Modern Law Review最新文献

英文中文

The Second‐class Citizen in Legal Theory 法学理论中的二等公民

4区社会学 Q1 LAW

Modern Law Review

Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12839

Jack Samuel

The Modern Law ReviewEarly View REVIEW ARTICLE The Second-class Citizen in Legal Theory Jack Samuel, Jack Samuel orcid.org/0000-0003-0639-0778 NYU School of Law. The author would like to thank Colin Bradley, David Dyzenhaus, Eleanor Gordon-Smith, Aaron Jaslove, Felipe Jiménez, Mattias Kumm, and two anonymous reviewers for this journal for helpful discussions and feedback.Search for more papers by this author Jack Samuel, Jack Samuel orcid.org/0000-0003-0639-0778 NYU School of Law. The author would like to thank Colin Bradley, David Dyzenhaus, Eleanor Gordon-Smith, Aaron Jaslove, Felipe Jiménez, Mattias Kumm, and two anonymous reviewers for this journal for helpful discussions and feedback.Search for more papers by this author First published: 27 September 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12839 Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue RelatedInformation

《现代法学评论》早期评论文章《法学理论中的二等公民》杰克·塞缪尔，杰克·塞缪尔orcid.org/0000-0003-0639-0778纽约大学法学院。作者要感谢Colin Bradley、David Dyzenhaus、Eleanor Gordon-Smith、Aaron Jaslove、Felipe jimsamnez、Mattias Kumm和两位匿名审稿人的讨论和反馈。搜索作者Jack Samuel的更多论文，Jack Samuel orcid.org/0000-0003-0639-0778纽约大学法学院。作者要感谢Colin Bradley、David Dyzenhaus、Eleanor Gordon-Smith、Aaron Jaslove、Felipe jimsamnez、Mattias Kumm和两位匿名审稿人的讨论和反馈。搜索该作者的更多论文首次发表:2023年9月27日https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12839阅读全文taboutpdf ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare给予accessShare全文accessShare全文accessShare全文accessShare请查看我们的使用条款和条件，并勾选下面的复选框共享文章的全文版本。我已经阅读并接受了Wiley在线图书馆使用共享链接的条款和条件，请使用下面的链接与您的朋友和同事分享本文的全文版本。学习更多的知识。复制URL共享链接共享onemailfacebooktwitterlinkedinreddit微信早期视图在线版本记录前纳入问题相关信息

{"title":"The Second‐class Citizen in Legal Theory","authors":"Jack Samuel","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12839","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12839","url":null,"abstract":"The Modern Law ReviewEarly View REVIEW ARTICLE The Second-class Citizen in Legal Theory Jack Samuel, Jack Samuel orcid.org/0000-0003-0639-0778 NYU School of Law. The author would like to thank Colin Bradley, David Dyzenhaus, Eleanor Gordon-Smith, Aaron Jaslove, Felipe Jiménez, Mattias Kumm, and two anonymous reviewers for this journal for helpful discussions and feedback.Search for more papers by this author Jack Samuel, Jack Samuel orcid.org/0000-0003-0639-0778 NYU School of Law. The author would like to thank Colin Bradley, David Dyzenhaus, Eleanor Gordon-Smith, Aaron Jaslove, Felipe Jiménez, Mattias Kumm, and two anonymous reviewers for this journal for helpful discussions and feedback.Search for more papers by this author First published: 27 September 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12839 Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue RelatedInformation","PeriodicalId":47530,"journal":{"name":"Modern Law Review","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135580764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Evolution of Birth Registration in England and Wales and its Place in Contemporary Law and Society 英格兰和威尔士出生登记制度的演变及其在当代法律和社会中的地位

4区社会学 Q1 LAW

Modern Law Review

Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12836

Liam Davis

Birth registration, especially the birth certificate, is consistently framed as something which has always operated to document a person's parents and their (biogenetic) ‘origins’. This framing has become more prominent in recent years with the rise in (often queer) families challenging how law should register their families, often being unsuccessful. Analysing the history of birth registration, though, suggests this framing of birth registration is inaccurate. It is only in recent years that birth registration has supposedly taken on a new (or additional) policy aim of facilitating parent‐child relationships. This policy also arguably facilitates a particular type of relationship and trans‐parent families are focused upon as an example of where such facilitation does not occur. Through documenting the recent resurgence of interest in birth registration, this article aims to clarify the history and purpose(s) of birth registration showing how many assumptions surrounding the function of birth registration are misguided, and to open up discussion as to what its legal purpose(s) should be.

出生登记，尤其是出生证明，一直被认为是用来记录一个人的父母及其(生物遗传学)“起源”的东西。近年来，随着越来越多的(通常是酷儿)家庭挑战法律应该如何登记他们的家庭，这种框架变得更加突出，通常是不成功的。然而，分析出生登记的历史表明，这种出生登记的框架是不准确的。直到最近几年，出生登记才被认为是促进亲子关系的一个新的(或额外的)政策目标。这一政策也有可能促进一种特定类型的关系，而跨父母家庭被作为一个例子来关注，这种促进不会发生。通过记录最近对出生登记的兴趣的复苏，本文旨在澄清出生登记的历史和目的，表明围绕出生登记功能的许多假设是错误的，并就其法律目的应该是什么展开讨论。

引用次数: 0

Beverley Clough, The Spaces of Mental Capacity Law: Moving Beyond Binaries, Routledge, 2021, hb, 208 pp, £130.00 贝弗利·克拉夫:《心理能力法的空间:超越二元性》，劳特利奇出版社，2021,hb, 208页，130.00英镑

4区社会学 Q1 LAW

Modern Law Review

Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12838

Magdalena Furgalska

The Modern Law ReviewEarly View BOOK REVIEW Beverley Clough, The Spaces of Mental Capacity Law: Moving Beyond Binaries, Routledge, 2021, hb, 208 pp, £130.00 Magdalena Furgalska, Corresponding Author Magdalena Furgalska [email protected] York Law School. Correspondence Magdalena Furgalska, York Law School [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Magdalena Furgalska, Corresponding Author Magdalena Furgalska [email protected] York Law School. Correspondence Magdalena Furgalska, York Law School [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 25 September 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12838 Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue RelatedInformation

贝弗利·克拉夫，《心理能力法的空间:超越二元性》，劳特利奇出版社，2021,hb, 208页，130.00英镑。Magdalena Furgalska，约克法学院通讯作者Magdalena Furgalska [email protected]搜索作者Magdalena Furgalska的更多论文。通信Magdalena Furgalska，约克法学院[email protected]搜索作者的更多论文首次发表:2023年9月25日https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12838阅读全文taboutpdf ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare给予accessShare全文accessShare全文accessShare全文accessShare请查看我们的使用条款和条件，并在下面的复选框中选择分享文章的全文版本。我已经阅读并接受了Wiley在线图书馆使用共享链接的条款和条件，请使用下面的链接与您的朋友和同事分享本文的全文版本。学习更多的知识。复制URL共享链接共享onemailfacebooktwitterlinkedinreddit微信早期视图在线版本记录前纳入问题相关信息

{"title":"Beverley Clough, The Spaces of Mental Capacity Law: Moving Beyond Binaries, Routledge, 2021, hb, 208 pp, £130.00","authors":"Magdalena Furgalska","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12838","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12838","url":null,"abstract":"The Modern Law ReviewEarly View BOOK REVIEW Beverley Clough, The Spaces of Mental Capacity Law: Moving Beyond Binaries, Routledge, 2021, hb, 208 pp, £130.00 Magdalena Furgalska, Corresponding Author Magdalena Furgalska [email protected] York Law School. Correspondence Magdalena Furgalska, York Law School [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Magdalena Furgalska, Corresponding Author Magdalena Furgalska [email protected] York Law School. Correspondence Magdalena Furgalska, York Law School [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 25 September 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12838 Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue RelatedInformation","PeriodicalId":47530,"journal":{"name":"Modern Law Review","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135816831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Rafael N.Fasel and Sean C.Butler, Animal Rights Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2023, 240 pp, pb £24.99 拉斐尔·法塞尔和肖恩·巴特勒，《动物权利法》，牛津:哈特出版社，2023年版，240页，24.99英镑

4区社会学 Q1 LAW

Modern Law Review

Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12840

Katy Sowery

The Modern Law ReviewEarly View BOOK REVIEW Rafael N. Fasel and Sean C. Butler, Animal Rights Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2023, 240 pp, pb £24.99 Katy Sowery, Corresponding Author Katy Sowery [email protected] University of Liverpool Law School. Correspondence Katy Sowery, University of Liverpool Law School. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Katy Sowery, Corresponding Author Katy Sowery [email protected] University of Liverpool Law School. Correspondence Katy Sowery, University of Liverpool Law School. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 25 September 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12840 Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue RelatedInformation

《现代法律评论》早期书评拉斐尔·法塞尔和肖恩·c·巴特勒，《动物权利法》，牛津:哈特出版社，2023年，240页，pb£24.99。凯蒂·索尔里，利物浦大学法学院。电子邮件:[Email protected]搜索本文作者Katy Sowery的更多论文，通讯作者Katy Sowery [Email protected]利物浦大学法学院。凯蒂·索尔里，利物浦大学法学院。邮箱:[Email protected]搜索该作者的更多论文首次发表:2023年9月25日https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12840阅读全文taboutpdf ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare给予accessShare全文accessShare全文accessShare全文accessShare请查看我们的使用条款和条件，并勾选下面的复选框共享文章的全文版本。我已经阅读并接受了Wiley在线图书馆使用共享链接的条款和条件，请使用下面的链接与您的朋友和同事分享本文的全文版本。学习更多的知识。复制URL共享链接共享onemailfacebooktwitterlinkedinreddit微信早期视图在线版本记录前纳入问题相关信息

{"title":"Rafael N.Fasel and Sean C.Butler, Animal Rights Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2023, 240 pp, pb £24.99","authors":"Katy Sowery","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12840","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12840","url":null,"abstract":"The Modern Law ReviewEarly View BOOK REVIEW Rafael N. Fasel and Sean C. Butler, Animal Rights Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2023, 240 pp, pb £24.99 Katy Sowery, Corresponding Author Katy Sowery [email protected] University of Liverpool Law School. Correspondence Katy Sowery, University of Liverpool Law School. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Katy Sowery, Corresponding Author Katy Sowery [email protected] University of Liverpool Law School. Correspondence Katy Sowery, University of Liverpool Law School. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 25 September 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12840 Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue RelatedInformation","PeriodicalId":47530,"journal":{"name":"Modern Law Review","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135816060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

[Prevalence, age and gender features of chronic kidney disease in patients with diabetes mellitus]. [糖尿病患者慢性肾病的发病率、年龄和性别特征]。

IF 0.3 4区社会学 Q1 LAW

Modern Law Review

Pub Date : 2023-08-17 DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2023.06.202242

I T Murkamilov, K A Aitbaev, V V Fomin

Aim: To study the prevalence, age and gender characteristics of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).

Materials and methods: In a case-control study, clinical and laboratory data were analyzed in 683 patients with DM (4.6% of patients with type 1 DM and 95.4% with type 2 DM) and kidney damage. The indicators of anthropometry, hemodynamics and biochemistry were studied. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated using the CKD-EPI formula.

Results: The proportion of middle-aged and elderly patients with CKD was the most numerous, amounting to 39 and 38%, respectively. At the same time, anemia was more common in young people, and hypercholesterolemia (35.0%), proteinuria (47.5%) and signs of renal failure (45.0%) - in middle-aged patients with CKD. 47.0% study participants had C1 and C2 categories of changes in renal function. Mean levels of systolic blood pressure (BP), the prevalence of proteinuria were statistically significantly higher in women. When evaluating the correlations, we found statistically significant relationships between the calculated GFR and the level of body mass index, systolic BP, venous blood glucose and Hb in the subgroup of men. Among females, a significant relationship between the calculated GFR value was revealed with indicators of systolic and diastolic BP, venous blood glucose and Hb concentration.

Conclusion: Our data indicate the existence of differences in the prevalence of CKD and associated risk factors for the progression of renal failure, depending on gender differences and living conditions of patients. In urban residents, CKD was most often associated with arterial hypertension and renal failure, while overweight, obesity, and proteinuria were significantly more common in rural areas. The incidence of proteinuria and mean levels of systolic BP were significantly higher in females. Further study of the issue under discussion seems promising from the standpoint of a personalized approach and the search for a new preventive strategy to combat both end-stage renal failure and its complications.

目的：研究慢性肾脏病（CKD）在糖尿病（DM）患者中的发病率、年龄和性别特征：在一项病例对照研究中，分析了 683 名糖尿病患者（其中 4.6% 为 1 型糖尿病患者，95.4% 为 2 型糖尿病患者）的临床和实验室数据以及肾脏损害情况。研究了人体测量、血液动力学和生物化学指标。采用 CKD-EPI 公式计算肾小球滤过率（GFR）：结果：患有 CKD 的中年和老年患者最多，分别占 39% 和 38%。同时，贫血在年轻人中更为常见，而高胆固醇血症（35.0%）、蛋白尿（47.5%）和肾功能衰竭迹象（45.0%）在中年慢性肾脏病患者中更为常见。47.0%的研究参与者的肾功能变化属于 C1 和 C2 类。据统计，女性的收缩压（BP）平均水平和蛋白尿发生率明显更高。在评估相关性时，我们发现在男性亚组中，计算得出的肾小球滤过率与体重指数、收缩压、静脉血糖和血红蛋白水平之间存在统计学意义上的显著关系。在女性中，计算出的 GFR 值与收缩压和舒张压、静脉血糖和 Hb 浓度等指标之间存在明显关系：我们的数据表明，由于性别差异和患者的生活条件不同，慢性肾功能衰竭的患病率和肾功能衰竭进展的相关风险因素也存在差异。在城市居民中，慢性肾脏病最常与动脉高血压和肾功能衰竭相关，而超重、肥胖和蛋白尿在农村地区则明显更为常见。女性的蛋白尿发生率和收缩压平均水平明显更高。从个性化方法和寻找防治终末期肾衰竭及其并发症的新预防策略的角度来看，进一步研究正在讨论的问题似乎很有希望。

{"title":"[Prevalence, age and gender features of chronic kidney disease in patients with diabetes mellitus].","authors":"I T Murkamilov, K A Aitbaev, V V Fomin","doi":"10.26442/00403660.2023.06.202242","DOIUrl":"10.26442/00403660.2023.06.202242","url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To study the prevalence, age and gender characteristics of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).Materials and methods: In a case-control study, clinical and laboratory data were analyzed in 683 patients with DM (4.6% of patients with type 1 DM and 95.4% with type 2 DM) and kidney damage. The indicators of anthropometry, hemodynamics and biochemistry were studied. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated using the CKD-EPI formula.Results: The proportion of middle-aged and elderly patients with CKD was the most numerous, amounting to 39 and 38%, respectively. At the same time, anemia was more common in young people, and hypercholesterolemia (35.0%), proteinuria (47.5%) and signs of renal failure (45.0%) - in middle-aged patients with CKD. 47.0% study participants had C1 and C2 categories of changes in renal function. Mean levels of systolic blood pressure (BP), the prevalence of proteinuria were statistically significantly higher in women. When evaluating the correlations, we found statistically significant relationships between the calculated GFR and the level of body mass index, systolic BP, venous blood glucose and Hb in the subgroup of men. Among females, a significant relationship between the calculated GFR value was revealed with indicators of systolic and diastolic BP, venous blood glucose and Hb concentration.Conclusion: Our data indicate the existence of differences in the prevalence of CKD and associated risk factors for the progression of renal failure, depending on gender differences and living conditions of patients. In urban residents, CKD was most often associated with arterial hypertension and renal failure, while overweight, obesity, and proteinuria were significantly more common in rural areas. The incidence of proteinuria and mean levels of systolic BP were significantly higher in females. Further study of the issue under discussion seems promising from the standpoint of a personalized approach and the search for a new preventive strategy to combat both end-stage renal failure and its complications.","PeriodicalId":47530,"journal":{"name":"Modern Law Review","volume":"68 1","pages":"481-486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85455332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

RobertStevens, The Laws of Restitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023, 496pp, hb £90.00 罗伯特·史蒂文斯，《赔偿法》，牛津:牛津大学出版社，2023年，496页，hb£90.00

4区社会学 Q1 LAW

Modern Law Review

Pub Date : 2023-06-07 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12822

Sagi Peari

The Modern Law ReviewVolume 86, Issue 5 p. 1302-1306 REVIEWS Robert Stevens, The Laws of Restitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023, 496pp, hb £90.00 Sagi Peari, Corresponding Author Sagi Peari [email protected] University of Western Australia Law School. email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Sagi Peari, Corresponding Author Sagi Peari [email protected] University of Western Australia Law School. email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 07 June 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12822 Section editor: Vanessa Munro [email protected] Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Volume86, Issue5September 2023Pages 1302-1306 RelatedInformation

Robert Stevens, The Laws of restoration, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023, 496pp, hb£90.00 Sagi Peari，通讯作者Sagi Peari [email protected]西澳大学法学院。email: [email protected]搜索作者Sagi Peari的更多论文，通讯作者Sagi Peari [email protected]西澳大利亚大学法学院。email: [email protected]搜索本作者的更多论文首次发布:2023年6月7日https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12822章节编辑:Vanessa Munro [email protected]阅读全文taboutpdf ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare给予accessShare全文accessShare全文accessShare全文accessShare请查看我们的使用条款和条件，并勾选下面的复选框以分享文章的全文版本。我已经阅读并接受了Wiley在线图书馆使用共享链接的条款和条件，请使用下面的链接与您的朋友和同事分享本文的全文版本。学习更多的知识。复制URL共享链接Share onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat第86卷，第5期2023年9月第1302-1306页相关信息

{"title":"RobertStevens, The Laws of Restitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023, 496pp, hb £90.00","authors":"Sagi Peari","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12822","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12822","url":null,"abstract":"The Modern Law ReviewVolume 86, Issue 5 p. 1302-1306 REVIEWS Robert Stevens, The Laws of Restitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023, 496pp, hb £90.00 Sagi Peari, Corresponding Author Sagi Peari [email protected] University of Western Australia Law School. email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Sagi Peari, Corresponding Author Sagi Peari [email protected] University of Western Australia Law School. email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 07 June 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12822 Section editor: Vanessa Munro [email protected] Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Volume86, Issue5September 2023Pages 1302-1306 RelatedInformation","PeriodicalId":47530,"journal":{"name":"Modern Law Review","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135449586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 and Non‐Traditional Families 1990年《人类受精与胚胎法》和非传统家庭

4区社会学 Q1 LAW

Modern Law Review

Pub Date : 2023-05-30 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12818

Kirsty Horsey, Emily Jackson

There is now a broad consensus that reform of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, as amended, has become necessary. Our focus in this legislation article is not on whether the Act needs to be reformed, but on the narrower question of whether the regulation of fertility treatment in the UK does enough to protect the interests of non‐traditional families. The 2008 reforms to the original 1990 Act took some important steps towards inclusivity, for example by deleting the requirement that clinics consider the child's ‘need for a father’ before providing treatment, and enabling two women to be a child's legal parents from birth. Our contention here is that any new legislation should go further in order to recognise and accommodate diverse family forms.

现在有一个广泛的共识，即修订后的《1990年人类受精与胚胎法》的改革是必要的。在这篇立法文章中，我们关注的重点不是该法案是否需要改革，而是更狭隘的问题，即英国对生育治疗的监管是否足以保护非传统家庭的利益。2008年对原1990年法案的改革在包容性方面采取了一些重要步骤，例如，删除了诊所在提供治疗之前必须考虑孩子“需要父亲”的要求，并允许两名妇女从出生起就成为孩子的合法父母。我们的论点是，任何新的立法都应该更进一步，以承认和适应不同的家庭形式。

引用次数: 0

The Beneficiary's Ownership Rights in the Trust Res in a Liberal Property Regime 自由财产制度下信托财产的受益人所有权

4区社会学 Q1 LAW

Modern Law Review

Pub Date : 2023-01-20 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12788

Hanoch Dagan, Irit Samet

This article argues that a liberal theory of property rights can help us resolve a century old debate about a foundational aspect of the trust, namely, the nature of the beneficiary's interest. According to orthodoxy, the beneficiary has a (weak form) of proprietary right to the trust res . But proponents of this view found it hard to defend it from attacks by Maitland and his successors who argue that central aspects of the beneficiary's right imply that the beneficiary's rights should be classified as a personal right against the trustee. The reason for their failure, we argue, is the misguided picture of property rights, as essentially the right to exclude, which they share with proponents of the obligation theory. Liberal property theory, by contrast, gives pride of place to divided ownership, of the kind exemplified by the trust, and accounts for all aspects of the beneficiary's right.

本文认为，一个自由的产权理论可以帮助我们解决一个世纪以来关于信托基础方面的争论，即受益人利益的性质。传统观点认为，受益人对信托财产具有(弱形式的)所有权。但这一观点的支持者发现很难在梅特兰及其继任者的攻击下为其辩护，他们认为受益人权利的核心方面意味着受益人的权利应该被归类为针对受托人的个人权利。我们认为，他们失败的原因在于，他们与义务理论的支持者一样，错误地将财产权视为本质上的排他权。相比之下，自由主义财产理论把分割所有权放在最重要的位置，以信托为例，并解释了受益人权利的各个方面。

引用次数: 0

The UK GDPR, the Immigration Exception and Brexit: Interrogating Open Rights Group v Secretary of State for the Home Department and its Aftermath 英国GDPR，移民例外和英国脱欧:审讯开放权利组织诉内政大臣及其后果

4区社会学 Q1 LAW

Modern Law Review

Pub Date : 2023-01-12 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12784

David Erdos

This note explores the holding, context and aftermath of the judgments which declared the so‐called ʻimmigration exceptionʼ set out in the UK Data Protection Act 2018 incompatible with, and assumed it subject to, the (UK) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) restrictions clause (article 23). The subsequent limitation of this exemption's use to the government is impactful in itself. However, this case has much wider significance. Firstly, the finding that the restrictions clause mandates granular specificity places in jeopardy many exemptions not only in the UK but also in EU States. Secondly, the assumption that this article was engaged is questionable since, as reworded post‐Brexit, it is restricted to limitations laid down in delegated legislation. Nevertheless, this rewording depended on powers limited to addressing post‐Brexit technical ʻdeficienciesʼ and so is ultra vires . The Court of Appeal should have addressed this in order to vindicate the rule of law and separation of powers.

本说明探讨了判决的持有，背景和后果，这些判决宣布英国《2018年数据保护法》中规定的所谓“移民例外”与(英国)一般数据保护条例(GDPR)限制条款(第23条)不兼容，并假设其受(英国)一般数据保护条例(GDPR)限制条款的约束。随后对政府使用这一豁免的限制本身是有影响的。然而，这个案例具有更广泛的意义。首先，限制条款强制规定具体细节的发现，不仅在英国，而且在欧盟国家，都危及许多豁免。其次，这篇文章的假设是有问题的，因为在英国脱欧后重新措辞，它仅限于授权立法中规定的限制。然而，这种重新措辞依赖于解决英国脱欧后技术缺陷的权力，因此是越权的。上诉法院本应处理这一问题，以维护法治和三权分立。

引用次数: 0

The EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement – Exceptional Circumstances or a new Paradigm for EU External Relations? 欧盟-英国贸易与合作协定——特殊情况还是欧盟对外关系的新范式?

IF 0.9 4区社会学 Q1 LAW

Modern Law Review

Pub Date : 2021-10-20 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12698

C. Eckes, Päivi Leino-Sandberg

In the final days of 2020,the European Union and the United Kingdom concluded a Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) covering a broad range of policy areas, including cooperation of law enforcement authorities and social security systems. The EU-UK TCA is unique as concerns the circumstances of its negotiation and adoption, as well as its substance. However, contrary to the argument of the EU institutions,the agreement will have broad implications for the understanding of the EU’s external competence and Member States’ ability to act in areas that are national competence and rely on national budgets. We are critical of the legitimacy of the TCA’s conclusion process, consider that the lack of a deep constitutional analysis of the consequences of EU-only conclusion of the TCA, and of the TCA itself, are problematic, and believe that the choices made are likely to create difficulties for the implementation and enforcement of the agreement.

在2020年的最后几天，欧盟和英国签署了一项涵盖广泛政策领域的贸易与合作协议，包括执法部门和社会保障系统的合作。欧盟-英国TCA在谈判和通过的情况及其实质内容方面是独特的。然而，与欧盟机构的论点相反，该协议将对理解欧盟的外部权限以及成员国在国家权限和依赖国家预算的领域采取行动的能力产生广泛影响。我们对TCA缔结过程的合法性持批评态度，认为对仅由欧盟缔结TCA的后果以及TCA本身缺乏深入的宪法分析是有问题的，并认为所做的选择可能会给协议的实施和执行带来困难。

引用次数: 3

首页上一页

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

Modern Law Review

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀