首页 > 最新文献

Nurse Researcher最新文献

英文 中文
How my CAR-T therapy research seeks to improve cancer care and empower nurses 我的CAR-T治疗研究如何寻求改善癌症护理并赋予护士权力
IF 1.2 Q3 NURSING Pub Date : 2022-06-07 DOI: 10.7748/nr.30.2.6.s2
E. Williams
No one could have prepared nurses for the widespread destruction that COVID-19 would have on our health organisations with our whole way of working literally changing overnight.
没有人能让护士为新冠肺炎对我们的卫生组织造成的广泛破坏做好准备,因为我们的整个工作方式一夜之间发生了变化。
{"title":"How my CAR-T therapy research seeks to improve cancer care and empower nurses","authors":"E. Williams","doi":"10.7748/nr.30.2.6.s2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.30.2.6.s2","url":null,"abstract":"No one could have prepared nurses for the widespread destruction that COVID-19 would have on our health organisations with our whole way of working literally changing overnight.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49470176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What have we learned from the pandemic? 我们从新冠疫情中学到了什么?
IF 1.2 Q3 NURSING Pub Date : 2022-06-07 DOI: 10.7748/nr.30.2.5.s1
L. Halcomb
What have researchers learned from the COVID-19 pandemic? In mid-2022 we are in a world that has changed significantly from the pre-pandemic period. Our communities have been affected by social isolation, physical distancing, and changes to employment. For nurses and midwives, the psychological toll of the loss of loved ones and colleagues, as well as caring for the dying will leave a lasting mark.
研究人员从新冠肺炎大流行中学到了什么?2022年年中,我们所处的世界与疫情前相比发生了重大变化。我们的社区受到了社会孤立、物理距离和就业变化的影响。对于护士和助产士来说,失去亲人和同事以及照顾垂死的人所造成的心理损失将留下持久的印记。
{"title":"What have we learned from the pandemic?","authors":"L. Halcomb","doi":"10.7748/nr.30.2.5.s1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.30.2.5.s1","url":null,"abstract":"What have researchers learned from the COVID-19 pandemic? In mid-2022 we are in a world that has changed significantly from the pre-pandemic period. Our communities have been affected by social isolation, physical distancing, and changes to employment. For nurses and midwives, the psychological toll of the loss of loved ones and colleagues, as well as caring for the dying will leave a lasting mark.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42955824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of COVID-19 on doctoral research: adapting to the challenges and the opportunities of disruption. COVID-19对博士研究的影响:适应中断带来的挑战和机遇。
IF 1.2 Q3 NURSING Pub Date : 2022-06-07 Epub Date: 2022-03-24 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2022.e1839
Karen Evans

Background: The author is a professional doctorate student and full-time nurse in an education role in a UK NHS Trust. COVID-19 caused a major disruption to her research, which focused on nursing workforce development in primary care. She received ethical approval for the research in February 2020 and had just begun to collect data as the country entered its first period of lockdown and all activity not related directly to COVID-19 was sidelined.

Aim: To share the author's reflections on this experience and make recommendations that may help others whose research is disrupted.

Discussion: The author had not considered in her plans the disruption that would be caused by COVID-19, but she adapted her study's design to minimise some of its effects and also discovered some new opportunities.

Conclusion: Nurse researchers whose studies are disrupted can adapt to overcome the challenges and try to find new opportunities.

Implications for practice: The author hopes that sharing her reflections will encourage other nurse researchers who face unexpected disruptions to their research.

背景:作者是一个专业的博士生和全职护士在英国NHS信托教育的作用。COVID-19对她的研究造成了重大干扰,她的研究重点是初级保健护理人员的发展。她于2020年2月获得了这项研究的伦理批准,并且刚刚开始收集数据,因为该国进入了第一个封锁期,所有与COVID-19不直接相关的活动都被排除在一边。目的:分享作者对这一经历的反思,并提出建议,以帮助那些研究受到干扰的人。讨论:作者在她的计划中没有考虑到COVID-19可能造成的破坏,但她调整了她的研究设计,以尽量减少其影响,并发现了一些新的机会。结论:学习中断的护理科研人员能够适应挑战,努力寻找新的机会。对实践的启示:作者希望分享她的反思将鼓励其他护士研究人员谁面临意想不到的干扰,他们的研究。
{"title":"The impact of COVID-19 on doctoral research: adapting to the challenges and the opportunities of disruption.","authors":"Karen Evans","doi":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1839","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2022.e1839","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The author is a professional doctorate student and full-time nurse in an education role in a UK NHS Trust. COVID-19 caused a major disruption to her research, which focused on nursing workforce development in primary care. She received ethical approval for the research in February 2020 and had just begun to collect data as the country entered its first period of lockdown and all activity not related directly to COVID-19 was sidelined.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To share the author's reflections on this experience and make recommendations that may help others whose research is disrupted.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The author had not considered in her plans the disruption that would be caused by COVID-19, but she adapted her study's design to minimise some of its effects and also discovered some new opportunities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurse researchers whose studies are disrupted can adapt to overcome the challenges and try to find new opportunities.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>The author hopes that sharing her reflections will encourage other nurse researchers who face unexpected disruptions to their research.</p>","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":" ","pages":"8-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40318515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Being reflexive in research and clinical practice: a practical example. 研究和临床实践中的反思性:一个实际的例子。
IF 1.2 Q3 NURSING Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2022.e1833
Wendy English, M. Gott, Jackie Robinson
BACKGROUNDReflexivity is an invaluable skill for nurses and researchers, as it assists in closing the gap between research and practice and improves nursing practice. However, there is some doubt about how well reflexivity is implemented in nursing. There has also been little published showing how reflexivity can be applied in research and nursing.AIMTo provide an example of reflexivity in research to demonstrate that knowledge and experiences are transferable to nursing practice.DISCUSSIONReflexivity is an important tool for research and nursing in finding the meeting points or interface of research and practice. This article provides an example of being reflexive that identified how the research skills of 'listening to understand' and 'finding meaning' filtered into nursing practice.CONCLUSIONReflexivity helped to generate knowledge about research skills filtering across a research project into clinical practice. Being reflexive as a researcher and a nurse can transform the care of patients and families.IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICEThis article provides an example of how reflexivity can be applied to research and nursing practice. It also suggests reframing the gap between research and practice as an interface between the two. This could encourage nurses to think of research skills and knowledge as transferable into real-time nursing practice.
对于护士和研究人员来说,灵活性是一项宝贵的技能,因为它有助于缩小研究与实践之间的差距,并改善护理实践。然而,对于反身性在护理中的实施情况,存在一些疑问。也几乎没有发表过关于如何将反射性应用于研究和护理的文章。目的提供一个反身性研究的例子,以证明知识和经验可转移到护理实践中。讨论反身性是研究和护理寻找研究与实践交汇点或界面的重要工具。这篇文章提供了一个反身性的例子,说明了“倾听理解”和“发现意义”的研究技能是如何渗透到护理实践中的。结论反身性有助于产生关于研究技能的知识,这些知识通过研究项目过滤进入临床实践。作为一名研究人员和护士,自反性可以改变对病人和家属的护理。这篇文章提供了一个反身性如何应用于研究和护理实践的例子。它还建议将研究与实践之间的差距重新定义为两者之间的接口。这可以鼓励护士将研究技能和知识转化为实时护理实践。
{"title":"Being reflexive in research and clinical practice: a practical example.","authors":"Wendy English, M. Gott, Jackie Robinson","doi":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1833","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2022.e1833","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000Reflexivity is an invaluable skill for nurses and researchers, as it assists in closing the gap between research and practice and improves nursing practice. However, there is some doubt about how well reflexivity is implemented in nursing. There has also been little published showing how reflexivity can be applied in research and nursing.\u0000\u0000\u0000AIM\u0000To provide an example of reflexivity in research to demonstrate that knowledge and experiences are transferable to nursing practice.\u0000\u0000\u0000DISCUSSION\u0000Reflexivity is an important tool for research and nursing in finding the meeting points or interface of research and practice. This article provides an example of being reflexive that identified how the research skills of 'listening to understand' and 'finding meaning' filtered into nursing practice.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000Reflexivity helped to generate knowledge about research skills filtering across a research project into clinical practice. Being reflexive as a researcher and a nurse can transform the care of patients and families.\u0000\u0000\u0000IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE\u0000This article provides an example of how reflexivity can be applied to research and nursing practice. It also suggests reframing the gap between research and practice as an interface between the two. This could encourage nurses to think of research skills and knowledge as transferable into real-time nursing practice.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48856217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
The changing paradigm of research delivery during a pandemic - a reflective account. 疫情期间研究交付模式的变化——反思性叙述。
IF 1.2 Q3 NURSING Pub Date : 2022-05-12 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2022.e1832
C. Whitehouse, C. Harris, P. Charlton, Naomi Hare
BACKGROUNDAs clinical pressures evolved amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the importance of research activity came to the forefront of health and care service requirements.AIMTo illustrate through reflection the experiences of clinical research teams based in the UK during the pandemic.DISCUSSIONThe article describes operational experiences in different settings and reflects on important themes and implications for future practice. The authors use a reflective model to share perspectives of leading research delivery roles in geographically and organisationally different settings. A patient's perspective was included from the outset of the reflective process. Delegates at an interactive masterclass conference in April 2021 also contributed their experiences. Seven themes characterise the research teams' response to the pandemic: prioritising, team-building, protection, limitation of autonomy, reduced bureaucracy, collaboration and transformation of process. Balance through compassionate leadership underpinned by ethically grounded decision-making was a theme throughout.CONCLUSIONImplicitly held, tacit knowledge progressed to explicit knowledge, formalising the research teams' responses to the pandemic partly into codified learning. The authors characterise the experience as an 'operational balancing act', whereby significant innovations were integrated into working practices and research delivery.IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICEThe pandemic demonstrated what research progress is possible when all resources are diverted to one novel virus. The value of research teams was elevated through treatment and vaccine trials and the contribution of those involved to patient care. This reinforces an invigorated commitment to resources as well as new acceptance of and belief in research as a core care activity across and throughout systems and organisations at all levels.
背景随着新冠肺炎大流行期间临床压力的演变,研究活动的重要性成为卫生和护理服务要求的前沿。目的通过反思来说明英国临床研究团队在疫情期间的经验。讨论这篇文章描述了在不同环境中的操作经验,并反思了重要的主题和对未来实践的影响。作者使用一个反思模型来分享在地理和组织不同环境中领导研究交付角色的观点。从反思过程的一开始就包含了患者的观点。在2021年4月的一次互动大师班会议上,代表们也分享了他们的经验。研究团队应对疫情的七个主题是:优先次序、团队建设、保护、限制自主权、减少官僚主义、协作和流程转型。通过富有同情心的领导,以合乎道德的决策为基础,实现平衡是贯穿始终的主题。结论隐性知识发展为显性知识,使研究团队对疫情的反应部分正式化为成文学习。作者将这段经历描述为一种“操作平衡行为”,将重大创新融入工作实践和研究交付中。对实践的启示疫情表明,当所有资源都转移到一种新型病毒上时,研究进展是可能的。通过治疗和疫苗试验以及参与患者护理的人员的贡献,研究团队的价值得到了提升。这加强了对资源的积极承诺,以及对研究作为各级系统和组织的核心护理活动的新接受和信念。
{"title":"The changing paradigm of research delivery during a pandemic - a reflective account.","authors":"C. Whitehouse, C. Harris, P. Charlton, Naomi Hare","doi":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1832","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2022.e1832","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000As clinical pressures evolved amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the importance of research activity came to the forefront of health and care service requirements.\u0000\u0000\u0000AIM\u0000To illustrate through reflection the experiences of clinical research teams based in the UK during the pandemic.\u0000\u0000\u0000DISCUSSION\u0000The article describes operational experiences in different settings and reflects on important themes and implications for future practice. The authors use a reflective model to share perspectives of leading research delivery roles in geographically and organisationally different settings. A patient's perspective was included from the outset of the reflective process. Delegates at an interactive masterclass conference in April 2021 also contributed their experiences. Seven themes characterise the research teams' response to the pandemic: prioritising, team-building, protection, limitation of autonomy, reduced bureaucracy, collaboration and transformation of process. Balance through compassionate leadership underpinned by ethically grounded decision-making was a theme throughout.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000Implicitly held, tacit knowledge progressed to explicit knowledge, formalising the research teams' responses to the pandemic partly into codified learning. The authors characterise the experience as an 'operational balancing act', whereby significant innovations were integrated into working practices and research delivery.\u0000\u0000\u0000IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE\u0000The pandemic demonstrated what research progress is possible when all resources are diverted to one novel virus. The value of research teams was elevated through treatment and vaccine trials and the contribution of those involved to patient care. This reinforces an invigorated commitment to resources as well as new acceptance of and belief in research as a core care activity across and throughout systems and organisations at all levels.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42010619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perspectives on reporting non-verbal interactions from the contemporary research focus group. 当代研究焦点小组对报告非语言互动的看法。
IF 1.2 Q3 NURSING Pub Date : 2022-04-07 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2022.e1828
Iseult M. Wilson, Nikki Daniels, P. Gillen, K. Casson
BACKGROUNDThe main defining attribute that delineates focus groups from other methods of collecting data is that data are generated through participants communicating with each other rather than solely with the group moderator. The way in which interactions take place across group interviews and focus groups varies, yet both are referred to as focus groups, resulting in a broad umbrella term for its numerous manifestations.AIMTo reflect on how focus groups are adopted and reported, including the use of the term 'focus group'.DISCUSSIONThe authors recognise that the term 'focus group' is sometimes used synonymously with 'group interview' but argue that this practice must be challenged. They suggest using terms that indicate the type of space and synchronicity of the focus group, prefixed with 'in-person' or 'conventional' to identify traditional focus groups. They also suggest separating virtual group interviews into 'synchronous' and 'asynchronous', based on whether the participants and researchers can engage with each other in real time.CONCLUSIONThere is a need for qualitative researchers to reach a consensus about the nature of focus groups and group interviews, as well as where their differences and similarities lie.IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICEThe authors hope to encourage nurse researchers to think about these issues when labelling, planning, analysing and reporting studies involving focus groups.
背景将焦点小组与其他收集数据的方法区分开来的主要定义属性是,数据是通过参与者相互交流而不是仅仅与小组主持人交流产生的。小组访谈和焦点小组之间的互动方式各不相同,但两者都被称为焦点小组,这导致了其众多表现形式的一个宽泛的总括术语。目的反思焦点小组是如何被采用和报道的,包括“焦点小组”一词的使用。讨论作者认识到“焦点小组“一词有时与“小组访谈”同义,但认为必须对这种做法提出质疑。他们建议使用表明焦点群体的空间类型和同步性的术语,前缀为“面对面”或“传统”,以识别传统焦点群体。他们还建议,根据参与者和研究人员是否能够实时互动,将虚拟小组访谈分为“同步”和“异步”。结论定性研究人员需要就焦点小组和小组访谈的性质以及它们的差异和相似之处达成共识。对实践的启示作者希望鼓励护士研究人员在标记、规划、分析和报告涉及焦点小组的研究时考虑这些问题。
{"title":"Perspectives on reporting non-verbal interactions from the contemporary research focus group.","authors":"Iseult M. Wilson, Nikki Daniels, P. Gillen, K. Casson","doi":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1828","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2022.e1828","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000The main defining attribute that delineates focus groups from other methods of collecting data is that data are generated through participants communicating with each other rather than solely with the group moderator. The way in which interactions take place across group interviews and focus groups varies, yet both are referred to as focus groups, resulting in a broad umbrella term for its numerous manifestations.\u0000\u0000\u0000AIM\u0000To reflect on how focus groups are adopted and reported, including the use of the term 'focus group'.\u0000\u0000\u0000DISCUSSION\u0000The authors recognise that the term 'focus group' is sometimes used synonymously with 'group interview' but argue that this practice must be challenged. They suggest using terms that indicate the type of space and synchronicity of the focus group, prefixed with 'in-person' or 'conventional' to identify traditional focus groups. They also suggest separating virtual group interviews into 'synchronous' and 'asynchronous', based on whether the participants and researchers can engage with each other in real time.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000There is a need for qualitative researchers to reach a consensus about the nature of focus groups and group interviews, as well as where their differences and similarities lie.\u0000\u0000\u0000IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE\u0000The authors hope to encourage nurse researchers to think about these issues when labelling, planning, analysing and reporting studies involving focus groups.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43989834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Top tips for using social media in research 在研究中使用社交媒体的最佳技巧
IF 1.2 Q3 NURSING Pub Date : 2022-03-10 DOI: 10.7748/nr.30.1.6.s2
C. Stephen, L. Halcomb
{"title":"Top tips for using social media in research","authors":"C. Stephen, L. Halcomb","doi":"10.7748/nr.30.1.6.s2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.30.1.6.s2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42291008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: a reflection on researchers' experiences of its benefits and challenges and the lessons learnt from using it. 实施研究综合框架:研究人员对其益处和挑战的经验反思,以及从使用该框架中吸取的教训。
IF 1.2 Q3 NURSING Pub Date : 2022-03-10 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2022.e1827
Annelysse Jorgenson, Reginaldo Adalberto Luz, Luize Fábrega Juskevicius, Maria Clara Padoveze, Lesley Price

Background: In healthcare implementation research, there is little discussion of researchers' experiences of using frameworks, including the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Aim: To identify and discuss the benefits and challenges encountered and the lessons learnt from researchers' experiences of using the CFIR in different contexts and phases of research.

Discussion: This article synthesises the reflections of nursing and public health researchers on their experiences of using the CFIR across four separate healthcare-associated infection prevention and control implementation studies. The CFIR's benefits and challenges, the resolutions to these challenges and the lessons learnt from the application of the framework were discussed.

Conclusions: Identified benefits included the framework's adaptability and flexibility, and its provision of structure and shared language for research. Translation to another language and differentiating between domains and constructs were challenges.

Implications for practice: Nurse researchers may find this article useful when considering use of the CFIR, or to anticipate and prepare to overcome the challenges highlighted when using the framework.

背景:目的:确定并讨论研究人员在不同背景和研究阶段使用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)所带来的益处、遇到的挑战以及从中汲取的经验教训:本文总结了护理和公共卫生研究人员在四项独立的医疗相关感染预防与控制实施研究中使用 CFIR 的经验。文章讨论了 CFIR 的益处和挑战、应对这些挑战的方法以及从应用该框架中学到的经验教训:已确定的优点包括框架的适应性和灵活性,以及为研究提供结构和共同语言。将框架翻译成另一种语言以及区分领域和结构是面临的挑战:护士研究人员在考虑使用 CFIR 时,或在使用该框架时预测并准备克服所强调的挑战时,可能会发现这篇文章很有用。
{"title":"The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: a reflection on researchers' experiences of its benefits and challenges and the lessons learnt from using it.","authors":"Annelysse Jorgenson, Reginaldo Adalberto Luz, Luize Fábrega Juskevicius, Maria Clara Padoveze, Lesley Price","doi":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1827","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2022.e1827","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In healthcare implementation research, there is little discussion of researchers' experiences of using frameworks, including the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify and discuss the benefits and challenges encountered and the lessons learnt from researchers' experiences of using the CFIR in different contexts and phases of research.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This article synthesises the reflections of nursing and public health researchers on their experiences of using the CFIR across four separate healthcare-associated infection prevention and control implementation studies. The CFIR's benefits and challenges, the resolutions to these challenges and the lessons learnt from the application of the framework were discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Identified benefits included the framework's adaptability and flexibility, and its provision of structure and shared language for research. Translation to another language and differentiating between domains and constructs were challenges.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Nurse researchers may find this article useful when considering use of the CFIR, or to anticipate and prepare to overcome the challenges highlighted when using the framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":"30 1","pages":"31-38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139425734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: a reflection on researchers' experiences of its benefits and challenges and the lessons learnt from using it. 实施研究综合框架:反思研究人员对其益处和挑战的经验以及从使用该框架中吸取的教训。
IF 1.2 Q3 NURSING Pub Date : 2022-03-10 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2022.e1827
Annelysse Jorgenson, Reginaldo Adalberto Luz, Luize Fábrega Juskevicius, Maria Clara Padoveze, Lesley Price

Background: In healthcare implementation research, there is little discussion of researchers' experiences of using frameworks, including the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Aim: To identify and discuss the benefits and challenges encountered and the lessons learnt from researchers' experiences of using the CFIR in different contexts and phases of research.

Discussion: This article synthesises the reflections of nursing and public health researchers on their experiences of using the CFIR across four separate healthcare-associated infection prevention and control implementation studies. The CFIR's benefits and challenges, the resolutions to these challenges and the lessons learnt from the application of the framework were discussed.

Conclusions: Identified benefits included the framework's adaptability and flexibility, and its provision of structure and shared language for research. Translation to another language and differentiating between domains and constructs were challenges.

Implications for practice: Nurse researchers may find this article useful when considering use of the CFIR, or to anticipate and prepare to overcome the challenges highlighted when using the framework.

背景:在医疗保健实施研究中,很少讨论研究人员使用框架的经验,包括实施研究综合框架(CFIR)。目的:识别和讨论研究人员在不同背景和研究阶段使用CFIR的好处和遇到的挑战,以及从他们的经验中吸取的教训。讨论:本文综合了护理和公共卫生研究人员在四个独立的卫生保健相关感染预防和控制实施研究中使用CFIR的经验。讨论了CFIR的利益和挑战,解决这些挑战的方法以及从应用该框架中获得的经验教训。结论:确定的好处包括框架的适应性和灵活性,以及它为研究提供的结构和共享语言。翻译成另一种语言和区分领域和结构是挑战。对实践的启示:护理研究人员可能会发现这篇文章在考虑使用CFIR时很有用,或者在使用该框架时预测并准备克服突出的挑战。
{"title":"The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: a reflection on researchers' experiences of its benefits and challenges and the lessons learnt from using it.","authors":"Annelysse Jorgenson,&nbsp;Reginaldo Adalberto Luz,&nbsp;Luize Fábrega Juskevicius,&nbsp;Maria Clara Padoveze,&nbsp;Lesley Price","doi":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1827","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2022.e1827","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In healthcare implementation research, there is little discussion of researchers' experiences of using frameworks, including the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify and discuss the benefits and challenges encountered and the lessons learnt from researchers' experiences of using the CFIR in different contexts and phases of research.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This article synthesises the reflections of nursing and public health researchers on their experiences of using the CFIR across four separate healthcare-associated infection prevention and control implementation studies. The CFIR's benefits and challenges, the resolutions to these challenges and the lessons learnt from the application of the framework were discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Identified benefits included the framework's adaptability and flexibility, and its provision of structure and shared language for research. Translation to another language and differentiating between domains and constructs were challenges.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Nurse researchers may find this article useful when considering use of the CFIR, or to anticipate and prepare to overcome the challenges highlighted when using the framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":"30 1","pages":"31-38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9521877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: a reflection on researchers' experiences of its benefits and challenges and the lessons learnt from using it. 实施研究综合框架:研究人员对其益处和挑战的经验反思,以及从使用该框架中吸取的教训。
IF 1.2 Q3 NURSING Pub Date : 2022-03-10 Epub Date: 2022-03-03 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2022.e1827
Annelysse Jorgenson, Reginaldo Adalberto Luz, Luize Fábrega Juskevicius, Maria Clara Padoveze, Lesley Price

Background: In healthcare implementation research, there is little discussion of researchers' experiences of using frameworks, including the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Aim: To identify and discuss the benefits and challenges encountered and the lessons learnt from researchers' experiences of using the CFIR in different contexts and phases of research.

Discussion: This article synthesises the reflections of nursing and public health researchers on their experiences of using the CFIR across four separate healthcare-associated infection prevention and control implementation studies. The CFIR's benefits and challenges, the resolutions to these challenges and the lessons learnt from the application of the framework were discussed.

Conclusions: Identified benefits included the framework's adaptability and flexibility, and its provision of structure and shared language for research. Translation to another language and differentiating between domains and constructs were challenges.

Implications for practice: Nurse researchers may find this article useful when considering use of the CFIR, or to anticipate and prepare to overcome the challenges highlighted when using the framework.

背景:目的:确定并讨论研究人员在不同背景和研究阶段使用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)所带来的益处、遇到的挑战以及从中汲取的经验教训:本文总结了护理和公共卫生研究人员在四项独立的医疗相关感染预防与控制实施研究中使用 CFIR 的经验。文章讨论了 CFIR 的益处和挑战、应对这些挑战的方法以及从应用该框架中学到的经验教训:已确定的优点包括框架的适应性和灵活性,以及为研究提供结构和共同语言。将框架翻译成另一种语言以及区分领域和结构是面临的挑战:护士研究人员在考虑使用 CFIR 时,或在使用该框架时预测并准备克服所强调的挑战时,可能会发现这篇文章很有用。
{"title":"The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: a reflection on researchers' experiences of its benefits and challenges and the lessons learnt from using it.","authors":"Annelysse Jorgenson, Reginaldo Adalberto Luz, Luize Fábrega Juskevicius, Maria Clara Padoveze, Lesley Price","doi":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1827","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2022.e1827","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In healthcare implementation research, there is little discussion of researchers' experiences of using frameworks, including the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify and discuss the benefits and challenges encountered and the lessons learnt from researchers' experiences of using the CFIR in different contexts and phases of research.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This article synthesises the reflections of nursing and public health researchers on their experiences of using the CFIR across four separate healthcare-associated infection prevention and control implementation studies. The CFIR's benefits and challenges, the resolutions to these challenges and the lessons learnt from the application of the framework were discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Identified benefits included the framework's adaptability and flexibility, and its provision of structure and shared language for research. Translation to another language and differentiating between domains and constructs were challenges.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Nurse researchers may find this article useful when considering use of the CFIR, or to anticipate and prepare to overcome the challenges highlighted when using the framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":"30 1","pages":"31-38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139479188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Nurse Researcher
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1