首页 > 最新文献

Philosophy of the Social Sciences最新文献

英文 中文
Do We Have to Choose Between Different Concepts of Social Structure? A Comparative Analysis of Approaches and Ideas From Nigel Pleasants, Douglas V. Porpora, and David Easton 我们必须在不同的社会结构概念之间做出选择吗?Nigel Pleasants、Douglas V. Porpora 和 David Easton 的方法和观点比较分析
IF 1.2 1区 哲学 Q4 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI: 10.1177/00483931241280716
Mikael Rundqvist
This study of three different approaches to social structure finds Pleasants’s ideas for the use of different concepts of social structure intriguing but based on an untenable view about the possibility to discern an empirical modality. Porpora’s approach is based on the idea that the relational concept of social structure cannot be bypassed, ontologically speaking. Easton’s idea is to apply the two relational concepts of higher-order and lower-order structure. Relational structures are also salient in the specific scholarly debate studied, which strengthens the idea that it is this concept of social structure that we primarily should focus on.
通过对三种不同的社会结构研究方法的研究,我们发现 Pleasants 关于使用不同的社会结构概念的观点很有启发性,但这种观点是建立在一种站不住脚的观点基础之上的,即无法辨别出一种经验模式。Porpora 的方法基于这样一种观点,即从本体论上讲,社会结构的关系概念是无法绕过的。伊斯顿的想法是应用高阶结构和低阶结构这两个关系概念。在所研究的具体学术争论中,关系结构也很突出,这就加强了我们主要应关注这一社会结构概念的观点。
{"title":"Do We Have to Choose Between Different Concepts of Social Structure? A Comparative Analysis of Approaches and Ideas From Nigel Pleasants, Douglas V. Porpora, and David Easton","authors":"Mikael Rundqvist","doi":"10.1177/00483931241280716","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00483931241280716","url":null,"abstract":"This study of three different approaches to social structure finds Pleasants’s ideas for the use of different concepts of social structure intriguing but based on an untenable view about the possibility to discern an empirical modality. Porpora’s approach is based on the idea that the relational concept of social structure cannot be bypassed, ontologically speaking. Easton’s idea is to apply the two relational concepts of higher-order and lower-order structure. Relational structures are also salient in the specific scholarly debate studied, which strengthens the idea that it is this concept of social structure that we primarily should focus on.","PeriodicalId":46776,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142205806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Costs and Benefits of Diverse Plurality in Economics 经济学多元化的成本与收益
IF 1.2 1区 哲学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI: 10.1177/00483931241255230
Teemu Lari, U. Mäki
The literature on pluralism in economics has focused on the benefits expected from the plurality of theories, methods, and frameworks. This overlooks half of the picture: the costs. Neither have the multifarious costs been systematically analyzed in philosophy of science. We begin rectifying this neglect. We discuss how the benefits of plurality and diversity in science presuppose distinct types of plurality and how various benefit and plurality types are associated with different types of costs. Finally, we ponder how the general mechanisms that give rise to the costs of plurality and diversity are aggravated by various disciplinary characteristics of economics.
关于经济学多元化的文献主要集中在理论、方法和框架多元化的预期收益上。这忽略了一半:成本。科学哲学也没有系统地分析过多元化的代价。我们将着手纠正这种忽视。我们将讨论科学中多元化和多样性的益处是如何以不同类型的多元化为前提的,以及各种益处和多元化类型是如何与不同类型的成本相关联的。最后,我们将思考导致多元化和多样性成本的一般机制是如何因经济学的各种学科特点而加剧的。
{"title":"Costs and Benefits of Diverse Plurality in Economics","authors":"Teemu Lari, U. Mäki","doi":"10.1177/00483931241255230","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00483931241255230","url":null,"abstract":"The literature on pluralism in economics has focused on the benefits expected from the plurality of theories, methods, and frameworks. This overlooks half of the picture: the costs. Neither have the multifarious costs been systematically analyzed in philosophy of science. We begin rectifying this neglect. We discuss how the benefits of plurality and diversity in science presuppose distinct types of plurality and how various benefit and plurality types are associated with different types of costs. Finally, we ponder how the general mechanisms that give rise to the costs of plurality and diversity are aggravated by various disciplinary characteristics of economics.","PeriodicalId":46776,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141271289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review Essay: Limits of the Numerical and the Personalized Measurement Trend in Mental Health Care 评论文章:心理健康护理中数字和个性化测量趋势的局限性
IF 1.2 1区 哲学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI: 10.1177/00483931241255255
Nina S. de Boer, Rosa W. Runhardt
Limits of the Numerical calls for the (re)contextualization of the numerical in the social domain and emphasizes that using quantitative data has epistemic and practical/moral considerations that may not align. In this review essay, we evaluate these claims using a case study, viz. the personalized, clinical experience sampling method (ESM) in mental health care. This case study (1) nuances claims made in Limits of the Numerical regarding the generality and non-contextuality of numerical data, and (2) highlights two additional dimensions to the numerical that have been underexposed in the book (i.e., reactivity and Ballung concepts).
数字的局限性》呼吁对社会领域中的数字进行(重新)语境化,并强调使用定量数据在认识论和实践/道德方面的考虑可能并不一致。在这篇评论文章中,我们通过一个案例研究,即心理健康护理中的个性化临床经验取样法(ESM),来评估这些主张。该案例研究(1)细化了《数字的局限性》一书中关于数字数据的普遍性和非语境性的主张,(2)强调了数字的两个额外维度(即反应性和巴隆概念),而这两个维度在该书中并未得到充分展示。
{"title":"Review Essay: Limits of the Numerical and the Personalized Measurement Trend in Mental Health Care","authors":"Nina S. de Boer, Rosa W. Runhardt","doi":"10.1177/00483931241255255","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00483931241255255","url":null,"abstract":"Limits of the Numerical calls for the (re)contextualization of the numerical in the social domain and emphasizes that using quantitative data has epistemic and practical/moral considerations that may not align. In this review essay, we evaluate these claims using a case study, viz. the personalized, clinical experience sampling method (ESM) in mental health care. This case study (1) nuances claims made in Limits of the Numerical regarding the generality and non-contextuality of numerical data, and (2) highlights two additional dimensions to the numerical that have been underexposed in the book (i.e., reactivity and Ballung concepts).","PeriodicalId":46776,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141194473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Book Review: The Philosophy and Practice of Science 书评:科学的哲学与实践
IF 1.2 1区 哲学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI: 10.1177/00483931241256823
L. Öztig
{"title":"Book Review: The Philosophy and Practice of Science","authors":"L. Öztig","doi":"10.1177/00483931241256823","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00483931241256823","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46776,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141106513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
On Epistemic Extractivism and the Ethics of Data-Sharing 论认识论萃取与数据共享伦理
IF 1.2 1区 哲学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI: 10.1177/00483931241255253
Karl Landström
In this article I argue that data-sharing risks becoming epistemically extractivist and is a practice sensitive to Linda Martín Alcoff´s challenges for extractivist epistemologies. I situate data-sharing as a socio-epistemic practice that gives rise to ethical and epistemic challenges. I draw on the findings of an institutional ethnography of an international social science research project to identify several ethical and epistemic concerns, including epistemic extractivism. I identify Alcoff’s first and second challenge for extractivist epistemologies in the findings of the empirical investigation and argue that they are important considerations for the ethics and socio-epistemological functioning of data-sharing in social science.
在这篇文章中,我认为数据共享有可能成为认识论上的萃取主义,是一种对琳达-马丁-阿尔科夫(Linda Martín Alcoff)提出的萃取主义认识论挑战敏感的实践。我将数据共享视为一种社会-认识论实践,它带来了伦理和认识论方面的挑战。我利用对一个国际社会科学研究项目进行机构人种学调查的结果,确定了几个伦理和认识论方面的问题,包括认识论上的萃取主义。我从实证调查的结果中发现了阿尔科夫对萃取主义认识论提出的第一和第二项挑战,并认为它们是社会科学数据共享的伦理和社会认识论功能的重要考虑因素。
{"title":"On Epistemic Extractivism and the Ethics of Data-Sharing","authors":"Karl Landström","doi":"10.1177/00483931241255253","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00483931241255253","url":null,"abstract":"In this article I argue that data-sharing risks becoming epistemically extractivist and is a practice sensitive to Linda Martín Alcoff´s challenges for extractivist epistemologies. I situate data-sharing as a socio-epistemic practice that gives rise to ethical and epistemic challenges. I draw on the findings of an institutional ethnography of an international social science research project to identify several ethical and epistemic concerns, including epistemic extractivism. I identify Alcoff’s first and second challenge for extractivist epistemologies in the findings of the empirical investigation and argue that they are important considerations for the ethics and socio-epistemological functioning of data-sharing in social science.","PeriodicalId":46776,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141110475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Stanley Milgram’s Purloined Letter: A Plea for a Normative Interpretation of the “Obedience to Authority” Experiments 斯坦利-米尔格拉姆的私信:呼吁对 "服从权威 "实验进行规范性解释
IF 1.2 1区 哲学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI: 10.1177/00483931241252600
Raphaël Künstler
I argue here that the theoretically central aspect of Stanley Milgram’s “experiments on obedience to authority” continues to elude main current commentators because it does not fit into the current paradigm of Milgram’s studies: the presentation and the justification of a set of rules to the subjects. I argue that taking this fact into account radically changes the interpretation of the subjects’ conduct: they are not submitting to an authority, they are not obeying orders, but they are applying a justified rule. If such is indeed the case, the interpretation of the experiments should not be primarily psychological, but normative.
我在此指出,斯坦利-米尔格拉姆的 "服从权威实验 "在理论上的核心部分仍然没有被当前的主要评论者所发现,因为它不符合米尔格拉姆研究的当前范式:向受试者展示一套规则并证明其合理性。我认为,考虑到这一事实,就会从根本上改变对受试者行为的解释:他们不是服从权威,不是服从命令,而是在应用一种合理的规则。如果情况确实如此,那么对实验的解释就不应该主要是心理学方面的,而应该是规范方面的。
{"title":"Stanley Milgram’s Purloined Letter: A Plea for a Normative Interpretation of the “Obedience to Authority” Experiments","authors":"Raphaël Künstler","doi":"10.1177/00483931241252600","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00483931241252600","url":null,"abstract":"I argue here that the theoretically central aspect of Stanley Milgram’s “experiments on obedience to authority” continues to elude main current commentators because it does not fit into the current paradigm of Milgram’s studies: the presentation and the justification of a set of rules to the subjects. I argue that taking this fact into account radically changes the interpretation of the subjects’ conduct: they are not submitting to an authority, they are not obeying orders, but they are applying a justified rule. If such is indeed the case, the interpretation of the experiments should not be primarily psychological, but normative.","PeriodicalId":46776,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141109304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Instrumentalism in the Social and Moral Sciences 社会科学和道德科学中的工具论
IF 1.2 1区 哲学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI: 10.1177/00483931241256019
Michael Moehler
This article responds to recent criticism regarding the application of consequentialism and rational choice theory in the social and moral sciences. It clarifies the limited scope of the presented criticism and its overly simplistic view of social scientific inquiry that, together, lead to the presentation of an argument that claims more than it warrants. Moreover, I argue that the criticism overlooks one of the most important uses of instrumentalism in moral theory that may be considered the most challenging case for the application of rational choice theory.
本文回应了近期有关在社会科学和道德科学中应用结果论和理性选择理论的批评。文章澄清了所提批评的有限范围及其对社会科学探究的过于简单化的看法,这些因素加在一起,导致所提出的论点超出了其应有的范围。此外,我认为该批评忽视了工具论在道德理论中最重要的用途之一,而这一用途可被视为理性选择理论应用中最具挑战性的案例。
{"title":"Instrumentalism in the Social and Moral Sciences","authors":"Michael Moehler","doi":"10.1177/00483931241256019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00483931241256019","url":null,"abstract":"This article responds to recent criticism regarding the application of consequentialism and rational choice theory in the social and moral sciences. It clarifies the limited scope of the presented criticism and its overly simplistic view of social scientific inquiry that, together, lead to the presentation of an argument that claims more than it warrants. Moreover, I argue that the criticism overlooks one of the most important uses of instrumentalism in moral theory that may be considered the most challenging case for the application of rational choice theory.","PeriodicalId":46776,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141151186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Explanatory Power of Discourse Analysis 话语分析的解释力
IF 1.2 1区 哲学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI: 10.1177/00483931241255229
Corrado Matta
This paper discusses the explanatory power of discourse analysis, an approach to typically considered one of the main qualitative methods for data analysis. Although discourse analysis is typically not used to develop explanatory models, some have claimed that discourse models can causally explain social phenomena, such as institutional change. I analyze a case of institutional change to discuss and provide arguments for two claims. First, discourse analysis cannot generate causal explanations of social phenomena. Secondly, discourse analysis can generate non-causal explanations, specifically constitutive explanations of social phenomena. I conclude the paper by discussing possible implications for social research.
本文讨论了话语分析的解释力,这种方法通常被认为是数据分析的主要定性方法之一。虽然话语分析通常不用于开发解释性模型,但有些人声称话语模型可以因果性地解释社会现象,如制度变迁。我分析了一个制度变迁的案例,对两种说法进行讨论并提供论据。首先,话语分析不能对社会现象做出因果解释。其次,话语分析可以产生非因果解释,特别是对社会现象的构成性解释。最后,我讨论了本文对社会研究的可能影响。
{"title":"The Explanatory Power of Discourse Analysis","authors":"Corrado Matta","doi":"10.1177/00483931241255229","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00483931241255229","url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the explanatory power of discourse analysis, an approach to typically considered one of the main qualitative methods for data analysis. Although discourse analysis is typically not used to develop explanatory models, some have claimed that discourse models can causally explain social phenomena, such as institutional change. I analyze a case of institutional change to discuss and provide arguments for two claims. First, discourse analysis cannot generate causal explanations of social phenomena. Secondly, discourse analysis can generate non-causal explanations, specifically constitutive explanations of social phenomena. I conclude the paper by discussing possible implications for social research.","PeriodicalId":46776,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141122393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Concepts in Context: Ontological Coherence in Political Science Research 语境中的概念:政治学研究中的本体论一致性
IF 1.2 1区 哲学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI: 10.1177/00483931241254514
Moritz S. Graefrath, Marcel Jahn
Political methodologists have long sought to develop standards that can guide political scientists in the process of concept formation. Yet, the methodology literature has struggled to provide satisfactory solutions to the fundamental problem of conceptualization: for any given concept, there are a large number of attributes one could postulate as its defining characteristics, and it is unclear how to adjudicate between different possible definitions. We leverage the fact that the theory within which a concept appears places important restrictions on concept formation: conceptualizations entail ontological claims that need to be consistent with those of the theories in which they appear.
长期以来,政治方法论学者一直在寻求制定能够指导政治科学家进行概念形成的标准。然而,方法论文献一直在努力为概念化的根本问题提供令人满意的解决方案:对于任何给定的概念,人们都可以假定大量属性作为其定义特征,而如何在不同的可能定义之间进行裁决却并不清楚。我们利用了这样一个事实,即一个概念所出现的理论对概念的形成有着重要的限制:概念化包含了本体论的主张,而这些主张必须与它们所出现的理论的主张相一致。
{"title":"Concepts in Context: Ontological Coherence in Political Science Research","authors":"Moritz S. Graefrath, Marcel Jahn","doi":"10.1177/00483931241254514","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00483931241254514","url":null,"abstract":"Political methodologists have long sought to develop standards that can guide political scientists in the process of concept formation. Yet, the methodology literature has struggled to provide satisfactory solutions to the fundamental problem of conceptualization: for any given concept, there are a large number of attributes one could postulate as its defining characteristics, and it is unclear how to adjudicate between different possible definitions. We leverage the fact that the theory within which a concept appears places important restrictions on concept formation: conceptualizations entail ontological claims that need to be consistent with those of the theories in which they appear.","PeriodicalId":46776,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141059391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Book Review: A Way Through the Global Techno-Scientific Culture 书评穿越全球科技文化之路
IF 1.2 1区 哲学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI: 10.1177/00483931241248823
Alcibiades Malapi-Nelson
{"title":"Book Review: A Way Through the Global Techno-Scientific Culture","authors":"Alcibiades Malapi-Nelson","doi":"10.1177/00483931241248823","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00483931241248823","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46776,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140928485","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Philosophy of the Social Sciences
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1