Pub Date : 2022-12-01Epub Date: 2022-04-25DOI: 10.1136/medhum-2021-012328
Grace Halden
Is biology and knowing biological ancestral information essential to the construction of identity? Bioethicist James David Velleman believes this is the case and argues that donor gamete conception is immoral because a portion of genetic heritage will be unknown. Velleman is critical of sperm donation and the absence of a biological father in donor-assisted families. His bioethical work, specifically the 2005 article 'Family History', is oft-cited in articles debating the ethics surrounding gamete donations and diverse family formations. However, I wonder to what extent Velleman's ethical stance is exhibited in contemporary culture? Velleman suggests that innate knowledge of bio-superiority helps readers and audiences appreciate the importance of biological family structures in literature and film; he says, 'When people deny the importance of biological ties, I wonder how they can read world literature with any comprehension' (2005, 369). Velleman understands the stories of Oedipus, Moses, Telemachus and Luke Skywalker as demonstrating a universal cultural comprehension that genetics are essential to identity construction. I adopt Velleman's list of stories and ask if they really can support an antidonation sentiment and suggest that most of the stories actually support diverse family structures. By exploring the significance of story-telling in cultural understandings of family and identity, it is possible to identify the ways in which story-telling can impact how society negotiates complex issues such as assisted reproduction, donor conception and donor industry regulation.
{"title":"Fatherlessness, sperm donors and 'so what?' parentage: arguing against the immorality of donor conception through 'world literature'.","authors":"Grace Halden","doi":"10.1136/medhum-2021-012328","DOIUrl":"10.1136/medhum-2021-012328","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Is biology and knowing biological ancestral information essential to the construction of identity? Bioethicist James David Velleman believes this is the case and argues that donor gamete conception is immoral because a portion of genetic heritage will be unknown. Velleman is critical of sperm donation and the absence of a biological father in donor-assisted families. His bioethical work, specifically the 2005 article 'Family History', is oft-cited in articles debating the ethics surrounding gamete donations and diverse family formations. However, I wonder to what extent Velleman's ethical stance is exhibited in contemporary culture? Velleman suggests that innate knowledge of bio-superiority helps readers and audiences appreciate the importance of biological family structures in literature and film; he says, 'When people deny the importance of biological ties, I wonder how they can read world literature with any comprehension' (2005, 369). Velleman understands the stories of Oedipus, Moses, Telemachus and Luke Skywalker as demonstrating a universal cultural comprehension that genetics are essential to identity construction. I adopt Velleman's list of stories and ask if they really can support an antidonation sentiment and suggest that most of the stories actually support diverse family structures. By exploring the significance of story-telling in cultural understandings of family and identity, it is possible to identify the ways in which story-telling can impact how society negotiates complex issues such as assisted reproduction, donor conception and donor industry regulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47233,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Research","volume":"54 1","pages":"e18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9691809/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85187776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Our anniversary editorial celebrates 60 years of the journal and presents 60 papers, all of them in one virtual issue. We lead with a long commentary on the decadal plan for geography outlined by Steve Turton and Alaric Maude and invite reflection on progress. That crucial agenda paper is followed by editorials from three of our ten virtual issues—these on bushfires, biogeographies, and the inaugural Festschrift for Ruth Fincher. We also feature one of our Antipodean Perspective essays by David Bissell on COVID-19. Thereafter, there are 54 articles from volumes 51 to 60 for readers to engage with. As we launch this celebratory issue, we also flag important changes to the journal: a vibrant new cover; a font change to account for neurodiverse accessibility needs, and a commitment by us to more in the way of webinars, fascinating new papers, and social media engagements. Please enjoy. Photo by Adi Goldstein.