International Development Planning Review最新文献

英文中文

Index to Volume 45 第45卷索引

4区社会学 Q1 Social Sciences

International Development Planning Review

Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI: 10.3828/idpr.2023.19

引用次数: 0

From a climate–security nexus to conflict-sensitive climate actions for peacebuilding and human security 从气候安全纽带到促进建设和平与人类安全的冲突敏感气候行动

4区社会学 Q1 Social Sciences

International Development Planning Review

Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI: 10.3828/idpr.2023.16

Md. Nadiruzzaman, Sonali John, Verena Muehlberger, Jürgen Scheffran

The climate change and security nexus is an evolving area of research and policy. At the outset of work in this field, major research concentrated on how climate change is adversely impacting human well-being. However, in recent years, academics began to reflect critically on the social, cultural and political construction of vulnerabilities and developing understandings of climate change as a risk multiplier. Different aspects of the conflict–security nexus and its future trajectories became subject to critical academic scrutiny, including at a 2021 conference at Hamburg University where more than 100 scholars of relevant research interests from across the globe discussed and debated twenty-eight presented research papers. A total of sixty-five scholars from over twenty institutions have contributed to those research papers and participated in extensive discussions. The conclusion of these discussions highlights how climate change is an opportunity to reflect upon everyday injustices in distribution and access to resources as integral to concerns with security and conflict. A holistic approach to the nexus of climate change and security is thus vital to efforts to promote and realise societal development efforts while minimising social and environmental injustice.This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0.

气候变化和安全关系是一个不断发展的研究和政策领域。在这一领域的工作开始时，主要研究集中在气候变化如何对人类福祉产生不利影响。然而，近年来，学者们开始批判性地反思脆弱性的社会、文化和政治建构，并逐渐认识到气候变化是风险倍增器。冲突与安全关系的不同方面及其未来轨迹成为重要学术审查的对象，包括2021年在汉堡大学举行的一次会议上，来自全球各地的100多名相关研究兴趣的学者讨论和辩论了28份提交的研究论文。来自20多个机构的65位学者为这些研究论文做出了贡献，并参与了广泛的讨论。这些讨论的结论强调，气候变化是一个机会，可以反思日常分配和获取资源方面的不公正现象，将其视为安全和冲突问题的组成部分。因此，对气候变化和安全之间的关系采取全面办法，对于促进和实现社会发展努力，同时尽量减少社会和环境不公正的努力至关重要。本文以CC BY许可方式发布:https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0。

{"title":"From a climate–security nexus to conflict-sensitive climate actions for peacebuilding and human security","authors":"Md. Nadiruzzaman, Sonali John, Verena Muehlberger, Jürgen Scheffran","doi":"10.3828/idpr.2023.16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2023.16","url":null,"abstract":"The climate change and security nexus is an evolving area of research and policy. At the outset of work in this field, major research concentrated on how climate change is adversely impacting human well-being. However, in recent years, academics began to reflect critically on the social, cultural and political construction of vulnerabilities and developing understandings of climate change as a risk multiplier. Different aspects of the conflict–security nexus and its future trajectories became subject to critical academic scrutiny, including at a 2021 conference at Hamburg University where more than 100 scholars of relevant research interests from across the globe discussed and debated twenty-eight presented research papers. A total of sixty-five scholars from over twenty institutions have contributed to those research papers and participated in extensive discussions. The conclusion of these discussions highlights how climate change is an opportunity to reflect upon everyday injustices in distribution and access to resources as integral to concerns with security and conflict. A holistic approach to the nexus of climate change and security is thus vital to efforts to promote and realise societal development efforts while minimising social and environmental injustice.This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0.","PeriodicalId":46625,"journal":{"name":"International Development Planning Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135483020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Causal connections between climate change and disaster: the politics of ‘victimhood’ framing and blaming 气候变化和灾难之间的因果关系:“受害者”的政治框架和指责

4区社会学 Q1 Social Sciences

International Development Planning Review

Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI: 10.3828/idpr.2023.17

Hosna J. Shewly, Md. Nadiruzzaman, Jeroen Warner

Popular climate change narratives often identify climate change as the prime trigger of all environmental hazards. Consistent and harmonised framing of this relationship by public media, epistemic communities and established institutions continually shapes and reinforces such narratives. These dominant narratives may present an image of an apocalyptic future beyond the coping capacity of ‘climate victims’ (often identified – implicitly or explicitly – as the poor and those living in the majority work) while rendering climate change responsible for all disaster-related miseries. Such ‘doomsday’, ‘victimhood’, and ‘common villain’ strings of a convergent narrative use selective and occasional recourse to science to support a generic understanding of the challenge of climate change. Drawing on examples of recent environmental stresses in Bangladesh, we call for local accountability and highlight the ‘scale effect’ of politics of vulnerability framing.This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0.

流行的气候变化叙事往往将气候变化视为所有环境危害的主要诱因。公共媒体、认知社区和既定机构对这种关系的一致和协调框架不断塑造和强化这种叙述。这些占主导地位的叙述可能呈现出一种世界末日未来的形象，超出了“气候受害者”(通常含蓄或明确地确定为穷人和那些生活在大多数工作中的人)的应对能力，同时将气候变化归咎于所有与灾害相关的痛苦。这样的“世界末日”、“受害者”和“共同的恶棍”等一系列趋同的叙述选择性地和偶尔地求助于科学来支持对气候变化挑战的一般理解。以孟加拉国最近的环境压力为例，我们呼吁地方问责制，并强调脆弱性框架政治的“规模效应”。本文以CC BY许可方式发布:https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0。

引用次数: 0

Ecologies of sustainable development goals: a mid-term perspective 可持续发展目标的生态学:中期展望