Journal of Addictive Diseases最新文献

Fentanyl has emerged as the leading cause of fatal drug overdoses in the U.S. Individuals misusing drugs may not always be aware of exposure to fentanyl.

To determine the prevalence of fentanyl use and extent of awareness of fentanyl exposure among a national sample of treatment-seeking individuals with opioid use disorder (n = 1098).

Participants provided oral fluid and urine specimens, which were tested for drugs by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Participants also provided self-reports of fentanyl use.

49.5% tested positive for fentanyl in oral fluid, urine, or both. Of those testing positive for fentanyl, 29.8% were unaware that they had been exposed to fentanyl. Participants testing positive for opioids methadone, and specifically 6-monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM), a unique metabolite of heroin, were significantly more likely to be unaware of fentanyl exposure than participants testing negative for these substances, with a similar trend for oxycodone and tramadol.

These findings may be due to fentanyl's effect being difficult to distinguish from that of other opioids, whereas when other types of drugs are adulterated with fentanyl, the differences in effects are likely to be readily discernable. These results support the importance of expanded drug-checking services.

Background: Cannabis use frequently starts during adolescence and young adulthood and can induce psychosocial and health consequences. Young people constitute hard-to-reach populations. Emergency departments could constitute a key care setting to identify cannabis use and its consequences among young people.

Objectives: To estimate the rate of cannabis use in the 16- to 25-year-old population visiting the emergency department for any reason and to assess the psychosocial factors associated with cannabis use.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study among young people who attended the emergency department, over 5-months. Data were sociodemographic characteristics, self-administered questionnaires for problematic substance use screening, and urine drug screening samples. They were classified in the cannabis use (CU) group if they had a positive urine screen or reported cannabis use in the previous month. Characteristics of individuals in the CU and non-CU groups were compared.

Results: A total of 460 participants were included, of whom 105 were in the CU group. Cannabis users were more likely to be male (aOR = 1.85; [1.18-2.90]), to be unemployed (aOR = 1.77; [1.03-3.04]), to have a lower mental health status score (aOR = 0. 82; [0.75-0.90]), to report a history of sexual abuse (aOR = 2.99; [1.70-5.25]), and to have a positive AUDIT screen (aOR = 4.23; [2.61-6.86]).

Conclusions: The emergency department is a primary care setting for young people, which is conducive to screening for substance use. Cannabis users can be assessed and referred to adapt their treatment, given their lack of adherence to the traditional addictology care system.

Background: Substance use is common among U.S. military veterans and veterans are at high risk for negative consequences associated with substance use, such as injection-related infections and overdose. Although harm reduction services (HRS) are highly evidence-based, implementation in traditional healthcare settings has been limited. This formative, qualitative study sought to identify barriers and facilitators to the integration of HRS and identify appropriate implementation strategies to support the optimized integration of a comprehensive bundle of HRS in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

Methods: Semi-structured interviews explored how harm reduction is currently understood by VHA providers and elicited input on perceived facilitators and barriers to implementation. Data were analyzed using a directed content analysis and the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) implementation framework was used to organize findings. Results were then mapped to relevant implementation strategies using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research - Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (CFIR - ERIC) tool.

Results: 15 interviews with VHA providers were conducted across 5 sites. Respondents reported that current HRS are fragmented and dependent on the knowledge, time, and comfort level of individual providers. Stigma around substance use at the patient, provider, and institutional levels was noted to be a key barrier to HRS adoption. Based on identified barriers and facilitators, strategies that may be effective for increasing adoption of HRS include engagement of champions, communication and educational strategies, and adaptation of existing infrastructure.

Conclusions: Many of the barriers identified in this formative study may be addressed using evidence-based implementation strategies. Additional research is needed to identify implementation strategies that are effective for addressing stigma, which is perceived to be a persistent challenge to the provision of integrated harm reduction services.

The relationships between peer bullying victimization in adolescence and substance use have been poorly studied. Thus, we examined the associations between peer bullying victimization and tobacco, alcohol and cannabis use in 496 French high school students. Peer bullying victimization was measured with a 17-item standardized assessment and analyzed as quartiles. Tobacco, alcohol, and cannabis use were assessed with the Hooked on Nicotine Checklist (HONC), the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) and the Cannabis Abuse Screening Test (CAST), respectively. Total scores at the HONC (0 to 10), AUDIT-C (0 to 12), and CAST (0 to 24) were used as dependent variables in generalized linear models, adjusting for sex, age, prepared graduation, last school marks and friends outside high school. Compared to the first quartile (i.e., the least bullied students), those from the second, third and fourth quartiles had significant increase of the AUDIT-C (B = 0.78 [95%CI 0.17-1.40] with p = 0.013; B = 0.86 [95%CI 0.26;1.46] with p = 0.005 and B = 1.00 [95%CI 0.38;1.62] with p = 0.002, respectively), with dose-dependent relationships (B = 0.33 ([95%CI 0.13; 0.52] with p = 0.001). Those from the fourth quartile had a significant increase of the CAST (B = 2.13[95%CI 1.25;3.01], p < 0.001). When examining the role of peer bullying victimization on the number of substances used, there were significant increased odds for students from the third and fourth quartiles, with dose-dependent relationships (OR = 1.24 [95% CI 1.07;1.44], p = 0.005). These findings encourage paying a particular attention to substance use in students who report being bullied. Consequently, information and prevention using standardized screening tools should be proposed. Conversely, substance use could be an indicator of peer bullying victimization and should thus be explored.

Background: Low distress tolerance may result in greater vulnerability to problematic cannabis use. However, the role of the primary form of cannabis used has not been examined as a moderator of this association. While marijuana flower remains the preferred form of cannabis, the popularity of other forms of cannabis, including concentrates and edibles, is on the rise.

Objectives: We examined the association between distress tolerance and problematic cannabis use and whether the primary form of cannabis used moderates this relationship.

Methods: Participants were 695 (67.6% male) past-month cannabis users who completed an online survey. Multiple linear regressions assessed whether distress tolerance, the primary form of cannabis used, and their interaction were related to problematic cannabis use while controlling for demographic variables and past 30-day alcohol and cannabis use frequency.

Results: Lower tolerance for distress was associated with more problematic cannabis use. Endorsing concentrates as the primary form of cannabis used vs. marijuana flower was related to more problematic cannabis use while reporting edibles as the primary form of cannabis used vs. marijuana flower or concentrates was related to less problematic cannabis use. Individuals preferring marijuana flower or concentrates reported more problematic cannabis use at lower levels of distress tolerance.

Conclusions: Cannabis users exhibiting low distress tolerance or a preference for concentrates may be at greatest risk for experiencing negative consequences related to their cannabis use. Additionally, building tolerance for stressful situations, among both concentrates and marijuana flower users, may aid in minimizing problematic cannabis use.

Background: Excessive alcohol drinking negatively affects bone metabolism and leads to a risk of decreased bone mass, which is a major component of the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. However, the potential influence of alcohol on bones has not been fully recognized, particularly among the young to middle-aged generation.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the status of serum markers related to bone metabolism in young to middle-aged women with alcohol use disorder (AUD).

Methods: Levels of vitamin D and the bone-resorption marker tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b were measured in the sera of 25 women with AUD (mean age, 39.5 ± 7.5 years) who were enrolled in an AUD rehabilitation program. Data of samples obtained on admission and those after eight weeks were compared.

Results: Of the 25 women with AUD, 19 (76%) had vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL), and most of the patients showed relatively higher tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b levels at baseline considering their premenopausal age. Although the levels did not change significantly at week eight of the AUD rehabilitation program, vitamin D levels tended to increase initially in patients with vitamin D deficiency. Although further investigations and detailed nutritional assessment are necessary, the results of this study may support the presence of a relatively unknown influence of AUD on the bone health of the young to middle-aged population. Along with psychological and physical care, persons with AUD should be treated as a high-risk group for future osteoporosis regardless of age.

Because of the stigma surrounding patients with substance use disorder (SUD) and difficulties with follow-up, data on outcomes is limited. We explore real-world data from a prospectively collected database to determine characteristics that contribute to the completion of acute treatment. Our cohort consisted of data from 1039 patients treated at a single facility. Success was defined as successful discharge from the program. Failure was defined as relapse or signing out against medical advice during treatment. We examined 43 distinct features collected at time of treatment using multivariate analysis. In the total cohort and both sexes, longer length of stay (p ≤ 0.01) was linked to treatment failure. When we examined the cohort by sex, variables associated with success and failure differed between groups. Among females, goal-directed thinking (p ≤ 0.05) correlated with treatment success. Taking unnecessary risks (p < 0.05), having a detailed suicide plan (p ≤ 0.001), and constricted thinking (p ≤ 0.01) predicted treatment failure. In males, prior arrest for driving under the influence (p ≤ 0.05), and presence of phobias, paranoias, and delusions (p ≤ 0.05) were associated with treatment failure. Identifying patients prone to acute therapy failure may guide more personalized treatment, thereby increasing success rates. When considering SUD treatments for patients, we must stratify based on patient characteristics.

Background: The emergence of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS), including synthetic psilocybin, has raised concern among health experts due to the numerous health and socioeconomic consequences. The current trend is shifting to the hazardous use of synthetic psilocybin in vaping, and little is known about the prevalence of use, specifically among amphetamine-type stimulants (ATS) users.

Methods: Interviewer-administered questionnaires were conducted in drug detention centers between March and October 2022. The study was conducted using ASSIST 3.0 and obtained information on the respondents' socio-demographic characteristics and clinical profiles. N = 355 ATS users were enrolled in this study.

Results: The results show a high prevalence of psilocybin vaping among ATS users (182/355, 53.1%). Most of the respondents were males (85.1%) and unmarried (69.3%), with a mean age of 29.2 (SD = 7.3). Across all respondents, five factors were associated with psilocybin vaping: tobacco smoking, aOR =5.790 (95% CI: 1.723, 8.183); cannabis uses, aOR= 9.152 (95% CI: 2.693, 10.396); and alcohol use, aOR= 3.137 (95% CI: 1.461, 5.817). Respondents of the Malay race had higher odds of being involved in psilocybin vaping compared to other races, with aOR= 1.638 (0.043, 2.459). Meanwhile, a reduction in age by 1.9 will increase the likelihood of involvement in psilocybin vaping with aOR = 1.897 (95% CI: 0.857, 1.938).

Conclusion: Psilocybin in vaping is growing among ATS users and across all populations. Unfortunately, knowledge regarding the long-term effects on health is limited. Further studies should highlight the harmful effects of psilocybin and the potential risk of psilocybin vaping among the younger population.

Objective: This review aims to synthesize and critically evaluate the existing literature on kratom use and its possible association with induction of psychotic and manic symptoms, in order to identify potential areas for future research that would improve our understanding of the risks of kratom consumption.

Methods: An electronic search was performed using five major databases: including PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and PsycINFO. keywords such as kratom, Mitragyna speciosa, mania, psychosis, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective, case report, and case series. The retrieved articles on initial search were screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria for this study, and then data synthesis was performed to analyze relevant information from the included studies.

Results: Six prior papers were found using (1 case series and 5 case reports). These included 10 cases, involving kratom use association with mania and psychosis. The ages of patients ranged from 28 to 55 years mean age was 38, and (SD 13.74), the majority were males (8 out of 11). Patients had durations of kratom use ranging from 2 wk to 15 years. Significant association was found between kratom use and the worsening of psychotic and manic symptoms in individuals with psychiatric conditions.

Conclusions: Our research highlights the possibility of worsening preexisting psychiatric conditions in the context of kratom use. This study emphasizes the need for clinical evaluation of patients for kratom use. Additional research is required to gain a deeper understanding of the potential mental health implications of kratom use, especially among vulnerable populations.

Introduction: Person-centered care (PCC) is an ethical imperative with eight domains, but operation of some PCC domains in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment has been underexplored.

Objective: We sought to identify strategies for operationalizing eight PCC domains in SUD treatment facilities and themes across these strategies.

Methods: We recruited 36 clients and staff from a large publicly funded behavioral health system for individual, semi-structured qualitative interviews. Interviews explored preferences and care experiences for each PCC domain. We analyzed data using iterative categorization, identifying specific operationalization strategies and themes across operationalization strategies within each domain.

Results: PCC operationalization themes for residential SUD treatment included addressing social vulnerability of clients (e.g., through assistance with housing and navigation of criminal/legal systems), involving peer support specialists (e.g., to provide emotional support and aid transition out of care), supporting the client's family throughout treatment (e.g., providing progress updates; increasing visitation opportunities in residential treatment), and facilitating patient choice within each domain (e.g., treatment type; housing type; roommate preferences in residential treatment.).

Discussion & conclusion: Some PCC operationalization strategies are unique to SUD treatment. Several PCC operationalization strategies applied to multiple domains, suggesting conceptual overlap between domains.