首页 > 最新文献

Journal of English for Academic Purposes最新文献

英文 中文
IF 3.1 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-06-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101543
Tanzeela Anbreen
{"title":"","authors":"Tanzeela Anbreen","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101543","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101543","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101543"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144510905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Computer-mediated collaborative writing and individual scientific writing proficiency 计算机协同写作与个人科学写作能力
IF 3.1 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-06-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101542
Jamie Costley , Ksenia Adamovich , Galina Shulgina , Matthew Baldwin , Mik Fanguy
Collaborative writing is a common practice in EFL classrooms and widely considered a beneficial instructional approach. However, there is a lack of research investigating whether collaborative writing affects students' subsequent individual writing proficiency. The present study investigates the effects of online collaborative writing on the individual writing performance of postgraduate students (n = 591) enrolled in a scientific writing course at a large Korean university. Over 10 weeks, students worked in small groups (3–5) to collaboratively complete four sections of an academic manuscript, followed by related individual writing tasks. The results showed a significant positive correlation between the students' collaborative and individual writing performance on a given manuscript section. However, only students' group scores for the Results section demonstrated a positive relationship with students’ individual post-test scores, and no such results for other sections were found. Thus, the organisation of collaborative writing assignments within an academic writing course may prove beneficial for students, facilitating the production of manuscript sections of better quality on an individual basis. The study shows that group writing improves subsequent performance on similar writing tasks; however, the longer-term effects on differing pieces of writing may vary depending on activity type.
协作写作在英语课堂上很常见,被广泛认为是一种有益的教学方法。然而,关于合作写作是否会影响学生随后的个人写作水平的研究却很少。本研究调查了在线协作写作对韩国一所大型大学科学写作课程的研究生(n = 591)个人写作表现的影响。在10周的时间里,学生们分成3-5个小组,共同完成一篇学术论文的四个部分,然后是相关的个人写作任务。结果显示,在给定的稿件部分,学生的合作和个人写作表现之间存在显著的正相关。然而,只有结果部分的学生群体分数与学生个人测试后分数呈正相关,其他部分没有发现这样的结果。因此,在学术写作课程中组织合作写作作业可能对学生有益,促进了个人基础上更高质量的手稿部分的生产。研究表明,小组写作可以提高类似写作任务的后续表现;然而,对不同作品的长期影响可能因活动类型而异。
{"title":"Computer-mediated collaborative writing and individual scientific writing proficiency","authors":"Jamie Costley ,&nbsp;Ksenia Adamovich ,&nbsp;Galina Shulgina ,&nbsp;Matthew Baldwin ,&nbsp;Mik Fanguy","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101542","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101542","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Collaborative writing is a common practice in EFL classrooms and widely considered a beneficial instructional approach. However, there is a lack of research investigating whether collaborative writing affects students' subsequent individual writing proficiency. The present study investigates the effects of online collaborative writing on the individual writing performance of postgraduate students (n = 591) enrolled in a scientific writing course at a large Korean university. Over 10 weeks, students worked in small groups (3–5) to collaboratively complete four sections of an academic manuscript, followed by related individual writing tasks. The results showed a significant positive correlation between the students' collaborative and individual writing performance on a given manuscript section. However, only students' group scores for the Results section demonstrated a positive relationship with students’ individual post-test scores, and no such results for other sections were found. Thus, the organisation of collaborative writing assignments within an academic writing course may prove beneficial for students, facilitating the production of manuscript sections of better quality on an individual basis. The study shows that group writing improves subsequent performance on similar writing tasks; however, the longer-term effects on differing pieces of writing may vary depending on activity type.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101542"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144481066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Disciplinary variation of metadiscourse: A comparison of human-written and ChatGPT-generated English research article abstracts 元话语的学科变异:人工写作和chatgpt生成的英语研究论文摘要的比较
IF 3.1 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-06-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101540
Man Zhang , Jiawei Zhang
In order to identify more fundamental and subtler similarities and differences between human-written and ChatGPT-generated academic texts, and enhance the development and application of LLMs and understanding of human language, we use a self-built corpus and incorporate a bottom-up approach and statistical methods to compare metadiscourse variation across eight disciplines in human-written and ChatGPT-generated English research article abstracts. Results show that disciplinary variation of metadiscourse in human-written and ChatGPT-generated abstracts agrees in general but not in detail. Generally, in both types of abstracts, all disciplines use metadiscourse to fulfill three broad and eight specific discourse functions: Referring to text participants (Referring to writer, Referring to text), Describing text actions (Introducing, Arguing, Finding, Presenting), Describing text circumstances (Phoric marking, Code glossing), among which Referring to text participants and Introducing are prominent. Besides, disciplines in both types of abstracts exhibit the hard-soft discipline division in both frequencies and discourse functions, with metadiscourse markers and major discourse functions more prevalent in soft disciplines. Specifically, compared to disciplines of human-written abstracts, those of ChatGPT-generated abstracts differ more in frequencies but less in major discourse functions. The similarities and differences can be attributed to ChatGPT's working mechanism, training process, and limitation in accomplishing domain-specific tasks.
为了识别人类写作和chatgpt生成的学术文本之间更基本和更微妙的异同,并加强法学硕士的开发和应用以及对人类语言的理解,我们使用自建的语料库,结合自下而上的方法和统计方法,比较了人类写作和chatgpt生成的英语研究论文摘要中8个学科的元话语变化。结果表明,在人类撰写的摘要和chatgpt生成的摘要中,元话语的学科变化大体上一致,但在细节上不一致。一般来说,在这两种类型的摘要中,所有学科都使用元话语来完成三种广泛和八种具体的话语功能:提到文本参与者(提到作者,提到文本),描述文本动作(介绍,争论,发现,呈现),描述文本情况(照片标记,代码注释),其中提到文本参与者和介绍是突出的。此外,两类摘要的学科在频率和话语功能上都呈现出软硬学科的划分,软学科的元话语标记和主要话语功能更为普遍。具体来说,与人类撰写的摘要学科相比,chatgpt生成的摘要在频率上差异更大,但在主要话语功能上差异更小。其异同可归因于ChatGPT的工作机制、训练过程以及在完成特定领域任务方面的局限性。
{"title":"Disciplinary variation of metadiscourse: A comparison of human-written and ChatGPT-generated English research article abstracts","authors":"Man Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiawei Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101540","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101540","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In order to identify more fundamental and subtler similarities and differences between human-written and ChatGPT-generated academic texts, and enhance the development and application of LLMs and understanding of human language, we use a self-built corpus and incorporate a bottom-up approach and statistical methods to compare metadiscourse variation across eight disciplines in human-written and ChatGPT-generated English research article abstracts. Results show that disciplinary variation of metadiscourse in human-written and ChatGPT-generated abstracts agrees in general but not in detail. Generally, in both types of abstracts, all disciplines use metadiscourse to fulfill three broad and eight specific discourse functions: Referring to text participants (Referring to writer, Referring to text), Describing text actions (Introducing, Arguing, Finding, Presenting), Describing text circumstances (Phoric marking, Code glossing), among which Referring to text participants and Introducing are prominent. Besides, disciplines in both types of abstracts exhibit the hard-soft discipline division in both frequencies and discourse functions, with metadiscourse markers and major discourse functions more prevalent in soft disciplines. Specifically, compared to disciplines of human-written abstracts, those of ChatGPT-generated abstracts differ more in frequencies but less in major discourse functions. The similarities and differences can be attributed to ChatGPT's working mechanism, training process, and limitation in accomplishing domain-specific tasks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101540"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144472057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intradisciplinary heterogeneity of academic writing: A diachronic probe into interactional metadiscourse in medical research articles 学术写作的学科内异质性:对医学研究论文中相互作用元话语的历时性探讨
IF 3.1 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-06-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101541
Chenchen Xu
While disciplinary variation of academic writing has been extensively documented, intradisciplinary investigations which promise to uncover rhetorical complexity within a discipline are relatively limited, especially from a diachronic perspective. This study examines intradisciplinary variation regarding interactional metadiscourse in medical research articles over the past 60 years. Based on a self-built corpus of 1530 research articles from 18 subdisciplines of medicine, this study revealed divergences between subdisciplines and the overall medical discipline in the use of interactional metadiscourse. Intradisciplinary variations were found in both the distribution of interactional metadiscourse across the 18 subdisciplines and the changes of these resources across the subdisciplines. The variations may be attributed to the nature of evidence, research methods, development stages, and realistic environments of subdisciplines. These findings offer diachronic evidence of intradisciplinary heterogeneity in academic writing and contribute to our understanding of changing writing practices and rhetorical complexity within a discipline.
虽然学术写作的学科差异已经被广泛记录,但学科内部的调查却相对有限,特别是从历时的角度来看,这些调查有望揭示学科内修辞的复杂性。本研究检视过去60年来医学研究文章中有关互动元语篇的学科内变异。本研究基于自建的医学18个分支学科1530篇研究论文的语料库,揭示了分支学科与整体医学学科在相互作用元话语使用方面的差异。交互元话语在18个子学科间的分布和这些资源在个子学科间的变化均存在学科内差异。这些差异可归因于证据的性质、研究方法、发展阶段和子学科的现实环境。这些发现为学术写作的跨学科异质性提供了历时性证据,并有助于我们理解学科内不断变化的写作实践和修辞复杂性。
{"title":"Intradisciplinary heterogeneity of academic writing: A diachronic probe into interactional metadiscourse in medical research articles","authors":"Chenchen Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101541","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101541","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While disciplinary variation of academic writing has been extensively documented, intradisciplinary investigations which promise to uncover rhetorical complexity within a discipline are relatively limited, especially from a diachronic perspective. This study examines intradisciplinary variation regarding interactional metadiscourse in medical research articles over the past 60 years. Based on a self-built corpus of 1530 research articles from 18 subdisciplines of medicine, this study revealed divergences between subdisciplines and the overall medical discipline in the use of interactional metadiscourse. Intradisciplinary variations were found in both the distribution of interactional metadiscourse across the 18 subdisciplines and the changes of these resources across the subdisciplines. The variations may be attributed to the nature of evidence, research methods, development stages, and realistic environments of subdisciplines. These findings offer diachronic evidence of intradisciplinary heterogeneity in academic writing and contribute to our understanding of changing writing practices and rhetorical complexity within a discipline.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101541"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144312641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“Such comparison fails to …”: The neglected open-ended negatives in the literature review section of social science research articles “这样的比较未能……”:社会科学研究论文文献综述部分被忽视的开放式否定
IF 3.1 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-06-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101539
Chenchen Xu , Fang Xu
Despite increased focus on negation in academic writing, studies mainly center on closed-class negatives (e.g., not, no, never). Nevertheless, negation can also be manifested through an open-ended array of forms (e.g., fail, lack, insufficient), which are acknowledged in natural language research yet often overlooked in academic discourse analysis. This study examines the frequency and communicative functions of open-ended negatives in contrast to closed negatives within the literature review section of 180 English research articles across six social science disciplines. Given the practical complexity of identifying open-ended negatives, the study retrieved and analyzed negation instances through a combination of a large language model and manual inspection. It was found that open-ended negatives display a higher occurrence than closed negatives. In comparison to closed negatives, open-ended negatives are utilized more frequently in performing both informational and affective communicative functions and provide more alternatives for adjusting the force of propositions. These results suggest that the hitherto neglected open-ended negatives are crucial linguistic resources in academic writing, affording writers great flexibility in selecting expressions of negation and establishing positions with modulated force.
尽管越来越多的人关注学术写作中的否定,但研究主要集中在封闭课堂的否定(例如,not, no, never)。然而,否定也可以通过一系列开放式的形式表现出来(例如,fail, lack,不足),这些形式在自然语言研究中得到承认,但在学术话语分析中往往被忽视。本研究通过对6个社会科学学科的180篇英语研究论文的文献综述部分,对比开放式否定和封闭式否定的使用频率和交际功能。考虑到识别开放式否定的实际复杂性,该研究通过结合大型语言模型和人工检查来检索和分析否定实例。结果发现,开放式否定比封闭式否定的发生率高。与封闭否定相比,开放式否定在信息和情感交际功能上的使用频率更高,并为调整命题的力量提供了更多的选择。这些结果表明,迄今为止被忽视的开放式否定是学术写作中至关重要的语言资源,它为作者在选择否定表达和以调节力量建立立场方面提供了很大的灵活性。
{"title":"“Such comparison fails to …”: The neglected open-ended negatives in the literature review section of social science research articles","authors":"Chenchen Xu ,&nbsp;Fang Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101539","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101539","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite increased focus on negation in academic writing, studies mainly center on closed-class negatives (e.g., <em>not</em>, <em>no</em>, <em>never</em>). Nevertheless, negation can also be manifested through an open-ended array of forms (e.g., <em>fail</em>, <em>lack</em>, <em>insufficient</em>), which are acknowledged in natural language research yet often overlooked in academic discourse analysis. This study examines the frequency and communicative functions of open-ended negatives in contrast to closed negatives within the literature review section of 180 English research articles across six social science disciplines. Given the practical complexity of identifying open-ended negatives, the study retrieved and analyzed negation instances through a combination of a large language model and manual inspection. It was found that open-ended negatives display a higher occurrence than closed negatives. In comparison to closed negatives, open-ended negatives are utilized more frequently in performing both informational and affective communicative functions and provide more alternatives for adjusting the force of propositions. These results suggest that the hitherto neglected open-ended negatives are crucial linguistic resources in academic writing, affording writers great flexibility in selecting expressions of negation and establishing positions with modulated force.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101539"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144269985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring inclusive teaching practices of English for Academic Purposes (EAP) in Higher Education (HE): Recommendations for practice 探讨高等教育学术英语(EAP)的包容性教学实践:实践建议
IF 3.1 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-06-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101538
A. Bakogiannis , E. Papavasiliou
This study presents a context-sensitive, evidence-informed framework for inclusive English for Academic Purposes (EAP) in Higher Education (HE), developed through a rigorous, multi-method research design. In response to persistent gaps in how inclusivity is conceptualised and implemented in EAP settings, the study integrates data from a qualitative survey, co-production focus groups, and a systematic literature review using Best Fit Framework Synthesis. Findings reveal that meaningful inclusivity in EAP requires coordinated action across three systemic levels: micro (individual practices), meso (departmental structures), and macro (institutional policies). At the micro level, inclusive pedagogy is achieved through differentiated instruction, culturally responsive teaching, equitable assessment, and reflective practice. The meso level emphasises the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration, curriculum decolonisation, and staff development, while the macro level underscores the need for institutional commitment to equity, linguistic justice, and multilingual policy. The resulting framework is both practically applicable and adaptable, offering a strategic model for embedding inclusivity into EAP instruction and aligning it with broader social justice goals. By bridging theory and practice, the study contributes to the under-researched area of EAP inclusivity and repositions EAP not as a neutral support function, but as a transformative site for advancing equity and decolonial pedagogy in higher education. The findings offer concrete recommendations for educators, programme leads, and policymakers committed to creating equitable academic environments for linguistically and culturally diverse learners.p
本研究通过严格的、多方法的研究设计,为高等教育(HE)的包容性学术英语(EAP)提供了一个上下文敏感的、循证的框架。针对包容性在EAP环境中如何概念化和实施方面持续存在的差距,该研究整合了来自定性调查、合作制作焦点小组和使用最佳契合框架综合的系统文献综述的数据。研究结果表明,EAP中有意义的包容性需要在三个系统层面协调行动:微观(个人实践)、中观(部门结构)和宏观(制度政策)。在微观层面上,包容性教学法是通过差异化教学、文化响应式教学、公平评估和反思性实践来实现的。中观层面强调跨学科合作、课程非殖民化和员工发展的重要性,而宏观层面则强调机构对公平、语言公正和多语言政策的承诺的必要性。由此产生的框架具有实际适用性和适应性,为将包容性纳入EAP教学并使其与更广泛的社会正义目标保持一致提供了一个战略模型。通过将理论与实践相结合,本研究对EAP包容性这一研究不足的领域做出了贡献,并将EAP重新定位为促进高等教育公平性和非殖民化教学法的变革场所,而不是中立的支持功能。研究结果为致力于为不同语言和文化的学习者创造公平的学术环境的教育工作者、项目负责人和政策制定者提供了具体建议
{"title":"Exploring inclusive teaching practices of English for Academic Purposes (EAP) in Higher Education (HE): Recommendations for practice","authors":"A. Bakogiannis ,&nbsp;E. Papavasiliou","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101538","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101538","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a context-sensitive, evidence-informed framework for inclusive English for Academic Purposes (EAP) in Higher Education (HE), developed through a rigorous, multi-method research design. In response to persistent gaps in how inclusivity is conceptualised and implemented in EAP settings, the study integrates data from a qualitative survey, co-production focus groups, and a systematic literature review using Best Fit Framework Synthesis. Findings reveal that meaningful inclusivity in EAP requires coordinated action across three systemic levels: micro (individual practices), meso (departmental structures), and macro (institutional policies). At the micro level, inclusive pedagogy is achieved through differentiated instruction, culturally responsive teaching, equitable assessment, and reflective practice. The meso level emphasises the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration, curriculum decolonisation, and staff development, while the macro level underscores the need for institutional commitment to equity, linguistic justice, and multilingual policy. The resulting framework is both practically applicable and adaptable, offering a strategic model for embedding inclusivity into EAP instruction and aligning it with broader social justice goals. By bridging theory and practice, the study contributes to the under-researched area of EAP inclusivity and repositions EAP not as a neutral support function, but as a transformative site for advancing equity and decolonial pedagogy in higher education. The findings offer concrete recommendations for educators, programme leads, and policymakers committed to creating equitable academic environments for linguistically and culturally diverse learners.p</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101538"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144262647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Negotiating the path to publication: Functional units and lexical bundles in author responses to peer review 协商出版之路:作者对同行评审的回应中的功能单元和词汇束
IF 3.1 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-06-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101537
Luda Liu , Feng (Kevin) Jiang
The critical role of peer-review reports in validating research quality and upholding academic integrity is well recognized. The genre of author response letters (ARLs) which address these reviews, however, remains an underexplored, yet equally significant facet of academic publishing. This study seeks to fill this gap by analysing the functional units and lexical bundles that characterize successful ARLs. Drawing on a corpus from the BMJ, we identified seven functional units in this author-reviewer interaction, including two highly frequent units (Expressing gratitude and Discussing revisions), three regular units (Providing clarifications, Accepting the feedback, and Justifying research decisions) and two infrequent units (Acknowledging limitations and Requesting further details). We also identified the recurrent lexical bundles that facilitate these communicative acts. Compared with research articles, ARLs tend to favour active verb-related bundles, which serve to outline revisions and improve the accessibility of responses for reviewers. The frequent use of participant-oriented bundles further underlines the genre's dialogic nature, where authors must navigate not only the technical aspects of feedback but also the socio-rhetorical and interpersonal dynamics. By demystifying this high-stakes genre, this research not only aids authors in coping with the reviewer feedback, but also informs pedagogical resources for EAP instruction.
同行评议报告在验证研究质量和维护学术诚信方面的关键作用是公认的。然而,针对这些评论的作者回应信(ARLs)类型仍然是一个未被充分探索的领域,但在学术出版中同样重要。本研究试图通过分析功能单位和词汇束来填补这一空白,这些功能单位和词汇束表征了成功的arl。根据英国医学杂志的语料库,我们确定了作者-审稿人互动中的七个功能单元,包括两个高频率单元(表达感谢和讨论修订),三个常规单元(提供澄清,接受反馈和证明研究决定)和两个不常见单元(承认局限性和要求进一步的细节)。我们还发现了促进这些交际行为的反复出现的词汇束。与研究性文章相比,arl倾向于使用与主动动词相关的信息包,这有助于概述修订内容,并提高审稿人对回复的可访问性。频繁使用以参与者为导向的捆绑包进一步强调了该类型的对话性质,作者不仅要驾驭反馈的技术方面,还要驾驭社会修辞和人际动态。通过揭开这种高风险类型的神秘面纱,本研究不仅帮助作者应对审稿人的反馈,而且为EAP教学提供了教学资源。
{"title":"Negotiating the path to publication: Functional units and lexical bundles in author responses to peer review","authors":"Luda Liu ,&nbsp;Feng (Kevin) Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101537","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101537","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The critical role of peer-review reports in validating research quality and upholding academic integrity is well recognized. The genre of author response letters (ARLs) which address these reviews, however, remains an underexplored, yet equally significant facet of academic publishing. This study seeks to fill this gap by analysing the functional units and lexical bundles that characterize successful ARLs. Drawing on a corpus from the BMJ, we identified seven functional units in this author-reviewer interaction, including two highly frequent units (<em>Expressing gratitude</em> and <em>Discussing revisions</em>), three regular units (<em>Providing clarifications, Accepting the feedback,</em> and <em>Justifying research decisions</em>) and two infrequent units (<em>Acknowledging limitations</em> and <em>Requesting further details</em>). We also identified the recurrent lexical bundles that facilitate these communicative acts. Compared with research articles, ARLs tend to favour active verb-related bundles, which serve to outline revisions and improve the accessibility of responses for reviewers. The frequent use of participant-oriented bundles further underlines the genre's dialogic nature, where authors must navigate not only the technical aspects of feedback but also the socio-rhetorical and interpersonal dynamics. By demystifying this high-stakes genre, this research not only aids authors in coping with the reviewer feedback, but also informs pedagogical resources for EAP instruction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101537"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144230183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Promoting research: Academic hypes embedded in the rhetorical move structure of sociology research article abstracts 促进研究:社会学研究论文摘要修辞动作结构中蕴含的学术炒作
IF 3.1 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-05-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101535
Zhijun Li , Jingyi Lin , Jinfen Xu
Under the fierce competition for getting research achievements published internationally in recent decades, the abstract serves not only as a summary of the accompanying article but also markets research. This study investigates how writers promote their research in abstracts. Based on a corpus of 210 abstracts in sociology, from a diachronic perspective, we examined how the rhetorical move structure of abstracts and academic hypes embedded therein promote or embellish aspects of research. The results revealed an increasingly complex rhetorical move structure of abstracts which encompasses a growing number of promotional steps that claim the centrality of the topic, identify the research gap and state the implications or significance of the research. Academic hypes showed a dramatic rise and were dominantly embedded in the rhetorical move of research background, method and conclusion. Implications for EAP/ESP writing and pedagogy are discussed.
近几十年来,在国际上对研究成果的激烈竞争下,摘要不仅是对相关文章的总结,而且是对市场的研究。本研究探讨作者如何在摘要中推广他们的研究。基于210篇社会学摘要的语料库,我们从历时的角度考察了摘要的修辞动作结构和其中嵌入的学术炒作如何促进或修饰研究的各个方面。结果表明,摘要的修辞动作结构日益复杂,其中包括越来越多的宣传步骤,这些步骤声称主题的中心地位,确定研究差距并说明研究的含义或意义。学术炒作急剧上升,主要体现在研究背景、研究方法和研究结论的修辞动作中。讨论了对EAP/ESP写作和教学的启示。
{"title":"Promoting research: Academic hypes embedded in the rhetorical move structure of sociology research article abstracts","authors":"Zhijun Li ,&nbsp;Jingyi Lin ,&nbsp;Jinfen Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101535","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101535","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Under the fierce competition for getting research achievements published internationally in recent decades, the abstract serves not only as a summary of the accompanying article but also markets research. This study investigates how writers promote their research in abstracts. Based on a corpus of 210 abstracts in sociology, from a diachronic perspective, we examined how the rhetorical move structure of abstracts and academic hypes embedded therein promote or embellish aspects of research. The results revealed an increasingly complex rhetorical move structure of abstracts which encompasses a growing number of promotional steps that claim the centrality of the topic, identify the research gap and state the implications or significance of the research. Academic hypes showed a dramatic rise and were dominantly embedded in the rhetorical move of research background, method and conclusion. Implications for EAP/ESP writing and pedagogy are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101535"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144170599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Kuroko workflows: Process over product in translingual reading and writing 黑子工作流程:翻译阅读和写作中的过程高于产品
IF 3.1 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-05-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101536
Julie Townsend
This article examines the reading and writing processes of Akari, a self-identified bilingual in Japanese and English, as she completed Ph.D.-level tasks. Central to the article is the concept of the kuroko workflow, which emphasizes performativity, agency, and behind-the-scenes actions of multilingual writers, as they tie together tools within and across languages. The study provides granular insight into the everyday, academic workflows and kuroko workflows that Akari used within and across English and Japanese. The findings indicate translingual reading and writing processes are systematic and part of everyday practice for Akari. Additionally, the findings point to specific tasks that lead Akari to encounter porous boundaries between Japanese and English. This research can improve direct instruction for multilingual students to navigate planning, reading, note taking, translating, formulating, and revising across tools, tasks, languages, and unforeseen disruptions. Additionally, the study demonstrates fluidity of languages, contributing to a deeper understanding of translingual practices.
这篇文章探讨了Akari的阅读和写作过程,她自称是日语和英语的双语者,她完成了博士级的任务。本文的核心是kuroko工作流的概念,它强调多语言作者的表演、代理和幕后操作,因为他们将语言内部和跨语言的工具联系在一起。这项研究为Akari在英语和日语中使用的日常学术工作流程和黑子工作流程提供了细致的见解。研究结果表明,译语阅读和写作过程是系统的,是阿卡里日常练习的一部分。此外,研究结果指出了导致Akari遇到日语和英语之间模糊界限的特定任务。这项研究可以改善多语种学生在跨工具、任务、语言和不可预见的干扰下进行计划、阅读、笔记、翻译、制定和修改的直接指导。此外,该研究还证明了语言的流动性,有助于更深入地理解翻译实践。
{"title":"Kuroko workflows: Process over product in translingual reading and writing","authors":"Julie Townsend","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101536","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101536","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article examines the reading and writing processes of Akari, a self-identified bilingual in Japanese and English, as she completed Ph.D.-level tasks. Central to the article is the concept of the <em>kuroko</em> workflow, which emphasizes performativity, agency, and behind-the-scenes actions of multilingual writers, as they tie together tools within and across languages. The study provides granular insight into the everyday, academic workflows and <em>kuroko</em> workflows that Akari used within and across English and Japanese. The findings indicate translingual reading and writing processes are systematic and part of everyday practice for Akari. Additionally, the findings point to specific tasks that lead Akari to encounter porous boundaries between Japanese and English. This research can improve direct instruction for multilingual students to navigate planning, reading, note taking, translating, formulating, and revising across tools, tasks, languages, and unforeseen disruptions. Additionally, the study demonstrates fluidity of languages, contributing to a deeper understanding of translingual practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101536"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144139215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Move-stance connection in Chinese and English research article conclusion sections: A cross-linguistic study 汉英研究文章结语部分:跨语言研究
IF 3.1 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2025-05-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101520
Liming Deng , Ping He , Xiaoping Gao
This study investigates the rhetorical structures of Chinese and English research article (RA) conclusion sections, the use of stance markers, and the move-stance connection features. The analysis is based on two corpora of 360 RAs published in international English journals and local Chinese journals in four soft disciplines (i.e., Applied Linguistics, Economics, Psychology and Sociology). Results show that both Chinese and English RA conclusions have similar distributions of moves, but there are differences in the frequencies of moves and distributions of steps. Remarkable distinctions were identified in the use of stance markers between the two corpora, with dense use of stance markers in English RA conclusions. Chinese writers tend to utilize boosters and attitude markers, while English writers prefer to employ hedges and self-mentions. Importantly, notwithstanding the identified variations in the deployment of stance markers across moves and steps, a specific move-stance connection pattern was found. The findings have both theoretical and pedagogical implications in the way of proposing the move-stance connection in RA conclusions, underscoring the convergence and divergence in the distributions of stance markers in moves/steps, and deepening novice writers’ awareness of the rhetorical devices in RAs and the importance of different competencies necessary for successful academic writing.
本研究考察了英汉研究型文章结语部分的修辞结构、立场标记的使用以及动位连接特征。该分析是基于在四个软学科(即应用语言学、经济学、心理学和社会学)的国际英文期刊和本地中文期刊上发表的360个RAs的两个语料库。结果表明,中英文RA结论的步数分布相似,但在步数频率和步数分布上存在差异。两种语料库在立场标记的使用上存在显著差异,英语RA结论中立场标记的使用较为密集。中文作家倾向于使用助推器和态度标记,而英文作家则倾向于使用模糊限制语和自我提及。重要的是,尽管确定了跨动作和步骤的姿态标记部署的变化,但发现了特定的动作-姿态连接模式。这一研究结果具有重要的理论和教学意义,它揭示了动作/步骤中姿态标记分布的趋同和差异,并加深了新手作者对动作/步骤中修辞手段和不同能力对成功学术写作的重要性的认识。
{"title":"Move-stance connection in Chinese and English research article conclusion sections: A cross-linguistic study","authors":"Liming Deng ,&nbsp;Ping He ,&nbsp;Xiaoping Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101520","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101520","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the rhetorical structures of Chinese and English research article (RA) conclusion sections, the use of stance markers, and the move-stance connection features. The analysis is based on two corpora of 360 RAs published in international English journals and local Chinese journals in four soft disciplines (i.e., Applied Linguistics, Economics, Psychology and Sociology). Results show that both Chinese and English RA conclusions have similar distributions of moves, but there are differences in the frequencies of moves and distributions of steps. Remarkable distinctions were identified in the use of stance markers between the two corpora, with dense use of stance markers in English RA conclusions. Chinese writers tend to utilize boosters and attitude markers, while English writers prefer to employ hedges and self-mentions. Importantly, notwithstanding the identified variations in the deployment of stance markers across moves and steps, a specific move-stance connection pattern was found. The findings have both theoretical and pedagogical implications in the way of proposing the move-stance connection in RA conclusions, underscoring the convergence and divergence in the distributions of stance markers in moves/steps, and deepening novice writers’ awareness of the rhetorical devices in RAs and the importance of different competencies necessary for successful academic writing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101520"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144139216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of English for Academic Purposes
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1