首页 > 最新文献

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation最新文献

英文 中文
Mitigating role of financial inclusion on the perceived difficulties, concerns, and borrowing for medical expenses in Saudi Arabia. 在沙特阿拉伯,普惠金融对医疗费用的认知困难、担忧和借贷的缓解作用。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-09 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-023-00506-z
Mohammed Khaled Al-Hanawi, Naseem Al Rahahleh

Access to convenient quality healthcare at all times is considered a basic human right; however, many countries are still striving to achieve this goal for their populations. The persistent rise in healthcare expenditure remains a significant obstacle in achieving universal health coverage on a global scale. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of financial inclusion in addressing the financial hardship related to health and medical expense concerns in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Probit models were applied to analyse nationally representative data from the Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) database. The results showed that financial inclusion had a significant impact on reducing the hardship associated with obtaining money for emergency expenses within 30 days as indicated by a significant coefficient of -0.262. Additionally, Financial inclusion substantially increases the likelihood of borrowing money for health or medical purposes in the past 12 months, with a coefficient of 0.585. Moreover, correlations were identified between low income levels and decreased likelihood of borrowing for health/medical purposes, increased difficulty in obtaining money for emergency expenses, and heightened concern regarding the ability to afford medical costs in the event of serious illness or accidents. These findings highlight the need for policy makers and health providers to prioritize financial inclusion and support programs for low-income individuals to achieve equity in health treatment for all in Saudi Arabia.

任何时候都能获得便捷优质的医疗保健服务被视为一项基本人权;然而,许多国家仍在努力为本国人民实现这一目标。医疗保健支出的持续增长仍然是在全球范围内实现全民医保的一个重大障碍。本研究旨在探讨在沙特阿拉伯王国,普惠金融在解决与健康和医疗费用相关的经济困难方面所起的作用。研究采用 Probit 模型分析了全球普惠金融(Global Findex)数据库中具有全国代表性的数据。结果表明,普惠金融对减少与 30 天内获得紧急费用相关的资金困难有显著影响,其显著系数为-0.262。此外,普惠金融还大大增加了过去 12 个月内为健康或医疗目的借款的可能性,系数为 0.585。此外,还发现低收入水平与为健康/医疗目的借款的可能性降低、获得应急费用的难度增加以及对重病或意外情况下支付医疗费用能力的担忧增加之间存在相关性。这些研究结果突出表明,政策制定者和医疗服务提供者有必要优先考虑金融包容性,并支持针对低收入人群的计划,以实现沙特阿拉伯所有人在健康治疗方面的平等。
{"title":"Mitigating role of financial inclusion on the perceived difficulties, concerns, and borrowing for medical expenses in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Mohammed Khaled Al-Hanawi, Naseem Al Rahahleh","doi":"10.1186/s12962-023-00506-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12962-023-00506-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Access to convenient quality healthcare at all times is considered a basic human right; however, many countries are still striving to achieve this goal for their populations. The persistent rise in healthcare expenditure remains a significant obstacle in achieving universal health coverage on a global scale. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of financial inclusion in addressing the financial hardship related to health and medical expense concerns in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Probit models were applied to analyse nationally representative data from the Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) database. The results showed that financial inclusion had a significant impact on reducing the hardship associated with obtaining money for emergency expenses within 30 days as indicated by a significant coefficient of -0.262. Additionally, Financial inclusion substantially increases the likelihood of borrowing money for health or medical purposes in the past 12 months, with a coefficient of 0.585. Moreover, correlations were identified between low income levels and decreased likelihood of borrowing for health/medical purposes, increased difficulty in obtaining money for emergency expenses, and heightened concern regarding the ability to afford medical costs in the event of serious illness or accidents. These findings highlight the need for policy makers and health providers to prioritize financial inclusion and support programs for low-income individuals to achieve equity in health treatment for all in Saudi Arabia.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10775537/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139404793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investing in midwifery for sustainable development goals in low- and middle-income countries: a cost-benefit analysis. 为中低收入国家的可持续发展目标投资助产:成本效益分析。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-04 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-023-00507-y
Chakib Boukhalfa, Brahim Ouakhzan, Hanane Masbah, Leila Acharai, Saad Zbiri

Background: Maternal and neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries is frequently caused by inadequate management of obstetric and neonatal complications and a shortage of skilled health workers. The availability of these workers is essential for effective and high-quality healthcare. To meet the needs of sexual, reproductive, maternal, new-born, child, and adolescent health by 2030, more than one million health workers, including 900 000 midwives, are required globally. Despite this, uncertainty persists regarding the return on investment in the health workforce.

Methods: The objective of this research was to determine the cost-benefit ratio of increasing investment in midwifery in Morocco from 2021 to 2030. A comparative analysis was conducted between scenarios "with" and "without" the additional investment. The costs and benefits were estimated using relevant data from national and international sources.

Results: Following the International Confederation of Midwives' recommendations, it is advised that Morocco recruit 760 midwives annually to achieve 95% of universal health coverage. This increase in midwifery could result in saving 120 593 lives by 2030, including reducing maternal deaths by 3 201, stillbirths by 48 399, and neonatal deaths by 68 993. The estimated economic benefit of investing in midwives was US$ 10 152 287 749, while the total cost was US$ 638 288 820. Consequently, the cost-benefit ratio was calculated as 15.91, indicating that investing in midwifery would provide 16 times more benefits than costs.

Conclusion: Increasing investment in midwifery appears to be an efficient strategy for achieving comprehensive maternal and child health coverage in low- and middle-income countries.

背景:中低收入国家的孕产妇和新生儿死亡率往往是由于产科和新生儿并发症处理不当以及熟练保健人员短缺造成的。要提供有效和高质量的医疗保健服务,就必须要有这些医务人员。到 2030 年,为满足性健康、生殖健康、孕产妇健康、新生儿健康、儿童健康和青少年健康的需求,全球需要超过 100 万名卫生工作者,其中包括 90 万名助产士。尽管如此,对卫生工作者队伍的投资回报仍存在不确定性:本研究的目的是确定 2021 年至 2030 年摩洛哥增加助产士投资的成本效益比。对 "增加 "和 "不增加 "投资的方案进行了比较分析。利用国内和国际相关数据对成本和效益进行了估算:根据国际助产士联合会的建议,建议摩洛哥每年招聘 760 名助产士,以实现 95% 的全民医保。到 2030 年,助产士人数的增加可挽救 120 593 条生命,包括减少产妇死亡 3 201 例、死胎死亡 48 399 例和新生儿死亡 68 993 例。投资助产士的经济效益估计为 10 152 287 749 美元,而总成本为 638 288 820 美元。因此,计算出的成本效益比为 15.91,表明对助产士的投资所带来的收益是成本的 16 倍:结论:增加对助产服务的投资似乎是中低收入国家实现妇幼保健全面覆盖的有效战略。
{"title":"Investing in midwifery for sustainable development goals in low- and middle-income countries: a cost-benefit analysis.","authors":"Chakib Boukhalfa, Brahim Ouakhzan, Hanane Masbah, Leila Acharai, Saad Zbiri","doi":"10.1186/s12962-023-00507-y","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12962-023-00507-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternal and neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries is frequently caused by inadequate management of obstetric and neonatal complications and a shortage of skilled health workers. The availability of these workers is essential for effective and high-quality healthcare. To meet the needs of sexual, reproductive, maternal, new-born, child, and adolescent health by 2030, more than one million health workers, including 900 000 midwives, are required globally. Despite this, uncertainty persists regarding the return on investment in the health workforce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The objective of this research was to determine the cost-benefit ratio of increasing investment in midwifery in Morocco from 2021 to 2030. A comparative analysis was conducted between scenarios \"with\" and \"without\" the additional investment. The costs and benefits were estimated using relevant data from national and international sources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the International Confederation of Midwives' recommendations, it is advised that Morocco recruit 760 midwives annually to achieve 95% of universal health coverage. This increase in midwifery could result in saving 120 593 lives by 2030, including reducing maternal deaths by 3 201, stillbirths by 48 399, and neonatal deaths by 68 993. The estimated economic benefit of investing in midwives was US$ 10 152 287 749, while the total cost was US$ 638 288 820. Consequently, the cost-benefit ratio was calculated as 15.91, indicating that investing in midwifery would provide 16 times more benefits than costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increasing investment in midwifery appears to be an efficient strategy for achieving comprehensive maternal and child health coverage in low- and middle-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10768217/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139098940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Population ageing and sustainability of healthcare financing in China. 中国人口老龄化与医疗筹资的可持续性。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-023-00505-0
Wenqing Wu, Shujie Long, Arcadio A Cerda, Leidy Y Garcia, Mihajlo Jakovljevic

Background: In China, the healthcare financing structure involves multiple parties, including the government, society and individuals. Medicare Fund is an important way for the Government and society to reduce the burden of individual medical costs. However, with the aging of the population, the demand of Medicare Fund is increasing. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the sustainability of the healthcare financing structure in the context of population ageing.

Objective: The purpose of this paper is to organize the characteristics of population ageing as well as healthcare financing in China. On this basis, it analyzes the impact mechanism of population ageing on healthcare financing and the sustainability of existing healthcare financing.

Methods: This paper mainly adopts the method of literature research and inductive summarization. Extracting data from Health Statistics Yearbook of China and Labor and Social Security Statistics Yearbook of China. Collected about 60 pieces of relevant literature at home and abroad.

Results: China has already entered a deeply ageing society. Unlike developed countries in the world, China's population ageing has distinctive feature of ageing before being rich. A healthcare financing scheme established by China, composing of the government, society, and individuals, is reasonable. However, under the pressure of population ageing, China's current healthcare financing scheme will face enormous challenges. Scholars are generally pessimistic about the sustainability of China's healthcare financing scheme.

Conclusions: Population ageing will increase the expenditure and reduce the income of the Medicare Fund. This will further affect the sustainability of the healthcare financing structure. As a consequence, the state should pay particular attention to this issue and take action to ensure that the Fund continues to operate steadily.

背景:在中国,医疗筹资结构涉及政府、社会和个人等多个方面。医疗保障基金是政府和社会减轻个人医疗费用负担的重要途径。然而,随着人口老龄化的加剧,对医疗保险基金的需求也在不断增加。因此,有必要探讨人口老龄化背景下医疗筹资结构的可持续性:本文旨在梳理中国人口老龄化以及医疗筹资的特点,并在此基础上分析中国医疗筹资结构的可持续 性。在此基础上,分析人口老龄化对医疗筹资的影响机制以及现有医疗筹资的可持续性:本文主要采用文献研究法和归纳总结法。从《中国卫生统计年鉴》和《中国劳动和社会保障统计年鉴》中提取数据。收集国内外相关文献约 60 篇:中国已经进入深度老龄化社会。与世界发达国家不同,中国的人口老龄化具有明显的未富先老特征。中国建立的由政府、社会、个人三方共同参与的医疗筹资机制是合理的。然而,在人口老龄化的压力下,中国现行的医疗筹资制度将面临巨大的挑战。学者们普遍对中国医疗筹资制度的可持续性持悲观态度:结论:人口老龄化将增加医疗保险基金的支出,减少医疗保险基金的收入。结论:人口老龄化将增加医疗保险基金的支出,减少医疗保险基金的收入,这将进一步影 响医疗筹资结构的可持续性。因此,国家应特别关注这一问题,并采取行动确保基金继续稳定运行。
{"title":"Population ageing and sustainability of healthcare financing in China.","authors":"Wenqing Wu, Shujie Long, Arcadio A Cerda, Leidy Y Garcia, Mihajlo Jakovljevic","doi":"10.1186/s12962-023-00505-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12962-023-00505-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In China, the healthcare financing structure involves multiple parties, including the government, society and individuals. Medicare Fund is an important way for the Government and society to reduce the burden of individual medical costs. However, with the aging of the population, the demand of Medicare Fund is increasing. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the sustainability of the healthcare financing structure in the context of population ageing.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this paper is to organize the characteristics of population ageing as well as healthcare financing in China. On this basis, it analyzes the impact mechanism of population ageing on healthcare financing and the sustainability of existing healthcare financing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This paper mainly adopts the method of literature research and inductive summarization. Extracting data from Health Statistics Yearbook of China and Labor and Social Security Statistics Yearbook of China. Collected about 60 pieces of relevant literature at home and abroad.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>China has already entered a deeply ageing society. Unlike developed countries in the world, China's population ageing has distinctive feature of ageing before being rich. A healthcare financing scheme established by China, composing of the government, society, and individuals, is reasonable. However, under the pressure of population ageing, China's current healthcare financing scheme will face enormous challenges. Scholars are generally pessimistic about the sustainability of China's healthcare financing scheme.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Population ageing will increase the expenditure and reduce the income of the Medicare Fund. This will further affect the sustainability of the healthcare financing structure. As a consequence, the state should pay particular attention to this issue and take action to ensure that the Fund continues to operate steadily.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10729482/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138803752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Resource allocation in public sector programmes: does the value of a life differ between governmental departments? 公共部门计划的资源分配:不同政府部门的生命价值是否不同?
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-023-00500-5
Patricia Cubi-Molla, David Mott, Nadine Henderson, Bernarda Zamora, Mendel Grobler, Martina Garau

Background: The value of a life is regularly monetised by government departments for informing resource allocation. Guidance documents indicate how economic evaluation should be conducted, often specifying precise values for different impacts. However, we find different values of life and health are used in analyses by departments within the same government despite commonality in desired outcomes. This creates potential inconsistencies in considering trade-offs within a broader public sector spending budget. We provide evidence to better inform the political process and to raise important issues in assessing the value of public expenditure across different sectors.

Methods: Our document analysis identifies thresholds, explicitly or implicitly, as observed in government-related publications in the following public sectors: health, social care, transport, and environment. We include both demand-side and supply-side thresholds, understood as societies' and governments' willingness to pay for health gains. We look at key countries that introduced formal economic evaluation processes early on and have impacted other countries' policy development: Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. We also present a framework to consider how governments allocate resources across different public services.

Results: Our analysis supports that identifying and describing the Value of a Life from disparate public sector activities in a manner that facilitates comparison is theoretically meaningful. The optimal allocation of resources across sectors depends on the relative position of benefits across different attributes, weighted by the social value that society puts on them. The value of a Quality-Adjusted Life Year is generally used as a demand-side threshold by Departments of transport and environment. It exceeds those used in health, often by a large enough proportion to be a multiple thereof. Decisions made across departments are generally based on an unspecified rationing rule.

Conclusions: Comparing government expenditure across different public sector departments, in terms of the value of each department outcome, is not only possible but also desirable. It is essential for an optimal resource allocation to identify the relevant social attributes and to quantify the value of these attributes for each department.

背景:政府部门经常将生命的价值货币化,以便为资源分配提供信息。指导文件指出了应如何进行经济评价,通常还规定了不同影响的精确值。然而,我们发现,尽管预期结果相同,但同一政府部门在分析中却使用了不同的生命和健康价值。这就造成了在更广泛的公共部门支出预算中考虑权衡时可能出现的不一致。我们提供证据,以便更好地为政治进程提供信息,并提出评估不同部门公共支出价值的重要问题:我们的文件分析确定了政府相关出版物中明确或隐含的阈值,这些出版物涉及以下公共部门:医疗卫生、社会医疗、交通和环境。我们将需求方和供应方的阈值都包括在内,即社会和政府为健康收益付费的意愿。我们研究了那些较早引入正式经济评估程序并对其他国家的政策制定产生影响的主要国家:澳大利亚、加拿大、日本、新西兰、荷兰和英国。我们还提出了一个框架,以考虑政府如何在不同的公共服务中分配资源:我们的分析表明,以一种便于比较的方式从不同的公共部门活动中识别和描述 "生命价值 "在理论上是有意义的。各部门之间的最佳资源配置取决于不同属性利益的相对位置,并根据社会赋予这些属性的社会价值进行加权。质量调整生命年的价值通常被交通和环境部门用作需求方阈值。它超过了卫生部门所使用的阈值,其比例往往大到足以成为阈值的倍数。各部门的决定一般都是基于一个不明确的配给规则:从各部门成果的价值角度比较不同公共部门的政府支出不仅是可能的,而且是可取的。确定相关的社会属性并量化这些属性对每个部门的价值,对于优化资源分配至关重要。
{"title":"Resource allocation in public sector programmes: does the value of a life differ between governmental departments?","authors":"Patricia Cubi-Molla, David Mott, Nadine Henderson, Bernarda Zamora, Mendel Grobler, Martina Garau","doi":"10.1186/s12962-023-00500-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-023-00500-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The value of a life is regularly monetised by government departments for informing resource allocation. Guidance documents indicate how economic evaluation should be conducted, often specifying precise values for different impacts. However, we find different values of life and health are used in analyses by departments within the same government despite commonality in desired outcomes. This creates potential inconsistencies in considering trade-offs within a broader public sector spending budget. We provide evidence to better inform the political process and to raise important issues in assessing the value of public expenditure across different sectors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our document analysis identifies thresholds, explicitly or implicitly, as observed in government-related publications in the following public sectors: health, social care, transport, and environment. We include both demand-side and supply-side thresholds, understood as societies' and governments' willingness to pay for health gains. We look at key countries that introduced formal economic evaluation processes early on and have impacted other countries' policy development: Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. We also present a framework to consider how governments allocate resources across different public services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis supports that identifying and describing the Value of a Life from disparate public sector activities in a manner that facilitates comparison is theoretically meaningful. The optimal allocation of resources across sectors depends on the relative position of benefits across different attributes, weighted by the social value that society puts on them. The value of a Quality-Adjusted Life Year is generally used as a demand-side threshold by Departments of transport and environment. It exceeds those used in health, often by a large enough proportion to be a multiple thereof. Decisions made across departments are generally based on an unspecified rationing rule.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comparing government expenditure across different public sector departments, in terms of the value of each department outcome, is not only possible but also desirable. It is essential for an optimal resource allocation to identify the relevant social attributes and to quantify the value of these attributes for each department.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10722785/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138804002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative effectiveness and cost evaluation of Risankizumab and Adalimumab in the management of psoriasis: a real-world study in Saudi Arabia. 利桑珠单抗和阿达木单抗治疗银屑病的疗效比较和成本评估:沙特阿拉伯的一项真实世界研究。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-09 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-023-00504-1
Yazed AlRuthia, Almaha H Alfakhri, Ibtisam Alharbi, Fadi Ali Alghamdi, Miteb A Alanazi, Abdullah Abdulrahman Alrabiah, Anwar Abdulrazzag Alsouan, Abdulrahman Abdullah Alshaikh, Majed Ali Almasaoud

Background: Psoriasis, an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory disease primarily affecting skin and joints, has varying prevalence rates globally. It manifests in five types, with chronic plaque psoriasis being the most common. Treatment, which has no definitive cure, aims for complete resolution of skin symptoms and depends on disease extent, severity, and impact on patients' lives. Biologics are an emerging treatment for psoriasis, targeting specific inflammatory pathways for potentially safer, more effective outcomes. However, these come with significant costs, necessitating more research to ensure value for money. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Risankizumab versus Adalimumab, the most commonly utilized biologic for managing psoriasis in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: This study retrospectively compared the effectiveness and direct medical cost of Risankizumab and Adalimumab in treating chronic plaque psoriasis in adults from two Saudi Arabian healthcare centers. The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and body surface area (BSA) were used to assess treatment effectiveness, with patient data sourced from electronic medical records. Multiple regression analysis was performed to examine various factors affecting treatment outcomes. An economic evaluation was conducted to examine the cost-effectiveness of the two drugs, considering four scenarios with varying dosage patterns and costs. Analysis was performed from the perspective of public healthcare payers and considered all utilized health services.

Results: The data for 70 patients were analyzed, with comparable baseline characteristics between groups. While Risankizumab led to a greater reduction in PASI scores and BSA affected, these results were not statistically significant. The annual treatment cost for Risankizumab was higher than Adalimumab. Various scenarios were studied, considering real acquisition costs, double dosing for Adalimumab, and the use of biosimilars. A scenario assuming double dosing for Adalimumab and a 40% discount for Risankizumab demonstrated both cost and efficacy advantages in 71.25% of cases.

Conclusions: This study compared the effectiveness and cost of Risankizumab and Adalimumab for treating chronic plaque psoriasis in Saudi Arabian hospitals. Although Risankizumab showed a greater reduction in symptoms, the difference was not statistically significant. However, under certain scenarios, Risankizumab demonstrated cost and efficacy advantages. These findings may influence treatment decisions for psoriasis, but further research is needed.

背景:银屑病是一种免疫介导的慢性炎症性疾病,主要影响皮肤和关节,在全球的发病率各不相同。银屑病分为五种类型,其中以慢性斑块型银屑病最为常见。目前尚无根治方法,治疗目的是彻底消除皮肤症状,并取决于疾病的范围、严重程度和对患者生活的影响。生物制剂是一种新兴的银屑病治疗方法,它以特定的炎症通路为靶点,具有更安全、更有效的潜在疗效。然而,生物制剂成本高昂,因此有必要开展更多研究,以确保物有所值。本研究旨在比较利桑珠单抗与阿达木单抗的疗效,后者是沙特阿拉伯最常用的治疗银屑病的生物制剂:本研究回顾性比较了利坦单抗和阿达木单抗治疗沙特阿拉伯两家医疗中心成人慢性斑块状银屑病的疗效和直接医疗成本。评估治疗效果时使用了银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)和体表面积(BSA),患者数据来自电子病历。进行了多元回归分析,以研究影响治疗效果的各种因素。在考虑了四种不同剂量模式和成本的情况下,对两种药物的成本效益进行了经济评估。分析从公共医疗支付方的角度进行,并考虑了所有使用的医疗服务:结果:分析了 70 名患者的数据,两组患者的基线特征具有可比性。虽然利桑珠单抗能使患者的 PASI 评分和 BSA 下降更多,但这些结果在统计学上并不显著。利桑珠单抗的年度治疗费用高于阿达木单抗。考虑到实际购买成本、阿达木单抗的双重剂量以及生物仿制药的使用,研究了各种方案。假设阿达木单抗使用双剂量,利桑珠单抗使用40%的折扣,在71.25%的病例中,成本和疗效均有优势:这项研究比较了利桑珠单抗和阿达木单抗在沙特阿拉伯医院治疗慢性斑块状银屑病的疗效和成本。尽管利桑珠单抗能更有效地减轻症状,但两者之间的差异在统计学上并不显著。不过,在某些情况下,利桑珠单抗在成本和疗效上都具有优势。这些发现可能会影响银屑病的治疗决策,但还需要进一步研究。
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness and cost evaluation of Risankizumab and Adalimumab in the management of psoriasis: a real-world study in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Yazed AlRuthia, Almaha H Alfakhri, Ibtisam Alharbi, Fadi Ali Alghamdi, Miteb A Alanazi, Abdullah Abdulrahman Alrabiah, Anwar Abdulrazzag Alsouan, Abdulrahman Abdullah Alshaikh, Majed Ali Almasaoud","doi":"10.1186/s12962-023-00504-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-023-00504-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psoriasis, an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory disease primarily affecting skin and joints, has varying prevalence rates globally. It manifests in five types, with chronic plaque psoriasis being the most common. Treatment, which has no definitive cure, aims for complete resolution of skin symptoms and depends on disease extent, severity, and impact on patients' lives. Biologics are an emerging treatment for psoriasis, targeting specific inflammatory pathways for potentially safer, more effective outcomes. However, these come with significant costs, necessitating more research to ensure value for money. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Risankizumab versus Adalimumab, the most commonly utilized biologic for managing psoriasis in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively compared the effectiveness and direct medical cost of Risankizumab and Adalimumab in treating chronic plaque psoriasis in adults from two Saudi Arabian healthcare centers. The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and body surface area (BSA) were used to assess treatment effectiveness, with patient data sourced from electronic medical records. Multiple regression analysis was performed to examine various factors affecting treatment outcomes. An economic evaluation was conducted to examine the cost-effectiveness of the two drugs, considering four scenarios with varying dosage patterns and costs. Analysis was performed from the perspective of public healthcare payers and considered all utilized health services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data for 70 patients were analyzed, with comparable baseline characteristics between groups. While Risankizumab led to a greater reduction in PASI scores and BSA affected, these results were not statistically significant. The annual treatment cost for Risankizumab was higher than Adalimumab. Various scenarios were studied, considering real acquisition costs, double dosing for Adalimumab, and the use of biosimilars. A scenario assuming double dosing for Adalimumab and a 40% discount for Risankizumab demonstrated both cost and efficacy advantages in 71.25% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study compared the effectiveness and cost of Risankizumab and Adalimumab for treating chronic plaque psoriasis in Saudi Arabian hospitals. Although Risankizumab showed a greater reduction in symptoms, the difference was not statistically significant. However, under certain scenarios, Risankizumab demonstrated cost and efficacy advantages. These findings may influence treatment decisions for psoriasis, but further research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10709881/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138803150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cost analysis of the management of end-stage renal disease patients in Abuja, Nigeria. 尼日利亚阿布贾终末期肾病患者管理成本分析。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-08 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-023-00502-3
Yakubu Adole Agada-Amade, Daniel Chukwuemeka Ogbuabor, Ejemai Eboreime, Obinna Emmanuel Onwujekwe

Background: Although the treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) under Nigeria's National Health Insurance Authority is haemodialysis (HD), the cost of managing ESRD is understudied in Nigeria. Therefore, this study estimated the provider and patient direct costs of haemodialysis and managing ESRD in Abuja, Nigeria.

Method: The study was a cross-sectional survey from both healthcare provider and consumer perspectives. We collected data from public and private tertiary hospitals (n = 6) and ESRD patients (n = 230) receiving haemodialysis in the selected hospitals. We estimated the direct providers' costs using fixed and variable costs. Patients' direct costs included drugs, laboratory services, transportation, feeding, and comorbidities. Additionally, data on the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients were collected. The costs were summarized in descriptive statistics using means and percentages. A generalized linear model (gamma with log link) was used to predict the patient characteristics associated with patients' cost of haemodialysis.

Results: The mean direct cost of haemodialysis was $152.20 per session (providers: $123.69; and patients: $28.51) and $23,742.96 annually (providers: $19,295.64; and patients: $4,447.32). Additionally, patients spent an average of $2,968.23 managing comorbidities. The drivers of providers' haemodialysis costs were personnel and supplies. Residing in other towns (HD:β = 0.55, ρ = 0.001; ESRD:β = 0.59, ρ = 0.004), lacking health insurance (HD:β = 0.24, ρ = 0.038), attending private health facility (HD:β = 0.46, ρ < 0.001; ESRD: β = 0.75, ρ < 0.001), and greater than six haemodialysis sessions per month (HD:β = 0.79, ρ < 0.001; ESRD: β = 0.99, ρ < 0.001) significantly increased the patient's out-of-pocket spending on haemodialysis and ESRD.

Conclusion: The costs of haemodialysis and managing ESRD patients are high. Providing public subsidies for dialysis and expanding social health insurance coverage for ESRD patients might reduce the costs.

背景:尽管尼日利亚国家医疗保险局规定终末期肾病(ESRD)的治疗方法是血液透析(HD),但尼日利亚对 ESRD 的管理成本研究不足。因此,本研究估算了尼日利亚阿布贾血液透析和 ESRD 管理的提供者和患者直接成本:本研究是从医疗服务提供者和消费者的角度进行的横断面调查。我们从公立和私立三级医院(n = 6)以及在选定医院接受血液透析的 ESRD 患者(n = 230)处收集数据。我们使用固定成本和可变成本估算了医疗机构的直接成本。患者的直接成本包括药物、实验室服务、交通、喂养和合并症。此外,我们还收集了患者的社会人口学和临床特征数据。使用平均值和百分比对成本进行描述性统计。采用广义线性模型(对数连接的伽马模型)预测与患者血液透析费用相关的患者特征:血液透析的平均直接费用为每次 152.20 美元(医疗机构:123.69 美元;患者:28.51 美元),每年 23,742.96 美元(医疗机构:19,295.64 美元;患者:4,447.32 美元)。此外,患者管理合并症的平均花费为 2,968.23 美元。导致医疗机构血液透析成本增加的因素是人员和用品。居住在其他城镇(HD:β = 0.55,ρ = 0.001;ESRD:β = 0.59,ρ = 0.004)、没有医疗保险(HD:β = 0.24,ρ = 0.038)、在私人医疗机构就诊(HD:β = 0.46,ρ 结论:血液透析的成本与患者的健康状况密切相关:血液透析和 ESRD 患者的管理成本很高。为透析提供公共补贴并扩大 ESRD 患者的社会医疗保险覆盖面可降低成本。
{"title":"Cost analysis of the management of end-stage renal disease patients in Abuja, Nigeria.","authors":"Yakubu Adole Agada-Amade, Daniel Chukwuemeka Ogbuabor, Ejemai Eboreime, Obinna Emmanuel Onwujekwe","doi":"10.1186/s12962-023-00502-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-023-00502-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) under Nigeria's National Health Insurance Authority is haemodialysis (HD), the cost of managing ESRD is understudied in Nigeria. Therefore, this study estimated the provider and patient direct costs of haemodialysis and managing ESRD in Abuja, Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study was a cross-sectional survey from both healthcare provider and consumer perspectives. We collected data from public and private tertiary hospitals (n = 6) and ESRD patients (n = 230) receiving haemodialysis in the selected hospitals. We estimated the direct providers' costs using fixed and variable costs. Patients' direct costs included drugs, laboratory services, transportation, feeding, and comorbidities. Additionally, data on the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients were collected. The costs were summarized in descriptive statistics using means and percentages. A generalized linear model (gamma with log link) was used to predict the patient characteristics associated with patients' cost of haemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean direct cost of haemodialysis was $152.20 per session (providers: $123.69; and patients: $28.51) and $23,742.96 annually (providers: $19,295.64; and patients: $4,447.32). Additionally, patients spent an average of $2,968.23 managing comorbidities. The drivers of providers' haemodialysis costs were personnel and supplies. Residing in other towns (HD:β = 0.55, ρ = 0.001; ESRD:β = 0.59, ρ = 0.004), lacking health insurance (HD:β = 0.24, ρ = 0.038), attending private health facility (HD:β = 0.46, ρ < 0.001; ESRD: β = 0.75, ρ < 0.001), and greater than six haemodialysis sessions per month (HD:β = 0.79, ρ < 0.001; ESRD: β = 0.99, ρ < 0.001) significantly increased the patient's out-of-pocket spending on haemodialysis and ESRD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The costs of haemodialysis and managing ESRD patients are high. Providing public subsidies for dialysis and expanding social health insurance coverage for ESRD patients might reduce the costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10704650/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138803163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Methodology and results of cost-effectiveness of LDL-C lowering with evolocumab in patients with acute myocardial infarction in China. 中国急性心肌梗死患者使用evolocumab降低LDL-C的方法学和成本-效果结果
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-023-00501-4
Yuansheng Wan, Jinyu Liu, Xiaolian Zhan, Yu Zhang, Ruxu You

Background: According to the Chinese guidelines for lipid management (2023), evolocumab in combination with statins was recommended as secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, because of the variation in the price of evolocumab and its different methods of confirming clinical efficacy, it was necessary to explore its economics and the impact of different methods of confirming efficacy on its economic studies.

Objective: The purpose of this paper was to assess the cost-effectiveness of evolocumab with statins versus statins alone for patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI) in China and to investigate the impact of different clinical effectiveness modeling approaches on economic outcomes.

Methods: A Markov cohort state-transition model was used to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) based on Chinese observational data on cardiovascular event rates, efficacy from the Asian subgroup of the FOURIER trial, cost and utility from the Chinese Yearbook of Health Statistics, health insurance data, and published studies conducted in China. This study conducted subgroup analyses for different populations and dosing regimens; sensitivity analyses for parameters such as cost, utility, and cardiovascular event rates; and scenario analyses on hospital hierarchy, time horizon, starting age, and price for statins.

Results: ICERs ranged from 27423 to 214777 Chinese yuan(CNY) per QALY gained, all below the willingness-to-pay threshold of CNY 257094. Only when the time horizon became small, the ICERs were greater than the willingness-to-pay. The probabilities that adding evolocumab to statins was cost-effective ranged from 76 to 98%. When the time horizon became small, i.e. evolocumab was discontinued before the age of 75 (after conversion), the corresponding ICERs were almost always greater than the willingness-to-pay. ICERs for modelling approaches based on clinical endpoints were 1.34 to 1.95 times higher than ICERs for modelling approaches based on reduced LDL-C levels.

Conclusions: From the Chinese healthcare and private payer perspectives, adding evolocumab to statin therapy in AMI patients is more likely to be a cost-effective treatment option at the current list price of CNY 283.8. However, evolocumab may not be cost-effective if used for shorter periods of time. The results based on different clinical effectiveness modeling approaches were significantly different.

背景:根据中国脂质管理指南(2023),evolocumab联合他汀类药物被推荐作为心血管疾病的二级预防。然而,由于evolocumab价格的差异以及临床疗效确认方法的不同,有必要探讨其经济性以及不同疗效确认方法对其经济性研究的影响。目的:本文的目的是评估中国急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者使用evolocumab联合他汀类药物与单独使用他汀类药物的成本效益,并探讨不同临床疗效建模方法对经济结果的影响。方法:基于中国心血管事件发生率的观察数据、FOURIER试验亚洲亚组的疗效、中国卫生统计年鉴的成本和效用、医疗保险数据和在中国发表的研究,使用马尔可夫队列状态转移模型来估计增量成本-效果比(ICER)。该研究对不同人群和给药方案进行了亚组分析;对成本、效用和心血管事件发生率等参数的敏感性分析;并对他汀类药物的医院等级、时间范围、起始年龄和价格进行情景分析。结果:ICERs为27423 ~ 214777元/ QALY,均低于257094元/ QALY的支付意愿阈值。只有当时间范围变小时,ICERs才会大于支付意愿。在他汀类药物中加入evolocumab具有成本效益的概率在76%到98%之间。当时间跨度变小,即在75岁之前(转换后)停用evolocumab时,相应的ICERs几乎总是大于支付意愿。基于临床终点的建模方法的ICERs比基于降低LDL-C水平的建模方法的ICERs高1.34至1.95倍。结论:从中国医疗保健和私人付款人的角度来看,在AMI患者的他汀类药物治疗中加入evolocumab更有可能是一种具有成本效益的治疗选择,目前的定价为283.8元人民币。然而,evolocumab如果使用时间较短,可能不具有成本效益。不同临床疗效建模方法的结果有显著性差异。
{"title":"Methodology and results of cost-effectiveness of LDL-C lowering with evolocumab in patients with acute myocardial infarction in China.","authors":"Yuansheng Wan, Jinyu Liu, Xiaolian Zhan, Yu Zhang, Ruxu You","doi":"10.1186/s12962-023-00501-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12962-023-00501-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>According to the Chinese guidelines for lipid management (2023), evolocumab in combination with statins was recommended as secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, because of the variation in the price of evolocumab and its different methods of confirming clinical efficacy, it was necessary to explore its economics and the impact of different methods of confirming efficacy on its economic studies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this paper was to assess the cost-effectiveness of evolocumab with statins versus statins alone for patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI) in China and to investigate the impact of different clinical effectiveness modeling approaches on economic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Markov cohort state-transition model was used to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) based on Chinese observational data on cardiovascular event rates, efficacy from the Asian subgroup of the FOURIER trial, cost and utility from the Chinese Yearbook of Health Statistics, health insurance data, and published studies conducted in China. This study conducted subgroup analyses for different populations and dosing regimens; sensitivity analyses for parameters such as cost, utility, and cardiovascular event rates; and scenario analyses on hospital hierarchy, time horizon, starting age, and price for statins.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ICERs ranged from 27423 to 214777 Chinese yuan(CNY) per QALY gained, all below the willingness-to-pay threshold of CNY 257094. Only when the time horizon became small, the ICERs were greater than the willingness-to-pay. The probabilities that adding evolocumab to statins was cost-effective ranged from 76 to 98%. When the time horizon became small, i.e. evolocumab was discontinued before the age of 75 (after conversion), the corresponding ICERs were almost always greater than the willingness-to-pay. ICERs for modelling approaches based on clinical endpoints were 1.34 to 1.95 times higher than ICERs for modelling approaches based on reduced LDL-C levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From the Chinese healthcare and private payer perspectives, adding evolocumab to statin therapy in AMI patients is more likely to be a cost-effective treatment option at the current list price of CNY 283.8. However, evolocumab may not be cost-effective if used for shorter periods of time. The results based on different clinical effectiveness modeling approaches were significantly different.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10690971/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138470979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A systematic literature review on direct and indirect costs of triple-negative breast cancer. 三阴性乳腺癌的直接和间接费用的系统文献综述。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-023-00503-2
Sadeq Rezaei, Majid Babaei

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive and therapy-resistant form of breast cancer with a significant economic burden on patients and healthcare systems. Therefore, we completed a systematic review to classify and synthesize the literature on the direct and indirect costs of TNBC.

Methods: Databases including ISI Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar were searched for all related articles assessing the economic burden of TNBC from 2010 until December 2022. The quality and eligibility assessments were done accordingly. We adjusted all costs to January 2023 $US.

Results: From 881 records, 15 studies were eligible. We found that studies are widely disparate in the timetable, study design, patient populations, and cost components assessed. The annual per-patient direct costs of metastatic TNBC (mTNBC) were about $24,288 to $316,800. For early TNCB patients (eTNBC) this was about $21,120 to $105,600. Cancer management anticancer therapy costs account for the majority of direct costs. Along with an increase in cancer stage and line of therapy, healthcare costs were increased. Moreover, the indirect costs of patients with mTNBC and eTNBC were about $1060.875 and about $186,535 for each patient respectively.

Conclusion: The results showed that the direct and indirect costs of TNBC, mainly those of mTNBC, were substantial, suggesting attention to medical progress in cancer prognosis and therapy approaches.

背景:三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)是一种侵袭性和治疗耐药的乳腺癌,给患者和医疗保健系统带来了巨大的经济负担。因此,我们对TNBC的直接成本和间接成本的文献进行了系统的分类和综合。方法:检索2010年至2022年12月ISI Web of Science、Scopus、PubMed、Google Scholar等数据库中评估TNBC经济负担的所有相关文章。据此进行了质量和资格评估。我们将所有费用调整为2023年1月$US。结果:从881份记录中,有15项研究符合条件。我们发现研究在时间表、研究设计、患者群体和评估的成本组成方面存在很大差异。转移性TNBC (mTNBC)的年度每位患者直接费用约为24288美元至316800美元。对于早期TNCB患者(eTNBC),这一数字约为21,120至105,600美元。癌症管理、抗癌治疗费用占直接费用的大部分。随着癌症分期和治疗方法的增加,医疗保健费用也增加了。此外,mTNBC和eTNBC患者的间接成本分别约为每位患者10600.875美元和186535美元。结论:TNBC(以mTNBC为主)的直接和间接成本较高,应重视肿瘤预后和治疗方法的医学进展。
{"title":"A systematic literature review on direct and indirect costs of triple-negative breast cancer.","authors":"Sadeq Rezaei, Majid Babaei","doi":"10.1186/s12962-023-00503-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12962-023-00503-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive and therapy-resistant form of breast cancer with a significant economic burden on patients and healthcare systems. Therefore, we completed a systematic review to classify and synthesize the literature on the direct and indirect costs of TNBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases including ISI Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar were searched for all related articles assessing the economic burden of TNBC from 2010 until December 2022. The quality and eligibility assessments were done accordingly. We adjusted all costs to January 2023 $US.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 881 records, 15 studies were eligible. We found that studies are widely disparate in the timetable, study design, patient populations, and cost components assessed. The annual per-patient direct costs of metastatic TNBC (mTNBC) were about $24,288 to $316,800. For early TNCB patients (eTNBC) this was about $21,120 to $105,600. Cancer management anticancer therapy costs account for the majority of direct costs. Along with an increase in cancer stage and line of therapy, healthcare costs were increased. Moreover, the indirect costs of patients with mTNBC and eTNBC were about $1060.875 and about $186,535 for each patient respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results showed that the direct and indirect costs of TNBC, mainly those of mTNBC, were substantial, suggesting attention to medical progress in cancer prognosis and therapy approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10688084/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138463550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cost-effectiveness of abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy in high-risk HR+/HER2-early breast cancer in China. abemaciclib联合内分泌治疗高危HR+/ her2早期乳腺癌的成本-效果
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-023-00499-9
Qiran Wei, YuTing Xu, Wei Liu, Xin Guan

Objective: The aim of this article is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy (ABE + ET) vs. ET as adjuvant treatment for high-risk hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer in China.

Methods: From the perspective of the Chinese health care system, a 5-state Markov model was developed with a lifetime horizon. Data of the monarchE phase III clinical trial were used to model the invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and standard parameters models were used for data extrapolation. Costs were obtained from national data sources, expert opinions and published literature using 2023 US dollars and discounted by 5%. The results were evaluated in terms of life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were performed to test the robustness of the basic results.

Results: In the base-case analysis result, the model projected improved outcomes (by 0.65 LYs and 0.72 QALYs) and increased costs (by $16,057.72) for incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of $24,841/LY and $22,385/QALY for ABE + ET vs. ET patients. The results in scenario analysis estimated the ICERs of ABE + ET treatment to be $16,959/LY and $15,264/QALY in a mixture cure model, and $13,560/LY and $12,191/QALY in a non-mixture cure model. The model was sensitive to outcome discount rate and utility of iDFS.

Conclusion: ABE + ET might not have an economic advantage over ET at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of one time the per capita GDP in China, but was expected to be more cost-effective at a WTP threshold of three times the per capita GDP. Further analysis will be conducted once data from longer-term studies become available.

目的:本文旨在评价阿贝马昔利布联合内分泌治疗(ABE + ET)与ET作为中国高危激素受体阳性和人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HR+/HER2-)早期乳腺癌辅助治疗的成本-效果。方法:从中国医疗卫生系统的角度出发,建立了具有生命视界的五态马尔可夫模型。采用monarchE III期临床试验数据对侵袭性无病生存期(invasive disease-free survival, iDFS)进行建模,采用标准参数模型进行数据外推。成本来源于国家数据来源、专家意见和已发表文献,使用2023美元,折后5%。用生命年(LYs)和质量调整生命年(QALYs)对结果进行评价。进行敏感性分析和情景分析,检验基本结果的稳健性。结果:在基本病例分析结果中,该模型预测ABE + ET与ET患者的增量成本-效果比(ICERs)分别为24,841美元/LY和22,385美元/QALY,改善了结果(0.65 LYs和0.72 QALY),增加了成本(16,057.72美元)。情景分析结果估计,在混合治疗模式下,ABE + ET治疗的ICERs为16,959美元/LY和15,264美元/QALY,而在非混合治疗模式下,ICERs为13,560美元/LY和12,191美元/QALY。该模型对结果贴现率和iDFS的效用敏感。结论:在中国,如果支付意愿(WTP)阈值为人均GDP的1倍,ABE + ET可能不会比ET具有经济优势,但如果WTP阈值为人均GDP的3倍,预计ABE + ET更具成本效益。一旦获得长期研究的数据,将进行进一步的分析。
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy in high-risk HR+/HER2-early breast cancer in China.","authors":"Qiran Wei, YuTing Xu, Wei Liu, Xin Guan","doi":"10.1186/s12962-023-00499-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12962-023-00499-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this article is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy (ABE + ET) vs. ET as adjuvant treatment for high-risk hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From the perspective of the Chinese health care system, a 5-state Markov model was developed with a lifetime horizon. Data of the monarchE phase III clinical trial were used to model the invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and standard parameters models were used for data extrapolation. Costs were obtained from national data sources, expert opinions and published literature using 2023 US dollars and discounted by 5%. The results were evaluated in terms of life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were performed to test the robustness of the basic results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the base-case analysis result, the model projected improved outcomes (by 0.65 LYs and 0.72 QALYs) and increased costs (by $16,057.72) for incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of $24,841/LY and $22,385/QALY for ABE + ET vs. ET patients. The results in scenario analysis estimated the ICERs of ABE + ET treatment to be $16,959/LY and $15,264/QALY in a mixture cure model, and $13,560/LY and $12,191/QALY in a non-mixture cure model. The model was sensitive to outcome discount rate and utility of iDFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ABE + ET might not have an economic advantage over ET at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of one time the per capita GDP in China, but was expected to be more cost-effective at a WTP threshold of three times the per capita GDP. Further analysis will be conducted once data from longer-term studies become available.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683222/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138446578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Health system productivity in sub-Saharan Africa: tuberculosis control in high burden countries. 撒哈拉以南非洲的卫生系统生产力:高负担国家的结核病控制。
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-11-25 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-023-00485-1
Esso-Hanam Atake

Background: Sixteen of the 30 countries with a high tuberculosis (TB) burden are in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Over 25% of TB deaths occur in the Africa region. This study aims to estimate the productivity changes of TB programs in 16 SSA countries where TB is endemic.

Methods: We used Hicks-Moorsteen index to compute and decompose Total factor productivity (TFP), and the β-convergence and σ-convergence tests to check for convergence patterns among SSA countries.

Results: We found that technological change has been the main driver of the TFP growth, and that increasing technical efficiency may be the first objective in efforts to improve TFP of TB programs. Moreover, the convergence tests reveal significant homogeneity in terms of TFP change between SSA countries studied.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that improving technical efficiency of TB programs mainly calls for better resource allocation, capacity building in governance and management of programs, improved training of the health providers and stronger prevention policies. Policymakers must design models for integration of TB treatment under the universal health insurance schemes.

背景:30个结核病高负担国家中有16个位于撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)。25%以上的结核病死亡发生在非洲区域。本研究旨在估计结核病流行的16个撒哈拉以南非洲国家结核病规划的生产力变化。方法:采用Hicks-Moorsteen指数对全要素生产率(TFP)进行计算和分解,并通过β-收敛和σ-收敛检验检验SSA国家间的收敛模式。结果:我们发现,技术变革是TFP增长的主要驱动力,提高技术效率可能是提高结核病项目TFP的首要目标。此外,收敛检验表明,在研究的SSA国家之间,TFP变化具有显著的同质性。结论:研究结果表明,提高结核病规划的技术效率主要需要改善资源配置、规划治理和管理能力建设、改进卫生服务提供者培训和加强预防政策。决策者必须设计将结核病治疗纳入全民健康保险计划的模式。
{"title":"Health system productivity in sub-Saharan Africa: tuberculosis control in high burden countries.","authors":"Esso-Hanam Atake","doi":"10.1186/s12962-023-00485-1","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12962-023-00485-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sixteen of the 30 countries with a high tuberculosis (TB) burden are in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Over 25% of TB deaths occur in the Africa region. This study aims to estimate the productivity changes of TB programs in 16 SSA countries where TB is endemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Hicks-Moorsteen index to compute and decompose Total factor productivity (TFP), and the β-convergence and σ-convergence tests to check for convergence patterns among SSA countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that technological change has been the main driver of the TFP growth, and that increasing technical efficiency may be the first objective in efforts to improve TFP of TB programs. Moreover, the convergence tests reveal significant homogeneity in terms of TFP change between SSA countries studied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that improving technical efficiency of TB programs mainly calls for better resource allocation, capacity building in governance and management of programs, improved training of the health providers and stronger prevention policies. Policymakers must design models for integration of TB treatment under the universal health insurance schemes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676588/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138441454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1