Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry最新文献

Background: Youth involved in child welfare have high rates of mental health problems and are known to receive mental health services from multiple settings. Still, gaps remain in our understanding of service use patterns across settings over the course of youth's involvement with child welfare.

Objective: To examine the settings, reasons for contact, persons involved in initiating care, and timing of each mental health service contact for individuals over their involvement with the child welfare system, and to identify factors that predict multi-setting use.

Methods: Data on mental health service contacts were collected retrospectively from charts for youth aged 11-18 (n=226) during their involvement with child welfare services in Montreal, Quebec. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine predictors of multi-setting mental health services use (defined as ≥3 settings).

Results: 83% of youth had at least one mental health service contact over the course of their child welfare services follow-up, with 45% having multi-setting use. Emergency Departments were the top setting for mental health services. Youth with a higher number of placements and from neighborhoods with greater social and material deprivation were significantly likelier to use ≥3 mental health service settings over the course of their follow-up.

Conclusion: These findings suggest a need for enhanced collaboration between youth-serving sectors to ensure that continuous and appropriate mental health care is being offered to youth followed by child welfare systems. The relationship between placement instability and multi-setting mental health service use calls for specific policies to ensure that young people do not experience multiple discontinuities of care.

Background: The current understanding of the effect of COVID-19 on child and youth admissions to psychiatric inpatient units over time is limited, with conflicting findings and many studies focusing on the initial wave of the pandemic.

Objectives: This study identified changes in psychiatric inpatient admissions, and reasons for admission, including suicidality and self-harm, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Method: This time series study analyzed 3,723 admissions of youth (ages 0-18.88 years) admitted to four major psychiatry inpatient units in a large Canadian city between January 1^st, 2016 and December 31^st, 2021. Pre-pandemic (before March 11, 2020) and during-pandemic (after March 11, 2020) trends of admissions were explored using a Bayesian structural time series model (BSTS).

Results: The model revealed that overall admissions during the pandemic period exceeded what would have been predicted in the absence of a pandemic, a relative increase of 29%. Additionally, a rise in the total number of admissions due to self-harm and suicidality (29% increase), externalizing/behavioral issues (69% increase), and internalizing/emotional issues (28% increase) provided strong evidence of increased admissions compared to what might have been expected from pre-pandemic numbers.

Conclusions: There was strong evidence of increases in psychiatric inpatient admissions during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to expected trends based on pre-pandemic data. To ensure accessible and continuous mental health supports and services for youth and their families during future pandemics, these findings highlight the need for rapid expanse of inpatient mental health services, similar to what occurred in many intensive care units across Canada.

Background: Early substance use is associated with increased risks for mental health and substance use problems which are compounded when using several substances (i.e., polysubstance use). A notable increase in substance use occurs when adolescents transition from elementary to secondary schooling.

Objective: This study seeks to characterize student and school classes of substance use.

Methods: A cross-sectional multilevel latent class analysis and regression was conducted on a representative sample of 19,130 grade 6-8 students from 180 elementary schools in Ontario, Canada to: 1) identify distinct classes of student substance use; 2) identify classes of schools based on student classes; and 3) explore correlates of these classes, including mental health, school climate, belonging, safety, and extracurricular participation.

Results: Two student and two school classes were identified. 4.1% of students were assigned to the high probability of early polysubstance use class while the remaining 95.9% were in the low probability class. Students experiencing depressive and externalizing symptoms had higher odds of being in the early polysubstance use class (Odds Ratio [OR]s=1.1-1.25). At the school level, 19% of schools had higher proportions of students endorsing polysubstance use. Perceptions of positive school climate, belonging, and safety increased the odds of students being in the low probability of early polysubstance use student-level class (ORs=0.85-0.93) and lower probability of early polysubstance use school-level class. Associations related to extracurricular participation were largely not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Student and school substance use classes may serve as targets for tailored prevention and early interventions. Results support examining school-based interventions targeting school climate, belonging, and safety.

Introduction: Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is an eating disorder characterised by a pattern of eating that leads to failure to meet appropriate nutritional and/or energy needs.

Method: In the absence of evidence-based inpatient guidelines for adolescents with ARFID, we set out to develop and pilot an inpatient protocol for adolescents with ARFID. Identification of the key differences between managing inpatients with ARFID and anorexia nervosa (AN) led to modification of an existing AN protocol with the goals of better meeting patient needs, enhancing alignment with outpatient care, and improving outcomes. A case report of an adolescent with ARFID who had three hospital admissions is presented to highlight these changes. Interviews with this patient and her family were undertaken, together with key staff, to explore the challenges of the AN protocol for this patient and the perceived benefits and any limitations of the ARFID protocol for this patient and others.

Results: The new ARFID protocol supports greater choice of meals, without the need for rest periods after meals and bathroom supervision. The similarities with the AN protocol reflect the need to promote timely weight gain through meal support, including a staged approach to nutritional supplementation. The protocol appears to have been well accepted by the patient and her family, as well as by staff, and continues to be used in cases of ARFID.

Conclusion: Further evaluation would help identify how well this protocol meets the needs of different adolescents with ARFID.