Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00076-0
Marilea Polk Fried (Acquisitions Editor)
{"title":"JNR Guide for Authors","authors":"Marilea Polk Fried (Acquisitions Editor)","doi":"10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00076-0","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00076-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 57-59"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142658465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00069-3
Ellen Lanser Mayr MA (Managing Editor)
{"title":"A Banner Year for JNR","authors":"Ellen Lanser Mayr MA (Managing Editor)","doi":"10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00069-3","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00069-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 3-4"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142658410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00071-1
Angela M. McNelis PhD, RN, CNE, ANEF, FAAN (Professor and Assistant Dean), Kristina T. Dreifuerst PhD, RN, CNE, ANEF, FAAN (Professor and Director of the PhD Program), Carol Braungart DNP, RN (Director), Sarah L. Beebe PhD, APRN, CNM, WHNPr, CHSE (Graduate Medical Education Simulation Lab Program Manager), Majeda M. El-Banna PhD, RN, CNE, ANEF (Dean), Mary S. Dietrich PhD, MS (Professor)
Background
Innovations in nursing education are crucial for developing new learning approaches to ensure quality preparation and an adequate number of nurse practitioners (NPs). This necessity prompts exploration and implementation of alternative clinical educational approaches, such as screen-based simulation (SBS), to address challenges posed by limited clinical sites and preceptors.
Purpose
The study aim was to compare the effectiveness of SBS with that of traditional precepted clinical experiences in students’ attainment of mastery of knowledge in the domains of assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and evaluation across the pediatric, adolescent, adult, and geriatric populations.
Methods
A quasi-experimental, pretest/posttest design was employed. Family NP (FNP) students from two nursing schools participated, with 95 in the experimental (SBS) group and 65 in the control (traditional) group. Participants entered the study after completing their required clinical hours for certification. Over 5 weeks, the experimental group completed 70 hours of additional SBS and the control group completed 70 hours of additional traditional clinical experiences. All participants completed a demographic survey. Mastery of knowledge was measured using the Diagnostic Readiness Test (DRT), which was collected before (pretest) and after (posttest) the 5-week intervention period.
Results
No statistically significant differences were found between groups in DRT domain or population scores from pre- to posttest, except in the adolescent population, for which the control group had higher scores. There was no significant difference in the likelihood of attaining proficiency in domains or populations between the experimental and control groups at posttest.
Conclusion
SBS proved to be an effective teaching and learning approach and should be considered a viable substitute for traditional precepted clinical experiences, particularly in situations where students have limited access to quality clinical sites, preceptors, or certain populations.
{"title":"Using Screen-Based Simulation in Family Nurse Practitioner Education","authors":"Angela M. McNelis PhD, RN, CNE, ANEF, FAAN (Professor and Assistant Dean), Kristina T. Dreifuerst PhD, RN, CNE, ANEF, FAAN (Professor and Director of the PhD Program), Carol Braungart DNP, RN (Director), Sarah L. Beebe PhD, APRN, CNM, WHNPr, CHSE (Graduate Medical Education Simulation Lab Program Manager), Majeda M. El-Banna PhD, RN, CNE, ANEF (Dean), Mary S. Dietrich PhD, MS (Professor)","doi":"10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00071-1","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00071-1","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Innovations in nursing education are crucial for developing new learning approaches to ensure quality preparation and an adequate number of nurse practitioners (NPs). This necessity prompts exploration and implementation of alternative clinical educational approaches, such as screen-based simulation (SBS), to address challenges posed by limited clinical sites and preceptors.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The study aim was to compare the effectiveness of SBS with that of traditional precepted clinical experiences in students’ attainment of mastery of knowledge in the domains of assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and evaluation across the pediatric, adolescent, adult, and geriatric populations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A quasi-experimental, pretest/posttest design was employed. Family NP (FNP) students from two nursing schools participated, with 95 in the experimental (SBS) group and 65 in the control (traditional) group. Participants entered the study after completing their required clinical hours for certification. Over 5 weeks, the experimental group completed 70 hours of additional SBS and the control group completed 70 hours of additional traditional clinical experiences. All participants completed a demographic survey. Mastery of knowledge was measured using the Diagnostic Readiness Test (DRT), which was collected before (pretest) and after (posttest) the 5-week intervention period.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No statistically significant differences were found between groups in DRT domain or population scores from pre- to posttest, except in the adolescent population, for which the control group had higher scores. There was no significant difference in the likelihood of attaining proficiency in domains or populations between the experimental and control groups at posttest.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>SBS proved to be an effective teaching and learning approach and should be considered a viable substitute for traditional precepted clinical experiences, particularly in situations where students have limited access to quality clinical sites, preceptors, or certain populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 16-22"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142658412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00073-5
Karen J. Foli PhD, RN, ANEF, FAAN (Professor Emerita), Yitong Wang MS, RN (Doctoral Student), Nicole Adams PhD, RN, CEN (Associate Research Professor), Jeffrey Coto DNP, MS-CNS, RN, NPD-BC, CCRN, CPCO (Chief Compliance and Strategic Officer)
Background
Nurses’ substance use (SU) threatens the well-being of nurses as well as patient safety and may precipitate disciplinary actions by state boards of nursing (BONs). Given nurses’ maladaptive behaviors triggered by SU, an in-depth understanding of nurses’ personal, professional, and regulatory experiences is needed.
Purpose
The purpose of the present study was to conduct a grounded theory study of nurses who are in recovery from substance use disorder within the regulatory context. Using a constructivist approach, the overall research question was as follows: What are the lived experiences of nurses who become dependent on substances and interface with the regulatory world of nursing practice?
Methods
Interviews with 41 nurses from across the United States were recorded via Zoom and archived in a password-protected repository. In pre-interview surveys, nurses responded to demographic items, license status, items related to SU and monitoring programs, and questionnaires to measure resilience, posttraumatic growth, and organizational support.
Results
Four global themes emerged: (1) Board of Nursing: “The Great and Powerful Oz”; (2) The Tangible and Intangible Costs of Monitoring; (3) Finding Their Way/What Is Needed; and (4) Trauma, Shame, and Stigma: “Never Thought It Would Happen to Me.” Additionally, a model is proposed with eight semi-linear steps that range from “Confrontation and Contact With Employer/State BON” to “Making Sense of It All/Giving Back.”
Conclusion
The middle-range theory of nurses in SU recovery outlines conceptual relationships that can be empirically tested. Recommendations describe compassionate, informed interventions for nurses, healthcare organizations and regulatory bodies to enhance both nurse well-being and patient safety.
{"title":"A Middle-Range Theory of Nurses in Recovery From Substance Use","authors":"Karen J. Foli PhD, RN, ANEF, FAAN (Professor Emerita), Yitong Wang MS, RN (Doctoral Student), Nicole Adams PhD, RN, CEN (Associate Research Professor), Jeffrey Coto DNP, MS-CNS, RN, NPD-BC, CCRN, CPCO (Chief Compliance and Strategic Officer)","doi":"10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00073-5","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00073-5","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nurses’ substance use (SU) threatens the well-being of nurses as well as patient safety and may precipitate disciplinary actions by state boards of nursing (BONs). Given nurses’ maladaptive behaviors triggered by SU, an in-depth understanding of nurses’ personal, professional, and regulatory experiences is needed.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of the present study was to conduct a grounded theory study of nurses who are in recovery from substance use disorder within the regulatory context. Using a constructivist approach, the overall research question was as follows: What are the lived experiences of nurses who become dependent on substances and interface with the regulatory world of nursing practice?</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Interviews with 41 nurses from across the United States were recorded via Zoom and archived in a password-protected repository. In pre-interview surveys, nurses responded to demographic items, license status, items related to SU and monitoring programs, and questionnaires to measure resilience, posttraumatic growth, and organizational support.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four global themes emerged: (1) Board of Nursing: “The Great and Powerful Oz”; (2) The Tangible and Intangible Costs of Monitoring; (3) Finding Their Way/What Is Needed; and (4) Trauma, Shame, and Stigma: “Never Thought It Would Happen to Me.” Additionally, a model is proposed with eight semi-linear steps that range from “Confrontation and Contact With Employer/State BON” to “Making Sense of It All/Giving Back.”</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The middle-range theory of nurses in SU recovery outlines conceptual relationships that can be empirically tested. Recommendations describe compassionate, informed interventions for nurses, healthcare organizations and regulatory bodies to enhance both nurse well-being and patient safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 33-46"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142658414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00072-3
Amany Farag PhD, RN (Associate Professor), Linda Scott PhD, RN, FAAN (Professor and Dean), Yelena Perkhounkova PhD (Statistician), Peter James Abad MSc, RN (doctoral student), Maria Hein MSW (Data Manager)
Background
Occupational fatigue is a pressing concern among shift workers, notably nurses, leading to substantial costs related to lost productivity and sick leave. Intershift recovery (IR) is pivotal in preventing acute fatigue (AF) from evolving into chronic fatigue (CF). However, few studies have been conducted to evaluate factors associated with IR and examine its mediating role between AF and CF.
Purpose
To evaluate factors associated with nurses’ IR and IR’s mediating effect between AF and CF.
Methods
Findings reported in this article are part of a larger mixed-methods study. Data for the parent study were collected from 1,137 registered nurses (a 56.1% response rate) working in eight midwestern hospitals’ inpatient and critical care units. The study variables were measured using previously validated self-reported surveys. Multiple regression analysis was used to assess correlates of IR, and a path analysis was used to evaluate the mediating effect of IR.
Results
Daytime sleepiness and three work environment variables (staffing and resource adequacy, nurse-physician relationship, and leadership support) were the strongest predictors of IR. Adequate IR mitigated AF from progressing to CF.
Conclusion
The findings support the mediating role of IR in the progression of AC to CF. Modifiable personal and work environment variables are essential to enhance IR. Thus, hospital leadership should intervene by addressing the modifiable variables to develop appropriate policies to enhance their staff’s IR.
背景职业疲劳是轮班工人(尤其是护士)迫切需要解决的问题,它导致了与生产力损失和病假相关的大量成本。班间恢复(IR)是防止急性疲劳(AF)演变为慢性疲劳(CF)的关键。目的 评估与护士班间恢复相关的因素以及班间恢复在急性疲劳和慢性疲劳之间的中介作用。方法 本文报告的结果是一项大型混合方法研究的一部分。母研究的数据来自于在八家中西部医院的住院部和重症监护室工作的 1,137 名注册护士(回复率为 56.1%)。研究变量采用之前经过验证的自我报告调查进行测量。结果白天嗜睡和三个工作环境变量(人员配备和资源充足性、护士与医生的关系以及领导支持)是预测 IR 的最主要因素。结论研究结果支持IR在AF发展为CF过程中的中介作用。可改变的个人和工作环境变量对提高 IR 至关重要。因此,医院领导应针对可改变的变量进行干预,制定适当的政策来提高员工的IR。
{"title":"Exploring Factors Influencing Nurses’ Intershift Recovery and Its Effects on Progression From Acute Fatigue to Chronic Fatigue","authors":"Amany Farag PhD, RN (Associate Professor), Linda Scott PhD, RN, FAAN (Professor and Dean), Yelena Perkhounkova PhD (Statistician), Peter James Abad MSc, RN (doctoral student), Maria Hein MSW (Data Manager)","doi":"10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00072-3","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00072-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Occupational fatigue is a pressing concern among shift workers, notably nurses, leading to substantial costs related to lost productivity and sick leave. Intershift recovery (IR) is pivotal in preventing acute fatigue (AF) from evolving into chronic fatigue (CF). However, few studies have been conducted to evaluate factors associated with IR and examine its mediating role between AF and CF.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate factors associated with nurses’ IR and IR’s mediating effect between AF and CF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Findings reported in this article are part of a larger mixed-methods study. Data for the parent study were collected from 1,137 registered nurses (a 56.1% response rate) working in eight midwestern hospitals’ inpatient and critical care units. The study variables were measured using previously validated self-reported surveys. Multiple regression analysis was used to assess correlates of IR, and a path analysis was used to evaluate the mediating effect of IR.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Daytime sleepiness and three work environment variables (staffing and resource adequacy, nurse-physician relationship, and leadership support) were the strongest predictors of IR. Adequate IR mitigated AF from progressing to CF.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings support the mediating role of IR in the progression of AC to CF. Modifiable personal and work environment variables are essential to enhance IR. Thus, hospital leadership should intervene by addressing the modifiable variables to develop appropriate policies to enhance their staff’s IR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 23-32"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142658413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00074-7
Louise Aerts MBA (Chief Officer), Joe Gallagher Kwunuhmen BA, Honorary LLD (Chief Executive Officer), Cynthia Johansen MSc, MAL (Chief Executive Officer and Registrar), Sabrina Luke MPH, PhD (Director)
In June 2020, media outlets in British Columbia (B.C.), Canada, unearthed complaints about overtly racist behavior by healthcare professionals, including nurses, in some B.C. hospital emergency departments. B.C.’s Minister of Health commissioned an independent review to investigate the allegations. Although the review did not confirm the specific allegations, it did find evidence of insidious and systemic Indigenous-specific racism in the B.C. healthcare system. This case study outlines the steps that the B.C. College of Nurses and Midwives is undertaking to eliminate Indigenous-specific racism within the college itself, among its registrants, and in the broader B.C. healthcare system. It may help guide regulatory colleges undertaking anti-racist approaches in the regulation of health professionals.
{"title":"A Continuous Journey: Addressing Indigenous-Specific Racism as a Nursing and Midwifery Regulator","authors":"Louise Aerts MBA (Chief Officer), Joe Gallagher Kwunuhmen BA, Honorary LLD (Chief Executive Officer), Cynthia Johansen MSc, MAL (Chief Executive Officer and Registrar), Sabrina Luke MPH, PhD (Director)","doi":"10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00074-7","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00074-7","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In June 2020, media outlets in British Columbia (B.C.), Canada, unearthed complaints about overtly racist behavior by healthcare professionals, including nurses, in some B.C. hospital emergency departments. B.C.’s Minister of Health commissioned an independent review to investigate the allegations. Although the review did not confirm the specific allegations, it did find evidence of insidious and systemic Indigenous-specific racism in the B.C. healthcare system. This case study outlines the steps that the B.C. College of Nurses and Midwives is undertaking to eliminate Indigenous-specific racism within the college itself, among its registrants, and in the broader B.C. healthcare system. It may help guide regulatory colleges undertaking anti-racist approaches in the regulation of health professionals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 47-53"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142658415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00070-X
Melanie Arnold BSN, RN (PhD student), Shawn Gallagher PhD, PMHNP-BC, PMHCNS-BC, FNP-BC (Assistant Clinical Professor), Kristina Medvescek MPH (Data Scientist), Jessica G. Rainbow PhD, RN, CNE (Associate Professor and Director of Clinical Research Partnerships)
Background
Many Americans, including nurses, use cannabis for relief from pain, stress, and anxiety. The evolving landscape of medical and recreational cannabis use has required a review of federal regulations and employment policies concerning nurse cannabis use, particularly in relation to patient care.
Purpose
This qualitative study, as part of a larger mixed-methods research project, explores nurses’ experiences using cannabis and the impact of cannabis use on their professional and personal lives.
Methods
This study used a qualitative descriptive design to examine nurses’ lived experiences using cannabis. Participants were recruited through a nationwide survey and, through open-ended questions and face-to-face interviews, described their attitudes toward and beliefs about cannabis use.
Results
Analysis of the 938 free responses and 13 interviews revealed four key themes: the perception that cannabis is a safer alternative to other substances, the need for distinction between impairment and responsible use, the role of cannabis in symptom management (e.g., sleep and mental health conditions), and the enduring taboo surrounding cannabis use among nurses.
Conclusion
The findings highlight the need for updated guidelines and policies that consider nurses’ nuanced experiences with cannabis. This research emphasizes the need to address the stigma associated with cannabis use and to provide support for nurses to manage stress and mental health issues safely and effectively. By understanding nurses’ perceptions of the impact of cannabis on their professional practice and personal well-being, this study aims to inform the development of regulations that balance patient safety with the well-being of healthcare providers.
{"title":"Nurses’ Perceptions of the Professional and Personal Impacts of Cannabis Use","authors":"Melanie Arnold BSN, RN (PhD student), Shawn Gallagher PhD, PMHNP-BC, PMHCNS-BC, FNP-BC (Assistant Clinical Professor), Kristina Medvescek MPH (Data Scientist), Jessica G. Rainbow PhD, RN, CNE (Associate Professor and Director of Clinical Research Partnerships)","doi":"10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00070-X","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00070-X","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Many Americans, including nurses, use cannabis for relief from pain, stress, and anxiety. The evolving landscape of medical and recreational cannabis use has required a review of federal regulations and employment policies concerning nurse cannabis use, particularly in relation to patient care.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This qualitative study, as part of a larger mixed-methods research project, explores nurses’ experiences using cannabis and the impact of cannabis use on their professional and personal lives.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study used a qualitative descriptive design to examine nurses’ lived experiences using cannabis. Participants were recruited through a nationwide survey and, through open-ended questions and face-to-face interviews, described their attitudes toward and beliefs about cannabis use.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Analysis of the 938 free responses and 13 interviews revealed four key themes: the perception that cannabis is a safer alternative to other substances, the need for distinction between impairment and responsible use, the role of cannabis in symptom management (e.g., sleep and mental health conditions), and the enduring taboo surrounding cannabis use among nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings highlight the need for updated guidelines and policies that consider nurses’ nuanced experiences with cannabis. This research emphasizes the need to address the stigma associated with cannabis use and to provide support for nurses to manage stress and mental health issues safely and effectively. By understanding nurses’ perceptions of the impact of cannabis on their professional practice and personal well-being, this study aims to inform the development of regulations that balance patient safety with the well-being of healthcare providers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 5-15"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142658411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00050-4
Maryann Alexander PhD, RN, FAAN (Editor-in-Chief)
{"title":"NCSBN’s President Reflects on 25 Years in Regulation","authors":"Maryann Alexander PhD, RN, FAAN (Editor-in-Chief)","doi":"10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00050-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00050-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":"15 2","pages":"Pages 3-4"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141582364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00052-8
Khadejah F. Mahmoud PhD, MSN (Lecturer), Deborah S. Finnell PhD, RN, CARN-AP, FAAN (Professor Emerita), Susan M. Sereika PhD (Professor), Dawn Lindsay PhD, Ann M. Mitchell PhD, RN, AHN-BC, FIAAN, FAAN (Professor)
Background
Alcohol and opioid use have significant impacts economically and socially at the global and national levels and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In 2021, 94% of individuals with substance use disorders reported not receiving any specialty treatment. Thus, building the nursing workforce to care for this population is important.
Purpose
To compare the demographics, personal attitudes, professional attitudes, and motivation among three nursing specialty groups (medical-surgical, psychiatric–mental health, and addiction) relative to providing care to persons with alcohol and opioid use problems.
Methods
A nationwide online survey was used for this cross-sectional, correlational study. Nurses were recruited from four professional national nursing organizations representative of the three nursing specialty groups. The survey included questions about nurses’ demographics, personal attitudes, professional attitudes, and motivation relative to providing alcohol- and opioid-related care.
Results
The study revealed that among the 460 included respondents, nurses’ demographics differed significantly between the three nursing specialty groups in terms of age, years of experience in nursing, primary workplace, and highest degree obtained in nursing. In addition, there were significant differences among the three nursing specialty groups regarding familiarity, perceived dangerousness, social distance, personal responsibility beliefs, and disease model. All professional attitudes and motivation associated with alcohol- and opioid-related care also differed significantly among the three groups.
Conclusion
The study findings emphasize the need to prepare all nurses with the needed knowledge and skills to manage substance use–related problems within their workplace.
{"title":"Comparing Medical-Surgical, Psychiatric–Mental Health, and Addiction Specialty Nurses’ Personal Attitudes, Professional Attitudes, and Motivation Toward Working With Individuals With Alcohol and Opioid Use Problems: Implications for the Nursing Workforce Using a Nationwide Sample","authors":"Khadejah F. Mahmoud PhD, MSN (Lecturer), Deborah S. Finnell PhD, RN, CARN-AP, FAAN (Professor Emerita), Susan M. Sereika PhD (Professor), Dawn Lindsay PhD, Ann M. Mitchell PhD, RN, AHN-BC, FIAAN, FAAN (Professor)","doi":"10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00052-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00052-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Alcohol and opioid use have significant impacts economically and socially at the global and national levels and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In 2021, 94% of individuals with substance use disorders reported not receiving any specialty treatment. Thus, building the nursing workforce to care for this population is important.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To compare the demographics, personal attitudes, professional attitudes, and motivation among three nursing specialty groups (medical-surgical, psychiatric–mental health, and addiction) relative to providing care to persons with alcohol and opioid use problems.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A nationwide online survey was used for this cross-sectional, correlational study. Nurses were recruited from four professional national nursing organizations representative of the three nursing specialty groups. The survey included questions about nurses’ demographics, personal attitudes, professional attitudes, and motivation relative to providing alcohol- and opioid-related care.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study revealed that among the 460 included respondents, nurses’ demographics differed significantly between the three nursing specialty groups in terms of age, years of experience in nursing, primary workplace, and highest degree obtained in nursing. In addition, there were significant differences among the three nursing specialty groups regarding familiarity, perceived dangerousness, social distance, personal responsibility beliefs, and disease model. All professional attitudes and motivation associated with alcohol- and opioid-related care also differed significantly among the three groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study findings emphasize the need to prepare all nurses with the needed knowledge and skills to manage substance use–related problems within their workplace.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":"15 2","pages":"Pages 17-27"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141582369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}