Positive behaviour support is an evidence-based framework for people displaying behaviours that challenge, which is widely used within the United Kingdom. Few studies have investigated the experiences of people with intellectual disability, their family members, and paid staff members who receive positive behaviour support-based interventions from intensive support teams. Individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 adults with intellectual disability, 10 family members and 10 paid staff members who received an intervention based on a Positive Behaviour Support framework from an intensive support team in England. Participants were aged 18–74 years. Semi-structured interviews took place within 4 months of discharge from the service. They were recorded and transcribed. Data was analysed using an Inductive/Deductive Hybrid approach. Initially inductive data analysis was conducted using Thematic Analysis. Subsequent deductive analysis mapped themes onto an existing framework of Positive Behaviour Support. Four overarching themes were created from the data, ‘Developing a therapeutic working relationship’, ‘Access to resources’, ‘Building knowledge, skills and confidence in the present’, and ‘Instilling hope and resilience for the future’. Results were compared with the Positive Behaviour Support framework and areas of convergence and discrepancy were identified. Gathering multi-perspectival data was a strength of this study. Results from interviews largely mapped onto key components of a Positive Behaviour Support framework. Some additional relational factors were identified around developing therapeutic relationships across the system and the importance of instilling hope for change and the future. These factors may have implications for theoretical mechanisms of change and be helpful for clinicians to consider in their practise.
{"title":"Receiving Positive Behaviour Support: The Experiences of People With Intellectual Disability, Their Family, and Staff Members","authors":"Olivia Hewitt, Jon Codd, Peter E. Langdon","doi":"10.1111/jppi.70032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.70032","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Positive behaviour support is an evidence-based framework for people displaying behaviours that challenge, which is widely used within the United Kingdom. Few studies have investigated the experiences of people with intellectual disability, their family members, and paid staff members who receive positive behaviour support-based interventions from intensive support teams. Individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 adults with intellectual disability, 10 family members and 10 paid staff members who received an intervention based on a Positive Behaviour Support framework from an intensive support team in England. Participants were aged 18–74 years. Semi-structured interviews took place within 4 months of discharge from the service. They were recorded and transcribed. Data was analysed using an Inductive/Deductive Hybrid approach. Initially inductive data analysis was conducted using Thematic Analysis. Subsequent deductive analysis mapped themes onto an existing framework of Positive Behaviour Support. Four overarching themes were created from the data, ‘Developing a therapeutic working relationship’, ‘Access to resources’, ‘Building knowledge, skills and confidence in the present’, and ‘Instilling hope and resilience for the future’. Results were compared with the Positive Behaviour Support framework and areas of convergence and discrepancy were identified. Gathering multi-perspectival data was a strength of this study. Results from interviews largely mapped onto key components of a Positive Behaviour Support framework. Some additional relational factors were identified around developing therapeutic relationships across the system and the importance of instilling hope for change and the future. These factors may have implications for theoretical mechanisms of change and be helpful for clinicians to consider in their practise.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"22 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.70032","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145626107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gaston Descamps, Alain Guy Marie Massart, Terry Rizzo, Maria João Campos
This study explores the positive and negative control beliefs of judo teachers toward the inclusion of participants with Intellectual Developmental Disorders (IDDs) in judo classes, employing a qualitative approach to examine the factors influencing these beliefs. Given the global push for inclusivity in sports and physical education as vehicles for inclusion and personal development, understanding these control beliefs is crucial for developing effective inclusive practices. This study engaged 21 judo teachers from Slovenia, Portugal, and France/French Polynesia through structured qualitative interviews focusing on behavioral, control and normative beliefs, based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. The results reveal that positive factors facilitating inclusion comprise additional human assistance, smaller group sizes, specific education and experience in handling disabilities, informed awareness about the participant's condition, and supportive group dynamics. The study also highlights the impact of these factors on teachers' perceived ability to effectively include participants with IDD. The findings suggest that successful inclusion in judo for participants with IDD requires not only physical adjustments and support but also significant attitudinal shifts and educational enhancements among instructors. These insights can contribute to the broader field of inclusive education within physical education and sports, encouraging more targeted training and policy frameworks to promote inclusivity.
{"title":"Barriers to Overcome When Including Participants With Intellectual Developmental Disorders in Judo Classes","authors":"Gaston Descamps, Alain Guy Marie Massart, Terry Rizzo, Maria João Campos","doi":"10.1111/jppi.70029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.70029","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explores the positive and negative control beliefs of judo teachers toward the inclusion of participants with Intellectual Developmental Disorders (IDDs) in judo classes, employing a qualitative approach to examine the factors influencing these beliefs. Given the global push for inclusivity in sports and physical education as vehicles for inclusion and personal development, understanding these control beliefs is crucial for developing effective inclusive practices. This study engaged 21 judo teachers from Slovenia, Portugal, and France/French Polynesia through structured qualitative interviews focusing on behavioral, control and normative beliefs, based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. The results reveal that positive factors facilitating inclusion comprise additional human assistance, smaller group sizes, specific education and experience in handling disabilities, informed awareness about the participant's condition, and supportive group dynamics. The study also highlights the impact of these factors on teachers' perceived ability to effectively include participants with IDD. The findings suggest that successful inclusion in judo for participants with IDD requires not only physical adjustments and support but also significant attitudinal shifts and educational enhancements among instructors. These insights can contribute to the broader field of inclusive education within physical education and sports, encouraging more targeted training and policy frameworks to promote inclusivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"22 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.70029","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145619068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Darren J. Fitzpatrick, Eilish Burke, Rafat Hussain, Stuart Wark, Martin McMahon
Chronic conditions and multimorbidity are prevalent in older people with intellectual disability. International comparisons of disease prevalence may reflect the heterogeneity of healthcare policy internationally and the distinct social histories of different countries. This study sought to determine if differences in patterns of disease prevalence in Ireland and Australia could elucidate effective and deficient aspects of policy and practice in each country. Data from existing and independent national studies in Ireland and Australia were matched on demography and diagnoses. The prevalences of 9 chronic conditions and multimorbidity across and within both jurisdictions were compared. p values were corrected for multiple hypothesis testing. Thyroid disorder, epilepsy and hypertension were more prevalent in Ireland. Arthritis was more prevalent in Australia. In Australia, arthritis, asthma, and thyroid disorder were more common in females. In Ireland, diabetes prevalence was more prevalent in females (11.9 times more likely than in males). The Irish population was 2.7 times more likely to be multimorbid compared to their Australian counterparts. In both countries, females were 2.6 times more likely to be multimorbid than males. The findings of this study offer unique insights into identifying and tracking multimorbidity and serve as a foundation for developing strategies to improve healthcare outcomes for this population. Differences such as increased prevalence rates of hypertension, epilepsy, and thyroid conditions were observed in the Irish cohort. Differences in multimorbidity trends and sex-stratified disease burden, emphasize the need for further investigation into the environmental, diagnostic, and systemic factors that influence outcomes. These findings highlight the differences in disease prevalence and multimorbidity between Ireland and Australia. There is a critical need for improved data harmonization and targeted interventions to address inequalities particularly sex-stratified diseases which disproportionately affect women with intellectual disability.
{"title":"Ageing Across Continents: Insights Into the Physical Health of Older Adults With Intellectual Disability From Ireland and Australia","authors":"Darren J. Fitzpatrick, Eilish Burke, Rafat Hussain, Stuart Wark, Martin McMahon","doi":"10.1111/jppi.70028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.70028","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chronic conditions and multimorbidity are prevalent in older people with intellectual disability. International comparisons of disease prevalence may reflect the heterogeneity of healthcare policy internationally and the distinct social histories of different countries. This study sought to determine if differences in patterns of disease prevalence in Ireland and Australia could elucidate effective and deficient aspects of policy and practice in each country. Data from existing and independent national studies in Ireland and Australia were matched on demography and diagnoses. The prevalences of 9 chronic conditions and multimorbidity across and within both jurisdictions were compared. <i>p</i> values were corrected for multiple hypothesis testing. Thyroid disorder, epilepsy and hypertension were more prevalent in Ireland. Arthritis was more prevalent in Australia. In Australia, arthritis, asthma, and thyroid disorder were more common in females. In Ireland, diabetes prevalence was more prevalent in females (11.9 times more likely than in males). The Irish population was 2.7 times more likely to be multimorbid compared to their Australian counterparts. In both countries, females were 2.6 times more likely to be multimorbid than males. The findings of this study offer unique insights into identifying and tracking multimorbidity and serve as a foundation for developing strategies to improve healthcare outcomes for this population. Differences such as increased prevalence rates of hypertension, epilepsy, and thyroid conditions were observed in the Irish cohort. Differences in multimorbidity trends and sex-stratified disease burden, emphasize the need for further investigation into the environmental, diagnostic, and systemic factors that influence outcomes. These findings highlight the differences in disease prevalence and multimorbidity between Ireland and Australia. There is a critical need for improved data harmonization and targeted interventions to address inequalities particularly sex-stratified diseases which disproportionately affect women with intellectual disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"22 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.70028","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145619067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}