首页 > 最新文献

Reading Psychology最新文献

英文 中文
“A First Look at Teaching”: The Impact of a Tutorial Program on First-Grade Children and Their Tutors “先看教学”:辅导计划对一年级儿童及其导师的影响
IF 1.4 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-06-02 DOI: 10.1080/02702711.2023.2217167
Bethanie C. Pletcher, M. Nicol, Tracy D. Harper, Michelle Hollenbaugh, R. Johnson, Michele Staples
Abstract The purpose of this mixed methods study was to determine the effects of a tutorial program on first-grade children’s reading skills and their tutors’ (also preservice teachers) knowledge of reading instruction. Participants consisted of a group of 30 first-grade children served in the program and a control group of 30 children. Literacy assessments, a tutor survey, and observation notes taken during visits with the tutors were sources of data. Analysis of the assessment data revealed there were no significant differences between scores of the groups of children. Analyses of the tutor surveys and tutor visit observation forms revealed that serving as tutors in the program provided robust learning experiences for the tutors. Implications for the program include making adjustments in how the tutors are trained to provide reading intervention as well as how the lessons might be altered to ensure children who need additional support catch up to their peers.
摘要这项混合方法研究的目的是确定辅导计划对一年级儿童阅读技能及其导师(也是职前教师)阅读教学知识的影响。参与者包括参加该项目的30名一年级儿童和30名儿童的对照组。识字率评估、辅导教师调查以及在辅导教师访问期间所做的观察笔记是数据来源。对评估数据的分析显示,两组儿童的得分没有显著差异。对导师调查和导师访问观察表的分析表明,在该项目中担任导师为导师提供了丰富的学习经验。该项目的影响包括调整导师提供阅读干预的培训方式,以及如何改变课程,以确保需要额外支持的孩子赶上同龄人。
{"title":"“A First Look at Teaching”: The Impact of a Tutorial Program on First-Grade Children and Their Tutors","authors":"Bethanie C. Pletcher, M. Nicol, Tracy D. Harper, Michelle Hollenbaugh, R. Johnson, Michele Staples","doi":"10.1080/02702711.2023.2217167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2217167","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this mixed methods study was to determine the effects of a tutorial program on first-grade children’s reading skills and their tutors’ (also preservice teachers) knowledge of reading instruction. Participants consisted of a group of 30 first-grade children served in the program and a control group of 30 children. Literacy assessments, a tutor survey, and observation notes taken during visits with the tutors were sources of data. Analysis of the assessment data revealed there were no significant differences between scores of the groups of children. Analyses of the tutor surveys and tutor visit observation forms revealed that serving as tutors in the program provided robust learning experiences for the tutors. Implications for the program include making adjustments in how the tutors are trained to provide reading intervention as well as how the lessons might be altered to ensure children who need additional support catch up to their peers.","PeriodicalId":46567,"journal":{"name":"Reading Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42593601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Great Debate Reconsidered, with an Eye toward Struggling Beginning Readers 重新考虑大辩论,着眼于挣扎的初读者
IF 1.4 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-05-21 DOI: 10.1080/02702711.2023.2200110
Darrell Morris
Abstract In this article, I (a) overview the ebbs and flows of two beginning reading approaches (code-emphasis and balanced instruction) used in U.S. schools from 1950 to the present; (b) compare and contrast the two instructional approaches; and (c) suggest some simple assessment procedures that can be used to measure student learning. In closing, I recommend continued use and study of both methods (and possible hybrids), including the documentation of their effectiveness with at-risk readers at the mid-point and end of first grade.
摘要在这篇文章中,我(a)概述了1950年至今美国学校使用的两种开始阅读方法(代码强调和平衡教学)的兴衰;(b) 对两种教学方法进行比较和对比;以及(c)提出一些可用于衡量学生学习情况的简单评估程序。最后,我建议继续使用和研究这两种方法(以及可能的混合方法),包括在一年级的中点和结束时对有风险的读者记录它们的有效性。
{"title":"The Great Debate Reconsidered, with an Eye toward Struggling Beginning Readers","authors":"Darrell Morris","doi":"10.1080/02702711.2023.2200110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2200110","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, I (a) overview the ebbs and flows of two beginning reading approaches (code-emphasis and balanced instruction) used in U.S. schools from 1950 to the present; (b) compare and contrast the two instructional approaches; and (c) suggest some simple assessment procedures that can be used to measure student learning. In closing, I recommend continued use and study of both methods (and possible hybrids), including the documentation of their effectiveness with at-risk readers at the mid-point and end of first grade.","PeriodicalId":46567,"journal":{"name":"Reading Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48638768","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring Literacy Practices of Families Enrolled in the Imagination Library Book Gifting Program 探索参与想像图书馆赠书计划的家庭的识字实践
IF 1.4 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-04-20 DOI: 10.1080/02702711.2023.2202179
A. Prahl
Abstract Book gifting programs such as Imagination Library aim to foster a love of reading and increase children’s exposure to books and academic success. This study is a conceptual replication of previous studies focused on the Imagination Library program. To examine home literacy practices and caregiver perceptions of the Imagination Library, 149 families enrolled in Imagination Library in a central Texas county completed an online survey. Results indicated that the majority of respondents were extremely satisfied with the program and engaged in daily shared book reading. Though tips for sharing books with children are provided for program participants, the majority of respondents indicated not knowing about the tips. Parental education level significantly predicted daily reading, even when controlling for length of enrollment in the Imagination Library program which was not a significant predictor of daily reading. This study extends the literature on book gifting programs and has implications for book gifting program development and for other communities that implement Imagination Library.
像想象力图书馆这样的图书赠送项目旨在培养孩子们对阅读的热爱,增加孩子们对书籍的接触和学业上的成功。这项研究是对先前关于想象力图书馆项目的研究的概念复制。为了检验家庭扫盲实践和看护者对想象图书馆的看法,在德克萨斯州中部一个县的149个家庭注册了想象图书馆,完成了一项在线调查。结果显示,大多数受访者对该计划非常满意,并参与了日常的共享阅读。虽然为参与者提供了与孩子分享书籍的提示,但大多数受访者表示不知道这些提示。父母受教育程度显著预测每日阅读,即使在控制想像力图书馆计划的注册时间时也是如此,后者不是每日阅读的显著预测因子。本研究扩展了图书赠送计划的文献,并对图书赠送计划的发展和其他实施想象图书馆的社区具有启示意义。
{"title":"Exploring Literacy Practices of Families Enrolled in the Imagination Library Book Gifting Program","authors":"A. Prahl","doi":"10.1080/02702711.2023.2202179","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2202179","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Book gifting programs such as Imagination Library aim to foster a love of reading and increase children’s exposure to books and academic success. This study is a conceptual replication of previous studies focused on the Imagination Library program. To examine home literacy practices and caregiver perceptions of the Imagination Library, 149 families enrolled in Imagination Library in a central Texas county completed an online survey. Results indicated that the majority of respondents were extremely satisfied with the program and engaged in daily shared book reading. Though tips for sharing books with children are provided for program participants, the majority of respondents indicated not knowing about the tips. Parental education level significantly predicted daily reading, even when controlling for length of enrollment in the Imagination Library program which was not a significant predictor of daily reading. This study extends the literature on book gifting programs and has implications for book gifting program development and for other communities that implement Imagination Library.","PeriodicalId":46567,"journal":{"name":"Reading Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48427609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Problem of Reading Motivation Multidimensionality: Theoretical and Statistical Evaluation of a Reading Motivation Scale 阅读动机的多维性问题——阅读动机量表的理论与统计评价
IF 1.4 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-04-20 DOI: 10.1080/02702711.2023.2202175
Elvira Jéldrez, K. Cain, Macarena Silva, Katherine Strasser
Abstract Reading motivation is multidimensional and a critical contributor to students’ reading comprehension skill. Its multidimensionality is problematic, as there is currently no consensus on the dimensions underlying reading motivation, which are being tested through a variety of instruments that lack statistical validation. Our goal was to discuss the structure, reliability, and validity of a reading motivation scale in relation to prior theoretical proposals. The scale considered four affirming and four undermining reading motivations and was tested with 172 students from 2nd to 6th grade. Its structure was assessed using CFA and EFA. A four-factor structure had the best fit for the data: (1) Reading value and intrinsic motivation; (2) reading devalue and avoidance; (3) perceived self-efficacy; and (4) perceived difficulty. The results supported some prior theoretical distinctions, but question the appropriateness of widely used scales and suggest the need for more research on the multidimensionality of reading motivation.
摘要阅读动机是多维的,是学生阅读理解能力的关键因素。它的多维性是有问题的,因为目前对阅读动机背后的维度还没有达成共识,而阅读动机正通过各种缺乏统计验证的工具进行测试。我们的目标是讨论阅读动机量表的结构、可靠性和有效性与先前的理论建议的关系。该量表考虑了四种肯定和四种破坏阅读动机,并对172名2至6年级的学生进行了测试。使用CFA和EFA对其结构进行了评估。四因素结构最适合数据:(1)阅读价值和内在动机;(2) 阅读贬值与回避;(3) 自我效能感;以及(4)感知困难。研究结果支持了先前的一些理论区别,但对广泛使用的量表的适当性提出了质疑,并表明有必要对阅读动机的多维性进行更多的研究。
{"title":"The Problem of Reading Motivation Multidimensionality: Theoretical and Statistical Evaluation of a Reading Motivation Scale","authors":"Elvira Jéldrez, K. Cain, Macarena Silva, Katherine Strasser","doi":"10.1080/02702711.2023.2202175","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2202175","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Reading motivation is multidimensional and a critical contributor to students’ reading comprehension skill. Its multidimensionality is problematic, as there is currently no consensus on the dimensions underlying reading motivation, which are being tested through a variety of instruments that lack statistical validation. Our goal was to discuss the structure, reliability, and validity of a reading motivation scale in relation to prior theoretical proposals. The scale considered four affirming and four undermining reading motivations and was tested with 172 students from 2nd to 6th grade. Its structure was assessed using CFA and EFA. A four-factor structure had the best fit for the data: (1) Reading value and intrinsic motivation; (2) reading devalue and avoidance; (3) perceived self-efficacy; and (4) perceived difficulty. The results supported some prior theoretical distinctions, but question the appropriateness of widely used scales and suggest the need for more research on the multidimensionality of reading motivation.","PeriodicalId":46567,"journal":{"name":"Reading Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47132195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Role of Spatial Ability and Attention Shifting in Reading of Illustrated Scientific Texts: An Eye Tracking Study 空间能力和注意力转移在科学插图阅读中的作用:眼动追踪研究
IF 1.4 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-04-19 DOI: 10.1080/02702711.2023.2202186
Sungyoon Lee
Abstract The purpose of the study is to examine the role of spatial ability and attention shifting in reading of illustrated science texts. Thirty-five fourth/fifth elementary students read two science texts. Prior knowledge and retention/transfer learning outcomes were measured using researcher-developed measures. While reading, students’ eye movements were monitored with an eye-tracker. Several eye movement indices were used to reflect reading processes. Fixation count on text/picture was used to represent students’ attentional focus on text or picture. Text to text saccades and picture to picture saccades were used to reflect students’ information organization. Students’ integrative reading behavior was measured by eye movement transitions between text and picture. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and Visual Perception Skill Test were used to assess attention shifting and visuospatial working memory, respectively. Multiple regressions were conducted to examine whether students’ spatial ability and attention shifting predict text processing, picture processing, or integrative processing of text and picture. Hierarchical regressions were conducted to examine whether students’ integrative reading make unique and direct contributions to their learning outcomes. The study found that 1) both spatial ability and attention shifting are significant predictors for integrative reading behavior while they are not for other processing behaviors (i.e., text processing and picture processing) and 2) integrative reading behaviors in illustrated text reading account for significant amounts of variance in the transfer outcomes while not in the retention outcomes. This study gives practical implications on the development of visual literacy interventions and on how teachers design their instruction about science text reading.
摘要本研究旨在探讨空间能力和注意力转移在阅读插图科学文本中的作用。35名小学四年级/五年级学生阅读两篇科学课文。先验知识和保留/迁移学习结果使用研究人员开发的测量方法进行测量。在阅读时,用眼动仪监测学生的眼球运动。几个眼动指标被用来反映阅读过程。对文字/图片的注视计数用来表征学生对文字或图片的注意焦点。采用文字对文字的扫视和图片对图片的扫视来反映学生的信息组织。通过眼动在文字和图片之间的转换来衡量学生的综合阅读行为。威斯康星卡片分类测验和视觉感知技能测验分别评估注意转移和视觉空间工作记忆。多元回归检验了学生的空间能力和注意转移是否预测了文本加工、图像加工或图文综合加工。采用层次回归来检验学生的综合阅读是否对他们的学习成果有独特和直接的贡献。研究发现:(1)空间能力和注意力转移是综合阅读行为的显著预测因子,而对其他加工行为(如文字加工和图片加工)没有显著影响;(2)图文阅读中的综合阅读行为对迁移结果有显著影响,而对保留结果没有显著影响。本研究对视觉素养干预的发展和教师如何设计科学文本阅读教学具有实际意义。
{"title":"The Role of Spatial Ability and Attention Shifting in Reading of Illustrated Scientific Texts: An Eye Tracking Study","authors":"Sungyoon Lee","doi":"10.1080/02702711.2023.2202186","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2202186","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of the study is to examine the role of spatial ability and attention shifting in reading of illustrated science texts. Thirty-five fourth/fifth elementary students read two science texts. Prior knowledge and retention/transfer learning outcomes were measured using researcher-developed measures. While reading, students’ eye movements were monitored with an eye-tracker. Several eye movement indices were used to reflect reading processes. Fixation count on text/picture was used to represent students’ attentional focus on text or picture. Text to text saccades and picture to picture saccades were used to reflect students’ information organization. Students’ integrative reading behavior was measured by eye movement transitions between text and picture. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and Visual Perception Skill Test were used to assess attention shifting and visuospatial working memory, respectively. Multiple regressions were conducted to examine whether students’ spatial ability and attention shifting predict text processing, picture processing, or integrative processing of text and picture. Hierarchical regressions were conducted to examine whether students’ integrative reading make unique and direct contributions to their learning outcomes. The study found that 1) both spatial ability and attention shifting are significant predictors for integrative reading behavior while they are not for other processing behaviors (i.e., text processing and picture processing) and 2) integrative reading behaviors in illustrated text reading account for significant amounts of variance in the transfer outcomes while not in the retention outcomes. This study gives practical implications on the development of visual literacy interventions and on how teachers design their instruction about science text reading.","PeriodicalId":46567,"journal":{"name":"Reading Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48223935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Investigating the Effects and Social Validity of an Informational Text Structure Intervention for Reading and Writing in Grades Four and Five 信息文本结构干预对四、五年级学生阅读和写作的效果和社会效度调查
IF 1.4 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-04-19 DOI: 10.1080/02702711.2023.2202172
John Z. Strong
Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects and social validity of Read STOP Write, a text structure intervention for reading and writing, in grades four and five. In a cluster randomized trial, 11 teachers in three elementary schools were randomly assigned to deliver Read STOP Write or RARE Reading & Writing, an alternative treatment focused on question answering. In total, 160 students received Read STOP Write, and 191 students received RARE Reading & Writing. Data included pretest and posttest measures of students’ informational text structure identification, reading comprehension, and writing quality, and interviews to understand teachers’ perceptions of the social validity of the interventions. Student measures were analyzed using three-level hierarchical linear modeling. Teacher interviews were analyzed qualitatively using typological analysis. Results indicated that students who received Read STOP Write outperformed students who received RARE Reading & Writing on a researcher-developed measure of informational writing quality with promising effects on measures of informational text structure identification and reading comprehension skills but no effects on standardized measures of general reading comprehension or writing quality. Teacher interviews revealed that teachers perceived the goals, procedures, and effects of both interventions as socially valid. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
摘要本研究旨在探讨四年级和五年级学生阅读和写作文本结构干预的效果和社会效度。在一项集群随机试验中,三所小学的11名教师被随机分配到提供Read STOP Write或RARE Reading & Writing,这是一种侧重于问答的替代治疗。总共有160名学生接受了Read STOP Write, 191名学生接受了RARE Reading & Writing。数据包括学生信息文本结构识别、阅读理解和写作质量的测试前和测试后测量,以及了解教师对干预措施的社会有效性的看法的访谈。采用三级层次线性模型对学生测量进行分析。使用类型分析对教师访谈进行定性分析。结果表明,在研究人员开发的信息写作质量测量中,接受Read STOP Write的学生表现优于接受RARE Reading & Writing的学生,对信息文本结构识别和阅读理解技能的测量有希望产生影响,但对一般阅读理解或写作质量的标准化测量没有影响。教师访谈显示,教师认为两种干预的目标、程序和效果都是社会有效的。讨论了对研究和实践的启示。
{"title":"Investigating the Effects and Social Validity of an Informational Text Structure Intervention for Reading and Writing in Grades Four and Five","authors":"John Z. Strong","doi":"10.1080/02702711.2023.2202172","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2202172","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects and social validity of Read STOP Write, a text structure intervention for reading and writing, in grades four and five. In a cluster randomized trial, 11 teachers in three elementary schools were randomly assigned to deliver Read STOP Write or RARE Reading & Writing, an alternative treatment focused on question answering. In total, 160 students received Read STOP Write, and 191 students received RARE Reading & Writing. Data included pretest and posttest measures of students’ informational text structure identification, reading comprehension, and writing quality, and interviews to understand teachers’ perceptions of the social validity of the interventions. Student measures were analyzed using three-level hierarchical linear modeling. Teacher interviews were analyzed qualitatively using typological analysis. Results indicated that students who received Read STOP Write outperformed students who received RARE Reading & Writing on a researcher-developed measure of informational writing quality with promising effects on measures of informational text structure identification and reading comprehension skills but no effects on standardized measures of general reading comprehension or writing quality. Teacher interviews revealed that teachers perceived the goals, procedures, and effects of both interventions as socially valid. Implications for research and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46567,"journal":{"name":"Reading Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43232332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Writing in the Content Areas: Changing Teacher Perceptions with Professional Development 写作的内容领域:改变教师的观念与专业发展
IF 1.4 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-04-18 DOI: 10.1080/02702711.2023.2187906
Amanda E. Whatley, N. Smith
Abstract This research examined the impact of writing professional development and implementation on content area teachers’ pedagogical practices. Data were collected through a survey instrument and teacher reflection questionnaires for qualitative and quantitative results. Teacher participants were employees at a rural public charter high school in North Carolina. Per analysis of the data, it was determined that teacher attitude toward writing as a mode of learning was positively affected by the sustained writing professional development and implementation.
摘要本研究考察了写作专业发展和实施对内容领域教师教学实践的影响。数据是通过调查工具和教师反思问卷收集的,以获得定性和定量结果。教师参与者是北卡罗来纳州一所乡村公立特许高中的员工。通过对数据的分析,可以确定教师对写作作为一种学习模式的态度受到持续的写作专业发展和实施的积极影响。
{"title":"Writing in the Content Areas: Changing Teacher Perceptions with Professional Development","authors":"Amanda E. Whatley, N. Smith","doi":"10.1080/02702711.2023.2187906","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2187906","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This research examined the impact of writing professional development and implementation on content area teachers’ pedagogical practices. Data were collected through a survey instrument and teacher reflection questionnaires for qualitative and quantitative results. Teacher participants were employees at a rural public charter high school in North Carolina. Per analysis of the data, it was determined that teacher attitude toward writing as a mode of learning was positively affected by the sustained writing professional development and implementation.","PeriodicalId":46567,"journal":{"name":"Reading Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47032458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Effect of a Self-Regulated Intervention on Vocabulary Knowledge and Self-Regulated Learning Skills for English Language Learners 自我调节干预对英语学习者词汇知识和自我调节学习技能的影响
IF 1.4 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI: 10.1080/02702711.2023.2187908
Qizhen Deng, Guy Trainin
Abstract English language learners (ELLs) lack academic vocabulary knowledge, an essential component that explains much of the persistent achievement gap between students who start schools as ELLs and their monolingual peers. This single-subject experimental design study addressed this issue by focusing on self-regulated vocabulary learning that helps ELLs become effective and independent word learners. Nine upper elementary ELLs participated in an intervention for 16 sessions, with about 35 minutes per session. The intervention included the instruction of task-specific cognitive strategies (i.e., morphological and contextual analyses) and metacognitive strategies (i.e., goal-setting and monitoring) in authentic reading texts in social studies. Results indicated positive effects on ELLs’ vocabulary knowledge and self-regulated vocabulary learning skills. Participants were also able to generalize both cognitive and metacognitive strategies to learning of new words. A lagging effect was observed for participants with low English proficiency levels.
英语学习者(ELLs)缺乏学术词汇知识,这是解释以ELLs开始学校的学生与单语同龄人之间持续存在的成就差距的重要组成部分。这项单主题实验设计研究通过关注自我调节词汇学习来解决这个问题,帮助ELLs成为有效和独立的词汇学习者。9名小学高年级学生参加了16次干预,每次约35分钟。干预包括在社会研究的真实阅读文本中指导特定任务的认知策略(即形态和语境分析)和元认知策略(即目标设定和监控)。结果显示,对学生词汇知识和自我调节词汇学习技能有积极影响。参与者还能够总结认知和元认知策略来学习新词。在英语水平较低的参与者中观察到滞后效应。
{"title":"The Effect of a Self-Regulated Intervention on Vocabulary Knowledge and Self-Regulated Learning Skills for English Language Learners","authors":"Qizhen Deng, Guy Trainin","doi":"10.1080/02702711.2023.2187908","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2187908","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract English language learners (ELLs) lack academic vocabulary knowledge, an essential component that explains much of the persistent achievement gap between students who start schools as ELLs and their monolingual peers. This single-subject experimental design study addressed this issue by focusing on self-regulated vocabulary learning that helps ELLs become effective and independent word learners. Nine upper elementary ELLs participated in an intervention for 16 sessions, with about 35 minutes per session. The intervention included the instruction of task-specific cognitive strategies (i.e., morphological and contextual analyses) and metacognitive strategies (i.e., goal-setting and monitoring) in authentic reading texts in social studies. Results indicated positive effects on ELLs’ vocabulary knowledge and self-regulated vocabulary learning skills. Participants were also able to generalize both cognitive and metacognitive strategies to learning of new words. A lagging effect was observed for participants with low English proficiency levels.","PeriodicalId":46567,"journal":{"name":"Reading Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46686085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comprehension, Diagram Analysis, Integration, and Interest: A Cross-Sectional Analysis 理解、图表分析、整合和兴趣:一个横断面分析
IF 1.4 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-03-11 DOI: 10.1080/02702711.2023.2187907
C. Hattan, Eunseo Lee, Alexandra List
Abstract The current study examines a multidimensional set of outcome variables to understand whether different pre-reading scaffolds influence students’ text comprehension, diagram analysis, text integration, and interest; and investigates these constructs cross-sectionally to identify any progression as students move across grades. One-hundred fifty-six 3rd through 6th grade students enrolled in a public laboratory school were randomly assigned to one of three pre-reading conditions intended to activate or build students’ topic knowledge. Students completed a series of before, during, and after reading activities while engaging with grade appropriate texts about the topics of ecosystems and living things. Results indicate that there were no significant differences between the three pre-reading conditions on any of the four constructs of interest. Students across grade levels performed well on multiple-choice comprehension questions, but not as well on diagram analysis questions or an open-ended integration task. Implications and future directions are discussed.
摘要本研究考察了一组多维的结果变量,以了解不同的阅读前支架是否会影响学生的文本理解、图表分析、文本整合和兴趣;并对这些结构进行横断面调查,以确定学生在不同年级之间的进步。在一所公立实验学校注册的156名三年级至六年级学生被随机分配到三种预读条件中的一种,旨在激活或建立学生的主题知识。学生们完成了一系列阅读前、阅读中和阅读后的活动,同时参与了与年级相适应的关于生态系统和生物主题的文本。结果表明,三种阅读前条件对四种感兴趣的结构中的任何一种都没有显著差异。不同年级的学生在多项选择理解题上表现良好,但在图表分析题或开放式综合任务上表现不佳。讨论了影响和未来方向。
{"title":"Comprehension, Diagram Analysis, Integration, and Interest: A Cross-Sectional Analysis","authors":"C. Hattan, Eunseo Lee, Alexandra List","doi":"10.1080/02702711.2023.2187907","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2187907","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The current study examines a multidimensional set of outcome variables to understand whether different pre-reading scaffolds influence students’ text comprehension, diagram analysis, text integration, and interest; and investigates these constructs cross-sectionally to identify any progression as students move across grades. One-hundred fifty-six 3rd through 6th grade students enrolled in a public laboratory school were randomly assigned to one of three pre-reading conditions intended to activate or build students’ topic knowledge. Students completed a series of before, during, and after reading activities while engaging with grade appropriate texts about the topics of ecosystems and living things. Results indicate that there were no significant differences between the three pre-reading conditions on any of the four constructs of interest. Students across grade levels performed well on multiple-choice comprehension questions, but not as well on diagram analysis questions or an open-ended integration task. Implications and future directions are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46567,"journal":{"name":"Reading Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47542550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
A Teacher‑Implemented Shared‑Reading Intervention to Promote Early Literacy Skills of Preschoolers Children in Turkey 教师实施共享阅读干预,促进土耳其学龄前儿童的早期识字技能
IF 1.4 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-03-11 DOI: 10.1080/02702711.2023.2179142
E. Laçin
Abstract This study was conducted in a preschool in Hatay, Turkey. The effect of the shared-reading method on the early literacy skills of preschool children is examined. Four preschool classes (two experiments and two control) participated in the research. Tools included the intervention program, intervention checklists, interviews, and early literacy skills tests. Pretests were applied to both groups. The first took a 12-week intervention. Post-tests revealed that children in the experimental showed significant improvement and improvement in early literacy skills compared to baseline performance results. The findings provide educators with an understanding of ways to foster the development of early literacy skills at the preschool level.
摘要本研究在土耳其哈泰的一所幼儿园进行。研究了共享阅读方法对学龄前儿童早期识字技能的影响。四个学前班(两个实验班和两个对照班)参与了这项研究。工具包括干预计划、干预检查表、访谈和早期识字技能测试。两组均进行了预测试。第一次进行了为期12周的干预。后期测试显示,与基线表现结果相比,实验中的儿童在早期识字技能方面表现出显著的进步。研究结果使教育工作者了解了在学前阶段培养早期识字技能的方法。
{"title":"A Teacher‑Implemented Shared‑Reading Intervention to Promote Early Literacy Skills of Preschoolers Children in Turkey","authors":"E. Laçin","doi":"10.1080/02702711.2023.2179142","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2179142","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study was conducted in a preschool in Hatay, Turkey. The effect of the shared-reading method on the early literacy skills of preschool children is examined. Four preschool classes (two experiments and two control) participated in the research. Tools included the intervention program, intervention checklists, interviews, and early literacy skills tests. Pretests were applied to both groups. The first took a 12-week intervention. Post-tests revealed that children in the experimental showed significant improvement and improvement in early literacy skills compared to baseline performance results. The findings provide educators with an understanding of ways to foster the development of early literacy skills at the preschool level.","PeriodicalId":46567,"journal":{"name":"Reading Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49242686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Reading Psychology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1