and clinical pharmacists is an optimal approach to achieve the proposed objective. The activities of the clinical pharmacist can be developed at different levels (basic, intermediate, and excellent) depending on the degree of involvement, the time dedicated, the training, and the available resources. This article aims to establish an initial work guide, through recommendations aimed at the activity to be developed by the clinical pharmacist in the ICU in relation to critical patient care and quality improvement, which serves as a reference for those pharmacists who go to develop pharmaceutical care activities in critical patients.

The objective of regulatory authorities is to ensure a favourable risk-benefit balance for medicines in their licenced indication, without seeking to establish their place in the therapeutic armamentarium beyond that. The licenced indication covers heterogeneous subpopulations and often does not sufficiently specify the characteristics of the patients who may benefit. The regulatory information does not always show the benefit over the standard treatment(s); moreover, it only reacts to the conditions specified in the developer's application, and lacks an assessment of the clinical relevance of the benefit and its uncertainties. Many cases highlight the need to establish a more specific therapeutic benefit scenario than the licenced indication. For example, abemaciclib was approved in the adjuvant setting for high-risk patients with early breast cancer, but the appropriate level of risk and how to assess it needs to be specified. Also, pembrolizumab is approved for neoadjuvant plus adjuvant treatment in lung cancer; but it remains to be analysed whether it is superior to nivolumab in neoadjuvant treatment alone, which involves less treatment and economic burden. As therapeutic positioning is always a necessary decision, whether made at a national, regional, local, or individual level, it must be made in the most appropriate way. The absence of a multidisciplinary discussion and consensus, relying only on individual decisions to determine positioning from the outset, underestimates information gaps, inter-individual variability, and the influence of drug promotion. It can be harmful and costly. To properly manage the introduction of new medicines, it is essential to establish their benefit scenario in a multidisciplinary way. This, together with consideration of the clinical benefit provided versus the appropriate alternatives and the uncertainties of the benefit, constitutes the objective of the clinical assessment and the basis for designing a well-focused economic analysis. This allows policy-makers to make the most appropriate decisions on pricing and funding new treatments. In an ideal situation, the benefit scenario considered for the new medicine would coincide with the one established for funding, but costs that are difficult to bear may lead to restrictions and affect the final positioning after the economic and budgetary impact assessment.

Introduction: The Community Pharmacy Survey on Patient Safety Culture (CPSOPSC) is a tool created by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and used in the United States to assess the patient safety culture among community pharmacy workers. This survey has been adapted for use in hospital pharmacies in other countries. However, it has not yet been implemented in Spanish hospital pharmacies due to the lack of an applicable version in Spain. This project aims to adapt and reach a consensus on the CPSOPSC for its subsequent use as a tool to improve patient safety in hospital pharmacies in Spain.

Methods: This non-clinical study will be developed in different phases: obtaining the necessary permissions, reviewing the literature to identify studies on the use of the CPSOPSC in hospital pharmacies, adapting the survey's questions to the sociocultural context, reaching a consensus on the questions using the Delphi-Rand/UCLA methodology with a panel of patient safety experts. These experts, who are hospital pharmacists, will evaluate the adapted survey in several rounds, using a Likert scale and telematic workshops to adjust the questions. Finally, a software application will be developed for the implementation, completion, and data management of the survey.

Discussion: Adapting the CPSOPSC to hospital pharmacies in Spain may be a useful tool for measuring the patient safety culture in this context. Through the Delphi-Rand/UCLA methodology, expert consensus and the relevance of the survey are ensured. Additionally, the creation of a computer application will facilitate data collection and analysis, promoting its use among professionals. The resulting survey from this project can identify specific needs and areas for improvement in Spanish hospital pharmacies, being useful for future actions aimed at improving patient safety.

Objective: The treatment and prevention of delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU) have gained significant importance in patient care in recent years. Some studies have linked delirium with increased risks of mortality, prolonged hospital stay, and more days of mechanical ventilation. This study aims to analyse the use of psychotropic drugs initiated in the ICU and their continuation upon hospital discharge, as well as to evaluate their contribution to polypharmacy and associated adverse clinical effects.

Method: A multicentre prospective observational case study was designed, focusing on patients over 18 years old admitted to the ICU and treated with psychotropic drugs. Data on demographics, variables related to admission and psychotropic drug treatment, as well as clinical outcomes and adverse effects, will be collected. Among other variables, the frequency of psychotropic treatments initiated in the ICU and continued upon discharge from the ICU and the hospital will be measured. Data collection will be performed through review of electronic medical records and prescription programmes, and IBM SPSS 20.0 statistical package will be used for analysis.

Discussion: Delirium is common in ICU patients and is associated with long-term negative consequences. Although antipsychotics are used to treat delirium, their prolonged use can have adverse effects, and their continuation after ICU discharge contributes to polypharmacy. This study aims to provide information on the use of psychotropic drugs initiated in the ICU and their continuation upon discharge, with the goal of identifying opportunities for intervention and reducing unnecessary use of these medications.

Introduction: Pediatric patients are more likely to experience medication-related errors and serious associated harms. The identification of high-risk medications (HRM) and their study in special populations, such as children with excess body weight (EBW), is a part of safety improvement strategies.

Objective: To generate, through a consensus technique structured by an interdisciplinary group of pediatricians and hospital pharmacists, an operational and updated list of HRM for hospital use in children over 2 years of age. The document was part of a collaboration project between the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacists and the Spanish Society of Pediatric Hospital Medicine.

Methods: The study was carried out in 2 sequential phases: (a) preparation of a preliminary list of HRM through bibliographic review and (b) subsequent application of the double-round Delphi method to agree on a definitive list of HRM. The results obtained were validated by calculating the probability of chance agreement and the modified Kappa statistic for each drug.

Results: The original list obtained by bibliographic review included 26 pharmacological classes and 96 drugs. Of the total of 37 experts, 32 (86.4%) completed both rounds of the Delphi. The final consensus list of HRM incorporated 24 pharmacological classes and 101 drugs. The modified Kappa statistic reflected a high percent agreement (94.9%) in the consensus reached by the participants.

Conclusion: This list can establish a tool for future studies and interventions to improve the safety of medications in general pediatric population, as well as in high-risk subgroups, such as pediatric patients with EBW.