首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions最新文献

英文 中文
Can an artificial intelligence chatbot be the author of a scholarly article? 一个人工智能聊天机器人能成为一篇学术文章的作者吗?
Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2023-02-27 DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2022.20.6
Ju Yoen Lee
At the end of 2022, the appearance of ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot with amazing writing ability, caused a great sensation in academia. The chatbot turned out to be very capable, but also capable of deception, and the news broke that several researchers had listed the chatbot (including its earlier version) as co-authors of their academic papers. In response, Nature and Science expressed their position that this chatbot cannot be listed as an author in the papers they publish. Since an AI chatbot is not a human being, in the current legal system, the text automatically generated by an AI chatbot cannot be a copyrighted work; thus, an AI chatbot cannot be an author of a copyrighted work. Current AI chatbots such as ChatGPT are much more advanced than search engines in that they produce original text, but they still remain at the level of a search engine in that they cannot take responsibility for their writing. For this reason, they also cannot be authors from the perspective of research ethics.
2022年底,具有惊人写作能力的人工智能(AI)聊天机器人ChatGPT的出现在学术界引起了极大的轰动。事实证明,这个聊天机器人非常有能力,但也有欺骗能力,有消息称,几名研究人员已经将这个聊天机器人(包括它的早期版本)列为他们学术论文的共同作者。对此,《自然》和《科学》表示,不能在发表的论文中把这个聊天机器人列为作者。由于AI聊天机器人不是人类,在目前的法律体系中,AI聊天机器人自动生成的文本不可能是受版权保护的作品;因此,人工智能聊天机器人不能是受版权保护的作品的作者。目前,ChatGPT等人工智能聊天机器人在原创文字方面比搜索引擎先进得多,但由于无法承担写作责任,仍然停留在搜索引擎的水平。因此,从研究伦理的角度来看,他们也不能成为作者。
{"title":"Can an artificial intelligence chatbot be the author of a scholarly article?","authors":"Ju Yoen Lee","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2022.20.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2022.20.6","url":null,"abstract":"At the end of 2022, the appearance of ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot with amazing writing ability, caused a great sensation in academia. The chatbot turned out to be very capable, but also capable of deception, and the news broke that several researchers had listed the chatbot (including its earlier version) as co-authors of their academic papers. In response, Nature and Science expressed their position that this chatbot cannot be listed as an author in the papers they publish. Since an AI chatbot is not a human being, in the current legal system, the text automatically generated by an AI chatbot cannot be a copyrighted work; thus, an AI chatbot cannot be an author of a copyrighted work. Current AI chatbots such as ChatGPT are much more advanced than search engines in that they produce original text, but they still remain at the level of a search engine in that they cannot take responsibility for their writing. For this reason, they also cannot be authors from the perspective of research ethics.","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135892320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Are ChatGPT’s knowledge and interpretation ability comparable to those of medical students in Korea for taking a parasitology examination?: a descriptive study ChatGPT的知识和解释能力与韩国医学生参加寄生虫学考试的能力相当吗?:描述性研究
IF 4.4 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2023-01-11 DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.01
Sun Huh
This study aimed to compare the knowledge and interpretation ability of ChatGPT, a language model of artificial general intelligence, with those of medical students in Korea by administering a parasitology examination to both ChatGPT and medical students. The examination consisted of 79 items and was administered to ChatGPT on January 1, 2023. The examination results were analyzed in terms of ChatGPT’s overall performance score, its correct answer rate by the items’ knowledge level, and the acceptability of its explanations of the items. ChatGPT’s performance was lower than that of the medical students, and ChatGPT’s correct answer rate was not related to the items’ knowledge level. However, there was a relationship between acceptable explanations and correct answers. In conclusion, ChatGPT’s knowledge and interpretation ability for this parasitology examination were not yet comparable to those of medical students in Korea.
本研究旨在通过对通用人工智能语言模型ChatGPT和韩国医学生进行寄生虫学检查,将其知识和解释能力与韩国医学生的知识和理解能力进行比较。该检查包括79个项目,于2023年1月1日在ChatGPT进行。根据ChatGPT的总体表现分数、项目知识水平的正确回答率以及项目解释的可接受性对考试结果进行了分析。查特GPT的成绩低于医学生,查特GPt的正确回答率与项目的知识水平无关。然而,可接受的解释和正确的答案之间存在关系。总之,ChatGPT在这次寄生虫学考试中的知识和解释能力还不能与韩国医学生相比。
{"title":"Are ChatGPT’s knowledge and interpretation ability comparable to those of medical students in Korea for taking a parasitology examination?: a descriptive study","authors":"Sun Huh","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.01","url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to compare the knowledge and interpretation ability of ChatGPT, a language model of artificial general intelligence, with those of medical students in Korea by administering a parasitology examination to both ChatGPT and medical students. The examination consisted of 79 items and was administered to ChatGPT on January 1, 2023. The examination results were analyzed in terms of ChatGPT’s overall performance score, its correct answer rate by the items’ knowledge level, and the acceptability of its explanations of the items. ChatGPT’s performance was lower than that of the medical students, and ChatGPT’s correct answer rate was not related to the items’ knowledge level. However, there was a relationship between acceptable explanations and correct answers. In conclusion, ChatGPT’s knowledge and interpretation ability for this parasitology examination were not yet comparable to those of medical students in Korea.","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45226107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 117
Enhancement of the technical and non-technical skills of nurse anesthesia students using the Anesthetic List Management Assessment Tool in Iran: a quasi-experimental study. 在伊朗使用麻醉清单管理评估工具提高麻醉护士学生的技术和非技术技能:一项准实验研究。
IF 4.4 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.19
Ali Khalafi, Maedeh Kordnejad, Vahid Saidkhani

Purpose: This study investigated the effect of evaluations based on the Anesthetic List Management Assessment Tool (ALMAT) form on improving the technical and non-technical skills of final-year nurse anesthesia students at Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (AJUMS).

Methods: This was a semi-experimental study with a pre-test and post-test design. It included 45 final-year nurse anesthesia students of AJUMS and lasted for 3 months. The technical and non-technical skills of the intervention group were assessed at 4 university hospitals using formative-feedback evaluation based onthe ALMAT form, from induction of anesthesia until reaching mastery and independence. Finally, the students’ degree of improvement in technical and non-technical skills was compared between the intervention and control groups. Statistical tests (the independent t-test, paired t-test, and Mann-Whitney test) were used to analyze the data.

Results: The rate of improvement in post-test scores of technical skills was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P<0.0001). Similarly, the students in the intervention group received significantly higher post-test scores for non-technical skills than the students in the control group (P<0.0001).

Conclusion: The findings of this study showed that the use of ALMAT as a formative-feedback evaluation method to evaluate technical and non-technical skills had a significant effect on improving these skills and was effective in helping students learn and reach mastery and independence.

目的:探讨基于麻醉清单管理评估工具(ALMAT)表格的评估对提高阿瓦士准噶尔医科大学(AJUMS)麻醉科毕业班护士的技术和非技术技能的影响。方法:采用前测和后测设计的半实验研究。该研究包括45名AJUMS最后一届护士麻醉学生,持续3个月。采用基于ALMAT表格的形成反馈评价方法,对4所大学医院干预组的技术和非技术技能进行评估,从麻醉诱导到达到掌握和独立。最后,比较干预组和对照组学生在技术和非技术技能方面的改善程度。采用统计检验(独立t检验、配对t检验和Mann-Whitney检验)对数据进行分析。结果:干预组技术技能测验后得分的改善率显著高于对照组(p)。结论:本研究结果表明,使用ALMAT作为一种形成反馈的评价方法来评价技术和非技术技能,对提高技术和非技术技能有显著的效果,对帮助学生学习和达到掌握和独立是有效的。
{"title":"Enhancement of the technical and non-technical skills of nurse anesthesia students using the Anesthetic List Management Assessment Tool in Iran: a quasi-experimental study.","authors":"Ali Khalafi,&nbsp;Maedeh Kordnejad,&nbsp;Vahid Saidkhani","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.19","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.19","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the effect of evaluations based on the Anesthetic List Management Assessment Tool (ALMAT) form on improving the technical and non-technical skills of final-year nurse anesthesia students at Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (AJUMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a semi-experimental study with a pre-test and post-test design. It included 45 final-year nurse anesthesia students of AJUMS and lasted for 3 months. The technical and non-technical skills of the intervention group were assessed at 4 university hospitals using formative-feedback evaluation based on\u0000the ALMAT form, from induction of anesthesia until reaching mastery and independence. Finally, the students’ degree of improvement in technical and non-technical skills was compared between the intervention and control groups. Statistical tests (the independent t-test, paired t-test, and Mann-Whitney test) were used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of improvement in post-test scores of technical skills was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P<0.0001). Similarly, the students in the intervention group received significantly higher post-test scores for non-technical skills than the students in the control group (P<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study showed that the use of ALMAT as a formative-feedback evaluation method to evaluate technical and non-technical skills had a significant effect on improving these skills and was effective in helping students learn and reach mastery and independence.</p>","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"20 ","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10352009/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9833205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What impacts students' satisfaction the most from Medicine Student Experience Questionnaire in Australia: a validity study. 澳大利亚医学生体验问卷对学生满意度影响最大的因素:一项效度研究。
IF 4.4 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.2
Pin-Hsiang Huang, Gary Velan, Greg Smith, Melanie Fentoullis, Sean Edward Kennedy, Karen Jane Gibson, Kerry Uebel, Boaz Shulruf

Purpose: This study evaluated the validity of student feedback derived from Medicine Student Experience Questionnaire (MedSEQ), as well as the predictors of students' satisfaction in the Medicine program.

Methods: Data from MedSEQ applying to the University of New South Wales Medicine program in 2017, 2019, and 2021 were analyzed. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Cronbach's α were used to assess the construct validity and reliability of MedSEQ respectively. Hierarchical multiple linear regressions were used to identify the factors that most impact students' overall satisfaction with the program.

Results: A total of 1,719 students (34.50%) responded to MedSEQ. CFA showed good fit indices (root mean square error of approximation=0.051; comparative fit index=0.939; chi-square/degrees of freedom=6.429). All factors yielded good (α>0.7) or very good (α>0.8) levels of reliability, except the "online resources" factor, which had acceptable reliability (α=0.687). A multiple linear regression model with only demographic characteristics explained 3.8% of the variance in students' overall satisfaction, whereas the model adding 8 domains from MedSEQ explained 40%, indicating that 36.2% of the variance was attributable to students' experience across the 8 domains. Three domains had the strongest impact on overall satisfaction: "being cared for," "satisfaction with teaching," and "satisfaction with assessment" (β=0.327, 0.148, 0.148, respectively; all with P<0.001).

Conclusion: MedSEQ has good construct validity and high reliability, reflecting students' satisfaction with the Medicine program. Key factors impacting students' satisfaction are the perception of being cared for, quality teaching irrespective of the mode of delivery and fair assessment tasks which enhance learning.

目的:本研究评估医学生体验问卷(MedSEQ)学生反馈的效度,以及医学生满意度的预测因子。方法:对2017年、2019年和2021年申请新南威尔士大学医学项目的MedSEQ数据进行分析。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)和Cronbach’s α分别评估MedSEQ的结构效度和信度。层次多元线性回归用于确定最影响学生对该计划的整体满意度的因素。结果:共有1719名学生(34.50%)对MedSEQ有反应。CFA显示了良好的拟合指数(近似均方根误差=0.051;比较拟合指数=0.939;卡方/自由度=6.429)。除“在线资源”因子具有可接受的信度(α=0.687)外,所有因子的信度均为良好(α>0.7)或非常好(α>0.8)。仅包含人口统计学特征的多元线性回归模型解释了3.8%的学生总体满意度方差,而加入MedSEQ的8个领域的模型解释了40%,表明36.2%的方差可归因于学生在8个领域的经历。三个领域对整体满意度的影响最大:“被关心”,“教学满意度”和“评估满意度”(β分别=0.327,0.148,0.148;结论:MedSEQ量表具有较好的结构效度和较高的信度,反映了学生对医学专业的满意度。影响学生满意度的主要因素包括:被关心的感觉、不论教学方式如何的优质教学,以及促进学习的公平评估任务。
{"title":"What impacts students' satisfaction the most from Medicine Student Experience Questionnaire in Australia: a validity study.","authors":"Pin-Hsiang Huang,&nbsp;Gary Velan,&nbsp;Greg Smith,&nbsp;Melanie Fentoullis,&nbsp;Sean Edward Kennedy,&nbsp;Karen Jane Gibson,&nbsp;Kerry Uebel,&nbsp;Boaz Shulruf","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the validity of student feedback derived from Medicine Student Experience Questionnaire (MedSEQ), as well as the predictors of students' satisfaction in the Medicine program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from MedSEQ applying to the University of New South Wales Medicine program in 2017, 2019, and 2021 were analyzed. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Cronbach's α were used to assess the construct validity and reliability of MedSEQ respectively. Hierarchical multiple linear regressions were used to identify the factors that most impact students' overall satisfaction with the program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,719 students (34.50%) responded to MedSEQ. CFA showed good fit indices (root mean square error of approximation=0.051; comparative fit index=0.939; chi-square/degrees of freedom=6.429). All factors yielded good (α>0.7) or very good (α>0.8) levels of reliability, except the \"online resources\" factor, which had acceptable reliability (α=0.687). A multiple linear regression model with only demographic characteristics explained 3.8% of the variance in students' overall satisfaction, whereas the model adding 8 domains from MedSEQ explained 40%, indicating that 36.2% of the variance was attributable to students' experience across the 8 domains. Three domains had the strongest impact on overall satisfaction: \"being cared for,\" \"satisfaction with teaching,\" and \"satisfaction with assessment\" (β=0.327, 0.148, 0.148, respectively; all with P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MedSEQ has good construct validity and high reliability, reflecting students' satisfaction with the Medicine program. Key factors impacting students' satisfaction are the perception of being cared for, quality teaching irrespective of the mode of delivery and fair assessment tasks which enhance learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"20 ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9986309/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10866573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Efficacy and limitations of ChatGPT as a biostatistical problem-solving tool in medical education in Serbia: a descriptive study ChatGPT作为医学教育中生物统计学问题解决工具的有效性和局限性:一项描述性研究。
IF 4.4 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-16 DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.28
Aleksandra Ignjatović, Lazar Stevanović
Purpose This study aimed to assess the performance of ChatGPT (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) as a study tool in solving biostatistical problems and to identify any potential drawbacks that might arise from using ChatGPT in medical education, particularly in solving practical biostatistical problems. Methods ChatGPT was tested to evaluate its ability to solve biostatistical problems from the Handbook of Medical Statistics by Peacock and Peacock in this descriptive study. Tables from the problems were transformed into textual questions. Ten biostatistical problems were randomly chosen and used as text-based input for conversation with ChatGPT (versions 3.5 and 4). Results GPT-3.5 solved 5 practical problems in the first attempt, related to categorical data, cross-sectional study, measuring reliability, probability properties, and the t-test. GPT-3.5 failed to provide correct answers regarding analysis of variance, the chi-square test, and sample size within 3 attempts. GPT-4 also solved a task related to the confidence interval in the first attempt and solved all questions within 3 attempts, with precise guidance and monitoring. Conclusion The assessment of both versions of ChatGPT performance in 10 biostatistical problems revealed that GPT-3.5 and 4’s performance was below average, with correct response rates of 5 and 6 out of 10 on the first attempt. GPT-4 succeeded in providing all correct answers within 3 attempts. These findings indicate that students must be aware that this tool, even when providing and calculating different statistical analyses, can be wrong, and they should be aware of ChatGPT’s limitations and be careful when incorporating this model into medical education.
目的:本研究旨在评估ChatGPT(GPT-3.5和GPT-4)作为解决生物统计学问题的研究工具的性能,并确定在医学教育中使用ChatGPT可能产生的任何潜在缺陷,特别是在解决实际生物统计学问题时。方法:在这项描述性研究中,对ChatGPT进行测试,以评估其解决Peacock和Peacock的《医学统计手册》中的生物统计学问题的能力。问题的表格被转换为文本问题。随机选择10个生物统计学问题,并将其用作与ChatGPT(3.5版和4版)对话的基于文本的输入。结果:GPT-3.5在第一次尝试中解决了5个实际问题,涉及分类数据、横断面研究、测量可靠性、概率属性和t检验。GPT-3.5未能在3次尝试中提供有关ANOVA、卡方检验和样本量的正确答案。GPT-4还在第一次尝试中解决了一项与置信区间有关的任务,并在3次尝试内解决了所有问题,并进行了精确的指导和监测。结论:对两个版本的ChatGPT在10个生物统计学问题中的表现的评估显示,GPT-3.5和4的表现低于平均水平,第一次尝试的正确回答率分别为5和6(满分10)。GPT-4在3次尝试内成功提供了所有正确答案。这些发现表明,学生们必须意识到,即使在提供和计算不同的统计分析时,这种工具也可能是错误的,他们应该意识到ChatGPT的局限性,并在将这种模式纳入医学教育时要小心。
{"title":"Efficacy and limitations of ChatGPT as a biostatistical problem-solving tool in medical education in Serbia: a descriptive study","authors":"Aleksandra Ignjatović, Lazar Stevanović","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.28","DOIUrl":"10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.28","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aimed to assess the performance of ChatGPT (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) as a study tool in solving biostatistical problems and to identify any potential drawbacks that might arise from using ChatGPT in medical education, particularly in solving practical biostatistical problems. Methods ChatGPT was tested to evaluate its ability to solve biostatistical problems from the Handbook of Medical Statistics by Peacock and Peacock in this descriptive study. Tables from the problems were transformed into textual questions. Ten biostatistical problems were randomly chosen and used as text-based input for conversation with ChatGPT (versions 3.5 and 4). Results GPT-3.5 solved 5 practical problems in the first attempt, related to categorical data, cross-sectional study, measuring reliability, probability properties, and the t-test. GPT-3.5 failed to provide correct answers regarding analysis of variance, the chi-square test, and sample size within 3 attempts. GPT-4 also solved a task related to the confidence interval in the first attempt and solved all questions within 3 attempts, with precise guidance and monitoring. Conclusion The assessment of both versions of ChatGPT performance in 10 biostatistical problems revealed that GPT-3.5 and 4’s performance was below average, with correct response rates of 5 and 6 out of 10 on the first attempt. GPT-4 succeeded in providing all correct answers within 3 attempts. These findings indicate that students must be aware that this tool, even when providing and calculating different statistical analyses, can be wrong, and they should be aware of ChatGPT’s limitations and be careful when incorporating this model into medical education.","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"20 ","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646144/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41239759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adequacy of the examination-based licensing system and a training-based licensing system for midwifery license according to changes in childbirth medical infrastructure in Korea: a surveybased descriptive study 根据韩国分娩医疗基础设施的变化,以考试为基础的许可制度和以培训为基础的助产许可制度是否适当:一项基于调查的描述性研究
IF 4.4 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.15
Yun Mi Kim, Sun Hee Lee, Sun Ok Lee, Mi Young An, Bu Youn Kim, Jum Mi Park

Purpose: The number of Korean midwifery licensing examination applicants has steadily decreased due to the low birth rate and lack of training institutions for midwives. This study aimed to evaluate the adequacy of the examination-based licensing system and the possibility of a training-based licensing system.

Methods: A survey questionnaire was developed and dispatched to 230 professionals from December 28, 2022 to January 13, 2023, through an online form using Google Surveys. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results.

Results: Responses from 217 persons (94.3%) were analyzed after excluding incomplete responses. Out of the 217 participants, 198 (91.2%) agreed with maintaining the current examination-based licensing system; 94 (43.3%) agreed with implementing a training-based licensing system to cover the examination costs due to the decreasing number of applicants; 132 (60.8%) agreed with establishing a midwifery education evaluation center for a training-based licensing system; 163 (75.1%) said that the quality of midwifery might be lowered if midwives were produced only by a training-based licensing system, and 197 (90.8%) said that the training of midwives as birth support personnel should be promoted in Korea.

Conclusion: Favorable results were reported for the examination-based licensing system; however, if a training-based licensing system is implemented, it will be necessary to establish a midwifery education evaluation center to manage the quality of midwives. As the annual number of candidates for the Korean midwifery licensing examination has been approximately 10 in recent years, it is necessary to consider more actively granting midwifery licenses through a training-based licensing system.

目的:由于低出生率和助产士培训机构的缺乏,韩国助产执照考试的应试者数量持续减少。本研究旨在评估以考试为基础的许可制度的充分性和以培训为基础的许可制度的可能性。方法:从2022年12月28日至2023年1月13日,通过使用谷歌调查的在线表格,制定了一份调查问卷,并向230名专业人员发放了一份调查问卷。采用描述性统计方法对结果进行分析。结果:217人(94.3%)在排除不完全回答后进行分析。在217名参与者中,198人(91.2%)同意维持目前的考试许可制度;94名(43.3%)同意推行以培训为基础的发牌制度,以支付因申请人数减少而产生的考试费用;132名(60.8%)同意设立助产士教育评估中心,实行以培训为基础的执照制度;163名(75.1%)回答说,如果只实行以培训为基础的执照制,助产士的质量可能会下降。197名(90.8%)回答说,应在韩国促进助产士的培训。结论:审查许可制度取得了良好的效果;然而,如果实行以培训为基础的执照制度,就有必要建立助产教育评估中心来管理助产士的质量。近年来,每年参加助产士资格考试的人都在10人左右,因此,有必要积极研究通过培训制授予助产士资格的方案。
{"title":"Adequacy of the examination-based licensing system and a training-based licensing system for midwifery license according to changes in childbirth medical infrastructure in Korea: a surveybased descriptive study","authors":"Yun Mi Kim,&nbsp;Sun Hee Lee,&nbsp;Sun Ok Lee,&nbsp;Mi Young An,&nbsp;Bu Youn Kim,&nbsp;Jum Mi Park","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.15","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The number of Korean midwifery licensing examination applicants has steadily decreased due to the low birth rate and lack of training institutions for midwives. This study aimed to evaluate the adequacy of the examination-based licensing system and the possibility of a training-based licensing system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey questionnaire was developed and dispatched to 230 professionals from December 28, 2022 to January 13, 2023, through an online form using Google Surveys. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses from 217 persons (94.3%) were analyzed after excluding incomplete responses. Out of the 217 participants, 198 (91.2%) agreed with maintaining the current examination-based licensing system; 94 (43.3%) agreed with implementing a training-based licensing system to cover the examination costs due to the decreasing number of applicants; 132 (60.8%) agreed with establishing a midwifery education evaluation center for a training-based licensing system; 163 (75.1%) said that the quality of midwifery might be lowered if midwives were produced only by a training-based licensing system, and 197 (90.8%) said that the training of midwives as birth support personnel should be promoted in Korea.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Favorable results were reported for the examination-based licensing system; however, if a training-based licensing system is implemented, it will be necessary to establish a midwifery education evaluation center to manage the quality of midwives. As the annual number of candidates for the Korean midwifery licensing examination has been approximately 10 in recent years, it is necessary to consider more actively granting midwifery licenses through a training-based licensing system.</p>","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"20 ","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10325871/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9761228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementation strategy for introducing a clinical skills examination to the Korean Oriental Medicine Licensing Examination: a mixed-method modified Delphi study 将临床技能考试引入韩国中医执业资格考试的实施策略:一项混合方法修正的德尔菲研究
IF 4.4 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-17 DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.23
Chan-Young Kwon, Sanghoon Lee, Min Hwangbo, Chungsik Cho, Sangwoo Shin, Dong-Hyeon Kim, Aram Jeong, Hye-Yoon Lee
Purpose This study investigated the validity of introducing a clinical skills examination (CSE) to the Korean Oriental Medicine Licensing Examination through a mixed-method modified Delphi study. Methods A 3-round Delphi study was conducted between September and November 2022. The expert panel comprised 21 oriental medicine education experts who were officially recommended by relevant institutions and organizations. The questionnaires included potential content for the CSE and a detailed implementation strategy. Subcommittees were formed to discuss concerns around the introduction of the CSE, which were collected as open-ended questions. In this study, a 66.7% or greater agreement rate was defined as achieving a consensus. Results The expert panel’s evaluation of the proposed clinical presentations and basic clinical skills suggested their priorities. Of the 10 items investigated for building a detailed implementation strategy for the introduction of the CSE to the Korean Oriental Medicine Licensing Examination, a consensus was achieved on 9. However, the agreement rate on the timing of the introduction of the CSE was low. Concerns around 4 clinical topics were discussed in the subcommittees, and potential solutions were proposed. Conclusion This study offers preliminary data and raises some concerns that can be used as a reference while discussing the introduction of the CSE to the Korean Oriental Medicine Licensing Examination.
目的:本研究通过混合方法改进的德尔菲研究(Delphi study)来调查在韩国中医执照考试中引入临床技能考试(CSE)的有效性。方法:在2022年9月至11月进行了3轮德尔菲研究。专家小组由21名由有关机构和组织正式推荐的东方医学教育专家组成。问卷调查包括CSE的潜在内容和详细的实施策略。成立了小组委员会,讨论关于采用全面发展战略的关切问题,这些问题作为不限成员名额的问题收集。在本研究中,66.7%或更高的一致率被定义为达成共识。结果:专家小组对建议的临床表现和基本临床技能的评估建议了他们的优先事项。为制定韩医资格考试引进CSE的具体实施战略,对10个课题进行了调查,其中9个达成了共识。但是,对引进CSE的时间的同意率很低。小组委员会讨论了对4个临床主题的关注,并提出了可能的解决方案。结论:本研究提供了初步的数据,并提出了一些值得关注的问题,可供讨论将CSE引入韩国中医执业资格考试时参考。
{"title":"Implementation strategy for introducing a clinical skills examination to the Korean Oriental Medicine Licensing Examination: a mixed-method modified Delphi study","authors":"Chan-Young Kwon, Sanghoon Lee, Min Hwangbo, Chungsik Cho, Sangwoo Shin, Dong-Hyeon Kim, Aram Jeong, Hye-Yoon Lee","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.23","DOIUrl":"10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.23","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study investigated the validity of introducing a clinical skills examination (CSE) to the Korean Oriental Medicine Licensing Examination through a mixed-method modified Delphi study. Methods A 3-round Delphi study was conducted between September and November 2022. The expert panel comprised 21 oriental medicine education experts who were officially recommended by relevant institutions and organizations. The questionnaires included potential content for the CSE and a detailed implementation strategy. Subcommittees were formed to discuss concerns around the introduction of the CSE, which were collected as open-ended questions. In this study, a 66.7% or greater agreement rate was defined as achieving a consensus. Results The expert panel’s evaluation of the proposed clinical presentations and basic clinical skills suggested their priorities. Of the 10 items investigated for building a detailed implementation strategy for the introduction of the CSE to the Korean Oriental Medicine Licensing Examination, a consensus was achieved on 9. However, the agreement rate on the timing of the introduction of the CSE was low. Concerns around 4 clinical topics were discussed in the subcommittees, and potential solutions were proposed. Conclusion This study offers preliminary data and raises some concerns that can be used as a reference while discussing the introduction of the CSE to the Korean Oriental Medicine Licensing Examination.","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"20 ","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432826/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10024447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions received the Journal Impact Factor, 4.4 for the first time on June 28, 2023. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions于2023年6月28日首次获得期刊影响因子4.4。
IF 4.4 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-29 DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.21
Sun Huh
{"title":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions received the Journal Impact Factor, 4.4 for the first time on June 28, 2023.","authors":"Sun Huh","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.21","DOIUrl":"10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.21","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"20 ","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432825/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10027332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Relationships between undergraduate medical students' attitudes toward communication skills learning and demographics in Zambia: a survey-based descriptive study. 赞比亚医科大学生沟通技巧学习态度与人口统计学的关系:一项基于调查的描述性研究。
IF 4.4 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.16
Mercy Ijeoma Okwudili Ezeala, John Volk

Purpose: This study aimed to detect relationships between undergraduate students' attitudes toward communication skills learning and demographic variables (such as age, academic year, and gender). Understanding these relationships could provide information for communication skills facilitators and curriculum planners on structuring course delivery and integrating communication skills training into the medical curriculum.

Methods: The descriptive study involved a survey of 369 undergraduate students from 2 medical schools in Zambia who participated in communication skills training stratified by academic year using the Communication Skills Attitude Scale. Data were collected between October and December 2021 and analyzed using IBM SPSS for Windows version 28.0.

Results: One-way analysis of variance revealed a significant difference in attitude between at least 5 academic years. There was a significant difference in attitudes between the 2nd and 5th academic years (t=5.95, P˂0.001). No significant difference in attitudes existed among the academic years on the negative subscale; the 2nd and 3rd (t=3.82, P=0.004), 4th (t=3.61, P=0.011), 5th (t=8.36, P˂0.001), and 6th (t=4.20, P=0.001) academic years showed significant differences on the positive subscale. Age showed no correlation with attitudes. There was a more favorable attitude to learning communication skills among the women participants than among the men participants (P=0.006).

Conclusion: Despite positive general attitudes toward learning communication skills, the difference in attitude between the genders, academic years 2 and 5, and the subsequent classes suggest a re-evaluation of the curriculum and teaching methods to facilitate appropriate course structure according to the academic years and a learning process that addressees gender differences.

目的:本研究旨在探讨大学生沟通技巧学习态度与年龄、学年、性别等人口统计变量的关系。了解这些关系可以为沟通技巧促进者和课程规划者提供信息,以组织课程交付并将沟通技巧培训纳入医学课程。方法:采用《沟通技巧态度量表》对赞比亚2所医学院369名按学年分层进行沟通技巧培训的本科生进行描述性研究。数据收集于2021年10月至12月,使用IBM SPSS for Windows version 28.0进行分析。结果:单因素方差分析显示,至少在5个学年之间,学生的态度存在显著差异。第二学年和第五学年的态度差异有统计学意义(t=5.95, P小于0.001)。在消极分量表上,不同学龄学生的态度差异不显著;第2学年、第3学年(t=3.82, P=0.004)、第4学年(t=3.61, P=0.011)、第5学年(t=8.36, P小于0.001)、第6学年(t=4.20, P=0.001)在积极分量表上存在显著差异。年龄与态度没有相关性。女性参与者对学习沟通技巧的态度比男性参与者更有利(P=0.006)。结论:尽管对学习沟通技巧的总体态度是积极的,但性别之间、二、五学年以及随后的班级之间的态度差异表明,需要重新评估课程和教学方法,以促进根据学年适当的课程结构和解决性别差异的学习过程。
{"title":"Relationships between undergraduate medical students' attitudes toward communication skills learning and demographics in Zambia: a survey-based descriptive study.","authors":"Mercy Ijeoma Okwudili Ezeala,&nbsp;John Volk","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.16","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to detect relationships between undergraduate students' attitudes toward communication skills learning and demographic variables (such as age, academic year, and gender). Understanding these relationships could provide information for communication skills facilitators and curriculum planners on structuring course delivery and integrating communication skills training into the medical curriculum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The descriptive study involved a survey of 369 undergraduate students from 2 medical schools in Zambia who participated in communication skills training stratified by academic year using the Communication Skills Attitude Scale. Data were collected between October and December 2021 and analyzed using IBM SPSS for Windows version 28.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-way analysis of variance revealed a significant difference in attitude between at least 5 academic years. There was a significant difference in attitudes between the 2nd and 5th academic years (t=5.95, P˂0.001). No significant difference in attitudes existed among the academic years on the negative subscale; the 2nd and 3rd (t=3.82, P=0.004), 4th (t=3.61, P=0.011), 5th (t=8.36, P˂0.001), and 6th (t=4.20, P=0.001) academic years showed significant differences on the positive subscale. Age showed no correlation with attitudes. There was a more favorable attitude to learning communication skills among the women participants than among the men participants (P=0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite positive general attitudes toward learning communication skills, the difference in attitude between the genders, academic years 2 and 5, and the subsequent classes suggest a re-evaluation of the curriculum and teaching methods to facilitate appropriate course structure according to the academic years and a learning process that addressees gender differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"20 ","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10315251/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10103011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of medical school faculty members' educational performance in Korea in 2022 through analysis of the promotion regulations: a mixed methods study. 从晋升规定分析的2022年韩国医科大学教员教育绩效评价:混合方法研究。
IF 4.4 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.7
Hye Won Jang, Janghee Park

Purpose: To ensure faculty members' active participation in education in response to growing demand, medical schools should clearly describe educational activities in their promotion regulations. This study analyzed the status of how medical education activities are evaluated in promotion regulations in 2022, in Korea.

Methods: Data were collected from promotion regulations retrieved by searching the websites of 22 medical schools/universities in August 2022. To categorize educational activities and evaluation methods, the Association of American Medical Colleges framework for educational activities was utilized. Correlations between medical schools' characteristics and the evaluation of medical educational activities were analyzed.

Results: We defined 6 categories, including teaching, development of education products, education administration and service, scholarship in education, student affairs, and others, and 20 activities with 57 sub-activities. The average number of included activities was highest in the development of education products category and lowest in the scholarship in education category. The weight adjustment factors of medical educational activities were the characteristics of the target subjects and faculty members, the number of involved faculty members, and the difficulty of activities. Private medical schools tended to have more educational activities in the regulations than public medical schools. The greater the number of faculty members, the greater the number of educational activities in the education administration and service categories.

Conclusion: Medical schools included various medical education activities and their evaluation methods in promotion regulations in Korea. This study provides basic data for improving the rewarding system for efforts of medical faculty members in education.

目的:为了确保教师积极参与教育以应对日益增长的需求,医学院应在其晋升条例中明确描述教育活动。本研究分析了韩国2022年晋升规定中对医学教育活动的评价现状。方法:数据来源于22所医学院校网站检索到的2022年8月的促销条例。为了对教育活动进行分类和评估方法,采用了美国医学院协会的教育活动框架。分析了医学院校特色与医学教育活动评价的相关性。结果:我们定义了教学、教育产品开发、教育行政与服务、教育奖学金、学生事务等6个类别,20个活动,57个子活动。教育产品开发领域的平均活动次数最多,教育奖学金领域的平均活动次数最少。医学教育活动的权重调整因子为目标学科和教师的特点、参与教师的人数和活动的难度。私立医学院往往比公立医学院有更多的教育活动。教师人数越多,教育行政和服务类别的教育活动就越多。结论:韩国医学院校在晋升条例中纳入了各种医学教育活动及其评价方法。本研究为完善医学教师教育工作的奖励制度提供了基础数据。
{"title":"Evaluation of medical school faculty members' educational performance in Korea in 2022 through analysis of the promotion regulations: a mixed methods study.","authors":"Hye Won Jang,&nbsp;Janghee Park","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To ensure faculty members' active participation in education in response to growing demand, medical schools should clearly describe educational activities in their promotion regulations. This study analyzed the status of how medical education activities are evaluated in promotion regulations in 2022, in Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from promotion regulations retrieved by searching the websites of 22 medical schools/universities in August 2022. To categorize educational activities and evaluation methods, the Association of American Medical Colleges framework for educational activities was utilized. Correlations between medical schools' characteristics and the evaluation of medical educational activities were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We defined 6 categories, including teaching, development of education products, education administration and service, scholarship in education, student affairs, and others, and 20 activities with 57 sub-activities. The average number of included activities was highest in the development of education products category and lowest in the scholarship in education category. The weight adjustment factors of medical educational activities were the characteristics of the target subjects and faculty members, the number of involved faculty members, and the difficulty of activities. Private medical schools tended to have more educational activities in the regulations than public medical schools. The greater the number of faculty members, the greater the number of educational activities in the education administration and service categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Medical schools included various medical education activities and their evaluation methods in promotion regulations in Korea. This study provides basic data for improving the rewarding system for efforts of medical faculty members in education.</p>","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"20 ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067332/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9240555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1