Journal of Family Theory & Review最新文献

Filial piety, as an important value and social norm, influences individual well-being. However, previous studies have shown inconsistencies regarding the relationship between filial piety and life satisfaction. Based on the dual filial piety model, this meta-analysis aimed to thoroughly assess the relationship between dual filial piety, which includes reciprocal filial piety (RFP) and authoritative filial piety (AFP), and life satisfaction. Through a systematic literature search, a total of 21 studies with 11,775 participants and 40 effect sizes were identified. Our results indicated a significant positive association between both RFP and AFP and life satisfaction. In addition, several moderating factors, including age, year of publication, and geographic region, were found to influence these relationships. These insights are particularly relevant for family scientists, researchers, and professionals, providing evidence-based guidance for enhancing interventions focused on familial relationships and individual well-being across diverse cultural contexts.

The article by Dyer (2024) tells the origin story of human development and family science (HDFS). Dyer suggested that HDFS inherited its discipline and department from home economics, but the phasing out of home economics from academia has led to disciplinary fragmentation. This commentary is rooted in my experiences as an HDFS scholar, faculty at two different historically Black universities, and mentor to underrepresented scholars. I have found an academic home in the departments of Family and Consumer Sciences, Psychology, and HDFS. Each department has served my scholarship of discovery thereby demonstrating the disciplinary fragmentation stressed by Dyer. Commonalities and points of distinction across these departments and institutions are discussed following a brief primer on Historically Black Colleges or Universities (HBCUs). Considering the origin story and focus of HDFS at HBCUs would further strengthen our position in the academy.

This special issue explores the positionality of feminist administrators within Human Development and Family Science (HDFS) and their efforts to enhance the discipline's visibility, value, and impact. Drawing from extensive administrative and leadership experiences, the contributors examine the status and boundaries of HDFS in higher education, addressing issues such as devaluation linked to masculinist ideologies, structural challenges, and the need for equitable power distribution. The collection also critiques neoliberalism in academia, advocating for human well-being as the core of HDFS programs. Key themes include the historical and societal contexts of HDFS, critical problems such as burnout and trauma, diverse contributions, and the intellectual work of administration. The issue calls for a transformation in higher education that prioritizes human dignity, inclusivity, and meaningful community engagement, aiming for a more just and effective academic system.

In the fall and winter of 2024, co-guest editors Ramona Oswald and Anisa Zvonkovic talked with Vice President Menah Pratt about her vision for higher education. Dr. Pratt is internationally recognized for her work in leading change in academic institutions. The discussion centered on the unique and precious opportunity of higher education for students, the transformative potential of this opportunity, at the present moment.

Breast cancer is the second most common cancer diagnosed among women in the United States. Although advances in detection and medical treatment have improved survival rates, breast cancer survivors experience physical symptoms and psychological distress that can adversely impact their quality of life. Examining the quality of life in breast cancer survivors is important as it may inform supportive services, patient-centered care, and well-being after treatment. Theoretical perspectives such as ambiguous loss theory can assist in understanding the factors that shape quality of life. Ambiguous loss theory, developed by Pauline Boss, refers to a loss that remains unclear, unresolved, and lacks closure. Grief theorists have acknowledged grief associated with symbolic losses, such as the loss of health status. The current article integrates empirical research and established constructs derived from ambiguous loss theory to develop a middle-range theory focused on explaining quality of life among breast cancer survivors.

Despite long-standing research demonstrating the prevalence of trauma/loss and increased visibility in the recent pandemic, natural disasters, and political violence, many institutions maintaining neoliberal ideologies and practices minimize or disregard the presence and impact of loss and grief on individuals, families, and communities. This deficit in education informs pedagogical approaches and support gaps wherein students remain the forgotten mourners with missed opportunities for development around the universal human experience of loss. In contrast to the neoliberal academy, drawing on feminist, arts-based, and trauma-informed pedagogies, we offer a disruption to neoliberalism by encouraging a theoretical push for scholars to normalize loss in development, enfranchise grief, and promote restorative practices. We share an example featuring art paired with Human Development and Family Science content (Healing in the Arts/HITA), whereby students drew on and/or observed performance art to engage with trauma, loss, and grief. We share strategies for faculty to address trauma and loss and offer resources and support.

Sexual and gender minority (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgnder: LGBT) adults experience heightened social discrimination and minority stress throughout their lives because of their minority identities. LGBT older adults are particularly vulnerable to the impact of minority stress as they are more likely to live alone and to be estranged from their families of origin. To cope, many LGBT older adults have developed social networks that include chosen families and non-biological relatives who care for one another as if they are family. The chosen family resilience strategy renegotiates what it means to do family and is worthy of theoretical examination. We apply the convoy model of social relations as an interdisciplinary framework for examining LGBT older adults' social networks and chosen families. We discuss points of convergence between the model and what is known about LGBT social networks, and we extend the model to account for chosen families and online social connections.

In recent decades, there has been increased attention paid to the phenomenon of forced marriage. However, much of this work positions forced marriage as a problem of “backwards” culture or religion. This scoping review synthesizes and critiques research on forced marriage, showing that extant research has focused on individual circumstances of vulnerability, forced entrance to marriage, and cisgendered heterosexual women. These narrow framings eclipse the structural drivers, forces that prevent exit, and experiences of heterosexual men, queer individuals, and those with disabilities. Overall, the reviewed literature demonstrates the opportunity of applying new methodological (e.g., social autopsy), conceptual (e.g., post-carceral approaches), and descriptive (e.g., gender and sexual minority people) approaches to this social problem. We urge family scientists to pay more attention to forced marriage, as they are uniquely positioned to parse out distinctions in the range of experiences that constitute forced marriage and to consider strategies to support marital self-determination.