Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2021.2005458
Mackenzie Sitobata, Masoud Mohammadnezhad
The transition from being a medical student to a fully qualified registered doctor is a challenging time in the lives of intern doctors (IDs). Throughout those challenging times they face many challenges which significantly impact their professional lives as well as their transitional experience. This study aimed to identify the transitional challenges experienced by IDs in Vanuatu. This qualitative study was conducted using a phenomenological approach whereby data collection is done through semi-structured in-depth interviews. Ethical approval was obtained before the commencement of this study. Twenty-seven participants were IDs of Vila Central Hospital and Northern Provincial Hospital in Vanuatu who were either current IDs and had worked for more than 6 months or had completed internship within the past 2 years. The willing IDs were consented on paper before they participated in the interview. The interview data was then transcribed verbatim and interpreted thematically. The participating IDs in the study were between the ages of 27 and 36 years old. Twenty two were current interns while the remaining five had recently completed their internship and now working as registered doctors. Three subthemes were identified as challenges through thematic analysis in this study; intern's welfare not met; different medical training institution; and transitional shock. Those subthemes were later categorized. The study findings have identified that intern's welfare needs improvement along with diverse training medical schools, and the transitional internship encounters were significant challenges experienced by IDs. There is indeed a need for healthcare providers, medical leaders, and relevant stakeholders to recognize and address these challenges.
{"title":"Transitional challenges faced by medical intern doctors (IDs) in Vanuatu: a qualitative study.","authors":"Mackenzie Sitobata, Masoud Mohammadnezhad","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2021.2005458","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.2005458","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The transition from being a medical student to a fully qualified registered doctor is a challenging time in the lives of intern doctors (IDs). Throughout those challenging times they face many challenges which significantly impact their professional lives as well as their transitional experience. This study aimed to identify the transitional challenges experienced by IDs in Vanuatu. This qualitative study was conducted using a phenomenological approach whereby data collection is done through semi-structured in-depth interviews. Ethical approval was obtained before the commencement of this study. Twenty-seven participants were IDs of Vila Central Hospital and Northern Provincial Hospital in Vanuatu who were either current IDs and had worked for more than 6 months or had completed internship within the past 2 years. The willing IDs were consented on paper before they participated in the interview. The interview data was then transcribed verbatim and interpreted thematically. The participating IDs in the study were between the ages of 27 and 36 years old. Twenty two were current interns while the remaining five had recently completed their internship and now working as registered doctors. Three subthemes were identified as challenges through thematic analysis in this study; intern's welfare not met; different medical training institution; and transitional shock. Those subthemes were later categorized. The study findings have identified that intern's welfare needs improvement along with diverse training medical schools, and the transitional internship encounters were significant challenges experienced by IDs. There is indeed a need for healthcare providers, medical leaders, and relevant stakeholders to recognize and address these challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635561/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39924718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: In 2020-2021, residency and fellowship applicants participated in virtual interviews. There was concern that trainees who had not been to the area before would potentially have different satisfaction with their new workplace and community.
Objective: To compare satisfaction and likelihood to recommend work and community among new trainees with or without prior exposure to a single academic center or its environs.
Methods: We conducted an IRB-approved cross-sectional survey of new trainees. An electronic survey included demographic items, self-report of prior exposure to the area, satisfaction with the program and area, and likelihood to recommend the program and area. Descriptive statistics were used for responses and Chi square tests for comparisons.
Results: In September 2021 and May 2022 electronic surveys were sent to all 173 trainees who started residency or fellowship in July 2021, which had 87 responses (50.3% response rate) and 31 (18.0% response rate) responses, respectively. At both times, most respondents were interns. The majority of the September group (55.6%), while 38.7% of the May group had prior exposure to the area. Overall, the majority were satisfied with Penn State Health and would recommend their workplace. The majority also agreed they were satisfied with their new community and would recommend it to others. There were no significant differences in the proportions of satisfied trainees for any of the four outcomes at either timepoint.
Conclusions: Satisfaction with training and the community were not significantly different for trainees with or without prior in-person exposure to the institution or surrounding area.
{"title":"No difference in subsequent trainee satisfaction associated with in-person exposure prior to remote interviews.","authors":"Jocelyn Simmers, Nevada Cox, Beth Herman, Joslyn Kirby","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2022.2122765","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2122765","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2020-2021, residency and fellowship applicants participated in virtual interviews. There was concern that trainees who had not been to the area before would potentially have different satisfaction with their new workplace and community.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare satisfaction and likelihood to recommend work and community among new trainees with or without prior exposure to a single academic center or its environs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an IRB-approved cross-sectional survey of new trainees. An electronic survey included demographic items, self-report of prior exposure to the area, satisfaction with the program and area, and likelihood to recommend the program and area. Descriptive statistics were used for responses and Chi square tests for comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In September 2021 and May 2022 electronic surveys were sent to all 173 trainees who started residency or fellowship in July 2021, which had 87 responses (50.3% response rate) and 31 (18.0% response rate) responses, respectively. At both times, most respondents were interns. The majority of the September group (55.6%), while 38.7% of the May group had prior exposure to the area. Overall, the majority were satisfied with Penn State Health and would recommend their workplace. The majority also agreed they were satisfied with their new community and would recommend it to others. There were no significant differences in the proportions of satisfied trainees for any of the four outcomes at either timepoint.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Satisfaction with training and the community were not significantly different for trainees with or without prior in-person exposure to the institution or surrounding area.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467566/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33449314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2021.2011605
Abraham Gallegos, Lynn K Gordon, Gerardo Moreno, Sue Nahm, Kathleen Brown, Valencia Walker, Vanessa Rangel, Stephanie Clavijo, Alejandra Casillas
Of Being a First Generation (First Gen) college graduate is an important intersectionality which impacts the lens through which First Gen students learn to become physicians. In this Perspective, we define the First Gen identity and review some of the salient First Gen literature as it applies to the medical school experience. We discuss the conception, design and execution of First Gen initiatives and program development at our medical school as a call to action and model for other institutions to create communities for their First Gen populations, focusing on inclusion and tailored support. We describe the framework through which we envisioned our programming for First Gen medical students, trainees, staff, and faculty at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.
{"title":"Visibility & support for first generation college graduates in medicine.","authors":"Abraham Gallegos, Lynn K Gordon, Gerardo Moreno, Sue Nahm, Kathleen Brown, Valencia Walker, Vanessa Rangel, Stephanie Clavijo, Alejandra Casillas","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2021.2011605","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.2011605","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Of Being a First Generation (First Gen) college graduate is an important intersectionality which impacts the lens through which First Gen students learn to become physicians. In this Perspective, we define the First Gen identity and review some of the salient First Gen literature as it applies to the medical school experience. We discuss the conception, design and execution of First Gen initiatives and program development at our medical school as a call to action and model for other institutions to create communities for their First Gen populations, focusing on inclusion and tailored support. We describe the framework through which we envisioned our programming for First Gen medical students, trainees, staff, and faculty at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8725711/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39641937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2021.2016561
Joshua Jauregui, Anthony R Artino, Jonathan S Ilgen, Gail Sullivan, Sandrijn M van Schaik
Experts have described ways to improve peer review quality. Perspectives from expert reviewers are largely absent in the health professions education literature. To gather guidance from expert reviewers, to aid authors striving to publish and reviewers aiming to perform their task effectively. This study surveyed the Journal of Graduate Medical Education (JGME) 'Top Reviewers' from 2017, 2018, and 2019. 'Top Reviewers' perform four or more reviews per year, with high average ratings. Top reviewers were sent an 11-item survey in February 2020. The survey included three demographic questions and eight open-ended, free-text questions about the concepts reviewers most often target in their reviews. We calculated descriptive statistics and performed a thematic analysis of open-ended responses. Of 62 eligible top reviewers, 44 (71%) responded to the survey. Only eight (18.2%) and seven (15.9%) respondents reported having 'stock phrases' or a reviewer template used for reviewer feedback to authors, respectively. The what (research question, methods), how (presentation, writing), and why (relevance, impact) were the resulting themes summarizing how reviewers categorized and responded to common problems. For 'really good papers' reviewers found the what acceptable and focused on how and why. For 'really bad' papers, reviewers focused on big picture feedback, such as the value of the study. Top reviewers from a single health professions education journal appear to have similar approaches to conducting reviews. While most do not use stock phrases or templates, they share similar strategies to differentiate 'good' vs. 'bad' papers through the what, why, and how of a manuscript.
{"title":"Publishing your scholarship: a survey of pearls from top reviewers.","authors":"Joshua Jauregui, Anthony R Artino, Jonathan S Ilgen, Gail Sullivan, Sandrijn M van Schaik","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2021.2016561","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.2016561","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Experts have described ways to improve peer review quality. Perspectives <i>from</i> expert reviewers are largely absent in the health professions education literature. To gather guidance from expert reviewers, to aid authors striving to publish and reviewers aiming to perform their task effectively. This study surveyed <i>the Journal of Graduate Medical Education</i> (JGME) 'Top Reviewers' from 2017, 2018, and 2019. 'Top Reviewers' perform four or more reviews per year, with high average ratings. Top reviewers were sent an 11-item survey in February 2020. The survey included three demographic questions and eight open-ended, free-text questions about the concepts reviewers most often target in their reviews. We calculated descriptive statistics and performed a thematic analysis of open-ended responses. Of 62 eligible top reviewers, 44 (71%) responded to the survey. Only eight (18.2%) and seven (15.9%) respondents reported having 'stock phrases' or a reviewer template used for reviewer feedback to authors, respectively. The <i>what</i> (research question, methods), <i>how</i> (presentation, writing), and <i>why</i> (relevance, impact) were the resulting themes summarizing how reviewers categorized and responded to common problems. For 'really good papers' reviewers found the <i>what</i> acceptable and focused on <i>how</i> and <i>why</i>. For 'really bad' papers, reviewers focused on big picture feedback, such as the value of the study. Top reviewers from a single health professions education journal appear to have similar approaches to conducting reviews. While most do not use stock phrases or templates, they share similar strategies to differentiate 'good' vs. 'bad' papers through the <i>what, why</i>, and <i>how</i> of a manuscript.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8745374/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39670372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2021.2012105
Lori Heginbotham, Gina Baugh, Timothy Lefeber, Linda Friehling, Christy Barnhart, Lee Ann Miller, Lucas Moore, Lesley Cottrell
Introduction: Despite national efforts to establish patient-centered medical homes (PCMH), 57.3% of children with special health care needs are receiving care that does not meet medical home criteria. Project DOCC, a national curriculum designed by parents of children with disabilities or chronic disease, has shown documented strengths in medical resident learner education of children with special health care needs from the parent perspectives for over a decade. Because of the importance of PCMH and the need to provide compassionate care, our team adapted the curriculum to incorporate team-based learning in the rural setting.
Materials and methods: Reading materials were distributed to learners prior to an in-person workshop at which time, learners reviewed a video and discussed PCMH materials to identify elements of the PCMH. Learners then engaged with parent mentors across three breakout sessions. A final group reflection was completed to review and discuss efforts providers would take to establish and maintain the PCMH in their own practice. Baseline and post-workshop PCMH perceptions and parent mentor reflections were collected and compared using t-test comparisons.
Results: Learner knowledge, perceptions, and comfort significantly increased after the workshop. Parent mentor comments also highlighted an increased understanding for the provider. Discussion: The adapted PCMH curriculum significantly impacted learner outcomes using a feasible approach that fit nicely within health professional curricula and limited resources of the rural setting. Parents enjoyed the opportunity to serve as mentors and valued the instruction format.
{"title":"A parent-led, patient-centered medical home model instruction for interprofessional undergraduate and graduate learning opportunities.","authors":"Lori Heginbotham, Gina Baugh, Timothy Lefeber, Linda Friehling, Christy Barnhart, Lee Ann Miller, Lucas Moore, Lesley Cottrell","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2021.2012105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.2012105","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite national efforts to establish patient-centered medical homes (PCMH), 57.3% of children with special health care needs are receiving care that does not meet medical home criteria. Project DOCC, a national curriculum designed by parents of children with disabilities or chronic disease, has shown documented strengths in medical resident learner education of children with special health care needs from the parent perspectives for over a decade. Because of the importance of PCMH and the need to provide compassionate care, our team adapted the curriculum to incorporate team-based learning in the rural setting.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Reading materials were distributed to learners prior to an in-person workshop at which time, learners reviewed a video and discussed PCMH materials to identify elements of the PCMH. Learners then engaged with parent mentors across three breakout sessions. A final group reflection was completed to review and discuss efforts providers would take to establish and maintain the PCMH in their own practice. Baseline and post-workshop PCMH perceptions and parent mentor reflections were collected and compared using t-test comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Learner knowledge, perceptions, and comfort significantly increased after the workshop. Parent mentor comments also highlighted an increased understanding for the provider. <b>Discussion:</b> The adapted PCMH curriculum significantly impacted learner outcomes using a feasible approach that fit nicely within health professional curricula and limited resources of the rural setting. Parents enjoyed the opportunity to serve as mentors and valued the instruction format.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8725748/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39734497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2021.2010513
Heather J Kagan, Margot Kelly-Hedrick, Elizabeth Benskin, Suzy Wolffe, Melissa Suchanek, Margaret S Chisolm
Introduction: The role of the visual arts in medical education has been understudied, especially with regard to program evaluation and learner assessment of complex competencies such as professional identity, team building, and tolerance for ambiguity. We designed a study to explore how an integrative art museum-based program might benefit 3rd and 4th year medical students.
Methods: We piloted 6 sessions with 18 participants. Evaluation methods included post-session surveys and semi-structured focus groups, which we qualitatively analyzed using an open-coding method.
Results: Seven themes emerged from the analysis related to the overarching realms of 'form' and 'function.' 'Form' themes included structural elements of the sessions that enabled engagement: (1) group format, (2) methods (e.g., discussion prompts, activities), (3) setting (e.g., physical space of the museum, temporal space), and (4) objects (e.g., paintings, sculptures). 'Function' themes included the personal and professional value and meaning derived from the sessions: (1) appreciation of others, (2) critical skills, and (3) personal inquiry.
Discussion: Our results expand what is known about the role of the visual arts in medical education by suggesting that the visual arts may facilitate clinically relevant learning across a range of competencies via specific formal aspects (group format, method, setting, objects) of art museum-based pedagogical methods.
{"title":"Understanding the role of the art museum in teaching clinical-level medical students.","authors":"Heather J Kagan, Margot Kelly-Hedrick, Elizabeth Benskin, Suzy Wolffe, Melissa Suchanek, Margaret S Chisolm","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2021.2010513","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.2010513","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The role of the visual arts in medical education has been understudied, especially with regard to program evaluation and learner assessment of complex competencies such as professional identity, team building, and tolerance for ambiguity. We designed a study to explore how an integrative art museum-based program might benefit 3rd and 4th year medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We piloted 6 sessions with 18 participants. Evaluation methods included post-session surveys and semi-structured focus groups, which we qualitatively analyzed using an open-coding method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven themes emerged from the analysis related to the overarching realms of 'form' and 'function.' 'Form' themes included structural elements of the sessions that enabled engagement: (1) group format, (2) methods (e.g., discussion prompts, activities), (3) setting (e.g., physical space of the museum, temporal space), and (4) objects (e.g., paintings, sculptures). 'Function' themes included the personal and professional value and meaning derived from the sessions: (1) appreciation of others, (2) critical skills, and (3) personal inquiry.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our results expand what is known about the role of the visual arts in medical education by suggesting that the visual arts may facilitate clinically relevant learning across a range of competencies via specific formal aspects (group format, method, setting, objects) of art museum-based pedagogical methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8648011/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39806334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2122106
Arvind Suresh, Nakia M Wighton, Tanya E Sorensen, Thomas C Palladino, Roshini C Pinto-Powell
Medical students engage with medically underserved communities (MUC) and vulnerable populations but often lack preparation to advocate appropriately for these communities. While preclinical programs with an experiential community component effectively increase knowledge about serving MUC, the pandemic limited clinical opportunities in community settings for learners. We examined the impact of a streamlined, hybrid service learning curriculum on first-year medical student attitudes towards MUC and their readiness and interest in addressing health barriers faced by this population. The redesigned curriculum for the student-led program required participants to attend nine virtual seminars led by faculty and community members with expertise serving MUC. Students partnered with one of three community agencies to organize service projects and gain exposure to the life experiences of MUC using virtual and in-person approaches. Of the fifteen first year medical students who participated in the program, positive attitudes were sustained across all scales using the Medical Student Attitudes Toward the Underserved (MSATU) questionnaire after one year. A majority (≥50%) of students reported a large increase in their knowledge of the health challenges faced by underserved populations after each didactic session. Despite the mostly virtual nature of community partnerships, students reported increased confidence in their ability to direct MUC patients to local resources (p < 0.01). The program also had a positive impact on student interest in working with medically underserved patients in the future, with 71% of participants indicating a significant impact on their interest in working in a medically underserved area. Our redesigned elective curriculum provided participants with foundational knowledge to advocate appropriately for underserved populations and demonstrated the efficacy of virtual approaches for community service and service learning. Our findings suggest hybrid and virtual experiential learning opportunities are a viable and non-inferior curricular approach to teaching health equity and community health.
{"title":"A hybrid educational approach to service learning: impact on student attitudes and readiness in working with medically underserved communities.","authors":"Arvind Suresh, Nakia M Wighton, Tanya E Sorensen, Thomas C Palladino, Roshini C Pinto-Powell","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2022.2122106","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2122106","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical students engage with medically underserved communities (MUC) and vulnerable populations but often lack preparation to advocate appropriately for these communities. While preclinical programs with an experiential community component effectively increase knowledge about serving MUC, the pandemic limited clinical opportunities in community settings for learners. We examined the impact of a streamlined, hybrid service learning curriculum on first-year medical student attitudes towards MUC and their readiness and interest in addressing health barriers faced by this population. The redesigned curriculum for the student-led program required participants to attend nine virtual seminars led by faculty and community members with expertise serving MUC. Students partnered with one of three community agencies to organize service projects and gain exposure to the life experiences of MUC using virtual and in-person approaches. Of the fifteen first year medical students who participated in the program, positive attitudes were sustained across all scales using the Medical Student Attitudes Toward the Underserved (MSATU) questionnaire after one year. A majority (≥50%) of students reported a large increase in their knowledge of the health challenges faced by underserved populations after each didactic session. Despite the mostly virtual nature of community partnerships, students reported increased confidence in their ability to direct MUC patients to local resources (p < 0.01). The program also had a positive impact on student interest in working with medically underserved patients in the future, with 71% of participants indicating a significant impact on their interest in working in a medically underserved area. Our redesigned elective curriculum provided participants with foundational knowledge to advocate appropriately for underserved populations and demonstrated the efficacy of virtual approaches for community service and service learning. Our findings suggest hybrid and virtual experiential learning opportunities are a viable and non-inferior curricular approach to teaching health equity and community health.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518252/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40369323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2094529
Julia F Aquino, Robert R Riss, Sara M Multerer, Leora N Mogilner, Teri L Turner
As collaborative work in medical education has increasingly moved online, team mentors have had to adapt their practices into the virtual environment. Fostering connection, communication and productivity on virtual teams requires specific skills and deliberate practice that differ from in-person teamwork. Drawing from best practices in business, education and medicine and also from our own experience as a virtual team, we present a guide for mentors to create and sustain successful virtual teams. Grounded in Tuckman's Five Stage Model of Team Development, we offer specific strategies for virtual team mentors to promote team cohesion, mitigate conflict, maintain productivity and leverage the benefits of the virtual environment.
{"title":"A step-by-step guide for mentors to facilitate team building and communication in virtual teams.","authors":"Julia F Aquino, Robert R Riss, Sara M Multerer, Leora N Mogilner, Teri L Turner","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2022.2094529","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2094529","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As collaborative work in medical education has increasingly moved online, team mentors have had to adapt their practices into the virtual environment. Fostering connection, communication and productivity on virtual teams requires specific skills and deliberate practice that differ from in-person teamwork. Drawing from best practices in business, education and medicine and also from our own experience as a virtual team, we present a guide for mentors to create and sustain successful virtual teams. Grounded in Tuckman's Five Stage Model of Team Development, we offer specific strategies for virtual team mentors to promote team cohesion, mitigate conflict, maintain productivity and leverage the benefits of the virtual environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9248936/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40406138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2098548
Rupinder Hayer, Kate Kirley, Stavros Tsipas, Jon Allen, Darlene Hanson, Eric Johnson
Blood pressure (BP) measurement is the most commonly performed procedure in clinical practice and requires mastering several skills. A prior study determined that medical school students failed to perform more than half of BP measurement skills correctly, demonstrating a need to redesign how BP measurement is taught. The American Medical Association set out to create and test a solution to address this BP measurement curricula gap. An eLearning series consisting of three modules was developed. The series was informed by evidence-based guidelines, includes content on self-measured blood pressure, is accessible to students at any time within their education journey, is interactive, and available to all healthcare schools at no cost. Prior to launch, a small pilot study was conducted with medical and nursing students to determine if these new eLearning modules address current gaps in BP measurement curricula. Students were instructed to complete an online assessment before and after viewing the main module within the series. Our results suggest that eLearning modules on BP measurement can help improve knowledge and ability to identify correct BP measurement skills. Pronounced improvements were observed in the topics of patient preparation, positioning, and cuff sizing and placement. Revisions were made to content areas where improvement was minimal. Overall, the findings revealed the importance of pilot testing a product prior to launch and while many skills may improve with an eLearning intervention, certain skills will still likely require additional in-person training with peers.
{"title":"Redesigning blood pressure measurement training in healthcare schools.","authors":"Rupinder Hayer, Kate Kirley, Stavros Tsipas, Jon Allen, Darlene Hanson, Eric Johnson","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2022.2098548","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2098548","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Blood pressure (BP) measurement is the most commonly performed procedure in clinical practice and requires mastering several skills. A prior study determined that medical school students failed to perform more than half of BP measurement skills correctly, demonstrating a need to redesign how BP measurement is taught. The American Medical Association set out to create and test a solution to address this BP measurement curricula gap. An eLearning series consisting of three modules was developed. The series was informed by evidence-based guidelines, includes content on self-measured blood pressure, is accessible to students at any time within their education journey, is interactive, and available to all healthcare schools at no cost. Prior to launch, a small pilot study was conducted with medical and nursing students to determine if these new eLearning modules address current gaps in BP measurement curricula. Students were instructed to complete an online assessment before and after viewing the main module within the series. Our results suggest that eLearning modules on BP measurement can help improve knowledge and ability to identify correct BP measurement skills. Pronounced improvements were observed in the topics of patient preparation, positioning, and cuff sizing and placement. Revisions were made to content areas where improvement was minimal. Overall, the findings revealed the importance of pilot testing a product prior to launch and while many skills may improve with an eLearning intervention, certain skills will still likely require additional in-person training with peers.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/74/c9/ZMEO_27_2098548.PMC9272934.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40577833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2090308
Stephanie A Gill, Rocio B Quinonez, Mark Deutchman, Charles E Conklin, Denise Rizzolo, David Rabago, Paul Haidet, Hugh Silk
Oral health is essential to human health. Conditions associated with poor oral health involve all organ systems and many major disease categories including infectious disease, cardiovascular disease, chronic pain, cancer, and mental health. Outcomes are also associated with health equity. Medical education organizations including the Association of American Medical Colleges and National Academy of Medicine recommend that oral health be part of medical education. However, oral health is not traditionally included in many medical school, physician assistant, or nurse practitioner curricula. Several challenges explain this exclusion including lack of time, expertise, and prioritization; we therefore provide suggestions for integrating oral health education into the health professions school curriculum. These recommendations offer guidance for enhancing the oral health curriculum across institutions. We include key organizational and foundational steps, strategies to link oral health with existing content, and approaches to achieve curricular sustainability.
{"title":"Integrating Oral Health into Health Professions School Curricula.","authors":"Stephanie A Gill, Rocio B Quinonez, Mark Deutchman, Charles E Conklin, Denise Rizzolo, David Rabago, Paul Haidet, Hugh Silk","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2022.2090308","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2090308","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oral health is essential to human health. Conditions associated with poor oral health involve all organ systems and many major disease categories including infectious disease, cardiovascular disease, chronic pain, cancer, and mental health. Outcomes are also associated with health equity. Medical education organizations including the Association of American Medical Colleges and National Academy of Medicine recommend that oral health be part of medical education. However, oral health is not traditionally included in many medical school, physician assistant, or nurse practitioner curricula. Several challenges explain this exclusion including lack of time, expertise, and prioritization; we therefore provide suggestions for integrating oral health education into the health professions school curriculum. These recommendations offer guidance for enhancing the oral health curriculum across institutions. We include key organizational and foundational steps, strategies to link oral health with existing content, and approaches to achieve curricular sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245988/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40210636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}