Pub Date : 2023-07-27DOI: 10.1177/15345084231189893
Faith G. Miller, Anna Li
Implementation of social and emotional learning (SEL) programs and practices is becoming increasingly prevalent in Pre-K through Grade 12 educational settings. Research provides robust evidence to support positive outcomes associated with SEL implementation; however, we also know that implementation can be impacted by a variety of different individual and organizational factors. Teacher beliefs can influence how teachers implement SEL programming and represent an important area of study. The purpose of this study was to explore evidence for the technical adequacy of the Teacher SEL Beliefs Scale by examining the internal structure, internal consistency, and relations between subscale scores and teacher self-reported implementation fidelity of the Second Step SEL program. Confirmatory factor analysis of 103 teachers’ responses indicated that the three-factor solution found by prior authors, consisting of Comfort, Commitment, and Culture subscales, was also supported in the current sample. Moreover, ordinal logistic regression analyses suggested that the Comfort factor was significantly associated with how consistently teachers reported implementing the Second Step program. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.
{"title":"Evidence for the Technical Adequacy of the Teacher Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) Beliefs Scale","authors":"Faith G. Miller, Anna Li","doi":"10.1177/15345084231189893","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084231189893","url":null,"abstract":"Implementation of social and emotional learning (SEL) programs and practices is becoming increasingly prevalent in Pre-K through Grade 12 educational settings. Research provides robust evidence to support positive outcomes associated with SEL implementation; however, we also know that implementation can be impacted by a variety of different individual and organizational factors. Teacher beliefs can influence how teachers implement SEL programming and represent an important area of study. The purpose of this study was to explore evidence for the technical adequacy of the Teacher SEL Beliefs Scale by examining the internal structure, internal consistency, and relations between subscale scores and teacher self-reported implementation fidelity of the Second Step SEL program. Confirmatory factor analysis of 103 teachers’ responses indicated that the three-factor solution found by prior authors, consisting of Comfort, Commitment, and Culture subscales, was also supported in the current sample. Moreover, ordinal logistic regression analyses suggested that the Comfort factor was significantly associated with how consistently teachers reported implementing the Second Step program. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46264,"journal":{"name":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41678469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-28DOI: 10.1177/15345084231182718
Seohyeon Choi, Emma Shanahan, Jechun An, Kristen L. McMaster
The purpose of this study was to examine the technical features of slopes produced from the curriculum-based measurement in writing (CBM-W) word dictation task. Seventy-nine elementary students in the U.S. Midwest with intensive learning needs responded to weekly word dictation probes across 20 weeks; responses were scored for correct letter sequences (CLS). Scores showed evidence of high reliability and sensitivity to growth in a short period. Linear mixed modeling revealed that students gained an average of 0.91 CLS for each additional week of instruction. Initial writing levels and growth rates did not significantly differ depending on students’ demographic characteristics. Based on these findings, we illustrate how word dictation slopes can be used as indicators of writing growth for students with intensive learning needs.
{"title":"Monitoring Elementary Students’ Progress Using Word Dictation: Technical Features of Slope and Growth Analysis","authors":"Seohyeon Choi, Emma Shanahan, Jechun An, Kristen L. McMaster","doi":"10.1177/15345084231182718","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084231182718","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to examine the technical features of slopes produced from the curriculum-based measurement in writing (CBM-W) word dictation task. Seventy-nine elementary students in the U.S. Midwest with intensive learning needs responded to weekly word dictation probes across 20 weeks; responses were scored for correct letter sequences (CLS). Scores showed evidence of high reliability and sensitivity to growth in a short period. Linear mixed modeling revealed that students gained an average of 0.91 CLS for each additional week of instruction. Initial writing levels and growth rates did not significantly differ depending on students’ demographic characteristics. Based on these findings, we illustrate how word dictation slopes can be used as indicators of writing growth for students with intensive learning needs.","PeriodicalId":46264,"journal":{"name":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49482544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-16DOI: 10.1177/15345084231180224
Steven L. Powell
The Early Identification System–Student Report (EIS-SR) is a 34-item measure of social-emotional functioning that is designed to be a low-cost universal screening tool. To date, studies of the EIS-SR demonstrate promising psychometric properties, but these properties have not yet been assessed in groups of children from historically underrepresented populations. The current study seeks to help close this gap in the literature by examining the evidence of validity related to the internal structure of the EIS-SR in a sample of Grades 3 through 8 students in the southwestern United States. Analyses indicated mixed findings regarding the model fit of the EIS-SR in the obtained sample, which implies that more data regarding its measurement invariance across diverse populations are needed.
{"title":"A Psychometric Analysis of the Early Identification System–Student Report in a Sample of Southwestern U.S. Students","authors":"Steven L. Powell","doi":"10.1177/15345084231180224","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084231180224","url":null,"abstract":"The Early Identification System–Student Report (EIS-SR) is a 34-item measure of social-emotional functioning that is designed to be a low-cost universal screening tool. To date, studies of the EIS-SR demonstrate promising psychometric properties, but these properties have not yet been assessed in groups of children from historically underrepresented populations. The current study seeks to help close this gap in the literature by examining the evidence of validity related to the internal structure of the EIS-SR in a sample of Grades 3 through 8 students in the southwestern United States. Analyses indicated mixed findings regarding the model fit of the EIS-SR in the obtained sample, which implies that more data regarding its measurement invariance across diverse populations are needed.","PeriodicalId":46264,"journal":{"name":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42727950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-15DOI: 10.1177/15345084231180477
Anniette F. Maldonado, A. Fischer, Hannah Michael Wright, Rylee L. Jensen, Ashley Coombs, Sara N. Mathis, Keely M. Lundy, Alyson Funn, Leanne S. Hawken, Keith C. Radley, Lauren Perez
The literature has identified the use of data-based, problem-solving as an essential element in the promotion of positive behavior interventions and supports (PBIS) within the classroom. The Components of a Successful Classroom (CSC) tool is an instrument which has undergone initial validation to support its use for measuring critical features of Tier 1. This study provides initial support for the validation of this classroom management observation tool as part of a problem-solving consultation framework by examining the extent to which items on the CSC tool sample the constructs of interest in classroom management. Behavioral consultants utilized the tool to evaluate Tier 1 behavior management strategies implemented by teachers in the classroom. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to determine factor structure of the classroom management observation tool. Findings of the EFA supported a unidimensional construct best measured with three factors (i.e., preventive supports, feedback provision and engagement, and expectations and consequences). Currently, this tool may be useful to practitioners by guiding general education consultation after identifying main concerns in teacher’s implementation of Tier 1 supports and supporting implementation of PBIS practices in the classroom.
{"title":"Components of a Successful Classroom: A Factor Analysis for Initial Validation of a Measure Assessing Tier One Classroom Management","authors":"Anniette F. Maldonado, A. Fischer, Hannah Michael Wright, Rylee L. Jensen, Ashley Coombs, Sara N. Mathis, Keely M. Lundy, Alyson Funn, Leanne S. Hawken, Keith C. Radley, Lauren Perez","doi":"10.1177/15345084231180477","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084231180477","url":null,"abstract":"The literature has identified the use of data-based, problem-solving as an essential element in the promotion of positive behavior interventions and supports (PBIS) within the classroom. The Components of a Successful Classroom (CSC) tool is an instrument which has undergone initial validation to support its use for measuring critical features of Tier 1. This study provides initial support for the validation of this classroom management observation tool as part of a problem-solving consultation framework by examining the extent to which items on the CSC tool sample the constructs of interest in classroom management. Behavioral consultants utilized the tool to evaluate Tier 1 behavior management strategies implemented by teachers in the classroom. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to determine factor structure of the classroom management observation tool. Findings of the EFA supported a unidimensional construct best measured with three factors (i.e., preventive supports, feedback provision and engagement, and expectations and consequences). Currently, this tool may be useful to practitioners by guiding general education consultation after identifying main concerns in teacher’s implementation of Tier 1 supports and supporting implementation of PBIS practices in the classroom.","PeriodicalId":46264,"journal":{"name":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42321018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-15DOI: 10.1177/15345084231179442
Sarah J. Conoyer, Kyle Wagner, Kristen K. Janssen, Jeremy D. Jewell, Elizabeth L. W. McKenney
As content literacy intervention is expanded in schools, data-based decision-making practices need to also advance, especially in the areas of science. Vocabulary-matching curriculum-based measures (VM-CBM) may allow educators to identify students needing additional support in science vocabulary to assist with using and comprehending disciplinary language. Typically, VM-CBMs have been given in a one-page format, but there has been little investigation of modified presentation of VM items. Participants were 77 fourth grade students from a U.S. Midwestern rural school district. Students from four different classrooms were administered either typical one-page or multipage VM-CBM forms. Multipage forms produced strong alternate form reliability (r = .92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [.85, .96]). Typical forms produced a moderate reliability coefficient (r = .58, 95% CI = [.32, .76]). Regarding concurrent validity, multipage forms were also strongly correlated (r = .71, 95% CI = [.50, .84]; r = .72, 95% CI = [.51, .85]) while typical forms were weakly correlated (r = .40, 95% CI = [.10, .64]; r = .47, 95% CI = [.17, .69]) with a standardized state science assessment. The multipage format appears promising; however, further item level analysis is needed to determine the most efficient way to screen and support students in elementary science literacy.
{"title":"Exploring Curriculum-Based Measurement in Elementary Science: Investigating Two Vocabulary-Matching Formats","authors":"Sarah J. Conoyer, Kyle Wagner, Kristen K. Janssen, Jeremy D. Jewell, Elizabeth L. W. McKenney","doi":"10.1177/15345084231179442","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084231179442","url":null,"abstract":"As content literacy intervention is expanded in schools, data-based decision-making practices need to also advance, especially in the areas of science. Vocabulary-matching curriculum-based measures (VM-CBM) may allow educators to identify students needing additional support in science vocabulary to assist with using and comprehending disciplinary language. Typically, VM-CBMs have been given in a one-page format, but there has been little investigation of modified presentation of VM items. Participants were 77 fourth grade students from a U.S. Midwestern rural school district. Students from four different classrooms were administered either typical one-page or multipage VM-CBM forms. Multipage forms produced strong alternate form reliability (r = .92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [.85, .96]). Typical forms produced a moderate reliability coefficient (r = .58, 95% CI = [.32, .76]). Regarding concurrent validity, multipage forms were also strongly correlated (r = .71, 95% CI = [.50, .84]; r = .72, 95% CI = [.51, .85]) while typical forms were weakly correlated (r = .40, 95% CI = [.10, .64]; r = .47, 95% CI = [.17, .69]) with a standardized state science assessment. The multipage format appears promising; however, further item level analysis is needed to determine the most efficient way to screen and support students in elementary science literacy.","PeriodicalId":46264,"journal":{"name":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42622029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-12DOI: 10.1177/15345084231178794
Benjamin J. Lovett, Daniel M. Fienup
Students with disabilities are often given accommodations in testing situations (e.g., extended testing time). However, for many students with high-incidence disabilities, interventions can reduce the need for these accommodations, or serve as a helpful supplement to accommodations. Applied behavior analysis provides a framework for understanding how accommodations alter testing settings, as well as for developing related interventions. We review research on evidence-based interventions that can reduce the need for five common testing accommodations: extended testing time, separate room administration, test breaks, read-aloud, and dictated response. We conclude with suggestions for changes to school-based practice as well as remaining research needs.
{"title":"Using Interventions to Increase Test Access: An Alternative to Accommodations?","authors":"Benjamin J. Lovett, Daniel M. Fienup","doi":"10.1177/15345084231178794","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084231178794","url":null,"abstract":"Students with disabilities are often given accommodations in testing situations (e.g., extended testing time). However, for many students with high-incidence disabilities, interventions can reduce the need for these accommodations, or serve as a helpful supplement to accommodations. Applied behavior analysis provides a framework for understanding how accommodations alter testing settings, as well as for developing related interventions. We review research on evidence-based interventions that can reduce the need for five common testing accommodations: extended testing time, separate room administration, test breaks, read-aloud, and dictated response. We conclude with suggestions for changes to school-based practice as well as remaining research needs.","PeriodicalId":46264,"journal":{"name":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45811643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-04DOI: 10.1177/15345084231178788
Lindsay E. Romano
Disparities in school discipline across lines of race and disability status represent one of the most pressing issues in the field of education today. While there are many factors that perpetuate these disparities, teachers and their approaches to classroom management likely play a role. As evidence emerges on the relationship between race, disability status, and the use of punitive discipline at a national level, less is known about the ways in which teachers’ approaches to classroom management and classroom management assessment influence these trends at the classroom level. This article addresses this by exploring findings from a qualitative study examining classroom management approaches across five focus groups consisting of 25 educators to identify how educators’ management and assessment practices sustain the identities of their students. Based on these findings, recommendations for future research and practice are discussed.
{"title":"Assessment for Equity: Exploring How Secondary Educators’ Utilize Classroom Management and Assessment Practices to Sustain Student Identities","authors":"Lindsay E. Romano","doi":"10.1177/15345084231178788","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084231178788","url":null,"abstract":"Disparities in school discipline across lines of race and disability status represent one of the most pressing issues in the field of education today. While there are many factors that perpetuate these disparities, teachers and their approaches to classroom management likely play a role. As evidence emerges on the relationship between race, disability status, and the use of punitive discipline at a national level, less is known about the ways in which teachers’ approaches to classroom management and classroom management assessment influence these trends at the classroom level. This article addresses this by exploring findings from a qualitative study examining classroom management approaches across five focus groups consisting of 25 educators to identify how educators’ management and assessment practices sustain the identities of their students. Based on these findings, recommendations for future research and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46264,"journal":{"name":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41916713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-03DOI: 10.1177/15345084231175511
Allison F. Gilmour, J. Wehby, J. Boyle, Howard P. Wills, Paul Caldarella
Multitiered systems for supporting students’ behavior in schools rely on teachers using generally effective classroom management strategies, Tier 1 practices. However, few tools exist to easily assess classwide Tier 1 practices. In this brief report, we describe one potential tool, the Classroom Atmosphere Rating Scale–Brief (CARS-B), and assess the properties of the tool using item response theory and multilevel models. We found that most items on the CARS-B had acceptable discriminations and difficulty estimates. Teachers’ CARS-B latent scores were positively associated with student group on-task. We discuss potential changes to the CARS-B and its use in research and practice.
{"title":"A Preliminary Investigation of a Brief Tier 1 Classroom Management Measure","authors":"Allison F. Gilmour, J. Wehby, J. Boyle, Howard P. Wills, Paul Caldarella","doi":"10.1177/15345084231175511","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084231175511","url":null,"abstract":"Multitiered systems for supporting students’ behavior in schools rely on teachers using generally effective classroom management strategies, Tier 1 practices. However, few tools exist to easily assess classwide Tier 1 practices. In this brief report, we describe one potential tool, the Classroom Atmosphere Rating Scale–Brief (CARS-B), and assess the properties of the tool using item response theory and multilevel models. We found that most items on the CARS-B had acceptable discriminations and difficulty estimates. Teachers’ CARS-B latent scores were positively associated with student group on-task. We discuss potential changes to the CARS-B and its use in research and practice.","PeriodicalId":46264,"journal":{"name":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45308454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-22DOI: 10.1177/15345084231174924
Ke Huang, M. Conroy, Patricia A. Snyder, David I. Miller, K. Sutherland
The Social Skills Improvement System–Teacher Rating Scale (SSIS-TRS) has been widely used to measure the social skills and behaviors of children and adolescents that are challenging. Studies examining the psychometric properties of the SSIS-TRS have been conducted, but the dimensional structure and item properties of the SSIS-TRS have not been extensively examined with samples of preschool-age children at risk for social-emotional and behavioral difficulties. This current study was designed to examine (a) the dimensional structure of the Social Skills scale and Problem Behaviors scale of the SSIS-TRS and (b) the item function of the SSIS-TRS using item response theory analyses with data collected from teachers of a sample of 469 preschool-age children at risk for social–emotional and behavioral difficulties. A four-dimensional structure (i.e., Cooperation, Empathy and Relationship, Engagement and Interaction, and Self-Control) and a three-dimensional structure (i.e., Aggression and Defiance, Disruptiveness and Stereotypy, and Withdrawal) were identified for the Social Skills and Problem Behaviors scales, respectively. Item parameters of the SSIS-TRS were estimated using the generalized partial credit model. Item information curves were plotted for individual items; behavior indicators providing higher information for measuring corresponding social skills and problem behaviors constructs were identified. The limitations and implications for the present study are discussed.
{"title":"Examining the Psychometric Integrity of the Social Skills Improvement System Teacher Rating Scale Scores for a Sample of Preschool-Age Children","authors":"Ke Huang, M. Conroy, Patricia A. Snyder, David I. Miller, K. Sutherland","doi":"10.1177/15345084231174924","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084231174924","url":null,"abstract":"The Social Skills Improvement System–Teacher Rating Scale (SSIS-TRS) has been widely used to measure the social skills and behaviors of children and adolescents that are challenging. Studies examining the psychometric properties of the SSIS-TRS have been conducted, but the dimensional structure and item properties of the SSIS-TRS have not been extensively examined with samples of preschool-age children at risk for social-emotional and behavioral difficulties. This current study was designed to examine (a) the dimensional structure of the Social Skills scale and Problem Behaviors scale of the SSIS-TRS and (b) the item function of the SSIS-TRS using item response theory analyses with data collected from teachers of a sample of 469 preschool-age children at risk for social–emotional and behavioral difficulties. A four-dimensional structure (i.e., Cooperation, Empathy and Relationship, Engagement and Interaction, and Self-Control) and a three-dimensional structure (i.e., Aggression and Defiance, Disruptiveness and Stereotypy, and Withdrawal) were identified for the Social Skills and Problem Behaviors scales, respectively. Item parameters of the SSIS-TRS were estimated using the generalized partial credit model. Item information curves were plotted for individual items; behavior indicators providing higher information for measuring corresponding social skills and problem behaviors constructs were identified. The limitations and implications for the present study are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46264,"journal":{"name":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41706817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-28DOI: 10.1177/15345084231170317
Leah Dembitzer, Ryan J. Kettler
To investigate the impact of universal testing accommodations on a computer-based reading comprehension test, accessibility, reliability, and validity were evaluated. Tests with and without accommodations were administered to 131 twelfth-grade students in three schools. Scores on Curriculum-Based Measurement probes determined groups of Students Without Functional Impairment ( n = 83) and Students With Functional Impairment ( n = 44) in the access skill of reading fluency. Results indicated that ability in access skills is associated with use of accommodations, and that high accessibility can assist in removing the impact of construct-irrelevant skill. No score boost or differential boost was found; validity evaluation offered meaningful results. No reliability change was found. The results of this study support child study team members individualizing accommodations to target deficits in access skills, selecting accommodations on criteria other than differential boost, and offering appropriate accommodations more universally.
{"title":"Universally Designed Accommodations on a Reading Comprehension Test: What Do They Accomplish?","authors":"Leah Dembitzer, Ryan J. Kettler","doi":"10.1177/15345084231170317","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084231170317","url":null,"abstract":"To investigate the impact of universal testing accommodations on a computer-based reading comprehension test, accessibility, reliability, and validity were evaluated. Tests with and without accommodations were administered to 131 twelfth-grade students in three schools. Scores on Curriculum-Based Measurement probes determined groups of Students Without Functional Impairment ( n = 83) and Students With Functional Impairment ( n = 44) in the access skill of reading fluency. Results indicated that ability in access skills is associated with use of accommodations, and that high accessibility can assist in removing the impact of construct-irrelevant skill. No score boost or differential boost was found; validity evaluation offered meaningful results. No reliability change was found. The results of this study support child study team members individualizing accommodations to target deficits in access skills, selecting accommodations on criteria other than differential boost, and offering appropriate accommodations more universally.","PeriodicalId":46264,"journal":{"name":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"65474645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：