首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Family Theory & Review最新文献

英文 中文
A symbolic interactionist model of White adolescents' digital critical racial literacy and digital anti-racist action 白人青少年数字种族批判素养和数字反种族主义行动的符号互动主义模型
IF 3.2 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12568
Sydney Klein, Annamaria Csizmadia, Kari Adamsons

Symbolic interactionism is useful for examining how various socialization contexts (e.g., family and media) inform adolescents' identity construction and role making. Some research supports the theory's application in understanding White adolescents' racial socialization and identity development. The theory has yet to be applied to understanding the critical components that are essential for understanding how individuals interact with a digital society where racial inequality is pervasive. We propose a model of White adolescents' racial identity in response to racial socialization, and how that relationship manifests in social media contexts. We discuss how racial and social media literacies interact with family socialization and identity-related experiences to promote White adolescents' critical race consciousness and introduce a novel application of digital critical racial literacy and digital anti-racist action. The model advances symbolic interactionism by incorporating a critical lens, and can inform interventions aimed to educate parents, White youth, and social-media developers on anti-racist development.

符号互动论有助于研究各种社会化环境(如家庭和媒体)如何影响青少年的身份建构和角色塑造。一些研究支持将该理论应用于理解白人青少年的种族社会化和身份发展。该理论尚未应用于理解个人如何与普遍存在种族不平等现象的数字社会互动的关键要素。我们提出了一个白人青少年在种族社会化过程中的种族身份模型,以及这种关系在社交媒体环境中的表现形式。我们讨论了种族和社交媒体素养如何与家庭社会化和身份相关经验相互作用,促进白人青少年的种族批判意识,并介绍了数字种族批判素养和数字反种族主义行动的新应用。该模型通过纳入批判性视角推进了符号互动论,并可为旨在教育家长、白人青少年和社交媒体开发者的反种族主义发展干预措施提供信息。
{"title":"A symbolic interactionist model of White adolescents' digital critical racial literacy and digital anti-racist action","authors":"Sydney Klein,&nbsp;Annamaria Csizmadia,&nbsp;Kari Adamsons","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12568","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.12568","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Symbolic interactionism is useful for examining how various socialization contexts (e.g., family and media) inform adolescents' identity construction and role making. Some research supports the theory's application in understanding White adolescents' racial socialization and identity development. The theory has yet to be applied to understanding the critical components that are essential for understanding how individuals interact with a digital society where racial inequality is pervasive. We propose a model of White adolescents' racial identity in response to racial socialization, and how that relationship manifests in social media contexts. We discuss how racial and social media literacies interact with family socialization and identity-related experiences to promote White adolescents' critical race consciousness and introduce a novel application of digital critical racial literacy and digital anti-racist action. The model advances symbolic interactionism by incorporating a critical lens, and can inform interventions aimed to educate parents, White youth, and social-media developers on anti-racist development.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"16 3","pages":"600-620"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141379659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Self-care rhetoric and institutional culpability: Theorizing the academy and intellectual labor 自我保健修辞与机构责任:学院与智力劳动的理论化
IF 3.2 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12567
Emily R. Cabaniss, Shannon N. Davis, Kylie L. Parrotta

Self-care, a ubiquitous concept commonly touted as the solution to an array of modern-day problems, implies unapologetic selfishness aimed at preserving mental, emotional, and physical health. The overtly individualistic framing in its most common usage—the centering of oneself for the sake of oneself—obscures power relations and structural/institutional inequalities that create the need for self-care. To deal with difficult work or family lives, taking up a hobby or some kind of diversion offers an escape that feels good; self-care serves as a kind of coping mechanism, but not a solution to a social problem. It also lets society, or more specifically, managers and administrators in organizations, off the hook because it places the onus on individuals to deal with challenges on their own rather than situating them as social problems. We critique shortcomings in self-care rhetoric employed by organizations—and specifically university administrators—to their members, by extending Hochschild's economy of gratitude framework.

自我保健是一个无处不在的概念,通常被吹捧为解决一系列现代问题的方法,它意味着毫无保留的自私,旨在维护心理、情感和身体健康。在最常见的用法中,这种明显的个人主义框架--为了自己而以自己为中心--掩盖了造成自我保健需求的权力关系和结构性/制度性不平等。为了应对艰难的工作或家庭生活,培养兴趣爱好或进行某种消遣可以提供一种感觉良好的逃避;自我保健是一种应对机制,但不是解决社会问题的办法。它还让社会,或者更具体地说,让组织中的管理者和行政人员摆脱困境,因为它把个人应对挑战的责任放在了他们自己身上,而不是把它们归结为社会问题。我们通过扩展霍赫希尔德的 "感恩经济 "框架,批判了组织--特别是大学管理者--对其成员使用的自我保健修辞中的不足之处。
{"title":"Self-care rhetoric and institutional culpability: Theorizing the academy and intellectual labor","authors":"Emily R. Cabaniss,&nbsp;Shannon N. Davis,&nbsp;Kylie L. Parrotta","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12567","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.12567","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Self-care, a ubiquitous concept commonly touted as the solution to an array of modern-day problems, implies unapologetic selfishness aimed at preserving mental, emotional, and physical health. The overtly individualistic framing in its most common usage—the centering of oneself for the sake of oneself—obscures power relations and structural/institutional inequalities that create the need for self-care. To deal with difficult work or family lives, taking up a hobby or some kind of diversion offers an escape that feels good; self-care serves as a kind of coping mechanism, but not a solution to a social problem. It also lets society, or more specifically, managers and administrators in organizations, off the hook because it places the onus on individuals to deal with challenges on their own rather than situating them as social problems. We critique shortcomings in self-care rhetoric employed by organizations—and specifically university administrators—to their members, by extending Hochschild's economy of gratitude framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"60-72"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141177486","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sharenting: A systematic review of the empirical literature Sharenting:实证文献的系统回顾
IF 3.2 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12566
Şule Betül Tosuntaş, Mark D. Griffiths

Sharenting, the practice of parents publicly sharing information about their children on social media, has become increasingly prevalent in recent years. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review in order to evaluate existing publications that have empirically investigated the sharenting phenomenon and conceptualized its characteristics and possible consequences. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, 61 studies were reviewed. Based on the point of view and focus of the studies, six themes emerged: characteristics of sharenting, children's privacy, professional sharenting, children's perspectives, factors affecting sharenting, and social media dilemmas. The review highlights the growing prevalence of sharenting and provides a comprehensive overview of the empirical investigations and conceptualizations of the phenomenon. The findings have implications for parents, professionals, and policymakers, and opportunities for future research to further understand the complex and multifaceted nature of sharenting.

近几年来,父母在社交媒体上公开分享子女信息的 "晒娃 "现象日益盛行。本研究的目的是进行系统性文献综述,以评估现有出版物中对 "分享 "现象进行实证调查并对其特征和可能后果进行概念化的内容。根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南,对 61 项研究进行了综述。根据这些研究的观点和重点,形成了六个主题:"分享 "的特点、儿童隐私、专业 "分享"、儿童视角、影响 "分享 "的因素以及社交媒体困境。综述强调了 "分享 "现象日益普遍,并全面概述了对这一现象的实证调查和概念化。研究结果对家长、专业人士和政策制定者具有启示意义,也为今后的研究提供了机会,以进一步了解 "分担家务 "的复杂性和多面性。
{"title":"Sharenting: A systematic review of the empirical literature","authors":"Şule Betül Tosuntaş,&nbsp;Mark D. Griffiths","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12566","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.12566","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sharenting, the practice of parents publicly sharing information about their children on social media, has become increasingly prevalent in recent years. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review in order to evaluate existing publications that have empirically investigated the sharenting phenomenon and conceptualized its characteristics and possible consequences. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, 61 studies were reviewed. Based on the point of view and focus of the studies, six themes emerged: characteristics of sharenting, children's privacy, professional sharenting, children's perspectives, factors affecting sharenting, and social media dilemmas. The review highlights the growing prevalence of sharenting and provides a comprehensive overview of the empirical investigations and conceptualizations of the phenomenon. The findings have implications for parents, professionals, and policymakers, and opportunities for future research to further understand the complex and multifaceted nature of sharenting.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"16 3","pages":"525-562"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jftr.12566","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141177602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Children's social–emotional learning as emotional labor: Recognizing children's contributions 儿童的社会情感学习是一种情感劳动:承认儿童的贡献
IF 4.5 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12561
Karina Ruiz
In the United States, the dominant contemporary understanding of childhood is one that is cultivated through children's role as dependents, served by adults who are their providers. This framework obscures how children contribute to society through their learning and practice. This paper proposes a reconsideration of children's learning to advance the theoretical conceptualization of emotional labor so that children's contributions can be recognized. To advance an expansion of how adults understand what children's contributions to society are, I frame their social–emotional learning as the practice of emotional labor, not as them simply obtaining the skills of emotional intelligence. In doing so, I advocate for seeing children as more than learners, but also as contributors and producers.
在美国,当代对童年的主流理解是,儿童作为受抚养人,由作为抚养人的成人提供服务。这一框架掩盖了儿童如何通过学习和实践为社会做出贡献。本文建议重新考虑儿童的学习,推进情感劳动的理论概念化,从而使儿童的贡献得到认可。为了扩展成人对儿童为社会所做贡献的理解,我将儿童的社会情感学习定义为情感劳动实践,而不是简单地将其理解为儿童获得了情商技能。通过这样做,我主张将儿童不仅仅视为学习者,还视为贡献者和生产者。
{"title":"Children's social–emotional learning as emotional labor: Recognizing children's contributions","authors":"Karina Ruiz","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12561","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12561","url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, the dominant contemporary understanding of childhood is one that is cultivated through children's role as dependents, served by adults who are their providers. This framework obscures how children contribute to society through their learning and practice. This paper proposes a reconsideration of children's learning to advance the theoretical conceptualization of emotional labor so that children's contributions can be recognized. To advance an expansion of how adults understand what children's contributions to society are, I frame their social–emotional learning as the practice of emotional labor, not as them simply obtaining the skills of emotional intelligence. In doing so, I advocate for seeing children as more than learners, but also as contributors and producers.","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"253 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140961513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Children's social–emotional learning as emotional labor: Recognizing children's contributions 儿童的社会情感学习是一种情感劳动:承认儿童的贡献
IF 3.2 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12561
Karina Ruiz

In the United States, the dominant contemporary understanding of childhood is one that is cultivated through children's role as dependents, served by adults who are their providers. This framework obscures how children contribute to society through their learning and practice. This paper proposes a reconsideration of children's learning to advance the theoretical conceptualization of emotional labor so that children's contributions can be recognized. To advance an expansion of how adults understand what children's contributions to society are, I frame their social–emotional learning as the practice of emotional labor, not as them simply obtaining the skills of emotional intelligence. In doing so, I advocate for seeing children as more than learners, but also as contributors and producers.

在美国,当代对童年的主流理解是,儿童作为受抚养人,由作为抚养人的成人提供服务。这一框架掩盖了儿童如何通过学习和实践为社会做出贡献。本文建议重新考虑儿童的学习,推进情感劳动的理论概念化,从而使儿童的贡献得到认可。为了扩展成人对儿童为社会所做贡献的理解,我将儿童的社会情感学习定义为情感劳动实践,而不是简单地将其理解为儿童获得了情商技能。通过这样做,我主张将儿童不仅仅视为学习者,还视为贡献者和生产者。
{"title":"Children's social–emotional learning as emotional labor: Recognizing children's contributions","authors":"Karina Ruiz","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12561","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.12561","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the United States, the dominant contemporary understanding of childhood is one that is cultivated through children's role as dependents, served by adults who are their providers. This framework obscures how children contribute to society through their learning and practice. This paper proposes a reconsideration of children's learning to advance the theoretical conceptualization of emotional labor so that children's contributions can be recognized. To advance an expansion of how adults understand what children's contributions to society are, I frame their social–emotional learning as the practice of emotional labor, not as them simply obtaining the skills of emotional intelligence. In doing so, I advocate for seeing children as more than learners, but also as contributors and producers.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"16 3","pages":"472-483"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140966951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The influence of family-based social assistance programs and parenting on child development: A conceptual framework for research with U.S. families in poverty 以家庭为基础的社会援助计划和养育方式对儿童发展的影响:美国贫困家庭研究的概念框架
IF 3.2 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12560
Kimberly R. Osborne

Nearly three decades since the passage of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, federal cash assistance to families in poverty in the United States has entered political discourse once more with the Biden Administration's introduction of the American Families Plan. At the heart of this discussion are theories of change that derive from the family and developmental sciences. As a result, scientists in these fields have a duty to understand the history of the last reform and the consequences it has since had for children in poverty. In this paper, I review the history of perspectives toward government social assistance programs, as well as extant research demonstrating the mechanisms through which maternal employment and federal cash assistance impact child wellbeing. Lastly, I propose a conceptual framework for understanding the influence of family-based social assistance programs and parenting on child wellbeing to guide future research.

自 1996 年《个人责任与工作机会协调法》通过近三十年后,随着拜登政府推出《美国家庭计划》,联邦对美国贫困家庭的现金援助再次进入政治讨论。这一讨论的核心是源自家庭和发展科学的变革理论。因此,这些领域的科学家有责任了解上一次改革的历史及其对贫困儿童的影响。在本文中,我将回顾对政府社会援助项目的看法的历史,以及证明母亲就业和联邦现金援助对儿童福祉的影响机制的现有研究。最后,我提出了一个概念框架来理解基于家庭的社会援助项目和养育方式对儿童福祉的影响,以指导未来的研究。
{"title":"The influence of family-based social assistance programs and parenting on child development: A conceptual framework for research with U.S. families in poverty","authors":"Kimberly R. Osborne","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12560","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.12560","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nearly three decades since the passage of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, federal cash assistance to families in poverty in the United States has entered political discourse once more with the Biden Administration's introduction of the American Families Plan. At the heart of this discussion are theories of change that derive from the family and developmental sciences. As a result, scientists in these fields have a duty to understand the history of the last reform and the consequences it has since had for children in poverty. In this paper, I review the history of perspectives toward government social assistance programs, as well as extant research demonstrating the mechanisms through which maternal employment and federal cash assistance impact child wellbeing. Lastly, I propose a conceptual framework for understanding the influence of family-based social assistance programs and parenting on child wellbeing to guide future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"16 2","pages":"255-271"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140551942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The importance of romantic relationships in preventing suicide 恋爱关系对预防自杀的重要性
IF 3.2 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12559
Sarah P. Carter, Erin Cobb, Laura A. Novak, Eric Ekman, Andrew Ton, Jessica M. LaCroix, Marjan Ghahramanlou-Holloway

Romantic relationships can both attenuate and exacerbate suicide risk. Suicide prevention strategies in the United States have emphasized the importance of healthy connections with others; however, suicide prevention efforts overwhelmingly continue to focus on individual-level interventions. This presents a missed opportunity to prevent suicide through a focus on romantic relationship factors that are strongly associated with suicidal thoughts and behaviors. To identify underutilized or new avenues for improving suicide prevention, the current article aims to (a) provide an overview of the literature on romantic relationship functioning and suicide risk in adults to elucidate potential prevention targets, and (b) use a public health framework to highlight evidence-based and emerging avenues to prevent suicide by targeting relevant relationship factors.

恋爱关系既能减轻也能加剧自杀风险。美国的自杀预防策略一直强调与他人建立健康联系的重要性;然而,自杀预防工作绝大多数仍侧重于个人层面的干预。这就错失了通过关注与自杀想法和行为密切相关的恋爱关系因素来预防自杀的良机。为了找出未被充分利用或新的途径来改进自杀预防工作,本文旨在(a)概述有关成人恋爱关系功能和自杀风险的文献,以阐明潜在的预防目标,以及(b)使用公共卫生框架来强调基于证据的和新兴的途径,通过针对相关关系因素来预防自杀。
{"title":"The importance of romantic relationships in preventing suicide","authors":"Sarah P. Carter,&nbsp;Erin Cobb,&nbsp;Laura A. Novak,&nbsp;Eric Ekman,&nbsp;Andrew Ton,&nbsp;Jessica M. LaCroix,&nbsp;Marjan Ghahramanlou-Holloway","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12559","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.12559","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Romantic relationships can both attenuate and exacerbate suicide risk. Suicide prevention strategies in the United States have emphasized the importance of healthy connections with others; however, suicide prevention efforts overwhelmingly continue to focus on individual-level interventions. This presents a missed opportunity to prevent suicide through a focus on romantic relationship factors that are strongly associated with suicidal thoughts and behaviors. To identify underutilized or new avenues for improving suicide prevention, the current article aims to (a) provide an overview of the literature on romantic relationship functioning and suicide risk in adults to elucidate potential prevention targets, and (b) use a public health framework to highlight evidence-based and emerging avenues to prevent suicide by targeting relevant relationship factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"16 2","pages":"352-373"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140317248","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Testimonio as a methodology in the study of sexual and intimate partner violence 将证词作为研究性暴力和亲密伴侣暴力的一种方法
IF 3.2 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12558
Veronica R. Barrios, Autumn Bermea, Ellison Luthy, Fan Xu

Sexual and intimate partner violence (SIV) continues to be a public health crisis, particularly among girls and women. Traditional and critical qualitative methodologies are often used to study SIV. This paper offers another methodology not traditionally used in family science, testimonio, as a critical, qualitative option. Testimonio is a methodology rooted in Indigenous, Latinx, and Chicano/a feminista studies, deployed in various fields, that centers the stories of marginalized members of society as they are rooted in systemic inequalities, including racism, (cis)sexism, and heteronormativity. A scoping review of the use of testimonio in family science and violence research was conducted and yielded minimal research. Given the dearth of research found through the review, recommendations for using testimonio in family science SIV research are offered along with examples from the authors' research.

性暴力和亲密伴侣暴力(SIV)仍然是一个公共卫生危机,尤其是在女童和妇女中。传统的和批判性的定性方法通常用于研究 SIV。本文提供了另一种传统上未用于家庭科学的方法--证词,作为一种批判性的定性选择。Testimonio 是一种根植于土著、拉美裔和奇卡诺/阿裔女权主义者研究的方法,应用于各个领域,以社会边缘化成员的故事为中心,因为这些故事根植于系统性的不平等,包括种族主义、(顺)性别主义和异性恋。我们对证词在家庭科学和暴力研究中的应用进行了范围审查,结果发现研究极少。鉴于综述中发现的研究极少,本文提出了在家庭科学 SIV 研究中使用证词的建议,并列举了作者研究中的实例。
{"title":"Testimonio as a methodology in the study of sexual and intimate partner violence","authors":"Veronica R. Barrios,&nbsp;Autumn Bermea,&nbsp;Ellison Luthy,&nbsp;Fan Xu","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12558","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.12558","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sexual and intimate partner violence (SIV) continues to be a public health crisis, particularly among girls and women. Traditional and critical qualitative methodologies are often used to study SIV. This paper offers another methodology not traditionally used in family science, <i>testimonio</i>, as a critical, qualitative option. <i>Testimonio</i> is a methodology rooted in Indigenous, Latinx, and Chicano/a <i>feminista</i> studies, deployed in various fields, that centers the stories of marginalized members of society as they are rooted in systemic inequalities, including racism, (cis)sexism, and heteronormativity. A scoping review of the use of <i>testimonio</i> in family science and violence research was conducted and yielded minimal research. Given the dearth of research found through the review, recommendations for using <i>testimonio</i> in family science SIV research are offered along with examples from the authors' research.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"16 2","pages":"235-254"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jftr.12558","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140142152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Celebrating the “good-enough families”: Family challenges and resilience during global adversity 庆祝 "足够好的家庭":全球逆境中的家庭挑战和复原力
IF 4.5 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12557
Carla Crespo, Ana Paula Relvas
<p>Families have historically been and remain the most significant units of human existence (Montefiore, <span>2022</span>). The recognition of the families' paradoxical position is as old as the beginning of family science. Although families are relational systems potentially providing great joy, support, and security, families are also where significant pain, loss, and trauma can originate from (Lebow, <span>2023</span>; Walsh, <span>2021</span>). Family science has reflected this paradox. Historically, following an Hegelian dialectic of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis, family science started by examining the deficits and identifying vulnerability and risk factors (thesis). The thesis was followed by a perspective shift that had scholars looking for the systems' strengths by addressing resources and protective factors (antithesis), and it has now arrived at a more mature and complex outlook, where elements from both traditions are not only acknowledged but also honored (a synthesis in working progress).</p><p>When the pandemic, a major global adverse event, hit, there was little wonder in how both these contrasting visions of family were observed. On the one side, there were stories in the news about family separation and loss (e.g., families of essential workers being split up, older family members in reclusion and dying alone), apprehension about growing conflict and violence, especially towards women and children, and concerns about survival for those who were laid-off or lost their jobs. On the other side, there were stories about families reconnecting with each other, being able to spend more time together (e.g., new fathers at home for a baby's first months) rediscovering the joys of nature walks, board games, and of the slow baking of bread from starter-dough. The fear of families succumbing to the pandemic coexisted with their glorification as a sanctuary in troubled times. Because this split was more evident in messages from mass media, family science was not immune to this polarization (Lebow, <span>2023</span>). Yet, the field had already evolved greatly and since early on in the pandemic scholars have called for a more nuanced, integrated, and dynamic view of families living through unprecedented adversity (e.g., Walsh, <span>2020</span>).</p><p>The will to transcend dichotomous thinking about families opened up an opportunity to revisit Donald Winnicott's concept of “the good enough mother” (Winnicott, <span>1953</span>, p. 92). Being as generative as a good idea can be, this term from the 1950s seemed to be particularly useful to apply to families in the post-pandemic world. Winnicott (<span>1953</span>) brilliantly observed that the mother adapted to the needs and growth of the baby and that, with time, it was necessary that she adapted less and less as the baby grew increasingly able to deal with the mother's small failures and tolerate the results of frustration. This attitude can be seen as a first lesson in resilience, as t
导言家庭在历史上一直是、现在仍然是人类生存的最重要单位(Montefiore,2022 年)。对家庭矛盾地位的认识与家庭科学的起源一样古老。虽然家庭是一个关系系统,有可能提供巨大的欢乐、支持和安全感,但家庭也是重大痛苦、损失和创伤的起源地(Lebow,2023;Walsh,2021)。家庭科学反映了这一悖论。从历史上看,按照黑格尔关于论题、对立面和综合的辩证法,家庭科学从研究缺陷、确定脆弱性和风险因素(论题)开始。在这一论题之后,学者们开始转变视角,通过研究资源和保护因素来寻找系统的优势(对立面),而现在则形成了一种更加成熟和复杂的观点,不仅承认而且尊重两种传统的要素(正在进行中的综合)。当大流行病这一全球重大不利事件发生时,人们对这两种截然不同的家庭观点的观察方式并不感到奇怪。一方面,新闻报道了家庭分离和损失的情况(例如,基本工人的家庭被拆散,年长的家庭成员被排斥在外或孤独终老),对冲突和暴力(尤其是针对妇女和儿童的冲突和暴力)日益加剧的担忧,以及对下岗或失业人员生存的担忧。另一方面,也有家庭重新建立联系,能够花更多时间在一起(例如,新爸爸在家照顾婴儿的头几个月),重新发现大自然漫步、棋盘游戏和用发酵面团慢慢烤面包的乐趣的故事。人们既担心家庭会受到大流行病的影响,又把家庭美化成动荡时期的避难所。由于这种分裂在大众媒体的信息中更为明显,家庭科学也未能幸免于这种两极分化(Lebow,2023 年)。然而,该领域已经有了很大的发展,自大流行病早期开始,学者们就呼吁以一种更加细致、综合和动态的视角来看待在前所未有的逆境中生活的家庭(例如,沃尔什,2020 年)。超越家庭二元对立思维的意愿为重新审视唐纳德-温尼科特(Donald Winnicott)的 "足够好的母亲"(Winnicott, 1953 年,第 92 页)概念提供了机会。作为一个具有创造性的好想法,这个 20 世纪 50 年代的术语似乎特别适用于流行病后世界的家庭。温尼科特(Winnicott,1953 年)精辟地指出,母亲要适应婴儿的需要和成长,随着时间的推移,随着婴儿越来越能够处理母亲的小失败和容忍挫折的结果,母亲有必要越来越少地适应婴儿的成长。这种态度可以看作是复原力的第一课,因为母亲/照顾者为孩子提供了在不完美的世界中茁壮成长的能力。同样,我们既不应该妖魔化也不应该美化在大流行病中摸爬滚打的家庭,而应该理解他们在巨大的不确定性面前提供足够的安全、支持和稳定的能力。同时,在影响所有系统层面的逆境中,家庭系统可以做的很多,也只能做这么多(Ungar,2021 年)。作为本特刊的客座编辑,我们赞同这种复杂性的立场:家庭的复原力不能被视为其优点或缺点的结果。相反,家庭在多系统背景下的中间位置,让我们看到了希望,认识到了他们的潜力和能动性,同时也让我们看到了谦逊和务实,看到了他们必须应对的环境力量,艾伦和亨德森(2022)。正如 Lebow(2023 年)所指出的,在这个动荡的时代,家庭正在尽其所能地进行应对,而对家庭的明智看法既包括他们所面临的挑战,也包括他们的复原力。因此,我们认为 "足够好的家庭 "应该得到赞美。这就是我们推出《全球逆境中家庭的挑战与复原力国际视角》特刊的动机。虽然在最初阶段,我们为这期特刊设想了几种可能性,但最终的结果让我们以一种不同的、更复杂的方式来思考全球逆境中的家庭,并形成了新的观点,这些观点不是从单篇论文中产生的,而是从整个特刊中产生的(Relvas,2023 年):本期汇集了来自阿根廷、巴西、墨西哥、新西兰、葡萄牙、西班牙、英国和美国八个国家的 16 位学者和实践者的 7 篇文章和 4 篇评论。在这篇介绍性文章中,我们阐述了整合特刊论文后产生的四大主题:全球逆境、背景下的逆境、背景下的抗逆力以及国际视角。我们利用这些论文来说明围绕这些主题进行的简要讨论。
{"title":"Celebrating the “good-enough families”: Family challenges and resilience during global adversity","authors":"Carla Crespo,&nbsp;Ana Paula Relvas","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12557","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.12557","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Families have historically been and remain the most significant units of human existence (Montefiore, &lt;span&gt;2022&lt;/span&gt;). The recognition of the families' paradoxical position is as old as the beginning of family science. Although families are relational systems potentially providing great joy, support, and security, families are also where significant pain, loss, and trauma can originate from (Lebow, &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;; Walsh, &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;). Family science has reflected this paradox. Historically, following an Hegelian dialectic of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis, family science started by examining the deficits and identifying vulnerability and risk factors (thesis). The thesis was followed by a perspective shift that had scholars looking for the systems' strengths by addressing resources and protective factors (antithesis), and it has now arrived at a more mature and complex outlook, where elements from both traditions are not only acknowledged but also honored (a synthesis in working progress).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When the pandemic, a major global adverse event, hit, there was little wonder in how both these contrasting visions of family were observed. On the one side, there were stories in the news about family separation and loss (e.g., families of essential workers being split up, older family members in reclusion and dying alone), apprehension about growing conflict and violence, especially towards women and children, and concerns about survival for those who were laid-off or lost their jobs. On the other side, there were stories about families reconnecting with each other, being able to spend more time together (e.g., new fathers at home for a baby's first months) rediscovering the joys of nature walks, board games, and of the slow baking of bread from starter-dough. The fear of families succumbing to the pandemic coexisted with their glorification as a sanctuary in troubled times. Because this split was more evident in messages from mass media, family science was not immune to this polarization (Lebow, &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;). Yet, the field had already evolved greatly and since early on in the pandemic scholars have called for a more nuanced, integrated, and dynamic view of families living through unprecedented adversity (e.g., Walsh, &lt;span&gt;2020&lt;/span&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The will to transcend dichotomous thinking about families opened up an opportunity to revisit Donald Winnicott's concept of “the good enough mother” (Winnicott, &lt;span&gt;1953&lt;/span&gt;, p. 92). Being as generative as a good idea can be, this term from the 1950s seemed to be particularly useful to apply to families in the post-pandemic world. Winnicott (&lt;span&gt;1953&lt;/span&gt;) brilliantly observed that the mother adapted to the needs and growth of the baby and that, with time, it was necessary that she adapted less and less as the baby grew increasingly able to deal with the mother's small failures and tolerate the results of frustration. This attitude can be seen as a first lesson in resilience, as t","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"16 1","pages":"7-16"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jftr.12557","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139967278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Family keyworker as a non-clinical and democratic figure to support hard-to-reach families from an attachment perspective 家庭关键工作者作为非临床的民主人物,从依恋的角度为难以接触到的家庭提供支持
IF 4.5 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12556
Ana Berástegui, Carlos Pitillas
<p>We express gratitude to both Silvia Lordello and Daniel J. Puhlman for their insightful comments on our paper entitled “The Family Keyworker as a Critical Element for Attachment Resilience in the Face of Adversity” (Berástegui & Pitillas, <span>2024</span>). Lordello's and Puhlman's observations and concerns regarding our application of an attachment lens to the work of family keyworkers (FKWs) provide us with an opportunity to nuance and better explain our proposal, within what we consider a fruitful academic and technical discussion. Discussing these issues in the context of a commented paper is enriching, both to the academic debate and to the field of intervention with families. We sincerely thank Dr. Lordello and Dr. Puhlman for their attentive reading of our work, and hope that our responses to their comments may do justice to the very valuable points that they present.</p><p>Daniel J. Puhlman's commentary, entitled “Supporting and Enhancing Attachment Resilience is Essential for Helping High-Risk Families: But is the Family Keyworker the Best One for the Job?” is premised on the idea that we should carefully consider “who is providing which services, the qualifications and training these professionals receive, and the strategies and interventions they are asked to employ in providing support and assistance” (Puhlman, <span>2024</span>). This consideration is crucial for interventions to be not only efficient but also ethical. He expresses concern that our proposal may risk opening the door to the use of clinical, complex intervention strategies by a broad range of family professionals. If this were the case, he rightly argues that we would face two major problems: (a) the absence of a proper foundation for working within attachment processes by FKWs, and (b) the risks associated with FKWs' use of attachment-oriented strategies. Puhlman elaborates on both concerns, stating that “working through deep and personal traumas” embedded in families' attachment functioning, as well as “helping families repair attachment injuries and wounds” requires deep conversations, time, patience, and advanced clinical training, all of which may be beyond the qualifications of most FKWs. This could push technical boundaries outside their range of tolerance and facilitate ethical dangers regarding both the professionals' scope of practice and the development of reciprocal attachment that may compromise the professional's objectivity and role integrity, potentially leading to harmful results.</p><p>We acknowledge that, from Puhlman's perspective, these concerns are reasonable. However, our translation of attachment resilience processes (Berástegui & Pitillas, <span>2021</span>) into a model of family support by FKWs is never meant to become a therapeutic endeavor, nor is it oriented to facilitate processes of a clinical nature (e.g., repairing attachment wounds within families). We do not intend for our work to be interpreted as an invitation to using
感谢西尔维娅-洛德罗(Silvia Lordello)和丹尼尔-普尔曼(Daniel J. Puhlman)对我们题为《家庭关键工作者作为面对逆境时依恋复原力的关键要素》(Berástegui & Pitillas, 2023)的论文所提出的深刻见解。Lordello 和 Puhlman 对我们将依恋视角应用于家庭关键工作者(FKWs)工作的观察和担忧,为我们提供了一个机会,在我们认为富有成果的学术和技术讨论中,对我们的建议进行细化和更好的解释。在评论性论文的背景下讨论这些问题,无论是对学术讨论还是对家庭干预领域来说,都是一种丰富。我们衷心感谢 Lordello 博士和 Puhlman 博士对我们工作的细心阅读,并希望我们对他们评论的回应能够对得起他们提出的非常有价值的观点。
{"title":"Family keyworker as a non-clinical and democratic figure to support hard-to-reach families from an attachment perspective","authors":"Ana Berástegui,&nbsp;Carlos Pitillas","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12556","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.12556","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;We express gratitude to both Silvia Lordello and Daniel J. Puhlman for their insightful comments on our paper entitled “The Family Keyworker as a Critical Element for Attachment Resilience in the Face of Adversity” (Berástegui &amp; Pitillas, &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;). Lordello's and Puhlman's observations and concerns regarding our application of an attachment lens to the work of family keyworkers (FKWs) provide us with an opportunity to nuance and better explain our proposal, within what we consider a fruitful academic and technical discussion. Discussing these issues in the context of a commented paper is enriching, both to the academic debate and to the field of intervention with families. We sincerely thank Dr. Lordello and Dr. Puhlman for their attentive reading of our work, and hope that our responses to their comments may do justice to the very valuable points that they present.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Daniel J. Puhlman's commentary, entitled “Supporting and Enhancing Attachment Resilience is Essential for Helping High-Risk Families: But is the Family Keyworker the Best One for the Job?” is premised on the idea that we should carefully consider “who is providing which services, the qualifications and training these professionals receive, and the strategies and interventions they are asked to employ in providing support and assistance” (Puhlman, &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;). This consideration is crucial for interventions to be not only efficient but also ethical. He expresses concern that our proposal may risk opening the door to the use of clinical, complex intervention strategies by a broad range of family professionals. If this were the case, he rightly argues that we would face two major problems: (a) the absence of a proper foundation for working within attachment processes by FKWs, and (b) the risks associated with FKWs' use of attachment-oriented strategies. Puhlman elaborates on both concerns, stating that “working through deep and personal traumas” embedded in families' attachment functioning, as well as “helping families repair attachment injuries and wounds” requires deep conversations, time, patience, and advanced clinical training, all of which may be beyond the qualifications of most FKWs. This could push technical boundaries outside their range of tolerance and facilitate ethical dangers regarding both the professionals' scope of practice and the development of reciprocal attachment that may compromise the professional's objectivity and role integrity, potentially leading to harmful results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We acknowledge that, from Puhlman's perspective, these concerns are reasonable. However, our translation of attachment resilience processes (Berástegui &amp; Pitillas, &lt;span&gt;2021&lt;/span&gt;) into a model of family support by FKWs is never meant to become a therapeutic endeavor, nor is it oriented to facilitate processes of a clinical nature (e.g., repairing attachment wounds within families). We do not intend for our work to be interpreted as an invitation to using ","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"16 1","pages":"139-143"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jftr.12556","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139923154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Family Theory & Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1