Advances in Medical Education and Practice最新文献

Introduction: Leaders in healthcare no longer need to hold formal management positions; instead, leadership is perceived to be the responsibility of all healthcare professionals. Despite changes in curricula and teaching design, however, this review of the content taught in medical colleges in Saudi Arabia reveals a lack of leadership and a failure to equip young graduates to compete on the global stage. Medical students need leadership skills for patient care, cooperation, and navigating the complex healthcare system. Clinical management skills in hospitals require these talents also. The complexity of healthcare and the impact healthcare executives have on people's lives highlight the importance of these skills. Thus, healthcare practitioners must develop non-technical skills like proactivity, motivation, and change management to lead across professional boundaries and negotiate the increasingly complex healthcare landscape.

Methods: This cross-sectional study combines a quantitative approach with a self-administered questionnaire-based survey. The sampling procedure is a non-probability convenience technique, adapted for 700 male and female undergraduate medical students from four medical colleges.

Results: Of the students, 75.46% had minimal leadership experience and 22.69% had some leadership experience; 3.02% of 464 students considered themselves highly experienced in leadership.

Conclusion: As the needs assessment and other relevant factors show, leadership should be introduced as a skilled subject. There will always be a growing demand for competent medical graduates, who are capable of becoming future leaders. Although elementary leadership concepts remain fundamentally the same, curricular development must focus on the needs of society and stakeholders.

Background: There is growing need for physician-innovators to address the mounting challenges within the US healthcare system. Despite this, there remains a significant gap in understanding of the efficacy of innovation programs for US MD candidates. We present initial program outcomes of a novel, clinically immersive medical innovation program offered to MD candidates at the David Geffen School of Medicine (DGSOM) at UCLA.

Methods: A novel clinically immersive medical innovation curriculum was developed based on existing and reputable medical innovation frameworks and tailored for medical students. Curricular topics broadly included clinical ethnography, interviewing techniques, mind mapping, needs formulation and prioritization, quality improvement, intellectual property, reimbursement pathways, solution landscaping and prioritization, regulatory processes. The program was trialed during an unscheduled summer with voluntary enrollees from DGSOM Class of 2024. The traditional four-level Kirkpatrick model was employed to assess program outcomes.

Results: Program outcomes were positive on all four Kirkpatrick levels. Students rated enjoyment at 9.5/10 for lectures and 9.1/10 for clinical immersion. Student-perceived confidence in key skills increased by 43%, and 75% of faculty directly perceived improvement in ethnographic skills. Students were highly engaged in both didactics and clinical immersion, discovering on average 2.6 faculty-verified needs per week. Faculty largely felt their students discovered important unmet clinical needs and added value to their clinical practice.

Conclusion: We developed and trialed a novel clinically immersive medical innovation curriculum tailored for medical students. This program achieved positive outcomes on all four levels of the Kirkpatrick model. Our findings have driven the local adoption of this program into our institution's medical school curriculum. We hope that the program efficacy demonstrated herein catalyzes more institutions to trial similar medical innovation programs.