This paper looks at a case of rural-to-rural movement of agrarian capital in southern India and the ways in which capital–labour relations are reworked to maintain oppressive forms of exploitation. Faced with an agrarian crisis, capitalist farmers from affluent communities of Wayanad, Kerala, take large tracts of land for lease in the neighbouring state of Karnataka and grow ginger based on price speculation. Landless Adivasis from Wayanad have served as labourers on these ginger farmlands for the past three decades. Recently, farmers have shifted to employing labourers from a Scheduled Caste (SC) from Karnataka. The change happened not just because of the lower wages the SC labourers were willing to work for but also because of the farmers' inclination to move away from Adivasis who have been resisting the poor working conditions on the farm. The story resonates with the broader dynamics of agrarian–labour relations amidst capitalist expansion and highlights the centrality of socio-political factors at play.
{"title":"Adivasi migrant labour and agrarian capitalism in southern India","authors":"R.C. Sudheesh","doi":"10.1111/joac.12540","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joac.12540","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper looks at a case of rural-to-rural movement of agrarian capital in southern India and the ways in which capital–labour relations are reworked to maintain oppressive forms of exploitation. Faced with an agrarian crisis, capitalist farmers from affluent communities of Wayanad, Kerala, take large tracts of land for lease in the neighbouring state of Karnataka and grow ginger based on price speculation. Landless Adivasis from Wayanad have served as labourers on these ginger farmlands for the past three decades. Recently, farmers have shifted to employing labourers from a Scheduled Caste (SC) from Karnataka. The change happened not just because of the lower wages the SC labourers were willing to work for but also because of the farmers' inclination to move away from Adivasis who have been resisting the poor working conditions on the farm. The story resonates with the broader dynamics of agrarian–labour relations amidst capitalist expansion and highlights the centrality of socio-political factors at play.</p>","PeriodicalId":47678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agrarian Change","volume":"23 4","pages":"755-770"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joac.12540","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41341949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
COVID-19 has had deep impacts on a wide range of vulnerable communities in Canada. Migrant agricultural workers in the southwestern region of Ontario were particularly impacted. Fearing the threat of the ‘racialized foreign other’, the Canadian state produced myriad securitization responses with heightened surveillance. This paper will examine both state and non-state forms of securitization and the response from both workers and activists such as the advocacy group Justicia for Migrant Workers (J4MW). While there has been ample discussion of how vulnerable migrant agricultural workers were affected during the pandemic, there has been less attention paid to how state policies have heightened and targeted specific groups such as migrant agricultural workers through modes of securitization. Central to this was to ensure that labour needs would be met to ensure the viability of Canada's multi-billion agricultural industry. This paper shows how securitization and control were vital to ensure no disruptions to production levels and Canada's role as a leading agricultural export producer.
COVID - 19对加拿大广泛的弱势社区产生了深远的影响。安大略省西南部地区的农业移民工人受到的影响尤其严重。由于担心“种族化的外国他者”的威胁,加拿大政府采取了大量的证券化措施,加强了监控。本文将研究国家和非国家形式的证券化,以及工人和活动家(如倡导组织“为移民工人伸张正义”(J4MW))的反应。虽然人们对脆弱的农业移徙工人在疫情期间受到的影响进行了充分的讨论,但对国家政策如何通过证券化模式加强和针对农业移徙工人等特定群体的关注较少。其核心是确保劳动力需求得到满足,以确保加拿大数十亿美元的农业产业的生存能力。本文展示了如何证券化和控制是至关重要的,以确保不中断生产水平和加拿大作为一个领先的农业出口生产国的作用。《Journal of Agrarian Change》版权归Wiley-Blackwell所有,未经版权所有者明确书面许可,其内容不得复制或通过电子邮件发送到多个网站或发布到listserv。但是,用户可以打印、下载或通过电子邮件发送文章供个人使用。这可以删节。对副本的准确性不作任何保证。用户应参阅原始出版版本的材料的完整。(版权适用于所有人。)
{"title":"Discipline and resistance in southwestern Ontario: Securitization of migrant workers and their acts of defiance","authors":"Chris Ramsaroop","doi":"10.1111/joac.12541","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joac.12541","url":null,"abstract":"<p>COVID-19 has had deep impacts on a wide range of vulnerable communities in Canada. Migrant agricultural workers in the southwestern region of Ontario were particularly impacted. Fearing the threat of the ‘racialized foreign other’, the Canadian state produced myriad securitization responses with heightened surveillance. This paper will examine both state and non-state forms of securitization and the response from both workers and activists such as the advocacy group Justicia for Migrant Workers (J4MW). While there has been ample discussion of how vulnerable migrant agricultural workers were affected during the pandemic, there has been less attention paid to how state policies have heightened and targeted specific groups such as migrant agricultural workers through modes of securitization. Central to this was to ensure that labour needs would be met to ensure the viability of Canada's multi-billion agricultural industry. This paper shows how securitization and control were vital to ensure no disruptions to production levels and Canada's role as a leading agricultural export producer.</p>","PeriodicalId":47678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agrarian Change","volume":"23 3","pages":"600-610"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joac.12541","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48512048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Dark clouds of violence gather over the heads of the villagers in the Sahel. Insurgencies and banditry, motivated by a volatile mixture of well-founded distrust in government, misgivings about urban wealth capture and bitterness about decades of abandonment, terrorize the countryside. Laced with religious sentiments, oratory and decor, armed groups seem to develop ethnic, racial and geopolitical unrest. And when French, and other UN troops, struggle with Russian Wagner mercenaries to court the pleasure of the Malian government and to impose peace, chances are that something completely different is in store. Optimism seems foolhardy.</p><p>Yet, if we refuse to see the rural Sahelian population as mere human husks doomed to fade out of history as its predestined losers, we might see resilience, endurance and ingenuity. Against the odds, mind you. Camilla Toulmin's <i>Land, Investment and Migration</i> is about continuity and change in rural Sahel. Forty-some years have passed since Toulmin's first visit to the village of Dlonguébougou in central Mali in 1980, representing more than a generation, more than 2/3 of Mali's post-independence history. We often rely on memory to compare the present with the past. But memories are not of the past, they are assemblages made in the present with the structure of a flea market and the credibility of a compleat angler. In contrast, Toulmin's comparison of the presence with the past does not rely on memory alone. Her book revisits the place and research that formed the basis of her first book, <i>Cattle, Women and Wells: Managing Household Survival in the Sahel</i>, from 1992. With the historical documentation in hand, the new book is on firm ground to describe and explains the modest fortunes and more ample adversities that have been visited upon the villagers over the past four decades. Increasing pressure on land and looming insecurity has changed the conditions for all.</p><p>Toulmin's approach is holistic. She engages the system of production in the Sahel and the social and political relations that are spun around classes of people, their interests, visions and actions. The analysis takes its point of departure in the farming system under the difficulties of climate change. Toulmin shows how farming integrates agroforestry and how wild trees are not as wild and unfarmed as an untrained observer would suspect. The landscape was always frugal, and the chapters show how different ‘famine foods’ create a necessary buffer for survival. The farming system itself is also quite intricate. By zooming in on different varieties of crops, the book makes a case for constant micro-adaptation which is only possible for people who know their environment well. The big question is whether the potential of the adaptive strategies will be exhausted in the face of climate change. The jury is still out on this one.</p><p>Another relentless pressure comes from land scarcity. Whereas land had seemed endlessly abundant when the
{"title":"Land, investment and migration. By Camilla Toulmin, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2020. pp. xxv + 241. £67.00 (hbk). ISBN 9780198852766","authors":"Christian Lund","doi":"10.1111/joac.12544","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joac.12544","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dark clouds of violence gather over the heads of the villagers in the Sahel. Insurgencies and banditry, motivated by a volatile mixture of well-founded distrust in government, misgivings about urban wealth capture and bitterness about decades of abandonment, terrorize the countryside. Laced with religious sentiments, oratory and decor, armed groups seem to develop ethnic, racial and geopolitical unrest. And when French, and other UN troops, struggle with Russian Wagner mercenaries to court the pleasure of the Malian government and to impose peace, chances are that something completely different is in store. Optimism seems foolhardy.</p><p>Yet, if we refuse to see the rural Sahelian population as mere human husks doomed to fade out of history as its predestined losers, we might see resilience, endurance and ingenuity. Against the odds, mind you. Camilla Toulmin's <i>Land, Investment and Migration</i> is about continuity and change in rural Sahel. Forty-some years have passed since Toulmin's first visit to the village of Dlonguébougou in central Mali in 1980, representing more than a generation, more than 2/3 of Mali's post-independence history. We often rely on memory to compare the present with the past. But memories are not of the past, they are assemblages made in the present with the structure of a flea market and the credibility of a compleat angler. In contrast, Toulmin's comparison of the presence with the past does not rely on memory alone. Her book revisits the place and research that formed the basis of her first book, <i>Cattle, Women and Wells: Managing Household Survival in the Sahel</i>, from 1992. With the historical documentation in hand, the new book is on firm ground to describe and explains the modest fortunes and more ample adversities that have been visited upon the villagers over the past four decades. Increasing pressure on land and looming insecurity has changed the conditions for all.</p><p>Toulmin's approach is holistic. She engages the system of production in the Sahel and the social and political relations that are spun around classes of people, their interests, visions and actions. The analysis takes its point of departure in the farming system under the difficulties of climate change. Toulmin shows how farming integrates agroforestry and how wild trees are not as wild and unfarmed as an untrained observer would suspect. The landscape was always frugal, and the chapters show how different ‘famine foods’ create a necessary buffer for survival. The farming system itself is also quite intricate. By zooming in on different varieties of crops, the book makes a case for constant micro-adaptation which is only possible for people who know their environment well. The big question is whether the potential of the adaptive strategies will be exhausted in the face of climate change. The jury is still out on this one.</p><p>Another relentless pressure comes from land scarcity. Whereas land had seemed endlessly abundant when the ","PeriodicalId":47678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agrarian Change","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joac.12544","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47142299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Under what conditions are some small-scale agricultural producers able to overcome challenges associated with shifting to organic production, whereas most are not? The answers are vital for the global effort to encourage more sustainable, pro-poor forms of agriculture—more organic farming, more sustainable production; more smallholders engaged in green production, more income and better livelihoods. Yet, answering this question is challenging in part because previous analyses of global production networks, such as those associated with organic agriculture, focus more on broad governance patterns than the specific factors and actors that help smallholders shift to organic production and link to far-flung markets. To fill in these gaps, we conducted fieldwork in Isan, Thailand, a major rice-producing area in which many groups of smallholders have attempted to shift into organic production. Doing so allows us to identify the critical challenges associated with upgrading into organic production and analyse how specific actors enabled some groups to overcome these challenges. Our findings provide a generalizable theoretical approach to understanding how to link small-scale farmers to global value chains in ways that can potentially enhance smallholders' livelihoods, spark rural development and encourage more sustainable practices in agriculture.
{"title":"Going green in Thailand: Upgrading in global organic value chains","authors":"Joel D. Moore, John A. Donaldson","doi":"10.1111/joac.12543","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joac.12543","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Under what conditions are some small-scale agricultural producers able to overcome challenges associated with shifting to organic production, whereas most are not? The answers are vital for the global effort to encourage more sustainable, pro-poor forms of agriculture—more organic farming, more sustainable production; more smallholders engaged in green production, more income and better livelihoods. Yet, answering this question is challenging in part because previous analyses of global production networks, such as those associated with organic agriculture, focus more on broad governance patterns than the specific factors and actors that help smallholders shift to organic production and link to far-flung markets. To fill in these gaps, we conducted fieldwork in Isan, Thailand, a major rice-producing area in which many groups of smallholders have attempted to shift into organic production. Doing so allows us to identify the critical challenges associated with upgrading into organic production and analyse how specific actors enabled some groups to overcome these challenges. Our findings provide a generalizable theoretical approach to understanding how to link small-scale farmers to global value chains in ways that can potentially enhance smallholders' livelihoods, spark rural development and encourage more sustainable practices in agriculture.</p>","PeriodicalId":47678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agrarian Change","volume":"23 4","pages":"844-867"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joac.12543","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49611620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Based on an empirical exercise carried out in five villages of Odisha in eastern India, the paper looks into ageing of the farm population and the experiences and responses of farmers of various age groups to farming. The findings of the study indicate that agriculture is greying, farmers are getting older and the youth, particularly of higher and cultivating castes, are averse to farming. The unwillingness of these youths to join farming is mainly attributed to loss of social status, declining profitability in agriculture and discouragement of immediate ‘mentors’, the middle-aged farmers, caused by the perpetual decline of farm income and loss of social recognition. The hitherto nonfarming youths, belonging to scheduled castes, scheduled tribes and service-rendering castes, especially the female youths, are joining farming to fill this gap, mostly as leased-in cultivators.
{"title":"‘For them farming may be the last resort, but for us it is a new hope’: Ageing, youth and farming in India","authors":"B. B. Mohanty, Papesh K. Lenka","doi":"10.1111/joac.12538","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joac.12538","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Based on an empirical exercise carried out in five villages of Odisha in eastern India, the paper looks into ageing of the farm population and the experiences and responses of farmers of various age groups to farming. The findings of the study indicate that agriculture is greying, farmers are getting older and the youth, particularly of higher and cultivating castes, are averse to farming. The unwillingness of these youths to join farming is mainly attributed to loss of social status, declining profitability in agriculture and discouragement of immediate ‘mentors’, the middle-aged farmers, caused by the perpetual decline of farm income and loss of social recognition. The hitherto nonfarming youths, belonging to scheduled castes, scheduled tribes and service-rendering castes, especially the female youths, are joining farming to fill this gap, mostly as leased-in cultivators.</p>","PeriodicalId":47678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agrarian Change","volume":"23 4","pages":"771-791"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joac.12538","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46338708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
How does the COVID-19 pandemic impact migrant worker visibility? This paper examines how the pandemic underscores the invisibility of Zimbabwean migrant farm workers employed at ZZ2, one of the largest commercial farms in South Africa. I argue that Zimbabweans are made invisible in three ways. First, employer and state restrictions on mobility, alongside rising xenophobia in South Africa, leave migrant workers hyper-visible to ZZ2 management, yet invisible to most people outside the farm. Second, ZZ2 avoids discussion of its migrant workforce in public forums, even as it faces increased scrutiny for its treatment of its workers during the pandemic. Third, the most prominent critic of ZZ2—the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF)—grants migrant workers only a partial visibility as undifferentiated foreigners with no voice, a construction that ultimately maintains their invisibility at the company. Taken together, these interlocking forms of invisibilization diminish the structural and associational power of workers.
{"title":"Amplifying invisibility: COVID-19 and Zimbabwean migrant farm workers in South Africa","authors":"Lincoln Addison","doi":"10.1111/joac.12542","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joac.12542","url":null,"abstract":"<p>How does the COVID-19 pandemic impact migrant worker visibility? This paper examines how the pandemic underscores the invisibility of Zimbabwean migrant farm workers employed at ZZ2, one of the largest commercial farms in South Africa. I argue that Zimbabweans are made invisible in three ways. First, employer and state restrictions on mobility, alongside rising xenophobia in South Africa, leave migrant workers hyper-visible to ZZ2 management, yet invisible to most people outside the farm. Second, ZZ2 avoids discussion of its migrant workforce in public forums, even as it faces increased scrutiny for its treatment of its workers during the pandemic. Third, the most prominent critic of ZZ2—the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF)—grants migrant workers only a partial visibility as undifferentiated foreigners with no voice, a construction that ultimately maintains their invisibility at the company. Taken together, these interlocking forms of invisibilization diminish the structural and associational power of workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":47678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agrarian Change","volume":"23 3","pages":"590-599"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42922272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Over the last several years—in the context of US political upheaval, ongoing crises related to climate change, the COVID-19 pandemic and an economic downturn—indigenous, Mexican-origin farmworker families in Washington State have engaged more intensely in class struggle through acts of solidarity and forms of collective action, in part through independent labour unions, worker cooperatives and mutual aid. This article chronicles the labour struggles that led to a notion of class rooted in family units of production and that strengthened transnational solidarity in resistance to racist forms of exploitation in the agricultural sector. Class organization rooted in family and solidarity has allowed indigenous agricultural workers in Washington State to face COVID-19 and incidents driven by climate change, which syndemically compounded existing community health crises, from a place of power. Focusing on the experience of farmworker families in Washington State, I outline agricultural employers' exploitation of workers during this period of increased vulnerability and the strength of farmworkers' resolve to take their health and well-being into their own hands.
{"title":"COVID-19 and the power of indigenous, Mexican-origin farmworker families in the US Pacific Northwest","authors":"Tomás Alberto Madrigal","doi":"10.1111/joac.12539","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joac.12539","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the last several years—in the context of US political upheaval, ongoing crises related to climate change, the COVID-19 pandemic and an economic downturn—indigenous, Mexican-origin farmworker families in Washington State have engaged more intensely in class struggle through acts of solidarity and forms of collective action, in part through independent labour unions, worker cooperatives and mutual aid. This article chronicles the labour struggles that led to a notion of class rooted in family units of production and that strengthened transnational solidarity in resistance to racist forms of exploitation in the agricultural sector. Class organization rooted in family and solidarity has allowed indigenous agricultural workers in Washington State to face COVID-19 and incidents driven by climate change, which syndemically compounded existing community health crises, from a place of power. Focusing on the experience of farmworker families in Washington State, I outline agricultural employers' exploitation of workers during this period of increased vulnerability and the strength of farmworkers' resolve to take their health and well-being into their own hands.</p>","PeriodicalId":47678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agrarian Change","volume":"23 3","pages":"622-633"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43502603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>What does it mean to live a rural life in Morocco? How do farmers participate in rural politics? How does the transformation of peasant farming inform us about rural life's social and political organization? These central questions guide Karen E. Rignall's book <i>An Elusive Common: Land, Politics, and the Agrarian Rurality in a Moroccan Oasis</i>. At the heart of the argument, Rignall shows how rural dwellers invented <i>new rurality</i> (p. 5) to adjust to the new reality (global circuits of capital and labour) facing rural life. Within this, land and farming became the object of their struggle. <i>An Elusive Common</i> invites the reader to examine southeast Morocco's agrarian political and social transformation over the last century. Furthermore, Rignall attempts to look at the ways in which the integration of southeast Morocco into global circuits of capital, the impact of colonialism on the political landscape, and labour out-migration disorganized the racialized system of farming and sharecropping.</p><p>Impressively, the book relies upon 1 year of fieldwork from December 2009 until December 2010 in three villages in the Mgoun Valley in southeast Morocco (viz. El Harte, Rbat and Imzline, and El Bour n'Ait Yayha) and uses qualitative and quantitative methods. The quantitative approach consisted of a survey of 306 households in 2014. At the same time, the qualitative method involves a rich ethnography of land, labour, and community in the field sites, including testimonies of southeast Morocco's oasis inhabitants and the organization of their rural community. This combination of qualitative and quantitative methods has enriched the book's argument.</p><p>The first chapter aims to set the scene of Morocco's customary law and land tenure in Rignall's three main fieldwork sites: El Harte, Rbat and Imzline, and El Bour n'Ait Yayha. These three sites show how inhabitants use customary law in their struggles. The first part of chapter one provides an overview of customary governance and its relationship to the legal regime in which the jma'a (community) and individuals own the land. Rignall demonstrates how colonial authority designed bureaucratic and legal opacity regarding the governance of land tenure and collective land, which the post-colonial states inherited. These legal ambiguities, Rignall argues, were used by the three communities to make their claims over land. At the same time, the author makes a claim against the romanticization of customs and the community by showing how labour migration to Europe at the beginning of the 1960s produced a new social and economic landscape. Indeed, through remittances, sharecroppers were able to transition to landowners and develop commercial agriculture. Thus, capital accumulation, in this case, allowed marginalized inhabitants of southeast Morocco to gain upward mobility and “secure their autonomy” (p. 76).</p><p>The Mgoun Valley is not limited to its fields of roses. Indeed, at the edge of the re
{"title":"An Elusive Common: Land, Politics, and Agrarian Rurality in a Moroccan Oasis By Karen E. Rignall, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 2021. pp. 264. 125$ (hb). ISBN: 9781501756122","authors":"Fayrouz Yousfi","doi":"10.1111/joac.12537","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joac.12537","url":null,"abstract":"<p>What does it mean to live a rural life in Morocco? How do farmers participate in rural politics? How does the transformation of peasant farming inform us about rural life's social and political organization? These central questions guide Karen E. Rignall's book <i>An Elusive Common: Land, Politics, and the Agrarian Rurality in a Moroccan Oasis</i>. At the heart of the argument, Rignall shows how rural dwellers invented <i>new rurality</i> (p. 5) to adjust to the new reality (global circuits of capital and labour) facing rural life. Within this, land and farming became the object of their struggle. <i>An Elusive Common</i> invites the reader to examine southeast Morocco's agrarian political and social transformation over the last century. Furthermore, Rignall attempts to look at the ways in which the integration of southeast Morocco into global circuits of capital, the impact of colonialism on the political landscape, and labour out-migration disorganized the racialized system of farming and sharecropping.</p><p>Impressively, the book relies upon 1 year of fieldwork from December 2009 until December 2010 in three villages in the Mgoun Valley in southeast Morocco (viz. El Harte, Rbat and Imzline, and El Bour n'Ait Yayha) and uses qualitative and quantitative methods. The quantitative approach consisted of a survey of 306 households in 2014. At the same time, the qualitative method involves a rich ethnography of land, labour, and community in the field sites, including testimonies of southeast Morocco's oasis inhabitants and the organization of their rural community. This combination of qualitative and quantitative methods has enriched the book's argument.</p><p>The first chapter aims to set the scene of Morocco's customary law and land tenure in Rignall's three main fieldwork sites: El Harte, Rbat and Imzline, and El Bour n'Ait Yayha. These three sites show how inhabitants use customary law in their struggles. The first part of chapter one provides an overview of customary governance and its relationship to the legal regime in which the jma'a (community) and individuals own the land. Rignall demonstrates how colonial authority designed bureaucratic and legal opacity regarding the governance of land tenure and collective land, which the post-colonial states inherited. These legal ambiguities, Rignall argues, were used by the three communities to make their claims over land. At the same time, the author makes a claim against the romanticization of customs and the community by showing how labour migration to Europe at the beginning of the 1960s produced a new social and economic landscape. Indeed, through remittances, sharecroppers were able to transition to landowners and develop commercial agriculture. Thus, capital accumulation, in this case, allowed marginalized inhabitants of southeast Morocco to gain upward mobility and “secure their autonomy” (p. 76).</p><p>The Mgoun Valley is not limited to its fields of roses. Indeed, at the edge of the re","PeriodicalId":47678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agrarian Change","volume":"23 4","pages":"905-908"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joac.12537","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44098379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Neomercantilism is commonly portrayed as a central mechanism of China's global agribusiness engagement. It implies reordering the international food regime by moving away from financial and trade liberalization and securing stable import supplies and price controls under state support. However, this article raises an alternative interpretation through an empirical-rich investigation of the prominence of the state-owned China Oil and Foodstuffs Corporation (COFCO) in the soybean commodity chain. The article draws upon analyses of the Chinese state and international food regime to demonstrate that recent changes in state-capital relations during the Xi Jinping administration propelled forms of capital accumulation based on financial speculation and shareholder values. I conclude that state-driven internationalization has placed Chinese agribusiness in an advantageous position within global finance rather than challenging it through agrarian neomercantilist strategies.
{"title":"China's financialized soybeans: The fault lines of neomercantilism narratives in international food regime analyses","authors":"Tomaz Mefano Fares","doi":"10.1111/joac.12536","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joac.12536","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Neomercantilism is commonly portrayed as a central mechanism of China's global agribusiness engagement. It implies reordering the international food regime by moving away from financial and trade liberalization and securing stable import supplies and price controls under state support. However, this article raises an alternative interpretation through an empirical-rich investigation of the prominence of the state-owned China Oil and Foodstuffs Corporation (COFCO) in the soybean commodity chain. The article draws upon analyses of the Chinese state and international food regime to demonstrate that recent changes in state-capital relations during the Xi Jinping administration propelled forms of capital accumulation based on financial speculation and shareholder values. I conclude that state-driven internationalization has placed Chinese agribusiness in an advantageous position within global finance rather than challenging it through agrarian neomercantilist strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agrarian Change","volume":"23 3","pages":"477-499"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joac.12536","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46663213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In recent decades, rural livelihood has been restructured dramatically in the Global South as a result of neoliberal transformations such as the removal of state subsidies for small-scale farmers, privatization of agricultural state economic enterprises, rising control of global agribusiness firms on agricultural production, expropriation of rural commons and private farmland for mega-investments in natural resources. Under the Justice and Development Party (AKP) governments, Turkey has been a prime example of these patterns of accumulation and dispossession. Additionally, the country has been facing coal rush policies of the AKP governments with the aim of utilizing domestic coal to overcome the problem of energy supply security. In this paper, I argue that rural change and patterns of proletarianization in the rural extractive regions are inherently gendered and women assume a central role in the production and social reproduction of the classes of extractive labour. Drawing on 3-year research conducted in the Soma Coal Basin, Western Anatolia, Turkey, the paper examines the transformation of women's (i) petty commodity production as unpaid family farmers, (ii) agricultural wage work and (iii) reproductive work as miners' wives and subsistence farmers as a result of rising private sector coal investments since the mid-2000s.
{"title":"The social reproduction of natural resource extraction and gendered labour regimes in rural Turkey","authors":"Coşku Çelik","doi":"10.1111/joac.12535","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joac.12535","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent decades, rural livelihood has been restructured dramatically in the Global South as a result of neoliberal transformations such as the removal of state subsidies for small-scale farmers, privatization of agricultural state economic enterprises, rising control of global agribusiness firms on agricultural production, expropriation of rural commons and private farmland for mega-investments in natural resources. Under the Justice and Development Party (AKP) governments, Turkey has been a prime example of these patterns of accumulation and dispossession. Additionally, the country has been facing coal rush policies of the AKP governments with the aim of utilizing domestic coal to overcome the problem of energy supply security. In this paper, I argue that rural change and patterns of proletarianization in the rural extractive regions are inherently gendered and women assume a central role in the production and social reproduction of the classes of extractive labour. Drawing on 3-year research conducted in the Soma Coal Basin, Western Anatolia, Turkey, the paper examines the transformation of women's (i) petty commodity production as unpaid family farmers, (ii) agricultural wage work and (iii) reproductive work as miners' wives and subsistence farmers as a result of rising private sector coal investments since the mid-2000s.</p>","PeriodicalId":47678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agrarian Change","volume":"24 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joac.12535","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48748247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}