Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000984
{"title":"Announcements.","authors":"","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000984","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000984","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":"45 6","pages":"446-448"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142639163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-07-26DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000964
Alexander Lundberg, Maryann Mason, Lori Ann Post
Background: Prevention strategies for suicide emphasize restrictions on firearm access. These restrictions may lose efficacy if individuals substitute other lethal suicide methods. Aims: The objective of this study is to determine the extent to which individuals who die by suicide in the United States substitute hanging for firearm injury. Methods: This study is a repeated cross-sectional analysis of suicide deaths in the United States from 2003 to 2021. Multiple regression was used to estimate the effect of firearm access proxies on individual suicide methods (hanging vs. firearm injury). Results: The probability of death by hanging was significantly and negatively associated with proxies of firearm access. Limitations: This study does not compare crude rates of suicide by state, which rise on average with rates of firearm ownership. The National Violent Death Reporting System expanded over the sample period, so early years have incomplete ascertainment. Rates of gun ownership and gun safety law scales are measured as proxies. Conclusions: Although means restriction around firearm access is a critical tool for suicide prevention, complementary strategies for prevention around hanging merit further study.
背景:自杀预防策略强调限制使用枪支。如果有人用其他致命的自杀方式替代,这些限制措施就可能失去效力。目的:本研究旨在确定美国自杀死亡者用上吊代替枪支伤害的程度。研究方法:本研究对美国 2003 年至 2021 年期间的自杀死亡案例进行了重复横截面分析。采用多元回归法估算了枪支使用替代物对个人自杀方式(上吊与枪支伤害)的影响。结果显示上吊死亡的概率与使用枪支的可能性呈显著负相关。局限性:这项研究没有比较各州的粗略自杀率,而各州的粗略自杀率会随着枪支拥有率的上升而平均上升。国家暴力死亡报告系统(National Violent Death Reporting System)在样本期内不断扩大,因此早年的调查数据并不完整。枪支拥有率和枪支安全法尺度是作为代用指标来衡量的。结论:虽然对枪支使用的手段限制是预防自杀的重要工具,但围绕绞刑的补充性预防策略也值得进一步研究。
{"title":"Substitution of Methods in Suicide Deaths - Firearm Injury and Hanging.","authors":"Alexander Lundberg, Maryann Mason, Lori Ann Post","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000964","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000964","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Prevention strategies for suicide emphasize restrictions on firearm access. These restrictions may lose efficacy if individuals substitute other lethal suicide methods. <i>Aims:</i> The objective of this study is to determine the extent to which individuals who die by suicide in the United States substitute hanging for firearm injury. <i>Methods:</i> This study is a repeated cross-sectional analysis of suicide deaths in the United States from 2003 to 2021. Multiple regression was used to estimate the effect of firearm access proxies on individual suicide methods (hanging vs. firearm injury). <i>Results:</i> The probability of death by hanging was significantly and negatively associated with proxies of firearm access. <i>Limitations:</i> This study does not compare crude rates of suicide by state, which rise on average with rates of firearm ownership. The National Violent Death Reporting System expanded over the sample period, so early years have incomplete ascertainment. Rates of gun ownership and gun safety law scales are measured as proxies. <i>Conclusions:</i> Although means restriction around firearm access is a critical tool for suicide prevention, complementary strategies for prevention around hanging merit further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"389-394"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141761732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-08-13DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000968
Leo Roberts, Angela Clapperton, Jeremy Dwyer, Matthew J Spittal
Background: Real-time suicide registers are being established in many countries and enable regular monitoring of suspected suicides over time. The use of these data to monitor for suicide clusters is in its infancy. Aims: We sought to test the feasibility of using real-time suicide register data to detect spatiotemporal suicide clusters. Method: Using the Victorian Suicide Register and SaTScan's spatiotemporal scan statistic, we simulated a monthly search for clusters from January 2015 to June 2022 using rolling 2-year windows of data in each search. Monthly scans were performed at three different levels of geographic granularity and for all-ages and under-25 populations. Results: Our results indicated the rapid identification of possible suicide clusters and demonstrated a practical approach to combining real-time suicide data and scanning algorithms. We developed new model outputs that showed cluster timelines. Limitations: The main limitations are that the computational burden of fitting multiple models meant we were unable to scan for ellipses and other irregular shapes and we were unable to consider space-time permutation models. Conclusions: Using data from a real-time suicide register, we were able to scan for space-time suicide clusters simulating the situation where the data are updated monthly with new updates.
{"title":"Using Real-Time Coronial Data to Detect Spatiotemporal Suicide Clusters.","authors":"Leo Roberts, Angela Clapperton, Jeremy Dwyer, Matthew J Spittal","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000968","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000968","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Real-time suicide registers are being established in many countries and enable regular monitoring of suspected suicides over time. The use of these data to monitor for suicide clusters is in its infancy. <i>Aims:</i> We sought to test the feasibility of using real-time suicide register data to detect spatiotemporal suicide clusters. <i>Method:</i> Using the Victorian Suicide Register and SaTScan's spatiotemporal scan statistic, we simulated a monthly search for clusters from January 2015 to June 2022 using rolling 2-year windows of data in each search. Monthly scans were performed at three different levels of geographic granularity and for all-ages and under-25 populations. <i>Results:</i> Our results indicated the rapid identification of possible suicide clusters and demonstrated a practical approach to combining real-time suicide data and scanning algorithms. We developed new model outputs that showed cluster timelines. <i>Limitations:</i> The main limitations are that the computational burden of fitting multiple models meant we were unable to scan for ellipses and other irregular shapes and we were unable to consider space-time permutation models. <i>Conclusions:</i> Using data from a real-time suicide register, we were able to scan for space-time suicide clusters simulating the situation where the data are updated monthly with new updates.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"395-402"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11601270/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141972100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000979
Matthew Kelly, Bessie Liu, Hana Minsky, Paul Nestadt, Joseph J Gallo
Background: In 2018, news outlets began reporting on a suicide epidemic among New York City's yellow taxi drivers. Within months, print, television, radio, and internet outlets had produced pieces describing the deaths of drivers struggling to endure transformations in their industry. Aims: We explored taxi drivers' perspectives regarding suicide news coverage and the degree to which the coverage affected their lives. Methods: Current and recent taxi drivers participated in open-ended, life-history-informed interviews, which were transcribed and analyzed thematically. Results: We interviewed 21 participants. Four themes related to interviewees' experience of suicide-related media coverage emerged: drivers' awareness of the news coverage and opinions regarding it, the degree to which the coverage motivated drivers to engage in conversation with others about stress, the extent to which coverage inspired drivers to think differently about mental health, and perceptions regarding the media's broader characterization of taxi drivers. Limitations: Interviews were conducted in English, a second language for many taxi drivers. Conclusion: Taxi drivers expressed diverse views regarding media reporting on driver suicides, with some viewing it as helpful, while others critiqued it as simplistic, stigmatizing, and sensationalist.
{"title":"New York Taxi Driver Perspectives on News Coverage of Driver Suicides.","authors":"Matthew Kelly, Bessie Liu, Hana Minsky, Paul Nestadt, Joseph J Gallo","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000979","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000979","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> In 2018, news outlets began reporting on a suicide epidemic among New York City's yellow taxi drivers. Within months, print, television, radio, and internet outlets had produced pieces describing the deaths of drivers struggling to endure transformations in their industry. <i>Aims:</i> We explored taxi drivers' perspectives regarding suicide news coverage and the degree to which the coverage affected their lives. <i>Methods:</i> Current and recent taxi drivers participated in open-ended, life-history-informed interviews, which were transcribed and analyzed thematically. <i>Results:</i> We interviewed 21 participants. Four themes related to interviewees' experience of suicide-related media coverage emerged: drivers' awareness of the news coverage and opinions regarding it, the degree to which the coverage motivated drivers to engage in conversation with others about stress, the extent to which coverage inspired drivers to think differently about mental health, and perceptions regarding the media's broader characterization of taxi drivers. <i>Limitations:</i> Interviews were conducted in English, a second language for many taxi drivers. <i>Conclusion:</i> Taxi drivers expressed diverse views regarding media reporting on driver suicides, with some viewing it as helpful, while others critiqued it as simplistic, stigmatizing, and sensationalist.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":"45 6","pages":"425-431"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142639078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000977
Denise Kingi-Ulu'ave, Chris Framptom, Tania Cargo, Karolina Stasiak, Sarah Hetrick
Background: While Gatekeeper Training (GKT) is an accepted component of suicide prevention strategies, there is little evidence about its effectiveness with Indigenous populations and online. Aims: This study examined the effects of LifeKeepers, a novel GKT, comprising three modalities: General, e-learning, and a culturally tailored Māori (New Zealand Indigenous) training. Methods: A total of 5,981 participants completed measures of declarative knowledge, perceived knowledge, and self-efficacy pre- and post-training. Participants rated satisfaction with LifeKeepers, its safety considerations and cultural acceptability post-training. Results: There were statistically significant improvements across all outcome measures (declarative knowledge 1.3 [95% CI 1.3-1.4], perceived knowledge 10.9 [95% CI 10.7-11.1], and self-efficacy 2.5 [95% CI 2.5-2.6]), including across all modalities. More than 90% of participants rated satisfaction, cultural acceptability, and safety considerations highly. Limitations: Without a control group, changes may not be solely due to engagement in LifeKeepers. Conclusions: This study offers preliminary evidence of the immediate effectiveness of LifeKeepers, across its in-person, Indigenous Māori, and e-learning modalities. It addresses a critical literature gap by exploring participants' safety perspectives and strongly supports LifeKeepers as a primary suicide prevention intervention in New Zealand, especially for Indigenous Māori communities. Comparable outcomes for e-learning participants indicate wider accessibility, bolstering suicide prevention efforts.
背景:虽然守门人培训(GKT)是自杀预防策略中一个公认的组成部分,但有关其对土著居民和网络的有效性的证据却很少。目的:本研究考察了 LifeKeepers 的效果:一般培训、电子学习培训和针对毛利人(新西兰土著)文化的培训。培训方法共有 5981 名参与者在培训前后完成了陈述性知识、感知知识和自我效能的测量。参与者在培训后对 LifeKeepers 的满意度、安全考虑因素和文化可接受性进行评分。结果:所有结果指标均有统计学意义上的明显改善(陈述性知识 1.3 [95% CI 1.3-1.4],感知性知识 10.9 [95% CI 10.7-11.1],自我效能 2.5 [95% CI 2.5-2.6]),包括所有模式。超过 90% 的参与者对满意度、文化可接受性和安全性给予了高度评价。局限性:由于没有对照组,因此改变可能不完全是参与 LifeKeepers 所带来的。结论:本研究初步证明了 LifeKeepers 的即时有效性,包括面对面学习、土著毛利人学习和电子学习模式。该研究通过探索参与者的安全视角,填补了文献空白,并有力地支持将 "生命守护者 "作为新西兰预防自杀的主要干预措施,尤其是针对土著毛利社区。电子学习参与者的可比结果表明,电子学习具有更广泛的可及性,有助于自杀预防工作。
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact and Cultural Relevance of LifeKeepers Gatekeeper Training Across Three Training Modalities.","authors":"Denise Kingi-Ulu'ave, Chris Framptom, Tania Cargo, Karolina Stasiak, Sarah Hetrick","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000977","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000977","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>: While Gatekeeper Training (GKT) is an accepted component of suicide prevention strategies, there is little evidence about its effectiveness with Indigenous populations and online. <i>Aims</i>: This study examined the effects of LifeKeepers, a novel GKT, comprising three modalities: General, e-learning, and a culturally tailored Māori (New Zealand Indigenous) training. <i>Methods</i>: A total of 5,981 participants completed measures of declarative knowledge, perceived knowledge, and self-efficacy pre- and post-training. Participants rated satisfaction with LifeKeepers, its safety considerations and cultural acceptability post-training. <i>Results</i>: There were statistically significant improvements across all outcome measures (declarative knowledge 1.3 [95% CI 1.3-1.4], perceived knowledge 10.9 [95% CI 10.7-11.1], and self-efficacy 2.5 [95% CI 2.5-2.6]), including across all modalities. More than 90% of participants rated satisfaction, cultural acceptability, and safety considerations highly. <i>Limitations:</i> Without a control group, changes may not be solely due to engagement in LifeKeepers. <i>Conclusions</i>: This study offers preliminary evidence of the immediate effectiveness of LifeKeepers, across its in-person, Indigenous Māori, and e-learning modalities. It addresses a critical literature gap by exploring participants' safety perspectives and strongly supports LifeKeepers as a primary suicide prevention intervention in New Zealand, especially for Indigenous Māori communities. Comparable outcomes for e-learning participants indicate wider accessibility, bolstering suicide prevention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":"45 6","pages":"417-424"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142639165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-10-09DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000973
Steven Stack, David Lester
Aims: While there is substantial literature on gender and research productivity, bearing mixed results, no study is available for suicidology. The present investigation fills this gap and focuses on an influential elite. Methods: Data are taken from the Web of Science (WoS). They refer to the most prolific suicidologists (N = 116) with 70 or more works on the subject of suicide cited in WoS. Measures of research productivity include the number of works on suicide, citations to these works, and the h-index. The link between gender and the measures of research productivity is adjusted for years of experience, membership in a local research cluster, and region of the world. Results: Adjusting for the other predictors, males had more publications than females. However, gender did not predict either measure of quality of research (citations, h-index). Years of experience, as well as membership in a research cluster, predicted research productivity in most analyses. Region was unrelated to research productivity. Limitations: Further work on productivity might assess additional potential predictors including marital status, grant funding, and presence of young children. Conclusion: There is no significant difference between the genders in research quality. Similar results have been noted in previous work on prolific scientists.
目的:虽然有大量关于性别和科研生产力的文献,但结果喜忧参半,没有关于自杀学的研究。本调查填补了这一空白,并聚焦于有影响力的精英人群。研究方法数据来自科学网(WoS)。这些数据指的是在 WoS 上被引用 70 篇或以上自杀主题著作的最多产的自杀学家(N = 116)。衡量研究生产力的指标包括自杀相关著作的数量、这些著作的引用次数以及 h 指数。性别与研究生产率之间的联系根据工作年限、当地研究集群成员资格和世界地区进行了调整。研究结果在对其他预测因素进行调整后,男性发表的论文多于女性。然而,性别并不能预测研究质量的任何一项指标(引用次数、h 指数)。在大多数分析中,工作年限和研究集群成员资格都能预测研究生产力。地区与研究生产力无关。局限性:有关生产率的进一步研究可能会评估其他潜在的预测因素,包括婚姻状况、基金资助和是否有年幼子女。结论:两性在研究质量方面没有明显差异。以前关于多产科学家的研究也有类似结果。
{"title":"Does Gender Predict Research Productivity? The Case of Prolific Suicidologists.","authors":"Steven Stack, David Lester","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000973","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000973","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Aims</i>: While there is substantial literature on gender and research productivity, bearing mixed results, no study is available for suicidology. The present investigation fills this gap and focuses on an influential elite. <i>Methods</i>: Data are taken from the Web of Science (WoS). They refer to the most prolific suicidologists (<i>N</i> = 116) with 70 or more works on the subject of suicide cited in WoS. Measures of research productivity include the number of works on suicide, citations to these works, and the h-index. The link between gender and the measures of research productivity is adjusted for years of experience, membership in a local research cluster, and region of the world. <i>Results</i>: Adjusting for the other predictors, males had more publications than females. However, gender did not predict either measure of quality of research (citations, h-index). Years of experience, as well as membership in a research cluster, predicted research productivity in most analyses. Region was unrelated to research productivity. <i>Limitations</i>: Further work on productivity might assess additional potential predictors including marital status, grant funding, and presence of young children. <i>Conclusion</i>: There is no significant difference between the genders in research quality. Similar results have been noted in previous work on prolific scientists.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"439-442"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142394291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000974
Lai Fong Chan, Nurashikin Ibrahim, Noor Raihan Khamal, Ravivarma Rao Panirselvam, Emmanuel Joseph Pereira, Murad Khan
{"title":"A Global Call for Decriminalization of Attempted Suicide.","authors":"Lai Fong Chan, Nurashikin Ibrahim, Noor Raihan Khamal, Ravivarma Rao Panirselvam, Emmanuel Joseph Pereira, Murad Khan","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000974","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000974","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":"45 6","pages":"383-388"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142639154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-08-13DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000965
Anna Wagner, Doreen Reifegerste
Background: Despite men's high suicide risk, gender perspectives in suicide prevention research are scarce. Aims: The goal of this systematic review was to describe the desirable and adverse effects of distribution channels and message strategies of communicative suicide prevention interventions among men. Methods: Databases PubMed and Web of Science were searched for quantitative randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies examining the effectiveness of male-specific or general communicative interventions among men. Narrative synthesis was used to summarize findings. Results: Fifty-five studies published in peer-reviewed articles until October 15, 2021, were included. Findings demonstrate that interpersonal, mass media, and digital media interventions impact suicide-related outcomes preventively. Mass media interventions are not suitable to impact men's emotions in a prevention-desirable way. Message strategies interactivity, emotional appeals, and clear calls to action demonstrated high effectiveness, while expert exemplars, visualizations, and personalization were rather ineffective. Limitations: However, the review was not able to prove causality, could not distinguish between multichannel interventions and single-channel interventions, or between specific combinations of channels and message strategies. Discussion: The systematic review provides some guidance on which channels and message strategies to apply in communicative suicide prevention for men.
背景:尽管男性自杀风险很高,但自杀预防研究中的性别视角却很少。目的:本系统综述旨在描述传播渠道和信息策略对男性自杀预防干预的理想和不利影响。研究方法在 PubMed 和 Web of Science 数据库中检索了定量随机对照试验 (RCT) 和非随机研究,这些研究考察了针对男性的或一般的沟通式干预措施在男性中的有效性。研究结果采用叙事综合法进行总结。结果:收录了截至 2021 年 10 月 15 日发表在同行评审文章中的 55 项研究。研究结果表明,人际交往、大众媒体和数字媒体干预对自杀相关结果具有预防性影响。大众媒体干预并不适合以预防自杀的方式影响男性的情绪。信息策略的互动性、情感诉求和明确的行动号召表现出较高的有效性,而专家范例、可视化和个性化则效果不佳。局限性:然而,综述无法证明因果关系,无法区分多渠道干预和单一渠道干预,也无法区分渠道和信息策略的具体组合。讨论:本系统综述为在预防男性交流性自杀中应用哪些渠道和信息策略提供了一些指导。
{"title":"Desirable and Adverse Effects of Communicative Suicide Prevention Interventions Among Men.","authors":"Anna Wagner, Doreen Reifegerste","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000965","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000965","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Despite men's high suicide risk, gender perspectives in suicide prevention research are scarce. <i>Aims</i><b><i>:</i></b> The goal of this systematic review was to describe the desirable and adverse effects of distribution channels and message strategies of communicative suicide prevention interventions among men. <i>Methods</i><b><i>:</i></b> Databases PubMed and Web of Science were searched for quantitative randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies examining the effectiveness of male-specific or general communicative interventions among men. Narrative synthesis was used to summarize findings. <i>Results:</i> Fifty-five studies published in peer-reviewed articles until October 15, 2021, were included. Findings demonstrate that interpersonal, mass media, and digital media interventions impact suicide-related outcomes preventively. Mass media interventions are not suitable to impact men's emotions in a prevention-desirable way. Message strategies interactivity, emotional appeals, and clear calls to action demonstrated high effectiveness, while expert exemplars, visualizations, and personalization were rather ineffective. <i>Limitations</i><b><i>:</i></b> However, the review was not able to prove causality, could not distinguish between multichannel interventions and single-channel interventions, or between specific combinations of channels and message strategies. <i>Discussion:</i> The systematic review provides some guidance on which channels and message strategies to apply in communicative suicide prevention for men.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"365-375"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141972099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-03-18DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000955
Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, Hannah Metzler, Zrinka Laido, Benedikt Till, Alison H Lake, Emily Noble, Saba Chowdhury, Frances Gonzalez, David Garcia, John Draper, Sean Murphy, Madelyn Gould
Background: Between April 7 and 14, 2019, the "Breaking the Silence" media engagement campaign was launched in Oregon. Aims: We aimed to assess the consistency of media content related to the campaign with media guidelines and the quantitative footprint on Twitter (now X) over time. Method: Media items related to the campaign were analyzed regarding focus and consistency with media guidelines for suicide reporting and compared with other suicide-related reports published in the same time frame, as well as with reporting in Washington, the control region. Tweets related to the campaign were retrieved to assess the social media footprint. Results: There were n = 104 media items in the campaign month, mainly in the campaign week. Items typically used a narrative featuring suicide advocacy or policy/prevention programs. As compared to other items with a similar focus, they scored better on several protective characteristics listed in media recommendations. Stories of coping with adversity, however, were scarce. The social media footprint on Twitter was small. Limitations: Inability to make causal claims about campaign impact. Conclusion: Media items from the Breaking the Silence campaign appeared mainly consistent with media guidelines, but some aspects, such as stories of recovery, were under-represented.
{"title":"\"Breaking the Silence\" Suicide Prevention Media Campaign in Oregon, April 7-14, 2019.","authors":"Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, Hannah Metzler, Zrinka Laido, Benedikt Till, Alison H Lake, Emily Noble, Saba Chowdhury, Frances Gonzalez, David Garcia, John Draper, Sean Murphy, Madelyn Gould","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000955","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000955","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background</i>: Between April 7 and 14, 2019, the \"Breaking the Silence\" media engagement campaign was launched in Oregon. <i>Aims:</i> We aimed to assess the consistency of media content related to the campaign with media guidelines and the quantitative footprint on Twitter (now X) over time. <i>Method:</i> Media items related to the campaign were analyzed regarding focus and consistency with media guidelines for suicide reporting and compared with other suicide-related reports published in the same time frame, as well as with reporting in Washington, the control region. Tweets related to the campaign were retrieved to assess the social media footprint. <i>Results:</i> There were <i>n</i> = 104 media items in the campaign month, mainly in the campaign week. Items typically used a narrative featuring suicide advocacy or policy/prevention programs. As compared to other items with a similar focus, they scored better on several protective characteristics listed in media recommendations. Stories of coping with adversity, however, were scarce. The social media footprint on Twitter was small. <i>Limitations:</i> Inability to make causal claims about campaign impact. <i>Conclusion:</i> Media items from the Breaking the Silence campaign appeared mainly consistent with media guidelines, but some aspects, such as stories of recovery, were under-represented.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"330-338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140144381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-07-30DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000953
Simon Hatcher, Mark Sinyor, Nicole E Edgar, Ayal Schaffer, Sarah E MacLean, R Nicholas Carleton, Ian Colman, Navitha Jayakumar, Brooklyn Ward, Rabia Zaheer
Background: There is conflicting evidence on the suicide rates of different public safety personnel (PSP). There have been few studies that compare suicides in PSP with the general population and none that have used a detailed comparison of coroner records. Aims: The current study estimates suicide rates among different PSP and compares PSP suicides with the general population. Method: We identified coroner records of PSP suicides from January 2014 to December 2018 and compared each one to two matched general population controls. Results: We identified 36 PSP suicides and 72 general population controls. Police had a higher suicide rate than other PSP groups. PSP were more likely to die by firearm, be separated/divorced or married, die in a motor vehicle, have problems at work, and have a PTSD diagnosis. PSP were less likely to die by jumping. Limitations: The study may have not identified all PSP suicides. Apart from the cause of death, data in coroner records are not systematically collected, so information may be incomplete. Conclusion: PSP suicides appear different than the general population. Death records need to have an occupation identifier to enable monitoring of trends in occupational groups, such as PSP.
{"title":"A Comparison of Suicides in Public Safety Personnel With Suicides in the General Population in Ontario, 2014 to 2018.","authors":"Simon Hatcher, Mark Sinyor, Nicole E Edgar, Ayal Schaffer, Sarah E MacLean, R Nicholas Carleton, Ian Colman, Navitha Jayakumar, Brooklyn Ward, Rabia Zaheer","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000953","DOIUrl":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000953","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> There is conflicting evidence on the suicide rates of different public safety personnel (PSP). There have been few studies that compare suicides in PSP with the general population and none that have used a detailed comparison of coroner records. <i>Aims:</i> The current study estimates suicide rates among different PSP and compares PSP suicides with the general population. <i>Method:</i> We identified coroner records of PSP suicides from January 2014 to December 2018 and compared each one to two matched general population controls. <i>Results:</i> We identified 36 PSP suicides and 72 general population controls. Police had a higher suicide rate than other PSP groups. PSP were more likely to die by firearm, be separated/divorced or married, die in a motor vehicle, have problems at work, and have a PTSD diagnosis. PSP were less likely to die by jumping. <i>Limitations:</i> The study may have not identified all PSP suicides. Apart from the cause of death, data in coroner records are not systematically collected, so information may be incomplete. <i>Conclusion:</i> PSP suicides appear different than the general population. Death records need to have an occupation identifier to enable monitoring of trends in occupational groups, such as PSP.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"355-363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423415/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140865761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}