ABSTRACT This essay argues that to assess the likelihood that incumbent firms will successfully make the required transformations to their strategy and operations in the face of technological transformations, it is not sufficient to investigate their dynamic capabilities. Whether an incumbent is likely to succeed in its effort to change itself via dynamic capabilities depends also on how quickly start-ups or diversifying entrants can build ordinary capabilities to offer the new technology at scale. We offer a framework to assess dynamic competition that integrates both ordinary and dynamic capabilities into the analysis by systematically comparing incumbents, start-ups, and diversifying entrants. We illustrate the framework with a case study of electric vehicles and aim to show how crucial such comparative analyses are for making well-founded predictions about the likelihood that incumbents will be able to maintain their leadership positions in the future.
{"title":"A Capabilities Framework for Dynamic Competition: Assessing the Relative Chances of Incumbents, Start-Ups, and Diversifying Entrants","authors":"J. Murmann, Fabian Vogt","doi":"10.1017/mor.2022.37","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2022.37","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This essay argues that to assess the likelihood that incumbent firms will successfully make the required transformations to their strategy and operations in the face of technological transformations, it is not sufficient to investigate their dynamic capabilities. Whether an incumbent is likely to succeed in its effort to change itself via dynamic capabilities depends also on how quickly start-ups or diversifying entrants can build ordinary capabilities to offer the new technology at scale. We offer a framework to assess dynamic competition that integrates both ordinary and dynamic capabilities into the analysis by systematically comparing incumbents, start-ups, and diversifying entrants. We illustrate the framework with a case study of electric vehicles and aim to show how crucial such comparative analyses are for making well-founded predictions about the likelihood that incumbents will be able to maintain their leadership positions in the future.","PeriodicalId":47798,"journal":{"name":"Management and Organization Review","volume":"19 1","pages":"141 - 156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45497989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Miikka J. Lehtonen, A. Koveshnikov, Heidi Wechtler
ABSTRACT In this study, we conceptualize the thus far little explored relationship between expatriate and host country as a form of social exchange governed by the norm of reciprocity. Drawing from social exchange theory and our analysis of 451 self-initiated expatriates (SIEs) living and working in the United Arab Emirates, we examine whether the degree of SIEs’ career and community embeddedness explains their host country withdrawal intention via enhanced perceived institutional trust and a more tolerant attitude toward workplace discrimination. Our results provide general support for our theoretical model and most of our hypotheses. In this way, our article makes three contributions. First, it suggests a novel way to conceptualize the relationship between SIEs and host country as a form of social exchange. Second, it differentiates between two dimensions of embeddedness and explicates how the two contribute to SIEs’ intentions to stay in the host country. Finally, the analysis theorizes and empirically tests two previously little explored mechanisms of enhanced institutional trust and a more tolerant attitude toward workplace discrimination through which SIEs’ host country embeddedness influences their host country withdrawal intentions. 在本研究中，我们论述为什么驻外人员和东道国之间存在一种以回报为原则的社会交换关系。我们基于社会交换理论，假设驻外人员在职场和社区的嵌入程度可以解释他们从东道国的撤离意向，因为嵌入程度越高，越可能增进他们对当地体制的信任以及对职场歧视的容忍。我们对451位自愿从国外来到阿拉伯联合酋长国居住和生活的人员进行了调查和分析，结果支持了以上假设。
{"title":"Expatriates’ Embeddedness and Host Country Withdrawal Intention: A Social Exchange Perspective","authors":"Miikka J. Lehtonen, A. Koveshnikov, Heidi Wechtler","doi":"10.1017/mor.2022.48","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2022.48","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this study, we conceptualize the thus far little explored relationship between expatriate and host country as a form of social exchange governed by the norm of reciprocity. Drawing from social exchange theory and our analysis of 451 self-initiated expatriates (SIEs) living and working in the United Arab Emirates, we examine whether the degree of SIEs’ career and community embeddedness explains their host country withdrawal intention via enhanced perceived institutional trust and a more tolerant attitude toward workplace discrimination. Our results provide general support for our theoretical model and most of our hypotheses. In this way, our article makes three contributions. First, it suggests a novel way to conceptualize the relationship between SIEs and host country as a form of social exchange. Second, it differentiates between two dimensions of embeddedness and explicates how the two contribute to SIEs’ intentions to stay in the host country. Finally, the analysis theorizes and empirically tests two previously little explored mechanisms of enhanced institutional trust and a more tolerant attitude toward workplace discrimination through which SIEs’ host country embeddedness influences their host country withdrawal intentions. 在本研究中，我们论述为什么驻外人员和东道国之间存在一种以回报为原则的社会交换关系。我们基于社会交换理论，假设驻外人员在职场和社区的嵌入程度可以解释他们从东道国的撤离意向，因为嵌入程度越高，越可能增进他们对当地体制的信任以及对职场歧视的容忍。我们对451位自愿从国外来到阿拉伯联合酋长国居住和生活的人员进行了调查和分析，结果支持了以上假设。","PeriodicalId":47798,"journal":{"name":"Management and Organization Review","volume":"19 1","pages":"655 - 684"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48824863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Antonia Madrid‐Guijarro, Ana Carolina Garcés-Torres
ABSTRACT Open innovation (OI) has been appointed as a key factor to promote innovative performance, but some research gaps remain especially when it comes to SMEs in developing countries. This article deals with (1) the effect of formalization of innovation strategy on OI activities in SMEs, (2) the impact of OI activities on SMEs’ innovative performance, and (3) the moderating role played by control on the relationship between inbound and outbound activities and the innovative performance. OI encompasses a range of innovative methods and procedures in firms to stimulate internal innovation and widen the external use of innovation (inbound and outbound). In this work, an empirical study is carried out on 543 Ecuadorian SMEs. The results show that the formalization of the innovation strategy promotes OI activities, both inbound and outbound. While outbound activities carried out by SMEs enhance innovative performance, this positive effect is only identified for inbound open innovation activities when control exists and increases, acting this variable as a moderating factor. These results have important implications both for the management of companies and the development of public policies aimed at promoting OI in SMEs in developing countries. This research contributes to the literature as it deals with a developing country context and considers a wide range of OI activities. 摘要 虽然开放式创新被认为是提升企业创新绩效的关键因素，但很少有研究关注它对于发展中国家中小企业的影响。本文研究三个问题：（1）正式制定创新战略对中小企业开放式创新活动的效应，（2）开放式创新活动对于中小企业创新绩效的影响，（3）企业管控对于开放式创新活动与创新绩效的调节作用。开放式创新包含一系列的创新方法和程序，用以刺激企业内部创新和扩大的创新的外在使用。本文作者对厄瓜多尔的543家中小企业进行了实证研究。结果表明，正式制定创新战略对企业开放式创新活动（无论内外）都有积极影响。此外，企业的对创新的外在使用总是能促进其创新绩效，但内部开放式创新活动却只有在内部管控机制存在或增加的情景中才对企业的创新绩效有正面影响。
{"title":"Open Innovation in Ecuadorian SMEs: The Importance of Strategy and the Moderating Effect of Control","authors":"Antonia Madrid‐Guijarro, Ana Carolina Garcés-Torres","doi":"10.1017/mor.2022.28","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2022.28","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Open innovation (OI) has been appointed as a key factor to promote innovative performance, but some research gaps remain especially when it comes to SMEs in developing countries. This article deals with (1) the effect of formalization of innovation strategy on OI activities in SMEs, (2) the impact of OI activities on SMEs’ innovative performance, and (3) the moderating role played by control on the relationship between inbound and outbound activities and the innovative performance. OI encompasses a range of innovative methods and procedures in firms to stimulate internal innovation and widen the external use of innovation (inbound and outbound). In this work, an empirical study is carried out on 543 Ecuadorian SMEs. The results show that the formalization of the innovation strategy promotes OI activities, both inbound and outbound. While outbound activities carried out by SMEs enhance innovative performance, this positive effect is only identified for inbound open innovation activities when control exists and increases, acting this variable as a moderating factor. These results have important implications both for the management of companies and the development of public policies aimed at promoting OI in SMEs in developing countries. This research contributes to the literature as it deals with a developing country context and considers a wide range of OI activities. 摘要 虽然开放式创新被认为是提升企业创新绩效的关键因素，但很少有研究关注它对于发展中国家中小企业的影响。本文研究三个问题：（1）正式制定创新战略对中小企业开放式创新活动的效应，（2）开放式创新活动对于中小企业创新绩效的影响，（3）企业管控对于开放式创新活动与创新绩效的调节作用。开放式创新包含一系列的创新方法和程序，用以刺激企业内部创新和扩大的创新的外在使用。本文作者对厄瓜多尔的543家中小企业进行了实证研究。结果表明，正式制定创新战略对企业开放式创新活动（无论内外）都有积极影响。此外，企业的对创新的外在使用总是能促进其创新绩效，但内部开放式创新活动却只有在内部管控机制存在或增加的情景中才对企业的创新绩效有正面影响。","PeriodicalId":47798,"journal":{"name":"Management and Organization Review","volume":"19 1","pages":"533 - 566"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49026030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRACT This is a follow-up discussion about the Chinese electric vehicle (EV) sector, in particular the relative prospects of traditional automotive manufacturers and new ‘species’, four years after our last conversation on this topic (Jiang & Lu, 2018). It is also a response to Murmann and Vogt's (2022) latest article, which goes beyond Teece's (2019) focus on dynamic capabilities and constructs a systematic framework of firm capabilities to understand the competitive dynamics during a transformational shift of products.
{"title":"New Industry Paradigms May Overwhelm Dynamic Capabilities: Different Competitive Dynamics Around Tesla and Chinese EV Start-Ups","authors":"Hong Jiang, Feng Lu","doi":"10.1017/mor.2022.38","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2022.38","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This is a follow-up discussion about the Chinese electric vehicle (EV) sector, in particular the relative prospects of traditional automotive manufacturers and new ‘species’, four years after our last conversation on this topic (Jiang & Lu, 2018). It is also a response to Murmann and Vogt's (2022) latest article, which goes beyond Teece's (2019) focus on dynamic capabilities and constructs a systematic framework of firm capabilities to understand the competitive dynamics during a transformational shift of products.","PeriodicalId":47798,"journal":{"name":"Management and Organization Review","volume":"19 1","pages":"157 - 169"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41546737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRACT Built upon the mixed gamble perspective, we used a recent survey on Chinese family firms (FFs) and found that increased family influence lowers Chinese FF environmental proactiveness, as they show a peculiar tendency to take a financial view rather than a socioemotional wealth view. Moreover, we found that increased resource endowment attenuates this tendency, whereas provincial marketization strengthens it. However, entrepreneur reputation does not have a significant moderating effect. Overall, the study enriches an understanding of environmental proactiveness for FFs, organizational heterogeneity, and institutional differences. It also introduces new elements into the mixed gamble framework. 摘要 基于混合博弈模型的理论视角，我们通过对一份最新的中国家族企业调查问卷进行分析，发现这些家族企业普遍倾向于更关注金钱财富而非社会情感财富，因而随着家族影响力的增加，其企业的环保积极性反而降低。此外，我们也发现企业资源禀赋的增加会削弱上述关系，而省级市场化程度会加强上述关系。但是，企业主的个人声誉不显著影响上述关系。综合来看，本研究丰富了家族企业环保积极性的研究，强调了组织的异质性及制度环境的差异性，同时为混合博弈模型注入了新的理论要素。
ABSTRACT Build up on the mixed diamond perspective, we used a recent survey on Chinese family firms (FFs) and found that increased family influence lower Chinese FF environmental protection, as they showed a specialist margin to take a financial view more than a social emotional wealth view More than, we found that increased resource allowance attention to this tense, where as provincial marketing strengths it. However, the introduction does not have a significant modeling effect Overall, the study enriches an understanding of environmental protection for FFs, organizational heterogeneity, and institutional differences It also introduces new elements into the mixed Gamble framework Based on the theoretical perspective of a mixed game model, we analyzed a recent survey questionnaire of Chinese family businesses and found that these family businesses generally tend to pay more attention to financial wealth rather than social emotional wealth. Therefore, as the influence of the family increases, their environmental enthusiasm decreases. In addition, we also found that an increase in enterprise resource endowment weakens the above relationship, while the degree of provincial-level marketization strengthens the above relationship. However, the personal reputation of the business owner does not significantly affect the above relationship. Overall, this study enriches the research on the environmental enthusiasm of family businesses, emphasizing the heterogeneity of organizations and differences in institutional environments, while injecting new theoretical elements into the mixed game model.
{"title":"Family Influence and Environmental Proactiveness of Family Firms in China: A Mixed Gamble Perspective","authors":"B. Liu, Gongming Qian, K. Au","doi":"10.1017/mor.2022.21","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2022.21","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Built upon the mixed gamble perspective, we used a recent survey on Chinese family firms (FFs) and found that increased family influence lowers Chinese FF environmental proactiveness, as they show a peculiar tendency to take a financial view rather than a socioemotional wealth view. Moreover, we found that increased resource endowment attenuates this tendency, whereas provincial marketization strengthens it. However, entrepreneur reputation does not have a significant moderating effect. Overall, the study enriches an understanding of environmental proactiveness for FFs, organizational heterogeneity, and institutional differences. It also introduces new elements into the mixed gamble framework. 摘要 基于混合博弈模型的理论视角，我们通过对一份最新的中国家族企业调查问卷进行分析，发现这些家族企业普遍倾向于更关注金钱财富而非社会情感财富，因而随着家族影响力的增加，其企业的环保积极性反而降低。此外，我们也发现企业资源禀赋的增加会削弱上述关系，而省级市场化程度会加强上述关系。但是，企业主的个人声誉不显著影响上述关系。综合来看，本研究丰富了家族企业环保积极性的研究，强调了组织的异质性及制度环境的差异性，同时为混合博弈模型注入了新的理论要素。","PeriodicalId":47798,"journal":{"name":"Management and Organization Review","volume":"19 1","pages":"348 - 371"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44870019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. Ghorbani, Zhenzhen Xie, Jun-Na Jin, Fengbin Wang
ABSTRACT Through two in-depth case studies, we compare the approaches of a state-owned enterprise (SOE), Beijing Automotive Industries Holding Co., and a privately owned enterprise (POE), Geely, to acquire and absorb advanced technological knowledge to enhance their innovation capabilities. Each company acquired advanced knowledge from troubled famous Swedish automakers and upgraded their products technologically. Analyzing data mainly collected from secondary sources identifies major differences in approaches and actions at each acquisition step rooted in the type of ownership. We juxtapose these differences with insights from the literature on knowledge acquisition and research on firm ownership. Our findings show that the POE seeks the strategic goal of synergistic technology integration for better innovation and economic performance. In contrast, the SOE pursues national objectives with less regard for market success. This SOE focuses on an independent approach to knowledge absorption and development during their acquisition, whereas the POE emphasizes collaboration in innovation capacity development. This study provides insights into Chinese firms’ positioning on innovation development on the global stage, comparative capitalism, and the particular case of state capitalism in China. 摘要 本文通过对两个案例的深入比较研究，对比了国有企业北汽和民营企业吉利获取和吸收先进技术知识以增强创新能力的策略。这两家公司都从陷入困境的知名瑞典汽车制造商那里获取了先进知识，消化吸收促进其产品的技术升级，因此有相当的可比性。本研究以二手数据为主，从知识获取以及企业所有制两个视角对案例进行分析。作者发现两家企业在知识获取的每一个环节都采取了不同的策略和行动，而这些不同根植于两家企业的所有制差异。研究结果表明，私营企业的策略遵循技术集成以期获得更佳的创新和经济绩效的战略目标，而国企更侧重国家目标、较少考虑市场成功。此外，该国有企业在收购过程中注重知识吸收和开发过程中的独立自主，而私营企业则强调合作提升创新能力。本研究为有关中国企业国际化过程中的创新发展、制度比较研究，特别是中国的国有企业研究提供了新见解和新发现。
ABSTRACT Through two in depth case studies, we compare the approvals of a state owned enterprise (SOE), Beijing Automotive Industries Holding Co., and a privately owned enterprise (POE), Geely, to acquire and enhance their innovation capabilities Each company acquired advanced knowledge from troublesome Swedish automakers and upgraded their products technically Analyzing data mainly collected from secondary sources identifying major differences in approvals and actions at each acquisition step rooted in the type of ownership We juxtapose these differences with insights from the quality on knowledge acquisition and research on firm ownership Our findings show that the POE seeks the strategic goal of synergistic technology integration for better innovation and economic performance In contrast, the SOE purchases national objectives with less regard for market success This SOE focuses on an independent approach to knowledge absorption and development during their acquisition, where as the POE emphasizes collaboration in innovation capacity development This study provides insights into Chinese firms'positioning on innovation development on the global stage, comparative capital, and the specific case of state capital in China Abstract: This article compares the strategies of state-owned enterprise BAIC and private enterprise Geely in acquiring and absorbing advanced technological knowledge to enhance innovation capabilities through in-depth comparative research on two cases. Both companies have obtained advanced knowledge from well-known Swedish automakers in distress, digested and absorbed it to promote the technological upgrading of their products, thus having considerable comparability. This study focuses on second-hand data and analyzes the case from the perspectives of knowledge acquisition and enterprise ownership. The author found that the two companies have adopted different strategies and actions in every aspect of knowledge acquisition, and these differences are rooted in the ownership differences between the two companies. The research results indicate that private enterprises follow the strategic goal of technology integration to achieve better innovation and economic performance, while state-owned enterprises focus more on national goals and less on market success. In addition, the state-owned enterprise emphasizes knowledge absorption and independence in the development process during the acquisition process, while the private enterprise emphasizes cooperation to enhance innovation capabilities. This study provides new insights and findings for the study of innovative development and institutional comparison in the internationalization process of Chinese enterprises, especially for the study of state-owned enterprises in China.
{"title":"Chinese Firms’ Acquisition of Innovation Capability from Overseas: Approaches by State- versus Private-Owned Firms","authors":"M. Ghorbani, Zhenzhen Xie, Jun-Na Jin, Fengbin Wang","doi":"10.1017/mor.2022.26","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2022.26","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Through two in-depth case studies, we compare the approaches of a state-owned enterprise (SOE), Beijing Automotive Industries Holding Co., and a privately owned enterprise (POE), Geely, to acquire and absorb advanced technological knowledge to enhance their innovation capabilities. Each company acquired advanced knowledge from troubled famous Swedish automakers and upgraded their products technologically. Analyzing data mainly collected from secondary sources identifies major differences in approaches and actions at each acquisition step rooted in the type of ownership. We juxtapose these differences with insights from the literature on knowledge acquisition and research on firm ownership. Our findings show that the POE seeks the strategic goal of synergistic technology integration for better innovation and economic performance. In contrast, the SOE pursues national objectives with less regard for market success. This SOE focuses on an independent approach to knowledge absorption and development during their acquisition, whereas the POE emphasizes collaboration in innovation capacity development. This study provides insights into Chinese firms’ positioning on innovation development on the global stage, comparative capitalism, and the particular case of state capitalism in China. 摘要 本文通过对两个案例的深入比较研究，对比了国有企业北汽和民营企业吉利获取和吸收先进技术知识以增强创新能力的策略。这两家公司都从陷入困境的知名瑞典汽车制造商那里获取了先进知识，消化吸收促进其产品的技术升级，因此有相当的可比性。本研究以二手数据为主，从知识获取以及企业所有制两个视角对案例进行分析。作者发现两家企业在知识获取的每一个环节都采取了不同的策略和行动，而这些不同根植于两家企业的所有制差异。研究结果表明，私营企业的策略遵循技术集成以期获得更佳的创新和经济绩效的战略目标，而国企更侧重国家目标、较少考虑市场成功。此外，该国有企业在收购过程中注重知识吸收和开发过程中的独立自主，而私营企业则强调合作提升创新能力。本研究为有关中国企业国际化过程中的创新发展、制度比较研究，特别是中国的国有企业研究提供了新见解和新发现。","PeriodicalId":47798,"journal":{"name":"Management and Organization Review","volume":"19 1","pages":"233 - 255"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43246102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"De-Linking From Western Epistemologies: Using Guanxi-Type Relationships to Attract and Retain Hotel Guests in the Middle East – ERRATUM","authors":"Ahmed Shaalan, Riyad Eid, M. Tourky","doi":"10.1017/mor.2021.57","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2021.57","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47798,"journal":{"name":"Management and Organization Review","volume":"18 1","pages":"1243 - 1243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43400482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRACT The ‘rivalry’ between India and China on the global stage is much ado about nothing. India and China both have huge potential to play a bigger role in global business than they do today. Both countries have experienced major growth domestically, which is not yet matched by their role in global business. MNEs from the two countries have been internationalizing along very different pathways, with few overlaps. Their ability to realize their potential depends on policies and institutions as well as entrepreneurial business leadership in their own country. Their future internationalization depends only to a small degree on the other of the two countries
{"title":"India and China: Distinct Paths to Global Businesses","authors":"K. Meyer","doi":"10.1017/mor.2022.25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2022.25","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The ‘rivalry’ between India and China on the global stage is much ado about nothing. India and China both have huge potential to play a bigger role in global business than they do today. Both countries have experienced major growth domestically, which is not yet matched by their role in global business. MNEs from the two countries have been internationalizing along very different pathways, with few overlaps. Their ability to realize their potential depends on policies and institutions as well as entrepreneurial business leadership in their own country. Their future internationalization depends only to a small degree on the other of the two countries","PeriodicalId":47798,"journal":{"name":"Management and Organization Review","volume":"18 1","pages":"1235 - 1241"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47033454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRACT In a recent paper, Carl Fey (2022) ponders the future development of Chinese business schools. He observes that the American model of business education – the target of emulation for most Chinese business schools up to this point – shows signs of serious inadequacy. It is high time, Fey argues, that Chinese business schools come up with ‘indigenous’ models of business education that better serve the needs of China's social and economical development. The paper then sketches a framework featuring some fundamental aspects of such indigenous models. We find Fey's central argument and framework both timely and inspiring. In what follows, we draw on what is happening at the School of Management of Zhejiang University (‘the School’) to respond to, and dialogue with, some of Fey's ideas.
{"title":"Introducing ‘Business Plus Education Ecosystem’ as a Commentary to Fey (2022)","authors":"Jiang Wei, Zhongyuan Zhang","doi":"10.1017/mor.2022.24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2022.24","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In a recent paper, Carl Fey (2022) ponders the future development of Chinese business schools. He observes that the American model of business education – the target of emulation for most Chinese business schools up to this point – shows signs of serious inadequacy. It is high time, Fey argues, that Chinese business schools come up with ‘indigenous’ models of business education that better serve the needs of China's social and economical development. The paper then sketches a framework featuring some fundamental aspects of such indigenous models. We find Fey's central argument and framework both timely and inspiring. In what follows, we draw on what is happening at the School of Management of Zhejiang University (‘the School’) to respond to, and dialogue with, some of Fey's ideas.","PeriodicalId":47798,"journal":{"name":"Management and Organization Review","volume":"18 1","pages":"1000 - 1005"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49269662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：