首页 > 最新文献

Health Care Management Review最新文献

英文 中文
Body work and body meanings in patient-centered care: Health care professionals and patients with disabilities in Italian hospitals. 以病人为中心的护理中的身体工作和身体意义:意大利医院中的医护人员和残疾病人。
IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-08 DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000396
Greta Elisabetta Brizio, Chiara Paolino

Background: This study integrates patient-centered care (PCC) research and body work studies to understand how a focus on physical and sensorial aspects in the relationship between health care professionals (HPs) and patients contribute to the implementation of PCC.

Purpose: To understand how HPs' body work practices contribute to the implementation of PCC, we investigate the meanings HPs ascribe to their and to patients' bodies. The goal is to grasp how these practices and meanings, rooted in unexplored sensorial perceptions, account for the emergence of a relationship of mutual acknowledgment between HPs and patients.

Methodology: Thirty-nine in-depth interviews were carried out with HPs, who interact with patients with disabilities in Italian hospitals.

Results: HPs engage in different body work practices: adopting a diagnostic gaze and an empathetic gaze, touching, and playing. The diagnostic gaze concurs to create a feeling of promptness between HPs and patients, but also a stronger distance with respect to other practices. The empathetic gaze, touching, and playing are associated with feelings of shared vulnerability and resilience. These shared perceptions and emotions build a common ground and shape a relationship focused on patients' involvement.

Practice implications: Voicing and feedback sessions can be arranged to listen to how HPs interpret their own and patients' bodies. An organizational culture acknowledging emotions should be promoted to sponsor among HPs the consideration of the sensorial aspects of their connection with patients. The value of bricolage should be observed, where the HPs feel free to readjust tools, spaces, and routines. Sensitivity training exercises should be arranged to understand the interactions with patients with disabilities.

背景:目的:为了了解医护人员的身体工作实践如何促进以患者为中心的护理(PCC)的实施,我们对医护人员赋予自己和患者身体的意义进行了调查。我们的目标是掌握这些植根于未被探索的感官认知的实践和意义,是如何在惠普医生和患者之间建立起相互承认的关系的:对意大利医院中与残疾病人互动的保健医生进行了 39 次深入访谈:结果:保健医生参与了不同的肢体工作实践:采用诊断性凝视和移情凝视、触摸和玩耍。诊断性凝视会在医护人员和病人之间产生一种迅速感,但与其他做法相比,也会产生更强的距离感。移情凝视、抚摸和玩耍则与共同的脆弱感和复原力有关。这些共同的认知和情感建立了一个共同的基础,并形成了一种以患者参与为重点的关系:实践意义:可以安排发声和反馈会议,倾听医护人员如何解释自己和患者的身体。应提倡一种承认情感的组织文化,以促进医疗服务人员考虑与患者之间的感官联系。应注意 "反复使用 "的价值,让医疗服务人员能够自由地重新调整工具、空间和常规。应安排敏感性培训练习,以了解与残疾病人的互动。
{"title":"Body work and body meanings in patient-centered care: Health care professionals and patients with disabilities in Italian hospitals.","authors":"Greta Elisabetta Brizio, Chiara Paolino","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000396","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000396","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study integrates patient-centered care (PCC) research and body work studies to understand how a focus on physical and sensorial aspects in the relationship between health care professionals (HPs) and patients contribute to the implementation of PCC.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To understand how HPs' body work practices contribute to the implementation of PCC, we investigate the meanings HPs ascribe to their and to patients' bodies. The goal is to grasp how these practices and meanings, rooted in unexplored sensorial perceptions, account for the emergence of a relationship of mutual acknowledgment between HPs and patients.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Thirty-nine in-depth interviews were carried out with HPs, who interact with patients with disabilities in Italian hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HPs engage in different body work practices: adopting a diagnostic gaze and an empathetic gaze, touching, and playing. The diagnostic gaze concurs to create a feeling of promptness between HPs and patients, but also a stronger distance with respect to other practices. The empathetic gaze, touching, and playing are associated with feelings of shared vulnerability and resilience. These shared perceptions and emotions build a common ground and shape a relationship focused on patients' involvement.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Voicing and feedback sessions can be arranged to listen to how HPs interpret their own and patients' bodies. An organizational culture acknowledging emotions should be promoted to sponsor among HPs the consideration of the sensorial aspects of their connection with patients. The value of bricolage should be observed, where the HPs feel free to readjust tools, spaces, and routines. Sensitivity training exercises should be arranged to understand the interactions with patients with disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":" ","pages":"103-115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139730735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of leader member exchange quality and differentiation on counterproductive and citizenship behavior in health care teams. 领导成员交流质量和差异化对医疗团队中反作用行为和公民行为的影响。
IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-08 DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000394
Rebecca Mitchell, Jun Gu, Brendan Boyle

Background: Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) may increase service quality. In contrast, counterproductive work behavior (CWB) may undermine patient safety. Efforts to increase OCB and reduce CWB rely on a good understanding of their antecedents, yet there is a lack of research in health care to inform such endeavors.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the role of leadership, specifically leader-member exchange (LMX), in reducing CWB and increasing OCB in health care teams.

Methodology/approach: Team survey data were collected from 75 teams in U.S. health services organizations. Polynomial regression and response surface analysis was used to investigate our hypotheses.

Results: For OCB, the response surface along the line of incongruence (a3) was positive and significant, and for CWB, a3 was negative and significant.

Conclusion: The results of polynomial regression and response surface analysis indicate that OCB increases when LMX quality is high and that LMX differentiation is comparatively lower. In contrast, CWB increases when LMX differentiation is high, whereas LMX quality is lower.

Practice implications: These findings provide useful suggestions to promote valuable extra-role behaviors in health care teams. Health care team leaders should aim to develop strong exchange relationships with all members if they wish to increase citizenship behavior and decrease counterproductive behavior. Building positive exchange relationships with only a few team members is likely to undermine citizenship behavior and increase counterproductive behavior.

背景:组织公民行为(OCB)可提高服务质量:组织公民行为(OCB)可提高服务质量。与此相反,适得其反的工作行为(CWB)可能会损害患者安全。目的:本研究旨在探讨领导力,特别是领导者与成员之间的交流(LMX)在医疗团队中减少 CWB 和增加 OCB 的作用:从美国医疗服务机构的 75 个团队中收集团队调查数据。采用多项式回归和响应面分析法来研究我们的假设:结果:对于 OCB 而言,沿着不一致线(a3)的反应面是正的且显著的,对于 CWB 而言,a3 是负的且显著的:多项式回归和响应面分析的结果表明,当 LMX 质量高且 LMX 差异相对较低时,OCB 会增加。与此相反,当 LMX 差异化程度较高而 LMX 质量较低时,CWB 会增加:这些发现为在医疗团队中促进有价值的角色外行为提供了有用的建议。如果医疗团队领导者希望增加公民行为并减少适得其反的行为,那么他们就应该致力于与所有成员建立稳固的交流关系。如果只与少数团队成员建立积极的交流关系,则很可能会削弱公民行为并增加适得其反的行为。
{"title":"The impact of leader member exchange quality and differentiation on counterproductive and citizenship behavior in health care teams.","authors":"Rebecca Mitchell, Jun Gu, Brendan Boyle","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000394","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000394","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) may increase service quality. In contrast, counterproductive work behavior (CWB) may undermine patient safety. Efforts to increase OCB and reduce CWB rely on a good understanding of their antecedents, yet there is a lack of research in health care to inform such endeavors.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the role of leadership, specifically leader-member exchange (LMX), in reducing CWB and increasing OCB in health care teams.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>Team survey data were collected from 75 teams in U.S. health services organizations. Polynomial regression and response surface analysis was used to investigate our hypotheses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For OCB, the response surface along the line of incongruence (a3) was positive and significant, and for CWB, a3 was negative and significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of polynomial regression and response surface analysis indicate that OCB increases when LMX quality is high and that LMX differentiation is comparatively lower. In contrast, CWB increases when LMX differentiation is high, whereas LMX quality is lower.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>These findings provide useful suggestions to promote valuable extra-role behaviors in health care teams. Health care team leaders should aim to develop strong exchange relationships with all members if they wish to increase citizenship behavior and decrease counterproductive behavior. Building positive exchange relationships with only a few team members is likely to undermine citizenship behavior and increase counterproductive behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":"49 2","pages":"86-93"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139941027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Physician selection for hospital integration: Theoretical considerations and empirical findings. 医院整合中的医生选择:理论考虑与实证研究结果。
IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-13 DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000395
Farbod Alinezhad, Brady Post, Gary J Young

Background: The U.S. health care system has seen an increase in hospital-physician integration, with hospitals acquiring increasing numbers of physician practices. This shift has been linked to higher costs without significant improvements in quality.

Purpose: This study sought to identify the characteristics of physicians who transitioned from independent practice to hospital integration.

Methodology/approach: We used physician variables, including quality scores, medical school rankings, years of experience, experience treating socially or medically complex patients, practice style, and location, as well as health care market and county-level variables to understand these determinants using a fixed-effects logistic regression model.

Results: A total of 101,746 physicians representing 66 clinical specialties satisfied our inclusion criteria, of which 3,656 became hospital-integrated between 2018 and 2020. The integrating physicians were generally less experienced, had lower quality scores, and generated less revenue per Medicare patient. Their patients, on average, had higher comorbidity scores, were more likely to be dually eligible, and resided in counties with higher poverty rates.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the physicians most likely to become hospital integrated are those facing reimbursement pressures due to a complex case mix and the associated challenges of performing well on the quality metrics. We also found some support for the anticompetitive aspects of hospital-physician integration. Our results suggest that hospitals are integrating with a relatively less experienced physician workforce but one that is perhaps more capable of treating clinically and socioeconomically complex patients.

Practice implications: Hospitals interested in using physician integration strategically to improve care quality should put more emphasis on physician quality. Such an approach has the potential to increase efficiency without sacrificing quality of care.

背景:美国医疗保健系统中,医院与医生的整合越来越多,医院收购了越来越多的医生诊所。目的:本研究旨在确定从独立执业过渡到医院整合的医生的特征:我们使用了医生变量,包括质量评分、医学院排名、工作年限、治疗社会或医疗复杂病人的经验、执业风格和地点,以及医疗市场和县级变量,通过固定效应逻辑回归模型来了解这些决定因素:共有代表 66 个临床专科的 101,746 名医生符合我们的纳入标准,其中 3,656 名医生在 2018 年至 2020 年期间成为医院整合医生。整合后的医生一般经验较少,质量评分较低,每名医疗保险患者的收入较少。他们的患者平均合并症评分较高,更有可能符合双重资格,并且居住在贫困率较高的县:我们的研究结果表明,最有可能进行医院整合的医生是那些面临报销压力的医生,其原因是复杂的病例组合以及在质量指标方面表现良好的相关挑战。我们还发现,医院与医生整合的反竞争方面也得到了一些支持。我们的研究结果表明,医院正在与一支经验相对较少的医生队伍进行整合,但这支队伍或许更有能力治疗临床和社会经济情况复杂的患者:实践意义:有意战略性地利用医生整合来提高医疗质量的医院应更加重视医生质量。这种方法有可能在不牺牲医疗质量的前提下提高效率。
{"title":"Physician selection for hospital integration: Theoretical considerations and empirical findings.","authors":"Farbod Alinezhad, Brady Post, Gary J Young","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000395","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000395","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The U.S. health care system has seen an increase in hospital-physician integration, with hospitals acquiring increasing numbers of physician practices. This shift has been linked to higher costs without significant improvements in quality.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study sought to identify the characteristics of physicians who transitioned from independent practice to hospital integration.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>We used physician variables, including quality scores, medical school rankings, years of experience, experience treating socially or medically complex patients, practice style, and location, as well as health care market and county-level variables to understand these determinants using a fixed-effects logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101,746 physicians representing 66 clinical specialties satisfied our inclusion criteria, of which 3,656 became hospital-integrated between 2018 and 2020. The integrating physicians were generally less experienced, had lower quality scores, and generated less revenue per Medicare patient. Their patients, on average, had higher comorbidity scores, were more likely to be dually eligible, and resided in counties with higher poverty rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that the physicians most likely to become hospital integrated are those facing reimbursement pressures due to a complex case mix and the associated challenges of performing well on the quality metrics. We also found some support for the anticompetitive aspects of hospital-physician integration. Our results suggest that hospitals are integrating with a relatively less experienced physician workforce but one that is perhaps more capable of treating clinically and socioeconomically complex patients.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Hospitals interested in using physician integration strategically to improve care quality should put more emphasis on physician quality. Such an approach has the potential to increase efficiency without sacrificing quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":" ","pages":"94-102"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139730736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
More isn't always better: Technology in the intensive care unit. 并非越多越好:重症监护室中的技术。
IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-08 DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000398
Esther Olsen, Zhanna Novikov, Theadora Sakata, Monique H Lambert, Javier Lorenzo, Roger Bohn, Sara J Singer

Background: Clinical care in modern intensive care units (ICUs) combines multidisciplinary expertise and a complex array of technologies. These technologies have clearly advanced the ability of clinicians to do more for patients, yet so much equipment also presents the possibility for cognitive overload.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate clinicians' experiences with and perceptions of technology in ICUs.

Methodology/approach: We analyzed qualitative data from 30 interviews with ICU clinicians and frontline managers within four ICUs.

Results: Our interviews identified three main challenges associated with technology in the ICU: (a) too many technologies and too much data; (b) inconsistent and inaccurate technologies; and (c) not enough integration among technologies, alignment with clinical workflows, and support for clinician identities. To address these challenges, interviewees highlighted mitigation strategies to address both social and technical systems and to achieve joint optimization.

Conclusion: When new technologies are added to the ICU, they have potential both to improve and to disrupt patient care. To successfully implement technologies in the ICU, clinicians' perspectives are crucial. Understanding clinicians' perspectives can help limit the disruptive effects of new technologies, so clinicians can focus their time and attention on providing care to patients.

Practice implications: As technology and data continue to play an increasingly important role in ICU care, everyone involved in the design, development, approval, implementation, and use of technology should work together to apply a sociotechnical systems approach to reduce possible negative effects on clinical care for critically ill patients.

背景:现代重症监护病房(ICU)的临床护理结合了多学科专业知识和一系列复杂的技术。这些技术明显提高了临床医生为病人做更多工作的能力,但如此多的设备也可能造成认知超负荷。目的:本研究旨在调查临床医生在重症监护病房使用技术的经验和对技术的看法:我们分析了与四家重症监护室的重症监护室临床医生和一线管理人员进行的 30 次访谈的定性数据:我们在访谈中发现了 ICU 技术面临的三大挑战:(a) 技术过多、数据过多;(b) 技术不一致、不准确;(c) 技术之间的整合、与临床工作流程的协调以及对临床医生身份的支持不够。为应对这些挑战,受访者强调了针对社会和技术系统的缓解策略,以实现共同优化:结论:当新技术被引入重症监护室时,它们既有可能改善病人护理,也有可能破坏病人护理。要在重症监护室成功实施技术,临床医生的观点至关重要。了解临床医生的观点有助于限制新技术的破坏性影响,这样临床医生就可以集中时间和精力为患者提供护理服务:实践意义:随着技术和数据在重症监护室护理中发挥越来越重要的作用,参与技术设计、开发、审批、实施和使用的每个人都应共同努力,采用社会技术系统方法,减少对重症患者临床护理可能产生的负面影响。
{"title":"More isn't always better: Technology in the intensive care unit.","authors":"Esther Olsen, Zhanna Novikov, Theadora Sakata, Monique H Lambert, Javier Lorenzo, Roger Bohn, Sara J Singer","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000398","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000398","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical care in modern intensive care units (ICUs) combines multidisciplinary expertise and a complex array of technologies. These technologies have clearly advanced the ability of clinicians to do more for patients, yet so much equipment also presents the possibility for cognitive overload.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate clinicians' experiences with and perceptions of technology in ICUs.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>We analyzed qualitative data from 30 interviews with ICU clinicians and frontline managers within four ICUs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our interviews identified three main challenges associated with technology in the ICU: (a) too many technologies and too much data; (b) inconsistent and inaccurate technologies; and (c) not enough integration among technologies, alignment with clinical workflows, and support for clinician identities. To address these challenges, interviewees highlighted mitigation strategies to address both social and technical systems and to achieve joint optimization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When new technologies are added to the ICU, they have potential both to improve and to disrupt patient care. To successfully implement technologies in the ICU, clinicians' perspectives are crucial. Understanding clinicians' perspectives can help limit the disruptive effects of new technologies, so clinicians can focus their time and attention on providing care to patients.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>As technology and data continue to play an increasingly important role in ICU care, everyone involved in the design, development, approval, implementation, and use of technology should work together to apply a sociotechnical systems approach to reduce possible negative effects on clinical care for critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":"49 2","pages":"127-138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139941025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Overcoming walls and voids: Responsive practices that enable frontline workers to feel heard. 克服隔阂和空白:让前线工作人员感受到倾听的响应性做法。
IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-08 DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000397
Michaela Kerrissey, Patricia Satterstrom, James Pae, Nancy M Albert

Background: There is increasing recognition that beyond frontline workers' ability to speak up, their feeling heard is also vital, both for improving work processes and reducing burnout. However, little is known about the conditions under which frontline workers feel heard.

Purpose: This inductive qualitative study identifies barriers and facilitators to feeling heard among nurses in hospitals.

Methodology: We conducted in-depth semistructured interviews with registered nurses, nurse managers, and nurse practitioners across four hospitals ( N = 24) in a U.S. health system between July 2021 and March 2022. We coded with the aim of developing new theory, generating initial codes by studying fragments of data (lines and segments), examining and refining codes across transcripts, and finally engaging in focused coding across all data collected.

Findings: Frontline nurses who spoke up confronted two types of challenges that prevented feeling heard: (a) walls, which describe organizational barriers that lead ideas to be rejected outright (e.g., empty solicitation), and (b) voids, which describe organizational gaps that lead ideas to be lost in the system (e.g., structural mazes). We identified categories of responsive practices that promoted feeling heard over walls (boundary framing, unscripting, priority enhancing) and voids (procedural transparency, identifying a navigator). These practices appeared more effective when conducted collectively over time.

Conclusion: Both walls and voids can prevent frontline workers from feeling heard, and these barriers may call for distinct managerial practices to address them. Future efforts to measure responsive practices and explore them in broader samples are needed.

Practice implications: Encouraging responsive practices may help ensure that frontline health care workers feel heard.

背景:越来越多的人认识到,除了一线工作者能够畅所欲言之外,他们感觉到自己的声音被倾听也是至关重要的,这对于改善工作流程和减少职业倦怠都是如此。目的:本归纳性定性研究旨在确定医院护士在感受到倾听时遇到的障碍和促进因素:我们在 2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 3 月期间对美国医疗系统的四家医院(N = 24)的注册护士、护士经理和执业护士进行了深入的半结构式访谈。我们编码的目的是发展新的理论,通过研究数据片段(行和段)生成初始编码,检查并完善记录誊本中的编码,最后对收集到的所有数据进行集中编码:前线护士在畅所欲言的过程中遇到了两类挑战,使其无法感受到自己的意见被倾听:(a)"墙壁",指的是导致想法被直接拒绝的组织障碍(如空洞的征求意见);(b)"空洞",指的是导致想法在系统中消失的组织差距(如结构性迷宫)。我们确定了一些应对措施类别,这些措施能让人们感觉到自己的意见被倾听,而不是被隔阂(边界框架、非脚本化、提高优先级)和空洞(程序透明、确定导航员)。这些做法在长期集体实施时似乎更为有效:结论:"墙壁 "和 "空隙 "都会阻碍前线工作者感受到倾听,这些障碍可能需要不同的管理实践来解决。今后需要努力衡量响应性实践,并在更广泛的样本中进行探索:实践启示:鼓励有回应性的实践可能有助于确保一线医护人员感受到自己的声音被倾听。
{"title":"Overcoming walls and voids: Responsive practices that enable frontline workers to feel heard.","authors":"Michaela Kerrissey, Patricia Satterstrom, James Pae, Nancy M Albert","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000397","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000397","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is increasing recognition that beyond frontline workers' ability to speak up, their feeling heard is also vital, both for improving work processes and reducing burnout. However, little is known about the conditions under which frontline workers feel heard.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This inductive qualitative study identifies barriers and facilitators to feeling heard among nurses in hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We conducted in-depth semistructured interviews with registered nurses, nurse managers, and nurse practitioners across four hospitals ( N = 24) in a U.S. health system between July 2021 and March 2022. We coded with the aim of developing new theory, generating initial codes by studying fragments of data (lines and segments), examining and refining codes across transcripts, and finally engaging in focused coding across all data collected.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Frontline nurses who spoke up confronted two types of challenges that prevented feeling heard: (a) walls, which describe organizational barriers that lead ideas to be rejected outright (e.g., empty solicitation), and (b) voids, which describe organizational gaps that lead ideas to be lost in the system (e.g., structural mazes). We identified categories of responsive practices that promoted feeling heard over walls (boundary framing, unscripting, priority enhancing) and voids (procedural transparency, identifying a navigator). These practices appeared more effective when conducted collectively over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both walls and voids can prevent frontline workers from feeling heard, and these barriers may call for distinct managerial practices to address them. Future efforts to measure responsive practices and explore them in broader samples are needed.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Encouraging responsive practices may help ensure that frontline health care workers feel heard.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":" ","pages":"116-126"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139724510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How social networks influence the local implementation of initiatives developed in quality improvement collaboratives in health care: A qualitative process study. 社会网络如何影响医疗质量改进合作计划在当地的实施:定性过程研究。
IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-08 DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000400
Sandra Gillner, Eva-Maria Wild

Background: Quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) have facilitated cross-organizational knowledge exchange in health care. However, the local implementation of many quality improvement (QI) initiatives continues to fail, signaling a need to better understand the contributing factors. Organizational context, particularly the role of social networks in facilitating or hindering implementation within organizations, remains a potentially critical yet underexplored area to addressing this gap.

Purpose: We took a dynamic process perspective to understand how QI project managers' social networks influence the local implementation of QI initiatives developed through QICs.

Methodology: We explored the case of a QIC by triangulating data from an online survey, semistructured interviews, and archival documents from 10 organizations. We divided implementation into four stages and employed qualitative text analysis to examine the relationship between three characteristics of network structure (degree centrality, network density, and betweenness centrality) and the progress of each QI initiative.

Results: The progress of QI initiatives varied considerably among organizations. The transition between stages was influenced by all three network characteristics to varying degrees, depending on the stage. Project managers whose QI initiatives progressed to advanced stages of implementation had formed ad hoc clusters of colleagues passionate about the initiatives.

Conclusion: Implementing QI initiatives appears to be facilitated by the formation of clusters of supportive individuals within organizations; this formation requires high betweenness centrality and high network density.

Practice implications: Flexibly modifying specific network characteristics depending on the stage of implementation may help project managers advance their QI initiatives, achieving more uniform results from QICs.

背景:质量改进合作(QIC)促进了医疗保健领域的跨组织知识交流。然而,许多质量改进(QI)计划在当地的实施仍然失败,这表明需要更好地了解其中的诱因。组织背景,尤其是社会网络在促进或阻碍组织内部实施方面的作用,仍是解决这一差距的一个潜在关键领域,但对这一领域的探索还很不够。目的:我们从动态过程的角度来了解质量改进项目经理的社会网络如何影响通过质量信息中心制定的质量改进计划在当地的实施:我们通过对来自 10 家组织的在线调查、半结构式访谈和档案文件中的数据进行三角分析,探讨了 QIC 的案例。我们将实施工作分为四个阶段,并采用定性文本分析法来研究网络结构的三个特征(度中心性、网络密度和度间中心性)与每项 QI 计划进展之间的关系:结果:各组织的 QI 项目进展差异很大。各阶段之间的过渡在不同程度上受到所有三个网络特征的影响,具体取决于所处的阶段。那些将质量创新行动推进到高级实施阶段的项目经理们,已经形成了由热衷于这些行动的同事组成的临时集群:结论:在组织内部形成由支持者组成的集群,似乎有利于实施质量改进措施;这种集群的形成需要高介度中心性和高网络密度:实践启示:根据实施阶段灵活调整特定的网络特征,可能有助于项目经理推进其质量改进措施,使质量信息中心取得更加一致的结果。
{"title":"How social networks influence the local implementation of initiatives developed in quality improvement collaboratives in health care: A qualitative process study.","authors":"Sandra Gillner, Eva-Maria Wild","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000400","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000400","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) have facilitated cross-organizational knowledge exchange in health care. However, the local implementation of many quality improvement (QI) initiatives continues to fail, signaling a need to better understand the contributing factors. Organizational context, particularly the role of social networks in facilitating or hindering implementation within organizations, remains a potentially critical yet underexplored area to addressing this gap.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We took a dynamic process perspective to understand how QI project managers' social networks influence the local implementation of QI initiatives developed through QICs.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We explored the case of a QIC by triangulating data from an online survey, semistructured interviews, and archival documents from 10 organizations. We divided implementation into four stages and employed qualitative text analysis to examine the relationship between three characteristics of network structure (degree centrality, network density, and betweenness centrality) and the progress of each QI initiative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The progress of QI initiatives varied considerably among organizations. The transition between stages was influenced by all three network characteristics to varying degrees, depending on the stage. Project managers whose QI initiatives progressed to advanced stages of implementation had formed ad hoc clusters of colleagues passionate about the initiatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing QI initiatives appears to be facilitated by the formation of clusters of supportive individuals within organizations; this formation requires high betweenness centrality and high network density.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Flexibly modifying specific network characteristics depending on the stage of implementation may help project managers advance their QI initiatives, achieving more uniform results from QICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":" ","pages":"148-157"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139724484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
In the eye of the storm: Hospital leaders' resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic. 暴风眼中:医院领导在 COVID-19 大流行期间的应变能力。
IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-08 DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000399
Nina Füreder, Charlotte Förster

Background: Although hospital leaders were already at a high risk for psychological and physical illnesses long before the pandemic, the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated this situation.

Purpose: Recognizing the crucial role of leaders in organizational crises and building on the conservation of resources theory, our study examines how hospital leaders cope with difficulties that endure over an extended period of time. By using the COVID-19 pandemic as an example for prolonged adversity in hospitals, we provide insight into the different responses to a given adversity and further expand knowledge about the role of time in crisis and for resilience.

Methodology/approach: Qualitative expert interviews were conducted with 44 hospital leaders in Austria between December 2020 and November 2021. For data analysis, we used a hybrid approach, consisting of both deductive and inductive coding.

Results: By extending Bardoel and Drago's (2021) conceptual approach on acceptance and strategic resilience, our empirical study shows that during enduring adversity, hospital leaders use both types of resilience. The choice between them and their suitability depends on both the duration of exposure and severity of the adversity.

Conclusion: Our findings further show that when immediately confronted with adversity, leaders tend to rely on resource-preserving acceptance resilience, whereas when dealing with enduring adversity, leaders are more likely to use resilience-enhancing strategic resilience.

Practical implications: Even though leaders rely on both types of resilience, our findings also imply that if opportunities to build strategic resilience are limited, higher burnout and turnover rates might be the consequence.

背景:尽管早在大流行病发生之前,医院领导就已经处于心理和生理疾病的高风险之中,但 COVID-19 大流行病却加剧了这种状况:认识到领导者在组织危机中的关键作用,并以资源保护理论为基础,我们的研究探讨了医院领导者如何应对长期存在的困难。我们以 COVID-19 大流行病为例,探讨了医院在长期逆境中的不同应对方式,并进一步拓展了有关时间在危机中的作用以及抗灾能力的知识:在 2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 11 月期间,我们对奥地利的 44 位医院领导进行了定性专家访谈。在数据分析中,我们采用了混合方法,包括演绎和归纳编码:通过扩展 Bardoel 和 Drago(2021 年)关于接受和战略复原力的概念方法,我们的实证研究表明,在逆境中,医院领导者会同时使用两种复原力。它们之间的选择及其适用性取决于逆境的持续时间和严重程度:我们的研究结果进一步表明,在立即面对逆境时,领导者倾向于依赖资源保护型接受抗逆力,而在应对持久逆境时,领导者更倾向于使用抗逆力增强型战略抗逆力:尽管领导者同时依赖这两种抗逆力,但我们的研究结果也意味着,如果建立战略抗逆力的机会有限,那么后果可能是更高的职业倦怠率和离职率。
{"title":"In the eye of the storm: Hospital leaders' resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Nina Füreder, Charlotte Förster","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000399","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000399","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although hospital leaders were already at a high risk for psychological and physical illnesses long before the pandemic, the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated this situation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recognizing the crucial role of leaders in organizational crises and building on the conservation of resources theory, our study examines how hospital leaders cope with difficulties that endure over an extended period of time. By using the COVID-19 pandemic as an example for prolonged adversity in hospitals, we provide insight into the different responses to a given adversity and further expand knowledge about the role of time in crisis and for resilience.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>Qualitative expert interviews were conducted with 44 hospital leaders in Austria between December 2020 and November 2021. For data analysis, we used a hybrid approach, consisting of both deductive and inductive coding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By extending Bardoel and Drago's (2021) conceptual approach on acceptance and strategic resilience, our empirical study shows that during enduring adversity, hospital leaders use both types of resilience. The choice between them and their suitability depends on both the duration of exposure and severity of the adversity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings further show that when immediately confronted with adversity, leaders tend to rely on resource-preserving acceptance resilience, whereas when dealing with enduring adversity, leaders are more likely to use resilience-enhancing strategic resilience.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>Even though leaders rely on both types of resilience, our findings also imply that if opportunities to build strategic resilience are limited, higher burnout and turnover rates might be the consequence.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":"49 2","pages":"139-147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139940996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychological work climates and health care worker well-being. 心理工作氛围与医护人员的幸福感。
IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000401
Cheryl Rathert, Timothy Vogus, Larry R Hearld
{"title":"Psychological work climates and health care worker well-being.","authors":"Cheryl Rathert, Timothy Vogus, Larry R Hearld","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000401","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000401","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":"49 2","pages":"85"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139941026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pay practices and safety organizing: Evidence from hospital nursing units. 薪酬实践和安全组织:来自医院护理单位的证据。
IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000392
Samantha A Conroy, Timothy J Vogus

Background: Our understanding of how highly reliable care delivery is brought about remains elusive, in part, because there is limited evidence regarding the organizational practices that enable safety organizing-the behaviors and processes underlying high reliability.

Purpose: Because safety organizing relies on discretionary effort and lowering barriers to sharing expertise and discussing threats to safety and errors, we investigate three pay practices and their effects on information sharing and, in turn, safety organizing. Specifically, we examine average pay level, minimum pay rates, and pay dispersion on nursing units and their relationship with information sharing and safety organizing.

Method: Cross-sectional analyses of survey data from 1,461 registered nurses in 45 nursing units in three Midwestern hospitals on safety organizing linked to administrative data on pay practices from the organization's human resource systems. Pay data and survey responses were aggregated to the nursing unit level. PROCESS and structural equation modeling were used to simultaneously test for direct and indirect effects of pay variables on information sharing and safety organizing.

Results: PROCESS and Mplus path analysis indicated that paying a higher minimum rate in the unit and having lower pay dispersion have indirect, desirable associations with safety organizing through information sharing.

Conclusion: Pay practices can help organizations enhance safety organizing. In particular, higher pay rates for the lowest level nurses and lower pay dispersion among nurses are associated with unit-level information sharing and safety organizing.

Practice implications: Having pay practices associated with lower within-unit variation and higher pay for the lowest paid members of a unit may be viable strategies for greater information sharing and safety organizing.

背景:我们对高可靠的医疗服务是如何产生的理解仍然难以捉摸,部分原因是关于实现安全组织的组织实践的证据有限,即高可靠性背后的行为和过程。目的:由于安全组织依赖于自由裁量的努力和降低共享专业知识和讨论安全与错误威胁的障碍,我们调查了三种薪酬做法及其对信息共享和安全组织的影响。具体来说,我们研究了护理单位的平均工资水平、最低工资率和工资分散,以及它们与信息共享和安全组织的关系。方法:对中西部三家医院45个护理单位的1461名注册护士的安全组织调查数据进行横断面分析,调查数据与该组织人力资源系统中薪酬实践的行政数据有关。薪酬数据和调查反馈被汇总到护理单位水平。采用过程模型和结构方程模型同时检验了薪酬变量对信息共享和安全组织的直接和间接影响。结果:PROCESS和Mplus路径分析表明,在单位中支付较高的最低费率和较低的工资分散与通过信息共享进行安全组织有间接的、理想的关联。结论:薪酬实践有助于组织加强安全组织。特别是,最低级别护士的高工资率和护士之间的低工资分散与单位级信息共享和安全组织有关。实践意义:将薪酬实践与单位内较低的差异和单位内最低的成员较高的薪酬联系起来,可能是促进信息共享和安全组织的可行策略。
{"title":"Pay practices and safety organizing: Evidence from hospital nursing units.","authors":"Samantha A Conroy, Timothy J Vogus","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000392","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000392","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our understanding of how highly reliable care delivery is brought about remains elusive, in part, because there is limited evidence regarding the organizational practices that enable safety organizing-the behaviors and processes underlying high reliability.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Because safety organizing relies on discretionary effort and lowering barriers to sharing expertise and discussing threats to safety and errors, we investigate three pay practices and their effects on information sharing and, in turn, safety organizing. Specifically, we examine average pay level, minimum pay rates, and pay dispersion on nursing units and their relationship with information sharing and safety organizing.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional analyses of survey data from 1,461 registered nurses in 45 nursing units in three Midwestern hospitals on safety organizing linked to administrative data on pay practices from the organization's human resource systems. Pay data and survey responses were aggregated to the nursing unit level. PROCESS and structural equation modeling were used to simultaneously test for direct and indirect effects of pay variables on information sharing and safety organizing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PROCESS and Mplus path analysis indicated that paying a higher minimum rate in the unit and having lower pay dispersion have indirect, desirable associations with safety organizing through information sharing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pay practices can help organizations enhance safety organizing. In particular, higher pay rates for the lowest level nurses and lower pay dispersion among nurses are associated with unit-level information sharing and safety organizing.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Having pay practices associated with lower within-unit variation and higher pay for the lowest paid members of a unit may be viable strategies for greater information sharing and safety organizing.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":"49 1","pages":"68-73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138452830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
System justification theory as a foundation for understanding relations among toxic health care workplaces, bullying, and psychological safety. 系统辩护理论是理解有毒卫生保健工作场所、欺凌和心理安全之间关系的基础。
IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000391
Tracy H Porter, Cheryl Rathert, Ghadir Ishqaidef, Derick R Simmons

Background: Toxic work environments and bullying are rampant in health care organizations. The Joint Commission asserted that bullying is a threat to patient safety, and furthermore, it implied that bullying affects clinician psychological safety. However, after decades of trying to reduce bullying, it persists.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine if system justification (SJ) theory can help explain the persistence of bullying in health care organizations. SJ theory posits that people are motivated to justify the systems with which they are embedded, even if those systems are dysfunctional or unfair.

Method: A cross-sectional survey of health care workers ( n = 302) was used to test a moderated mediation model to examine relations between instrumental work climate perceptions and psychological safety, as mediated by SJ and moderated by experiences of workplace bullying.

Results: Analysis revealed that SJ fully mediated negative relations between instrumental climate and psychological safety; because of SJ the instrumental climate no longer had a direct negative association with psychological safety. Furthermore, bullying was found to play a moderating role in the instrumental climate-SJ relationship.

Conclusion: This study found some support for the role of SJ in perpetuating instrumental workplaces and workplace bullying in health care.

Practice implications: Some scholars have proposed that a focus on disrupting workplace contexts that trigger SJ in workers could help break patterns of behavior that enable toxic work environments and bullying to persist.

背景:在医疗机构中,有毒的工作环境和欺凌行为十分猖獗。联合委员会断言,欺凌是对患者安全的威胁,此外,它暗示欺凌影响临床医生的心理安全。然而,经过几十年的努力减少欺凌,它仍然存在。目的:本研究的目的是确定系统辩护(SJ)理论是否有助于解释医疗机构中持续存在的欺凌行为。SJ理论认为,人们有动机为他们所处的制度辩护,即使这些制度功能失调或不公平。方法:对302名卫生保健工作者进行横断面调查,检验一个有调节的中介模型,以检验工具性工作气候感知与心理安全之间的关系,该关系由SJ介导,并由工作场所欺凌经历调节。结果:SJ完全介导工具气候与心理安全之间的负向关系;由于SJ的存在,工具气候不再与心理安全有直接的负相关。此外,霸凌行为在工具性气候- sj关系中起调节作用。结论:本研究发现了SJ在医疗保健中维持工具性工作场所和工作场所欺凌中的作用。实践启示:一些学者提出,关注破坏触发员工SJ的工作环境,可以帮助打破导致有毒工作环境和欺凌持续存在的行为模式。
{"title":"System justification theory as a foundation for understanding relations among toxic health care workplaces, bullying, and psychological safety.","authors":"Tracy H Porter, Cheryl Rathert, Ghadir Ishqaidef, Derick R Simmons","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000391","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000391","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Toxic work environments and bullying are rampant in health care organizations. The Joint Commission asserted that bullying is a threat to patient safety, and furthermore, it implied that bullying affects clinician psychological safety. However, after decades of trying to reduce bullying, it persists.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine if system justification (SJ) theory can help explain the persistence of bullying in health care organizations. SJ theory posits that people are motivated to justify the systems with which they are embedded, even if those systems are dysfunctional or unfair.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of health care workers ( n = 302) was used to test a moderated mediation model to examine relations between instrumental work climate perceptions and psychological safety, as mediated by SJ and moderated by experiences of workplace bullying.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis revealed that SJ fully mediated negative relations between instrumental climate and psychological safety; because of SJ the instrumental climate no longer had a direct negative association with psychological safety. Furthermore, bullying was found to play a moderating role in the instrumental climate-SJ relationship.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found some support for the role of SJ in perpetuating instrumental workplaces and workplace bullying in health care.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Some scholars have proposed that a focus on disrupting workplace contexts that trigger SJ in workers could help break patterns of behavior that enable toxic work environments and bullying to persist.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":"49 1","pages":"59-67"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138452832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Health Care Management Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1