Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000977
Denise Kingi-Ulu'ave, Chris Framptom, Tania Cargo, Karolina Stasiak, Sarah Hetrick
Background: While Gatekeeper Training (GKT) is an accepted component of suicide prevention strategies, there is little evidence about its effectiveness with Indigenous populations and online. Aims: This study examined the effects of LifeKeepers, a novel GKT, comprising three modalities: General, e-learning, and a culturally tailored Māori (New Zealand Indigenous) training. Methods: A total of 5,981 participants completed measures of declarative knowledge, perceived knowledge, and self-efficacy pre- and post-training. Participants rated satisfaction with LifeKeepers, its safety considerations and cultural acceptability post-training. Results: There were statistically significant improvements across all outcome measures (declarative knowledge 1.3 [95% CI 1.3-1.4], perceived knowledge 10.9 [95% CI 10.7-11.1], and self-efficacy 2.5 [95% CI 2.5-2.6]), including across all modalities. More than 90% of participants rated satisfaction, cultural acceptability, and safety considerations highly. Limitations: Without a control group, changes may not be solely due to engagement in LifeKeepers. Conclusions: This study offers preliminary evidence of the immediate effectiveness of LifeKeepers, across its in-person, Indigenous Māori, and e-learning modalities. It addresses a critical literature gap by exploring participants' safety perspectives and strongly supports LifeKeepers as a primary suicide prevention intervention in New Zealand, especially for Indigenous Māori communities. Comparable outcomes for e-learning participants indicate wider accessibility, bolstering suicide prevention efforts.
背景:虽然守门人培训(GKT)是自杀预防策略中一个公认的组成部分,但有关其对土著居民和网络的有效性的证据却很少。目的:本研究考察了 LifeKeepers 的效果:一般培训、电子学习培训和针对毛利人(新西兰土著)文化的培训。培训方法共有 5981 名参与者在培训前后完成了陈述性知识、感知知识和自我效能的测量。参与者在培训后对 LifeKeepers 的满意度、安全考虑因素和文化可接受性进行评分。结果:所有结果指标均有统计学意义上的明显改善(陈述性知识 1.3 [95% CI 1.3-1.4],感知性知识 10.9 [95% CI 10.7-11.1],自我效能 2.5 [95% CI 2.5-2.6]),包括所有模式。超过 90% 的参与者对满意度、文化可接受性和安全性给予了高度评价。局限性:由于没有对照组,因此改变可能不完全是参与 LifeKeepers 所带来的。结论:本研究初步证明了 LifeKeepers 的即时有效性,包括面对面学习、土著毛利人学习和电子学习模式。该研究通过探索参与者的安全视角,填补了文献空白,并有力地支持将 "生命守护者 "作为新西兰预防自杀的主要干预措施,尤其是针对土著毛利社区。电子学习参与者的可比结果表明,电子学习具有更广泛的可及性,有助于自杀预防工作。
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact and Cultural Relevance of LifeKeepers Gatekeeper Training Across Three Training Modalities.","authors":"Denise Kingi-Ulu'ave, Chris Framptom, Tania Cargo, Karolina Stasiak, Sarah Hetrick","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000977","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000977","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>: While Gatekeeper Training (GKT) is an accepted component of suicide prevention strategies, there is little evidence about its effectiveness with Indigenous populations and online. <i>Aims</i>: This study examined the effects of LifeKeepers, a novel GKT, comprising three modalities: General, e-learning, and a culturally tailored Māori (New Zealand Indigenous) training. <i>Methods</i>: A total of 5,981 participants completed measures of declarative knowledge, perceived knowledge, and self-efficacy pre- and post-training. Participants rated satisfaction with LifeKeepers, its safety considerations and cultural acceptability post-training. <i>Results</i>: There were statistically significant improvements across all outcome measures (declarative knowledge 1.3 [95% CI 1.3-1.4], perceived knowledge 10.9 [95% CI 10.7-11.1], and self-efficacy 2.5 [95% CI 2.5-2.6]), including across all modalities. More than 90% of participants rated satisfaction, cultural acceptability, and safety considerations highly. <i>Limitations:</i> Without a control group, changes may not be solely due to engagement in LifeKeepers. <i>Conclusions</i>: This study offers preliminary evidence of the immediate effectiveness of LifeKeepers, across its in-person, Indigenous Māori, and e-learning modalities. It addresses a critical literature gap by exploring participants' safety perspectives and strongly supports LifeKeepers as a primary suicide prevention intervention in New Zealand, especially for Indigenous Māori communities. Comparable outcomes for e-learning participants indicate wider accessibility, bolstering suicide prevention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":"45 6","pages":"417-424"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142639165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-10-09DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000973
Steven Stack, David Lester
Aims: While there is substantial literature on gender and research productivity, bearing mixed results, no study is available for suicidology. The present investigation fills this gap and focuses on an influential elite. Methods: Data are taken from the Web of Science (WoS). They refer to the most prolific suicidologists (N = 116) with 70 or more works on the subject of suicide cited in WoS. Measures of research productivity include the number of works on suicide, citations to these works, and the h-index. The link between gender and the measures of research productivity is adjusted for years of experience, membership in a local research cluster, and region of the world. Results: Adjusting for the other predictors, males had more publications than females. However, gender did not predict either measure of quality of research (citations, h-index). Years of experience, as well as membership in a research cluster, predicted research productivity in most analyses. Region was unrelated to research productivity. Limitations: Further work on productivity might assess additional potential predictors including marital status, grant funding, and presence of young children. Conclusion: There is no significant difference between the genders in research quality. Similar results have been noted in previous work on prolific scientists.
目的:虽然有大量关于性别和科研生产力的文献,但结果喜忧参半,没有关于自杀学的研究。本调查填补了这一空白,并聚焦于有影响力的精英人群。研究方法数据来自科学网(WoS)。这些数据指的是在 WoS 上被引用 70 篇或以上自杀主题著作的最多产的自杀学家(N = 116)。衡量研究生产力的指标包括自杀相关著作的数量、这些著作的引用次数以及 h 指数。性别与研究生产率之间的联系根据工作年限、当地研究集群成员资格和世界地区进行了调整。研究结果在对其他预测因素进行调整后,男性发表的论文多于女性。然而,性别并不能预测研究质量的任何一项指标(引用次数、h 指数)。在大多数分析中,工作年限和研究集群成员资格都能预测研究生产力。地区与研究生产力无关。局限性:有关生产率的进一步研究可能会评估其他潜在的预测因素,包括婚姻状况、基金资助和是否有年幼子女。结论:两性在研究质量方面没有明显差异。以前关于多产科学家的研究也有类似结果。
{"title":"Does Gender Predict Research Productivity? The Case of Prolific Suicidologists.","authors":"Steven Stack, David Lester","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000973","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000973","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Aims</i>: While there is substantial literature on gender and research productivity, bearing mixed results, no study is available for suicidology. The present investigation fills this gap and focuses on an influential elite. <i>Methods</i>: Data are taken from the Web of Science (WoS). They refer to the most prolific suicidologists (<i>N</i> = 116) with 70 or more works on the subject of suicide cited in WoS. Measures of research productivity include the number of works on suicide, citations to these works, and the h-index. The link between gender and the measures of research productivity is adjusted for years of experience, membership in a local research cluster, and region of the world. <i>Results</i>: Adjusting for the other predictors, males had more publications than females. However, gender did not predict either measure of quality of research (citations, h-index). Years of experience, as well as membership in a research cluster, predicted research productivity in most analyses. Region was unrelated to research productivity. <i>Limitations</i>: Further work on productivity might assess additional potential predictors including marital status, grant funding, and presence of young children. <i>Conclusion</i>: There is no significant difference between the genders in research quality. Similar results have been noted in previous work on prolific scientists.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"439-442"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142394291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000974
Lai Fong Chan, Nurashikin Ibrahim, Noor Raihan Khamal, Ravivarma Rao Panirselvam, Emmanuel Joseph Pereira, Murad Khan
{"title":"A Global Call for Decriminalization of Attempted Suicide.","authors":"Lai Fong Chan, Nurashikin Ibrahim, Noor Raihan Khamal, Ravivarma Rao Panirselvam, Emmanuel Joseph Pereira, Murad Khan","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000974","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000974","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":"45 6","pages":"383-388"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142639154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-08-13DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000965
Anna Wagner, Doreen Reifegerste
Background: Despite men's high suicide risk, gender perspectives in suicide prevention research are scarce. Aims: The goal of this systematic review was to describe the desirable and adverse effects of distribution channels and message strategies of communicative suicide prevention interventions among men. Methods: Databases PubMed and Web of Science were searched for quantitative randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies examining the effectiveness of male-specific or general communicative interventions among men. Narrative synthesis was used to summarize findings. Results: Fifty-five studies published in peer-reviewed articles until October 15, 2021, were included. Findings demonstrate that interpersonal, mass media, and digital media interventions impact suicide-related outcomes preventively. Mass media interventions are not suitable to impact men's emotions in a prevention-desirable way. Message strategies interactivity, emotional appeals, and clear calls to action demonstrated high effectiveness, while expert exemplars, visualizations, and personalization were rather ineffective. Limitations: However, the review was not able to prove causality, could not distinguish between multichannel interventions and single-channel interventions, or between specific combinations of channels and message strategies. Discussion: The systematic review provides some guidance on which channels and message strategies to apply in communicative suicide prevention for men.
背景:尽管男性自杀风险很高,但自杀预防研究中的性别视角却很少。目的:本系统综述旨在描述传播渠道和信息策略对男性自杀预防干预的理想和不利影响。研究方法在 PubMed 和 Web of Science 数据库中检索了定量随机对照试验 (RCT) 和非随机研究,这些研究考察了针对男性的或一般的沟通式干预措施在男性中的有效性。研究结果采用叙事综合法进行总结。结果:收录了截至 2021 年 10 月 15 日发表在同行评审文章中的 55 项研究。研究结果表明,人际交往、大众媒体和数字媒体干预对自杀相关结果具有预防性影响。大众媒体干预并不适合以预防自杀的方式影响男性的情绪。信息策略的互动性、情感诉求和明确的行动号召表现出较高的有效性,而专家范例、可视化和个性化则效果不佳。局限性:然而,综述无法证明因果关系,无法区分多渠道干预和单一渠道干预,也无法区分渠道和信息策略的具体组合。讨论:本系统综述为在预防男性交流性自杀中应用哪些渠道和信息策略提供了一些指导。
{"title":"Desirable and Adverse Effects of Communicative Suicide Prevention Interventions Among Men.","authors":"Anna Wagner, Doreen Reifegerste","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000965","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000965","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Despite men's high suicide risk, gender perspectives in suicide prevention research are scarce. <i>Aims</i><b><i>:</i></b> The goal of this systematic review was to describe the desirable and adverse effects of distribution channels and message strategies of communicative suicide prevention interventions among men. <i>Methods</i><b><i>:</i></b> Databases PubMed and Web of Science were searched for quantitative randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies examining the effectiveness of male-specific or general communicative interventions among men. Narrative synthesis was used to summarize findings. <i>Results:</i> Fifty-five studies published in peer-reviewed articles until October 15, 2021, were included. Findings demonstrate that interpersonal, mass media, and digital media interventions impact suicide-related outcomes preventively. Mass media interventions are not suitable to impact men's emotions in a prevention-desirable way. Message strategies interactivity, emotional appeals, and clear calls to action demonstrated high effectiveness, while expert exemplars, visualizations, and personalization were rather ineffective. <i>Limitations</i><b><i>:</i></b> However, the review was not able to prove causality, could not distinguish between multichannel interventions and single-channel interventions, or between specific combinations of channels and message strategies. <i>Discussion:</i> The systematic review provides some guidance on which channels and message strategies to apply in communicative suicide prevention for men.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"365-375"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141972099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-03-18DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000955
Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, Hannah Metzler, Zrinka Laido, Benedikt Till, Alison H Lake, Emily Noble, Saba Chowdhury, Frances Gonzalez, David Garcia, John Draper, Sean Murphy, Madelyn Gould
Background: Between April 7 and 14, 2019, the "Breaking the Silence" media engagement campaign was launched in Oregon. Aims: We aimed to assess the consistency of media content related to the campaign with media guidelines and the quantitative footprint on Twitter (now X) over time. Method: Media items related to the campaign were analyzed regarding focus and consistency with media guidelines for suicide reporting and compared with other suicide-related reports published in the same time frame, as well as with reporting in Washington, the control region. Tweets related to the campaign were retrieved to assess the social media footprint. Results: There were n = 104 media items in the campaign month, mainly in the campaign week. Items typically used a narrative featuring suicide advocacy or policy/prevention programs. As compared to other items with a similar focus, they scored better on several protective characteristics listed in media recommendations. Stories of coping with adversity, however, were scarce. The social media footprint on Twitter was small. Limitations: Inability to make causal claims about campaign impact. Conclusion: Media items from the Breaking the Silence campaign appeared mainly consistent with media guidelines, but some aspects, such as stories of recovery, were under-represented.
{"title":"\"Breaking the Silence\" Suicide Prevention Media Campaign in Oregon, April 7-14, 2019.","authors":"Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, Hannah Metzler, Zrinka Laido, Benedikt Till, Alison H Lake, Emily Noble, Saba Chowdhury, Frances Gonzalez, David Garcia, John Draper, Sean Murphy, Madelyn Gould","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000955","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000955","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background</i>: Between April 7 and 14, 2019, the \"Breaking the Silence\" media engagement campaign was launched in Oregon. <i>Aims:</i> We aimed to assess the consistency of media content related to the campaign with media guidelines and the quantitative footprint on Twitter (now X) over time. <i>Method:</i> Media items related to the campaign were analyzed regarding focus and consistency with media guidelines for suicide reporting and compared with other suicide-related reports published in the same time frame, as well as with reporting in Washington, the control region. Tweets related to the campaign were retrieved to assess the social media footprint. <i>Results:</i> There were <i>n</i> = 104 media items in the campaign month, mainly in the campaign week. Items typically used a narrative featuring suicide advocacy or policy/prevention programs. As compared to other items with a similar focus, they scored better on several protective characteristics listed in media recommendations. Stories of coping with adversity, however, were scarce. The social media footprint on Twitter was small. <i>Limitations:</i> Inability to make causal claims about campaign impact. <i>Conclusion:</i> Media items from the Breaking the Silence campaign appeared mainly consistent with media guidelines, but some aspects, such as stories of recovery, were under-represented.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"330-338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140144381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-07-30DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000953
Simon Hatcher, Mark Sinyor, Nicole E Edgar, Ayal Schaffer, Sarah E MacLean, R Nicholas Carleton, Ian Colman, Navitha Jayakumar, Brooklyn Ward, Rabia Zaheer
Background: There is conflicting evidence on the suicide rates of different public safety personnel (PSP). There have been few studies that compare suicides in PSP with the general population and none that have used a detailed comparison of coroner records. Aims: The current study estimates suicide rates among different PSP and compares PSP suicides with the general population. Method: We identified coroner records of PSP suicides from January 2014 to December 2018 and compared each one to two matched general population controls. Results: We identified 36 PSP suicides and 72 general population controls. Police had a higher suicide rate than other PSP groups. PSP were more likely to die by firearm, be separated/divorced or married, die in a motor vehicle, have problems at work, and have a PTSD diagnosis. PSP were less likely to die by jumping. Limitations: The study may have not identified all PSP suicides. Apart from the cause of death, data in coroner records are not systematically collected, so information may be incomplete. Conclusion: PSP suicides appear different than the general population. Death records need to have an occupation identifier to enable monitoring of trends in occupational groups, such as PSP.
{"title":"A Comparison of Suicides in Public Safety Personnel With Suicides in the General Population in Ontario, 2014 to 2018.","authors":"Simon Hatcher, Mark Sinyor, Nicole E Edgar, Ayal Schaffer, Sarah E MacLean, R Nicholas Carleton, Ian Colman, Navitha Jayakumar, Brooklyn Ward, Rabia Zaheer","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000953","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000953","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> There is conflicting evidence on the suicide rates of different public safety personnel (PSP). There have been few studies that compare suicides in PSP with the general population and none that have used a detailed comparison of coroner records. <i>Aims:</i> The current study estimates suicide rates among different PSP and compares PSP suicides with the general population. <i>Method:</i> We identified coroner records of PSP suicides from January 2014 to December 2018 and compared each one to two matched general population controls. <i>Results:</i> We identified 36 PSP suicides and 72 general population controls. Police had a higher suicide rate than other PSP groups. PSP were more likely to die by firearm, be separated/divorced or married, die in a motor vehicle, have problems at work, and have a PTSD diagnosis. PSP were less likely to die by jumping. <i>Limitations:</i> The study may have not identified all PSP suicides. Apart from the cause of death, data in coroner records are not systematically collected, so information may be incomplete. <i>Conclusion:</i> PSP suicides appear different than the general population. Death records need to have an occupation identifier to enable monitoring of trends in occupational groups, such as PSP.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"355-363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423415/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140865761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-04-10DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000954
Tina Podlogar, Gregor Žvelc, Diego De Leo
Background: Mental health professionals encounter numerous difficulties when working with suicidal clients. To understand these difficulties in clinical practice better, a valid instrument measuring them is needed. Aims: This study aimed to translate the Difficulties in Suicidal Behaviors Intervention Questionnaire (DSBQ) to Slovene, validate it, and explore Slovenian professionals' experiences with it. Method: The participants were 106 professionals (19 men, 87 women), aged 26-66 years. Apart from the DSBQ, scales on attitudes toward suicide prevention and coping strategies in difficult clinical situations were used. The data were collected between October 2017 and January 2019. Results: Although slightly diverging from the originally reported component structure, the Slovene translation of the DSBQ measures difficulties in working with suicidal clients with acceptable/good reliability and sensitivity, and adequate construct validity. Slovenian professionals most commonly experience difficulties related to working with children, followed by technical, system and setting, and other types of difficulties. Limitations: The sample of participants was relatively heterogeneous. Conclusion: Further studies of the DSBQ structure and validity, as well as difficulties, especially those related to working with children/adolescents and facing the theme of death, are warranted. Considering the difficulties most frequently reported in this investigation, more efforts are also needed in Slovenia to address technical and logistic aspects.
{"title":"Slovene Translation of the Difficulties in Suicidal Behaviors Intervention Questionnaire (DSBQ).","authors":"Tina Podlogar, Gregor Žvelc, Diego De Leo","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000954","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000954","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background</i>: Mental health professionals encounter numerous difficulties when working with suicidal clients. To understand these difficulties in clinical practice better, a valid instrument measuring them is needed. <i>Aims:</i> This study aimed to translate the Difficulties in Suicidal Behaviors Intervention Questionnaire (DSBQ) to Slovene, validate it, and explore Slovenian professionals' experiences with it. <i>Method</i>: The participants were 106 professionals (19 men, 87 women), aged 26-66 years. Apart from the DSBQ, scales on attitudes toward suicide prevention and coping strategies in difficult clinical situations were used. The data were collected between October 2017 and January 2019. <i>Results</i>: Although slightly diverging from the originally reported component structure, the Slovene translation of the DSBQ measures difficulties in working with suicidal clients with acceptable/good reliability and sensitivity, and adequate construct validity. Slovenian professionals most commonly experience difficulties related to working with children, followed by technical, system and setting, and other types of difficulties. <i>Limitations</i><i>:</i> The sample of participants was relatively heterogeneous. <i>Conclusion:</i> Further studies of the DSBQ structure and validity, as well as difficulties, especially those related to working with children/adolescents and facing the theme of death, are warranted. Considering the difficulties most frequently reported in this investigation, more efforts are also needed in Slovenia to address technical and logistic aspects.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"323-329"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140873084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-07-02DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000963
Robert A King
Background: Sometimes during real or presumed life-threatening and/or near-death circumstances, an individual undergoes an altered state of consciousness referred to as a near-death experience (NDE). The prevalent position in the field of NDE research for the last several decades has been that such experiences result in positive antisuicidal attitudes and that it is highly unlikely that experients will try to kill themselves afterward. In addition, the important consideration of passive suicidal ideation is neglected in NDE research. Aims: To question the premature assumption that people are highly unlikely to die by suicide after an NDE. Method: Four case studies of suicide after an NDE are provided and examined. Results: Although important quantitative data are still needed, it can no longer be argued that people do not die by suicide after an NDE. Limitations: Only four cases were available for examination, and the degree of impact that the NDE had on their suicide is uncertain. Conclusion: Much more research is needed on suicide risk post NDE. In the meantime, the NDE should not be ignored in suicide assessments, but therapists and other relevant professionals need to be attentive to any possible indications of either active or passive suicidal ideation post NDE.
背景:有时,在真实的或假定的危及生命和/或濒临死亡的情况下,人的意识会发生改变,这种改变被称为濒死体验(NDE)。过去几十年来,濒死体验研究领域的普遍观点是,这种体验会导致积极的反自杀态度,体验者事后试图自杀的可能性很小。此外,NDE 研究还忽视了被动自杀意念这一重要因素。目的:质疑 "人们在经历 NDE 后自杀身亡的可能性很小 "这一不成熟的假设。研究方法:提供并研究四例 NDE 后自杀的案例。结果:尽管仍需要重要的定量数据,但不能再认为人们不会在NDE后自杀身亡。局限性:只有四个案例可供研究,而且 NDE 对自杀的影响程度还不确定。结论:还需要对 NDE 后的自杀风险进行更多的研究。与此同时,在进行自杀评估时不应忽视NDE,但治疗师和其他相关专业人员需要注意NDE后主动或被动自杀意念的任何可能迹象。
{"title":"Suicide Following a Near-Death Experience.","authors":"Robert A King","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000963","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000963","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Sometimes during real or presumed life-threatening and/or near-death circumstances, an individual undergoes an altered state of consciousness referred to as a near-death experience (NDE). The prevalent position in the field of NDE research for the last several decades has been that such experiences result in positive antisuicidal attitudes and that it is highly unlikely that experients will try to kill themselves afterward. In addition, the important consideration of passive suicidal ideation is neglected in NDE research. <i>Aims:</i> To question the premature assumption that people are highly unlikely to die by suicide after an NDE. <i>Method:</i> Four case studies of suicide after an NDE are provided and examined. <i>Results:</i> Although important quantitative data are still needed, it can no longer be argued that people do not die by suicide after an NDE. <i>Limitations:</i> Only four cases were available for examination, and the degree of impact that the NDE had on their suicide is uncertain. <i>Conclusion:</i> Much more research is needed on suicide risk post NDE. In the meantime, the NDE should not be ignored in suicide assessments, but therapists and other relevant professionals need to be attentive to any possible indications of either active or passive suicidal ideation post NDE.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"348-354"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141493895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000972
Piumee Bandara, Linda Bowden, Chan Lai Fong, Jane Pirkis
{"title":"Women in Suicide Prevention Research.","authors":"Piumee Bandara, Linda Bowden, Chan Lai Fong, Jane Pirkis","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000972","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000972","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":"45 5","pages":"317-322"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-04-10DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000956
Stefanie Kirchner, Benedikt Till, Zrinka Laido, Thomas Niederkrotenthaler
Background: Little is known about the quality of media reports on suicide and prevention targeting persons with sexual or gender minority identities (LGBTQ+). Aims: To assess the quality of suicide-related media reporting of LGBTQ+ people and its consistency with media guidelines. Method: We conducted a content analysis of 5,652 media items in two US states (Washington and Oregon) published within 1 year. Results: There were only few differences in the reporting about suicide in LGBTQ+ as compared to non-LGBTQ+ reports. LGBTQ+ media items more often portrayed suicide as monocausal [Oregon: OR = 1.75, 95% CI (1.03-2.98), p = .038; Washington: OR = 3.00, 95% CI (1.81-4.97), p < .001] and linked them to adverse life experiences [OR = 2.16, 95% CI (1.38-3.38), p < .001; OR = 2.09, 95% CI (1.30-3.38), p = .002] than non-LGBTQ+ items. They also more often featured mental health experts [OR = 1.79, 95% CI (1.04-3.10), p = .034; OR = 2.12, 95% CI (1.23-3.67), p = .006] and contacts to support services [OR = 2.22, 95% CI (1.41-3.48), p < .001; OR = 2.70, 95% CI (1.64-4.45), p < .001]. Limitations: Aspects possibly influencing the portrayal of LGBTQ+ suicide and prevention beyond the characteristics listed were not investigated. Conclusion: Suicide-related media reporting related to LGBTQ+ issues features potentially beneficial aspects but tends to overlook multifactorial causes of suicide. Diverse factors contributing to LGBTQ+ suicide and prevention warrant greater attention.
背景:关于媒体对性少数群体或性别少数群体(LGBTQ+)的自杀和自杀预防报道的质量,人们知之甚少。目的:评估媒体对 LGBTQ+ 自杀相关报道的质量及其与媒体指南的一致性。方法:对我们对美国两个州(华盛顿州和俄勒冈州)一年内发布的 5,652 篇媒体报道进行了内容分析。结果显示与非 LGBTQ+ 的报道相比,LGBTQ+ 对自杀的报道几乎没有差异。LGBTQ+ 媒体报道更多地将自杀描述为单因自杀[俄勒冈州:OR=1.75,95% CI (1.03-2.98),p=0.038;华盛顿州:OR = 3.00,95% CI (1.81-4.97),p < .001],并且与非 LGBTQ+ 媒体相比,将自杀与不良生活经历联系起来[OR = 2.16,95% CI (1.38-3.38),p .001;OR = 2.09,95% CI (1.30-3.38),p = .002]。他们还更经常地介绍心理健康专家[OR = 1.79,95% CI (1.04-3.10),p = .034;OR = 2.12,95% CI (1.23-3.67),p = .006]和支持服务联系人[OR = 2.22,95% CI (1.41-3.48),p < .001;OR = 2.70,95% CI (1.64-4.45),p < .001]。局限性:除列出的特征外,未调查可能影响 LGBTQ+ 自杀形象和预防的其他方面。结论:与 LGBTQ+ 问题相关的自杀相关媒体报道具有潜在的有益方面,但往往忽略了自杀的多因素原因。导致 LGBTQ+ 自杀和自杀预防的多种因素值得更多关注。
{"title":"Suicide-Related Media Reporting With a Focus on Sexual and Gender Minority Identities.","authors":"Stefanie Kirchner, Benedikt Till, Zrinka Laido, Thomas Niederkrotenthaler","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000956","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000956","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Little is known about the quality of media reports on suicide and prevention targeting persons with sexual or gender minority identities (LGBTQ+). <i>Aims:</i> To assess the quality of suicide-related media reporting of LGBTQ+ people and its consistency with media guidelines. <i>Method:</i> We conducted a content analysis of 5,652 media items in two US states (Washington and Oregon) published within 1 year. <i>Results:</i> There were only few differences in the reporting about suicide in LGBTQ+ as compared to non-LGBTQ+ reports. LGBTQ+ media items more often portrayed suicide as monocausal [Oregon: <i>OR</i> = 1.75, 95% CI (1.03-2.98), <i>p</i> = .038; Washington: <i>OR</i> = 3.00, 95% CI (1.81-4.97), <i>p</i> < .001] and linked them to adverse life experiences [<i>OR</i> = 2.16, 95% CI (1.38-3.38), <i>p <</i> .001; <i>OR</i> = 2.09, 95% CI (1.30-3.38), <i>p</i> = .002] than non-LGBTQ+ items. They also more often featured mental health experts [<i>OR</i> = 1.79, 95% CI (1.04-3.10), <i>p</i> = .034; <i>OR</i> = 2.12, 95% CI (1.23-3.67), <i>p</i> = .006] and contacts to support services [<i>OR</i> = 2.22, 95% CI (1.41-3.48), <i>p</i> < .001; <i>OR</i> = 2.70, 95% CI (1.64-4.45), <i>p</i> < .001]. <i>Limitations:</i> Aspects possibly influencing the portrayal of LGBTQ+ suicide and prevention beyond the characteristics listed were not investigated. <i>Conclusion:</i> Suicide-related media reporting related to LGBTQ+ issues features potentially beneficial aspects but tends to overlook multifactorial causes of suicide. Diverse factors contributing to LGBTQ+ suicide and prevention warrant greater attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"339-347"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140855610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}