Palliative & Supportive Care最新文献

Objectives: Behavioral health needs are highly prevalent among individuals receiving long-term services and supports (LTSS), yet palliative care (PC) models in these settings often underemphasize psychiatric symptom management. This study explores interdisciplinary staff perspectives on behavioral health as a core domain of PC across nursing home and Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) sites.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a multi-site survey assessing PC needs across 13 LTSS sites within a large health system in New York State. We examined 5 survey items related to psychiatric symptom management, analyzing frequency, comfort, perceived benefit, and training interest. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations between staff characteristics and behavioral health-related outcomes.

Results: Among 597 respondents, 60.5% reported that over half of their patients could benefit from psychiatric symptom management, and nearly half (49.2%) reported managing such symptoms weekly or more. Forty percent identified psychiatric symptom management as one of the top three ways PC specialists could help their patients, and 44.6% expressed interest in further behavioral health training as part of further PC training. Prior professional experience with PC was associated with greater recognition of behavioral health needs among patients (aOR 1.6), greater likelihood of managing psychiatric symptoms (aOR 2.0), and greater comfort doing so (aOR 1.5).

Significance of results: Behavioral health emerged as a salient and frequently encountered domain of serious illness care among LTSS staff, particularly in nursing home and PACE settings. Staff with prior PC experience were more engaged and confident in addressing psychiatric symptoms. Findings underscore the need for PC models in LTSS to better integrate behavioral health - through training, interdisciplinary collaboration, and care delivery redesign - to meet the complex needs of medically and psychiatrically vulnerable populations.

Objectives: Despite the increasing implementation of consultation-based hospice palliative care teams in tertiary hospitals of Korea, there is limited research on their impact on self-determination respect rates. Understanding this impact is crucial for improving end-of-life care practices and respecting patient autonomy. The aim of this study is to assess the trends in self-determination respect rates regarding advance care planning before and after the introduction of a consultation-based hospice palliative care team in a tertiary hospital.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using medical records from a tertiary hospital in Korea from March 2018 to December 2023. The study included all patients aged 19 years and older with medical records at a tertiary hospital during the specified period. We examined the characteristics of patients referred to the palliative care team, the effects of the consultation-based hospice palliative care team on the completion rates of advanced care planning, and changes in self-determination respect rates.

Results: Following the introduction of the consultation-based hospice palliative care team, 411 patients were referred. The proportion of patients with completed advance care planning increased from 27.0% to 60.6% (p < 0.001). The overall number of advanced care planning completions and the self-determination respect rate also showed a marked increase, particularly from 2021 to 2022, when the respect rate spiked from 27.6% to 43.2%.

Significance of results: Introduction of a consultation-based hospice palliative care team improved the respect for patient self-determination in end-of-life care decisions. These findings support the integration of hospice care teams in tertiary hospitals to enhance early and informed end-of-life decision-making.

Objectives: Palliative care enhances life, but rural Australia faces significant inequities, and psychosocial distress, an important yet often overlooked aspect, is under-recognized in these settings. This study examines how psychosocial distress evolves in rural palliative patients using the Death and Dying Distress Scale (DADDS).

Methods: A longitudinal study was conducted with palliative care patients in rural hospitals on Australia's east coast. Distress levels were measured using DADDS at multiple timepoints. Mixed-effects models assessed distress trajectories, while survival analyses (Weibull model) examined whether average distress changes predicted survival duration. For comparability, DADDS scores in mixed-effects models were standardized (0-100%), whereas survival analyses used raw total score changes.

Results: Adjusted mean total DADDS was 37.14 ± 22.67, with highest distress in fear of suffering and pain (49.95 ± 26.56) and lowest in fear of sudden death (30.26 ± 30.24). Distress followed a U-shaped trajectory: peaking early (52.68), declining mid (29.85) and late stages (28.26), then rising near death (53.05) (EMMs). Statistically significant changes included declines from early to mid-stage (β = -22.84, p = 0.007) and increases from late to near-death (β = 24.79, p = 0.003). Distress increased most from late to near-death in fear of suffering and death (β = 27.38, p = 0.006) and declined most from early to mid-stage in fear of dying (β = 28.01, p = 0.007). Higher distress correlated with shorter survival; each one-point increase in distress linked to a 6.97% survival reduction (time ratio = 0.930, β = -0.070, p < 0.001).

Significance of results: Psychosocial distress peaks in early palliative care and near death and is associated with reduced survival. Support should prioritize fears of suffering and pain during these stages, address fear of the dying process earlier, and remain attentive to persistent concerns such as loss of time and opportunity.

Objectives: The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and patient-reported digital tools (ePROMs and ePREMs) in palliative care offers new opportunities for personalised care yet also raises profound ethical and philosophical concerns. This paper examines how emerging technologies intersect with the concept of human dignity at the end of life, proposing an expanded notion of post-biographical dignity.

Methods: Ethical-philosophical analysis based on critical readings of AI ethics, narrative medicine, and the philosophy of technology.

Results: While digital tools such as ePROMs and ePREMs offer potential for richer, more person-centred care, they also risk reducing patients to data points and predictive profiles. Digital processes increasingly shape the narrative, vulnerability, and memory of the dying person. Post-biographical dignity calls for a reconceptualization of care that includes memory, relational continuity, and ethical engagement with digital remains.

Significance of results: End-of-life care in the age of AI must move beyond autonomy-focused ethics to encompass the narrative, relational, and posthumous dimensions of dignity. A critical, philosophically informed ethics is essential to prevent depersonalisation in digitally mediated care.