首页 > 最新文献

Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS最新文献

英文 中文
Reliability of Diagnostic Tests for Movement System Impairment-based Categories of Mechanical Neck Pain. 基于运动系统损伤的机械性颈痛分类诊断测试的可靠性。
IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.79331.3635
Mehrnoosh Amin, Amin Behdarvandan, Maryam Saadat, Armin Jahangiri Babadi, Payam Amini, Frouzan Orak

Objectives: The aim of the current study was to investigate the inter-tester reliability of the MSI classification test items in patients with neck pain.

Methods: sixty subjects with neck pain (18-65 years) participated in this cross-sectional study. The examination of each patient, included the evaluation of signs and symptoms during posture and movement tests and the MSI diagnosis of subjects with cervical pain, was performed simultaneously by three testers in one session. Kappa and gamma values were used to determine the measure of agreement between testers for each of the test items and classification judgment.

Results: The kappa values for inter-tester reliability of the sign items ranged from 0.36 to 1. For the symptom items kappa values ranged from 0.36 to 1. The kappa values of inter-tester reliability for patients' classification judgments ranged from 0.71 to 0.73.

Conclusion: The inter-tester reliability between three testers according to the MSI approach for neck pain classification, sign and symptom was generally acceptable.

目的:本研究旨在探讨颈痛患者MSI分类测试项目的测试者间信度。方法:60例颈部疼痛患者(18-65岁)参加横断面研究。每位患者的检查,包括姿势和运动测试期间的体征和症状评估以及颈椎疼痛受试者的MSI诊断,由三名测试人员在一次会议中同时进行。Kappa和gamma值用于确定测试者之间对每个测试项目和分类判断的一致性度量。结果:各标志项目的测者间信度kappa值在0.36 ~ 1之间。症状项的kappa值为0.36 ~ 1。患者分类判断的检验间信度kappa值在0.71 ~ 0.73之间。结论:采用MSI方法进行颈部疼痛分类、体征和症状的三种测试者间信度基本可以接受。
{"title":"Reliability of Diagnostic Tests for Movement System Impairment-based Categories of Mechanical Neck Pain.","authors":"Mehrnoosh Amin, Amin Behdarvandan, Maryam Saadat, Armin Jahangiri Babadi, Payam Amini, Frouzan Orak","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2024.79331.3635","DOIUrl":"10.22038/ABJS.2024.79331.3635","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the current study was to investigate the inter-tester reliability of the MSI classification test items in patients with neck pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>sixty subjects with neck pain (18-65 years) participated in this cross-sectional study. The examination of each patient, included the evaluation of signs and symptoms during posture and movement tests and the MSI diagnosis of subjects with cervical pain, was performed simultaneously by three testers in one session. Kappa and gamma values were used to determine the measure of agreement between testers for each of the test items and classification judgment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The kappa values for inter-tester reliability of the sign items ranged from 0.36 to 1. For the symptom items kappa values ranged from 0.36 to 1. The kappa values of inter-tester reliability for patients' classification judgments ranged from 0.71 to 0.73.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The inter-tester reliability between three testers according to the MSI approach for neck pain classification, sign and symptom was generally acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"13 2","pages":"106-113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836796/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143469511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Patient-Specific Functional Scale in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. 波斯语版慢性腰痛患者特异性功能量表的翻译、跨文化适应和心理测量特性
IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.76731.3546
Afshin Aghazadeh, Soheil Mansour Sohani, Reza Salehi, Mohamad Parnianpour

Objectives: The major emphasis of physical therapy in patient evaluation is the assessment of physical function, and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) is one of the most commonly used instruments for this purpose. Therefore, the present study aims to translate and cross-culturally adapt the PSFS into Persian and test its psychometric properties in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP).

Methods: The PSFS was translated from English to Persian and cross-culturally adapted in accordance with the study by Beaton et al. Psychometric properties of 100 CLBP patients were assessed. Reliability (internal consistency and test-retest) was examined for 32 participants who completed the Persian version of the PSFS (PSFS-P) twice with one week interval. Construct validity was assessed against the Persian versions of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI-P) and the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS-P).

Results: The PSFS-P showed excellent reliability (Cronbach's alpha=0.88, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC 3, 1] =0.95, 95% CI [0.87 to 0.98]). The construct validity analysis revealed a moderate negative correlation between PSFS-P and NPRS-P (r=-0.47) and a high negative correlation between PSFS-P and ODI-P (r=-0.61). The PSFS-P showed no floor and ceiling effects.

Conclusion: The PSFS-P has adequate psychometric properties and is applicable in both clinical settings and research involving the Iranian population with CLBP.

目的:物理治疗在患者评估中的主要重点是身体功能的评估,而患者特异性功能量表(PSFS)是最常用的工具之一。因此,本研究旨在将PSFS翻译成波斯语并跨文化适应,并测试其在慢性腰痛(CLBP)患者中的心理测量特性。方法:根据Beaton等人的研究,将PSFS从英语翻译成波斯语,并进行跨文化改编。对100例CLBP患者进行心理测量。对32名完成波斯语版PSFS (PSFS- p)两次,间隔一周的参与者进行信度(内部一致性和重测)检验。根据波斯语版本的Oswestry残疾指数(ODI-P)和数字疼痛评定量表(nrs - p)评估结构效度。结果:PSFS-P具有良好的信度(Cronbach's alpha=0.88,类内相关系数[ICC 3,1] =0.95, 95% CI[0.87 ~ 0.98])。建构效度分析显示PSFS-P与NPRS-P呈中度负相关(r=-0.47), PSFS-P与ODI-P呈高度负相关(r=-0.61)。PSFS-P无下限和上限效应。结论:PSFS-P具有足够的心理测量特性,适用于临床环境和涉及伊朗CLBP人群的研究。
{"title":"Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Patient-Specific Functional Scale in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.","authors":"Afshin Aghazadeh, Soheil Mansour Sohani, Reza Salehi, Mohamad Parnianpour","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2024.76731.3546","DOIUrl":"10.22038/ABJS.2024.76731.3546","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The major emphasis of physical therapy in patient evaluation is the assessment of physical function, and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) is one of the most commonly used instruments for this purpose. Therefore, the present study aims to translate and cross-culturally adapt the PSFS into Persian and test its psychometric properties in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PSFS was translated from English to Persian and cross-culturally adapted in accordance with the study by Beaton et al. Psychometric properties of 100 CLBP patients were assessed. Reliability (internal consistency and test-retest) was examined for 32 participants who completed the Persian version of the PSFS (PSFS-P) twice with one week interval. Construct validity was assessed against the Persian versions of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI-P) and the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS-P).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PSFS-P showed excellent reliability (Cronbach's alpha=0.88, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC <sub>3, 1</sub>] =0.95, 95% CI [0.87 to 0.98]). The construct validity analysis revealed a moderate negative correlation between PSFS-P and NPRS-P (r=-0.47) and a high negative correlation between PSFS-P and ODI-P (r=-0.61). The PSFS-P showed no floor and ceiling effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PSFS-P has adequate psychometric properties and is applicable in both clinical settings and research involving the Iranian population with CLBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"13 1","pages":"47-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11776382/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143067697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From Algorithms to Academia: An Endeavor to Benchmark AI-Generated Scientific Papers against Human Standards. 从算法到学术界:将人工智能生成的科学论文与人类标准进行比较。
IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.80093.3669
Jackson Woodrow, Nour Nassour, John Y Kwon, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani, Mitchel Harris

Objectives: The aim of this study is to quantitatively investigate the accuracy of text generated by AI large language models while comparing their readability and likelihood of being accepted to a scientific compared to human-authored papers on the same topics.

Methods: The study consisted of two papers written by ChatGPT, two papers written by Assistant by scite, and two papers written by humans. A total of six independent reviewers were blinded to the authorship of each paper and assigned a grade to each subsection on a scale of 1 to 4. Additionally, each reviewer was asked to guess if the paper was written by a human or AI and explain their reasoning. The study authors also graded each AI-generated paper based on factual accuracy of the claims and citations.

Results: The human-written calcaneus fracture paper received the highest score of a 3.70/4, followed by Assistant-written calcaneus fracture paper (3.02/4), human-written ankle osteoarthritis paper (2.98/4), ChatGPT calcaneus fracture (2.89/4), ChatGPT Ankle Osteoarthritis (2.87/4), and Assistant Ankle Osteoarthritis (2.78/4). The human calcaneus fracture paper received a statistically significant higher rating than the ChatGPT calcaneus fracture paper (P = 0.028) and the Assistant calcaneus fracture paper (P = 0.043). The ChatGPT osteoarthritis review showed 100% factual accuracy, the ChatGPT calcaneus fracture review was 97.46% factually accurate, the Assistant calcaneus fracture was 95.56% accurate, and the Assistant ankle osteoarthritis was 94.98% accurate. Regarding citations, the ChatGPT ankle osteoarthritis paper was 90% accurate, the ChatGPT calcaneus fracture was 69.23% accurate, the Assistant ankle osteoarthritis was 35.14% accurate, and the Assistant calcaneus fracture was 39.68% accurate.

Conclusion: Through this paper we emphasize that while AI holds the promise of enhancing knowledge sharing, it must be used responsibly and in conjunction with comprehensive fact-checking procedures to maintain the integrity of the scientific discourse.

目的:本研究的目的是定量调查人工智能大型语言模型生成的文本的准确性,同时比较它们的可读性和被科学论文接受的可能性,并将其与人类撰写的论文进行比较。方法:由ChatGPT撰写两篇论文,Assistant通过sciite撰写两篇论文,人工撰写两篇论文。共有六名独立的审稿人对每篇论文的作者进行了盲检,并对每个部分按1到4的等级进行了评分。此外,每位审稿人都被要求猜测论文是由人类还是人工智能撰写的,并解释他们的推理。该研究的作者还根据声明和引用的事实准确性对每篇人工智能生成的论文进行了评分。结果:人写跟骨骨折论文得分最高,为3.70/4,其次是辅助写跟骨骨折论文(3.02/4)、踝关节骨关节炎论文(2.98/4)、ChatGPT跟骨骨折论文(2.89/4)、ChatGPT踝关节骨关节炎论文(2.87/4)、辅助写踝关节骨关节炎论文(2.78/4)。人跟骨骨折纸的评分高于ChatGPT跟骨骨折纸(P = 0.028)和Assistant跟骨骨折纸(P = 0.043),具有统计学意义。ChatGPT骨关节炎回顾的事实准确性为100%,ChatGPT跟骨骨折回顾的事实准确性为97.46%,助理跟骨骨折回顾的事实准确性为95.56%,助理踝关节骨关节炎回顾的事实准确性为94.98%。在引文方面,ChatGPT踝骨关节炎论文的准确率为90%,ChatGPT跟骨骨折论文的准确率为69.23%,Assistant踝骨关节炎论文的准确率为35.14%,Assistant跟骨骨折论文的准确率为39.68%。结论:通过本文,我们强调,虽然人工智能有望加强知识共享,但必须负责任地使用它,并与全面的事实核查程序相结合,以保持科学话语的完整性。
{"title":"From Algorithms to Academia: An Endeavor to Benchmark AI-Generated Scientific Papers against Human Standards.","authors":"Jackson Woodrow, Nour Nassour, John Y Kwon, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani, Mitchel Harris","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2024.80093.3669","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2024.80093.3669","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to quantitatively investigate the accuracy of text generated by AI large language models while comparing their readability and likelihood of being accepted to a scientific compared to human-authored papers on the same topics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study consisted of two papers written by ChatGPT, two papers written by Assistant by scite, and two papers written by humans. A total of six independent reviewers were blinded to the authorship of each paper and assigned a grade to each subsection on a scale of 1 to 4. Additionally, each reviewer was asked to guess if the paper was written by a human or AI and explain their reasoning. The study authors also graded each AI-generated paper based on factual accuracy of the claims and citations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The human-written calcaneus fracture paper received the highest score of a 3.70/4, followed by Assistant-written calcaneus fracture paper (3.02/4), human-written ankle osteoarthritis paper (2.98/4), ChatGPT calcaneus fracture (2.89/4), ChatGPT Ankle Osteoarthritis (2.87/4), and Assistant Ankle Osteoarthritis (2.78/4). The human calcaneus fracture paper received a statistically significant higher rating than the ChatGPT calcaneus fracture paper (P = 0.028) and the Assistant calcaneus fracture paper (P = 0.043). The ChatGPT osteoarthritis review showed 100% factual accuracy, the ChatGPT calcaneus fracture review was 97.46% factually accurate, the Assistant calcaneus fracture was 95.56% accurate, and the Assistant ankle osteoarthritis was 94.98% accurate. Regarding citations, the ChatGPT ankle osteoarthritis paper was 90% accurate, the ChatGPT calcaneus fracture was 69.23% accurate, the Assistant ankle osteoarthritis was 35.14% accurate, and the Assistant calcaneus fracture was 39.68% accurate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Through this paper we emphasize that while AI holds the promise of enhancing knowledge sharing, it must be used responsibly and in conjunction with comprehensive fact-checking procedures to maintain the integrity of the scientific discourse.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"13 4","pages":"212-222"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12050080/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143990197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Total Ankle Replacement in Hemophilia. 血友病的全踝关节置换术。
IF 1.8 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2025.85093.3876
E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan

The objective of this paper is to carry out a review of the literature on the contemporary situation of total ankle replacement (TAR) in people with hemophilia (PWH). A search was performed in PubMed on December 29, 2024, utilizing the keywords "hemophilia" and "total ankle replacement." To date solely 8 papers (136 TARs) in 103 PWH have been reported. All published series showed improvement in preoperative pain and function. However, the complication rate was 8.8% (intra-operative fractures of the medial malleolus, delayed wound healings, hematomas). Additional surgery is required in 5.1% of the TARs implanted (ankle arthrolysis due to painful arthrofibrosis, major surgeries, revision surgeries). The estimated 10-year survival free of any TAR removal or ankle fusion (AF) is 92.2%. Regarding the controversy AF or TAR in PWH, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis have found similar clinical results and rates of adverse events between TAR and AF in PWH.

本文的目的是对血友病(PWH)患者全踝置换术(TAR)的当代情况进行文献综述。2024年12月29日在PubMed上进行了一次搜索,关键词是“血友病”和“全踝关节置换术”。迄今为止,103个PWH仅报告了8篇论文(136篇论文)。所有已发表的系列研究均显示术前疼痛和功能改善。然而,并发症发生率为8.8%(术中内踝骨折,伤口愈合延迟,血肿)。5.1%的TARs植入者需要进行额外的手术(由于疼痛的关节纤维化导致的踝关节松解、大手术、翻修手术)。无任何TAR移除或踝关节融合(AF)的估计10年生存率为92.2%。关于房颤或房颤在PWH中的争议,最近的一项系统综述和荟萃分析发现,房颤和房颤在PWH中的临床结果和不良事件发生率相似。
{"title":"Total Ankle Replacement in Hemophilia.","authors":"E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2025.85093.3876","DOIUrl":"10.22038/ABJS.2025.85093.3876","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this paper is to carry out a review of the literature on the contemporary situation of total ankle replacement (TAR) in people with hemophilia (PWH). A search was performed in PubMed on December 29, 2024, utilizing the keywords \"hemophilia\" and \"total ankle replacement.\" To date solely 8 papers (136 TARs) in 103 PWH have been reported. All published series showed improvement in preoperative pain and function. However, the complication rate was 8.8% (intra-operative fractures of the medial malleolus, delayed wound healings, hematomas). Additional surgery is required in 5.1% of the TARs implanted (ankle arthrolysis due to painful arthrofibrosis, major surgeries, revision surgeries). The estimated 10-year survival free of any TAR removal or ankle fusion (AF) is 92.2%. Regarding the controversy AF or TAR in PWH, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis have found similar clinical results and rates of adverse events between TAR and AF in PWH.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"13 10","pages":"663-667"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12576326/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145432593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Periarticular Versus Intravenous Corticosteroids in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. 全膝关节置换术中关节周围与静脉注射皮质类固醇:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2025.84324.3834
Ralph Maroun, Mohammad Daher, Jonathan Liu, Alan H Daniels, Thomas J Barrett, Mouhanad M El-Othmani

Objectives: Despite the extensive research revolving around total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the optimal steroid administration route remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of intravenous (IV) to periarticular (PA) steroid administration in TKA.

Methods: Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were searched till April 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing IV to PA steroids in TKA. Each trial was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and classified as having a High, Low, or Unclear risk of bias. The clinical outcomes of interest were post-operative pain (reported as the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)), vomiting, post-operative range of motion (reported as knee flexion angle), post-operative IL-6 and CRP, and glucose levels. Post-operative complications such as surgical site or deep infections, and wound dehiscence following TKA were also recorded and assessed.

Results: Five RCTs with a total of 501 patients were included in this review. There were no significant differences in pain at rest on post-operative day (POD) 1 and 2 and during activity between PA and IV administration, while pain at rest on POD 3 was lower in the PA group (I2 =38% SMD=-0.27; 95% CI: -0.5, -0.04, P=0.02). Post-operative complications, knee flexion, and laboratory values such as IL-6, CPR, and glucose showed no significant difference between the groups, while vomiting rates were significantly higher in the PA group (I2= 0% OR=2.43; 95% CI: 1.36-4.35, P=0.003).

Conclusion: PA and IV peri-operative administration of glucocorticoids in TKA have similar clinical outcomes in inflammation reduction, knee flexion function, adverse event rates, and post-operative pain at rest during the first 48 hours post-operatively and at activity, while the PA group is associated with lower pain at rest on POD 3 and a higher rate of post-operative vomiting.

目的:尽管围绕全膝关节置换术(TKA)进行了广泛的研究,但最佳类固醇给药途径仍不清楚。本研究旨在比较静脉注射(IV)和关节周围注射(PA)类固醇治疗TKA的临床疗效。方法:检索Embase、PubMed、Cochrane和谷歌Scholar,检索截至2024年4月比较IV和PA类固醇治疗TKA的随机对照试验(RCT)。每个试验使用Cochrane风险偏倚工具进行评估,并将其分类为高、低或不明确的偏倚风险。临床结果包括术后疼痛(以视觉模拟量表(VAS)和数值评定量表(NRS)报告)、呕吐、术后活动范围(以膝关节屈曲角度报告)、术后IL-6和CRP以及血糖水平。术后并发症,如手术部位或深部感染,TKA后伤口裂开也被记录和评估。结果:本综述纳入了5项随机对照试验,共501例患者。PA组和IV组术后第1、2天休息时疼痛和活动时疼痛无显著差异,而PA组术后第3天休息时疼痛较低(I2 =38% SMD=-0.27;95% ci: -0.5, -0.04, p =0.02)。术后并发症、膝关节屈曲、IL-6、心肺复苏术、血糖等实验室指标在两组间无显著差异,而PA组呕吐率明显高于PA组(I2= 0% OR=2.43;95% ci: 1.36-4.35, p =0.003)。结论:全膝关节置换术围手术期给予糖皮质激素与静脉给予糖皮质激素在消炎、膝关节屈曲功能、不良事件发生率、术后48小时及活动时静息疼痛方面具有相似的临床结果,而PA组POD 3静息疼痛较低,术后呕吐率较高。
{"title":"Periarticular Versus Intravenous Corticosteroids in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Ralph Maroun, Mohammad Daher, Jonathan Liu, Alan H Daniels, Thomas J Barrett, Mouhanad M El-Othmani","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2025.84324.3834","DOIUrl":"10.22038/ABJS.2025.84324.3834","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite the extensive research revolving around total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the optimal steroid administration route remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of intravenous (IV) to periarticular (PA) steroid administration in TKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were searched till April 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing IV to PA steroids in TKA. Each trial was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and classified as having a High, Low, or Unclear risk of bias. The clinical outcomes of interest were post-operative pain (reported as the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)), vomiting, post-operative range of motion (reported as knee flexion angle), post-operative IL-6 and CRP, and glucose levels. Post-operative complications such as surgical site or deep infections, and wound dehiscence following TKA were also recorded and assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five RCTs with a total of 501 patients were included in this review. There were no significant differences in pain at rest on post-operative day (POD) 1 and 2 and during activity between PA and IV administration, while pain at rest on POD 3 was lower in the PA group (I2 =38% SMD=-0.27; 95% CI: -0.5, -0.04, P=0.02). Post-operative complications, knee flexion, and laboratory values such as IL-6, CPR, and glucose showed no significant difference between the groups, while vomiting rates were significantly higher in the PA group (I2= 0% OR=2.43; 95% CI: 1.36-4.35, P=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PA and IV peri-operative administration of glucocorticoids in TKA have similar clinical outcomes in inflammation reduction, knee flexion function, adverse event rates, and post-operative pain at rest during the first 48 hours post-operatively and at activity, while the PA group is associated with lower pain at rest on POD 3 and a higher rate of post-operative vomiting.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"13 5","pages":"237-248"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232571/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144592603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Structural Failure After Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction: Factors Affecting Clinical Outcomes. 肩锁关节重建术后结构失效:影响临床结果的因素。
IF 1.8 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2025.88607.4017
Benjamin Read Campbell, Omar Sarhan, Ryan Lopez, Hamd Mahmood, Cassandra Sanko, Surena Namdari

Objectives: Management of acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries remains controversial regarding ideal surgical indications and technique. While loss of reduction following AC reconstruction is common, its relationship to clinical outcomes is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes and potential predictors of suboptimal results in patients with structural failure following AC reconstruction.

Methods: Patients with structural failure following AC reconstruction from 2013-2019 were identified, defined as 50% loss of coronal AC joint reduction between immediate and final postoperative radiographs. Failures were categorized by degree of displacement and mechanism, which included traumatic reinjury versus spontaneous subsidence of AC reduction. Suboptimal clinical outcomes were defined as undergoing reoperation or postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score less than 80. Bivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for suboptimal clinical results and compare outcomes between operative versus nonoperative management of structural failure.

Results: Twenty-nine patients were evaluated with mean follow-up of 7.4 years (range 4.0-10.5 years). 21% underwent revision surgery (n = 6) and 79% were treated nonoperatively (n = 23). Mean postoperative ASES, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores at final follow-up were 82 +/- 20 (range 33-100), 1.6 +/- 2.2 (range 0-7), and 82 +/- 20 (range 22-100) respectively. 41% of the total cohort (n = 12) had a suboptimal clinical result. On bivariate analysis, structural failure following acute reinjury was associated with suboptimal clinical outcomes (50% vs 6%, p = 0.011) and a higher likelihood of reoperation (67% vs 13%, p = 0.018).

Conclusion: Structural failures of AC reconstruction following an acute injury are more likely to experience suboptimal clinical outcomes and undergo reoperation compared to spontaneous loss of reduction. Larger analyses are warranted to determine if there are additional factors which may affect outcomes and guide management in these clinical scenarios.

目的:肩锁关节损伤的手术适应证和治疗方法仍有争议。虽然AC重建后复位丢失很常见,但其与临床结果的关系尚不确定。本研究的目的是评估AC重建后结构衰竭患者的预后和潜在预测因素。方法:选取2013-2019年冠状动脉交流关节重建后结构失效的患者,定义为在术后即刻和最终x线片之间冠状动脉交流关节复位损失50%。失效按移位程度和机制分类,包括创伤性再损伤和AC复位的自发沉降。再手术或术后美国肩肘外科医生(American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, ASES)评分低于80分的临床结果为次优。进行双变量分析以确定导致临床结果不理想的危险因素,并比较手术与非手术治疗结构衰竭的结果。结果:29例患者被评估,平均随访7.4年(4.0-10.5年)。21%接受了翻修手术(n = 6), 79%接受了非手术治疗(n = 23)。最终随访时,术后平均asa、数值评定量表(NRS)和单一评估数值评价(SANE)评分分别为82 +/- 20(范围33-100)、1.6 +/- 2.2(范围0-7)和82 +/- 20(范围22-100)。总队列中41% (n = 12)的临床结果不理想。在双变量分析中,急性再损伤后的结构衰竭与不理想的临床结果(50%对6%,p = 0.011)和更高的再手术可能性(67%对13%,p = 0.018)相关。结论:与自发复位丧失相比,急性损伤后AC重建的结构失败更有可能出现不理想的临床结果并需要再次手术。更大规模的分析是有必要的,以确定是否有其他因素可能影响这些临床情况的结果和指导管理。
{"title":"Structural Failure After Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction: Factors Affecting Clinical Outcomes.","authors":"Benjamin Read Campbell, Omar Sarhan, Ryan Lopez, Hamd Mahmood, Cassandra Sanko, Surena Namdari","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2025.88607.4017","DOIUrl":"10.22038/ABJS.2025.88607.4017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Management of acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries remains controversial regarding ideal surgical indications and technique. While loss of reduction following AC reconstruction is common, its relationship to clinical outcomes is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes and potential predictors of suboptimal results in patients with structural failure following AC reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with structural failure following AC reconstruction from 2013-2019 were identified, defined as 50% loss of coronal AC joint reduction between immediate and final postoperative radiographs. Failures were categorized by degree of displacement and mechanism, which included traumatic reinjury versus spontaneous subsidence of AC reduction. Suboptimal clinical outcomes were defined as undergoing reoperation or postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score less than 80. Bivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for suboptimal clinical results and compare outcomes between operative versus nonoperative management of structural failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine patients were evaluated with mean follow-up of 7.4 years (range 4.0-10.5 years). 21% underwent revision surgery (n = 6) and 79% were treated nonoperatively (n = 23). Mean postoperative ASES, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores at final follow-up were 82 +/- 20 (range 33-100), 1.6 +/- 2.2 (range 0-7), and 82 +/- 20 (range 22-100) respectively. 41% of the total cohort (n = 12) had a suboptimal clinical result. On bivariate analysis, structural failure following acute reinjury was associated with suboptimal clinical outcomes (50% vs 6%, p = 0.011) and a higher likelihood of reoperation (67% vs 13%, p = 0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Structural failures of AC reconstruction following an acute injury are more likely to experience suboptimal clinical outcomes and undergo reoperation compared to spontaneous loss of reduction. Larger analyses are warranted to determine if there are additional factors which may affect outcomes and guide management in these clinical scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"13 12","pages":"807-815"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12777675/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145935101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reliability of Image J. Software to Evaluate the Craniovertebral Angle in Participants with and without Neck Pain. Image J. Software评估有无颈部疼痛受试者颅椎角的可靠性。
IF 1.8 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2025.86598.3935
Fatemeh Binaei, Amir Hossein Kahlaee, Mohammad Ali Mohseni Bandpei, Nahid Rahmani, Cyrus Taghizadeh Delkhoush, Mohammad Saatchi, Hamidreza Goudarzi

Objectives: Forward head posture (FHP) is one of the most common postural disorders affecting the head and neck region, typically assessed by measuring the craniovertebral angle (CVA). Selecting an appropriate tool for quantifying this angle is crucial. The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of ImageJ software in assessing the CVA in participants with and without neck pain.

Methods: The study included twenty participants with neck pain and twenty without. Reflective markers were placed on the tragus of the ear and the spinous process of C7. Three lateral images were captured from the dominant side while the participants were seated, with measurements taken at two-hour and one-week intervals. The craniovertebral angle (CVA) was then analyzed using ImageJ software.

Results: The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) values for both within-day and between-day reliability in both groups ranged from 0.89 to 0.94. The Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) ranged from 0.92° to 1.02°, while the Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) values ranged from 2.56° to 2.84°. Furthermore, the absolute Technical Error of Measurement (TEM) ranged from 0.91° to 1.06°, and the relative TEM (rTEM) ranged from 2.13% to 2.42%.

Conclusion: ImageJ software appears to be a suitable tool for assessing the craniovertebral angle (CVA) in individuals with or without neck pain, demonstrating good to excellent reliability.

目的:前倾头位(FHP)是影响头颈部最常见的体位疾病之一,通常通过测量颅椎角(CVA)来评估。选择一个合适的工具来量化这个角度是至关重要的。本研究的主要目的是评估ImageJ软件在评估有和没有颈部疼痛的参与者的CVA时的可靠性。方法:本研究包括20例颈部疼痛患者和20例非颈部疼痛患者。在耳屏和C7棘突处放置反射标记。当参与者坐着的时候,从主导侧拍摄三张侧面图像,每隔两小时和一周进行测量。应用ImageJ软件分析颅椎角(CVA)。结果:两组的日内信度和日内信度的类内相关系数(ICC)值在0.89 ~ 0.94之间。测量标准误差(SEM)范围为0.92°~ 1.02°,最小可检测变化(MDC)值范围为2.56°~ 2.84°。绝对技术测量误差(TEM)范围为0.91°~ 1.06°,相对TEM (rTEM)范围为2.13% ~ 2.42%。结论:ImageJ软件是评估有或无颈部疼痛个体颅椎角(CVA)的合适工具,具有良好到极好的可靠性。
{"title":"Reliability of Image J. Software to Evaluate the Craniovertebral Angle in Participants with and without Neck Pain.","authors":"Fatemeh Binaei, Amir Hossein Kahlaee, Mohammad Ali Mohseni Bandpei, Nahid Rahmani, Cyrus Taghizadeh Delkhoush, Mohammad Saatchi, Hamidreza Goudarzi","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2025.86598.3935","DOIUrl":"10.22038/ABJS.2025.86598.3935","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Forward head posture (FHP) is one of the most common postural disorders affecting the head and neck region, typically assessed by measuring the craniovertebral angle (CVA). Selecting an appropriate tool for quantifying this angle is crucial. The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of ImageJ software in assessing the CVA in participants with and without neck pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included twenty participants with neck pain and twenty without. Reflective markers were placed on the tragus of the ear and the spinous process of C7. Three lateral images were captured from the dominant side while the participants were seated, with measurements taken at two-hour and one-week intervals. The craniovertebral angle (CVA) was then analyzed using ImageJ software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) values for both within-day and between-day reliability in both groups ranged from 0.89 to 0.94. The Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) ranged from 0.92° to 1.02°, while the Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) values ranged from 2.56° to 2.84°. Furthermore, the absolute Technical Error of Measurement (TEM) ranged from 0.91° to 1.06°, and the relative TEM (rTEM) ranged from 2.13% to 2.42%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ImageJ software appears to be a suitable tool for assessing the craniovertebral angle (CVA) in individuals with or without neck pain, demonstrating good to excellent reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"13 12","pages":"849-856"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12777732/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145935155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Regorafenib's Effectiveness and Safety in the Treatment of Bone Sarcoma. 瑞非尼治疗骨肉瘤有效性和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
IF 1.8 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2025.87671.3969
Mohsen Rahmanian, Sara Khoropanah, Sepehr Hosseinzadeh Moghaddam, Abulfazl Vatankhah, Elaheh Abdi Bastamie, Soheila Roashanzamir, Amir Rahmanian Sharifabad, Reza Ganji

Objectives: Bone sarcomas are rare, aggressive tumors with poor outcomes and limited systemic options in advanced stages. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated its efficacy and safety in bone sarcomas using randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for RCTs published from September 27, 2012, to October 14, 2024. After removing duplicates, 350 records were screened, and five RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool. Meta-analyses were performed with a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was evaluated using I² statistics. All analyses were conducted using R version 4.3.1.

Results: A total of 350 records were screened after duplicate removal, of which 339 were excluded based on title and abstract. Eleven full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and six were excluded for not meeting RCT criteria, resulting in five RCTs being included. Most had metastatic disease at baseline. Regorafenib significantly improved PFS (MD = 9.69 weeks; 95% CI: 4.54-14.84; I² = 0%), with no statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit (MD = 0.85 weeks; 95% CI: -36.33 to 38.02; I² = 0%). These findings were consistent across studies and histological subtypes. All pooled analyses demonstrated zero or near-zero heterogeneity (I² = 0%), indicating highly consistent treatment effects among trials. No significant between-group heterogeneity was observed in subgroup analyses, confirming that regorafenib's benefit on progression-free survival was stable across different bone sarcoma types. Common regorafenib-related AEs included hand-foot skin reaction, hypertension, fatigue, and diarrhea. Grade 3-5 events were mostly hypertension and pain, generally manageable with dose modifications. Safety results were also consistent across studies, showing zero or near-zero heterogeneity (I² = 0%) and no significant subgroup differences, indicating a homogeneous safety profile across sarcoma subtypes.

Conclusion: Regorafenib significantly improves progression-free survival in bone sarcomas across multiple subtypes, with a manageable toxicity profile. These results support its use as a novel therapy and highlight the need for future trials focused on optimizing dosing and patient selection. .

目的:骨肉瘤是一种罕见的侵袭性肿瘤,预后差,晚期系统选择有限。本系统综述和荟萃分析通过随机对照试验(rct)评估了其在骨肉瘤中的疗效和安全性。方法:检索PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science,检索2012年9月27日至2024年10月14日发表的rct。剔除重复项后,筛选了350例记录,其中5例rct符合纳入标准。主要结局是无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和不良事件(ae)。使用Cochrane风险偏倚2 (RoB2)工具评估研究质量。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析,采用I²统计量评估异质性。所有分析均使用R 4.3.1版本进行。结果:剔除重复后共筛选出350条记录,其中根据标题和摘要排除339条。11篇全文文章被评估为合格,6篇因不符合RCT标准而被排除,最终纳入5篇RCT。大多数在基线时有转移性疾病。Regorafenib显著改善了PFS (MD = 9.69周;95% CI: 4.54-14.84; I²= 0%),但总体生存(OS)获益无统计学意义(MD = 0.85周;95% CI: -36.33 - 38.02; I²= 0%)。这些发现在研究和组织学亚型中是一致的。所有合并分析均显示为零或接近零异质性(I²= 0%),表明试验之间的治疗效果高度一致。在亚组分析中没有观察到显著的组间异质性,证实瑞非尼对不同骨肉瘤类型的无进展生存期的益处是稳定的。常见的瑞非尼相关不良反应包括手足皮肤反应、高血压、疲劳和腹泻。3-5级事件主要是高血压和疼痛,通常通过剂量调整可以控制。安全性结果在所有研究中也是一致的,显示零或接近零的异质性(I²= 0%),没有显著的亚组差异,表明不同肉瘤亚型的安全性特征是均匀的。结论:Regorafenib可显著改善多种亚型骨肉瘤的无进展生存期,且毒性可控。这些结果支持其作为一种新疗法的使用,并强调了未来试验的需要,重点是优化剂量和患者选择。
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Regorafenib's Effectiveness and Safety in the Treatment of Bone Sarcoma.","authors":"Mohsen Rahmanian, Sara Khoropanah, Sepehr Hosseinzadeh Moghaddam, Abulfazl Vatankhah, Elaheh Abdi Bastamie, Soheila Roashanzamir, Amir Rahmanian Sharifabad, Reza Ganji","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2025.87671.3969","DOIUrl":"10.22038/ABJS.2025.87671.3969","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Bone sarcomas are rare, aggressive tumors with poor outcomes and limited systemic options in advanced stages. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated its efficacy and safety in bone sarcomas using randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for RCTs published from September 27, 2012, to October 14, 2024. After removing duplicates, 350 records were screened, and five RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool. Meta-analyses were performed with a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was evaluated using I² statistics. All analyses were conducted using R version 4.3.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 350 records were screened after duplicate removal, of which 339 were excluded based on title and abstract. Eleven full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and six were excluded for not meeting RCT criteria, resulting in five RCTs being included. Most had metastatic disease at baseline. Regorafenib significantly improved PFS (MD = 9.69 weeks; 95% CI: 4.54-14.84; I² = 0%), with no statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit (MD = 0.85 weeks; 95% CI: -36.33 to 38.02; I² = 0%). These findings were consistent across studies and histological subtypes. All pooled analyses demonstrated zero or near-zero heterogeneity (I² = 0%), indicating highly consistent treatment effects among trials. No significant between-group heterogeneity was observed in subgroup analyses, confirming that regorafenib's benefit on progression-free survival was stable across different bone sarcoma types. Common regorafenib-related AEs included hand-foot skin reaction, hypertension, fatigue, and diarrhea. Grade 3-5 events were mostly hypertension and pain, generally manageable with dose modifications. Safety results were also consistent across studies, showing zero or near-zero heterogeneity (I² = 0%) and no significant subgroup differences, indicating a homogeneous safety profile across sarcoma subtypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regorafenib significantly improves progression-free survival in bone sarcomas across multiple subtypes, with a manageable toxicity profile. These results support its use as a novel therapy and highlight the need for future trials focused on optimizing dosing and patient selection. .</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"13 12","pages":"776-787"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12777697/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145935623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bone Mineral Density Changes in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence and Parathyroidectomy Outcomes. 1型多发性内分泌瘤的骨密度变化:发病率和甲状旁腺切除术结果的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2025.82946.3775
Vahid Mahdavizadeh, Maryam Emadzadeh, Zahra Mazloum Khorasani

Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in MEN1-related primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), examine the impact of parathyroidectomy (PTX) on bone metabolic outcomes, and compare bone density metrics between sporadic and MEN1-related PHPT.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the guidelines for Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies (MOOSE). We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus up to June 2024, subsequently screening the articles to identify relevant research. Studies focusing on bone mineral density (BMD), T and Z-scores in patients with MEN1-related conditions were included. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models.

Results: From the initial 2,563 articles, 15 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in patients with MEN1-related PHPT was 45.2% (95% CI: 39.1-51.4%; I2: 16.7%) and 53.3% (95% CI: 44.4-62.0%; I2: 36.15%), respectively. PTX showed no significant impact on BMD in MEN1-related PHPT patients at the lumbar spine (mean difference: -0.054; P-value = 0.092; I2: 0.86%) or femoral neck (mean difference: -0.025; P-value = 0.219; I2: 0.47%). Comparisons of bone density metrics showed that MEN1-related PHPT patients had significantly lower Z-scores at the lumbar spine (mean difference: -0.676; P-value < 0.001; I2: 41.86%), total hip (mean difference: -0.629; P < 0.001; I2: 23.4%), and femoral neck (mean difference: -0.516; P < 0.001; I2 = 38.82%) compared to patients with sporadic PHPT.

Conclusion: Patients with MEN1-related PHPT exhibited a high prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis, along with lower BMD metrics compared to those with sporadic PHPT. PTX was not associated with significant changes in BMD among MEN1-related PHPT patients.

目的:本研究旨在分析men1相关原发性甲状旁腺功能减退症(PHPT)中骨质减少和骨质疏松的患病率,检查甲状旁腺切除术(PTX)对骨代谢结果的影响,并比较散发性和men1相关PHPT之间的骨密度指标。方法:按照《观察性研究的荟萃分析和系统评价》(MOOSE)指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。我们检索了PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus,检索时间截止到2024年6月,随后筛选文章以确定相关研究。研究集中于men1相关疾病患者的骨密度(BMD)、T和z评分。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析。结果:从最初的2563篇文章中,有15项研究被纳入meta分析。men1相关PHPT患者骨质疏松和骨质减少的总患病率为45.2% (95% CI: 39.1-51.4%;I2: 16.7%)和53.3% (95% CI: 44.4-62.0%;2: 36.15%)。PTX对men1相关PHPT患者腰椎骨密度无显著影响(平均差异:-0.054;p值= 0.092;I2: 0.86%)或股骨颈(平均差异:-0.025;p值= 0.219;I2: 0.47%)。骨密度指标比较显示,与men1相关的PHPT患者腰椎z -评分显著降低(平均差值:-0.676;p值< 0.001;I2: 41.86%)、全髋部(平均差值:-0.629;P < 0.001;I2: 23.4%),股骨颈(平均差值:-0.516;P < 0.001;I2 = 38.82%)与散发性PHPT患者相比。结论:与散发性PHPT患者相比,men1相关PHPT患者表现出骨质减少和骨质疏松症的高患病率,同时BMD指标较低。在men1相关的PHPT患者中,PTX与BMD的显著变化无关。
{"title":"Bone Mineral Density Changes in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence and Parathyroidectomy Outcomes.","authors":"Vahid Mahdavizadeh, Maryam Emadzadeh, Zahra Mazloum Khorasani","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2025.82946.3775","DOIUrl":"10.22038/ABJS.2025.82946.3775","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in MEN1-related primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), examine the impact of parathyroidectomy (PTX) on bone metabolic outcomes, and compare bone density metrics between sporadic and MEN1-related PHPT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the guidelines for Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies (MOOSE). We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus up to June 2024, subsequently screening the articles to identify relevant research. Studies focusing on bone mineral density (BMD), T and Z-scores in patients with MEN1-related conditions were included. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the initial 2,563 articles, 15 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in patients with MEN1-related PHPT was 45.2% (95% CI: 39.1-51.4%; I2: 16.7%) and 53.3% (95% CI: 44.4-62.0%; I2: 36.15%), respectively. PTX showed no significant impact on BMD in MEN1-related PHPT patients at the lumbar spine (mean difference: -0.054; P-value = 0.092; I2: 0.86%) or femoral neck (mean difference: -0.025; P-value = 0.219; I2: 0.47%). Comparisons of bone density metrics showed that MEN1-related PHPT patients had significantly lower Z-scores at the lumbar spine (mean difference: -0.676; P-value < 0.001; I2: 41.86%), total hip (mean difference: -0.629; P < 0.001; I2: 23.4%), and femoral neck (mean difference: -0.516; P < 0.001; I2 = 38.82%) compared to patients with sporadic PHPT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with MEN1-related PHPT exhibited a high prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis, along with lower BMD metrics compared to those with sporadic PHPT. PTX was not associated with significant changes in BMD among MEN1-related PHPT patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"13 3","pages":"125-133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938364/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143732329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Minimally Invasive vs Open First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Cheilectomy: Radiographic Outcomes and Early Complications. 微创与开放式第一跖趾关节颧骨切除术:影像学结果和早期并发症。
IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.81570.3715
Noopur Ranganathan, Marium Raza, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani, Christopher P Miller

Objectives: Current literature on surgical techniques has evaluated minimally invasive surgery (MIS) cheilectomy and its efficacy in comparison to the open technique. However, no study to date has evaluated MIS-Moberg in relation to open and MIS cheilectomy. This study assessed radiological outcomes and early healing and complications of patients who underwent open, MIS, and MIS-Moberg cheilectomies.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort review of 134 patients who underwent first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) cheilectomy at an academic medical center between 2015 and 2024. Success of cheilectomy was determined radiographically. Postoperative complications were identified through medical record review.

Results: 73 open and 61 MIS cheilectomies were performed on 134 patients with a primary diagnosis of hallux rigidus. The pre-operative versus post-operative differences in dorsal cortical length (3.7±1.4) and sagittal articular P1 angle (7.3±4.8) were found to be statistically significant (P<0.05) for the MIS-Moberg group. Ten patients in the open cheilectomy were found to have dorsiflexion and plantarflexion stiffness compared to zero patients in the MIS and MIS-Moberg groups (P<0.01).

Conclusion: We showed a significantly greater rate of plantar- and dorsiflexion stiffness in open surgeries compared to MIS and MIS-Moberg. No other differences in healing rates or radiologic outcomes were observed. Based on preliminary results, the MIS-Moberg can successfully alter the radiographic alignment of the great toe and does not increase complications as compared to open or MIS cheilectomy alone.

目的:目前关于外科技术的文献已经评估了微创手术(MIS)颧骨切除术及其与开放技术的比较效果。然而,迄今为止还没有研究评估MIS- moberg与开放式和MIS颧骨切除术的关系。本研究评估了接受开放、MIS和MIS- moberg颧骨切除术患者的放射学结果、早期愈合和并发症。方法:我们对2015年至2024年间在某学术医疗中心接受首次跖趾趾(MTP)颧骨切除术的134例患者进行了回顾性队列分析。颧骨切除术的成功是由x线片决定的。通过病历检查确定术后并发症。结果:对134例以拇僵直为首发诊断的患者进行了73例开放式和61例MIS双趾切除术。术前与术后背皮质长度(3.7±1.4)和矢状关节P1角(7.3±4.8)的差异具有统计学意义(结论:与MIS和MIS- moberg相比,我们发现开放手术的足底和背屈刚度率显著高于开放手术。在治愈率或放射学结果方面没有观察到其他差异。根据初步结果,MIS- moberg可以成功地改变大脚趾的x线线,并且与单纯的切开或MIS截骨相比,不会增加并发症。
{"title":"Minimally Invasive vs Open First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Cheilectomy: Radiographic Outcomes and Early Complications.","authors":"Noopur Ranganathan, Marium Raza, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani, Christopher P Miller","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2024.81570.3715","DOIUrl":"10.22038/ABJS.2024.81570.3715","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Current literature on surgical techniques has evaluated minimally invasive surgery (MIS) cheilectomy and its efficacy in comparison to the open technique. However, no study to date has evaluated MIS-Moberg in relation to open and MIS cheilectomy. This study assessed radiological outcomes and early healing and complications of patients who underwent open, MIS, and MIS-Moberg cheilectomies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort review of 134 patients who underwent first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) cheilectomy at an academic medical center between 2015 and 2024. Success of cheilectomy was determined radiographically. Postoperative complications were identified through medical record review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>73 open and 61 MIS cheilectomies were performed on 134 patients with a primary diagnosis of hallux rigidus. The pre-operative versus post-operative differences in dorsal cortical length (3.7±1.4) and sagittal articular P1 angle (7.3±4.8) were found to be statistically significant (P<0.05) for the MIS-Moberg group. Ten patients in the open cheilectomy were found to have dorsiflexion and plantarflexion stiffness compared to zero patients in the MIS and MIS-Moberg groups (P<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We showed a significantly greater rate of plantar- and dorsiflexion stiffness in open surgeries compared to MIS and MIS-Moberg. No other differences in healing rates or radiologic outcomes were observed. Based on preliminary results, the MIS-Moberg can successfully alter the radiographic alignment of the great toe and does not increase complications as compared to open or MIS cheilectomy alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"13 3","pages":"152-156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938365/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143732347","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1