首页 > 最新文献

Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
The First Report of Anatomical Laparoscopic Liver Resection Performed Using ARTISENTIAL 解剖腹腔镜肝切除术的首个报告。
IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-11-02 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70172
Go Shinke, Yutaka Takeda, Yoshifumi Iwagami, Mitsuru Kinoshita, Yoshiro Yukawa, Asami Arita, Kiminori Yanagisawa, Shinsuke Katsuyama, Masayuki Hiraki, Keijiro Sugimura, Masayoshi Yasui, Kohei Murata

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been widely adopted; however, limited instrument mobility remains a challenge. Such technical limitations can be overcome with the novel articulating laparoscopic device ARTISENTIAL, but its use in LLR has not previously been described. Here we report the first anatomical liver resection performed using the ARTISENTIAL device. A 73-year-old man with a segment-3 hepatic mass underwent laparoscopic left hepatectomy, with lymph node sampling. This procedure was performed using ARTISENTIAL. Parenchymal transection was performed using the clamp-crushing technique with ARTISENTIAL. The Glissonian stump was closed with sutures. Compared to robotic systems, ARTISENTIAL provides similar motion benefits, without the associated cost or set-up requirements. ARTISENTIAL is a versatile and cost-effective technique. This case is the first reported anatomical LLR performed using ARTISENTIAL. Our experience suggests that this device can effectively overcome the major limitations of conventional instruments in LLR.

腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)已被广泛采用;然而,有限的仪器移动性仍然是一个挑战。这种技术限制可以克服与新型铰接式腹腔镜装置artiential,但其在LLR的使用以前没有描述。在这里,我们报告了第一例使用artiential装置进行的解剖性肝切除术。73岁男性,肝3节段肿块行腹腔镜左肝切除术,淋巴结取样。这个过程是用artiential软件完成的。采用夹钳破碎技术进行实质横断。用缝合线缝合Glissonian残端。与机器人系统相比,ARTISENTIAL提供了类似的运动优势,没有相关的成本或安装要求。ARTISENTIAL是一种多功能且经济高效的技术。该病例是首次报道使用artiential进行解剖性LLR。我们的经验表明,该装置可以有效地克服传统仪器在LLR中的主要局限性。
{"title":"The First Report of Anatomical Laparoscopic Liver Resection Performed Using ARTISENTIAL","authors":"Go Shinke,&nbsp;Yutaka Takeda,&nbsp;Yoshifumi Iwagami,&nbsp;Mitsuru Kinoshita,&nbsp;Yoshiro Yukawa,&nbsp;Asami Arita,&nbsp;Kiminori Yanagisawa,&nbsp;Shinsuke Katsuyama,&nbsp;Masayuki Hiraki,&nbsp;Keijiro Sugimura,&nbsp;Masayoshi Yasui,&nbsp;Kohei Murata","doi":"10.1111/ases.70172","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ases.70172","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been widely adopted; however, limited instrument mobility remains a challenge. Such technical limitations can be overcome with the novel articulating laparoscopic device ARTISENTIAL, but its use in LLR has not previously been described. Here we report the first anatomical liver resection performed using the ARTISENTIAL device. A 73-year-old man with a segment-3 hepatic mass underwent laparoscopic left hepatectomy, with lymph node sampling. This procedure was performed using ARTISENTIAL. Parenchymal transection was performed using the clamp-crushing technique with ARTISENTIAL. The Glissonian stump was closed with sutures. Compared to robotic systems, ARTISENTIAL provides similar motion benefits, without the associated cost or set-up requirements. ARTISENTIAL is a versatile and cost-effective technique. This case is the first reported anatomical LLR performed using ARTISENTIAL. Our experience suggests that this device can effectively overcome the major limitations of conventional instruments in LLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12580167/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145432797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Short-Term Outcomes of Minimally-Invasive Esophagectomy Compared to Thoracotomy and Transhiatal Approaches in Total Esophagectomy With Pharyngolaryngectomy 微创食管切除术与开胸和经食管入路全食管切除术合并咽喉癌的短期疗效比较。
IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70169
Ryoko Nozaki, Daisuke Kurita, Koshiro Ishiyama, Junya Oguma, Ryota Kakuta, Shota Igaue, Eigo Akimoto, Daichi Utsunomiya, Yasuyuki Seto, Hiroyuki Daiko

Background

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HN) often occur simultaneously. Total esophagectomy with pharyngolaryngectomy (TE-TPL) is a highly invasive surgery associated with significant mortality. In thoracic esophagectomy, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has gained widespread acceptance. This study evaluates the efficacy of MIE in TE-TPL.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent TE-TPL between January 2007 and December 2022 at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Tokyo, Japan. A total of 33 patients were enrolled, with 19 undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE group) and 14 undergoing conventional esophagectomy (Open group).

Results

MIE was associated with a significantly shorter operative time (532 min vs. 687 min, p = 0.028), less intraoperative bleeding (371 mL vs. 840 mL, p < 0.01), shorter hospital stays (21 days vs. 34 days, p < 0.01), and a lower reoperation rate (11% vs. 29%, p = 0.036) compared to the Open group. The 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were not significantly different between the two groups (OS: 47.4% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.72; PFS: 34.0% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.41).

Conclusion

MIE may be a more feasible and efficient option than the conventional approach for TE-TPL.

背景:食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)和头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HN)常同时发生。全食管切除术合并咽喉癌切除术(TE-TPL)是一种高侵入性手术,死亡率高。在胸段食管切除术中,微创食管切除术(MIE)已被广泛接受。本研究评价MIE治疗TE-TPL的疗效。方法:我们回顾性分析了2007年1月至2022年12月在日本东京国立癌症中心医院接受TE-TPL的患者。共纳入33例患者,其中微创食管切除术19例(MIE组),常规食管切除术14例(Open组)。结果:MIE与手术时间显著缩短(532 min vs. 687 min, p = 0.028),术中出血较少(371 mL vs. 840 mL, p)相关。结论:MIE可能是TE-TPL的一种更可行和有效的选择。
{"title":"Short-Term Outcomes of Minimally-Invasive Esophagectomy Compared to Thoracotomy and Transhiatal Approaches in Total Esophagectomy With Pharyngolaryngectomy","authors":"Ryoko Nozaki,&nbsp;Daisuke Kurita,&nbsp;Koshiro Ishiyama,&nbsp;Junya Oguma,&nbsp;Ryota Kakuta,&nbsp;Shota Igaue,&nbsp;Eigo Akimoto,&nbsp;Daichi Utsunomiya,&nbsp;Yasuyuki Seto,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Daiko","doi":"10.1111/ases.70169","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ases.70169","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HN) often occur simultaneously. Total esophagectomy with pharyngolaryngectomy (TE-TPL) is a highly invasive surgery associated with significant mortality. In thoracic esophagectomy, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has gained widespread acceptance. This study evaluates the efficacy of MIE in TE-TPL.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent TE-TPL between January 2007 and December 2022 at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Tokyo, Japan. A total of 33 patients were enrolled, with 19 undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE group) and 14 undergoing conventional esophagectomy (Open group).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>MIE was associated with a significantly shorter operative time (532 min vs. 687 min, <i>p</i> = 0.028), less intraoperative bleeding (371 mL vs. 840 mL, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), shorter hospital stays (21 days vs. 34 days, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), and a lower reoperation rate (11% vs. 29%, <i>p</i> = 0.036) compared to the Open group. The 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were not significantly different between the two groups (OS: 47.4% vs. 50.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.72; PFS: 34.0% vs. 47.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.41).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>MIE may be a more feasible and efficient option than the conventional approach for TE-TPL.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145393989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Butterfly Traction: A New Standardized Approach for Gallbladder Bed Detachment in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy 蝴蝶牵引:腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆囊床脱离的一种新的标准化方法。
IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-10-27 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70171
Daisuke Noguchi, Takahiro Ito, Aoi Hayasaki, Yusuke Iizawa, Takehiro Fujii, Akihiro Tanemura, Yasuhiro Murata, Naohisa Kuriyama, Masashi Kishiwada, Shugo Mizuno

Introduction

Gallbladder bed detachment (GBB-D) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) lacks a standardized technique. We developed butterfly traction (BT) to perform optimal GBB-D. This study evaluates its effectiveness and potential for standardization.

Methods

BT aligns the dissection axis with the surgeon's dominant hand by positioning the gallbladder upright and using a left-sided lateral approach. This improves right-side mobility, enabling horizontal traction and avoiding axis interference. BT has been adopted in all LCs at our institution since July 2023. Among 118 LCs performed from 2019 to 2024, three open conversion cases and 13 bailout cases were excluded. Operative outcomes in the remaining patients were compared between the BT group (n = 50) and the nonstandardized (NS) group (n = 52).

Results

No significant differences were observed in age, gender, comorbidities, or preoperative gallbladder drainage between groups. However, the BT group had more surgeons with ≤ 5 years of experience (52% vs. 29%, p = 0.017). Operative times were comparable (p = 0.363), but bile contamination due to gallbladder perforation during GBB-D was significantly lower in the BT group (4% vs. 17%, p = 0.030), as was blood loss (0 vs. 1 g, p = 0.003). BT was particularly effective in higher difficulty cases (Grade B/C from Tokyo Guidelines 2018), with shorter operative times (95 vs. 116 min, p = 0.095), less blood loss (0 vs. 2 g, p < 0.001), and fewer perforations (6% vs. 24%, p = 0.046).

Conclusions

BT improved surgical outcomes and minimized bile contamination, even when performed by less experienced surgeons. It shows strong potential as a standard technique for GBB-D in LC.

腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中胆囊床脱离(GBB-D)缺乏标准化的技术。我们开发了蝶式牵引(BT)来实现最佳的GBB-D。本研究评估其有效性和标准化潜力。方法:BT通过使胆囊直立并采用左侧外侧入路,使夹层轴与外科医生的惯用手对齐。这提高了右侧的机动性,使水平牵引和避免轴干扰。自2023年7月起,我们机构的所有lc都采用了BT。在2019年至2024年执行的118个LCs中,排除了3个公开转换案例和13个救助案例。将其余患者的手术结果与BT组(n = 50)和非标准化(NS)组(n = 52)进行比较。结果:两组患者在年龄、性别、合并症、术前胆囊引流等方面无显著差异。而BT组≤5年经验的外科医生较多(52% vs. 29%, p = 0.017)。手术时间比较(p = 0.363),但BT组在GBB-D期间因胆囊穿孔引起的胆汁污染显著降低(4%比17%,p = 0.030),出血量也显著降低(0比1 g, p = 0.003)。BT在高难度病例中特别有效(2018年东京指南B/C级),手术时间更短(95对116分钟,p = 0.095),出血量更少(0对2 g, p)。结论:BT改善了手术效果,最大限度地减少了胆汁污染,即使是由经验不足的外科医生实施。它显示出作为LC中gb - d标准技术的强大潜力。
{"title":"Butterfly Traction: A New Standardized Approach for Gallbladder Bed Detachment in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy","authors":"Daisuke Noguchi,&nbsp;Takahiro Ito,&nbsp;Aoi Hayasaki,&nbsp;Yusuke Iizawa,&nbsp;Takehiro Fujii,&nbsp;Akihiro Tanemura,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Murata,&nbsp;Naohisa Kuriyama,&nbsp;Masashi Kishiwada,&nbsp;Shugo Mizuno","doi":"10.1111/ases.70171","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ases.70171","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Gallbladder bed detachment (GBB-D) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) lacks a standardized technique. We developed butterfly traction (BT) to perform optimal GBB-D. This study evaluates its effectiveness and potential for standardization.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>BT aligns the dissection axis with the surgeon's dominant hand by positioning the gallbladder upright and using a left-sided lateral approach. This improves right-side mobility, enabling horizontal traction and avoiding axis interference. BT has been adopted in all LCs at our institution since July 2023. Among 118 LCs performed from 2019 to 2024, three open conversion cases and 13 bailout cases were excluded. Operative outcomes in the remaining patients were compared between the BT group (<i>n</i> = 50) and the nonstandardized (NS) group (<i>n</i> = 52).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>No significant differences were observed in age, gender, comorbidities, or preoperative gallbladder drainage between groups. However, the BT group had more surgeons with ≤ 5 years of experience (52% vs. 29%, <i>p</i> = 0.017). Operative times were comparable (<i>p</i> = 0.363), but bile contamination due to gallbladder perforation during GBB-D was significantly lower in the BT group (4% vs. 17%, <i>p</i> = 0.030), as was blood loss (0 vs. 1 g, <i>p</i> = 0.003). BT was particularly effective in higher difficulty cases (Grade B/C from Tokyo Guidelines 2018), with shorter operative times (95 vs. 116 min, <i>p</i> = 0.095), less blood loss (0 vs. 2 g, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and fewer perforations (6% vs. 24%, <i>p</i> = 0.046).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>BT improved surgical outcomes and minimized bile contamination, even when performed by less experienced surgeons. It shows strong potential as a standard technique for GBB-D in LC.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12558715/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145379364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intraoperative Verbal Communication in Pediatric Single-Incision Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure: A Comprehensive Analysis and Educational Implications 小儿单切口腹腔镜经皮腹腔外缝合术中言语交流:综合分析及教育意义。
IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-10-27 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70170
Masanaga Matsumoto, Yohei Sanmoto, Kouji Masumoto

Introduction

In pediatric surgery, declining case volumes and restrictions on working hours have intensified the need for efficient training strategies. The operating room remains a central educational environment, yet the nature of intraoperative teaching is unclear. We examined the educational role of intraoperative verbal communication and identified opportunities for improvement.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data of unilateral single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure procedures performed between December 2024 and June 2025 with complete audio and video recordings. Verbal statements were transcribed verbatim, classified by type and content, and analyzed for overall distribution, phase-specific frequency, composition of attending-to-operating surgeon communication, and intraoperative debriefing occurrence during the wound closure.

Results

Nineteen cases were included, yielding 7374 statements. The most common content category was General (39.6%), followed by Instrument handling (19.1%), Anatomy (14.9%), and Operation method (14.8%). The proportion for Instrument handling increased to 27.1% during laparoscopic manipulation; that for Private talk rose to 18.5% during wound closure. Communication from attending to operating surgeons was most frequent in the laparoscopic manipulation phase (median, 3.4; interquartile range, 2.6–4.7, per minute), with higher proportions of Commanding (11.8%) and Advising (14.9%) statements. Intraoperative debriefing on the preceding laparoscopic phase occurred in only two cases (10.5%).

Conclusion

Intraoperative communication during single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure demonstrates distinct phase-specific patterns, with heightened directive teaching during the laparoscopic manipulation phase but infrequent reflective debriefing. These findings suggest that systematically incorporating debriefing into the wound closure phase could foster reflective learning, complement real-time coaching, and enhance the overall educational impact of intraoperative experiences.

导言:在儿科外科,下降的病例量和工作时间的限制,加强了对有效的培训策略的需要。手术室仍然是一个中心的教育环境,但术中教学的性质尚不清楚。我们检查了术中语言交流的教育作用,并确定了改进的机会。方法:回顾性分析2024年12月至2025年6月间单侧单切口腹腔镜经皮腹腔外缝合术的资料,并记录完整的录音和录像。将口头陈述逐字转录,按类型和内容分类,并分析其总体分布、阶段特定频率、主刀医师沟通构成以及伤口愈合过程中术中述诉的发生情况。结果:共纳入19例,共计7374例。最常见的内容类别是一般(39.6%),其次是器械处理(19.1%)、解剖(14.9%)和手术方法(14.8%)。腹腔镜操作中使用器械的比例增加到27.1%;在伤口愈合期间,私人谈话的比例上升到18.5%。主治医生与手术医生的沟通在腹腔镜操作阶段最为频繁(中位数为3.4次/分钟,四分位数范围为2.6-4.7次/分钟),其中命令(11.8%)和建议(14.9%)的比例较高。术中只有2例(10.5%)报告了前腹腔镜阶段的情况。结论:单切口腹腔镜经皮腹腔外闭合术中沟通表现出明显的阶段特异性模式,在腹腔镜操作阶段加强指导性教学,但不经常进行反思性汇报。这些研究结果表明,系统地将问询纳入伤口闭合阶段可以促进反思性学习,补充实时指导,并增强术中经验的整体教育影响。
{"title":"Intraoperative Verbal Communication in Pediatric Single-Incision Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure: A Comprehensive Analysis and Educational Implications","authors":"Masanaga Matsumoto,&nbsp;Yohei Sanmoto,&nbsp;Kouji Masumoto","doi":"10.1111/ases.70170","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ases.70170","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In pediatric surgery, declining case volumes and restrictions on working hours have intensified the need for efficient training strategies. The operating room remains a central educational environment, yet the nature of intraoperative teaching is unclear. We examined the educational role of intraoperative verbal communication and identified opportunities for improvement.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We retrospectively analyzed data of unilateral single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure procedures performed between December 2024 and June 2025 with complete audio and video recordings. Verbal statements were transcribed verbatim, classified by type and content, and analyzed for overall distribution, phase-specific frequency, composition of attending-to-operating surgeon communication, and intraoperative debriefing occurrence during the wound closure.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Nineteen cases were included, yielding 7374 statements. The most common content category was General (39.6%), followed by Instrument handling (19.1%), Anatomy (14.9%), and Operation method (14.8%). The proportion for Instrument handling increased to 27.1% during laparoscopic manipulation; that for Private talk rose to 18.5% during wound closure. Communication from attending to operating surgeons was most frequent in the laparoscopic manipulation phase (median, 3.4; interquartile range, 2.6–4.7, per minute), with higher proportions of Commanding (11.8%) and Advising (14.9%) statements. Intraoperative debriefing on the preceding laparoscopic phase occurred in only two cases (10.5%).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Intraoperative communication during single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure demonstrates distinct phase-specific patterns, with heightened directive teaching during the laparoscopic manipulation phase but infrequent reflective debriefing. These findings suggest that systematically incorporating debriefing into the wound closure phase could foster reflective learning, complement real-time coaching, and enhance the overall educational impact of intraoperative experiences.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12558714/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145379474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating the Safety and Recovery Benefits of vNOTES Compared to Laparoscopy in Obese Patients 评估vNOTES与腹腔镜手术相比在肥胖患者中的安全性和康复益处。
IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-10-27 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70165
Ayşe Betül Albayrak Denizli, Eralp Bulutlar, Gizem Boz İzceyhan, Narin Ece Rol, Gizem Berfin Uluutku Bulutlar, Sadık Şahin, Resul Karakuş

Objective

This study aims to compare perioperative outcomes and recovery parameters between vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) in obese patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted including 112 patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 who underwent hysterectomy between June 2022 and May 2025. Fifty-three patients underwent vNOTES and 59 underwent TLH. Demographic data, intraoperative parameters, postoperative recovery metrics, pain scores, and complications were recorded and statistically compared.

Results

No significant differences were found between groups in terms of BMI, uterine volume, or operative time. However, the vNOTES group exhibited significantly lower estimated blood loss (127.73 ± 88.93 mL vs. 300 ± 120 mL; p < 0.0001), shorter time to ambulation (5.86 ± 1.09 h vs. 6.47 ± 1.20 h; p = 0.006), shorter hospital stay (1.47 ± 0.54 days vs. 1.86 ± 0.43 days; p < 0.0001), and quicker return to daily activities (6.56 ± 1.15 vs. 8.01 ± 1.10 days; p < 0.0001). Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the vNOTES group at all measured time points. Complication rates were low in both groups, with no statistically significant difference.

Conclusion

vNOTES appears to be a safe and effective alternative to laparoscopy in obese patients, offering superior outcomes in terms of recovery time, pain, and blood loss. These findings support the broader adoption of vNOTES in high-risk populations, though further prospective studies are warranted.

目的:本研究旨在比较良性子宫切除术的肥胖患者阴道自然腔内内镜手术(vNOTES)和腹腔镜全子宫切除术(TLH)的围手术期疗效和恢复参数。方法:对2022年6月至2025年5月期间接受子宫切除术的112例体重指数(BMI)≥30 kg/m2的患者进行回顾性队列研究。53例患者行vNOTES, 59例行TLH。记录人口统计数据、术中参数、术后恢复指标、疼痛评分和并发症,并进行统计学比较。结果:两组患者在BMI、子宫体积、手术时间等方面均无显著差异。然而,vNOTES组的估计失血量明显降低(127.73±88.93 mL vs 300±120 mL); p结论:vNOTES似乎是一种安全有效的替代腹腔镜手术的肥胖患者,在恢复时间、疼痛和失血量方面提供了更好的结果。这些发现支持在高危人群中更广泛地采用vNOTES,尽管需要进一步的前瞻性研究。
{"title":"Evaluating the Safety and Recovery Benefits of vNOTES Compared to Laparoscopy in Obese Patients","authors":"Ayşe Betül Albayrak Denizli,&nbsp;Eralp Bulutlar,&nbsp;Gizem Boz İzceyhan,&nbsp;Narin Ece Rol,&nbsp;Gizem Berfin Uluutku Bulutlar,&nbsp;Sadık Şahin,&nbsp;Resul Karakuş","doi":"10.1111/ases.70165","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ases.70165","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study aims to compare perioperative outcomes and recovery parameters between vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) in obese patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A retrospective cohort study was conducted including 112 patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> who underwent hysterectomy between June 2022 and May 2025. Fifty-three patients underwent vNOTES and 59 underwent TLH. Demographic data, intraoperative parameters, postoperative recovery metrics, pain scores, and complications were recorded and statistically compared.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>No significant differences were found between groups in terms of BMI, uterine volume, or operative time. However, the vNOTES group exhibited significantly lower estimated blood loss (127.73 ± 88.93 mL vs. 300 ± 120 mL; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), shorter time to ambulation (5.86 ± 1.09 h vs. 6.47 ± 1.20 h; <i>p</i> = 0.006), shorter hospital stay (1.47 ± 0.54 days vs. 1.86 ± 0.43 days; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), and quicker return to daily activities (6.56 ± 1.15 vs. 8.01 ± 1.10 days; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the vNOTES group at all measured time points. Complication rates were low in both groups, with no statistically significant difference.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>vNOTES appears to be a safe and effective alternative to laparoscopy in obese patients, offering superior outcomes in terms of recovery time, pain, and blood loss. These findings support the broader adoption of vNOTES in high-risk populations, though further prospective studies are warranted.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145379381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does Bile Exposure During Surgery Affect the Postoperative Recovery and Complications of Pediatric Patients With Choledochal Cysts Treated by Laparoscopic Surgery? 手术中胆汁暴露是否影响腹腔镜手术治疗小儿胆总管囊肿的术后恢复和并发症?
IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-10-21 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70168
Keisuke Yano, Masakazu Murakami, Shun Onishi, Koshiro Sugita, Toshio Harumatsu, Takafumi Kawano, Tokuro Baba, Masaaki Kuda, Kina Miyoshi, Yoshinori Koga, Jun Kuwabara, Ryuta Masuya, Makoto Hayashida, Kazuhiko Nakame, Shin Shinyama, Kyosuke Tatsuta, Yusuke Yanagi, Ryuichiro Hirose, Takeshi Shono, Misato Migita, Tatsuru Kaji, Mitsuhisa Takatsuki, Atsushi Nanashima, Hiroshi Matsufuji, Satoshi Ieiri

Introduction

In hepatobiliary surgery, bile exposure (BE) may cause complications such as bile peritonitis, slow postoperative recovery, and peritoneal dissemination of cancer cells in adult patients. We investigated the effect of BE on postoperative recovery and complications in pediatric patients with choledochal cysts (CCs) who underwent laparoscopic treatment.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of patients with CCs who underwent laparoscopic surgery at our institution and associated institutions between April 2016 and April 2024. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence (BE group) or absence (control group) of BE during surgery.

Results

Forty-three patients were enrolled in this study (control group, n = 25; BE group, n = 18). Patient background characteristics, operative results, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the patients' background characteristics and operative results between the two groups. The incidence of postoperative cholangitis was significantly higher in the BE group than in the control group (n = 1 [4.0%] vs. n = 6 [33.3%], p = 0.003). However, the incidence of stenosis at the anastomotic site and intrahepatic stones was not significantly different.

Conclusion

BE during surgery did not affect the postoperative recovery of patients with CCs treated by laparoscopic surgery. However, this did affect the rate of postoperative cholangitis. BE may be a factor contributing to the onset of postoperative cholangitis. Further investigations are necessary to clarify the mechanisms underlying the development of postoperative cholangitis in pediatric patients with CC.

导言:在肝胆外科手术中,胆暴露(BE)可能导致成人患者胆性腹膜炎、术后恢复缓慢和癌细胞在腹膜扩散等并发症。我们研究了BE对接受腹腔镜治疗的小儿胆总管囊肿(cc)患者术后恢复和并发症的影响。方法:我们回顾了2016年4月至2024年4月在我院及相关机构行腹腔镜手术的cc患者的医疗记录。根据手术中BE的存在(BE组)或不存在(对照组)将患者分为两组。结果:共纳入43例患者(对照组25例,BE组18例)。比较两组患者背景特征、手术结果及术后并发症。两组患者背景特征及手术效果无明显差异。BE组术后胆管炎发生率明显高于对照组(n = 1 [4.0%] vs. n = 6 [33.3%], p = 0.003)。然而,吻合口狭窄和肝内结石的发生率无显著差异。结论:术中BE对行腹腔镜手术的cc患者术后恢复无影响。然而,这确实影响了术后胆管炎的发生率。BE可能是导致术后胆管炎发生的一个因素。需要进一步的研究来阐明小儿CC患者术后胆管炎发生的机制。
{"title":"Does Bile Exposure During Surgery Affect the Postoperative Recovery and Complications of Pediatric Patients With Choledochal Cysts Treated by Laparoscopic Surgery?","authors":"Keisuke Yano,&nbsp;Masakazu Murakami,&nbsp;Shun Onishi,&nbsp;Koshiro Sugita,&nbsp;Toshio Harumatsu,&nbsp;Takafumi Kawano,&nbsp;Tokuro Baba,&nbsp;Masaaki Kuda,&nbsp;Kina Miyoshi,&nbsp;Yoshinori Koga,&nbsp;Jun Kuwabara,&nbsp;Ryuta Masuya,&nbsp;Makoto Hayashida,&nbsp;Kazuhiko Nakame,&nbsp;Shin Shinyama,&nbsp;Kyosuke Tatsuta,&nbsp;Yusuke Yanagi,&nbsp;Ryuichiro Hirose,&nbsp;Takeshi Shono,&nbsp;Misato Migita,&nbsp;Tatsuru Kaji,&nbsp;Mitsuhisa Takatsuki,&nbsp;Atsushi Nanashima,&nbsp;Hiroshi Matsufuji,&nbsp;Satoshi Ieiri","doi":"10.1111/ases.70168","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ases.70168","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In hepatobiliary surgery, bile exposure (BE) may cause complications such as bile peritonitis, slow postoperative recovery, and peritoneal dissemination of cancer cells in adult patients. We investigated the effect of BE on postoperative recovery and complications in pediatric patients with choledochal cysts (CCs) who underwent laparoscopic treatment.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We reviewed the medical records of patients with CCs who underwent laparoscopic surgery at our institution and associated institutions between April 2016 and April 2024. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence (BE group) or absence (control group) of BE during surgery.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Forty-three patients were enrolled in this study (control group, <i>n</i> = 25; BE group, <i>n</i> = 18). Patient background characteristics, operative results, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the patients' background characteristics and operative results between the two groups. The incidence of postoperative cholangitis was significantly higher in the BE group than in the control group (<i>n</i> = 1 [4.0%] vs. <i>n</i> = 6 [33.3%], <i>p</i> = 0.003). However, the incidence of stenosis at the anastomotic site and intrahepatic stones was not significantly different.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>BE during surgery did not affect the postoperative recovery of patients with CCs treated by laparoscopic surgery. However, this did affect the rate of postoperative cholangitis. BE may be a factor contributing to the onset of postoperative cholangitis. Further investigations are necessary to clarify the mechanisms underlying the development of postoperative cholangitis in pediatric patients with CC.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145349234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predictors of Pentafecta Failure Despite Trifecta Achievement in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy 机器人辅助部分肾切除术中三节切除后五节切除失败的预测因素。
IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-10-21 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70167
Ken Kamisawa, Toshikazu Takeda, Yui Nishimoto, Mio Tanigawa, Keishiro Fukumoto, Yota Yasumizu, Nobuyuki Tanaka, Kazuhiro Matsumoto, Shinya Morita, Takeo Kosaka, Hiroshi Asanuma, Mototsugu Oya

Introduction

The present study examined factors preventing the achievement of pentafecta in patients who have already met trifecta criteria following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).

Methods

A retrospective observational study was conducted on 103 patients who underwent RAPN for localized renal tumors at Keio University Hospital between 2019 and 2023. Clinical characteristics, surgical parameters, and postoperative renal function were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of trifecta and pentafecta achievement.

Results

The achievement rates for trifecta and pentafecta were 88% and 27%, respectively. Independent predictors of trifecta achievement were tumor size ≤ 20 mm (OR = 5.496, p = 0.039) and estimated blood loss ≤ 50 cc (OR = 7.983, p = 0.011). Significant predictors of pentafecta achievement were age ≤ 63 years (OR = 3.753, p = 0.026) and tumor exophyticity ≥ 50% (OR = 4.054, p = 0.018). Independent predictors of pentafecta failure despite trifecta achievement were age > 63 years (OR = 0.223, 95% CI: 1.347–14.904, p = 0.014) and tumor exophyticity < 50% (OR = 0.205, 95% CI: 1.474–16.159, p = 0.009). The pentafecta failure rate was 95% in patients who achieved trifecta but had both risk factors, namely, older age and embedded tumors.

Conclusion

Older age and tumor exophyticity < 50% are significant predictors of pentafecta failure despite achieving trifecta. The consideration of these factors may help refine surgical planning and postoperative management.

本研究调查了在机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)后已经达到三联体标准的患者中阻碍五联体实现的因素。方法:对2019年至2023年在庆应义塾大学医院行局限性肾肿瘤RAPN治疗的103例患者进行回顾性观察研究。分析临床特点、手术参数及术后肾功能。进行多因素logistic回归分析,以确定三联体和五联体的独立预测因素。结果:三连症和五连症的成功率分别为88%和27%。肿瘤大小≤20mm (OR = 5.496, p = 0.039)和估计失血量≤50cc (OR = 7.983, p = 0.011)是三联治疗成功的独立预测因子。年龄≤63岁(OR = 3.753, p = 0.026)和肿瘤外生性≥50% (OR = 4.054, p = 0.018)是五癌疗效的显著预测因子。三连用后五连用失败的独立预测因子为年龄0 ~ 63岁(OR = 0.223, 95% CI: 1.347 ~ 14.904, p = 0.014)和肿瘤外生性
{"title":"Predictors of Pentafecta Failure Despite Trifecta Achievement in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy","authors":"Ken Kamisawa,&nbsp;Toshikazu Takeda,&nbsp;Yui Nishimoto,&nbsp;Mio Tanigawa,&nbsp;Keishiro Fukumoto,&nbsp;Yota Yasumizu,&nbsp;Nobuyuki Tanaka,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Matsumoto,&nbsp;Shinya Morita,&nbsp;Takeo Kosaka,&nbsp;Hiroshi Asanuma,&nbsp;Mototsugu Oya","doi":"10.1111/ases.70167","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ases.70167","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The present study examined factors preventing the achievement of pentafecta in patients who have already met trifecta criteria following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A retrospective observational study was conducted on 103 patients who underwent RAPN for localized renal tumors at Keio University Hospital between 2019 and 2023. Clinical characteristics, surgical parameters, and postoperative renal function were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of trifecta and pentafecta achievement.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The achievement rates for trifecta and pentafecta were 88% and 27%, respectively. Independent predictors of trifecta achievement were tumor size ≤ 20 mm (OR = 5.496, <i>p</i> = 0.039) and estimated blood loss ≤ 50 cc (OR = 7.983, <i>p</i> = 0.011). Significant predictors of pentafecta achievement were age ≤ 63 years (OR = 3.753, <i>p</i> = 0.026) and tumor exophyticity ≥ 50% (OR = 4.054, <i>p</i> = 0.018). Independent predictors of pentafecta failure despite trifecta achievement were age &gt; 63 years (OR = 0.223, 95% CI: 1.347–14.904, <i>p</i> = 0.014) and tumor exophyticity &lt; 50% (OR = 0.205, 95% CI: 1.474–16.159, <i>p</i> = 0.009). The pentafecta failure rate was 95% in patients who achieved trifecta but had both risk factors, namely, older age and embedded tumors.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Older age and tumor exophyticity &lt; 50% are significant predictors of pentafecta failure despite achieving trifecta. The consideration of these factors may help refine surgical planning and postoperative management.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12540015/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145349227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safe Repair of a Delayed Right-Sided Traumatic Diaphragmatic Hernia Using Combined Thoracoscopy and Laparoscopy: A Case Report 胸腔镜与腹腔镜联合安全修复迟发性右侧外伤性膈疝1例。
IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-10-15 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70166
Hiroaki Hashimoto, Yoshihiro Miyazaki, Keisuke Kuroda, Naohiro Kobayashi, Yohei Owada, Hiromitsu Nakahashi, Tomoaki Furuta, Osamu Shimomura, Kazuhiro Takahashi, Shuntaro Tsukamoto, Kinji Furuya, Koichi Ogawa, Yoshimasa Akashi, Shinji Hashimoto, Tsuyoshi Enomoto, Tatsuya Oda

Delayed traumatic diaphragmatic hernias are rare, particularly those diagnosed decades after the initial trauma. We report a case of a right-sided diaphragmatic hernia that was identified 36 years after a blunt thoracic injury and successfully treated using a combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approach. A 78-year-old woman presented with progressive respiratory distress. Computed tomography revealed herniation of the small intestine and right colon through a posterior diaphragmatic defect into the right thoracic cavity. Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic procedures enabled safe adhesiolysis and closure of the hernia orifice. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient's respiratory distress improved markedly. While both thoracic and abdominal approaches are viable for diaphragmatic hernia repair, a combined approach provided enhanced visualization and safety in this complex case. This report highlights the feasibility and benefits of a minimally invasive combined approach in the management of delayed traumatic diaphragmatic hernias.

迟发性外伤性膈疝是罕见的,特别是那些在初次创伤后几十年才被诊断出来的。我们报告一例右侧膈疝,在钝性胸部损伤36年后被发现,并成功地使用胸腔镜和腹腔镜联合方法治疗。78岁女性,表现为进行性呼吸窘迫。计算机断层扫描显示小肠和右结肠疝通过后膈缺损进入右胸腔。胸腔镜和腹腔镜手术使疝口安全粘连和闭合。术后过程平稳,患者呼吸窘迫明显改善。虽然胸腹两路入路对膈疝修补都是可行的,但在这个复杂的病例中,联合入路提供了更好的可视性和安全性。本报告强调了微创联合入路治疗迟发性外伤性膈疝的可行性和益处。
{"title":"Safe Repair of a Delayed Right-Sided Traumatic Diaphragmatic Hernia Using Combined Thoracoscopy and Laparoscopy: A Case Report","authors":"Hiroaki Hashimoto,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Miyazaki,&nbsp;Keisuke Kuroda,&nbsp;Naohiro Kobayashi,&nbsp;Yohei Owada,&nbsp;Hiromitsu Nakahashi,&nbsp;Tomoaki Furuta,&nbsp;Osamu Shimomura,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Takahashi,&nbsp;Shuntaro Tsukamoto,&nbsp;Kinji Furuya,&nbsp;Koichi Ogawa,&nbsp;Yoshimasa Akashi,&nbsp;Shinji Hashimoto,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Enomoto,&nbsp;Tatsuya Oda","doi":"10.1111/ases.70166","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ases.70166","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Delayed traumatic diaphragmatic hernias are rare, particularly those diagnosed decades after the initial trauma. We report a case of a right-sided diaphragmatic hernia that was identified 36 years after a blunt thoracic injury and successfully treated using a combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approach. A 78-year-old woman presented with progressive respiratory distress. Computed tomography revealed herniation of the small intestine and right colon through a posterior diaphragmatic defect into the right thoracic cavity. Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic procedures enabled safe adhesiolysis and closure of the hernia orifice. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient's respiratory distress improved markedly. While both thoracic and abdominal approaches are viable for diaphragmatic hernia repair, a combined approach provided enhanced visualization and safety in this complex case. This report highlights the feasibility and benefits of a minimally invasive combined approach in the management of delayed traumatic diaphragmatic hernias.</p>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527593/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145303932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Effect of Posterior Colpotomy on Type of Delivery After Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction: A Systematic Review 阴道后切开术对自然孔口标本提取后分娩方式的影响:系统综述。
IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-10-13 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70160
Cihan Kaya, Hussein AlAli, Tugba Saka

Objective

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reproductive outcomes, including pregnancy rates and modes of delivery, in women of reproductive age who previously underwent vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES).

Data Sources

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases. The review used topic-specific keywords and MeSH terms such as (“transvaginal tissue removal” OR “Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery” OR “transvaginal tissue extraction” OR “transvaginal specimen extraction” OR NOTES OR vNOTES) AND (delivery OR childbirth OR birth).

Method Study Selection

All English-language articles focusing on vNOTES in women of reproductive age (18–45), with a uterus, and desiring to conceive were included. Studies were excluded if they involved bowel or gynecological malignancies, prior total hysterectomy, nonuse of posterior colpotomy for tissue removal, animal studies, or were not in English.

Tabulation, Integration, and Results

The quality of included studies was assessed using the Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Five studies out of 66 159 were included—four retrospective and one case series—encompassing 903 patients who underwent vNOTES for various procedures. These included laparoscopic and minimally invasive surgeries, such as cholecystectomy, appendectomy, gastric sleeve, intestinal operations, and gynecological procedures. Of these, 180 became pregnant: 12 had miscarriages, 47 had vaginal births, and 32 had C-sections (15 elective, five due to prior C-section). Fifty-eight used Assisted Reproductive Treatment (ART). No cases of sexual dysfunction, vaginal pain, laceration, or shortening were reported.

Conclusion

The findings suggest that vNOTES is a safe surgical approach for women wishing to conceive, as it does not negatively impact fertility or childbirth. Mode of delivery is influenced more by obstetric indications than by a history of vNOTES.

Trial Registration: Registered in PROSPERO (CRD420250644811)

目的:本研究的目的是评估育龄妇女曾接受阴道自然口腔内内镜手术(vNOTES)的生殖结局,包括妊娠率和分娩方式。数据来源:使用PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和EBSCO数据库进行文献检索。该综述使用了特定主题的关键词和MeSH术语,如(“经阴道组织切除”或“自然孔腔内窥镜手术”或“经阴道组织提取”或“经阴道标本提取”或NOTES或vNOTES)和(分娩或分娩或分娩)。方法研究选择:纳入所有育龄妇女(18-45岁)有子宫、有怀孕意愿的vNOTES英文文章。如果研究涉及肠或妇科恶性肿瘤、既往全子宫切除术、未使用后阴道切开术进行组织切除、动物研究或非英文研究则被排除。制表、整合和结果:采用非随机干预研究(ROBINS-I)工具评估纳入研究的质量。在66 159项研究中纳入了5项研究(4项回顾性研究和1项病例研究),包括903例因各种手术接受vNOTES的患者。其中包括腹腔镜手术和微创手术,如胆囊切除术、阑尾切除术、胃套管手术、肠道手术和妇科手术。其中,180人怀孕:12人流产,47人顺产,32人剖腹产(15人是自愿的,5人是因为之前剖腹产)。58人使用辅助生殖治疗(ART)。没有性功能障碍、阴道疼痛、撕裂或缩短的病例报道。结论:研究结果表明,vNOTES对于希望怀孕的女性来说是一种安全的手术方法,因为它不会对生育能力或分娩产生负面影响。分娩方式受产科指征的影响大于vNOTES病史的影响。试验报名:在PROSPERO注册(CRD420250644811)。
{"title":"The Effect of Posterior Colpotomy on Type of Delivery After Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction: A Systematic Review","authors":"Cihan Kaya,&nbsp;Hussein AlAli,&nbsp;Tugba Saka","doi":"10.1111/ases.70160","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ases.70160","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reproductive outcomes, including pregnancy rates and modes of delivery, in women of reproductive age who previously underwent vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Data Sources</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases. The review used topic-specific keywords and MeSH terms such as (“transvaginal tissue removal” OR “Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery” OR “transvaginal tissue extraction” OR “transvaginal specimen extraction” OR NOTES OR vNOTES) AND (delivery OR childbirth OR birth).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Method Study Selection</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>All English-language articles focusing on vNOTES in women of reproductive age (18–45), with a uterus, and desiring to conceive were included. Studies were excluded if they involved bowel or gynecological malignancies, prior total hysterectomy, nonuse of posterior colpotomy for tissue removal, animal studies, or were not in English.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Tabulation, Integration, and Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The quality of included studies was assessed using the Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Five studies out of 66 159 were included—four retrospective and one case series—encompassing 903 patients who underwent vNOTES for various procedures. These included laparoscopic and minimally invasive surgeries, such as cholecystectomy, appendectomy, gastric sleeve, intestinal operations, and gynecological procedures. Of these, 180 became pregnant: 12 had miscarriages, 47 had vaginal births, and 32 had C-sections (15 elective, five due to prior C-section). Fifty-eight used Assisted Reproductive Treatment (ART). No cases of sexual dysfunction, vaginal pain, laceration, or shortening were reported.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The findings suggest that vNOTES is a safe surgical approach for women wishing to conceive, as it does not negatively impact fertility or childbirth. Mode of delivery is influenced more by obstetric indications than by a history of vNOTES.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> Registered in PROSPERO (CRD420250644811)</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145287251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to the Letter to the Editor Regarding: Short-Term and 3-Year Oncological Outcomes in Laparoscopic-Assisted Trans-Anal Pelvic Exenteration With Preserving Anal Sphincter for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer 关于腹腔镜辅助经肛门盆腔切除保留肛门括约肌治疗局部晚期直肠癌的短期和3年肿瘤预后的回复。
IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-10-13 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70163
Takashi Nonaka, Tetsuro Tominaga, Toshio Shiraishi, Shintaro Hashimoto, Keisuke Noda, Terumitsu Sawai, Keitaro Matsumoto
{"title":"Response to the Letter to the Editor Regarding: Short-Term and 3-Year Oncological Outcomes in Laparoscopic-Assisted Trans-Anal Pelvic Exenteration With Preserving Anal Sphincter for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer","authors":"Takashi Nonaka,&nbsp;Tetsuro Tominaga,&nbsp;Toshio Shiraishi,&nbsp;Shintaro Hashimoto,&nbsp;Keisuke Noda,&nbsp;Terumitsu Sawai,&nbsp;Keitaro Matsumoto","doi":"10.1111/ases.70163","DOIUrl":"10.1111/ases.70163","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145287297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1