Pub Date : 2021-07-01DOI: 10.1177/01417789211015269
Laura Rodriguez Castro
Linked to extractive practices, territorial dispossession can be traced back to the colonisation of Abya Yala. From a decolonial commitment, this article complicates notions of dispossession and extractivism as merely emerging from war in Colombia and focuses on their presence in Campesinas territories. Based on the conceptualisations of the coloniality of power and coloniality of gender, I narrate how territorial dispossession and extractivism are felt in women’s ‘body-lands’ through foreign tourism/conservation development and new export crops in two rural veredas in the Colombian Andes and in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta where I conducted participatory visual projects in 2016. From a relational understanding of place, I also demonstrate the ways that the rural population is resisting and negotiating within these processes. Ultimately, I make a call for feminist scholars to politically commit to the dismantling of the coloniality of gender, and to the resistances to territorial dispossession and extractivism (epistemic and economic) that rural women are leading in place in the Global South.
{"title":"Extractivism and Territorial Dispossession in Rural Colombia: A Decolonial Commitment to Campesinas’ Politics of Place","authors":"Laura Rodriguez Castro","doi":"10.1177/01417789211015269","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01417789211015269","url":null,"abstract":"Linked to extractive practices, territorial dispossession can be traced back to the colonisation of Abya Yala. From a decolonial commitment, this article complicates notions of dispossession and extractivism as merely emerging from war in Colombia and focuses on their presence in Campesinas territories. Based on the conceptualisations of the coloniality of power and coloniality of gender, I narrate how territorial dispossession and extractivism are felt in women’s ‘body-lands’ through foreign tourism/conservation development and new export crops in two rural veredas in the Colombian Andes and in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta where I conducted participatory visual projects in 2016. From a relational understanding of place, I also demonstrate the ways that the rural population is resisting and negotiating within these processes. Ultimately, I make a call for feminist scholars to politically commit to the dismantling of the coloniality of gender, and to the resistances to territorial dispossession and extractivism (epistemic and economic) that rural women are leading in place in the Global South.","PeriodicalId":47487,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Review","volume":"128 1","pages":"44 - 61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/01417789211015269","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47398701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-01DOI: 10.1177/01417789211013446
D. Keys
According to the US Department of Justice, women (33 per cent) are more likely than men (19 per cent) to experience violent victimisation (Morgan and Kena, 2018). Black women students are especially at risk of experiencing rape or sexual assault (Planty et al., 2013). A special report on sexual violence among college-age women found that between 1995 and 2013, the rate of sexual violence victimisation for Black females was 2.5 times higher than for white females (Sinozich and Langton, 2014). Furthermore, unlike other groups, Black women students were more likely to experience sexual victimisation than Black women non-students (ibid.). While Black women students experience higher rates of sexual violence, they remain on the periphery in discussions about sexual violence in higher education and violence against Black women (Wooten, 2017). Black women’s violent victimisation in higher education and the marginal attention to the problem reveal the persistence of the US’ historical legacy of racist and sexual violence.
{"title":"Black Women’s Lives Matter: Social Movements and Storytelling against Sexual and Gender-based Violence in the US","authors":"D. Keys","doi":"10.1177/01417789211013446","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01417789211013446","url":null,"abstract":"According to the US Department of Justice, women (33 per cent) are more likely than men (19 per cent) to experience violent victimisation (Morgan and Kena, 2018). Black women students are especially at risk of experiencing rape or sexual assault (Planty et al., 2013). A special report on sexual violence among college-age women found that between 1995 and 2013, the rate of sexual violence victimisation for Black females was 2.5 times higher than for white females (Sinozich and Langton, 2014). Furthermore, unlike other groups, Black women students were more likely to experience sexual victimisation than Black women non-students (ibid.). While Black women students experience higher rates of sexual violence, they remain on the periphery in discussions about sexual violence in higher education and violence against Black women (Wooten, 2017). Black women’s violent victimisation in higher education and the marginal attention to the problem reveal the persistence of the US’ historical legacy of racist and sexual violence.","PeriodicalId":47487,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Review","volume":"128 1","pages":"163 - 168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/01417789211013446","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42741786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-01DOI: 10.1177/01417789211015334
Suzanne C. Persard
From yoga to the Anthropocene to feminist theory, recent calls to ‘decolonise’ have resulted in a resurgence of the term. This article problematises the language of the decolonial within feminist theory and pedagogy, problematising its rhetoric, particularly in the context of the US. The article considers the romanticised transnational solidarities produced by decolonial rhetoric within feminist theory, asking, among other questions: What are the assumptions underpinning the decolonial project in feminist theory? How might the language of ‘decolonising’ serve to actually de-politicise feminism, while keeping dominant race logics in place? Furthermore, how does decolonial rhetoric in sites such as the US continue to romanticise feminist solidarities while positioning non-US-born women of colour at the pedagogical end of feminist theory? I argue that ‘decolonial’, in its current proliferation, is mainstreamed uncritically while serving as a catachresis within feminist discourse. This article asks feminism to reconsider its ease at an incitement to decolonise as a caution for resisting the call to decolonise as simply another form of multicultural liberalism that masks oppression through imagined transnational solidarities, while calling attention to the homogenous construction of the ‘Global South’ within decolonising discourse.
{"title":"The Radical Limits of Decolonising Feminism","authors":"Suzanne C. Persard","doi":"10.1177/01417789211015334","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01417789211015334","url":null,"abstract":"From yoga to the Anthropocene to feminist theory, recent calls to ‘decolonise’ have resulted in a resurgence of the term. This article problematises the language of the decolonial within feminist theory and pedagogy, problematising its rhetoric, particularly in the context of the US. The article considers the romanticised transnational solidarities produced by decolonial rhetoric within feminist theory, asking, among other questions: What are the assumptions underpinning the decolonial project in feminist theory? How might the language of ‘decolonising’ serve to actually de-politicise feminism, while keeping dominant race logics in place? Furthermore, how does decolonial rhetoric in sites such as the US continue to romanticise feminist solidarities while positioning non-US-born women of colour at the pedagogical end of feminist theory? I argue that ‘decolonial’, in its current proliferation, is mainstreamed uncritically while serving as a catachresis within feminist discourse. This article asks feminism to reconsider its ease at an incitement to decolonise as a caution for resisting the call to decolonise as simply another form of multicultural liberalism that masks oppression through imagined transnational solidarities, while calling attention to the homogenous construction of the ‘Global South’ within decolonising discourse.","PeriodicalId":47487,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Review","volume":"128 1","pages":"13 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/01417789211015334","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49532315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-01DOI: 10.1177/01417789211013777
A. Khan
The trope of the repressive Muslim, obstinately attached to their regressive world views, recalcitrant antagoniser of modernity, has become a thoroughly familiar drama. Redundant spectacles abound: events often highly mediatised, substantiated by conservativism and liberalism alike, deployed as justification for policing, surveillance and invasion. The 2019 protests against the ‘No Outsiders’ LGBT lessons held in Birmingham, England are one such spectacle. Foregoing the dominant portrayal of the protests as an event of Muslim homophobia, I instead examine the social processes that render the event exceptional in the British imaginary and the statecraft it subsequently enables. First, the protests’ production as a spectacular event is analysed through the historical conditions of Europe’s self-constitution through Islam-as-Threat. It is through liberalism’s amnesiac frame, one that erases its imperial and racist culpability, that the sexual exceptionalism that undergirds the spectacle of the protests can be understood. Second, reading the protests ‘sideways’, I argue, reveals how the displacement of homophobia onto Muslims continues liberalism’s tradition of situating its Others as oppositional to its purported gendered and sexual freedoms. In this context, sex education as deradicalisation of Muslim pupils becomes normalised, even as British liberalism disavows racism. Thirdly, the inclusion of queer Muslims as the authentic voice emerging from the cross-sections of queer and Muslim identity is critiqued as a ‘non-performativity’. Rather than offering a relational understanding of queer, Muslim and queer Muslim vulnerabilities, this inclusion elides an intersectional analysis of British homonationalism. I conclude by arguing for ‘an unalienated politics’ that is vigilant to co-optation, refusing to treat queerness as an exceptional site of injury. As such, how can we imagine the ‘queer’ in queer Muslim as a political position that refuses to capitulate to the hierarchisation of the human?
{"title":"In Defence of an Unalienated Politic: a Critical Appraisal of the ‘No Outsiders’ Protests","authors":"A. Khan","doi":"10.1177/01417789211013777","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01417789211013777","url":null,"abstract":"The trope of the repressive Muslim, obstinately attached to their regressive world views, recalcitrant antagoniser of modernity, has become a thoroughly familiar drama. Redundant spectacles abound: events often highly mediatised, substantiated by conservativism and liberalism alike, deployed as justification for policing, surveillance and invasion. The 2019 protests against the ‘No Outsiders’ LGBT lessons held in Birmingham, England are one such spectacle. Foregoing the dominant portrayal of the protests as an event of Muslim homophobia, I instead examine the social processes that render the event exceptional in the British imaginary and the statecraft it subsequently enables. First, the protests’ production as a spectacular event is analysed through the historical conditions of Europe’s self-constitution through Islam-as-Threat. It is through liberalism’s amnesiac frame, one that erases its imperial and racist culpability, that the sexual exceptionalism that undergirds the spectacle of the protests can be understood. Second, reading the protests ‘sideways’, I argue, reveals how the displacement of homophobia onto Muslims continues liberalism’s tradition of situating its Others as oppositional to its purported gendered and sexual freedoms. In this context, sex education as deradicalisation of Muslim pupils becomes normalised, even as British liberalism disavows racism. Thirdly, the inclusion of queer Muslims as the authentic voice emerging from the cross-sections of queer and Muslim identity is critiqued as a ‘non-performativity’. Rather than offering a relational understanding of queer, Muslim and queer Muslim vulnerabilities, this inclusion elides an intersectional analysis of British homonationalism. I conclude by arguing for ‘an unalienated politics’ that is vigilant to co-optation, refusing to treat queerness as an exceptional site of injury. As such, how can we imagine the ‘queer’ in queer Muslim as a political position that refuses to capitulate to the hierarchisation of the human?","PeriodicalId":47487,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Review","volume":"128 1","pages":"132 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/01417789211013777","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45933475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-01DOI: 10.1177/0141778921992310
Storäe Michele
{"title":"Book Review: M Archive: After the End of the World by Alexis Pauline Gumbs","authors":"Storäe Michele","doi":"10.1177/0141778921992310","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0141778921992310","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47487,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Review","volume":"128 1","pages":"169 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0141778921992310","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44769891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-01DOI: 10.1177/01417789211006140
Anikó Szûcs
Women Mobilizing Memory is the first comprehensive anthology in the emerging field of practice-based feminist memory studies. The book, as outlined in Marianne Hirsch’s insightful introduction, and then exemplified by a wide variety of case studies, performs three important theoretical and methodological interventions in the field of memory studies. First, Women Mobilizing Memory explores what constitutes feminist memory today, primarily by emphasising a feminist ‘ethics of transculturality’ that facilitates transnational conversations while also acknowledging ‘the limits of translatability’ of singular experiences and distinctive sociopolitical contexts (pp. 12–13). Second, it underlines the inherent transculturality of the twenty-first century virtual memory sites and spaces by forging new methodologies in the practices and analyses of online memory practices. Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly, the book illuminates how feminist acts of memory discussed in the volume extend the ritual of commemoration and become powerful acts of resistance.
{"title":"Book Review: Women Mobilizing Memory edited by Ayșe Gül Altınay, María José Contreras, Marianne Hirsch, Jean Howard, Banu Karaca and Alisa Solomon","authors":"Anikó Szûcs","doi":"10.1177/01417789211006140","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01417789211006140","url":null,"abstract":"Women Mobilizing Memory is the first comprehensive anthology in the emerging field of practice-based feminist memory studies. The book, as outlined in Marianne Hirsch’s insightful introduction, and then exemplified by a wide variety of case studies, performs three important theoretical and methodological interventions in the field of memory studies. First, Women Mobilizing Memory explores what constitutes feminist memory today, primarily by emphasising a feminist ‘ethics of transculturality’ that facilitates transnational conversations while also acknowledging ‘the limits of translatability’ of singular experiences and distinctive sociopolitical contexts (pp. 12–13). Second, it underlines the inherent transculturality of the twenty-first century virtual memory sites and spaces by forging new methodologies in the practices and analyses of online memory practices. Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly, the book illuminates how feminist acts of memory discussed in the volume extend the ritual of commemoration and become powerful acts of resistance.","PeriodicalId":47487,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Review","volume":"128 1","pages":"173 - 175"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/01417789211006140","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43463454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-01DOI: 10.1177/01417789211011517
Hasnaa Mokhtar
The 15th of October 2019 was a sunny day in the beautiful city of Rabat, Morocco. A group of twenty fellows at the ‘Women and Politics: Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Experiences’ programme gathered in the hotel’s meeting room to present our work and receive feedback from one another. When it was my turn to share my review, I challenged the persistent dominance of canonical Western theory and methodologies to study and understand women and gender in the ‘MENA’ region. In that moment, I was able to voice a different opinion thanks to the academic resilience and grounding which I owe to the emotional labour and scholarly contributions of pioneering anti-racist, anti-sexist, anti-capitalist decolonial feminists. I also draw my inspiration from conversations and contentions I continue to have with mentors and colleagues who are concerned with destabilising accepted modes of knowledgemaking in other regions of the world.
{"title":"A Plea To ‘Middle Eastern and North African’ Feminists: Let’s Liberate Ourselves from Notions of Coloniality","authors":"Hasnaa Mokhtar","doi":"10.1177/01417789211011517","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01417789211011517","url":null,"abstract":"The 15th of October 2019 was a sunny day in the beautiful city of Rabat, Morocco. A group of twenty fellows at the ‘Women and Politics: Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Experiences’ programme gathered in the hotel’s meeting room to present our work and receive feedback from one another. When it was my turn to share my review, I challenged the persistent dominance of canonical Western theory and methodologies to study and understand women and gender in the ‘MENA’ region. In that moment, I was able to voice a different opinion thanks to the academic resilience and grounding which I owe to the emotional labour and scholarly contributions of pioneering anti-racist, anti-sexist, anti-capitalist decolonial feminists. I also draw my inspiration from conversations and contentions I continue to have with mentors and colleagues who are concerned with destabilising accepted modes of knowledgemaking in other regions of the world.","PeriodicalId":47487,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Review","volume":"128 1","pages":"148 - 155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/01417789211011517","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46851759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-01DOI: 10.1177/01417789211013432
Karla M Padrón
{"title":"To Decolonise is to Beautify: A Perspective from Two Transgender Latina Makeup Artists in the US","authors":"Karla M Padrón","doi":"10.1177/01417789211013432","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01417789211013432","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47487,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Review","volume":"128 1","pages":"156 - 162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/01417789211013432","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45050882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-01DOI: 10.1177/01417789211006126
Alberto McKelligan Hernández
{"title":"Book Review: Women Made Visible: Feminist Art and Media in Post-1968 Mexico City by Gabriela Aceves Sepúlveda","authors":"Alberto McKelligan Hernández","doi":"10.1177/01417789211006126","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01417789211006126","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47487,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Review","volume":"128 1","pages":"179 - 180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/01417789211006126","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45461677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-07-01DOI: 10.1177/01417789211015333
Po-Han Lee
Queer theorists have considered the problems concerning the political strategy of using LGBT rights to justify racist xenophobia and using homo/transphobia to consolidate heterosexist nationalism. Their timely interventions are important in exposing state violence in the name of human rights and sovereign equality, but they have offered no alternative. They may also have reinforced the assumption of state science. This assumption is based on a trinity structure of the nation-state-sovereignty of ‘modern, self-determining men’, who are against each other and thereby co-built the so-called ‘international’. State-centric internationalism produces exclusionary effects that undermine the rights of sexual and gender minorities. To address this, I first consider the debate over ‘LGBT rights as human rights’, and identify two types of cultural relativism (epistemological and political) as the categories to formulate a decolonial response to the debate. In this article, queer political theorising is pushed forward to: 1) critically evaluate universalism, 2) differentiate cultural relativism (opposing the political version of it) and 3) revise the epistemological version with decolonial-queer praxis. I propose a pluralist approach to sovereignty and human rights; informed by this approach, the lack of international consensus is remedied by recognising the polyvocality within transnational queer activism beyond the monopoly of states’ representation of their own peoples. This proposal also aims to decentre modern statecraft from the political imagination of contemporary international studies scholarship.
{"title":"A Pluralist Approach to ‘the International’ and Human Rights for Sexual and Gender Minorities","authors":"Po-Han Lee","doi":"10.1177/01417789211015333","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01417789211015333","url":null,"abstract":"Queer theorists have considered the problems concerning the political strategy of using LGBT rights to justify racist xenophobia and using homo/transphobia to consolidate heterosexist nationalism. Their timely interventions are important in exposing state violence in the name of human rights and sovereign equality, but they have offered no alternative. They may also have reinforced the assumption of state science. This assumption is based on a trinity structure of the nation-state-sovereignty of ‘modern, self-determining men’, who are against each other and thereby co-built the so-called ‘international’. State-centric internationalism produces exclusionary effects that undermine the rights of sexual and gender minorities. To address this, I first consider the debate over ‘LGBT rights as human rights’, and identify two types of cultural relativism (epistemological and political) as the categories to formulate a decolonial response to the debate. In this article, queer political theorising is pushed forward to: 1) critically evaluate universalism, 2) differentiate cultural relativism (opposing the political version of it) and 3) revise the epistemological version with decolonial-queer praxis. I propose a pluralist approach to sovereignty and human rights; informed by this approach, the lack of international consensus is remedied by recognising the polyvocality within transnational queer activism beyond the monopoly of states’ representation of their own peoples. This proposal also aims to decentre modern statecraft from the political imagination of contemporary international studies scholarship.","PeriodicalId":47487,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Review","volume":"128 1","pages":"79 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/01417789211015333","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45250598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：