Byron E Chalidis, Dimitrios Kitridis, Ioannis Gigis, Panagiotis K Givissis
Background A variety of internal and external fixation techniques have been described for the treatment of Rolando fractures, but the optimal fixation method has not been clearly defined. Purpose The aim of the study was to describe the results and the long-term functional outcome of the application, under local anesthesia, of an external fixation system for the treatment of Rolando fractures. Patients and Methods In total, 22 consecutive patients (16 men) underwent surgical treatment for Rolando fractures by using two pairs of pins external fixator. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia (Xylocaine 2%) and an image intensifier. Patients were evaluated at regular intervals postoperatively and contacted by phone for long-term follow-up. Functional outcome was assessed using the validated Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) tool. Results The mean age was 39.8 ± 14.2 years. The mean time from injury to surgery was 4.1 ± 2 days. The mean operative time was 16.3 ± 2.6 minutes. All fractures were healed and no loss of fracture reduction was observed postoperatively. One patient developed wound erythema at the proximal pins, without requiring early removal of the implant, and another one experienced temporary numbness at the distribution of the superficial radial nerve. In total, 20 out of the 22 patients who were available for long-term follow-up did not report any complaints and could perform the daily activities without restriction. The average follow-up was 6.5 ± 1.2 years, and the mean Quick DASH score was 1.8 ± 3. Conclusion The two pairs of pins external fixator is a valuable option for the treatment of Rolando fractures and can be easily, quickly, and effectively applied under local anesthesia.
{"title":"Trapeziometacarpal External Fixation under Local Anesthesia for the Treatment of Comminuted Intra-Articular Thumb Metacarpal Fractures: Evaluation of Clinical Results and Long-Term Patient Satisfaction.","authors":"Byron E Chalidis, Dimitrios Kitridis, Ioannis Gigis, Panagiotis K Givissis","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1749146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1749146","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> A variety of internal and external fixation techniques have been described for the treatment of Rolando fractures, but the optimal fixation method has not been clearly defined. <b>Purpose</b> The aim of the study was to describe the results and the long-term functional outcome of the application, under local anesthesia, of an external fixation system for the treatment of Rolando fractures. <b>Patients and Methods</b> In total, 22 consecutive patients (16 men) underwent surgical treatment for Rolando fractures by using two pairs of pins external fixator. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia (Xylocaine 2%) and an image intensifier. Patients were evaluated at regular intervals postoperatively and contacted by phone for long-term follow-up. Functional outcome was assessed using the validated Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) tool. <b>Results</b> The mean age was 39.8 ± 14.2 years. The mean time from injury to surgery was 4.1 ± 2 days. The mean operative time was 16.3 ± 2.6 minutes. All fractures were healed and no loss of fracture reduction was observed postoperatively. One patient developed wound erythema at the proximal pins, without requiring early removal of the implant, and another one experienced temporary numbness at the distribution of the superficial radial nerve. In total, 20 out of the 22 patients who were available for long-term follow-up did not report any complaints and could perform the daily activities without restriction. The average follow-up was 6.5 ± 1.2 years, and the mean Quick DASH score was 1.8 ± 3. <b>Conclusion</b> The two pairs of pins external fixator is a valuable option for the treatment of Rolando fractures and can be easily, quickly, and effectively applied under local anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":46757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wrist Surgery","volume":"12 4","pages":"301-305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411102/pdf/10-1055-s-0042-1749146.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9976190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-28eCollection Date: 2023-08-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771204
Toshiyasu Nakamura
{"title":"The Journal of Wrist Surgery Now Has Its First Impact Factor.","authors":"Toshiyasu Nakamura","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771204","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1771204","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wrist Surgery","volume":"12 4","pages":"287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411221/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10327503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-28eCollection Date: 2024-04-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771338
Daniel Tordjman, Mohammad Younis, Shai Factor, Gilad Eisenberg, Franck Atlan, Jessica McBeth, Tamir Pritsch, Yishai Rosenblatt
Background Open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fractures is one of the most common procedures performed in wrist surgery. The use of volar locking plate has gained increasing interest in the past decade. Epiphyseal fixation can be done either with locking screws or smooth locking pegs, with no evidence supporting the use of one rather than the other. Purpose The aim of this study is to compare the stability of distal radius fixation by volar locking plate using locking screws or smooth locking pegs. Methods Adult patients with A2-A3 AO fractures treated with a volar plate with locking screws only or smooth locking pegs only were retrospectively included. Radiographic assessment was performed to evaluate extra-articular parameters in the intraoperative postreduction and fixation period and after bony healing. Forty-seven distal radius fractures were included. Results Twenty-four fractures had fixation with locking screws and 23 had fixation with smooth locking pegs. For both groups, all radiographic parameters measured showed a statistically significant difference between the intraoperative postreduction and fixation period and the remote postoperative period after union of the fracture ( p < 0.05) attesting a slight loss of reduction. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences between the groups in radiographic extra-articular parameters. Conclusion This clinical study shows that there is no difference in stability fixation between locking screws or smooth locking pegs in A2-A3 distal radius fractures. Clinical Relevance The use of smooth locking pegs only for epiphyseal fixation appears to be safe in volar plating of A2-A3 distal radius fractures in adult patients and could be an alternative to locking screws. More clinical data are needed to confirm these results. Level of Evidence Level III; retrospective comparative study.
{"title":"Volar Locking Plating of Extra-articular Distal Radius Fracture: A Retrospective Clinical Study Comparing Locking Screws versus Smooth Locking Pegs.","authors":"Daniel Tordjman, Mohammad Younis, Shai Factor, Gilad Eisenberg, Franck Atlan, Jessica McBeth, Tamir Pritsch, Yishai Rosenblatt","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771338","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1771338","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fractures is one of the most common procedures performed in wrist surgery. The use of volar locking plate has gained increasing interest in the past decade. Epiphyseal fixation can be done either with locking screws or smooth locking pegs, with no evidence supporting the use of one rather than the other. <b>Purpose</b> The aim of this study is to compare the stability of distal radius fixation by volar locking plate using locking screws or smooth locking pegs. <b>Methods</b> Adult patients with A2-A3 AO fractures treated with a volar plate with locking screws only or smooth locking pegs only were retrospectively included. Radiographic assessment was performed to evaluate extra-articular parameters in the intraoperative postreduction and fixation period and after bony healing. Forty-seven distal radius fractures were included. <b>Results</b> Twenty-four fractures had fixation with locking screws and 23 had fixation with smooth locking pegs. For both groups, all radiographic parameters measured showed a statistically significant difference between the intraoperative postreduction and fixation period and the remote postoperative period after union of the fracture ( <i>p</i> < 0.05) attesting a slight loss of reduction. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences between the groups in radiographic extra-articular parameters. <b>Conclusion</b> This clinical study shows that there is no difference in stability fixation between locking screws or smooth locking pegs in A2-A3 distal radius fractures. <b>Clinical Relevance</b> The use of smooth locking pegs only for epiphyseal fixation appears to be safe in volar plating of A2-A3 distal radius fractures in adult patients and could be an alternative to locking screws. More clinical data are needed to confirm these results. <b>Level of Evidence</b> Level III; retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":46757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wrist Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":"151-157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10948244/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41711060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-24eCollection Date: 2024-02-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770077
Jeff Ecker, Karolina Pavleski, Courtney Andrijich
Background The integrity of the foveal insertion of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) is currently assessed by inference using the hook test. Using dry arthroscopic techniques, the primary author observed that many patients with painful distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability and a positive hook test had an intact foveal insertion. This study was performed to determine whether a positive hook test is a reliable index of a tear of the foveal insertion. Technique The hook test is performed using a probe to elevate the TFCC off the ulna head toward the articular surface of the lunate. In this study, the hook test was considered positive if the TFCC could be elevated to bridge more than 80% of the space between the TFCC and the articular surface of the lunate. Patients and Methods A retrospective study was performed using the medical records and arthroscopic videos of 113 patients who had clinical signs of DRUJ instability and underwent arthroscopic surgery performed by the primary author in 2020. It was documented whether the hook test was positive or negative, whether the foveal insertion was intact, abnormal or absent, and whether there were peripheral (dorsal or volar) tears of the TFCC. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using arthroscopic findings as the reference standard. Results The sensitivity of the hook test was found to be 100%, and the specificity was 7.0%. The positive predictive value for foveal pathology was found to be 12.3% and the negative predictive value 100%. The diagnostic accuracy of the hook test in determining the presence of foveal tears was found to be 17.7%. The diagnostic accuracy of the hook test in determining the presence of a TFCC abnormality was 99.1%. Conclusions A positive hook test is indicative of a tear of the TFCC, but it is not anatomically specific for a tear of the foveal insertion. To reliably assess the foveal insertion, it must be visualized and probed using dry arthroscopic techniques.
{"title":"The Hook Test Is Not Pathognomonic for Foveal Detachment of the Triangular Fibrocartilage.","authors":"Jeff Ecker, Karolina Pavleski, Courtney Andrijich","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1770077","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1770077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> The integrity of the foveal insertion of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) is currently assessed by inference using the hook test. Using dry arthroscopic techniques, the primary author observed that many patients with painful distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability and a positive hook test had an intact foveal insertion. This study was performed to determine whether a positive hook test is a reliable index of a tear of the foveal insertion. <b>Technique</b> The hook test is performed using a probe to elevate the TFCC off the ulna head toward the articular surface of the lunate. In this study, the hook test was considered positive if the TFCC could be elevated to bridge more than 80% of the space between the TFCC and the articular surface of the lunate. <b>Patients and Methods</b> A retrospective study was performed using the medical records and arthroscopic videos of 113 patients who had clinical signs of DRUJ instability and underwent arthroscopic surgery performed by the primary author in 2020. It was documented whether the hook test was positive or negative, whether the foveal insertion was intact, abnormal or absent, and whether there were peripheral (dorsal or volar) tears of the TFCC. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using arthroscopic findings as the reference standard. <b>Results</b> The sensitivity of the hook test was found to be 100%, and the specificity was 7.0%. The positive predictive value for foveal pathology was found to be 12.3% and the negative predictive value 100%. The diagnostic accuracy of the hook test in determining the presence of foveal tears was found to be 17.7%. The diagnostic accuracy of the hook test in determining the presence of a TFCC abnormality was 99.1%. <b>Conclusions</b> A positive hook test is indicative of a tear of the TFCC, but it is not anatomically specific for a tear of the foveal insertion. To reliably assess the foveal insertion, it must be visualized and probed using dry arthroscopic techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":46757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wrist Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":"44-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10803151/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"57981349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-05eCollection Date: 2023-10-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1769925
Henriëtte A W Meijer, Miryam C Obdeijn, Justin van Loon, Stein B M van den Heuvel, Lianne C van den Brink, Marlies P Schijven, J Carel Goslings, Tim Schepers
Background Exercises are frequently prescribed to regain function; yet there is no consensus on a standardized protocol, and adherence is low. Smart technology innovations, such as mobile applications, may be useful to provide home-based patient support in rehabilitation after distal radius fractures. Purposes Our purpose was to establish the potential of digital innovations for support and monitoring of patients and treatment adherence in rehabilitation programs, and additionally, to compare the current practice among physiotherapists to the various wrist exercise regimens and their effectiveness as described in the literature. Methods Standard practice, including the use of support tools for treatment adherence, was evaluated using a nationwide survey. Then, scientific databases were searched using "distal radius fracture" and "physiotherapy" or "exercise therapy," and related search terms, up until 23 March 2023. Results of the survey and literature review were compared. Results The survey was completed by 92 therapists. Nonstandardized support tools were used by 81.6% of respondents; 53.2% used some form of technology, including taking photos on the patients' smartphone for home reference. In the literature review, 23 studies were included, of which five described an exercise protocol. Treatment adherence was not reported in any of the included studies. Two studies described the use of smart technology or support tools. Conclusions There is no consensus on a standardized exercise protocol for rehabilitation after distal radius fractures, neither from a systematic literature search nor from a nationwide survey. Smart technology may facilitate monitoring of patients and exercise adherence, hereby supporting self-efficacy and improving adherence and outcomes.
{"title":"Rehabilitation after Distal Radius Fractures: Opportunities for Improvement.","authors":"Henriëtte A W Meijer, Miryam C Obdeijn, Justin van Loon, Stein B M van den Heuvel, Lianne C van den Brink, Marlies P Schijven, J Carel Goslings, Tim Schepers","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1769925","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1769925","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Exercises are frequently prescribed to regain function; yet there is no consensus on a standardized protocol, and adherence is low. Smart technology innovations, such as mobile applications, may be useful to provide home-based patient support in rehabilitation after distal radius fractures. <b>Purposes</b> Our purpose was to establish the potential of digital innovations for support and monitoring of patients and treatment adherence in rehabilitation programs, and additionally, to compare the current practice among physiotherapists to the various wrist exercise regimens and their effectiveness as described in the literature. <b>Methods</b> Standard practice, including the use of support tools for treatment adherence, was evaluated using a nationwide survey. Then, scientific databases were searched using \"distal radius fracture\" and \"physiotherapy\" or \"exercise therapy,\" and related search terms, up until 23 March 2023. Results of the survey and literature review were compared. <b>Results</b> The survey was completed by 92 therapists. Nonstandardized support tools were used by 81.6% of respondents; 53.2% used some form of technology, including taking photos on the patients' smartphone for home reference. In the literature review, 23 studies were included, of which five described an exercise protocol. Treatment adherence was not reported in any of the included studies. Two studies described the use of smart technology or support tools. <b>Conclusions</b> There is no consensus on a standardized exercise protocol for rehabilitation after distal radius fractures, neither from a systematic literature search nor from a nationwide survey. Smart technology may facilitate monitoring of patients and exercise adherence, hereby supporting self-efficacy and improving adherence and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wrist Surgery","volume":"12 5","pages":"460-473"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10569825/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41239764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-28eCollection Date: 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770792
Morad Chughtai, Adrienne M Orriols, Supreeya A Saengchote, Jongmin Kim, Thomas W Wright, Paul C Dell, Robert C Matthias
Background Carpal bone tumors are rare in the literature, making it difficult to identify their clinical presentation. Purpose This systematic review analyzes the characteristics of published carpal bone tumor cases to identify the most frequent patterns in diagnoses. Attention is paid to the carpal bone involved and type, and patient demographics was performed to summarize published findings. Methods A systematic review was searched on PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane databases gathering literature on carpal bone tumors. After applying specific criteria, final analysis of the literature yielded 151 patients with 156 carpal bone neoplasms. Results The most common carpal bones involved were the scaphoid (48, 31%), capitate (31, 20%), and hamate (24, 15%). Benign tumors represented the largest majority (133, 85%), followed by metastatic (17, 11%) and primary malignant (7, 5%). The most frequent tumor types were osteoid osteoma (37, 24%), osteoblastoma or giant cell tumor (24, 15%), intraosseous ganglia (21, 13%), and chondroblastoma (14, 9%). Within the metastatic category, most tumors derived from lung carcinoma (10, 59%), followed by renal cell carcinoma (2, 12%). There were three types within the malignant category: chondrosarcoma (3, 43%), hemangioendothelial sarcoma (3, 43%), and osteosarcoma (1, 14%). Conclusion The most frequent carpal bones observed were the scaphoid, capitate, and hamate. Most tumors were benign. The most common tumor types were osteoid osteoma, osteoblastoma, and giant cell tumor. Metastatic carpal tumors were most commonly from lung carcinoma. Chondrosarcoma and hemangioendothelial sarcoma were the most common primary malignancies.
{"title":"Distribution and Characteristics of Carpal Bone Tumors: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Morad Chughtai, Adrienne M Orriols, Supreeya A Saengchote, Jongmin Kim, Thomas W Wright, Paul C Dell, Robert C Matthias","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1770792","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1770792","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Carpal bone tumors are rare in the literature, making it difficult to identify their clinical presentation. <b>Purpose</b> This systematic review analyzes the characteristics of published carpal bone tumor cases to identify the most frequent patterns in diagnoses. Attention is paid to the carpal bone involved and type, and patient demographics was performed to summarize published findings. <b>Methods</b> A systematic review was searched on PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane databases gathering literature on carpal bone tumors. After applying specific criteria, final analysis of the literature yielded 151 patients with 156 carpal bone neoplasms. <b>Results</b> The most common carpal bones involved were the scaphoid (48, 31%), capitate (31, 20%), and hamate (24, 15%). Benign tumors represented the largest majority (133, 85%), followed by metastatic (17, 11%) and primary malignant (7, 5%). The most frequent tumor types were osteoid osteoma (37, 24%), osteoblastoma or giant cell tumor (24, 15%), intraosseous ganglia (21, 13%), and chondroblastoma (14, 9%). Within the metastatic category, most tumors derived from lung carcinoma (10, 59%), followed by renal cell carcinoma (2, 12%). There were three types within the malignant category: chondrosarcoma (3, 43%), hemangioendothelial sarcoma (3, 43%), and osteosarcoma (1, 14%). <b>Conclusion</b> The most frequent carpal bones observed were the scaphoid, capitate, and hamate. Most tumors were benign. The most common tumor types were osteoid osteoma, osteoblastoma, and giant cell tumor. Metastatic carpal tumors were most commonly from lung carcinoma. Chondrosarcoma and hemangioendothelial sarcoma were the most common primary malignancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wrist Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"534-549"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606679/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43587738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Stephen Butler, John Galbraith, Eugene T. H. Ek, Anthony C Berger, David McCombe, S. Tham
Abstract Purpose Fragmented fractures of the proximal pole of the scaphoid that cannot be internally fixed may be salvaged by four-corner arthrodesis or proximal row carpectomy. Replacement of the proximal scaphoid with costal-osteochondral graft (COG) or the medial femoral trochlea (MFT) graft are two alternative solutions for this clinical presentation. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results of the COG and the MFT graft with a minimum 2-year follow-up from a single centre. Methods A retrospective study was performed to investigate the outcome of COG and MFT with a minimum 2 year follow up. Demographic data and clinical assessment including wrist range of motion and grip strength measurements and Oxford Knee score were collected. Patients completed the outcome measures of Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), and a ten-point visual analogue score for pain (VAS). Radiological examination was performed on all wrists at follow-up. Results The visual analogue score, DASH and PRWE were similar between the two groups. There was radiographic evidence of arthritis between the radial styloid and distal scaphoid in all patients that underwent COG but no evidence in those that underwent MFT graft reconstruction. There were different complications in each group. Thirty percent of patients that underwent MFT reconstruction had persistent knee pain at follow up. Conclusion Though there are notable differences in the follow-up period, patients undergoing MFT risk developing knee pain, while those undergoing COG risk radiographic progression of wrist arthritis. Level of Evidence III – Comparative study
{"title":"A Comparison of Rib Osteochondral Graft to Medial Femoral Trochlear Osteocartilaginous Graft for the Salvage of the Fragmented Scaphoid Proximal Pole: A Single-Center Experience with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up","authors":"Stephen Butler, John Galbraith, Eugene T. H. Ek, Anthony C Berger, David McCombe, S. Tham","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1777734","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1777734","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose Fragmented fractures of the proximal pole of the scaphoid that cannot be internally fixed may be salvaged by four-corner arthrodesis or proximal row carpectomy. Replacement of the proximal scaphoid with costal-osteochondral graft (COG) or the medial femoral trochlea (MFT) graft are two alternative solutions for this clinical presentation. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results of the COG and the MFT graft with a minimum 2-year follow-up from a single centre. Methods A retrospective study was performed to investigate the outcome of COG and MFT with a minimum 2 year follow up. Demographic data and clinical assessment including wrist range of motion and grip strength measurements and Oxford Knee score were collected. Patients completed the outcome measures of Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), and a ten-point visual analogue score for pain (VAS). Radiological examination was performed on all wrists at follow-up. Results The visual analogue score, DASH and PRWE were similar between the two groups. There was radiographic evidence of arthritis between the radial styloid and distal scaphoid in all patients that underwent COG but no evidence in those that underwent MFT graft reconstruction. There were different complications in each group. Thirty percent of patients that underwent MFT reconstruction had persistent knee pain at follow up. Conclusion Though there are notable differences in the follow-up period, patients undergoing MFT risk developing knee pain, while those undergoing COG risk radiographic progression of wrist arthritis. Level of Evidence III – Comparative study","PeriodicalId":46757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wrist Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139369264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-07eCollection Date: 2024-06-01DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768925
Love Kapoor, Venkatesan S Kumar, Mohammed T Ansari, Shah A Khan
Purpose Reconstruction and stabilization of ulnar stump after distal ulna tumor resection is still a matter of debate. We present the outcomes of ulnar buttress arthroplasty without stabilization of the ulna stump in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) of the distal ulna. Methods Evaluation of functional outcome was performed using Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 93 (MSTS93) score, Modified Mayo Wrist score (MMWS), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. We also assessed the hand grip strength, range of motion at the wrist, and ulnar carpal translation. Results The study included 8 patients with Campanacci grade 3 GCTB of the distal ulna with a mean follow-up of 35.5 ± 9.1 months. The mean resection length was 7.7 ± 1.3 cm. The mean hand grip strength on the operated side was noted to be 90 ± 0.04% of the contralateral side. Mean MSTS93 score was 27.9 ± 1.25, mean MMWS was 86.9 ± 4.58%, and the mean DASH score was 4.9 ± 1.67, depicting a good to excellent functional outcome with low degree of disability. No radiocarpal instability, ulnar carpal translation, prominence, or instability of the proximal ulnar stump was noted in any patient. Conclusion Reconstruction of the distal radioulnar joint using iliac crest bone graft for ulnar buttress without stabilization of the ulnar stump after resection of the distal ulna is an effective reconstruction option with good functional outcome and preservation of good hand grip strength. Level of Evidence Level IV, Therapeutic study.
{"title":"Ulnar Buttress Arthroplasty without Ulnar Stump Stabilization for Giant Cell Tumor of Distal Ulna.","authors":"Love Kapoor, Venkatesan S Kumar, Mohammed T Ansari, Shah A Khan","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1768925","DOIUrl":"10.1055/s-0043-1768925","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> Reconstruction and stabilization of ulnar stump after distal ulna tumor resection is still a matter of debate. We present the outcomes of ulnar buttress arthroplasty without stabilization of the ulna stump in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) of the distal ulna. <b>Methods</b> Evaluation of functional outcome was performed using Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 93 (MSTS93) score, Modified Mayo Wrist score (MMWS), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. We also assessed the hand grip strength, range of motion at the wrist, and ulnar carpal translation. <b>Results</b> The study included 8 patients with Campanacci grade 3 GCTB of the distal ulna with a mean follow-up of 35.5 ± 9.1 months. The mean resection length was 7.7 ± 1.3 cm. The mean hand grip strength on the operated side was noted to be 90 ± 0.04% of the contralateral side. Mean MSTS93 score was 27.9 ± 1.25, mean MMWS was 86.9 ± 4.58%, and the mean DASH score was 4.9 ± 1.67, depicting a good to excellent functional outcome with low degree of disability. No radiocarpal instability, ulnar carpal translation, prominence, or instability of the proximal ulnar stump was noted in any patient. <b>Conclusion</b> Reconstruction of the distal radioulnar joint using iliac crest bone graft for ulnar buttress without stabilization of the ulnar stump after resection of the distal ulna is an effective reconstruction option with good functional outcome and preservation of good hand grip strength. <b>Level of Evidence</b> Level IV, Therapeutic study.</p>","PeriodicalId":46757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wrist Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":"215-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129884/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41620655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. M. Choudhury, Sandip Singh Saggi, Sze-Ryn Chung, Robert T. J. Yap, D. Chia, Jackson K. H. Jiang, Andrew Yuan Hui Chin
Abstract Galeazzi fracture-dislocations result from severe trauma and can lead to loss of function of the wrist and forearm if not treated appropriately. To avoid such disasters, meticulous surgical management of the injury is necessary. The current literature talks about symptomatic distal radioulnar joint injuries in Galeazzi fracture-dislocations and the various approaches to managing instability. However, unfortunately, there is a dearth of data on the true incidence of injury to the triangular fibrocartilage in the backdrop of the severity of the mechanism of Galeazzi fractures and the damage it may cause as direct inspection of the triangular fibrocartilage complex is not done routinely as a part of management of such cases. We conducted a retrospective review of six consecutive patients with Galeazzi fracture-dislocations. Wrist arthroscopy was performed in these cases, which revealed complex tears of the triangular fibrocartilage complex involving large segments of the ligament and always involving the dorsal periphery. All tears followed the same pattern of disruption of the attachments of two sides of the triangular fibrocartilage complex. We believe our findings will pave the path to further prospective studies in understanding the degree of damage in the triangular fibrocartilage in such devastating injuries and the need for meticulous arthroscopic repair.
{"title":"Arthroscopic Examination of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex in Galeazzi Injuries: Revisiting a Complex Injury","authors":"M. M. Choudhury, Sandip Singh Saggi, Sze-Ryn Chung, Robert T. J. Yap, D. Chia, Jackson K. H. Jiang, Andrew Yuan Hui Chin","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1776002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1776002","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Galeazzi fracture-dislocations result from severe trauma and can lead to loss of function of the wrist and forearm if not treated appropriately. To avoid such disasters, meticulous surgical management of the injury is necessary. The current literature talks about symptomatic distal radioulnar joint injuries in Galeazzi fracture-dislocations and the various approaches to managing instability. However, unfortunately, there is a dearth of data on the true incidence of injury to the triangular fibrocartilage in the backdrop of the severity of the mechanism of Galeazzi fractures and the damage it may cause as direct inspection of the triangular fibrocartilage complex is not done routinely as a part of management of such cases. We conducted a retrospective review of six consecutive patients with Galeazzi fracture-dislocations. Wrist arthroscopy was performed in these cases, which revealed complex tears of the triangular fibrocartilage complex involving large segments of the ligament and always involving the dorsal periphery. All tears followed the same pattern of disruption of the attachments of two sides of the triangular fibrocartilage complex. We believe our findings will pave the path to further prospective studies in understanding the degree of damage in the triangular fibrocartilage in such devastating injuries and the need for meticulous arthroscopic repair.","PeriodicalId":46757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wrist Surgery","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139370755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract Ulnar-sided wrist pain can be caused by a number of problems, including ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) and triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injury. Multiple studies have described the diagnostic criteria for UIS and TFCC injuries, and excellent surgical outcomes have been reported for each condition. Few studies have examined the extent to which the two independent conditions cooccur, and little is known about their relationship. Based on theories in the literature and clinical experience, we propose the possibility of TFCC injury as the cause and result of UIS in this review.
{"title":"Ulnar Impaction Syndrome and TFCC Injury: Their Relationship and Management","authors":"Jin-Hyung Im, Jin-Woo Lee, Joo-Yup Lee","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1776759","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1776759","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Ulnar-sided wrist pain can be caused by a number of problems, including ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) and triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injury. Multiple studies have described the diagnostic criteria for UIS and TFCC injuries, and excellent surgical outcomes have been reported for each condition. Few studies have examined the extent to which the two independent conditions cooccur, and little is known about their relationship. Based on theories in the literature and clinical experience, we propose the possibility of TFCC injury as the cause and result of UIS in this review.","PeriodicalId":46757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wrist Surgery","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139370825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}