首页 > 最新文献

Housing Policy Debate最新文献

英文 中文
A Response to David Imbroscio: Neighborhoods Matter, and Efforts to Integrate Them Are Not Futile 回应David Imbroscio:社区很重要,整合社区的努力并非徒劳
IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-02-20 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2023.2173980
I. Ellen
Abstract Imbroscio questions both the significance of opportunity hoarding as a driver of inequality and the feasibility of stopping or moderating the phenomenon. But research shows clearly that both neighborhoods and schools are important contributors to inequality. As for futility, his claim that efforts to address exclusionary zoning will necessarily be thwarted by the flight of the affluent is simply not supported by evidence. In a perfectly integrated U.S., all neighborhoods would be about 12% poor. There is little evidence that poverty rates at this level will trigger flight of nonpoor households. As for his contention that community investments will only fuel dispossession, attracting some higher income residents doesn’t necessarily lead to wholesale resegregation. More fundamentally, Imbroscio’s pairing of these claims (the insignificance of opportunity hoarding on the one hand and the futility of addressing it on the other) begs the question: If opportunity hoarding is unimportant as a driver of inequality, then why is it so difficult to stop it? Why do wealthy, white households insist on living in wealthy enclaves if neighborhood resources matter so little in sustaining their privilege? Finally, as for political infeasibility, it’s hard to believe that the road to tackling exclusionary zoning is more difficult than the road to employee-owned business and worker cooperatives. And, ultimately, it’s not clear why advocates can’t work toward greater spatial equity while also pushing for structural reforms in the labor market.
Imbroscio质疑机会囤积作为不平等驱动因素的重要性,以及阻止或缓和这种现象的可行性。但研究清楚地表明,社区和学校都是造成不平等的重要因素。至于徒劳无功,他声称解决排他性分区的努力必然会因富人逃离而受挫,这根本没有证据支持。在一个完全一体化的美国,所有社区的贫困率将达到12%左右。几乎没有证据表明这个水平的贫困率会引发非贫困家庭的外逃。至于他的论点,即社区投资只会加剧剥夺,吸引一些高收入居民并不一定会导致大规模的重新隔离。更根本的是,Imbroscio将这些观点(一方面是机会囤积的不重要性,另一方面是解决它的徒劳)结合起来,引出了一个问题:如果机会囤积作为不平等的驱动因素是不重要的,那么为什么要阻止它如此困难?如果社区资源对维持他们的特权的作用如此之小,为什么富裕的白人家庭坚持住在富裕的飞地里?最后,至于政治上的不可行性,很难相信解决排他性区划的道路比员工所有的企业和工人合作社的道路更困难。最后,不清楚为什么倡导者不能在推动劳动力市场结构性改革的同时,努力实现更大的空间公平。
{"title":"A Response to David Imbroscio: Neighborhoods Matter, and Efforts to Integrate Them Are Not Futile","authors":"I. Ellen","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2023.2173980","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2023.2173980","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Imbroscio questions both the significance of opportunity hoarding as a driver of inequality and the feasibility of stopping or moderating the phenomenon. But research shows clearly that both neighborhoods and schools are important contributors to inequality. As for futility, his claim that efforts to address exclusionary zoning will necessarily be thwarted by the flight of the affluent is simply not supported by evidence. In a perfectly integrated U.S., all neighborhoods would be about 12% poor. There is little evidence that poverty rates at this level will trigger flight of nonpoor households. As for his contention that community investments will only fuel dispossession, attracting some higher income residents doesn’t necessarily lead to wholesale resegregation. More fundamentally, Imbroscio’s pairing of these claims (the insignificance of opportunity hoarding on the one hand and the futility of addressing it on the other) begs the question: If opportunity hoarding is unimportant as a driver of inequality, then why is it so difficult to stop it? Why do wealthy, white households insist on living in wealthy enclaves if neighborhood resources matter so little in sustaining their privilege? Finally, as for political infeasibility, it’s hard to believe that the road to tackling exclusionary zoning is more difficult than the road to employee-owned business and worker cooperatives. And, ultimately, it’s not clear why advocates can’t work toward greater spatial equity while also pushing for structural reforms in the labor market.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":"33 1","pages":"789 - 792"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44158190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Toward a New Project for Equality and Justice—In Housing, and Beyond: A Rejoinder 迈向平等与正义的新项目——在住房及其他领域:答辩书
IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-02-17 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2023.2173985
D. Imbroscio
Abstract I offer a rejoinder to the five responses to my article, “Beyond Opportunity Hoarding,” generously provided by Professors Bates, Dawkins, Ellen, Greenlee, and Lens. I argue it is imperative we face soberly three central problematics looming over the current debate: a) the enormity and profoundness of America's urban problems; b) the failure of the Opportunity Project to address these problems; and c) the reasons for this failure. I conclude by reiterating the need for an alternative strategy (or a new Project) to advance equality and justice, one built around a robust and large-scale program of Community Wealth Building. I discuss Community Wealth Building's appropriateness as an area of inquiry and engagement for housing researchers and practitioners, and I consider the challenges confronting its feasibility in light of several salient (and hopeful) political and social developments unfolding in contemporary urban America.
贝茨教授、道金斯教授、艾伦教授、格林利教授和伦斯教授慷慨地对我的文章《超越机会囤积》做出了五次回应,我对此予以反驳。我认为,我们必须冷静地面对笼罩在当前辩论中的三个核心问题:a)美国城市问题的严重性和深刻性;b)机遇项目未能解决这些问题;c)失败的原因。最后,我重申需要一个替代战略(或一个新的项目)来促进平等和正义,一个围绕一个强大的、大规模的社区财富建设项目建立的战略。我讨论了社区财富建设的适当性,作为住房研究人员和实践者的一个研究和参与领域,我考虑了其可行性所面临的挑战,根据当代美国城市中出现的几个突出的(和有希望的)政治和社会发展。
{"title":"Toward a New Project for Equality and Justice—In Housing, and Beyond: A Rejoinder","authors":"D. Imbroscio","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2023.2173985","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2023.2173985","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract I offer a rejoinder to the five responses to my article, “Beyond Opportunity Hoarding,” generously provided by Professors Bates, Dawkins, Ellen, Greenlee, and Lens. I argue it is imperative we face soberly three central problematics looming over the current debate: a) the enormity and profoundness of America's urban problems; b) the failure of the Opportunity Project to address these problems; and c) the reasons for this failure. I conclude by reiterating the need for an alternative strategy (or a new Project) to advance equality and justice, one built around a robust and large-scale program of Community Wealth Building. I discuss Community Wealth Building's appropriateness as an area of inquiry and engagement for housing researchers and practitioners, and I consider the challenges confronting its feasibility in light of several salient (and hopeful) political and social developments unfolding in contemporary urban America.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":"33 1","pages":"812 - 820"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41350592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beyond Opportunity Hoarding: Interrogating Its Limits as an Account of Urban Inequalities 超越机会囤积:作为城市不平等的一种解释来质疑其局限性
IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-02-17 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2023.2173979
D. Imbroscio
Abstract To account for the extensive inequalities manifest within urban (or metropolitan) areas in the United States, the idea of “opportunity hoarding” has garnered increasing salience. When applied to explain urban inequalities, the focus of opportunity hoarding is on places—especially how residents of affluent, predominantly White residential neighborhoods or political jurisdictions are able to secure a plethora of opportunities for themselves and especially their children, at the expense of those living in less privileged places. I interrogate the account of American urban inequalities embedded within the idea of opportunity hoarding, finding it to be limited in significant ways. In light of these findings, I discuss what a superior account of urban inequalities might look like, and suggest how this account points toward potentially more efficacious strategies to attack these inequalities, perhaps ushering in a more just future for American cities and metros.
摘要为了解释美国城市(或大都市)地区普遍存在的不平等现象,“囤积机会”的想法越来越突出。当应用于解释城市不平等时,机会囤积的重点是地方——尤其是富裕的、以白人为主的住宅区或政治管辖区的居民如何能够为自己,尤其是他们的孩子,以牺牲那些生活在弱势地区的人为代价,获得过多的机会。我质疑了美国城市不平等的说法,这种说法植根于机会囤积的理念中,发现它在很大程度上是有限的。根据这些发现,我讨论了对城市不平等的优越描述可能是什么样子的,并建议这种描述如何指向潜在的更有效的策略来解决这些不平等问题,也许会为美国城市和地铁带来一个更公正的未来。
{"title":"Beyond Opportunity Hoarding: Interrogating Its Limits as an Account of Urban Inequalities","authors":"D. Imbroscio","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2023.2173979","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2023.2173979","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract To account for the extensive inequalities manifest within urban (or metropolitan) areas in the United States, the idea of “opportunity hoarding” has garnered increasing salience. When applied to explain urban inequalities, the focus of opportunity hoarding is on places—especially how residents of affluent, predominantly White residential neighborhoods or political jurisdictions are able to secure a plethora of opportunities for themselves and especially their children, at the expense of those living in less privileged places. I interrogate the account of American urban inequalities embedded within the idea of opportunity hoarding, finding it to be limited in significant ways. In light of these findings, I discuss what a superior account of urban inequalities might look like, and suggest how this account points toward potentially more efficacious strategies to attack these inequalities, perhaps ushering in a more just future for American cities and metros.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":"33 1","pages":"770 - 788"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49098020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Follow the Money (Deeper)—A Clinical Diagnosis of Opportunity Hoarding 追随金钱(更深层次)——机会囤积的临床诊断
IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-02-15 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2023.2173984
Andrew J. Greenlee
Abstract In his argument for a rereading of opportunity hoarding and related policy prescriptions, David Imbroscio provides evidence for the misdiagnosis of elements of the problem vis-à-vis the entry and exit hypotheses consequentially resulting in limited effectiveness of common “prescribed treatments” for this behavior. His way forward focuses on a fundamental rebalancing of the instruments through which wealth is distributed to create more parity—a breaking up of the hoard. Thinking about his argument, I offer three additional premises that ask us to look more closely at how we treat the symptoms of opportunity hoarding, in a way that reflects the power of the mechanisms that sustain it.
David Imbroscio在重新解读机会囤积和相关政策处方的论点中,提供了对问题要素的误诊的证据,即-à-vis进入和退出假设必然导致对这种行为的常见“规定治疗”的有效性有限。他的前进之路集中在对财富分配工具进行根本性的再平衡,以创造更多的平等——打破囤积。考虑到他的论点,我提出了另外三个前提,要求我们更仔细地审视我们如何对待机会囤积的症状,以一种反映维持它的机制的力量的方式。
{"title":"Follow the Money (Deeper)—A Clinical Diagnosis of Opportunity Hoarding","authors":"Andrew J. Greenlee","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2023.2173984","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2023.2173984","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In his argument for a rereading of opportunity hoarding and related policy prescriptions, David Imbroscio provides evidence for the misdiagnosis of elements of the problem vis-à-vis the entry and exit hypotheses consequentially resulting in limited effectiveness of common “prescribed treatments” for this behavior. His way forward focuses on a fundamental rebalancing of the instruments through which wealth is distributed to create more parity—a breaking up of the hoard. Thinking about his argument, I offer three additional premises that ask us to look more closely at how we treat the symptoms of opportunity hoarding, in a way that reflects the power of the mechanisms that sustain it.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":"33 1","pages":"806 - 811"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46781625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Geography of Absence: Cities, Towns, and Suburbs with No LIHTC Housing 缺席的地理:没有LIHTC住房的城市、城镇和郊区
IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-02-15 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2023.2171740
A. Schwartz, Kirk McClure
Abstract The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) is the largest affordable housing production program in the United States. The program has been the subject of some criticism because it has done an unimpressive job of placing low-income renter households in high-opportunity neighborhoods, especially in suburban jurisdictions. This research examines, at the municipal level, what kinds of communities do not contain LIHTC properties. Communities with no LIHTC properties are compared with places that include LITHC housing in terms of geographic, demographic, socioeconomic, and housing-stock characteristics. The analysis focuses on all municipalities in the US and those that grew in population and multifamily housing from 2010 to 2019. It finds that 72% of all municipalities, and 52% of all growing municipalities contain no LIHTC housing. A logit analysis of the factors that influence the likelihood that LIHTC housing is absent from a municipality finds that the most important predictors are population size, being a suburb in a large metropolitan area, and the percentage of rental and multifamily housing.
摘要低收入住房税收抵免(LIHTC)是美国最大的经济适用房生产计划。该计划一直受到一些批评,因为它在将低收入租房家庭安置在高机会社区方面做得并不出色,尤其是在郊区司法管辖区。这项研究在市一级调查了哪些类型的社区不包含LIHTC财产。在地理、人口、社会经济和住房存量特征方面,将没有LIHTC房产的社区与包括LITHC住房的地方进行比较。该分析重点关注美国所有城市,以及2010年至2019年人口和多户住宅增长的城市。调查发现,72%的城市和52%的发展中的城市没有LIHTC住房。对影响市政当局缺乏LIHTC住房可能性的因素进行的logit分析发现,最重要的预测因素是人口规模,作为大城市地区的郊区,以及出租和多户住房的百分比。
{"title":"The Geography of Absence: Cities, Towns, and Suburbs with No LIHTC Housing","authors":"A. Schwartz, Kirk McClure","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2023.2171740","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2023.2171740","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) is the largest affordable housing production program in the United States. The program has been the subject of some criticism because it has done an unimpressive job of placing low-income renter households in high-opportunity neighborhoods, especially in suburban jurisdictions. This research examines, at the municipal level, what kinds of communities do not contain LIHTC properties. Communities with no LIHTC properties are compared with places that include LITHC housing in terms of geographic, demographic, socioeconomic, and housing-stock characteristics. The analysis focuses on all municipalities in the US and those that grew in population and multifamily housing from 2010 to 2019. It finds that 72% of all municipalities, and 52% of all growing municipalities contain no LIHTC housing. A logit analysis of the factors that influence the likelihood that LIHTC housing is absent from a municipality finds that the most important predictors are population size, being a suburb in a large metropolitan area, and the percentage of rental and multifamily housing.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":"33 1","pages":"963 - 982"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41783698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bringing Institutions Into the Opportunity Hoarding Debate 将机构纳入机会囤积辩论
IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-02-14 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2023.2173981
Casey J. Dawkins
Abstract David Imbroscio’s “Beyond Opportunity Hoarding: Interrogating its Limits as an Account of Urban Inequalities” takes issue with the recent scholarly attention given to the concept of opportunity hoarding. Imbroscio worries that opportunity hoarding accounts of metropolitan inequalities place too much emphasis on the role of education and unequal patterns of consumption while ignoring the growing weakness of labor power vis-à-vis capital and the extreme concentration of capital ownership at the top of the wealth distribution. In this comment, I argue that Imbroscio downplays the importance of the institutions that generate metropolitan inequalities in the US. Imbroscio dismisses the two institutional processes that contribute to opportunity hoarding (barriers to the entry of people and the exit of resources) without providing a complete account of how the institutions of homeownership and fiscal decentralization work together to erect barriers to entry and exit. To dismiss entry and exit as solutions to opportunity hoarding without assigning blame to the institutions that stand in the way is to miss the forest for the trees.
摘要David Imbroscio的《超越机会囤积:作为城市不平等的一种解释来质疑其极限》对最近学术界对机会囤积概念的关注提出了质疑。Imbroscio担心,对大都市不平等的机会囤积解释过于强调教育的作用和不平等的消费模式,而忽视了劳动力相对于资本的日益疲软以及资本所有权极端集中在财富分配的顶端。在这篇评论中,我认为Imbroscio淡化了在美国造成大都市不平等的制度的重要性。Imbroscio驳斥了导致机会囤积的两个制度过程(人员进入和资源退出的障碍),但没有完整说明住房所有权和财政权力下放机构如何共同建立进入和退出的障碍。如果不将进入和退出视为囤积机会的解决方案,而不将责任归咎于挡道的机构,那就是以毒攻毒。
{"title":"Bringing Institutions Into the Opportunity Hoarding Debate","authors":"Casey J. Dawkins","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2023.2173981","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2023.2173981","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract David Imbroscio’s “Beyond Opportunity Hoarding: Interrogating its Limits as an Account of Urban Inequalities” takes issue with the recent scholarly attention given to the concept of opportunity hoarding. Imbroscio worries that opportunity hoarding accounts of metropolitan inequalities place too much emphasis on the role of education and unequal patterns of consumption while ignoring the growing weakness of labor power vis-à-vis capital and the extreme concentration of capital ownership at the top of the wealth distribution. In this comment, I argue that Imbroscio downplays the importance of the institutions that generate metropolitan inequalities in the US. Imbroscio dismisses the two institutional processes that contribute to opportunity hoarding (barriers to the entry of people and the exit of resources) without providing a complete account of how the institutions of homeownership and fiscal decentralization work together to erect barriers to entry and exit. To dismiss entry and exit as solutions to opportunity hoarding without assigning blame to the institutions that stand in the way is to miss the forest for the trees.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":"33 1","pages":"793 - 796"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42401804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
What is an Opportunity Enthusiast to Do? 机遇爱好者该怎么做?
IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-02-13 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2023.2173982
Michael C. Lens
Abstract David Imbroscio offers a useful pushback against groupthink among scholars studying neighborhood opportunity, even if I quibble with the details. Imbroscio sometimes conflates problem definition with solution feasibility, and ultimately points to some solutions to economic inequality that may be even less feasible than those offered by the opportunity enthusiasts. Further, the broader problems of economic inequality are well known to housing scholars, but often lie outside their scope and expertise. Imbroscio does push the field to put community wealth building institutions and options more central to housing and neighborhood scholarship and policy, which bridges macroeconomic issues with neighborhood inequality ones.
David Imbroscio对研究邻里机会的学者的群体思维提出了一个有用的反驳,即使我对细节进行了吹毛求疵。Imbroscio有时将问题定义与解决方案可行性混为一谈,并最终指出了一些解决经济不平等的方案,这些方案可能比机会狂热者提供的方案更不可行。此外,更广泛的经济不平等问题对住房学者来说是众所周知的,但往往超出了他们的范围和专长。Imbroscio确实推动该领域将社区财富建设机构和选择置于住房和社区奖学金和政策的更中心位置,这将宏观经济问题与社区不平等问题联系起来。
{"title":"What is an Opportunity Enthusiast to Do?","authors":"Michael C. Lens","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2023.2173982","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2023.2173982","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract David Imbroscio offers a useful pushback against groupthink among scholars studying neighborhood opportunity, even if I quibble with the details. Imbroscio sometimes conflates problem definition with solution feasibility, and ultimately points to some solutions to economic inequality that may be even less feasible than those offered by the opportunity enthusiasts. Further, the broader problems of economic inequality are well known to housing scholars, but often lie outside their scope and expertise. Imbroscio does push the field to put community wealth building institutions and options more central to housing and neighborhood scholarship and policy, which bridges macroeconomic issues with neighborhood inequality ones.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":"33 1","pages":"797 - 801"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48436247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Editor’s Introduction to the Forum: Beyond Opportunity Hoarding 论坛编辑简介:超越机遇囤积
IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-02-13 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2023.2174666
G. Galster
{"title":"Editor’s Introduction to the Forum: Beyond Opportunity Hoarding","authors":"G. Galster","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2023.2174666","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2023.2174666","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47911777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Research Agenda Pending Revolution 等待革命的研究议程
IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-02-13 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2023.2173983
Lisa K. Bates
Abstract This essay responds to David Imbroscio’s “Beyond Opportunity Hoarding: Interrogating Its Limits as an Account of Urban Inequities” by suggesting questions that researchers might ask about opportunity hoarding if they considered the concept through a Black epistemic lens. I propose that investigating cultural, cognitive, and psychological commitments to hoarding as a key feature of Whiteness and racial capitalism might lead to insights on how to divest from and ultimately dismantle these systems.
摘要本文回应了David Imbroscio的《超越机会囤积:作为城市不平等的一种解释来质疑其极限》,提出了研究人员如果从黑人认识论的角度考虑机会囤积的概念,可能会问的问题。我建议,调查对囤积的文化、认知和心理承诺,将其作为白人和种族资本主义的一个关键特征,可能会深入了解如何摆脱并最终废除这些制度。
{"title":"A Research Agenda Pending Revolution","authors":"Lisa K. Bates","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2023.2173983","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2023.2173983","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This essay responds to David Imbroscio’s “Beyond Opportunity Hoarding: Interrogating Its Limits as an Account of Urban Inequities” by suggesting questions that researchers might ask about opportunity hoarding if they considered the concept through a Black epistemic lens. I propose that investigating cultural, cognitive, and psychological commitments to hoarding as a key feature of Whiteness and racial capitalism might lead to insights on how to divest from and ultimately dismantle these systems.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":"33 1","pages":"802 - 805"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49224899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
How Accommodative Are Houses in Trinidad? Implications for Older Persons With Disabilities 特立尼达的房子有多舒适?对残疾老年人的影响
IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2023.2169586
B. Parey, Leeann Sinanan
ABSTRACT This paper examines the accommodation in houses in Trinidad in the context of older persons with disabilities. An exploratory sequential mixed-methods research design was used. In the qualitative phase, a list of accommodation items was identified via interviews. This information was used to develop a questionnaire to measure accommodation items of a large nationally representative sample of houses in Trinidad. Only physical accessibility items were identified, and data from 768 houses indicated that no house had all identified items. There is a need for urgent adoption and implementation of accessibility standards. Findings also indicate modification cost is a challenge and that responses targeted to low-income and rural households are needed. Lastly, the social care context, specifically the family care potential, is an important consideration in housing policy debates, and community homes for the aged and programs involving multiple experts to identify and support housing modification are recommended.
摘要:本文考察了特立尼达残疾人住房的住宿情况。采用探索性顺序混合方法研究设计。在定性阶段,通过访谈确定了住宿项目清单。这些资料被用来编制一份调查表,以衡量特立尼达具有全国代表性的大型房屋样本的住宿项目。只确定了物理无障碍项目,来自768所房屋的数据表明,没有一所房屋拥有所有确定的项目。迫切需要采用和实施无障碍标准。调查结果还表明,改造成本是一项挑战,需要针对低收入和农村家庭采取应对措施。最后,社会护理背景,特别是家庭护理潜力,是住房政策辩论中的一个重要考虑因素,建议社区老年之家和涉及多名专家的项目来确定和支持住房改造。
{"title":"How Accommodative Are Houses in Trinidad? Implications for Older Persons With Disabilities","authors":"B. Parey, Leeann Sinanan","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2023.2169586","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2023.2169586","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper examines the accommodation in houses in Trinidad in the context of older persons with disabilities. An exploratory sequential mixed-methods research design was used. In the qualitative phase, a list of accommodation items was identified via interviews. This information was used to develop a questionnaire to measure accommodation items of a large nationally representative sample of houses in Trinidad. Only physical accessibility items were identified, and data from 768 houses indicated that no house had all identified items. There is a need for urgent adoption and implementation of accessibility standards. Findings also indicate modification cost is a challenge and that responses targeted to low-income and rural households are needed. Lastly, the social care context, specifically the family care potential, is an important consideration in housing policy debates, and community homes for the aged and programs involving multiple experts to identify and support housing modification are recommended.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":"33 1","pages":"746 - 766"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41832321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Housing Policy Debate
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1