首页 > 最新文献

Indian Journal of Urology最新文献

英文 中文
Development of urology in India. 印度泌尿外科的发展。
IF 0.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-30 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_439_25
Narmada Prasad Gupta
{"title":"Development of urology in India.","authors":"Narmada Prasad Gupta","doi":"10.4103/iju.iju_439_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/iju.iju_439_25","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47352,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Urology","volume":"41 4","pages":"239-241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12530740/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145330555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Critical appraisal of a meta-analysis on pelvic lymph node dissection in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. 对肌肉浸润性膀胱癌盆腔淋巴结清扫的荟萃分析的批判性评价。
IF 0.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-30 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_386_25
Sumit Mandal
{"title":"Critical appraisal of a meta-analysis on pelvic lymph node dissection in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.","authors":"Sumit Mandal","doi":"10.4103/iju.iju_386_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/iju.iju_386_25","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47352,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Urology","volume":"41 4","pages":"321-322"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12530737/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145330603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ultraslow versus slow-rate shockwave lithotripsy in the management of renal stone: A randomized controlled trial. 超低与慢速冲击波碎石治疗肾结石:一项随机对照试验。
IF 0.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-30 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_229_25
Jalaram Pachaiyappan, Santosh Kumar, Santhosh Nagasubramanian, T J Nirmal, Rajiv Paul Mukha, Chandrasingh Jeyachandra Berry

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ultraslow shockwave (SW) lithotripsy compared with slow-rate SW lithotripsy (SWL) in the management of renal stones using a common power ramping protocol.

Methods: This randomized trial enrolled patients with solitary renal calculus ≤2 cms between December 2021 and February 2024. Ultraslow lithotripsy (40 patients) was applied at a rate of 30 shocks per minute and slowrate lithotripsy (40 patients) was applied at a rate of 60 shocks per minute. Common power ramping protocol was followed for both the groups. Up to a maximum of three sessions were carried out with follow-up at 3 months after the last session. The primary outcome was the stone-free rate.

Results: The overall stone-free rate (SFR) was 77.5% in the ultraslow arm and 72.5% in the slow-rate arm (P = 0.60). Ultraslow group attained a higher SFR after the first session (37.5% vs. 20%; P = 0.07) with significantly lesser number of shocks (1300 vs. 1500; P < 0.01). Complications were only mild and similar between both the groups (P = 0.06), with a longer treatment duration in the ultraslow group (100 min vs. 50 min; P < 0.01).

Conclusions: In the setting of an electromagnetic lithotripter with a common ramping protocol and equal energy SWs, both ultraslow and slowrate SWL achieved a comparable overall stone-free rate with a similar safety profile. Higher number of patients in the ultraslow arm, almost double that of the slow arm, attained stone-free status after the first session itself with significantly fewer shocks.

简介:本研究旨在评价超低冲击波碎石术(SW)与慢速冲击波碎石术(SWL)在治疗肾结石方面的疗效。方法:该随机试验招募了2021年12月至2024年2月期间≤2 cm的孤立性肾结石患者。超低碎石(40例)以每分钟30次电击的速度进行,慢速碎石(40例)以每分钟60次电击的速度进行。两组均采用了共同的功率递增方案。最多进行了三届会议,并在上届会议后三个月进行后续工作。主要观察指标是无结石率。结果:超慢组总无结石率(SFR)为77.5%,慢速组为72.5% (P = 0.60)。超低电击组在第一次电击后获得更高的SFR (37.5% vs. 20%; P = 0.07),且电击次数显著减少(1300 vs. 1500; P < 0.01)。两组并发症均较轻,且相似(P = 0.06),但超低组治疗时间较长(100 min vs 50 min; P < 0.01)。结论:在电磁碎石机中,采用相同的爬坡方案和等能量的SWL,超低速SWL和慢速SWL都获得了相当的总体脱石率,并且具有相似的安全性。超低速组的患者数量几乎是慢速组的两倍,在第一次治疗后达到无结石状态,电击明显减少。
{"title":"Ultraslow versus slow-rate shockwave lithotripsy in the management of renal stone: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Jalaram Pachaiyappan, Santosh Kumar, Santhosh Nagasubramanian, T J Nirmal, Rajiv Paul Mukha, Chandrasingh Jeyachandra Berry","doi":"10.4103/iju.iju_229_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/iju.iju_229_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ultraslow shockwave (SW) lithotripsy compared with slow-rate SW lithotripsy (SWL) in the management of renal stones using a common power ramping protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized trial enrolled patients with solitary renal calculus ≤2 cms between December 2021 and February 2024. Ultraslow lithotripsy (40 patients) was applied at a rate of 30 shocks per minute and slowrate lithotripsy (40 patients) was applied at a rate of 60 shocks per minute. Common power ramping protocol was followed for both the groups. Up to a maximum of three sessions were carried out with follow-up at 3 months after the last session. The primary outcome was the stone-free rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall stone-free rate (SFR) was 77.5% in the ultraslow arm and 72.5% in the slow-rate arm (<i>P</i> = 0.60). Ultraslow group attained a higher SFR after the first session (37.5% vs. 20%; <i>P</i> = 0.07) with significantly lesser number of shocks (1300 vs. 1500; <i>P</i> < 0.01). Complications were only mild and similar between both the groups (<i>P</i> = 0.06), with a longer treatment duration in the ultraslow group (100 min vs. 50 min; <i>P</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the setting of an electromagnetic lithotripter with a common ramping protocol and equal energy SWs, both ultraslow and slowrate SWL achieved a comparable overall stone-free rate with a similar safety profile. Higher number of patients in the ultraslow arm, almost double that of the slow arm, attained stone-free status after the first session itself with significantly fewer shocks.</p>","PeriodicalId":47352,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Urology","volume":"41 4","pages":"253-259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12530746/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145330497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reused disposable ureteroscopes in retrograde intrarenal surgery: A new concept arises? 在逆行肾内手术中重复使用一次性输尿管镜:一个新概念的出现?
IF 0.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_162_25
Horacio Sanguinetti, Juan Guillermo Ruiz, Maximiliano Lopez Silva, Norberto Bernardo

Introduction: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal lithiasis is widely used, with single-use ureteroscopes offering an excellent option. However, their high cost poses a challenge, prompting consideration of reusing disposable instruments. This study aims to compare stone-free rates (SFR) and complications between reprocessed disposable ureteroscopes and new ones in a multicenter cohort.

Methods: This prospective, observational, multicenter study included patients who underwent RIRS between May 2022 and May 2023 at three centers in Argentina. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 used a brand new disposable ureteroscope and Group 2 used a reprocessed disposable ureteroscope. Stone size, location, stone-free rate, postoperative complications, and subjective evaluations of deflection and vision were analyzed.

Results: Seventy-seven patients were included: 21 in Group 1 and 56 in Group 2. The average stone size was 10.9 mm in Group 1 and 8.6 mm in Group 2 (P = 0.0188). Stone location in the renal pelvis was 42% in Group 1 and 25% in Group 2 (P = 0.406). SFR were 71.4% in Group 1 and 73.2% in Group 2 (P = 0.999). No differences were found regarding the subjective assessment of vision and deflection as evaluated by the surgeons. Postoperative urinary tract infections occurred in 9.5% of Group 1 and 16% of Group 2 (P = 0.717).

Conclusions: Despite the larger stone size in Group 1, the stone-free rate and postoperative infection rates were similar between both groups. Reprocessing disposable instruments does not appear to affect the effectiveness or infection rate of RIRS.

导读:逆行肾内手术(RIRS)广泛应用于肾结石,一次性输尿管镜提供了一个很好的选择。然而,它们的高成本带来了挑战,促使人们考虑重复使用一次性仪器。本研究旨在在多中心队列中比较再加工一次性输尿管镜和新输尿管镜的无结石率(SFR)和并发症。方法:这项前瞻性、观察性、多中心研究纳入了2022年5月至2023年5月在阿根廷三个中心接受RIRS治疗的患者。患者分为两组:1组使用全新的一次性输尿管镜,2组使用重新加工的一次性输尿管镜。分析结石大小、位置、结石游离率、术后并发症、偏转和视力主观评价。结果:共纳入77例患者:1组21例,2组56例。组1平均结石大小为10.9 mm,组2平均结石大小为8.6 mm (P = 0.0188)。组1肾结石发生率为42%,组2肾结石发生率为25% (P = 0.406)。组1的SFR为71.4%,组2为73.2% (P = 0.999)。在外科医生评估的主观视力和偏斜方面没有发现差异。组1术后尿路感染发生率9.5%,组2术后尿路感染发生率16% (P = 0.717)。结论:尽管第一组结石较大,但两组结石清除率和术后感染率相似。一次性器械的再处理似乎不影响RIRS的有效性或感染率。
{"title":"Reused disposable ureteroscopes in retrograde intrarenal surgery: A new concept arises?","authors":"Horacio Sanguinetti, Juan Guillermo Ruiz, Maximiliano Lopez Silva, Norberto Bernardo","doi":"10.4103/iju.iju_162_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/iju.iju_162_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal lithiasis is widely used, with single-use ureteroscopes offering an excellent option. However, their high cost poses a challenge, prompting consideration of reusing disposable instruments. This study aims to compare stone-free rates (SFR) and complications between reprocessed disposable ureteroscopes and new ones in a multicenter cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, observational, multicenter study included patients who underwent RIRS between May 2022 and May 2023 at three centers in Argentina. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 used a brand new disposable ureteroscope and Group 2 used a reprocessed disposable ureteroscope. Stone size, location, stone-free rate, postoperative complications, and subjective evaluations of deflection and vision were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven patients were included: 21 in Group 1 and 56 in Group 2. The average stone size was 10.9 mm in Group 1 and 8.6 mm in Group 2 (<i>P</i> = 0.0188). Stone location in the renal pelvis was 42% in Group 1 and 25% in Group 2 (<i>P</i> = 0.406). SFR were 71.4% in Group 1 and 73.2% in Group 2 (<i>P</i> = 0.999). No differences were found regarding the subjective assessment of vision and deflection as evaluated by the surgeons. Postoperative urinary tract infections occurred in 9.5% of Group 1 and 16% of Group 2 (<i>P</i> = 0.717).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the larger stone size in Group 1, the stone-free rate and postoperative infection rates were similar between both groups. Reprocessing disposable instruments does not appear to affect the effectiveness or infection rate of RIRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":47352,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Urology","volume":"41 3","pages":"216-219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312838/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144776488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Thulium versus holmium: Which is safer for the removal of entombed stents? 铥和钬:对于移除埋地支架哪个更安全?
IF 0.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_6_25
Ruben Crew, Grant Sajdak, Ala'a Farkouh, Kai Wen Cheng, Sikai Song, Ruby Kuang, Tekisha Lindler, Akin S Amasyali, Ali Albaghli, Zhamshid Okhunov, D Duane Baldwin

Introduction: Removal of entombed ureteral stents can be technically challenging, particularly if the stent were to fragment during removal. The purpose of this study was to compare the therapeutic suitability of the thulium fiber laser (TFL) and the holmium laser (HL) in the treatment of entombed stents.

Methods: In this benchtop study, first, the time taken for each laser to transect the stent was recorded in 10 experiments/laser. Next, the force required to break the stent following 5 s of laser contact was measured in 15 randomized experiments/laser. Finally, seven experiments of simulated ureteroscopy on entombed stents were performed per laser. Lasers were operated at 0.8 J, 12 Hz with 270 µm fibers, and 6 Fr stents were utilized. Endpoints included time to release the stent, laser energy, and stent damage.

Results: The stent transection time was shorter with the TFL compared to the HL (22.02 vs. 61.46 s; P < 0.001). After 5 s, the TFL transected the stent with lesser force compared to the HL (5.34 vs. 15.24 N; P = 0.004). Both required lesser force to break the stent compared to the baseline (33.8 N; P < 0.001). On simulated lithotripsy, the lithotripsy time (12.7 vs. 8.5 min; P = 0.11) and laser energy (4.7 vs. 2.7 kJ; P = 0.09) were similar between the TFL and HL. The mean stent damage score was higher when using the TFL compared to the HL (36.9 vs. 15.7; P = 0.017).

Conclusions: The TFL resulted in faster stent transection, reduced breakage force, and greater stent damage. Urologists should be cautious when releasing entombed stents using the TFL as the laser may significantly weaken the stent, increasing the risk of fracture during removal.

导读:埋入式输尿管支架的移除在技术上具有挑战性,特别是如果支架在移除过程中碎裂。本研究的目的是比较铥光纤激光(TFL)和钬激光(HL)治疗埋地支架的适用性。方法:在本台式研究中,首先记录每台激光横切支架所需的时间,每台激光10次。接下来,在15个随机实验/激光中测量激光接触5 s后支架断裂所需的力。最后,进行了7次模拟输尿管镜埋入式支架的实验。激光在0.8 J, 12 Hz, 270µm光纤下工作,使用6个Fr支架。终点包括支架释放时间、激光能量和支架损伤。结果:TFL组支架横断时间较HL组短(22.02 vs 61.46 s;P < 0.001)。5 s后,与HL相比,TFL以较小的力横切支架(5.34比15.24 N;P = 0.004)。与基线(33.8 N;P < 0.001)。在模拟碎石试验中,碎石时间(12.7 vs 8.5 min;P = 0.11)和激光能量(4.7 vs. 2.7 kJ;P = 0.09)。与HL相比,使用TFL的平均支架损伤评分更高(36.9 vs 15.7;P = 0.017)。结论:TFL使支架横断更快,断裂力减小,支架损伤更大。泌尿科医生在使用TFL释放埋入支架时应谨慎,因为激光可能会显著削弱支架,增加移除过程中骨折的风险。
{"title":"Thulium versus holmium: Which is safer for the removal of entombed stents?","authors":"Ruben Crew, Grant Sajdak, Ala'a Farkouh, Kai Wen Cheng, Sikai Song, Ruby Kuang, Tekisha Lindler, Akin S Amasyali, Ali Albaghli, Zhamshid Okhunov, D Duane Baldwin","doi":"10.4103/iju.iju_6_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/iju.iju_6_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Removal of entombed ureteral stents can be technically challenging, particularly if the stent were to fragment during removal. The purpose of this study was to compare the therapeutic suitability of the thulium fiber laser (TFL) and the holmium laser (HL) in the treatment of entombed stents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this benchtop study, first, the time taken for each laser to transect the stent was recorded in 10 experiments/laser. Next, the force required to break the stent following 5 s of laser contact was measured in 15 randomized experiments/laser. Finally, seven experiments of simulated ureteroscopy on entombed stents were performed per laser. Lasers were operated at 0.8 J, 12 Hz with 270 µm fibers, and 6 Fr stents were utilized. Endpoints included time to release the stent, laser energy, and stent damage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stent transection time was shorter with the TFL compared to the HL (22.02 vs. 61.46 s; <i>P</i> < 0.001). After 5 s, the TFL transected the stent with lesser force compared to the HL (5.34 vs. 15.24 N; <i>P</i> = 0.004). Both required lesser force to break the stent compared to the baseline (33.8 N; <i>P</i> < 0.001). On simulated lithotripsy, the lithotripsy time (12.7 vs. 8.5 min; <i>P</i> = 0.11) and laser energy (4.7 vs. 2.7 kJ; <i>P</i> = 0.09) were similar between the TFL and HL. The mean stent damage score was higher when using the TFL compared to the HL (36.9 vs. 15.7; <i>P</i> = 0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TFL resulted in faster stent transection, reduced breakage force, and greater stent damage. Urologists should be cautious when releasing entombed stents using the TFL as the laser may significantly weaken the stent, increasing the risk of fracture during removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":47352,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Urology","volume":"41 3","pages":"205-209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312839/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144776490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Benign metastasizing leiomyoma with retroperitoneal lymph node involvement in a patient with a history of renal cell carcinoma. 一例有肾细胞癌病史的良性转移性平滑肌瘤伴腹膜后淋巴结受累。
IF 0.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_461_24
Alireza Ghoreifi, Richard Mateo Mora, Shivani Kandukuri, Hooman Djaladat

Benign metastasizing leiomyoma (BML) is thought to arise from either coelomic metaplasia of mesenchymal tissue or peritoneal seeding of uterine fibroid tissue, though its exact etiology is unknown. Herein, we present a 44-year-old Hispanic female with BML identified in the retroperitoneum in the setting of clear cell renal carcinoma. Routine follow-up computed tomography scan, 18 months after a robotic left partial nephrectomy for stage 1 renal tumor, revealed retroperitoneal (para-aortic) adenopathy. Percutaneous biopsy followed by robotic lymph node dissection confirmed the presence of BML. The patient remained asymptomatic with unremarkable imaging and laboratories within a 3-year follow-up.

良性转移性平滑肌瘤(BML)被认为是由间质组织的体腔化生或子宫肌瘤组织的腹膜播种引起的,尽管其确切的病因尚不清楚。在此,我们报告一位44岁的西班牙裔女性,在透明细胞肾癌的背景下,在腹膜后发现BML。常规随访计算机断层扫描,在机器人左肾部分切除1期肾肿瘤18个月后,发现腹膜后(主动脉旁)腺病变。经皮活检和机器人淋巴结清扫证实了BML的存在。在3年的随访中,患者无明显的影像学和实验室症状。
{"title":"Benign metastasizing leiomyoma with retroperitoneal lymph node involvement in a patient with a history of renal cell carcinoma.","authors":"Alireza Ghoreifi, Richard Mateo Mora, Shivani Kandukuri, Hooman Djaladat","doi":"10.4103/iju.iju_461_24","DOIUrl":"10.4103/iju.iju_461_24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Benign metastasizing leiomyoma (BML) is thought to arise from either coelomic metaplasia of mesenchymal tissue or peritoneal seeding of uterine fibroid tissue, though its exact etiology is unknown. Herein, we present a 44-year-old Hispanic female with BML identified in the retroperitoneum in the setting of clear cell renal carcinoma. Routine follow-up computed tomography scan, 18 months after a robotic left partial nephrectomy for stage 1 renal tumor, revealed retroperitoneal (para-aortic) adenopathy. Percutaneous biopsy followed by robotic lymph node dissection confirmed the presence of BML. The patient remained asymptomatic with unremarkable imaging and laboratories within a 3-year follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":47352,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Urology","volume":"41 3","pages":"222-224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312831/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144776548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial comment: Is 23-h discharge following robotic radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy feasible and safe in a quaternary care centre in a developing country? 编辑评论:在发展中国家的第四医疗中心,机器人根治性前列腺切除术和部分肾切除术后23小时出院是否可行和安全?
IF 0.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_107_25
Amit Satish Bhattu
{"title":"Editorial comment: Is 23-h discharge following robotic radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy feasible and safe in a quaternary care centre in a developing country?","authors":"Amit Satish Bhattu","doi":"10.4103/iju.iju_107_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/iju.iju_107_25","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47352,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Urology","volume":"41 3","pages":"204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312832/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144776551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial comment: The reusability conundrum: Considerations for reusing surgical disposables in research setting. 编辑评论:可重复使用的难题:在研究环境中重复使用一次性手术用品的考虑。
IF 0.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_222_25
Madhur Anand
{"title":"Editorial comment: The reusability conundrum: Considerations for reusing surgical disposables in research setting.","authors":"Madhur Anand","doi":"10.4103/iju.iju_222_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/iju.iju_222_25","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47352,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Urology","volume":"41 3","pages":"220-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312833/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144776552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Re: Does chatGPT-4.0's awareness of conversing with a urologist affect the accuracy of responses to questions about "sexually transmitted urethritis in men"? 回复:chatGPT-4.0对与泌尿科医生交谈的意识是否会影响对“男性性传播性尿道炎”问题回答的准确性?
IF 0.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_169_25
Hinpetch Daungsupawong, Viroj Wiwanitkit
{"title":"Re: Does chatGPT-4.0's awareness of conversing with a urologist affect the accuracy of responses to questions about \"sexually transmitted urethritis in men\"?","authors":"Hinpetch Daungsupawong, Viroj Wiwanitkit","doi":"10.4103/iju.iju_169_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/iju.iju_169_25","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47352,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Urology","volume":"41 3","pages":"234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312829/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144776486","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Renal sinus lymphangiectasia: An uncommon entity. 肾窦淋巴管扩张:一种罕见的疾病。
IF 0.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_29_25
Divij Agarwal, Pradeep Hatimota, Chandan J Das

Renal lymphangiectasia is a benign disorder characterized by cystic dilatation of lymphatic channels in the kidney. It can occur in the perinephric, renal sinus, and intrarenal locations. We describe an uncommon case of renal sinus lymphangiectasia with a characteristic imaging appearance in a 25-year-old female. She presented with loin pain that was managed conservatively.

肾淋巴管扩张是一种良性疾病,其特征是肾脏淋巴管囊性扩张。它可发生在肾周、肾窦和肾内。我们描述一个罕见的病例肾窦淋巴管扩张与特征性的影像学表现在一个25岁的女性。她表现为腰部疼痛,并进行了保守治疗。
{"title":"Renal sinus lymphangiectasia: An uncommon entity.","authors":"Divij Agarwal, Pradeep Hatimota, Chandan J Das","doi":"10.4103/iju.iju_29_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/iju.iju_29_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Renal lymphangiectasia is a benign disorder characterized by cystic dilatation of lymphatic channels in the kidney. It can occur in the perinephric, renal sinus, and intrarenal locations. We describe an uncommon case of renal sinus lymphangiectasia with a characteristic imaging appearance in a 25-year-old female. She presented with loin pain that was managed conservatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":47352,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Urology","volume":"41 3","pages":"228-229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312840/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144776487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Indian Journal of Urology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1