Pub Date : 2025-11-11DOI: 10.1080/10550887.2025.2581471
Qing Yu, Caihong Ye, Sili Wang, Zhenzhou Zheng, Quansheng Sun, Yuanbin Wang
Methods: In this retrospective case-control study we enrolled 283 patients with AUD (261 men, 22 women) admitted between 2021 and 2024, of whom 80 had AIPD. Baseline levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (FT4), free triiodothyronine (FT3), thyroxine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3) were measured at the time of admission. A second measurement was performed three to four weeks after detoxification. Baseline values were compared with those of 300 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Longitudinal changes within the AUD cohort and differences between AIPD and non-AIPD subgroups were analyzed by paired t-tests and chi-square tests as appropriate.
Results: Mean serum levels of FT4, FT3, T4 and T3 were significantly lower in AUD patients than in healthy controls, while TSH had no significant change. In the same comparison, the proportion of individuals with abnormal thyroid parameters was higher in the AUD group than in controls. Among AUD patients, women, showed a higher proportion of elevated TSH, and reduced FT4, FT3 and T3 than men with AUD. The level of thyroid hormone in patients with AIPD was higher than that in patients with Non-AIPD, and after detoxification treatment, thyroid function may not necessarily return to normal, but showed a trend of thyroid hormone decreased and TSH increased, which was more pronounced in AIPD patients.
Conclusion: AUD can lead to thyroid dysfunction. Patients with AUD should closely monitor their thyroid hormone levels to prevent the worsening of psychiatric and neurological symptoms.
{"title":"Thyroid function in alcohol use disorder: a case-control and longitudinal study of gender, Alcohol-Induced Psychotic Disorders, and detoxification effects.","authors":"Qing Yu, Caihong Ye, Sili Wang, Zhenzhou Zheng, Quansheng Sun, Yuanbin Wang","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2025.2581471","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2025.2581471","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective case-control study we enrolled 283 patients with AUD (261 men, 22 women) admitted between 2021 and 2024, of whom 80 had AIPD. Baseline levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (FT4), free triiodothyronine (FT3), thyroxine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3) were measured at the time of admission. A second measurement was performed three to four weeks after detoxification. Baseline values were compared with those of 300 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Longitudinal changes within the AUD cohort and differences between AIPD and non-AIPD subgroups were analyzed by paired t-tests and chi-square tests as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean serum levels of FT4, FT3, T4 and T3 were significantly lower in AUD patients than in healthy controls, while TSH had no significant change. In the same comparison, the proportion of individuals with abnormal thyroid parameters was higher in the AUD group than in controls. Among AUD patients, women, showed a higher proportion of elevated TSH, and reduced FT4, FT3 and T3 than men with AUD. The level of thyroid hormone in patients with AIPD was higher than that in patients with Non-AIPD, and after detoxification treatment, thyroid function may not necessarily return to normal, but showed a trend of thyroid hormone decreased and TSH increased, which was more pronounced in AIPD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AUD can lead to thyroid dysfunction. Patients with AUD should closely monitor their thyroid hormone levels to prevent the worsening of psychiatric and neurological symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145490569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Women in their 50s and early 60s experience significant, unique life events that may affect their alcohol use. This complex period in a woman's life has co-occurring stressors that can affect alcohol use. Little is understood with regards to what predictors influence the alcohol use of women in this age group.
Objective: The objective of the study was to conduct an exploratory quantitative analysis to determine the social, physical and psychological predictors of increased daily alcohol use of women aged between 50 and 62 years.
Methods: The research sample of women aged 50-62 years was extracted across three waves of data from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Aging (TILDA) collected from Wave 1 (2010) (n = 893), Wave 3 (2014) (n = 709) and Wave 5 (2018) (n = 579). Repeated measures analysis was conducted across Wave 1, 3 and 5 on the women's alcohol use as they age over eight years. Multiple regression analysis within the waves examined demographic and biopsychosocial predictive factors with daily alcohol use.
Results: Repeated measures analysis showed that women's alcohol use remained fixed and did not significantly change from 50 to 62 years. Multiple regression analysis on demographic and biopsychological factors found that factors of social connectedness were the most significant predictor of lower daily alcohol use.
Conclusions: Social connectedness, specifically attending religious services and club membership were the most significant predictors of lower daily alcohol use. Therefore, social connectedness is an important factor to consider when providing healthcare and support to women in their 50s and 60s.
{"title":"An exploratory analysis of social connectedness and alcohol use of mature women.","authors":"Grainne Clarke, Pauline Hyland, Catherine Comiskey","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2025.2574911","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2025.2574911","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women in their 50s and early 60s experience significant, unique life events that may affect their alcohol use. This complex period in a woman's life has co-occurring stressors that can affect alcohol use. Little is understood with regards to what predictors influence the alcohol use of women in this age group.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the study was to conduct an exploratory quantitative analysis to determine the social, physical and psychological predictors of increased daily alcohol use of women aged between 50 and 62 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research sample of women aged 50-62 years was extracted across three waves of data from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Aging (TILDA) collected from Wave 1 (2010) (<i>n</i> = 893), Wave 3 (2014) (<i>n</i> = 709) and Wave 5 (2018) (<i>n</i> = 579). Repeated measures analysis was conducted across Wave 1, 3 and 5 on the women's alcohol use as they age over eight years. Multiple regression analysis within the waves examined demographic and biopsychosocial predictive factors with daily alcohol use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated measures analysis showed that women's alcohol use remained fixed and did not significantly change from 50 to 62 years. Multiple regression analysis on demographic and biopsychological factors found that factors of social connectedness were the most significant predictor of lower daily alcohol use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social connectedness, specifically attending religious services and club membership were the most significant predictors of lower daily alcohol use. Therefore, social connectedness is an important factor to consider when providing healthcare and support to women in their 50s and 60s.</p>","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145472208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-31DOI: 10.1080/10550887.2025.2573362
Sidharth Mishra, Sayali Mishra, Sibanarayan Rath
Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is an escalating global public health issue, especially amid growing legalization. Despite its cognitive, psychological, and social harms, many individuals with CUD do not access treatment, often due to stigma, limited awareness, or service inaccessibility. Brief Motivational Interventions (BMIs), based on motivational interviewing, offer a promising, accessible, and cost-effective approach to addressing CUD in routine clinical settings. However, qualitative evidence on the practical implementation and perceived effectiveness of BMIs remains limited. This systematic review aims to synthesize qualitative evidence on the barriers and facilitators to implementing and delivering BMIs for CUD in routine practice, as perceived by healthcare providers, patients, and other stakeholders. A systematic search will be conducted across PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus. The search strategy will incorporate four conceptual domains: cannabis use disorder, brief motivational interventions, implementation/perceptions, and clinical setting. Eligible studies will include qualitative or mixed-methods designs with distinct qualitative components, published in English since 2000. Methodological quality will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist, and data will be synthesized using thematic synthesis. The review will identify key contextual factors influencing BMI adoption and success, offering evidence to guide policy, professional training, and implementation strategies for improving cannabis intervention practices. This review highlights that successful implementation of Brief Motivational Interventions for Cannabis Use Disorder depends on provider readiness, training adequacy, systemic support, and culturally sensitive approaches. Addressing these multilevel factors is essential for wider adoption in clinical practice.
大麻使用障碍(CUD)是一个不断升级的全球公共卫生问题,特别是在大麻合法化日益严重的情况下。尽管存在认知、心理和社会危害,但许多CUD患者无法获得治疗,通常是由于污名化、意识有限或无法获得服务。基于动机性访谈的简短动机性干预(BMIs)为常规临床环境中处理CUD提供了一种有前途的、可获得的、具有成本效益的方法。然而,关于bmi的实际实施和感知有效性的定性证据仍然有限。本系统综述旨在综合定性证据,证明在常规实践中实施和交付CUD bmi的障碍和促进因素,正如医疗保健提供者、患者和其他利益相关者所感知的那样。系统搜索将在PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science和Scopus中进行。搜索策略将包括四个概念领域:大麻使用障碍,简短动机干预,实施/感知和临床环境。合格的研究将包括自2000年以来以英文发表的具有不同定性成分的定性或混合方法设计。方法学质量将使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)检查表进行评估,数据将使用主题综合进行综合。该审查将确定影响BMI采用和成功的关键背景因素,为指导政策、专业培训和改进大麻干预实践的实施策略提供证据。这篇综述强调,大麻使用障碍的简短动机干预的成功实施取决于提供者的准备、培训的充足性、系统的支持和文化敏感的方法。解决这些多层次因素对于在临床实践中广泛采用是必不可少的。
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators to implementing brief motivational interventions for cannabis use disorder in routine practice: a systematic review.","authors":"Sidharth Mishra, Sayali Mishra, Sibanarayan Rath","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2025.2573362","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2025.2573362","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is an escalating global public health issue, especially amid growing legalization. Despite its cognitive, psychological, and social harms, many individuals with CUD do not access treatment, often due to stigma, limited awareness, or service inaccessibility. Brief Motivational Interventions (BMIs), based on motivational interviewing, offer a promising, accessible, and cost-effective approach to addressing CUD in routine clinical settings. However, qualitative evidence on the practical implementation and perceived effectiveness of BMIs remains limited. This systematic review aims to synthesize qualitative evidence on the barriers and facilitators to implementing and delivering BMIs for CUD in routine practice, as perceived by healthcare providers, patients, and other stakeholders. A systematic search will be conducted across PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus. The search strategy will incorporate four conceptual domains: cannabis use disorder, brief motivational interventions, implementation/perceptions, and clinical setting. Eligible studies will include qualitative or mixed-methods designs with distinct qualitative components, published in English since 2000. Methodological quality will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist, and data will be synthesized using thematic synthesis. The review will identify key contextual factors influencing BMI adoption and success, offering evidence to guide policy, professional training, and implementation strategies for improving cannabis intervention practices. This review highlights that successful implementation of Brief Motivational Interventions for Cannabis Use Disorder depends on provider readiness, training adequacy, systemic support, and culturally sensitive approaches. Addressing these multilevel factors is essential for wider adoption in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145423302","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-09DOI: 10.1080/10550887.2025.2567902
Muhammet Celik, Ryan Harrington, Christopher Aloezos
Background: Benzodiazepines are widely prescribed, yet their long-term use among patients with substance-use disorders (SUDs) remains poorly understood. This study examined benzodiazepines in a substance use treatment program.
Objectives: This study aims to describe prescribing patterns, tapering and discontinuation characteristics, and return to use rates in SUD patients receiving benzodiazepines in a community-based outpatient substance use treatment program.
Methods: In this single-site, retrospective chart review study, electronic health records of 51 patients, prescribed benzodiazepines between FY 2014-2024, in a community-based outpatient substance use treatment program were analyzed. Demographics, psychiatric and SUD diagnoses, benzodiazepine half-life, dose, taper duration, discontinuation status, and return to use were examined descriptively.
Results: Intermediate-acting BZDs were the most commonly prescribed (68.6%), with limited attempts to switch to longer-acting agents. BZD prescriptions were discontinued in only 25.4% of cases, and 38.4% of those who discontinued returned to use. Patients who successfully tapered had longer down-titration durations compared to those who returned to use. (5.4 months vs. 2.2 months in return to use cases). Among patients with benzodiazepine use disorder, return to use occurred in 50.0% of those who discontinued. The patient population demonstrated notably high rates of psychiatric comorbidities and previous psychiatric hospitalizations.
Conclusions: In patients with SUDs, benzodiazepine discontinuation is uncommon and frequently followed by return to use. Brief tapers show little benefit. Our data support that successful BZD tapering may require prolonged, structured tapering within integrated mental-health and substance use care to minimize return to use.
{"title":"Brief report: a retrospective chart review of benzodiazepine prescription patterns, discontinuation, and return-to-use over a decade in a community outpatient substance use treatment program.","authors":"Muhammet Celik, Ryan Harrington, Christopher Aloezos","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2025.2567902","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2025.2567902","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benzodiazepines are widely prescribed, yet their long-term use among patients with substance-use disorders (SUDs) remains poorly understood. This study examined benzodiazepines in a substance use treatment program.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to describe prescribing patterns, tapering and discontinuation characteristics, and return to use rates in SUD patients receiving benzodiazepines in a community-based outpatient substance use treatment program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-site, retrospective chart review study, electronic health records of 51 patients, prescribed benzodiazepines between FY 2014-2024, in a community-based outpatient substance use treatment program were analyzed. Demographics, psychiatric and SUD diagnoses, benzodiazepine half-life, dose, taper duration, discontinuation status, and return to use were examined descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intermediate-acting BZDs were the most commonly prescribed (68.6%), with limited attempts to switch to longer-acting agents. BZD prescriptions were discontinued in only 25.4% of cases, and 38.4% of those who discontinued returned to use. Patients who successfully tapered had longer down-titration durations compared to those who returned to use. (5.4 months vs. 2.2 months in return to use cases). Among patients with benzodiazepine use disorder, return to use occurred in 50.0% of those who discontinued. The patient population demonstrated notably high rates of psychiatric comorbidities and previous psychiatric hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with SUDs, benzodiazepine discontinuation is uncommon and frequently followed by return to use. Brief tapers show little benefit. Our data support that successful BZD tapering may require prolonged, structured tapering within integrated mental-health and substance use care to minimize return to use.</p>","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145253230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Substance use disorders (SUDs) are a growing public health concern with high relapse rates. Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques are emerging as potential adjunctive therapies; however, recruitment challenges persist in related clinical trials. To use systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the rate and reasons for nonparticipation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving noninvasive brain stimulation for substance-related and addictive disorders.
Materials and methods: Major databases (PubMed, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar) were searched from inception to January 2025 for RCTs of noninvasive brain stimulation and SUD. Of 3589 abstracts searched, 55 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed, published in English and examined any form of noninvasive brain stimulation in individuals with substance-related or behavioral addictions. Studies were required to report the number of individuals screened and ultimately randomized. Non-randomized studies, those involving invasive brain stimulation, were excluded.Following PRISMA guidelines, data were extracted independently by two reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by a third. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB tool. Random-effects model was used for meta-analysis.
Results: A total of 55 randomized trials were included which involved diverse SUDs and behavioral addictions. The pooled nonparticipation rate was 55.9% (95% CI: 45.9-65.8%; I2 = 99.56%, p < 0.001). Majority of the studies reported craving as an outcome measure. Key reasons included failure to meet inclusion criteria (reported in over 25 studies), refusal to participate due to anxiety or lack of motivation (≥15 studies), and logistical barriers such as travel or session frequency (≥10 studies).
Conclusion: Nonparticipation in noninvasive brain stimulation trials for SUD are high, largely due to stringent eligibility criteria, procedural apprehension, and practical burdens faced by participants. Addressing these barriers through broader inclusion criteria, participant education, incentives, and flexible scheduling is essential to enhance recruitment, trial generalizability, and future clinical applicability of NIBS in addiction treatment.
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the recruitment hurdles and nonparticipation rate in noninvasive brain stimulation for addictive disorders.","authors":"Pinki Sevda, Priyanka Saha, Siddharth Sarkar, Rohit Verma, Naresh Nebhinani","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2025.2564446","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2025.2564446","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Substance use disorders (SUDs) are a growing public health concern with high relapse rates. Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques are emerging as potential adjunctive therapies; however, recruitment challenges persist in related clinical trials. To use systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the rate and reasons for nonparticipation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving noninvasive brain stimulation for substance-related and addictive disorders.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Major databases (PubMed, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar) were searched from inception to January 2025 for RCTs of noninvasive brain stimulation and SUD. Of 3589 abstracts searched, 55 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed, published in English and examined any form of noninvasive brain stimulation in individuals with substance-related or behavioral addictions. Studies were required to report the number of individuals screened and ultimately randomized. Non-randomized studies, those involving invasive brain stimulation, were excluded.Following PRISMA guidelines, data were extracted independently by two reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by a third. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB tool. Random-effects model was used for meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 55 randomized trials were included which involved diverse SUDs and behavioral addictions. The pooled nonparticipation rate was 55.9% (95% CI: 45.9-65.8%; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 99.56%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Majority of the studies reported craving as an outcome measure. Key reasons included failure to meet inclusion criteria (reported in over 25 studies), refusal to participate due to anxiety or lack of motivation (≥15 studies), and logistical barriers such as travel or session frequency (≥10 studies).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nonparticipation in noninvasive brain stimulation trials for SUD are high, largely due to stringent eligibility criteria, procedural apprehension, and practical burdens faced by participants. Addressing these barriers through broader inclusion criteria, participant education, incentives, and flexible scheduling is essential to enhance recruitment, trial generalizability, and future clinical applicability of NIBS in addiction treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145253297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-08DOI: 10.1080/10550887.2025.2560404
Christopher Lomas
Background: Behavioral addictions exhibit convergent dysregulation of meso-striatal reward, cortico-limbic stress, and executive-control circuits. Top-down interventions such as CBT demonstrate moderate, often transient effects, leaving autonomic dysregulation insufficiently targeted. Somatic and body-oriented psychotherapies (SBPs) may remediate these deficits via bottom-up interoceptive and autonomic mechanisms, but quantitative synthesis is lacking.
Methods: Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (total N = 573) of yoga, mindfulness, or somatic interventions for gambling, gaming, or compulsive sexual behavior were systematically reviewed. Hedges' g was pooled using random-effects meta-analysis (DerSimonian-Laird, Hartung-Knapp intervals). Risk-of-bias was evaluated with RoB-2; sensitivity analyses included leave-one-out models.
Results: Pooled effect size indicated a large benefit (g = -2.62, 95% CI [-4.73, -0.51], p = .015), with heterogeneity substantial (I2 = 95.6%). Directionality persisted under sensitivity analyses. No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusions: This review delivers the first quantitative synthesis of SBPs in behavioral addictions, delineating robust short-term symptom reduction alongside preliminary mechanistic signals implicating interoceptive-autonomic and fronto-striatal circuits. A novel phased, biomarker-guided treatment framework is proposed, situating SBPs as adjunctive modulators within integrative addiction care. Future trials should prioritize mechanistic endpoints, longer follow-up, and dismantling designs to isolate active components.
背景:行为成瘾表现出中纹状体奖励、皮质边缘应激和执行控制回路的趋同失调。自上而下的干预,如CBT,显示出适度的,通常是短暂的效果,使自主神经失调没有充分的针对性。躯体和身体导向的心理疗法(sbp)可以通过自下而上的内感受和自主机制来弥补这些缺陷,但缺乏定量的综合。方法:系统回顾了9项随机对照试验(rct)(总N = 573),涉及瑜伽、正念或躯体干预对赌博、游戏或强迫性行为的影响。采用随机效应荟萃分析(dersimonan - laird, Hartung-Knapp区间)汇总对冲数据。用rob2评估偏倚风险;敏感性分析包括留一模型。结果:合并效应大小表明获益较大(g = -2.62, 95% CI [-4.73, -0.51], p = 0.015),异质性较大(I2 = 95.6%)。在敏感性分析中,方向性仍然存在。无严重不良事件报告。结论:这篇综述首次对行为成瘾中的sbp进行了定量合成,描述了短期症状的显著减轻以及涉及内感觉-自主神经和额纹状体回路的初步机制信号。提出了一种新的分阶段、生物标志物指导的治疗框架,将sbp定位为综合成瘾治疗中的辅助调节剂。未来的试验应优先考虑机械终点、更长时间的随访和分离活性成分的拆解设计。
{"title":"Neurophysiological and therapeutic efficacy of somatic psychotherapies in addiction: primary behavioral focus with exploratory cross-addiction analyses.","authors":"Christopher Lomas","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2025.2560404","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2025.2560404","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Behavioral addictions exhibit convergent dysregulation of meso-striatal reward, cortico-limbic stress, and executive-control circuits. Top-down interventions such as CBT demonstrate moderate, often transient effects, leaving autonomic dysregulation insufficiently targeted. Somatic and body-oriented psychotherapies (SBPs) may remediate these deficits <i>via</i> bottom-up interoceptive and autonomic mechanisms, but quantitative synthesis is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (total <i>N</i> = 573) of yoga, mindfulness, or somatic interventions for gambling, gaming, or compulsive sexual behavior were systematically reviewed. Hedges' g was pooled using random-effects meta-analysis (DerSimonian-Laird, Hartung-Knapp intervals). Risk-of-bias was evaluated with RoB-2; sensitivity analyses included leave-one-out models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pooled effect size indicated a large benefit (g = -2.62, 95% CI [-4.73, -0.51], <i>p</i> = .015), with heterogeneity substantial (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 95.6%). Directionality persisted under sensitivity analyses. No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review delivers the first quantitative synthesis of SBPs in behavioral addictions, delineating robust short-term symptom reduction alongside preliminary mechanistic signals implicating interoceptive-autonomic and fronto-striatal circuits. A novel phased, biomarker-guided treatment framework is proposed, situating SBPs as adjunctive modulators within integrative addiction care. Future trials should prioritize mechanistic endpoints, longer follow-up, and dismantling designs to isolate active components.</p>","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145245436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2024-08-21DOI: 10.1080/10550887.2024.2391156
Ilana Hull, Raagini Jawa, Margaret Shang, Corey Davis, Cambria King, Gary McMurtrie, Elizabeth Krans
The rise in pregnancy-related overdose deaths has been driven by the use of high-potency illicitly-manufactured synthetic opioids including fentanyl. Xylazine, a veterinary sedative, is increasingly noted as a common adulterant in the United States illicit opioid supply. Exposure to the xylazine-fentanyl combination has been associated with severe harms including sedation, necrotic wounds, and symptoms of xylazine withdrawal. Due to limited data that directly addresses the risks of xylazine exposure during human pregnancy, we conducted a narrative review to summarize the available evidence about the clinical implications of xylazine exposure in pregnancy drawing from evidence from animal models, the general adult population, and the authors' clinical experiences. Because xylazine exposure presents unique risks to pregnant persons, management of xylazine exposure and related clinical sequelae in pregnant persons warrants nuanced clinical management. Further, additional research is critically needed to develop best practice guidelines related to the management of co-occurring xylazine-opioid exposure during pregnancy including harm reduction strategies to reduce exposure risk during pregnancy.
{"title":"Implications of xylazine exposure in pregnancy: a narrative review.","authors":"Ilana Hull, Raagini Jawa, Margaret Shang, Corey Davis, Cambria King, Gary McMurtrie, Elizabeth Krans","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2024.2391156","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10550887.2024.2391156","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rise in pregnancy-related overdose deaths has been driven by the use of high-potency illicitly-manufactured synthetic opioids including fentanyl. Xylazine, a veterinary sedative, is increasingly noted as a common adulterant in the United States illicit opioid supply. Exposure to the xylazine-fentanyl combination has been associated with severe harms including sedation, necrotic wounds, and symptoms of xylazine withdrawal. Due to limited data that directly addresses the risks of xylazine exposure during human pregnancy, we conducted a narrative review to summarize the available evidence about the clinical implications of xylazine exposure in pregnancy drawing from evidence from animal models, the general adult population, and the authors' clinical experiences. Because xylazine exposure presents unique risks to pregnant persons, management of xylazine exposure and related clinical sequelae in pregnant persons warrants nuanced clinical management. Further, additional research is critically needed to develop best practice guidelines related to the management of co-occurring xylazine-opioid exposure during pregnancy including harm reduction strategies to reduce exposure risk during pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"394-401"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842615/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142009699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-08-19DOI: 10.1080/10550887.2025.2546852
R Gregory Lande
{"title":"The role of artificial intelligence in addiction medicine.","authors":"R Gregory Lande","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2025.2546852","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10550887.2025.2546852","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"299-300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144875984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: Determine if long-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAIB) can be successfully and safely administered in the hospital with minimal sublingual buprenorphine lead-in and potentially improve follow-up engagement in care.
Methods: We performed a retrospective case series of 46 patients who received LAIB while hospitalized at a safety-net community hospital. We abstracted demographic information, details about substance use disorder treatment history, in-hospital buprenorphine initiation methods and follow-up data from inpatient and outpatient electronic medical records.
Results: In total, 46 hospitalized patients received LAIB during the study period. The majority of our patients were older Black adults with Medicaid who self-reported intranasal heroin use. A low-dose buprenorphine initiation protocol was used most commonly, either in sublingual or intravenous form, with only two cases of precipitated withdrawal occurring during the buprenorphine initiation process and no cases of precipitated withdrawal after the administration of LAIB. 87% (40) of the patients received LAIB after receiving either sublingual or IV buprenorphine for fewer than the recommended seven days. Of the 46 hospitalized patients who received LAIB, 23 (50%) attended a follow-up addiction medicine appointment within 30 days of discharge.
Conclusions: Hospital administration of LAIB could play an important role in retention in care after hospital discharge.
{"title":"Inpatient initiation of long-acting injectable buprenorphine at a community hospital: A retrospective case series.","authors":"Clarissa O'Conor, Shai Farhi, Ethan Cowan, Ruchi Fitzgerald","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2024.2391145","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10550887.2024.2391145","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Determine if long-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAIB) can be successfully and safely administered in the hospital with minimal sublingual buprenorphine lead-in and potentially improve follow-up engagement in care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective case series of 46 patients who received LAIB while hospitalized at a safety-net community hospital. We abstracted demographic information, details about substance use disorder treatment history, in-hospital buprenorphine initiation methods and follow-up data from inpatient and outpatient electronic medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 46 hospitalized patients received LAIB during the study period. The majority of our patients were older Black adults with Medicaid who self-reported intranasal heroin use. A low-dose buprenorphine initiation protocol was used most commonly, either in sublingual or intravenous form, with only two cases of precipitated withdrawal occurring during the buprenorphine initiation process and no cases of precipitated withdrawal after the administration of LAIB. 87% (40) of the patients received LAIB after receiving either sublingual or IV buprenorphine for fewer than the recommended seven days. Of the 46 hospitalized patients who received LAIB, 23 (50%) attended a follow-up addiction medicine appointment within 30 days of discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hospital administration of LAIB could play an important role in retention in care after hospital discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"338-344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142113335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}