首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling最新文献

英文 中文
The effects of building and maintaining rapport on cooperative mock eyewitness recall 建立和维持融洽关系对合作模拟目击者回忆的影响
IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Pub Date : 2022-02-25 DOI: 10.1002/jip.1586
Andrea C. F. Wolfs, Danielle Sneyd, Jonathan P. Vallano, Nadja Schreiber Compo, Leanett Reinoso

Although building rapport before an investigative interview is recommended—and sometimes empirically beneficial—to eyewitness memory, no research has experimentally examined the effects of maintaining rapport during a witness interview on adult eyewitness recall. As a result, the present study assessed the impact of rapport on eyewitness recall accuracy by comparing a pre-interview rapport only condition with a maintained rapport condition (where rapport was built before and maintained during the interview) and a no rapport control condition. Results revealed no benefits (or detriments) of building initial rapport—or any additional benefits of maintaining rapport—on witness recall quality, quantity, or ‘don't know’ responses. Our findings suggest that rapport or its maintenance may not directly affect eyewitness recall. However, as rapport is a humane eyewitness interviewing technique with some empirical support, we still advocate for its continued use.

虽然在调查采访前建立融洽的关系是被推荐的——有时在经验上是有益的——对目击者的记忆来说,没有研究在实验中检验在证人采访期间保持融洽关系对成年目击者回忆的影响。因此,本研究评估了融洽关系对目击者回忆准确性的影响,方法是通过比较采访前只有融洽关系的条件、保持融洽关系的条件(在采访前建立并在采访期间保持融洽关系)和没有融洽关系的控制条件。结果显示,在证人回忆的质量、数量或“不知道”回答方面,建立最初的融洽关系或维持融洽关系没有任何好处(或坏处)。我们的研究结果表明,融洽关系或其维持可能不会直接影响目击者的回忆。然而,由于融洽是一种人性化的目击者访谈技术,并有一些经验支持,我们仍然主张继续使用它。
{"title":"The effects of building and maintaining rapport on cooperative mock eyewitness recall","authors":"Andrea C. F. Wolfs,&nbsp;Danielle Sneyd,&nbsp;Jonathan P. Vallano,&nbsp;Nadja Schreiber Compo,&nbsp;Leanett Reinoso","doi":"10.1002/jip.1586","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jip.1586","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although building rapport before an investigative interview is recommended—and sometimes empirically beneficial—to eyewitness memory, no research has experimentally examined the effects of <i>maintaining</i> rapport during a witness interview on adult eyewitness recall. As a result, the present study assessed the impact of rapport on eyewitness recall accuracy by comparing a <i>pre-interview rapport only</i> condition with a <i>maintained rapport</i> condition (where rapport was built before and maintained during the interview) and a <i>no rapport control</i> condition. Results revealed no benefits (or detriments) of building initial rapport—or any additional benefits of maintaining rapport—on witness recall quality, quantity, or ‘don't know’ responses. Our findings suggest that rapport or its maintenance may not directly affect eyewitness recall. However, as rapport is a humane eyewitness interviewing technique with some empirical support, we still advocate for its continued use.</p>","PeriodicalId":46397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling","volume":"19 3","pages":"151-166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43281850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
List of reviewers 审稿人名单
IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Pub Date : 2022-01-21 DOI: 10.1002/jip.1584
{"title":"List of reviewers","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/jip.1584","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1584","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling","volume":"19 1","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jip.1584","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"137952124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding the role of uncertainty and anxiety in police decision-making during the investigation of sudden unexpected deaths in children 了解不确定性和焦虑在调查儿童突然意外死亡期间警察决策中的作用
IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Pub Date : 2021-12-15 DOI: 10.1002/jip.1583
Jonathan Holmes, Laura Boulton, Heather Panter

Existing policing policy offers a rational approach to decision-making with minimal reference to human judgement within child death investigations. This study adopted a mixed methodology to capture decisional processes of 26 serving detective inspectors and detective sergeants whilst responding to an immersive scenario which simulated the first hours of a Sudden and Unexpected Death in Children (SUDC) investigation. Participants were presented with four decision points, during which they were asked to choose from decision options while reflecting upon personal and situational factors influencing that decision. Thematic analysis of responses found that investigators disclosed ‘anxiety’ and ‘uncertainty’ throughout their decision-making during the scenario. In addition, there was no evidence of investigators utilising the models formally advocated within policing literature to make their decisions and assessments. As a result, it is suggested that further improvements are made regarding investigative decision-making models within operational policing where ‘anxiety’ and ‘uncertainty’ is heightened.

现有的警务政策提供了一种理性的决策方法,在儿童死亡调查中尽量不考虑人的判断。本研究采用混合方法来捕捉26名在职侦探督察和侦探警长的决策过程,同时对模拟儿童突然意外死亡(SUDC)调查的最初几个小时的沉浸式场景做出反应。参与者有四个决策点,在此期间,他们被要求从决策选项中做出选择,同时考虑影响该决定的个人和情境因素。对调查结果的专题分析发现,调查人员在整个决策过程中都表现出“焦虑”和“不确定性”。此外,没有证据表明调查人员利用警务文献中正式提倡的模型来做出决定和评估。因此,建议在“焦虑”和“不确定性”加剧的业务警务中进一步改进调查决策模型。
{"title":"Understanding the role of uncertainty and anxiety in police decision-making during the investigation of sudden unexpected deaths in children","authors":"Jonathan Holmes,&nbsp;Laura Boulton,&nbsp;Heather Panter","doi":"10.1002/jip.1583","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1583","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Existing policing policy offers a rational approach to decision-making with minimal reference to human judgement within child death investigations. This study adopted a mixed methodology to capture decisional processes of 26 serving detective inspectors and detective sergeants whilst responding to an immersive scenario which simulated the first hours of a <i>Sudden and Unexpected Death in Children</i> (SUDC) investigation. Participants were presented with four decision points, during which they were asked to choose from decision options while reflecting upon personal and situational factors influencing that decision. Thematic analysis of responses found that investigators disclosed ‘anxiety’ and ‘uncertainty’ throughout their decision-making during the scenario. In addition, there was no evidence of investigators utilising the models formally advocated within policing literature to make their decisions and assessments. As a result, it is suggested that further improvements are made regarding investigative decision-making models within operational policing where ‘anxiety’ and ‘uncertainty’ is heightened.</p>","PeriodicalId":46397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling","volume":"19 2","pages":"58-72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"137688482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Masking in murder: An exploratory study into the act of covering the victim’s face in UK homicide 谋杀中的面具:对英国谋杀案中掩盖受害者面部行为的探索性研究
IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Pub Date : 2021-12-11 DOI: 10.1002/jip.1582
Lee Rainbow, Caitlin Benson, Louise Almond, Alicia Tandy, Michelle McManus

Previous literature suggests that covering of a homicide victim's face by an offender indicates a pre-existing relationship. Operational definitions discriminate between three forms of victim covering (i) Masking (ii) Cloaking and (iii) Concealment. 126 UK homicide cases were examined to explore whether any evidence-based investigative inferences could be supported in cases of victim covering viewed through an instrumental/expressive framework. No statistically significant differences were found between face covering behaviour and the relationship between victim and offender, previous convictions, and offender age, although there was a high frequency of elderly female victims of masking. The findings are discussed in relation to offender-profiling.

先前的文献表明,罪犯遮住受害者的脸表明他们已经有了关系。操作定义区分了三种形式的受害者掩盖(i)掩蔽(ii)伪装和(iii)隐藏。我们审查了126起英国杀人案,以探索在通过工具/表达框架看待受害者掩盖的情况下,是否可以支持任何基于证据的调查推论。蒙面行为与受害者和罪犯之间的关系、前科和罪犯年龄之间没有统计学上的显著差异,尽管蒙面的老年女性受害者频率很高。研究结果与罪犯侧写有关。
{"title":"Masking in murder: An exploratory study into the act of covering the victim’s face in UK homicide","authors":"Lee Rainbow,&nbsp;Caitlin Benson,&nbsp;Louise Almond,&nbsp;Alicia Tandy,&nbsp;Michelle McManus","doi":"10.1002/jip.1582","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jip.1582","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previous literature suggests that covering of a homicide victim's face by an offender indicates a pre-existing relationship. Operational definitions discriminate between three forms of victim covering (i) Masking (ii) Cloaking and (iii) Concealment. 126 UK homicide cases were examined to explore whether any evidence-based investigative inferences could be supported in cases of victim covering viewed through an instrumental/expressive framework. No statistically significant differences were found between face covering behaviour and the relationship between victim and offender, previous convictions, and offender age, although there was a high frequency of elderly female victims of masking. The findings are discussed in relation to offender-profiling.</p>","PeriodicalId":46397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling","volume":"19 1","pages":"20-32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jip.1582","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47129570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The relative impact of different ‘resistant behavioural responses’ on interrogative suggestibility in children: The powerful contribution of ‘direct explanation’ replies to unanswerable questions 不同的“抗拒行为反应”对儿童疑问性暗示的相对影响:“直接解释”对无法回答的问题的有力贡献
IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Pub Date : 2021-11-15 DOI: 10.1002/jip.1581
Gisli Gudjonsson, Monia Vagni, Tiziana Maiorano, Valeria Giostra, Daniela Pajardi

The aim of this study was to investigate the different types of resistant behavioural responses to unanswerable questions, their respective individual contribution to the overall variance in resistance efficacy, and their differential protective effect on repeated questioning, interrogative pressure, and delayed suggestibility. The participants were 360 children aged between 7 and 17 years, 180 of whom were suspected victims of sexual abuse and 180 matched peers for age, sex and IQ. All children completed the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale 2. Delayed suggestibility was measured after a 1-week delay. The findings show that ‘don't know’, ‘direct explanation’, and ‘no’ answers are unrelated response styles that have individual effects on resistance to misleading questions. ‘Direct explanation’ answers are most stable and robust and increase incrementally with age in children, whilst ‘no’ answers decline. The findings suggest that ‘Don't know’, ‘direct explanation’, and ‘no’ answers are driven by different cognitive and social processes.

本研究的目的是探讨不同类型的抗拒行为对无法回答的问题的反应,他们各自的个体贡献在抗拒效能的总体差异,以及他们对重复提问、询问压力和延迟暗示的不同保护作用。参与者是360名年龄在7岁到17岁之间的儿童,其中180名疑似性虐待受害者,180名年龄、性别和智商相近的同龄人。所有儿童均完成Gudjonsson易受暗示量表2。延迟性暗示在延迟1周后测量。研究结果表明,“不知道”、“直接解释”和“不”是不相关的回答方式,它们对人们对误导性问题的抵抗力有不同的影响。“直接解释”的答案是最稳定和有力的,并且随着儿童年龄的增长而逐渐增加,而“不”的答案则会下降。研究结果表明,“不知道”、“直接解释”和“不”的回答是由不同的认知和社会过程驱动的。
{"title":"The relative impact of different ‘resistant behavioural responses’ on interrogative suggestibility in children: The powerful contribution of ‘direct explanation’ replies to unanswerable questions","authors":"Gisli Gudjonsson,&nbsp;Monia Vagni,&nbsp;Tiziana Maiorano,&nbsp;Valeria Giostra,&nbsp;Daniela Pajardi","doi":"10.1002/jip.1581","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jip.1581","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this study was to investigate the different types of resistant behavioural responses to unanswerable questions, their respective individual contribution to the overall variance in resistance efficacy, and their differential protective effect on repeated questioning, interrogative pressure, and delayed suggestibility. The participants were 360 children aged between 7 and 17 years, 180 of whom were suspected victims of sexual abuse and 180 matched peers for age, sex and IQ. All children completed the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale 2. Delayed suggestibility was measured after a 1-week delay. The findings show that ‘don't know’, ‘direct explanation’, and ‘no’ answers are unrelated response styles that have individual effects on resistance to misleading questions. ‘Direct explanation’ answers are most stable and robust and increase incrementally with age in children, whilst ‘no’ answers decline. The findings suggest that ‘Don't know’, ‘direct explanation’, and ‘no’ answers are driven by different cognitive and social processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling","volume":"19 1","pages":"3-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jip.1581","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46539639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
A systematic review of the United Kingdom's contact child sexual exploitation perpetrator literature: Pointing a way forward for future research and practice 对英国接触儿童性剥削犯罪者文献的系统回顾:为未来的研究和实践指明方向
IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Pub Date : 2021-10-23 DOI: 10.1002/jip.1580
Vicky Mooney

Until recently, empirical evidence exploring Child Sexual Exploitation (CSE) has been scarce, particularly in relation to contact exploitation, where the convicted perpetrator seeks direct physical (offline) contact as opposed to solely targeting the victim online. This article presents a systematic review of the UK's contact CSE perpetrator literature, searching from 2009 to the present day to ensure that studies encompass the categorisations detailed within the CSE statutory definitions. Twenty-three research articles were appraised using a Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). A narrative synthesis approach was used to synthesise the findings from qualitative and mixed methods studies identifying four significant analytical themes including (a) barriers to examining a complex phenomenon, (b) recognising the contact CSE perpetrator, (c) understanding the contact CSE perpetrator and (d) responding to the contact CSE perpetrator. This review synthesises evidence in a singular study, ideal for policy-makers and stakeholders to provide a more comprehensive safeguarding response, guide future research directions, and provide suggestions for law enforcement disruption strategies within the United Kingdom. Recommendations for policy, practice, procedure and training include improving the recording of data, re-categorising CSE as CSA, targeting harmful sexual behaviour and group offending, and designing evidenced based perpetrator treatment programmes. Future research centring on the perpetrator's adverse experiences and the strategies used to instigate sexual contact could advance understanding of how these crimes could be prevented.

直到最近,探索儿童性剥削(CSE)的经验证据还很少,特别是与接触剥削有关的证据,在接触剥削中,被定罪的犯罪者寻求直接的身体(离线)接触,而不是仅仅针对在线受害者。本文对英国的接触性CSE犯罪者文献进行了系统回顾,从2009年至今进行了搜索,以确保研究涵盖了CSE法定定义中详细的分类。采用混合方法评价工具(MMAT)对23篇研究文章进行评价。采用叙事综合方法综合定性和混合方法研究的结果,确定了四个重要的分析主题,包括(A)检查复杂现象的障碍,(b)识别接触性CSE犯罪者,(c)理解接触性CSE犯罪者和(d)回应接触性CSE犯罪者。本综述综合了单一研究中的证据,非常适合政策制定者和利益相关者提供更全面的保障响应,指导未来的研究方向,并为联合王国的执法干扰策略提供建议。关于政策、实践、程序和培训的建议包括改进数据记录,将性侵重新归类为性侵,针对有害的性行为和群体犯罪,以及设计基于证据的犯罪者治疗方案。未来的研究集中在犯罪者的不良经历和用于煽动性接触的策略上,可以促进对如何预防这些犯罪的理解。
{"title":"A systematic review of the United Kingdom's contact child sexual exploitation perpetrator literature: Pointing a way forward for future research and practice","authors":"Vicky Mooney","doi":"10.1002/jip.1580","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jip.1580","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Until recently, empirical evidence exploring Child Sexual Exploitation (CSE) has been scarce, particularly in relation to contact exploitation, where the convicted perpetrator seeks direct physical (offline) contact as opposed to solely targeting the victim online. This article presents a systematic review of the UK's <i>contact</i> CSE perpetrator literature, searching from 2009 to the present day to ensure that studies encompass the categorisations detailed within the CSE statutory definitions. Twenty-three research articles were appraised using a Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). A narrative synthesis approach was used to synthesise the findings from qualitative and mixed methods studies identifying four significant analytical themes including (a) <i>barriers to examining a complex phenomenon</i>, (b) <i>recognising the contact CSE perpetrator</i>, (c) <i>understanding the contact CSE perpetrator and (d) responding to the contact CSE perpetrator</i>. This review synthesises evidence in a singular study, ideal for policy-makers and stakeholders to provide a more comprehensive safeguarding response, guide future research directions, and provide suggestions for law enforcement disruption strategies within the United Kingdom. Recommendations for policy, practice, procedure and training include improving the recording of data, re-categorising CSE as CSA, targeting harmful sexual behaviour and group offending, and designing evidenced based perpetrator treatment programmes. Future research centring on the perpetrator's adverse experiences and the strategies used to instigate sexual contact could advance understanding of how these crimes could be prevented.</p>","PeriodicalId":46397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling","volume":"19 2","pages":"40-57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49337883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Investigative interviewing of high‐status fraud suspects 对高级诈骗嫌疑人的调查访谈
IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Pub Date : 2021-09-15 DOI: 10.1002/jip.1579
Manon R. Hoekstra, W. Verhoeven
{"title":"Investigative interviewing of high‐status fraud suspects","authors":"Manon R. Hoekstra, W. Verhoeven","doi":"10.1002/jip.1579","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1579","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jip.1579","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46690220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
A description and examination of cyber‐bullying victimisation in the UK 英国网络欺凌受害情况的描述和调查
IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Pub Date : 2021-09-04 DOI: 10.1002/jip.1578
Calli Tzani, M. Ioannou, J. Synnott, D. McDonnell, N. Pylarinou
{"title":"A description and examination of cyber‐bullying victimisation in the UK","authors":"Calli Tzani, M. Ioannou, J. Synnott, D. McDonnell, N. Pylarinou","doi":"10.1002/jip.1578","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1578","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jip.1578","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44197586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Fallacies in the estimation of the validity of the Comparison Question Polygraph Test: A reply to Ginton (2020) 比较题多角图测试有效性估计的谬误:对Ginton(2020)的回复
IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Pub Date : 2021-06-10 DOI: 10.1002/JIP.1576
G. Ben-Shakhar, W. Iacono
{"title":"Fallacies in the estimation of the validity of the Comparison Question Polygraph Test: A reply to Ginton (2020)","authors":"G. Ben-Shakhar, W. Iacono","doi":"10.1002/JIP.1576","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/JIP.1576","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/JIP.1576","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47676692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Contextualising mass school shootings in the United States 美国大规模校园枪击事件的背景
IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Pub Date : 2021-06-04 DOI: 10.1002/JIP.1577
G. R. Paez, Joel A. Capellan, Madison Johnson
{"title":"Contextualising mass school shootings in the United States","authors":"G. R. Paez, Joel A. Capellan, Madison Johnson","doi":"10.1002/JIP.1577","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/JIP.1577","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/JIP.1577","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48018721","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
期刊
Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling
全部 Geobiology Appl. Clay Sci. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta J. Hydrol. Org. Geochem. Carbon Balance Manage. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. Int. J. Biometeorol. IZV-PHYS SOLID EART+ J. Atmos. Chem. Acta Oceanolog. Sin. Acta Geophys. ACTA GEOL POL ACTA PETROL SIN ACTA GEOL SIN-ENGL AAPG Bull. Acta Geochimica Adv. Atmos. Sci. Adv. Meteorol. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Am. J. Sci. Am. Mineral. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. Appl. Geochem. Aquat. Geochem. Ann. Glaciol. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. ARCHAEOMETRY ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci. ATMOSPHERE-BASEL Atmos. Res. Aust. J. Earth Sci. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Atmos. Meas. Tech. Basin Res. Big Earth Data BIOGEOSCIENCES Geostand. Geoanal. Res. GEOLOGY Geosci. J. Geochem. J. Geochem. Trans. Geosci. Front. Geol. Ore Deposits Global Biogeochem. Cycles Gondwana Res. Geochem. Int. Geol. J. Geophys. Prospect. Geosci. Model Dev. GEOL BELG GROUNDWATER Hydrogeol. J. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Hydrol. Processes Int. J. Climatol. Int. J. Earth Sci. Int. Geol. Rev. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. Int. J. Geomech. Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci. Isl. Arc J. Afr. Earth. Sci. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. J APPL METEOROL CLIM J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. J. Clim. J. Earth Sci. J. Earth Syst. Sci. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. J. Geog. Sci. Mineral. Mag. Miner. Deposita Mon. Weather Rev. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Nat. Clim. Change Nat. Geosci. Ocean Dyn. Ocean and Coastal Research npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. Ocean Modell. Ocean Sci. Ore Geol. Rev. OCEAN SCI J Paleontol. J. PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL PERIOD MINERAL PETROLOGY+ Phys. Chem. Miner. Polar Sci. Prog. Oceanogr. Quat. Sci. Rev. Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. RADIOCARBON Pure Appl. Geophys. Resour. Geol. Rev. Geophys. Sediment. Geol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1