首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Economic Methodology最新文献

英文 中文
Explanation, prediction, and conceptual exploration 解释、预测和概念探索
IF 1.2 3区 经济学 Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI: 10.1080/1350178x.2024.2326909
Daniel Hausman
This essay aims to provide a rigorous foundation for Gilboa's, Postlewaite's, Samuelson's and Schmeidler's (GPSS's) account of the constitution of models and the role of models in explanation and p...
本文旨在为吉尔博亚、波斯特勒韦特、萨缪尔森和施迈德勒(GPSS)关于模型的构成以及模型在解释和研究中的作用的论述提供一个严谨的基础。
{"title":"Explanation, prediction, and conceptual exploration","authors":"Daniel Hausman","doi":"10.1080/1350178x.2024.2326909","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178x.2024.2326909","url":null,"abstract":"This essay aims to provide a rigorous foundation for Gilboa's, Postlewaite's, Samuelson's and Schmeidler's (GPSS's) account of the constitution of models and the role of models in explanation and p...","PeriodicalId":46507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Methodology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140168755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Equilibrium modeling in economics: a design-based defense 经济学中的均衡建模:基于设计的辩护
IF 1.2 3区 经济学 Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI: 10.1080/1350178x.2024.2310214
Armin W. Schulz
Several authors have recently argued that the excessive focus on equilibrium models in mainstream economic analysis prevents economists from providing accurate representations of the complex and dy...
最近有几位作者认为,主流经济分析过度关注均衡模型,妨碍了经济学家准确地表述复杂多变的经济现象。
{"title":"Equilibrium modeling in economics: a design-based defense","authors":"Armin W. Schulz","doi":"10.1080/1350178x.2024.2310214","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178x.2024.2310214","url":null,"abstract":"Several authors have recently argued that the excessive focus on equilibrium models in mainstream economic analysis prevents economists from providing accurate representations of the complex and dy...","PeriodicalId":46507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Methodology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139903468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
To change or not to change. The evolution of forecasting models at the Bank of England 改还是不改?英格兰银行预测模型的演变
IF 1.2 3区 经济学 Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI: 10.1080/1350178x.2024.2303113
Aurélien Goutsmedt, Francesco Sergi, Béatrice Cherrier, Juan Acosta, Clément Fontan, François Claveau
Why do policymakers and economists within a policymaking institution choose to throw away a model and to develop an alternative one? Why do they choose to stick to an existing model? This article c...
为什么决策机构中的决策者和经济学家会选择放弃一种模式而开发另一种模式?他们为什么选择坚持现有模式?本文探讨了这些问题。
{"title":"To change or not to change. The evolution of forecasting models at the Bank of England","authors":"Aurélien Goutsmedt, Francesco Sergi, Béatrice Cherrier, Juan Acosta, Clément Fontan, François Claveau","doi":"10.1080/1350178x.2024.2303113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178x.2024.2303113","url":null,"abstract":"Why do policymakers and economists within a policymaking institution choose to throw away a model and to develop an alternative one? Why do they choose to stick to an existing model? This article c...","PeriodicalId":46507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Methodology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139764344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Good and bad justifications of analytical modelling 分析建模的好与坏的理由
3区 经济学 Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI: 10.1080/1350178x.2023.2275584
Robert Sugden
Gilboa, Postlewaite, Samuelson and Schmeidler (2022, Economic theories and their dueling interpretations. Journal of Economic Methodology, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2022.2142270; henceforth GPSS) give a ‘sociological’ account of various ways in which economists claim to find value in ‘analytical’ models – i.e. models that investigate formal relationships between concepts without deriving substantive empirical or normative conclusions. In this paper, I argue that some of the claims that GPSS report economists as making are defensible, but that others are used in support of modelling strategies that have little or no scientific value.
Gilboa, Postlewaite, Samuelson和Schmeidler(2022),经济学理论及其决斗解释。《经济方法论》,第1期-第20期。https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2022.2142270;因此,GPSS)给出了经济学家声称在“分析”模型中发现价值的各种方式的“社会学”解释-即调查概念之间的形式关系而不得出实质性经验或规范结论的模型。在本文中,我认为GPSS报告经济学家提出的一些主张是站住脚的,但其他一些主张被用来支持几乎没有科学价值的建模策略。
{"title":"Good and bad justifications of analytical modelling","authors":"Robert Sugden","doi":"10.1080/1350178x.2023.2275584","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178x.2023.2275584","url":null,"abstract":"Gilboa, Postlewaite, Samuelson and Schmeidler (2022, Economic theories and their dueling interpretations. Journal of Economic Methodology, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2022.2142270; henceforth GPSS) give a ‘sociological’ account of various ways in which economists claim to find value in ‘analytical’ models – i.e. models that investigate formal relationships between concepts without deriving substantive empirical or normative conclusions. In this paper, I argue that some of the claims that GPSS report economists as making are defensible, but that others are used in support of modelling strategies that have little or no scientific value.","PeriodicalId":46507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Methodology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136346981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Social Preferences: An Introduction to Behavioural Economics and Experimental Research Social Preferences: An Introduction to Behavioural Economics and Experimental Research by M. Drouvelis, Newcastle upon Tyne, the UK, Agenda Publishing, 2021, 210 p., £22.99, ISBN 9781788214179 (paperback) 《社会偏好:行为经济学与实验研究导论》,作者:M. Drouvelis,泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔,英国,议程出版社,2021年,210页,22.99英镑,ISBN 9781788214179(平装本)
3区 经济学 Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1080/1350178x.2023.2272413
Egor Bronnikov
{"title":"Social Preferences: An Introduction to Behavioural Economics and Experimental Research <b>Social Preferences: An Introduction to Behavioural Economics and Experimental Research</b> by M. Drouvelis, Newcastle upon Tyne, the UK, Agenda Publishing, 2021, 210 p., £22.99, ISBN 9781788214179 (paperback)","authors":"Egor Bronnikov","doi":"10.1080/1350178x.2023.2272413","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178x.2023.2272413","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Methodology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135271783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Introduction to the INEM 2021 conference special issue INEM 2021会议特刊简介
3区 经济学 Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI: 10.1080/1350178x.2023.2268629
Malte Dold, C. Tyler DesRoches, Merve Burnazoglu
{"title":"Introduction to the INEM 2021 conference special issue","authors":"Malte Dold, C. Tyler DesRoches, Merve Burnazoglu","doi":"10.1080/1350178x.2023.2268629","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178x.2023.2268629","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Methodology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134909005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ontological wars in economics: the return of supervenience 经济学中的本体论之战:监督的回归
3区 经济学 Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2023-10-24 DOI: 10.1080/1350178x.2023.2271932
Alexandre Müller Fonseca
ABSTRACTIn this article, I contest Brian Epstein’s argument (2014) against the applicability of global supervenience to relate micro and macroeconomic properties. Epstein rejects supervenience via a causal-chain relation inside the macroeconomic set in his criticism. Accordingly, the rise of the macro set is fixed by a weather event without any mediation from the realm of microeconomics. As it stands, this idea would demonstrate the autonomy of macroeconomics from microeconomics. However, as I intend to argue, in Epstein’s weather-cases scenarios, the corresponding macroeconomic sets are fixed by their micro bases that codify weather events and thereby fix the macro. This is so because the microeconomic base must include institutional facts; they are as much necessary as the facts about people’s conditions. In so doing, we re-establish bottom–top determination from the micro to the macro, rescuing the applicability of global supervenience.KEYWORDS: Supervenience; global supervenience; Kevin Hoover; Brian Epstein; ontology of economics AcknowledgementsI would like to thank Julie Zahle, Matthew Tugby, Nancy Cartwright, and Pedro Garcia Duarte for helpful feedbacks on previous versions of the manuscript. I also must thank both referees for their valuable comments.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 See McLaughlin and Bennett (Citation2021).2 Usually, the supervenience’ relata are facts or properties. The concept is not normally employed to relate representational items such as theories or their fragments. Butterfield (Citation2011) has applied the concept to relate different scales of physical theories. In this article, I take as the primary relata of supervenience sets as facts/properties. Along the exposition, these two possible relata are employed interchangeably.3 Peter Kivy (Citation1987) defends a Platonist view of musical works: they are abstract objects (universals, types, or kinds) identical to their sound structures. Their performances are particulars, tokens, or instances. The Platonist view of music is the dominant interpretation about the ontology of music, but there are other interpretations. For an overview, see Kania (Citation2017).4 In The Jazz of Physics, the physicist and jazz musician Stephon Alexander (Citation2016) argues that several symmetries that plays a significant role in quantum mechanics are musically represented in Coltrane’s songs.5 See, Walton (Citation1970).6 Hoover himself did not offer details about emergence. On my view, Hoover bears in mind a weak notion of emergence. Wilson (Citation2021) states two criteria for weak emergence. First, a token higher-level property H is weakly metaphysically emergent from token lower-level property L on a given occasion when (i) H and L are synchronically related and (ii) H has a non-empty proper subset of the token powers had by L. Condition (i) specifies synchronic dependence while (ii) captures a weak sense where an emerg
在本文中,我对Brian Epstein(2014)的观点提出质疑,他反对将全球监管与微观和宏观经济属性联系起来。在他的批评中,爱泼斯坦通过宏观经济内部的因果链关系来拒绝监督。因此,宏观集合的上升是由天气事件决定的,没有任何来自微观经济学领域的中介。照目前的情况来看,这一观点将证明宏观经济学独立于微观经济学的自主性。然而,正如我打算论证的那样,在爱泼斯坦的天气案例情景中,相应的宏观经济集合是由它们的微观基础固定的,这些微观基础编纂了天气事件,从而固定了宏观经济。这是因为微观经济基础必须包括制度事实;它们和关于人们状况的事实一样重要。这样,我们从微观到宏观重新建立了自下而上的决定,挽救了全球监管的适用性。关键词:偶然性;全球偶然性;凯文·胡佛;Brian Epstein;我要感谢Julie Zahle、Matthew Tugby、Nancy Cartwright和Pedro Garcia Duarte对以前版本的手稿提供的有益反馈。我还要感谢两位裁判的宝贵意见。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1参见McLaughlin and Bennett (Citation2021)通常,监督关系是事实或属性。概念通常不用于联系表征项目,如理论或其片段。巴特菲尔德(Citation2011)将这一概念应用于物理理论的不同尺度。在本文中,我把监督集作为事实/属性的主要关系。在整个论述过程中,这两种可能的关系是交替使用的Peter Kivy (Citation1987)为柏拉图主义的音乐作品观点辩护:它们是与它们的声音结构相同的抽象对象(共相、类型或种类)。他们的表演是细节、象征或实例。柏拉图主义的音乐观是对音乐本体论的主要解释,但也有其他的解释。有关概述,请参见Kania (Citation2017)在The Jazz of Physics中,物理学家兼爵士音乐家Stephon Alexander (Citation2016)认为,在量子力学中发挥重要作用的几种对称性在Coltrane的歌曲中得到了音乐上的表现参见,沃尔顿(引文1970)胡佛本人没有提供有关紧急情况的细节。在我看来,胡佛牢记的是一个很弱的涌现概念。Wilson (Citation2021)提出了弱涌现的两个标准。首先,当(i) H和L是同步相关的,并且(ii) H具有L所具有的令牌权力的非空固有子集时,在给定场合下,令牌高级属性H从令牌低级属性L中弱形而上学地涌现出来,条件(i)指定了同步依赖性,而(ii)捕获了一个弱意义,其中一个涌现实体E是因果自治的,并且在本体论上与其基础实体不同。根据威尔逊的说法,这种观点是对非简化物理主义的恰当描述,这也说明了为什么胡佛把他的经济学方法称为非简化策略有时,制度可能具有更广泛的作用,而不仅仅是限制或使行为成为可能。约束作用并不是制度可能具有的唯一特征。关于机构潜在的隐藏的普遍作用,见霍奇森(Citation2003)我要感谢其中一位裁判,他突出了爱泼斯坦的论点与20世纪70年代的历史新古典主义微观模型之间的一致性。alexandre mller Fonseca感谢巴西研究委员会(CAPES,合同编号88881.128923/2016-01)对作者的支持alexandre mller Fonseca最近在英国杜伦大学获得哲学博士学位。他是Insper(巴西圣保罗)的经济学博士后研究员。他目前的研究主要集中在经济哲学和社会科学哲学等更广泛的领域。更具体地说,他对经济学和社会科学中与非因果和多种类型的层次间解释相关的各种主题以及包括经济学在内的科学模型的解释能力感兴趣。
{"title":"Ontological wars in economics: the return of supervenience","authors":"Alexandre Müller Fonseca","doi":"10.1080/1350178x.2023.2271932","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178x.2023.2271932","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIn this article, I contest Brian Epstein’s argument (2014) against the applicability of global supervenience to relate micro and macroeconomic properties. Epstein rejects supervenience via a causal-chain relation inside the macroeconomic set in his criticism. Accordingly, the rise of the macro set is fixed by a weather event without any mediation from the realm of microeconomics. As it stands, this idea would demonstrate the autonomy of macroeconomics from microeconomics. However, as I intend to argue, in Epstein’s weather-cases scenarios, the corresponding macroeconomic sets are fixed by their micro bases that codify weather events and thereby fix the macro. This is so because the microeconomic base must include institutional facts; they are as much necessary as the facts about people’s conditions. In so doing, we re-establish bottom–top determination from the micro to the macro, rescuing the applicability of global supervenience.KEYWORDS: Supervenience; global supervenience; Kevin Hoover; Brian Epstein; ontology of economics AcknowledgementsI would like to thank Julie Zahle, Matthew Tugby, Nancy Cartwright, and Pedro Garcia Duarte for helpful feedbacks on previous versions of the manuscript. I also must thank both referees for their valuable comments.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 See McLaughlin and Bennett (Citation2021).2 Usually, the supervenience’ relata are facts or properties. The concept is not normally employed to relate representational items such as theories or their fragments. Butterfield (Citation2011) has applied the concept to relate different scales of physical theories. In this article, I take as the primary relata of supervenience sets as facts/properties. Along the exposition, these two possible relata are employed interchangeably.3 Peter Kivy (Citation1987) defends a Platonist view of musical works: they are abstract objects (universals, types, or kinds) identical to their sound structures. Their performances are particulars, tokens, or instances. The Platonist view of music is the dominant interpretation about the ontology of music, but there are other interpretations. For an overview, see Kania (Citation2017).4 In The Jazz of Physics, the physicist and jazz musician Stephon Alexander (Citation2016) argues that several symmetries that plays a significant role in quantum mechanics are musically represented in Coltrane’s songs.5 See, Walton (Citation1970).6 Hoover himself did not offer details about emergence. On my view, Hoover bears in mind a weak notion of emergence. Wilson (Citation2021) states two criteria for weak emergence. First, a token higher-level property H is weakly metaphysically emergent from token lower-level property L on a given occasion when (i) H and L are synchronically related and (ii) H has a non-empty proper subset of the token powers had by L. Condition (i) specifies synchronic dependence while (ii) captures a weak sense where an emerg","PeriodicalId":46507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Methodology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135267850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The genetic lottery why DNA matters for social equality The genetic lottery why DNA matters for social equality , by Kathryn Paige Harden, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2021, 312 pp., $29.95/£25.00, ISBN: 9780691226705 遗传彩票为什么DNA对社会平等至关重要,凯瑟琳·佩奇·哈登著,普林斯顿,普林斯顿大学出版社,2021年,312页,29.95美元/ 25.00英镑,ISBN: 9780691226705
3区 经济学 Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2023-10-09 DOI: 10.1080/1350178x.2023.2266666
Jonathan M. Kaplan
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 In human behavior genetics, heritability is usually calculated by comparing the similarity of monozygotic (identical) twins to that of dizygotic (“fraternal”) same-sex twins, under the assumption that such sets of twins will have experienced (roughly) the same developmental environments, and so any excess similarity in identical twins must be associated with their excess genetic similarity. For a critique of this methodology and the assumptions underlying it, see e.g. Joseph, Citation2014. While I am skeptical of the accuracy of heritability estimates in human behavioral traits (see Matthews & Turkheimer, Citation2022 for a review of some of the ways in which heritability estimates can be inaccurate), my own view is that the concept’s fundamental limitations usually make arguments about its accuracy moot (see Kaplan, Citation2006, for discussion).2 I want to note that I am not endorsing such a policy – while I would like to be in a society in which everyone remotely capable of doing so and with any desire to do so be able to attend and graduate from college without incurring unreasonable costs, I don’t think it is imperative that everyone capable of doing so in fact want to do so, and would hope that any reasonably just society would create / hold space (meaningful, well-paid work) for people for whom pursuing a college education was not attractive.3 Though again, Harden overstates her case. The evidence suggests that children who are more genetically similar to children who engage in early sexual behavior (within a particular social context, etc.) are also more likely to be similar in terms of adverse outcomes, but the move from there to “genes that accelerate reproductive development” is a stretch, at best.4 I resist citing this “paper” as doing so risks legitimizing it and the “journal” in which it appears – readers interested in reading this “paper” will I trust have no trouble locating it.
注1在人类行为遗传学中,通常通过比较同卵(同卵)双胞胎与异卵(“异卵”)同性双胞胎的相似性来计算遗传力,假设这对双胞胎将经历(大致)相同的发育环境,因此同卵双胞胎的任何过度相似性必然与他们的过度遗传相似性有关。对于这种方法及其基础假设的批评,请参见例如Joseph, Citation2014。虽然我对人类行为特征的遗传性估计的准确性持怀疑态度(参见马修斯和图克海默,Citation2022对遗传性估计可能不准确的一些方式的回顾),但我自己的观点是,该概念的基本局限性通常使关于其准确性的争论变得毫无意义(参见卡普兰,Citation2006,讨论)我想指出,我不支持这种政策,而我想要远程在社会中,每个人都能这样做,任何渴望能够参加,从大学毕业,而不会不合理的成本,我不认为这是必要的,每个人都能这样做实际上想要这么做,并希望任何合理公正的社会将创建/保存空间(有意义,(对那些没有大学学历的人来说,高薪的工作)不过,哈登再次夸大了她的观点。有证据表明,在基因上与早期有性行为的儿童(在特定的社会环境中等)更相似的儿童,在不良后果方面也更可能相似,但从那里转移到“加速生殖发育的基因”充其量是一种延伸我拒绝引用这篇“论文”,因为这样做有可能使它和它出现的“期刊”合法化——我相信有兴趣阅读这篇“论文”的读者会毫不费力地找到它。
{"title":"The genetic lottery why DNA matters for social equality <b>The genetic lottery why DNA matters for social equality</b> , by Kathryn Paige Harden, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2021, 312 pp., $29.95/£25.00, ISBN: 9780691226705","authors":"Jonathan M. Kaplan","doi":"10.1080/1350178x.2023.2266666","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178x.2023.2266666","url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 In human behavior genetics, heritability is usually calculated by comparing the similarity of monozygotic (identical) twins to that of dizygotic (“fraternal”) same-sex twins, under the assumption that such sets of twins will have experienced (roughly) the same developmental environments, and so any excess similarity in identical twins must be associated with their excess genetic similarity. For a critique of this methodology and the assumptions underlying it, see e.g. Joseph, Citation2014. While I am skeptical of the accuracy of heritability estimates in human behavioral traits (see Matthews & Turkheimer, Citation2022 for a review of some of the ways in which heritability estimates can be inaccurate), my own view is that the concept’s fundamental limitations usually make arguments about its accuracy moot (see Kaplan, Citation2006, for discussion).2 I want to note that I am not endorsing such a policy – while I would like to be in a society in which everyone remotely capable of doing so and with any desire to do so be able to attend and graduate from college without incurring unreasonable costs, I don’t think it is imperative that everyone capable of doing so in fact want to do so, and would hope that any reasonably just society would create / hold space (meaningful, well-paid work) for people for whom pursuing a college education was not attractive.3 Though again, Harden overstates her case. The evidence suggests that children who are more genetically similar to children who engage in early sexual behavior (within a particular social context, etc.) are also more likely to be similar in terms of adverse outcomes, but the move from there to “genes that accelerate reproductive development” is a stretch, at best.4 I resist citing this “paper” as doing so risks legitimizing it and the “journal” in which it appears – readers interested in reading this “paper” will I trust have no trouble locating it.","PeriodicalId":46507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Methodology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135141197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A contribution to scientific studies of norms in economics inspired by JN Keynes and popper 对经济学规范科学研究的贡献,受到凯恩斯和波普尔的启发
3区 经济学 Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2023-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/1350178x.2023.2267075
Sina Badiei
ABSTRACTThis paper defends JN Keynes’s argument that normative economics can be objective. It begins by exploring Keynes’s view on the positive/normative distinction in economics. After discussing its originality and advantages, the paper recognizes that the Keynesian distinction does not explain the exact nature of the relationship between positive and normative economics. Thus, it tries to improve Keynes’s position using Popper’s contributions to economics. It shows that for Popper, advances in normative social science are the main steppingstone to resolving disagreements over the choice of the norms underlying the reform of social situations. The final two parts of the paper draw on the contributions of Keynes and Popper to the study of norms to explain why normative economics can more easily approach objectivity by concentrating on highly delimited topics. The last part relies on Popper’s concept of avoidable unhappiness to offer one method of restraining the tasks of normative economics.KEYWORDS: Positive economicsnormative economicsnorms and valuesepistemology of economicsphilosophy of economicsbasic needs AcknowledgementI want to express my gratitude to John Davis, Wade Hands and Élodie Bertrand for their invaluable comments on previous versions of this paper, and the editors of INEM 2021 Special Issue, Malte Dold, Merve Bornazoglu and Tyler Desroches, for their help and consideration. Last but not least, I would like to acknowledge the immensely helpful comments and suggestions of two anonymous referees, which allowed me to improve the paper considerably. It goes without saying that I am responsible for any remaining shortcoming.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Hands (Citation2012) has argued in favor of distinguishing epistemic values that influence scientific work from non-epistemic norms that influence the actions of socio-economic agents in general (Citation2012, pp. 220–221). This article's focus is on non-epistemic, i.e., social and ethical norms, and it often follows Hands by distinguishing epistemic values from non-epistemic norms.2 Keynes's book is much more than a mere epistemological and methodological restatement of Marshall's economics, as proven by Marshall's not-very-enthusiastic comments on the book and Keynes's characterization of Marshall's views as ‘nearly always exaggerated on one side or the other’ (Deane, Citation2001, p. 138).3 For example, suppose we have a choice between two policies, A and B. Policy A allows the wealthiest person to gain the sum of x. After compensating the losers, he still gains the sum of y relative to the initial situation. Policy B allows the poorest person to gain the sum of x. After compensating the loser, who happens to be the richest person, she still gains the sum of y relative to the initial situation. Paretian welfare economics offers no guidance as to which of these policies should be adopted, leaving the decision to politician
摘要本文对凯恩斯关于规范经济学可以是客观的观点进行了论证。它首先探索凯恩斯对经济学中积极/规范区别的看法。在讨论了它的原创性和优势之后,本文认识到凯恩斯主义的区分并没有解释积极经济学和规范经济学之间关系的确切性质。因此,它试图利用波普尔对经济学的贡献来改善凯恩斯的地位。这表明,对于波普尔来说,规范社会科学的进步是解决社会状况改革背后的规范选择分歧的主要垫脚石。论文的最后两部分借鉴了凯恩斯和波普尔对规范研究的贡献,以解释为什么规范经济学可以更容易地通过专注于高度界定的主题来接近客观性。最后一部分依靠波普尔的“可避免的不快乐”概念来提供一种约束规范经济学任务的方法。关键词:实证经济学规范经济学规范与价值经济学认识论经济学哲学基本需求致谢我要感谢John Davis, Wade Hands和Élodie Bertrand对本文前几版的宝贵意见,以及INEM 2021特刊的编辑Malte Dold, Merve Bornazoglu和Tyler Desroches的帮助和考虑。最后但并非最不重要的是,我要感谢两位匿名审稿人提供的非常有帮助的意见和建议,他们使我的论文得到了很大的改进。不用说,剩下的缺点都是我的责任。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1 Hands (Citation2012)主张将影响科学工作的认知价值与一般影响社会经济主体行为的非认知规范区分开来(Citation2012, pp. 220-221)。本文的重点是非认识论的,即社会和伦理规范,它经常通过区分认识论价值和非认识论规范来遵循汉兹凯恩斯的书不仅仅是对马歇尔经济学的认识论和方法论的重述,马歇尔对这本书的不太热情的评论和凯恩斯对马歇尔观点的描述“几乎总是在这一方面或另一方面被夸大了”证明了这一点(迪恩,引文2001,第138页)例如,假设我们在a和b两种策略之间做出选择。策略a允许最富有的人获得x的总和。在补偿了输家之后,他仍然获得相对于初始情况的y的总和。政策B允许最穷的人获得x的总和。在补偿了失败者(恰好是最富有的人)之后,她仍然获得相对于初始情况的y的总和。父母福利经济学没有提供应该采用哪一种政策的指导,而是把决定权留给了政治家,尽管大多数决策的实际案例都涉及在这两种选择之间做出选择如果凯恩斯知道瓦尔拉斯对经济学的分类,特别是纯粹的政治经济和纯粹的道德科学之间的区别(dock<e:1>,引文1996,第37-59页),他可能会发现它们非常有用,接近他对积极经济学和规范经济学的区分在他的著作中,特别是在《科学与价值》(Citation1984)中,拉里·劳丹对其他模型进行了引人入胜的考察,这些模型解释了在科学中如何处理事实和方法层面上的分歧帕特南所说的价值观既包括认知价值,也包括非认知规范。此外,他还批评了哈贝马斯(Putnam & Walsh, Citation2012, pp. 121-128)等人对价值和规范进行不同种类的区分即使是刚才提到的讨论了波普尔规范性著作的著作,也很少关注波普尔对规范性问题的贡献与他在经济方法论和经济哲学方面的著作之间的关系。值得注意的是,波普尔经常使用经济学作为所有社会科学的模型(波普尔,Citation1974/2005, p. 135;Popper, Citation1976,第103页;8 . Popper, Citation1994,第181页)可以肯定的是,有些人可能会决定不顾他人的意愿强行实施他们想要的计划。然而,这种态度是极权主义的,因为它使一个有限群体的理想计划成为唯一重要的计划。因此,通过设法了解现有情况和他人的计划来避免这种态度是一种规范的选择众多学者(Hands, Citation2001;戈顿,Citation2006;Citation2008奥格尔曼说道;Agassi, Citation2009)已经研究了波普尔关于情景分析的著作。因此,本文仅讨论其与-à-vis实证经济学中其他理论方法的异同。 考虑到制度主义观点在波普尔对实证社会科学任务的描述中所起的作用,我们可以怀疑他是否同意哈耶克对经济学的描述(波普尔,引文1994,第181页;波普尔,引文2012,第403-404页)不是植根于他缺乏扎实的知识的边缘主义。值得一提的是,在研究积极经济学的新古典经济学家中,博弈论理论家比其他人更能体现制度主义观点,因为游戏规则在如何解释参与者的策略方面起着决定性作用对于波普尔来说,“只有在暴政下使用暴力才是正当的”(Citation1945/2013, p. 360),因为后者“使得不使用暴力的改革成为不可能”(Citation1945/2013, p. 360)。然而,他提醒我们,在这种情况下使用暴力“应该只有一个目的,即带来一种使无暴力改革成为可能的事态”(Citation1945/2013, p. 360)我非常感谢其中一位审稿人向我推荐这篇论文罗宾斯的定义和他的《经济学的本质和意义》中的其他几个论点反过来又受到路德维希·冯·米塞斯的《经济学的认识论问题》的影响,该书于1933年首次以德语出版,然后于1960年以英语出版。它的大部分章节都是在1928年到1931年之间作为文章发表的,由于他参加了米塞斯在维也纳的研讨会(Wasserman, Citation2019),罗宾斯在写他的论文之前对它们很熟悉,并在米塞斯的序言中承认“特别欠米塞斯的债”。然而,正如豪森(Citation2004)和汉兹(Citation2009)所强调的那样,米塞斯并不是唯一的主要影响者正因为如此,政治经济学的艺术应该用其他社会科学的投入来完成规范经济学的评价和处方。sina Badiei是洛桑大学瓦尔拉斯-帕累托中心的初级讲师(首席助理),也是巴黎lumiires大学国际哲学学院哲学与人文科学系的项目主任。在他的几个学士和硕士学位期间,他学习了电子工程、物理学、政治哲学、经济学以及科学史和哲学。他的博士学位是经济学的历史、哲学和认识论。题为“马克思,米塞斯,弗里德曼和波普尔的实证经济学和规范经济学”,它于2020年9月进行了辩护,并获得了2022年“Charles Gide pour l ' Étude de la pens<s:1> Économique协会”最佳论文奖,该奖项授予了在2020年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间捍卫的历史,认识论或经济学哲学的最佳论文。他的研究涉及经济学家在经济思想史上的规范性立场和分析的理论和哲学基础,特别是马克思主义和新李嘉图学派、奥地利学派、芝加哥学派和洛桑学派。他还研究如何在当代规范经济学(福利经济学、社会选择理论、能力方法)和当代经济正义理论中评估规范和价值。他出版了两本书,合编了两本集体书籍,并合编了《经济哲学评论》杂志的一期特刊。在他最近的出版物中,他为“劳特利奇INEM经济方法论进展”合编了《经济思想中的积极和规范》一书。
{"title":"A contribution to scientific studies of norms in economics inspired by JN Keynes and popper","authors":"Sina Badiei","doi":"10.1080/1350178x.2023.2267075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178x.2023.2267075","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis paper defends JN Keynes’s argument that normative economics can be objective. It begins by exploring Keynes’s view on the positive/normative distinction in economics. After discussing its originality and advantages, the paper recognizes that the Keynesian distinction does not explain the exact nature of the relationship between positive and normative economics. Thus, it tries to improve Keynes’s position using Popper’s contributions to economics. It shows that for Popper, advances in normative social science are the main steppingstone to resolving disagreements over the choice of the norms underlying the reform of social situations. The final two parts of the paper draw on the contributions of Keynes and Popper to the study of norms to explain why normative economics can more easily approach objectivity by concentrating on highly delimited topics. The last part relies on Popper’s concept of avoidable unhappiness to offer one method of restraining the tasks of normative economics.KEYWORDS: Positive economicsnormative economicsnorms and valuesepistemology of economicsphilosophy of economicsbasic needs AcknowledgementI want to express my gratitude to John Davis, Wade Hands and Élodie Bertrand for their invaluable comments on previous versions of this paper, and the editors of INEM 2021 Special Issue, Malte Dold, Merve Bornazoglu and Tyler Desroches, for their help and consideration. Last but not least, I would like to acknowledge the immensely helpful comments and suggestions of two anonymous referees, which allowed me to improve the paper considerably. It goes without saying that I am responsible for any remaining shortcoming.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Hands (Citation2012) has argued in favor of distinguishing epistemic values that influence scientific work from non-epistemic norms that influence the actions of socio-economic agents in general (Citation2012, pp. 220–221). This article's focus is on non-epistemic, i.e., social and ethical norms, and it often follows Hands by distinguishing epistemic values from non-epistemic norms.2 Keynes's book is much more than a mere epistemological and methodological restatement of Marshall's economics, as proven by Marshall's not-very-enthusiastic comments on the book and Keynes's characterization of Marshall's views as ‘nearly always exaggerated on one side or the other’ (Deane, Citation2001, p. 138).3 For example, suppose we have a choice between two policies, A and B. Policy A allows the wealthiest person to gain the sum of x. After compensating the losers, he still gains the sum of y relative to the initial situation. Policy B allows the poorest person to gain the sum of x. After compensating the loser, who happens to be the richest person, she still gains the sum of y relative to the initial situation. Paretian welfare economics offers no guidance as to which of these policies should be adopted, leaving the decision to politician","PeriodicalId":46507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Methodology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135900873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Models on trial: antitrust experts face Daubert challenges 审判模式:反垄断专家面临道伯特挑战
3区 经济学 Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2023-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/1350178x.2023.2267052
Edoardo Peruzzi
ABSTRACTEconomists are often called upon as expert witnesses by the parties involved in antitrust litigation. One challenge they may face in US federal courts is compliance with the Daubert standard of admissibility of expert testimony. The interplay between model applicability and the Daubert standard is analyzed, suggesting the importance of distinguishing between weak applicability claims, those that state that a model’s critical assumptions are shared by the target, and strong applicability claims, those that connect empirical models and quantitative market features. Recent antitrust cases in which expert testimonies based on economic models have been assessed following the Daubert standard are examined using this framework. Some normative implications are drawn concerning how to improve judges’ assessment of model-based arguments.KEYWORDS: Modelsantitrust lawDaubertmodel applicabilityexpert testimonyJEL CLASSIFICATION: B41K21L41L44 AcknowledgementsI wish to thank Nicola Giocoli, Emrah N. Aydinonat, Uskali Mäki, Steven G. Medema, Kevin D. Hoover, as well as two anonymous reviewers, for their helpful comments and suggestions. This work has been presented in seminars at the TINT Centre for Philosophy of Social Science, University of Helsinki, and Center for the History of Political Economy, Duke University. I thank the organizers and all participants for lively discussions and useful remarks.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 In addition to antitrust law, other legal areas where economic reasoning finds an eminent place are securities regulation, employment discrimination, and patent infringement (see Chassonnery-Zaïgouche, Citation2020; Maas & Svorenčík, Citation2017).2 The name originates from Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm. Inc., 509 US 579 (1993). See below, Section 2.3 Rule 702 – Testimony by Expert Witness. Retrieved from: https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_702.4 These findings should however be taken with a certain degree of caution for it is extremely hard to build a dataset containing all and only Daubert-related challenges (see Langenfeld & Alexander, Citation2011, Appendix).5 The Daubert Tracker website reports that economics ranks fourth among the most challenged discipline under Daubert/Rule 702 after medicine, engineering, and psychology. See www.dauberttracker.com (accessed May 15, 2023).6 Merger simulation has been introduced as a methodology for antitrust enforcement in the mid-1990s and it is now considered a standard tool by antitrust authorities. For a survey on merger simulation, see Budzinski and Ruhmer (Citation2010).7 Stanford economist Robert Hall saw his testimony rejected in Concord Boat Corp v. Brunswick (207 F.3d 1039, 8th Cir., 2000) because the Cournot model proposed to describe the relevant market did not fit economic realities (see Werden et al., Citation2004, p. 89). Three years later, a federal judge excluded the plaintiff’s expert following a Daube
在反垄断诉讼中,经济学家经常被要求作为专家证人。他们在美国联邦法院可能面临的一个挑战是遵守专家证词可采性的道伯特标准。分析了模型适用性和道伯特标准之间的相互作用,表明区分弱适用性声明和强适用性声明的重要性,弱适用性声明是指模型的关键假设被目标共享,强适用性声明是指将经验模型和定量市场特征联系起来。在最近的反垄断案件中,根据道伯特标准评估了基于经济模型的专家证词,并使用该框架进行了审查。关于如何提高法官对基于模型的论点的评估,提出了一些规范含义。关键词:模型;反垄断法;daubert模型适用性;专家证词;jel分类:B41K21L41L44致谢我要感谢Nicola Giocoli, Emrah N. Aydinonat, Uskali Mäki, Steven G. Medema, Kevin D. Hoover以及两位匿名审稿人的有用意见和建议。这项工作已在赫尔辛基大学TINT社会科学哲学中心和杜克大学政治经济史中心的研讨会上发表。我感谢组织者和所有与会者的热烈讨论和有益的发言。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1除反垄断法外,经济推理在证券监管、就业歧视和专利侵权等法律领域也占有重要地位(见Chassonnery-Zaïgouche, Citation2020;Maas & Svorenčík, Citation2017)这个名字源于道伯特诉梅雷尔陶氏制药公司。公司,509 US 579(1993)。见下文第2.3条规则702 -专家证人证词。然而,这些发现应该在一定程度上谨慎对待,因为构建一个包含所有或仅包含道伯特相关挑战的数据集是非常困难的(参见Langenfeld & Alexander, Citation2011,附录)据道伯特追踪网站报道,在道伯特/ 702规则下,经济学在最具挑战性的学科中排名第四,仅次于医学、工程学和心理学。参见www.dauberttracker.com(访问日期为2023年5月15日)在20世纪90年代中期,合并模拟作为反垄断执法的一种方法被引入,现在被反垄断当局视为一种标准工具。关于并购模拟的调查,见Budzinski和Ruhmer (Citation2010)斯坦福大学经济学家罗伯特·霍尔在康科德船公司诉布伦瑞克案(2000年第8期,207 F.3d 1039)中发现他的证词被驳回,因为用来描述相关市场的古诺模型不符合经济现实(见Werden et al., Citation2004,第89页)。三年后,一名联邦法官排除了原告的专家。此前,道伯特以类似理由在heavy Bros. Lightning pro案中提出质疑。公司诉Lightning Prot案287楼。补充2d 1038(亚利桑那州2003年)。关于经济学中假设的现实主义主题的经典参考是弗里德曼(Citation1953)和随后的广泛辩论(见Mäki, Citation2009)经济学家通常将构建经验模型的过程称为结构建模方法(如Reiss & Wolak, Citation2007)在产业经济学领域,代表市场竞争的抽象博弈论模型与代表市场竞争的实证模型之间的区别是相对清晰的,后者是通过使用现实世界的数据将这些模型参数化而产生的。然而,当我们在更广阔的背景下考虑经济学时,在理论模型和实证模型之间划出一条精确的界限就成了一项具有挑战性的任务,这在经济学哲学中仍然是一个悬而未决的问题下文第5节将讨论一个由反垄断纠纷中的经济专家证人设计的实证模型的具体例子这三种证据并不相互排斥。关于专家证人同时使用间接证据和敏感性分析的具体例子,见下文第5节重要的是要注意,理论模型的弱适用性并不能保证由它推导出的经验模型的强适用性。因此,得克萨斯州水果市场也认同伯特兰模型的关键假设,但这并不意味着经验模型的预测将是准确的(例如,如果需求弹性估计不佳)。因此,一旦联邦法官对弱适用性主张感到满意,他们就开始审查强适用性主张(见下文第5和6节)卡斯特罗诉赛诺菲巴斯德公司134 F。补编3d 820 (D.N.J. 2015)。 我通过法律数据库LexisNexis.15查阅了法院的意见、法律摘要、动议和其他未发表的材料卡斯特罗,证物51B。关于该模型的教科书处理,请参见梯若尔(Citation1988)准确地说,他在联邦供应计划(FSS)中确定了这部分市场,即与以规定价格向政府提供商业产品和服务的公司签订长期合同。正如Elhauge(表51B)所解释的那样,他使用了FSS购买者的数据,因为“FSS客户不受捆绑,因此他们的决定不会被捆绑扭曲”(第190页)卡斯特罗,回复简报。地区法官科琳·麦克马洪(Colleen McMahon)最近对Daubert动议的评论提供了一个例子。“这是一个典型的例子,”她写道,“法院称之为,“专家的证词损害了我们的案件,所以让我们试着取消专家”使用道伯特的资格。道伯特调查的目的是剔除不可靠的方法——“垃圾科学”——而不是取代对使用既定方法的分析的有效性进行交叉询问。在其他反垄断案件中,经济议价模式被认为是可靠的。[…]被告可以在审判中自由探讨Vogt博士对该模型的应用(或误用)(In re Namenda Indirect buyer Antitrust litigation)。, 338 F.R.D. 527 (S.D.N.Y. 2021),第546页)在一个叫做“Mr。古斯误用了古诺模型”,法官罗斯林·西尔弗写道,“如果企业在价格上竞争,古诺模型就不适用。”毫无疑问,LPS公司的竞争是在价格上,而不是在数量上,因为它们是通过价格竞标来竞争的。[…]因此古诺模型不符合经济现实。公司诉lightning Prot案287楼。补充2D 1038 (D. Ariz. 2003),第1060页)。同样,在Food Lion, LLC诉Dean Foods (in re Se)一案中。牛奶反垄断诉讼),地方法院排除了原告经济专家的证词。法院声称,专家的古诺模型未能考虑相关市场的关键商业现实(2012年U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37650, 2012-1 Trade Cas)。(CCH) P77,948, 2012 WL 947106,美国地区法院。既有田纳西州。格林维尔分部,2012年3月20日,备案)关于Google Play商店反垄断诉讼。22 .美国联邦地区法院,2022年11月28日,美国加州北区地方法院,提交通过估算市场需求来确定的传输率,揭示了应用程序开发者将谷歌强加的超竞争成本转嫁给终端消费者的程度。23岁的博士。Singer认为,Android应用推广市场是一个双边市场,谷歌对此并不反对。Singer博士表示,他将罗切特-梯若尔模型用于双面Android应用销售市场。[…]“传递”率是辛格博士过度收费分析的一个关键因素,也是道伯特之争的主要争论点。总的来说,Google并没有证明Singer博士的意见是不可靠或无效的(关于Google Play商店反垄断诉讼)。,第8页后)粗略地说,当法院成功地处理三个经常相互冲突的需求时,道伯特听证会是有效的:排除不可靠的科学证据,支持陪审团的事实调查角色,最大限度地减少各方所花费的时间和费用此外,我的建议与
{"title":"Models on trial: antitrust experts face <i>Daubert</i> challenges","authors":"Edoardo Peruzzi","doi":"10.1080/1350178x.2023.2267052","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178x.2023.2267052","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTEconomists are often called upon as expert witnesses by the parties involved in antitrust litigation. One challenge they may face in US federal courts is compliance with the Daubert standard of admissibility of expert testimony. The interplay between model applicability and the Daubert standard is analyzed, suggesting the importance of distinguishing between weak applicability claims, those that state that a model’s critical assumptions are shared by the target, and strong applicability claims, those that connect empirical models and quantitative market features. Recent antitrust cases in which expert testimonies based on economic models have been assessed following the Daubert standard are examined using this framework. Some normative implications are drawn concerning how to improve judges’ assessment of model-based arguments.KEYWORDS: Modelsantitrust lawDaubertmodel applicabilityexpert testimonyJEL CLASSIFICATION: B41K21L41L44 AcknowledgementsI wish to thank Nicola Giocoli, Emrah N. Aydinonat, Uskali Mäki, Steven G. Medema, Kevin D. Hoover, as well as two anonymous reviewers, for their helpful comments and suggestions. This work has been presented in seminars at the TINT Centre for Philosophy of Social Science, University of Helsinki, and Center for the History of Political Economy, Duke University. I thank the organizers and all participants for lively discussions and useful remarks.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 In addition to antitrust law, other legal areas where economic reasoning finds an eminent place are securities regulation, employment discrimination, and patent infringement (see Chassonnery-Zaïgouche, Citation2020; Maas & Svorenčík, Citation2017).2 The name originates from Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm. Inc., 509 US 579 (1993). See below, Section 2.3 Rule 702 – Testimony by Expert Witness. Retrieved from: https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_702.4 These findings should however be taken with a certain degree of caution for it is extremely hard to build a dataset containing all and only Daubert-related challenges (see Langenfeld & Alexander, Citation2011, Appendix).5 The Daubert Tracker website reports that economics ranks fourth among the most challenged discipline under Daubert/Rule 702 after medicine, engineering, and psychology. See www.dauberttracker.com (accessed May 15, 2023).6 Merger simulation has been introduced as a methodology for antitrust enforcement in the mid-1990s and it is now considered a standard tool by antitrust authorities. For a survey on merger simulation, see Budzinski and Ruhmer (Citation2010).7 Stanford economist Robert Hall saw his testimony rejected in Concord Boat Corp v. Brunswick (207 F.3d 1039, 8th Cir., 2000) because the Cournot model proposed to describe the relevant market did not fit economic realities (see Werden et al., Citation2004, p. 89). Three years later, a federal judge excluded the plaintiff’s expert following a Daube","PeriodicalId":46507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Methodology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135901385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Economic Methodology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1