Dina Mostovoy, Merav Ben Natan, Rawan Masarwa, Yaniv Yonai, Yaron Berkovich
Little is known about knowledge and confidence to treat children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) among physicians working in specific medical fields, such as orthopedics and ophthalmology. Understanding the perspectives and preparedness of professionals in these specialties is crucial for improving the quality of care provided to this population. The objective of this study was to compare the ASD knowledge level, perception of difficulties, and readiness to treat children with ASD between physicians in orthopedics and ophthalmology. A quantitative correlational survey methodology was employed. Participants included 202 physicians, with 94 from orthopedics and 108 from ophthalmology. Participants completed a questionnaire based on the “Knowledge about Childhood Autism among Health Workers” survey. Statistical analyses, including correlation and linear regression, were conducted to examine the relationships between variables. Orthopedic physicians exhibited lower ASD knowledge, reported more difficulties, and displayed lower readiness compared to their ophthalmologic counterparts. Handling aggression/destructive behaviors posed a greater challenge for orthopedic professionals, who also treated fewer children with ASD over the past year. Working in ophthalmology emerged as a strong predictor of readiness to treat ASD. Notably, a minority in both groups reported having received ASD-specific training. The study underscores the importance of ASD-specific training for physicians in orthopedics and ophthalmology, emphasizing the need for tailored training programs in distinct medical fields to optimize knowledge and skills for providing effective care to children with ASD.
{"title":"Physicians’ Readiness to Treat Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Focus on Orthopedics and Ophthalmology","authors":"Dina Mostovoy, Merav Ben Natan, Rawan Masarwa, Yaniv Yonai, Yaron Berkovich","doi":"10.1111/jppi.70023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.70023","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Little is known about knowledge and confidence to treat children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) among physicians working in specific medical fields, such as orthopedics and ophthalmology. Understanding the perspectives and preparedness of professionals in these specialties is crucial for improving the quality of care provided to this population. The objective of this study was to compare the ASD knowledge level, perception of difficulties, and readiness to treat children with ASD between physicians in orthopedics and ophthalmology. A quantitative correlational survey methodology was employed. Participants included 202 physicians, with 94 from orthopedics and 108 from ophthalmology. Participants completed a questionnaire based on the “Knowledge about Childhood Autism among Health Workers” survey. Statistical analyses, including correlation and linear regression, were conducted to examine the relationships between variables. Orthopedic physicians exhibited lower ASD knowledge, reported more difficulties, and displayed lower readiness compared to their ophthalmologic counterparts. Handling aggression/destructive behaviors posed a greater challenge for orthopedic professionals, who also treated fewer children with ASD over the past year. Working in ophthalmology emerged as a strong predictor of readiness to treat ASD. Notably, a minority in both groups reported having received ASD-specific training. The study underscores the importance of ASD-specific training for physicians in orthopedics and ophthalmology, emphasizing the need for tailored training programs in distinct medical fields to optimize knowledge and skills for providing effective care to children with ASD.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"22 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.70023","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145197160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lisa Palmqvist, Henrik Danielsson, Pia Käcker, Kristin Alfredsson Ågren
This study explores the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on service experiences of individuals with intellectual disability in Sweden, with a focus on differences between men and women. Using large-scale self-reported survey data from the National User Survey (2017–2022), changes in satisfaction with social services, including daily activity services, group homes and service homes, were analysed. Overall, satisfaction levels remained high, with notable variations between service types and differences between men and women. Satisfaction with daily activity services was reported with a higher score during the pandemic for both men and women, whereas no significant changes were observed for group homes, and satisfaction with service homes was reported with slightly lower scores. Across all service types and questions, men consistently reported a higher satisfaction than women. Women did not report a higher satisfaction than men in any instance, and disparities were particularly evident in aspects related to decision-making and feelings of safety. The findings highlight the pandemic's differential impact on service experiences for men and women with intellectual disability, underlining the importance of addressing sex disparities in service provision. These results have implications for policy and practice, particularly in designing more inclusive and equitable support systems that involve individuals with intellectual disability in decision-making processes and respond to their unique needs during health crises.
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Service Experiences of Individuals With Intellectual Disability in Sweden: Differences Between Men and Women","authors":"Lisa Palmqvist, Henrik Danielsson, Pia Käcker, Kristin Alfredsson Ågren","doi":"10.1111/jppi.70020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.70020","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explores the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on service experiences of individuals with intellectual disability in Sweden, with a focus on differences between men and women. Using large-scale self-reported survey data from the National User Survey (2017–2022), changes in satisfaction with social services, including daily activity services, group homes and service homes, were analysed. Overall, satisfaction levels remained high, with notable variations between service types and differences between men and women. Satisfaction with daily activity services was reported with a higher score during the pandemic for both men and women, whereas no significant changes were observed for group homes, and satisfaction with service homes was reported with slightly lower scores. Across all service types and questions, men consistently reported a higher satisfaction than women. Women did not report a higher satisfaction than men in any instance, and disparities were particularly evident in aspects related to decision-making and feelings of safety. The findings highlight the pandemic's differential impact on service experiences for men and women with intellectual disability, underlining the importance of addressing sex disparities in service provision. These results have implications for policy and practice, particularly in designing more inclusive and equitable support systems that involve individuals with intellectual disability in decision-making processes and respond to their unique needs during health crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"22 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.70020","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144998907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The aim of this study is to explore the experiences of direct staff in managing psychiatric symptoms in people with intellectual disabilities and behaviors of concern in supported accommodation. The study has a quantitative, cross-sectional design using a questionnaire. Data were collected from 197 direct staff members working in supported community-based accommodation using an adapted version of the Checklist of Challenging Behaviour (CCB). The results show that staff experienced slight or moderate difficulty in managing psychiatric symptoms. The ratings were 38% for anxiety, 37% for compulsive behavior, 31% for manic behavior, and 49% for depressive symptoms. Direct staff members in supported accommodation face challenges in managing psychiatric symptoms and require educational training to improve their knowledge and skills. One viable option would be to implement web-based training programs. Further research and evaluation are imperative to improve access to mental health care for individuals with intellectual disabilities.
{"title":"Direct Staff's Experiences in Recognizing and Managing Psychiatric Symptoms in People With Intellectual Disabilities and Behaviour of Concern in Supported Accommodations","authors":"Catrin Johansson, Helena Antonsson","doi":"10.1111/jppi.70021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.70021","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this study is to explore the experiences of direct staff in managing psychiatric symptoms in people with intellectual disabilities and behaviors of concern in supported accommodation. The study has a quantitative, cross-sectional design using a questionnaire. Data were collected from 197 direct staff members working in supported community-based accommodation using an adapted version of the Checklist of Challenging Behaviour (CCB). The results show that staff experienced slight or moderate difficulty in managing psychiatric symptoms. The ratings were 38% for anxiety, 37% for compulsive behavior, 31% for manic behavior, and 49% for depressive symptoms. Direct staff members in supported accommodation face challenges in managing psychiatric symptoms and require educational training to improve their knowledge and skills. One viable option would be to implement web-based training programs. Further research and evaluation are imperative to improve access to mental health care for individuals with intellectual disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"22 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.70021","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144935260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}