首页 > 最新文献

Dyslexia最新文献

英文 中文
Anxiety and depression among Chinese children with and without reading disabilities 中国阅读障碍儿童与非阅读障碍儿童的焦虑与抑郁
IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2021-07-12 DOI: 10.1002/dys.1691
Li-Chih Wang

This study aims to compare anxiety and depression among male and female Chinese children with and without reading disabilities (RDs) and to examine the diverse impacts of anxiety and depression on children's reading comprehension. A total of 132 Chinese children from third to sixth grade living in Taiwan were recruited; half had RD, and the other half were typically developing children. Our results from the first analysis revealed that the anxiety level of female children with RD was significantly higher than that of the other three groups of participants, while the depression level of typically developing children was significantly lower than that of children with RD in general. Additionally, our results regarding the predictive abilities of gender and anxiety for reading comprehension as well as the moderating effect of gender on the ability of anxiety to predict reading comprehension were all statistically significant for the typically developing group but not the RD group. These differences between these two groups were further confirmed by multi-group analysis. Our results enhance the existing knowledge on Chinese children with RD and can increase practitioners' awareness of the possibility of higher levels of anxious and depressive symptoms among these children.

本研究旨在比较中国男性和女性阅读障碍儿童和非阅读障碍儿童的焦虑和抑郁,并探讨焦虑和抑郁对儿童阅读理解的不同影响。共招募了132名在台湾生活的三年级至六年级的中国儿童;其中一半患有RD,另一半是正常发育的儿童。第一组的分析结果显示,女性RD患儿的焦虑水平显著高于其他三组,而典型发育儿童的抑郁水平显著低于一般RD患儿。此外,性别和焦虑对阅读理解的预测能力以及性别对焦虑预测阅读理解能力的调节作用在典型发展组中均有统计学意义,而在发展障碍组中无统计学意义。多组分析进一步证实了两组间的差异。我们的研究结果增强了对中国RD儿童的现有知识,并可以提高从业者对这些儿童可能存在更高水平焦虑和抑郁症状的认识。
{"title":"Anxiety and depression among Chinese children with and without reading disabilities","authors":"Li-Chih Wang","doi":"10.1002/dys.1691","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dys.1691","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aims to compare anxiety and depression among male and female Chinese children with and without reading disabilities (RDs) and to examine the diverse impacts of anxiety and depression on children's reading comprehension. A total of 132 Chinese children from third to sixth grade living in Taiwan were recruited; half had RD, and the other half were typically developing children. Our results from the first analysis revealed that the anxiety level of female children with RD was significantly higher than that of the other three groups of participants, while the depression level of typically developing children was significantly lower than that of children with RD in general. Additionally, our results regarding the predictive abilities of gender and anxiety for reading comprehension as well as the moderating effect of gender on the ability of anxiety to predict reading comprehension were all statistically significant for the typically developing group but not the RD group. These differences between these two groups were further confirmed by multi-group analysis. Our results enhance the existing knowledge on Chinese children with RD and can increase practitioners' awareness of the possibility of higher levels of anxious and depressive symptoms among these children.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"27 3","pages":"355-372"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dys.1691","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39178150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Rapid serial naming: Developmental trajectory and relationship with the Bangor Dyslexia Test in Spanish students 西班牙学生快速序列命名:发展轨迹及其与班戈阅读障碍测验的关系
IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2021-06-09 DOI: 10.1002/dys.1683
Paula Outón, María José Ferraces

This study aimed to analyse the developmental trajectory of the accuracy and speed of naming among dyslexics and developing readers from 1st to 6th grade of primary education. It examined how familiarity with the stimulus influences the performance of different naming tasks in both groups and evaluated the link between naming speed and the Bangor Dyslexia Test. With a descriptive and correlational design, eight naming tasks and the Bangor Dyslexia Test (Miles, 1982; Outón & Suárez, 2010) were administered to a sample of 198 dyslexics and 245 developing readers. The results showed that the dyslexics were slower and more inaccurate in all the naming tasks, compared with the developing readers of the same age. Greater difficulty was observed with the less familiar stimuli. It became evident that naming performance improved with age among both groups of subjects. Finally, a greater number of significant and positive correlations were found between the naming tasks and the Bangor Dyslexia Test in the dyslexic group; the strongest relationship was obtained by naming letters.

本研究旨在分析小学一至六年级阅读困难者与发展中阅读者的命名准确性和速度的发展轨迹。该研究考察了对刺激的熟悉程度如何影响两组学生在不同命名任务中的表现,并评估了命名速度与班戈阅读障碍测试之间的联系。通过描述性和相关性设计,八个命名任务和班戈阅读障碍测试(Miles, 1982;时代,Suárez, 2010)对198名阅读困难患者和245名发展中的读者进行了研究。结果表明,与同龄的阅读发育者相比,阅读困难者在所有命名任务中都表现得更慢、更不准确。对于不太熟悉的刺激,观察到更大的困难。很明显,两组受试者的命名能力都随着年龄的增长而提高。最后,在诵读困难组中,命名任务与班戈诵读困难测验之间存在显著的正相关;最强的关系是通过命名字母获得的。
{"title":"Rapid serial naming: Developmental trajectory and relationship with the Bangor Dyslexia Test in Spanish students","authors":"Paula Outón,&nbsp;María José Ferraces","doi":"10.1002/dys.1683","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dys.1683","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to analyse the developmental trajectory of the accuracy and speed of naming among dyslexics and developing readers from 1st to 6th grade of primary education. It examined how familiarity with the stimulus influences the performance of different naming tasks in both groups and evaluated the link between naming speed and the Bangor Dyslexia Test. With a descriptive and correlational design, eight naming tasks and the Bangor Dyslexia Test (Miles, 1982; Outón &amp; Suárez, 2010) were administered to a sample of 198 dyslexics and 245 developing readers. The results showed that the dyslexics were slower and more inaccurate in all the naming tasks, compared with the developing readers of the same age. Greater difficulty was observed with the less familiar stimuli. It became evident that naming performance improved with age among both groups of subjects. Finally, a greater number of significant and positive correlations were found between the naming tasks and the Bangor Dyslexia Test in the dyslexic group; the strongest relationship was obtained by naming letters.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"27 3","pages":"325-341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dys.1683","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39076749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
“Same, same but different”: The optimal viewing position effect in developmental dyslexia, developmental coordination disorder and comorbid disorders “相同,相同但不同”:发展性阅读障碍、发展性协调障碍及共病障碍的最佳视位效应
IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2021-06-02 DOI: 10.1002/dys.1688
Stéphanie Bellocchi, Stéphanie Ducrot

The optimal viewing position (OVP) effect indicates that words are identified most quickly when the eyes fixate near the word centre in alphabetic languages. In two studies, we tested OVP in typically developing readers and children with developmental dyslexia (DD), developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and with both disorders (DD + DCD), using a variable-viewing-position technique. Study 1 showed that typically developing readers had developed highly automatized procedures of left-to-right attentional scanning resulting in an inverted J-shape VP curve comparable to what is observed in adult readers and that dyslexics showed non-prototypical one. In Study 2, we observed more typical procedures of left-to-right attentional scanning in children with DCD, isolated or comorbid, compared to DD. Moreover, given the absence of significant group differences between children with DD + DCD and children with isolated DD or DCD, our results reinforce the idea that the comorbid condition does not add to the severity of OVP anomalies. We then concluded that OVP atypicalities are specific to children with DD. Finally, we discussed the usefulness of the OVP effect as a clinical tool to identify possible OVP atypicalities that could be specific of some neurodevelopmental disorders (i.e., DD, DCD or DCD + DD).

最佳观看位置(OVP)效应表明,在字母语言中,当眼睛注视在单词中心附近时,识别单词的速度最快。在两项研究中,我们使用可变观看位置技术测试了正常发育的读者和患有发展性阅读障碍(DD)、发展性协调障碍(DCD)以及两种障碍(DD + DCD)的儿童的OVP。研究1表明,正常发展的阅读者已经发展出高度自动化的从左到右的注意力扫描程序,从而产生了一个倒j形的VP曲线,与成人阅读者所观察到的相似,而读写困难的阅读者表现出非原型曲线。在研究2中,我们观察到与DD相比,单独或合并症的DCD儿童的左至右注意扫描过程更典型。此外,考虑到DD + DCD儿童与孤立DD或DCD儿童之间没有显著的组间差异,我们的结果强化了合并症不会增加OVP异常严重程度的观点。最后,我们讨论了OVP效应作为一种临床工具的有用性,可以识别某些神经发育障碍(即DD、DCD或DCD + DD)可能存在的OVP非典征性。
{"title":"“Same, same but different”: The optimal viewing position effect in developmental dyslexia, developmental coordination disorder and comorbid disorders","authors":"Stéphanie Bellocchi,&nbsp;Stéphanie Ducrot","doi":"10.1002/dys.1688","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dys.1688","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The optimal viewing position (OVP) effect indicates that words are identified most quickly when the eyes fixate near the word centre in alphabetic languages. In two studies, we tested OVP in typically developing readers and children with developmental dyslexia (DD), developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and with both disorders (DD + DCD), using a variable-viewing-position technique. Study 1 showed that typically developing readers had developed highly automatized procedures of left-to-right attentional scanning resulting in an inverted <i>J</i>-shape VP curve comparable to what is observed in adult readers and that dyslexics showed non-prototypical one. In Study 2, we observed more typical procedures of left-to-right attentional scanning in children with DCD, isolated or comorbid, compared to DD. Moreover, given the absence of significant group differences between children with DD + DCD and children with isolated DD or DCD, our results reinforce the idea that the comorbid condition does not add to the severity of OVP anomalies. We then concluded that OVP atypicalities are specific to children with DD. Finally, we discussed the usefulness of the OVP effect as a clinical tool to identify possible OVP atypicalities that could be specific of some neurodevelopmental disorders (i.e., DD, DCD or DCD + DD).</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"27 3","pages":"294-311"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dys.1688","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39056379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
The co-occurrence of neurodevelopmental problems in dyslexia 阅读障碍患者神经发育问题的共同发生
IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2021-03-24 DOI: 10.1002/dys.1681
Katarzyna Brimo, Lisa Dinkler, Christopher Gillberg, Paul Lichtenstein, Sebastian Lundström, Jakob Åsberg Johnels

The primary aim of this study was to explore the overlaps between dyslexia and a range of neurodevelopmental disorders and problems (NDPs), specifically symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, atypical sensory perception and developmental coordination disorder. Capitalizing on a population-based sample of twins, secondary aims included estimating the heritability of dyslexia and reporting on the measurement characteristics of the scale used to assess dyslexia. A telephone interview regarding symptoms of dyslexia and other NDPs was conducted with parents of 1,688 nine-year-old twins. The prevalence and the heritability of dyslexia were estimated at 8 and 52%, respectively. The boy: girl ratio was 1.5:1. Results revealed that there was more than an eight-fold increase in (diagnostic proxy) NDPs prevalence in the dyslexia group as compared to typical readers. Quantitatively measured symptoms of inattention, oral language problems and atypical sensory perception significantly predicted dyslexia status in a multivariate analysis. By contrast, ASD-related inflexibility was inversely associated with dyslexia in the multivariate model. In sum, dyslexia often overlaps with other NDPs. The current study provides new knowledge supporting the position to move beyond isolated diagnostic categories into behavioural profiles of co-occurring problems when trying to understand the pattern of strengths and needs in individuals with dyslexia.

本研究的主要目的是探讨阅读障碍与一系列神经发育障碍和问题(ndp)之间的重叠,特别是注意缺陷/多动障碍、自闭症谱系障碍、非典型感觉知觉和发育协调障碍的症状。利用以人口为基础的双胞胎样本,次要目标包括估计阅读障碍的遗传性,并报告用于评估阅读障碍的量表的测量特征。对1,688名9岁双胞胎的父母进行了一次关于阅读障碍和其他ndp症状的电话采访。阅读障碍的患病率和遗传率分别为8%和52%。男女比例为1.5:1。结果显示,与典型读者相比,阅读障碍组的ndp患病率(诊断代理)增加了8倍多。在多变量分析中,定量测量的注意力不集中、口语问题和非典型感觉知觉症状显著预测阅读障碍状态。相反,在多变量模型中,asd相关的不灵活性与阅读障碍呈负相关。总之,阅读障碍经常与其他ndp重叠。当前的研究提供了新的知识,支持在试图理解阅读障碍患者的优势和需求模式时,超越孤立的诊断类别,进入共同发生问题的行为概况。
{"title":"The co-occurrence of neurodevelopmental problems in dyslexia","authors":"Katarzyna Brimo,&nbsp;Lisa Dinkler,&nbsp;Christopher Gillberg,&nbsp;Paul Lichtenstein,&nbsp;Sebastian Lundström,&nbsp;Jakob Åsberg Johnels","doi":"10.1002/dys.1681","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dys.1681","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The primary aim of this study was to explore the overlaps between dyslexia and a range of neurodevelopmental disorders and problems (NDPs), specifically symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, atypical sensory perception and developmental coordination disorder. Capitalizing on a population-based sample of twins, secondary aims included estimating the heritability of dyslexia and reporting on the measurement characteristics of the scale used to assess dyslexia. A telephone interview regarding symptoms of dyslexia and other NDPs was conducted with parents of 1,688 nine-year-old twins. The prevalence and the heritability of dyslexia were estimated at 8 and 52%, respectively. The boy: girl ratio was 1.5:1. Results revealed that there was more than an eight-fold increase in (diagnostic proxy) NDPs prevalence in the dyslexia group as compared to typical readers. Quantitatively measured symptoms of inattention, oral language problems and atypical sensory perception significantly predicted dyslexia status in a multivariate analysis. By contrast, ASD-related inflexibility was inversely associated with dyslexia in the multivariate model. In sum, dyslexia often overlaps with other NDPs. The current study provides new knowledge supporting the position to move beyond isolated diagnostic categories into behavioural profiles of co-occurring problems when trying to understand the pattern of strengths and needs in individuals with dyslexia.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"27 3","pages":"277-293"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2021-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dys.1681","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25521407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26
The association between anxiety and academic performance in children with reading disorder: A longitudinal cohort study 阅读障碍儿童焦虑与学习成绩的关系:一项纵向队列研究
IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2021-03-17 DOI: 10.1002/dys.1680
Bushra Hossain, Stephen Bent, Robert Hendren

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between anxiety and overall academic performance (AP) in children with reading disorder (RD). This two-year longitudinal cohort study included 128 participants (aged 7–14 years) with RD. Anxiety symptoms were evaluated using the School Anxiety Scale – Teacher Report for the first year and the eight-item Spence Children's Anxiety Scale for the second year. AP was assessed by teacher ratings of progress in academic content areas, including reading, writing and math. Teachers completed evaluations every 3 months. We standardized all scores (to z scores). Multivariate linear regression models (adjusting for age, sex and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder symptoms) assessed the association cross-sectionally at each timepoint of survey completion. Repeated measures analysis using mixed models assessed the relationship longitudinally. Results from both univariate and multivariate analyses showed anxiety being significantly negatively associated with AP in children with RD, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Importantly, increased anxiety was significantly associated with reduced AP over time within an individual (adjusted β = −0.22, p = .002). This lends support to screening for anxiety disorders in children with RD. Future research should examine the directionality of this relationship, potential mediators in the pathway and whether interventions to reduce anxiety increase AP.

本研究旨在探讨阅读障碍(RD)儿童焦虑与整体学习成绩(AP)的关系。这项为期两年的纵向队列研究包括128名患有RD的参与者(7-14岁)。第一年使用学校焦虑量表-教师报告评估焦虑症状,第二年使用8项Spence儿童焦虑量表评估焦虑症状。AP是通过教师对包括阅读、写作和数学在内的学术内容领域的进步打分来评估的。教师每3个月完成一次评估。我们将所有分数标准化(到z分数)。多变量线性回归模型(调整年龄、性别和注意缺陷/多动障碍症状)在调查完成的每个时间点对相关性进行横断面评估。使用混合模型的重复测量分析纵向评估了这种关系。单变量和多变量分析的结果显示,在横断面和纵向上,RD患儿的焦虑与AP呈显著负相关。重要的是,随着时间的推移,个体焦虑的增加与AP的降低显著相关(调整后的β = - 0.22, p = 0.002)。这为RD患儿的焦虑障碍筛查提供了支持。未来的研究应检查这种关系的方向性、通路中的潜在介质以及减少焦虑的干预措施是否会增加AP。
{"title":"The association between anxiety and academic performance in children with reading disorder: A longitudinal cohort study","authors":"Bushra Hossain,&nbsp;Stephen Bent,&nbsp;Robert Hendren","doi":"10.1002/dys.1680","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dys.1680","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this study was to examine the association between anxiety and overall academic performance (AP) in children with reading disorder (RD). This two-year longitudinal cohort study included 128 participants (aged 7–14 years) with RD. Anxiety symptoms were evaluated using the School Anxiety Scale – Teacher Report for the first year and the eight-item Spence Children's Anxiety Scale for the second year. AP was assessed by teacher ratings of progress in academic content areas, including reading, writing and math. Teachers completed evaluations every 3 months. We standardized all scores (to <i>z</i> scores). Multivariate linear regression models (adjusting for age, sex and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder symptoms) assessed the association cross-sectionally at each timepoint of survey completion. Repeated measures analysis using mixed models assessed the relationship longitudinally. Results from both univariate and multivariate analyses showed anxiety being significantly negatively associated with AP in children with RD, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Importantly, increased anxiety was significantly associated with reduced AP over time within an individual (adjusted <i>β</i> = −0.22, <i>p</i> = .002). This lends support to screening for anxiety disorders in children with RD. Future research should examine the directionality of this relationship, potential mediators in the pathway and whether interventions to reduce anxiety increase AP.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"27 3","pages":"342-354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2021-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dys.1680","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25500762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
The contribution of individual differences in statistical learning to reading and spelling performance in children with and without dyslexia 统计学习的个体差异对有和无阅读障碍儿童阅读和拼写表现的贡献。
IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2021-02-25 DOI: 10.1002/dys.1678
Merel van Witteloostuijn, Paul Boersma, Frank Wijnen, Judith Rispens

Using an individual differences approach in children with and without dyslexia, this study investigated the hypothesized relationship between statistical learning ability and literacy (reading and spelling) skills. We examined the clinical relevance of statistical learning (serial reaction time and visual statistical learning tasks) by controlling for potential confounds at the participant level (e.g., non-verbal reasoning, attention and phonological skills including rapid automatized naming and phonological short-term memory). A 100 Dutch-speaking 8- to 11-year-old children with and without dyslexia participated (50 per group), see also van Witteloostuijn et al. (2019) for a study with the same participants. No evidence of a relationship between statistical learning and literacy skills is found above and beyond participant-level variables. Suggestions from the literature that the link between statistical learning and literacy attainment, and therefore its clinical relevance, might be small and strongly influenced by methodological differences between studies are not contradicted by our findings.

本研究采用个体差异方法对有和没有阅读障碍的儿童进行研究,调查了统计学习能力和读写(阅读和拼写)技能之间的假设关系。我们通过控制参与者水平上的潜在混淆(例如,非语言推理、注意力和语音技能,包括快速自动命名和语音短期记忆)来检验统计学习(系列反应时间和视觉统计学习任务)的临床相关性。100名说荷兰语的8至11岁儿童参加了这项研究,有或没有阅读障碍(每组50人),另见van Witteloostuijn等人(2019)对相同参与者的研究。没有证据表明统计学习和读写能力之间的关系超出了参与者水平的变量。文献中提出的统计学习和读写能力之间的联系及其临床相关性可能很小,并且受到研究方法差异的强烈影响,这与我们的发现并不矛盾。
{"title":"The contribution of individual differences in statistical learning to reading and spelling performance in children with and without dyslexia","authors":"Merel van Witteloostuijn,&nbsp;Paul Boersma,&nbsp;Frank Wijnen,&nbsp;Judith Rispens","doi":"10.1002/dys.1678","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dys.1678","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Using an individual differences approach in children with and without dyslexia, this study investigated the hypothesized relationship between statistical learning ability and literacy (reading and spelling) skills. We examined the clinical relevance of statistical learning (serial reaction time and visual statistical learning tasks) by controlling for potential confounds at the participant level (e.g., non-verbal reasoning, attention and phonological skills including rapid automatized naming and phonological short-term memory). A 100 Dutch-speaking 8- to 11-year-old children with and without dyslexia participated (50 per group), see also van Witteloostuijn et al. (2019) for a study with the same participants. No evidence of a relationship between statistical learning and literacy skills is found above and beyond participant-level variables. Suggestions from the literature that the link between statistical learning and literacy attainment, and therefore its clinical relevance, might be small and strongly influenced by methodological differences between studies are not contradicted by our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"27 2","pages":"168-186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2021-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dys.1678","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25411492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
Mode effect: An issue of perspective? Writing mode differences in a spelling assessment in German children with and without developmental dyslexia 模式效应:视角问题?有发展性阅读障碍和没有发展性阅读障碍的德国儿童在拼写评估中的写作模式差异
IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2021-02-21 DOI: 10.1002/dys.1675
Stefanie Jung, Korbinian Moeller, Elise Klein, Juergen Heller

Digital technology has an increasing influence on writing processes. In this context, the question arises whether changes in writing mode (i.e., handwriting vs. computer-keyboard typing) also require changes in writing assessments. However, data directly comparing writing mode influences in children with and without developmental writing deficits are scarce. This study investigated the influence of writing mode in German-speaking, typically developing children and children with developmental dyslexia (DD) from two different levels. Results showed on a general level that writing mode influenced overall spelling accuracy, writing time, and self-corrections comparably in children with and without DD. On a rule-specific level, outcomes for writing time and self-corrections substantiated these findings. However, as regards spelling accuracy, a mode effect was only apparent for capitalization, whereas other spelling rules were resistant to writing mode influences. Present findings suggest that a mode effect is present only for typing specific aspects (e.g., capitalization) rather than reflecting a general influence on orthographic principles (e.g., grapheme–phoneme assignment, morphologic principles). These mode-specific aspects seem to comparably affect the writing performance of typically developing children and children with DD. We recommend writing assessments to consider that different writing modes may influence individual spelling rules differently.

数字技术对书写过程的影响越来越大。在这种情况下,出现的问题是,写作模式的改变(即手写与电脑键盘打字)是否也需要改变写作评估。然而,直接比较写作模式对有和无发育性写作缺陷儿童影响的数据很少。本研究从两个不同的层面探讨了写作模式对德语正常发育儿童和发展性阅读障碍儿童的影响。结果显示,在一般水平上,写作模式对有和没有DD的儿童的整体拼写准确性、写作时间和自我纠正的影响是相当的。在特定规则的水平上,写作时间和自我纠正的结果证实了这些发现。然而,就拼写准确性而言,模式效应仅对大写字母有明显影响,而其他拼写规则则不受书写模式的影响。目前的研究结果表明,模态效应只存在于打字的特定方面(例如,大写),而不是反映对正字法原则(例如,字素-音素分配,形态原则)的一般影响。这些特定模式的方面似乎对正常发育儿童和DD儿童的写作表现有相当的影响。我们建议写作评估考虑到不同的写作模式可能对个人拼写规则产生不同的影响。
{"title":"Mode effect: An issue of perspective? Writing mode differences in a spelling assessment in German children with and without developmental dyslexia","authors":"Stefanie Jung,&nbsp;Korbinian Moeller,&nbsp;Elise Klein,&nbsp;Juergen Heller","doi":"10.1002/dys.1675","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dys.1675","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Digital technology has an increasing influence on writing processes. In this context, the question arises whether changes in writing mode (i.e., handwriting vs. computer-keyboard typing) also require changes in writing assessments. However, data directly comparing writing mode influences in children with and without developmental writing deficits are scarce. This study investigated the influence of writing mode in German-speaking, typically developing children and children with developmental dyslexia (DD) from two different levels. Results showed on a general level that writing mode influenced overall <i>spelling accuracy</i>, <i>writing time</i>, and <i>self-corrections</i> comparably in children with and without DD. On a rule-specific level, outcomes for writing time and self-corrections substantiated these findings. However, as regards <i>spelling accuracy</i>, a mode effect was only apparent for capitalization, whereas other spelling rules were resistant to writing mode influences. Present findings suggest that a mode effect is present only for typing specific aspects (e.g., capitalization) rather than reflecting a general influence on orthographic principles (e.g., grapheme–phoneme assignment, morphologic principles). These mode-specific aspects seem to comparably affect the writing performance of typically developing children and children with DD. We recommend writing assessments to consider that different writing modes may influence individual spelling rules differently.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"27 3","pages":"373-410"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2021-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dys.1675","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25392419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Eye Tracking Using Nonverbal Tasks Could Contribute to Diagnostics of Developmental Dyslexia and Developmental Language Disorder 使用非语言任务的眼动追踪有助于诊断发展性阅读障碍和发展性语言障碍
IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2021-02-19 DOI: 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.95561
Z. Bílková, M. Dobias, J. Dolezal, V. Fabián, Helena Havlisova, Jiří Jošt, O. Malinovská
There are not many studies dealing with a comparison of the eye movements of individuals with dyslexia and developmental language disorder (DLD). The aim of this study is to compare the eye movements in the two most common language disorders, dyslexia and DLD and to consider their contribution to diagnostics. In the research the oculomotor test was administered to 60 children with the clinical diagnosis of dyslexia or DLD and 58 typically developing children (controls). The test included a prosaccadic task, antisaccadic task and a nonverbal sequential task with self-regulation of the pace. Controls could be singled out from other two clinical groups by means of the oculomotor imaging. Both of the clinical groups in comparison with the controls were characterized by worse overall performance. Through the employment of the oculomotor it was possible to differentiate between both of the clinical groups. The dyslexics had an overall worse oculomotor performance than the DLD group. The results of the study show that the oculomotor test has the potential to contribute to diagnostics of dyslexia and DLD and the screening of these disorders at pre-school age.
比较阅读障碍和发展性语言障碍(DLD)患者的眼球运动的研究并不多。本研究的目的是比较两种最常见的语言障碍,阅读障碍和DLD的眼球运动,并考虑它们对诊断的贡献。在本研究中,对60名临床诊断为阅读障碍或DLD的儿童和58名正常发育的儿童(对照组)进行了动眼肌测试。测试包括一个原跳跃性任务、一个反跳跃性任务和一个自我调节速度的非语言顺序任务。对照可通过眼动显像从其他两个临床组中分离出来。与对照组相比,两个临床组的总体表现都较差。通过动眼仪的使用,可以区分两组临床患者。诵读困难患者的整体眼部运动表现比DLD组差。研究结果表明,动眼肌测试有可能有助于诊断阅读障碍和DLD,并在学龄前筛查这些疾病。
{"title":"Eye Tracking Using Nonverbal Tasks Could Contribute to Diagnostics of Developmental Dyslexia and Developmental Language Disorder","authors":"Z. Bílková, M. Dobias, J. Dolezal, V. Fabián, Helena Havlisova, Jiří Jošt, O. Malinovská","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.95561","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.95561","url":null,"abstract":"There are not many studies dealing with a comparison of the eye movements of individuals with dyslexia and developmental language disorder (DLD). The aim of this study is to compare the eye movements in the two most common language disorders, dyslexia and DLD and to consider their contribution to diagnostics. In the research the oculomotor test was administered to 60 children with the clinical diagnosis of dyslexia or DLD and 58 typically developing children (controls). The test included a prosaccadic task, antisaccadic task and a nonverbal sequential task with self-regulation of the pace. Controls could be singled out from other two clinical groups by means of the oculomotor imaging. Both of the clinical groups in comparison with the controls were characterized by worse overall performance. Through the employment of the oculomotor it was possible to differentiate between both of the clinical groups. The dyslexics had an overall worse oculomotor performance than the DLD group. The results of the study show that the oculomotor test has the potential to contribute to diagnostics of dyslexia and DLD and the screening of these disorders at pre-school age.","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2021-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42309019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Dyslexia and syllogistic reasoning in adults: Differences in strategy usage 成人阅读障碍和三段论推理:策略使用的差异
IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2021-02-16 DOI: 10.1002/dys.1676
Janette B. Jacobs, Elizabeth J. Newton, James H. Smith-Spark

People with dyslexia have been found to prefer spatial over verbal strategies when performing word-based syllogistic reasoning tasks that require self-generated responses. The current research investigated whether this was also the case for pictorially based syllogisms, when responses were required to either concrete or abstract stimuli, and when multiple-choice answers were presented. Adults with and without dyslexia, matched for non-verbal ability, were presented with sets of isomorphic reasoning problems in which the stimuli were either concrete words, abstract words, concrete shapes or abstract pictograms. As expected, there was no group difference in reasoning accuracy. Unlike previous findings, the adults with dyslexia preferred to use a mixed verbal and spatial strategy and performed better with this strategy, while the individuals without dyslexia preferred a verbal strategy and performed more successfully when employing this strategy. The provision of answer options to facilitate strategic change in individuals with dyslexia is discussed.

有阅读障碍的人在进行基于单词的三段论推理任务时更喜欢空间策略,而不是口头策略,这些任务需要自我生成的反应。目前的研究调查了这是否也适用于基于图像的三段论,当反应被要求面对具体或抽象的刺激时,以及当提出多项选择答案时。在非语言能力匹配的情况下,有阅读障碍和没有阅读障碍的成年人被提出了一组同构推理问题,其中刺激是具体的单词,抽象的单词,具体的形状或抽象的象形图。正如预期的那样,在推理准确性方面没有组间差异。与之前的研究结果不同,患有阅读障碍的成年人更喜欢使用语言和空间混合策略,并且在使用这种策略时表现得更好,而没有阅读障碍的人更喜欢使用语言策略,并且在使用这种策略时表现得更成功。提供的答案选项,以促进战略变化的个人阅读障碍进行了讨论。
{"title":"Dyslexia and syllogistic reasoning in adults: Differences in strategy usage","authors":"Janette B. Jacobs,&nbsp;Elizabeth J. Newton,&nbsp;James H. Smith-Spark","doi":"10.1002/dys.1676","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dys.1676","url":null,"abstract":"<p>People with dyslexia have been found to prefer spatial over verbal strategies when performing word-based syllogistic reasoning tasks that require self-generated responses. The current research investigated whether this was also the case for pictorially based syllogisms, when responses were required to either concrete or abstract stimuli, and when multiple-choice answers were presented. Adults with and without dyslexia, matched for non-verbal ability, were presented with sets of isomorphic reasoning problems in which the stimuli were either concrete words, abstract words, concrete shapes or abstract pictograms. As expected, there was no group difference in reasoning accuracy. Unlike previous findings, the adults with dyslexia preferred to use a mixed verbal and spatial strategy and performed better with this strategy, while the individuals without dyslexia preferred a verbal strategy and performed more successfully when employing this strategy. The provision of answer options to facilitate strategic change in individuals with dyslexia is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"27 2","pages":"153-167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2021-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dys.1676","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25375733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Developmental dyslexia and creativity: A meta-analysis 发展性阅读障碍与创造力:一项元分析
IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Pub Date : 2021-02-14 DOI: 10.1002/dys.1677
Nadyanna M. Majeed, Andree Hartanto, Jacinth J. X. Tan

Despite difficulties in reading and writing, some research suggests that dyslexia may be related to higher levels of creativity. However, this pattern is not consistently observed. The current research sought to ascertain whether individuals with clinically diagnosed dyslexia exhibit higher creativity than controls through a meta-analysis. Fourteen studies that assessed the creativity of 397 individuals with clinically diagnosed dyslexia and 453 controls were reviewed. Random-effects meta-analysis revealed an overall non-significant difference in creativity scores between those with dyslexia and controls. Additionally, method factors such as the type of creativity task and whether intelligence was controlled for, as well as sample-related factors such as gender, did not explain differences in the dyslexia–creativity relationship. Nonetheless, individuals with dyslexia significantly outperformed controls in creativity scores in adult samples, but not in younger child/adolescent samples. Overall, the current findings provide limited support for the idea that individuals with dyslexia are more creative, and that past evidence of this relationship may be limited to adult samples.

尽管阅读和写作有困难,但一些研究表明,阅读障碍可能与更高水平的创造力有关。然而,这种模式并不总是被观察到。目前的研究试图通过荟萃分析确定临床诊断为阅读障碍的个体是否比对照组表现出更高的创造力。14项研究评估了397名临床诊断为阅读障碍的个体和453名对照者的创造力。随机效应荟萃分析显示,失读症患者和对照组的创造力得分总体上没有显著差异。此外,方法因素,如创造性任务的类型和智力是否被控制,以及样本相关因素,如性别,都不能解释阅读障碍与创造力关系的差异。尽管如此,在成人样本中,有阅读障碍的个体在创造力得分上明显优于对照组,但在年幼的儿童/青少年样本中则不然。总的来说,目前的研究结果为有阅读障碍的人更有创造力的观点提供了有限的支持,而且过去这种关系的证据可能仅限于成人样本。
{"title":"Developmental dyslexia and creativity: A meta-analysis","authors":"Nadyanna M. Majeed,&nbsp;Andree Hartanto,&nbsp;Jacinth J. X. Tan","doi":"10.1002/dys.1677","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dys.1677","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite difficulties in reading and writing, some research suggests that dyslexia may be related to higher levels of creativity. However, this pattern is not consistently observed. The current research sought to ascertain whether individuals with clinically diagnosed dyslexia exhibit higher creativity than controls through a meta-analysis. Fourteen studies that assessed the creativity of 397 individuals with clinically diagnosed dyslexia and 453 controls were reviewed. Random-effects meta-analysis revealed an overall non-significant difference in creativity scores between those with dyslexia and controls. Additionally, method factors such as the type of creativity task and whether intelligence was controlled for, as well as sample-related factors such as gender, did not explain differences in the dyslexia–creativity relationship. Nonetheless, individuals with dyslexia significantly outperformed controls in creativity scores in adult samples, but not in younger child/adolescent samples. Overall, the current findings provide limited support for the idea that individuals with dyslexia are more creative, and that past evidence of this relationship may be limited to adult samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"27 2","pages":"187-203"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2021-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dys.1677","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25373383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
期刊
Dyslexia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1