Sandra Pitts, Renee R. Phillips, Paula B. Miltenberger, Monica Bennett, Christy Tucker, Anna J. Thomas, Hannah F. Cassedy, Claude A. Stringer
Studies of psychological morbidity and quality of life in ovarian cancer (OC) patients have largely relied on self-report measures despite substantial research questioning the confounding effects of denial and self-deception in self-report scores. This study investigated the use of the Early Memory Index (EMI) for detection of psychological distress among OC patients. Early Memory Index outcomes of 77 OC outpatients were compared with high and low distress scores on the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form-Y (STAI-S, STAI-T). A higher percentage of participants scored as distressed on the EMI (51%) than the CES-D (30%), STAI-S (16%), and STAI-T (21%). A sizable percentage (up to 48%) of low distress respondents on self-report measures demonstrated illusory mental health on the EMI. Results support earlier research demonstrating self-report scales’ limitation detecting psychological distress and the possibility of the EMI as an alternative screening measure of psychological adjustment in OC patients.
{"title":"Psychological morbidity in ovarian cancer: An alternative assessment method","authors":"Sandra Pitts, Renee R. Phillips, Paula B. Miltenberger, Monica Bennett, Christy Tucker, Anna J. Thomas, Hannah F. Cassedy, Claude A. Stringer","doi":"10.1111/jabr.12143","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jabr.12143","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Studies of psychological morbidity and quality of life in ovarian cancer (OC) patients have largely relied on self-report measures despite substantial research questioning the confounding effects of denial and self-deception in self-report scores. This study investigated the use of the Early Memory Index (EMI) for detection of psychological distress among OC patients. Early Memory Index outcomes of 77 OC outpatients were compared with high and low distress scores on the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form-Y (STAI-S, STAI-T). A higher percentage of participants scored as <i>distressed</i> on the EMI (51%) than the CES-D (30%), STAI-S (16%), and STAI-T (21%). A sizable percentage (up to 48%) of low distress respondents on self-report measures demonstrated <i>illusory mental health</i> on the EMI. Results support earlier research demonstrating self-report scales’ limitation detecting psychological distress and the possibility of the EMI as an alternative screening measure of psychological adjustment in OC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":45868,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOBEHAVIORAL RESEARCH","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jabr.12143","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46127221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Evidence indicates that our relationships with coworkers and supervisors significantly influence our health and well-being. The field of workplace health promotion—historically and currently—either ignores or fails to leverage insights from this evidence. In ways similar to individuals who look for a “magic pill” or diet to fix a health problem, employers also seek quick, external answers to health problems in their workforce. The current paper describes the development of an integral model to guide employers, researchers, and consultants in health promotion efforts. The paper is divided into three parts, from a broad perspective (Part 1) to the development of the model (Part 2) to providing specific empirical examples of the model in action (Part 3). Part 1 explains why integrative efforts are necessary and how they can work. Part 2 describes features of the model and shows how they are currently being utilized by employers but without integration. Part 3 reviews empirical interventions developed by my colleagues and I over the past 20 years. These are designed to impact one of five leverage points in work settings: leadership development; team training; well-being champions; climate assessments and surveys; and linking employee assistance (EAP) and wellness services.
{"title":"Integral Organizational Wellness™: An evidence-based model of socially inspired well-being","authors":"Joel B. Bennett","doi":"10.1111/jabr.12136","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jabr.12136","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Evidence indicates that our relationships with coworkers and supervisors significantly influence our health and well-being. The field of workplace health promotion—historically and currently—either ignores or fails to leverage insights from this evidence. In ways similar to individuals who look for a “magic pill” or diet to fix a health problem, employers also seek quick, external answers to health problems in their workforce. The current paper describes the development of an integral model to guide employers, researchers, and consultants in health promotion efforts. The paper is divided into three parts, from a broad perspective (Part 1) to the development of the model (Part 2) to providing specific empirical examples of the model in action (Part 3). Part 1 explains why integrative efforts are necessary and how they can work. Part 2 describes features of the model and shows how they are currently being utilized by employers but without integration. Part 3 reviews empirical interventions developed by my colleagues and I over the past 20 years. These are designed to impact one of five leverage points in work settings: leadership development; team training; well-being champions; climate assessments and surveys; and linking employee assistance (EAP) and wellness services.</p>","PeriodicalId":45868,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOBEHAVIORAL RESEARCH","volume":"23 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jabr.12136","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46113107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}